Connect with us

Tech

AI giants are storming S’pore with 6-fig salaries. But how serious is their investment?

Published

on

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed below belong solely to the author. Data sourced from Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower.

Singapore has become one of the battlegrounds in the global war for AI talent.

American giants OpenAI, Google, Meta and Anthropic are expanding their presence, while Chinese companies such as Alibaba, Huawei and ByteDance are increasingly treating the city as both a regional base and recruiting ground.

Fresh AI hires can receive S$70,000 to S$90,000, experienced machine-learning engineers can comfortably cross six figures, while the most sought-after PhD-level specialists may receive packages worth S$200,000 to S$350,000 or more, as reported by the Straits Times in May.

Advertisement

Chinese companies have been particularly aggressive, courting students at Singapore universities and dangling spectacular offers before some have even graduated.

But behind the salary headlines lies a more important question: how much are these companies actually investing in Singapore, and how much of that would remain if the AI boom suddenly ended?

First OpenAI lab outside the US

In May, OpenAI announced more than S$300 million for its OpenAI for Singapore initiative, including its first Applied AI Lab outside the United States. It plans to create more than 200 technical jobs here over the coming years.

Google DeepMind has also opened a Singapore research lab and expanded its partnerships with the government in healthcare, scientific research and workforce development.

Advertisement

Anthropic, the creator of Claude, which received investment from GIC and Temasek, has begun building a Singapore presence, which may eventually become a major regional operation.

Meanwhile, Chinese giant Alibaba selected the city for its first AI Global Competency Center—although it’s the Chinese companies whose commitment to Singapore might be the most shaky.

Friction with China

Around 50 Chinese AI-related firms have reportedly set up here since 2024, attracted by Singapore’s legal system, access to international capital, political stability and ability to operate relatively comfortably between China and the West.

Some are undoubtedly building genuine businesses here, while others may simply be acquiring a Singapore address. Therein lies the risk.

Advertisement

For Chinese tech companies, the city offers a convenient international face at a time when operating directly out of China can complicate access to Western customers, investors and technology.

The story of Manus shows just how complicated this can become. The AI startup packed its bags and moved its entire operation from China to Singapore before Meta agreed to buy it for around US$2 billion, only for Beijing to intervene and unwind the acquisition and bar Manus’ founders from leaving the country.

This warning salvo from the Chinese authorities may discourage mainland companies from using Singapore as a link to global customers and reduce the flow of jobs and money from all but the biggest companies.

Is it a bubble or a balloon?

The biggest danger, however, is outside of Singapore’s control. As the global AI buildout has reached extraordinary proportions, any sudden stop to it could throw the economy into a tailspin.

Advertisement

Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle and others are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into chips, servers and data centres, betting that future AI revenues will eventually justify the expenditure.

Perhaps they will, and the bubble will turn out to have been a balloon, lifting everybody. But what if they don’t?

It is already clear that investment is rising far faster than the revenues currently produced by AI itself. Singapore is currently benefiting enormously from that spending, having raised its GDP growth forecasts for 2026 to around 5%, but the Monetary Authority of Singapore has raised concerns about what would happen if the demand faltered:

If . . . there is a major retrenchment in AI investment, it could sharply weaken global growth through a fall in business investment and semiconductor demand and negative wealth effects.

Chia Der Jiun, Managing Director, Monetary Authority of Singapore

Advertisement

Global thirst for semiconductors, electronics, financial services and technology has helped propel economic growth, while the arrival of AI companies is pushing up salaries for scarce technical workers.

But it also means that Singapore is becoming increasingly exposed to any future downturn.

If AI revenues disappoint and investors stop rewarding companies simply for spending more, the adjustment could be very painful. AI itself would not disappear, just as the Internet did not disappear after the dot-com crash. But the money could.

Recruitment bonuses would shrink, hiring would be frozen, and experimental regional offices would stop expanding. Startups dependent on continuous fundraising would disappear or consolidate. Expensive research teams could be moved back to headquarters. And layoffs would, inevitably, follow, like they did in the years following the pandemic spending extravaganza.

Advertisement

That is why the most valuable AI investments are not necessarily those producing the biggest salary headlines today.

They are the ones that become difficult to remove tomorrow: research labs, engineering teams, intellectual property, regional decision-making, local customers and operations deeply embedded in Singapore’s economy.

Still, not even large investments are immune to downsizing. Everybody enjoying the generosity of their AI employers should keep that in the back of their heads. Make the most of historic opportunities, but prepare for what might happen if they come to an abrupt end.

  • Read other articles we’ve written on Singaporean startups here.

Featured Image Credit: depositphotos

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

All 2027 GM cars will be able to charge using Tesla Superchargers anywhere in the country

Published

on

General Motors is making a major change to its electric vehicles: every GM EV for the 2027 model year will get a native North American Charging Standard (NACS) port. Chevrolet, Cadillac and GMC models will all make the switch, allowing drivers to connect directly to compatible Tesla Superchargers and other NACS fast-charging networks without carrying a DC charging adapter.

According to a report by Electrek, the move covers GM’s entire 2027 EV lineup, including the Cadillac Escalade IQ, Escalade IQL, Lyriq, Optiq and Vistiq; Chevrolet Bolt EV, Blazer EV, Equinox EV and Silverado EV; and the GMC Hummer EV Pickup, Hummer EV SUV and Sierra EV.

GM is finally making fast charging less complicated

The change matters because charging standards have been one of the more frustrating parts of owning an EV. Most 2026 GM electric vehicles still use the older CCS1 connector, meaning owners need GM’s $275 NACS DC adapter to access compatible Tesla Superchargers and other NACS fast chargers.

The 2026 Cadillac Optiq has already made the transition, while the reborn Chevrolet Bolt, arriving in 2026 as a 2027 model, will also feature a native NACS port. Drivers buying a 2027 GM EV will still need adapters for some older charging infrastructure. CCS1 DC fast chargers will require a separate adapter, while most existing Level 2 charging equipment uses the J1772 connector. GM sells those adapters for $189 and $67, respectively, or $256 as a package.

For anyone shopping for a new GM EV, the native port should remove one particularly annoying piece of equipment from the charging routine. Plugging into a compatible Tesla Supercharger should work without reaching into the trunk for an adapter.

Advertisement

One charging app could make the experience even easier

GM is also trying to reduce the number of charging apps and accounts EV owners have to juggle. Energy Pass is integrated into the MyChevrolet, MyCadillac and MyGMC apps, allowing drivers to register and pay across multiple charging networks from a single account.

Supported networks currently include Tesla Supercharger, IONNA, Electrify America and ChargePoint, with EVgo planned for later. GM says the combined networks represent nearly 70% of U.S. DC fast chargers. Plug & Charge is also supported at compatible stations, allowing the vehicle to handle authentication while payment is processed automatically. The feature is already live at IONNA and is being expanded to additional networks, including Tesla Superchargers.

GM’s 2027 lineup should make fast charging considerably simpler, particularly for road trips. CCS1 and J1772 adapters will still be worth keeping in the trunk, though. The charging standard may be settling down, but the old infrastructure isn’t disappearing overnight.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Google Workspace Promo Codes: 14% Off for August 2026

Published

on

Google Workspace is that ubiquitous modern business tool that almost feels invisible. We use it every day here at WIRED, whether that’s for writing first drafts of articles in Docs, analyzing data in Sheets, or sharing files in Drive. And recently, I’ve been using the Gemini AI implementation that’s built right into these tools, which is handy in all sorts of ways.

Google Workspace grants access to all kinds of productivity features that can help streamline processes and increase communication within a team or organization. It’s not free, but here’s the good news: If you’re looking at a Workspace account for yourself (or for your team), Google is offering discounts until the end of 2026 using one of the Google Workspace coupon codes below. You can save up to 14 percent on plans for the first three months, whether you’re signing up as an individual or as a business. Either way, the Google Workspace promo code down below is what you want to use.

Image may contain: Henrik Dalsgaard, Aron Baynes, Art, Collage, Photography, Adult, Person, Baby, Electronics, and Plant

If you use Google’s apps and AI, it’s worth looking at this all-inclusive service. We break down the plans and how much they cost.

Save up to 14% Off These Google Workspace Promo Codes 2026

There are some notable differences between each Workspace plan – I’ll dig into them in the next section – but all three plans come with access to the full slate of Workspace apps. You get Gmail, Drive, Calendar, and Meet, of course, but even the cheapest Starter plan includes basic access to Google’s other apps, such as NotebookLM and Gemini inside the Workspace suite. If you want to save, make sure to click one of the promo codes at the top of this page to secure your discount.

Google Gmail and Workspace displayed on mockup of laptop

Google is making changes to its productivity suite again, and some of it may cost you money. Here’s what you need to know.

What Is the Best Google Workspace Plan?

Google offers four different Workspace plans, though only three are relevant for most people. There’s Starter, Standard, and Plus, as well as Enterprise, which is only available if you contact Google’s sales team. There isn’t a minimum number of users on any of the plans, but the bottom three options (Starter, Standard, and Plus) support up to 300 users. If you need more than that, you’ll need an Enterprise plan.

Advertisement

Although you have access to all the apps regardless of the plan you choose, there are some important differences, particularly between the Starter and Standard plans. Both include secure storage through Google Drive, but Starter comes with 30GB per user while Standard comes with a massive 2TB per user. Plus bumps that up to 5TB per user. Across all plans, storage is in a shared pool, so each additional user adds to the total pool of storage your organization can use.

Gemini is also a big difference between Starter and Standard. Although both have access to the Gemini app, Starter only has Gemini in Gmail and Vids. Standard (and Plus) includes Gemini across the full suite, including in Docs, Sheets, Slides, Drive, Meet, and Chat.

article image

AI can tackle your email mountain so you don’t have to. Here’s how to decide whether Gmail’s new productivity feature makes sense for your workflow.

Starter is a great option for anyone just getting started, regardless of if you’re a freelancer or a small business with a handful of employees. In addition to 30GB per user and limited access to Gemini, Starter comes with a few other limitations. It doesn’t support e-signatures in Docs, nor advanced features of Meet, such as noise cancellation. The bread and butter of Workspace is all here, though. You get a custom domain in Gmail, up to 100 participants in Meet, and the full Google suite of productivity apps.

Standard, as the name suggests, is Workspace proper, and it’s built for teams that need room to grow. That shows up most clearly in storage space, jumping from 30GB to 2TB per user. Standard basically cuts all the red tape on Starter. There aren’t any limitations on Gemini (it’s available across the full suite), Meet features like noise cancellation are available, and you can host up to 150 participants in a Meet call. Standard even comes with expanded access to NotebookLM, Google’s AI-driven note and research tool, with different chat modes and up to 20 generative audio overviews per day.

Advertisement

At the top of the range is Plus, which is focused on larger businesses. You don’t get any extra apps with this plan, but you do get 5TB of storage per user, along with up to 500 participants in Meet calls. The real reason to upgrade to Plus is security and admin controls, however. It includes Vault for data retention, along with LDAP access – basically a server for centralized account management, if you aren’t familiar.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Capital Discloses $215 Million Amazon Stake

Published

on

Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Capital has bought roughly $215mn of Amazon shares, disclosed in a regulatory filing on Friday. It lands in the same week the firm told investors it is selling part of its OpenAI stake, in a company Amazon now owns close to 5% of.

Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Capital has bought roughly $215mn of Amazon shares. The position was disclosed in a regulatory filing on Friday. Thrive declined to comment and Amazon did not respond to a request for comment.

It arrives in an awkward week for a clean reading. Thrive’s first formal investor letter, sent days earlier, disclosed that the firm is selling part of the OpenAI stake that has come to define it.

Amazon is now an OpenAI shareholder. It completed a $50bn investment this month for a holding of close to 5%, ahead of the company’s expected listing.

Advertisement

Read together, the two moves look less like a new bet than a change of wrapper. Thrive is reducing an illiquid private position and adding a liquid public one that contains a slice of the same asset.

Amazon holds the other side of the race too. It has funded Anthropic repeatedly, agreeing to put in up to $25bn more in April, and booked a $16.8bn paper gain on that stake in a single quarter.

Underneath both sits the compute. AWS supplies much of the infrastructure the model companies run on, which is the exposure a shareholder actually buys.

The stock has been rewarded for it. Amazon passed $3 trillion in market value this month, the fifth company to manage it.

Advertisement

None of this is a one-off. Thrive put about $100mn into Shopify earlier this year, citing AI tailwinds in e-commerce, and its public holdings already include Figma, StubHub and Oscar Health, the insurer Kushner co-founded.

Kushner set out the logic himself. “Many of our growth-stage companies compete with, partner with, or become the next generation of public technology companies,” he wrote. “The more precise our understanding of public markets, the better our judgment will be in private markets.

That is a reasonable argument, and it is also a venture firm filing 13Fs. The distinction between backing private companies and trading public ones is getting harder to see, and Thrive is at least doing it where everyone can watch.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Audacity Download Free – 3.7.8

Published

on

Audacity is a free and open source audio software for multi-track recording and editing. It can record live audio through a microphone, mixer, or digitize recordings from other media. With some sound cards, and on any recent version of Windows, Audacity can also capture streaming audio.

Import sound files, edit them, and combine them with other files or new recordings. Export your recordings in several common file formats.

Is Audacity suitable for recording a podcast?

Yes, Audacity features a large number of effects and preset EQ curves with real time preview. It also lets you import and export WAV, AIFF, AU, FLAC, and MP3 natively. In addition, an auto-duck feature lets you mix different audio tracks or voiceovers for recording a proper podcast.

Is Audacity safe to use?

Audacity is free and open-source software that’s been around for many years, so yes, it’s safe to use. There was some controversy in 2021 after the company was acquired by Muse Group and changes were made to the program’s privacy policy, but thankfully the community’s protests got Audacity back on track.

Advertisement

Does Audacity work on Android or iOS?

No, Audacity is not available for Android or iOS, but WavePad offers similar functionality and is available on mobile for free.

What are the best Audacity features?

Audacity packs several features for recording and editing different type of audio files such as:

  • 100+ sound effects.
  • Support for 16-bit, 24-bit and 32-bit audio files
  • Simple audio compressor
  • A built-in mixer
  • Plot Spectrum window for detailed frequency analysis
  • Batch processes for tuning up several audio files at once

What are the best Audacity alternatives?

WavePad and ocenaudio are well known alternatives for recording and editing audio files.

Is Audacity free?

Yes, Audacity is free and open-source. You can use this software for any personal or commercial purpose.

Features

Recording

Advertisement
  • Audacity can record live audio through a microphone or mixer, or digitize recordings from other media.

Export / Import

  • Import, edit, and combine sound files. Export your recordings in many different file formats, including multiple files at once.

Sound Quality

  • Supports 16-bit, 24-bit and 32-bit. Sample rates and formats are converted using high-quality resampling and dithering.

Plug-ins

  • Support for LADSPA, LV2, Nyquist, VST and Audio Unit effect plug-ins. Effects can be easily modified in a text editor – or you can even write your own plug-in.

Editing

  • Easy editing with Cut, Copy, Paste and Delete. Also unlimited sequential Undo (and Redo) in the session to go back any number of steps.

Effects

  • Real-time preview of LADSPA, LV2, VST and Audio Unit (macOS) effects. Plug-in Manager handles plug-in installation and addition/removal of effects and generators from the menus.

Accessibility

  • Tracks and selections can be fully manipulated using the keyboard. Large range of keyboard shortcuts.

Analysis

  • Spectrogram view mode for visualizing and selecting frequencies. Plot Spectrum window for detailed frequency analysis. Support for Vamp analysis plug-ins.

What’s New

This is a patch release. It contains the following changes:

  • #10688 Fixed an exception thrown when pasting into a newly-created track (Thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!)
  • #10870, #10884, #10775, #10629 Fixed tone generation, waveform-scale setting, SetClip Name parameter,
  • and clip-boundary command names for scripting and macros (Thank you, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!)
  • #11106 Fixed the loading of presets for the Distortion effect (A million thanks, David Bailes (@DavidBailes)!)
  • #10947 Fixed paste into an empty audio track not preserving the source sample rate (Thanks, Juan Gabriel Colonna (@juancolonna)!)
  • #10776 Allowed AltGr modifier in label and clip name editing (Thanks, Davide Peressoni (@DPDmancul)!)
  • #9938 Added options to choose where silence is truncated (start/middle/end) (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!)
  • #9935 Added Podcast 2.0 chapters JSON export for label tracks (Thanks, Noah Rosenfield (@nosenfield)!)
  • #10103 Improve UI on HiDPI displays on Linux/wxGTK (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!)
  • #10099 Fixed MixerBoard Mute and Solo button display (Thanks, Ivan A. Melnikov (@iv-m)!)
  • #10681 Fixed multichannel FLAC import
  • #10999 Fixed envelope being broken after joining clips

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Twin Guitar-Playing Robots Will Work For Tab

Published

on

Remember Animusic? They were these incredible animated music videos with original tunes being played by computer-generated robots. Well, the MegCell Pulse might be the coolest robots-playing-music thing we’ve seen since Animusic.

Built by [Bruce] over six years’ time, this futuristic wonder features two robots working in concert to play acoustic guitar, just like a pair of human hands would. You just feed them digital tablature, and off go the fraternal twins, with one doing the fretting, and the other doing the plucking via six individual plectrum. It’s digital music producing analog sound from a physical instrument.

How does MegCell Pulse work? It’s essentially a system of gears, magnetic actuators, and arms, contained in a 3D-printed structure. The only real limitations are that it can’t traverse the entire fretboard, nor can it slide between frets. That said, you can absolutely buy one for your own guitar via [Bruce]’s modestly-goaled Kickstarter.

Advertisement

The kicker here is that you can’t buy an assembled MegCell Pulse; you must print and build it yourself. Back on the upside, the most expensive supporting tier is a mere $100. For that price, you get the complete digital plans. That includes 3D print files, an assembly guide, the control software, and a parts list. Be sure to check out the demo videos embedded after the break.

We have certainly seen robots playing guitars before, although admittedly, it’s been a minute.

Advertisement

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

3 underrated movies you can watch for free this weekend (August 14-16)

Published

on

If your weekend plans involve sinking into the couch and wondering what to do next, consider this your rescue package. This week’s lineup comes with a bonus – every single movie here is completely free to stream. I dug through Tubi and Pluto TV‘s libraries and found a pothead comedy, a Swedish vampire film that reinvented the genre, and a Korean horror movie that still gets talked about years later. So, add these free films to your Weekend watchlist right away!

We also have guides to the best new movies to stream, the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best free movies, and the best movies on Amazon Prime Video.

Smiley Face (2007)

Genre: Comedy
IMDb: 5.9/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 64%

Advertisement

Jane (Anna Faris), an unemployed actress, accidentally eats a full batch of her roommate’s weed-laced cupcakes right before a packed day of errands. What follows is a chaotic, one day journey across Los Angeles as Jane tries to replace the cupcakes, make it to a big audition, and pay off her drug dealer, all while progressively getting more baked. However, paranoia and ridiculous distractions keep derailing her at every turn.

I recommend this one almost entirely for Anna Faris, who fully commits to playing stoned and turns this low-budget comedy into an absolute masterclass in slapstick humor. She won a Best Actress award at the Method Fest for the role, and it is easy to see why after watching her navigate simple tasks like an obstacle course. It is far from a polished film, and critics were split on it at release, but if you are in the mood for something silly and low-effort to watch, this one delivers exactly that.

Stream Smiley Face on Tubi.

Let the Right One In (2008)

Genre: Horror, Romance
IMDb: 7.8/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 98%

Advertisement

Oskar, a lonely twelve-year-old boy who gets bullied at school, strikes up a friendship with Eli, the strange new girl who moves in next door and only appears at night. As their bond deepens, a string of mysterious deaths begins spreading through their snowy Stockholm suburb. Oskar soon discovers Eli harbors a dark, bloodthirsty secret. Rather than leaning into typical vampire horror tropes, the film treats Eli’s condition as something tragic, tangled up in themes of isolation, first love, and quiet violence.

Director Tomas Alfredson shot the whole movie in muted blues and silences, letting the dread build gradually instead of relying on jump scares. Kåre Hedebrant and Lina Leandersson give remarkably mature performances for child actors, carrying scenes that require real emotional complexity. The final scene near the end is a masterpiece of tension and visual storytelling.

Stream Let the Right One In on Rakuten Viki.

Advertisement

The Wailing (2016)

Genre: Horror, Mystery, Thriller
IMDb: 7.4/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 99%

A quiet mountain village in South Korea is suddenly struck by a mysterious, violent sickness that drives locals to murder their families. An incompetent police officer named Jong-goo steps up to investigate the gruesome crime scenes. When his own daughter shows identical symptoms, his search for answers turns into a desperate race against time.

What starts as a straightforward procedural investigation slowly spirals into something far stranger, blending shamanistic ritual, possession, and paranoia. The intense exorcism sequence midway through is easily one of the most hypnotic scenes in modern horror cinema. I recommend this one for how thoroughly it commits to its slow burn, letting the mystery deepen for over two hours before its full scope becomes clear. That patience pays off with one of the most talked-about endings in recent horror cinema.

Advertisement

Stream The Wailing on Tubi and Pluto TV.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Google Must Make It Easier To Install Alternative App Stores, Judge Orders

Published

on

The company has a week to fix things.

Google began distributing third-party app stores through its Play Store earlier this week, but not everyone is happy with the company’s approach. The Verge reports that Judge James Donato, the US District Court judge who oversaw the company’s antitrust case with Epic, believes Google has introduced unnecessary “anticompetitive friction” to the download process and has given the company a week to make changes.

The judge took issue with the way Google presents third-party app stores in search results and the current process for installing them from the Play Store. Epic’s lawyers reportedly demoed entering the search term “store for apps,” which turned up no results for app stores and only results for physical stores like Walmart. The lawyers also showed that even if users are able to find third-party app stores, they’re not displayed in the normal list of search results and are instead buried under a banner for third-party app stores. “That is not acceptable, that has to be fixed. I want every possible variation that’s even only 70 percent properly phrased,” Donato said.

Google’s decision to replace the normal “Install” button with a “View” button on the only third-party app store on the Play Store, Aptoide, was also a major point of contention. Donato suggested that making people jump through an extra layer of menus to install the store was discouraging them from downloading it, according to The Verge. In response to Donato’s complaints, Google ultimately agreed to make changes and implement them in the next week.

Advertisement

The company first announced it would support third-party app stores in March 2026, one of several results of a settlement it reached with Epic near the end of 2025. The settlement was a modified version of the remedy Donato came up with in 2024, which largely focused on loosening Google’s control of the Play Store in response to the court finding the company had a monopoly on app distribution in 2023. Clearly Google’s first pass wasn’t loose enough.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How to watch Sri Lanka vs India 1st Test: Free Streams & TV Channels

Published

on

Test cricket returns to Sri Lanka after more than a year as the hosts prepare to take on neighbours India in an exciting two-match Test series, starting from August 15 in Galle. For India, more than Sri Lanka, there are crucial World Test Championship (WTC) points at stake.

After losing to South Africa at home, India now need 8 wins out of 9 matches to make it to the WTC final. Sri Lanka, meanwhile, need 6 out of 7 wins to keep their hopes alive, but they also depend on other results.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic is heading toward the largest IPO ever, at a possible $2 trillion valuation

Published

on

Bottom line: Anthropic is heading toward a possible October IPO, with many investors telling the Financial Times that they expect the company to reach a valuation of $2 trillion or more. That figure would make it the largest public offering on record and put the company at the top of a market that is becoming increasingly cautious about AI spending and valuations.

The expectations are driven by Anthropic’s rapid revenue growth. Investors expect its annualized revenue to reach $100 billion to $120 billion by the end of 2026. Anthropic said in May that its annualized revenue had surpassed $47 billion.

“If Anthropic is growing 800% a year, you’d think at the incredibly low end they would trade at 30 times [revenue],” one investor in the group told the Financial Times. “That would make them a $3 trillion company.”

Anthropic has not set a public valuation target for the offering. Several investors said senior executives had not shared one privately, either. Still, backers have built their own models based on the company’s enterprise sales growth and the performance of its AI systems.

Advertisement

The company has gained ground against OpenAI and Google this year. Its strategy has centered on business customers, with companies using Anthropic’s models and tools in internal workflows and customer-facing products. Ramp data showed that Anthropic increased its share of US business spending on AI last month.

The same data points to a growing issue for the sector: companies are watching their AI bills more closely. Ramp analysts said businesses were “hitting their limit on AI spend” and shifting some workloads to cheaper systems.

Anthropic’s top model costs more than two and a half times as much to use as OpenAI’s flagship model, according to Artificial Analysis. Chinese open-weight models are considerably cheaper. That price gap matters as companies shift from pilots and small projects to large-scale deployments, where inference costs can rise quickly.

Some customers have already changed their approach. Rather than pushing employees to use the most capable AI tools whenever possible, they have moved certain tasks to lower-cost models. The shift does not necessarily mean demand for frontier systems is falling. It does mean companies are deciding more carefully which workloads require the highest-performing models.

Advertisement

Anthropic filed paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission in June. The filing placed the company in a quiet period, limiting what it could say publicly about its financial results. Anthropic declined to comment on the planned offering.

The company has raised just under $100 billion from venture capital firms, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors in 2026. Its valuation reached $965 billion in May, including new investment, when it moved ahead of OpenAI for the first time.

But a public listing would come with risks that private investors have so far been willing to accept. Anthropic has faced pressure from the Trump administration and remains in litigation with the Defense Department, which labeled the company a supply-chain risk earlier this year.

The Commerce Department’s export controls also forced Anthropic to briefly remove its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models in June. Two investors said the disruption slowed overall revenue growth that month and raised concerns among customers who relied on the models.

Advertisement

The company recovered after that period, according to the investors. Even so, the IPO will test whether public-market investors are willing to place a multitrillion-dollar valuation on an AI company that is growing quickly but operating in a market where pricing pressure, regulation, and competition are all increasing.

“It’s easy to come up with challenges,” said an Anthropic investor who has also backed AI groups including OpenAI and SpaceX, which went public at a $1.77 trillion valuation in June. “But the company continues to be in first position in performance, positioning and what people want exposure to.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

ASU’s content creation degree grades your follower count

Published

on

The programme sits inside the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication. The first cohort enrols this autumn.

The Associated Press reported the launch and the backlash on 14 August. Kaitlyn Huamani, who covers social media and internet culture, wrote it.

ASU declined an interview request about the new degree.

The university’s own documents do not agree

The degree was created by a Senate motion. Motion 2026-076 passed after readings on 2 and 30 March.

Advertisement

Its language is unambiguous about the destination. Graduates are expected to work as influencers and content creators across livestreaming, podcasting, videography and immersive media.

Now read the degree page. It lists five careers with median salaries drawn from the Occupational Information Network.

Those five are communications specialist, marketing associate, marketing manager, public relations manager and public relations specialist. Influencer is not among them.

The salaries run from $74,750 for a public relations specialist to $166,790 for a marketing manager. One entry, marketing associate, shows demand shrinking by 2.2%.

Advertisement

That gap is the most interesting thing about this degree. The motion sells creators, and the prospectus sells communications jobs.

The capstone is a follower count

The requirement is unusual for a university. Students must build a following on a platform of their choice and show measurable growth before they graduate, Net Influencer reported.

Set against the rest of the curriculum, that is the only genuinely new part. The coursework otherwise overlaps ASU’s mass communication and media studies degree, with electives in podcasting, studio production and on-camera presence.

The cost is not unusual at all. Base tuition runs about $12,000 a year for Arizona residents, and the total cost of attendance can pass $37,000.

Advertisement

Out-of-state students pay more than $35,000 in tuition. Their total sits near $60,000 before scholarships.

The front door is being narrowed while they study

The platforms are moving in the opposite direction to the campuses. YouTube doubled two entry thresholds to its Partner Program this month.

From 1 February 2027, the long-form route needs 1,000 subscribers and 8,000 valid public watch hours, up from 4,000. The Shorts route needs 20 million views over 90 days, up from 10 million.

That change lands during the first cohort’s opening year. They will spend three more years working towards a bar that moved before they started.

Advertisement

Existing partners keep their status. So the tightening falls entirely on people who have not started yet, which is exactly who this degree recruits.

Where the $20bn actually goes

The industry number sounds like an argument for the degree. Emarketer forecasts US social media creator revenue above $20bn this year.

Max Willens, a principal analyst there, told AP what that figure conceals. “The overwhelming majority of that money is not going into creators’ pockets,” he said.

His forecast is starker than the headline. He expects the amount brands spend distributing and amplifying creator content to eventually surpass the amount creators earn making it.

Advertisement

On the degree itself he was direct. The idea that it will “suddenly turn people into viral content machines deserves a bit of a reality check”, he said.

The job behind the dream job

Brooke Erin Duffy, a communication professor at Cornell University, reads these programmes as an inflection point. Institutions have spent the past year treating content creation as a real career.

She is also blunt about what the work involves. It is a “time-consuming, labor-intensive job that often doesn’t pay well, at least in the beginning”, she said.

The stereotype gets in the way of seeing that. The prototypical influencer is imagined as a “young girl who is snapping selfies and just reaping in tremendous rewards for seemingly not doing anything”, Duffy said.

Advertisement

She has a theory about the timing too. Universities competing for a shrinking student population are courting parents who want a job that will pay off, and whether it does is another story.

The market is contracting as the courses expand

The creator economy has been shedding jobs, not adding them. Patreon cut 20% of its staff in July, 93 roles in total.

Automated content is crowding the supply side. YouTube’s purge of AI material has been catching human creators who never showed their faces.

The wider pattern is not confined to creators. Tech internship postings have fallen 30% since 2023 as companies hand entry-level work to AI.

Advertisement

There is a counterweight worth knowing. Estonian data on 2,000 brand partnerships found nano and micro creators outperforming mass reach, which suggests the viral target is the wrong one.

Europe already has one, and it says the word

Europe had a content creation degree first. South East Technological University runs a four-year honours course in content creation and social media at its Carlow campus in Ireland.

The syllabus is close to ASU’s, with video production, podcasting, digital marketing, audience psychology and data analytics. It also teaches influencer studies as a subject.

The difference is the careers list. SETU names influencer outright, alongside content manager, journalist and communications specialist.

Advertisement

Entry runs through the Irish points system at 308 to 432 under code SE300. That makes it a mid-tier course rather than a novelty.

Two American precedents nobody mentions

Not every version of this has worked. East Carolina University announced a credentialing partnership with MrBeast that never launched.

Columbia College Chicago went further and reversed. It folded its social media major into a generic marketing degree.

Others are still building. Syracuse opened a Center for the Creator Economy in September 2025, run jointly with its business school and open as a minor to any major.

Advertisement

Its dean, Mark Lodato, spent 14 years at ASU’s Cronkite School before moving. Quinnipiac and Colorado State offer minors, and St Bonaventure announced a major last winter.

The students are not the naive ones

Aiesha Beasley has been a full-time creator in Phoenix for three years, after more than a decade of posting. She now helps small businesses with their social media.

Her case for the degree is not about fame. “Having a digital presence and a personal brand is very important nowadays,” she said.

Sammy Cristerna graduated from ASU this spring in sociology and political science. He would have taken the content creation classes, he said, for brand deal negotiation and monetisation rather than for going viral.

Advertisement

He named the limit himself. Connecting on camera takes good energy, and “that’s hard to teach”.

What would settle it

Three things, and the first is the capstone data. ASU can publish how many students hit measurable growth, and that number would tell you more than any prospectus.

The second is the careers table. If a creator job ever appears on it with a median salary, the labour statistics will have caught up with the motion.

The third is survival. Columbia College Chicago already folded one of these into marketing, which is also where ASU’s own salary figures point.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025