Rode’s not done releasing trimmed-down versions of its production tools with an eye on budget conscious creators. Today, it’s launching Rodecaster Video Core, an all-in-one studio setup which sits below its flagship Rodecaster Video and its (now) mid-range Video S. It’s aimed at folks who are either dipping a toe into this world, or already have audio gear and just want to broaden out to HD video as well. Arguably, the biggest change is the lack of any controls on the hardware itself, as you’ll be running the show entirely from inside the Rodecaster App.

In terms of connectivity, you’ll find three HDMI-in, one HDMI-out, four USB-C, two 3.5mm and two Neutrik combo ports ‘round back. Connect a compatible video device to a USB-C port and you’ll be able to run up to four sources at a time, and you can even use network cameras via Ethernet. Plus, you’ll be able to use the Rode Capture app to wirelessly connect the feed from an iOS device to your setup. And you’ll even be able to set it up to automatically switch between feeds based on audio inputs, reducing your need to micromanage multi-person feeds.

And, if you’re already rocking one of Rode’s audio consoles, the Rodecaster Sync app will make your life a lot easier. Essentially, if you’ve got a Rodecaster Pro 2 or Duo, you’ll be able to hook it up to your Video Core, allowing you to set shortcuts directly to your pads. In fact, you can run your audio and video setup from the one desk, hopefully reducing the amount of fiddling you need to do in the middle of your stream.

Core is designed to stream straight to YouTube, Twitch and any other platforms you’d care to use instead. You’ll be able to record your footage to an external drive and, thanks yo a new firmware update across the range, you’ll also be able to output a EDL file for DaVinci Resolve. Oh, and you’ll now be able to import media in non-standard resolutions and aspect ratios — such as square footage from social media — which will be automatically scaled and optimized for your show.

Rodecaster Video Core is available to pre-order now for $599, but there’s no word yet on when the sturdy boxes will start winging their way around the world.

New kinds of aircraft, sorts of “flying cars” that can take off and land with little space like helicopters but function like airplanes, will start operating in US airspace as early as June, the US Department of Transportation announced on Monday.

Eight regions across the US, including New York and New Jersey, Texas, Florida, and Albuquerque, New Mexico, will take part in a three-year pilot program that will see new aircraft designs ferrying people and cargo around the country even before they formally receive full certifications from the Federal Aviation Administration.

The companies building the tech say their aircraft are quieter, cheaper, and release fewer emissions than helicopters or airplanes. Some promise totally autonomous trips. Many involved in the project, including electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, or eVTOLs, and ultra-short takeoff aircraft, require way less space to operate, landing and taking off outside of traditional airports and closer to where people live and work. The companies outline futures in which regular people can zip between neighboring cities in a matter of minutes, sailing above traffic and reordering the economy as they go.

Electra’s nine-passenger EL9 Ultra Short.

Advertisement

Courtesy of Electra

On an earnings call with investors earlier this month, Adam Goldstein, the CEO and founder of Archer Aviation, one of the firms involved, called the federal pilot program “our Waymo moment,” a science fiction project turned real life. “Now the goal is to have half a million people in the biggest cities in the country start to see these aircraft as part of your everyday commute, just like they started to see Waymos every day,” he said.

Archer’s electric air taxi, called Midnight, is built to carry up to four passengers on 60 to 90-minute trips. The company will take part in pilot projects in Texas, Florida, and New York. Goldstein told investors that Midnight would complete another important step toward certification “in the coming quarters.” The company has received funding from automaker Stellantis and United Airlines.

Other companies involved in the pilot projects include the small electric plane manufacturer Beta Technologies, Toyota- and Jet Blue-funded air taxi maker Joby Aviation, and Electra, which is building a hybrid electric ultra short aircraft. All four of those firms have completed test flights in the US.

“What we love about the [pilot] is the chance to demonstrate that this is not fantasy,” Electra CEO Marc Allen tells WIRED. “It’s not science fiction. It’s in the real world.”

A new set of laws in Australia requiring adult websites and app stores to age-restrict content for those under 18, and requiring AI companies to restrict chatbot offerings from displaying certain types of sensitive or adult content to minors, is apparently driving many to download Virtual Private Network apps there.

Major adult sites have closed their virtual doors to those who aren’t age-confirmed in Australia, and these changes follow a nationwide ban on social media use by teenagers and young children that went into effect in December.

According to reports from Reuters, The Guardian and others, in response to the bans, downloads of VPN-related apps, which people can use to circumvent location-based restrictions, are sharply on the rise. According to Reuters, three of the 15 most downloaded free iPhone apps in the country were VPN-related as the new laws went into effect on Monday.

Lawmakers in some regions, including the US, are well aware that people use VPNs in this way. In states such as Michigan and Wisconsin, laws are being proposed to limit or outright ban VPN use. Wisconsin’s proposed law would require adult sites to block VPN traffic, while Michigan’s proposal would ban VPN use entirely in the state.

There is also a proposal in England under consideration to ban VPN use by minors. That proposal is currently under review.

The Netherlands’ military intelligence service and domestic intelligence agency have issued a join warning claiming that Russian hackers have launched “a large-scale global cyber campaign to gain access to Signal and WhatsApp accounts belonging to dignitaries, military personnel and civil servants.” According to the Dutch alert, hackers are imitating support chatbots to trick key targets into revealing their PINs for those communication platforms, which allows the bad actors to access incoming messages.

Last year in the US, the Pentagon advised members not to use Signal after the platform was subjected to similar phishing scams by Russian hackers. (Although the same US military leaders proved capable of creating their own security breaches without foreign interference just days prior.)

Having another national government raise concerns about Signal and WhatsApp phishing scams offers yet another reminder to never provide security details or click links without a check on who is really asking for your info.

Innovation rarely happens in isolation. Usually, the systems that engineers design are shaped by global teams whose members’ knowledge and ideas move across borders as easily as data.

That is especially true in my field of robotics and automation—where hardware, software, and human workflows function together. Progress depends not only on technical skill but also on how engineers frame problems and evaluate trade-offs. My career has shown me how cross-cultural experiences can shape the framing.

Working across different cultures has influenced how I approach collaboration, design decisions, and risk. I am an IEEE member and a mechanical engineer at Re:Build Fikst, in Wilmington, Mass., but I grew up in India and began my engineering education there.

Experiencing both work environments has reinforced the idea that diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields is not only about representation; it is a technical advantage that affects how systems are designed and deployed.

Gaining experience across cultures

I began my training as an undergraduate student in electrical and electronics engineering at Amity University, in Noida. While studying, I developed a strong foundation in problem-framing and disciplined adaptability.

Working on a project requires identifying what the system needs to demonstrate and determining how best to validate that behavior within defined parameters. Rather than starting from idealized assumptions, Amity students were encouraged to focus on essential system behavior and prioritize the variables that most influenced the technology’s performance.

The approach reinforced first-principles thinking—starting from fundamental physical or system-level behavior rather than defaulting to established solutions—and encouraged the efficient use of available resources.

At the same time, I learned that efficiency has limits. In complex or safety-critical systems, insufficient validation can introduce hidden risks and reduce reliability. Understanding when simplicity accelerates progress and when additional rigor is necessary became an important part of my development as an engineer.

After getting my undergraduate degree, I moved to the United States in 2021 to pursue a master’s degree in robotics and autonomous systems at Arizona State University in Tempe. I encountered a new engineering culture in the United States.

In the U.S. research and development sector, especially in robotics and automation, rigor is nonnegotiable. Systems are designed to perform reliably across many cycles, users, and conditions. Documentation, validation, safety reviews, and reproducibility are integral to the process.

Those expectations do not constrain creativity; they allow systems to scale, endure, and be trusted.

Moving between the two different engineering cultures required me to adjust. I had to balance my instinct for efficiency with a more formal structure. In the United States, design decisions demand more justification. Collaboration means aligning with scientists, software engineers, and technicians. Each discipline brings different priorities and definitions of success to the team.

Over time, I realized that the value of both experiences was not in choosing one over the other but in learning when to apply each.

The balance is particularly critical in robotics and automation. Resourcefulness without rigor can fail at scale. A prototype that works in a controlled lab setting, for example, might break down when exposed to different users, operating conditions, or extended duty cycles.

At the same time, rigor without adaptability can slow innovation, such as when excessive documentation or overengineering delays early-stage testing and iteration.

Engineers who navigate multiple educational and professional systems often develop an intuition for managing the tension between the different experiences, building solutions that are robust and practical and that fit real-world workflows rather than idealized ones.

Much of my work today involves integrating automated systems into environments where technical performance must align with how people will use them. For example, a robotic work cell (a system that performs a specific task) might function flawlessly in isolation but require redesign once operators need clearer access for loading materials, troubleshooting faults, or performing routine maintenance. Similarly, an automated testing system must account not only for ideal operating conditions but also for how users respond to error messages, interruptions, and unexpected outputs.

In practice, that means thinking beyond individual components to consider how systems will be operated, maintained, and restored to service after faults or interruptions.

My cross-cultural background shapes how I evaluate design trade-offs and collaboration across disciplines.

How diverse teams can help improve tech design

Engineers trained in different cultures can bring distinct approaches to the same problem. Some might emphasize rapid iteration while others prioritize verification and robustness. When perspectives collide, teams ask better questions earlier. They challenge defaults, find edge cases, and design technologies that are more resilient to real-world variability.

Diversity of thought is certainly important in robotics and automation, where systems sit at the intersection of machines and people. Designing effective automation requires understanding how users interact with technology, how errors propagate, and how different environments influence the technology. Engineers with cross-cultural experience often bring heightened awareness of the variability, leading to better design decisions and more collaborative teams.

Engineers from outside of the United States play a critical role in the country’s research and development ecosystem, especially in interdisciplinary fields. Many of us act as bridges, connecting problem-solving approaches, expectations, and design philosophies shaped in different parts of the world. We translate not just language but also engineering intent, helping teams move from theories to practical deployment.

As robotics and automation continue to evolve, the challenges ahead—including scaling experimentation, improving reproducibility, and integrating intelligent systems into real-world environments—will require engineers who are comfortable working across boundaries. Navigating boundaries, which could be geographic, disciplinary, or cultural, is increasingly part of the job.

The engineering ecosystems in India and the United States are complex, mature, and evolving. My journey in both has taught me that being a strong engineer is not about adopting a single mindset. It’s about knowing how to adapt.

In an interconnected, multinational world, innovation belongs to engineers who can navigate the differences and turn them into strengths.