Apple has been accused of “aiding and abetting” the use of “nudify” AI apps on the iPhone, with San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu demanding they be removed from the App Store in a new cease-and-desist letter sent to the company.

A Wired report notes that both Apple and Google have been told to prevent the sale of AI apps that can be used to create deepfake images. They must also “sever” business relationships with all of the developers responsible for the apps.

So-called “nudify” apps have been around for some time. They allow users to create non-consensual intimate images of others, often minors, without the knowledge of the subject.

Such apps can be used to remove the clothes of subjects. Some allow the subjects to then be placed into specific scenarios of the user’s choosing.

Illegal, harmful, and completely unacceptable

In a statement provided to Wired, Chiu pointed out that generating deepfake imagery is “illegal, harmful, and completely unacceptable.” Chiu also noted that Apple and Google have likely made considerable sums from the sale of, or subscriptions relating to, such “nudify” apps.

Chiu also made it clear that Apple and Google have a responsibility to ensure that their platforms aren’t being used to create such content. His legal letters also pointed out to both companies that California law prohibits supporting services that can create deepfakes.

Google says that it investigates apps that are believed to be used to create deepfake content. It added that it “takes swift action” when required.

Apple issued a statement to AppleInsider on Friday evening after publication.

“The App Store was designed to be a safe and trusted place for users, and we have always strictly prohibited apps designed to generate, distribute, or consume pornography. ‘Nudification’ apps are against our App Review Guidelines and we have proactively rejected many of these apps and removed many others, including when users have flagged them via our reporting tools. We have removed three of the apps in question and are in the process of terminating their developer accounts from our program. We are in contact with four others that need to address policy violations or risk being removed as well.”

Apple previously removed a number of similar generative AI apps from the App Store. The company previously told AppleInsider that nudification apps aren’t allowed in the App Store, with no exceptions.

App Store reviewers appear to give developers some benefit of the doubt. Developers are first notified if their apps are found to be used to create “nudify” images.

Violations that aren’t addressed generally result in the offending app being removed from the App Store. It’s not clear if any of the apps in question have gone through this process, or where they are in it.

Apple also says that it actively blocks App Store search terms for such apps.

As for Chiu, he intends to continue to pursue both companies. For now, he wants Apple and Google to remove the offending apps and strengthen the tools that they use to screen new apps before they are made available for download.

Update July 18, 10:03 AM: Updated with Apple’s statement on the matter.

The duo behind the major 2024 cyberattack are reported to have been leading members of the Scattered Spider cybercrime collective.

Two men responsible for the 2024 cyberattack on Transport for London (TFL) have each been sentenced to five and a half years in prison by a UK court.

Owen Flowers and Thalha Jubair, who were teenagers at the time of the cyberattack, were sentenced today (16 July) at Woolwich Crown Court after previously pleading guilty to the hack. The pair were arrested and charged last year.

In late August and early September in 2024, Flowers and Jubair gained access to TFL customer data after impersonating an employee and tricking a phone helpdesk worker into resetting that employee’s password – leading to the theft of around 10m customers’ data.

The cyberattack – which cost TFL £29m – disrupted a number of transportation services in the UK’s capital, including a booking service that provides transport to vulnerable Londoners, while 148 technology systems were rendered inoperable.

In order to stop the attack, all 27,000 TFL employees were summoned to one of the authority’s offices for a password reset and its IT team disconnected its system from the internet.

Had the attack been successful in shutting down TFL’s entire network, it’s estimated that damages could’ve totalled up to £56bn.

According to the UK’s National Crime Agency, both Flowers and Jubair were leading members of cybercrime collective Scattered Spider, which has been linked to other major cyberattacks such as the Marks and Spencer hack.

As well as the TFL attack, Flowers also admitted to conspiring to launch cyberattacks on American nonprofit healthcare systems SSM Health and Sutter Health.

According to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), devices belonging to Flowers linked him to all three attacks, while information linking Jubair to the TFL cyberattack was reportedly found overseas.

During the trial – which began last month – the court heard that the duo livestreamed the TFL hack online. Telegram messages of Flowers and Jubair joking about the consequences of the cyberattacks were also uncovered and then used by the prosecution as evidence of the pair’s involvement.

According to the CPS, Flowers and Jubair are believed to be the first hackers to be successfully prosecuted under Section 3ZA of the UK’s Computer Misuse Act 1990.

“Flowers and Jubair broke into and accessed sensitive systems to extract information from millions of Oyster card-holders,” said Lionel Idan, chief crown prosecutor for SEOCID Regional and Wales Division in a press release.

“The evidence revealed not only the sophistication and persistence of their attack but also the recklessness of those responsible. Both defendants showed a staggering disregard for the consequences of their actions as their cyberattack led to TfL having to ‘pull the plug’ on their own network to protect it from wider disruption to the transport network.

“This successful prosecution was a perfect example of collaboration with investigators, prosecutors and international partners working together to build a watertight case that left Jubair and Flowers with little choice but admit their crimes.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Facepalm: GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen has sparked an unlikely controversy among gamers and long-time industry observers after stating that sales of physical video game discs are “totally irrelevant” to his company. While some are blaming Cohen for giving up on physical games, others argue that he is simply stating the obvious: these days, most AAA games are only available as digital downloads.

During an interview with Bloomberg News, Cohen was asked whether he worries about his company’s future in an era when publishers are increasingly pivoting to digital-only releases. Cohen replied that the decline of physical games would not hurt GameStop because “software makes up less than 12%” of the company’s overall business.

Explaining GameStop’s current business model, Cohen noted that trading cards and collectibles account for more than half of the company’s revenue, with Pokémon trading cards being the single most popular product on its store shelves. Cohen also pointed out that the $143 million the company earned in Q1 2026 represented “the highest operating earnings in the company’s history.”

According to GameStop’s latest financial report, collectibles and trading cards accounted for around 41% of the company’s revenue during the quarter, while software sales, once the company’s core business, accounted for only about 12%. The figures suggest that GameStop has evolved from the country’s leading video game retailer into a company whose business is now primarily driven by collectibles.

Still, Cohen’s remarks caught some gamers off guard, with critics arguing that stores like GameStop should be fighting to slow the decline of physical games, since they have long been central to the company’s business model. Other, more pragmatic gamers believe the CEO was simply stating the obvious, as sales of physical video games have long been surpassed by digital downloads.

Sales of physical copies of games have been declining for several years, with most AAA publishers no longer releasing physical editions of their latest titles. Recent high-profile games that launched as digital-only releases include Cairn, Marathon, Esoteric Ebb, and The Alters: Last Variable.

Rockstar Games also recently announced that the highly anticipated Grand Theft Auto VI will be a digital-only release, with the so-called physical edition containing nothing more than a code to download the game. However, following severe backlash from fans, the company hinted that it could release a true physical version at a later date.

Sony also joined the digital-only trend recently, announcing that it will no longer release physical copies of new PlayStation titles starting in January 2028. Despite protests, the decision is unlikely to be reversed, with the EU clarifying this week that it cannot prevent Sony from ending physical PlayStation game releases.

Months after analysts warned that AI-driven demand for memory chips would ripple through consumer electronics, India is providing the strongest evidence yet that the disruption has arrived, with rising handset prices reshaping the smartphone market.

The memory chips in question — RAM and storage components — are the same ones tech giants need by the truckload to build AI data centers. Manufacturers like Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron have been shifting production capacity toward high-bandwidth memory, the specialized chips used in AI accelerators, because they’re much more profitable per wafer than the standard memory used in phones and laptops — leaving less capacity, and driving up costs, for everyday consumer electronics.

India, the world’s second-largest smartphone market by shipments after China, saw smartphone shipments fall 10% year-over-year in the April-June quarter, according to market research firm Counterpoint Research, marking the steepest June-quarter decline in six years as higher memory costs pushed up handset prices.

The impact has been more pronounced in India than in China, where smartphone shipments fell just 2% in Q2, according to Counterpoint. India has been hit harder because about 60% of its smartphone market is concentrated in the sub-₹20,000 (under $210) segment, where higher memory costs have had the biggest impact on prices, Tarun Pathak, the firm’s vice president of research, told TechCrunch.

India has been a prominent market for global smartphone brands for several years. The South Asian nation, home to more than 1.4 billion people and over 700 million smartphone users, has become a bellwether for consumer demand in price-sensitive markets, making shifts in buying patterns closely watched by device makers, chip suppliers, and investors tracking the broader health of the AI supply chain.

Pathak told TechCrunch that consumers are unlikely to abandon smartphones altogether. However, many of them are expected to delay upgrades, stretching replacement cycles to around four years from about 3.5 years previously, while premium brands such as Apple and Samsung remain better insulated from the slowdown.

The uneven impact is already reshaping competition among smartphone makers. Samsung was the only major smartphone brand to post shipment growth in India in Q2, with volumes rising 2% year-over-year, according to Counterpoint. Apple, by contrast, saw shipments fall 3% — though that dip largely reflected supply constraints and inventory shortages limiting how many iPhones Apple could deliver.

Consumers buying higher-end smartphones have proved less sensitive to price increases, with financing making expensive devices more affordable, Prachir Singh, a senior analyst at Counterpoint Research, told TechCrunch.

The pain has been most acute at the lower end of the market. Shipments in the sub-₹15,000 (under $150) segment fell 45% from a year earlier, Counterpoint said. Because Chinese brands are heavily exposed to entry- and mid-tier smartphones, their combined market share fell to its lowest level for a second calendar quarter since 2020.

The tougher economics are also prompting strategic shifts. This week, Chinese smartphone brand OnePlus said it would stop launching new products in Europe and North America, while maintaining its India business, following what it described as a careful assessment. Counterpoint data shared with TechCrunch showed China accounted for 74% of OnePlus’ global smartphone shipments to distributors and retailers in Q1, up from 59% a year earlier, while India’s share fell to 19% from 30%.

In other words, OnePlus is retreating to markets where it can still turn a profit and ceding ground elsewhere — a pattern likely to repeat across other budget-focused brands as margins tighten.

Indeed, Pathak told TechCrunch that running several sub-brands only makes sense if each one sells enough volume to cover shared costs, and that math stops working once margins get this thin. “Sub-brands normally have overlaps and shared resources, and you need a minimum base to justify the cut-throat margins. Profitability is the key to deciding market operations,” he said.

Consumers feel the squeeze

That pressure on brands is trickling straight down to the people buying their phones. Kiranjeet Kaur, associate research director for mobile phones research at IDC, said the Indian smartphone market is shifting from volume-led growth to value growth — meaning fewer phones are being sold overall, but each one generates more revenue — as higher component costs make lower-priced smartphones increasingly uneconomical.

The higher component costs are already filtering through to consumers. Smartphone prices in India have risen by between 4% and 68%, depending on the model, Pathak said, and as prices rise, consumers are either moving to higher-priced devices, delaying upgrades, or turning to the secondhand market.

Financing has meanwhile become “central to affordability,” Kaur told TechCrunch. She added that brands and retailers were also building inventory ahead of the festive season to lock in lower costs before further increases in component prices.

IDC also expects India’s smartphone shipments to decline by double digits in Q2, a steeper fall than the 4.1% decline in the first quarter and the 5.3% drop in the previous quarter, Kaur said. However, she noted the firm’s estimates were not yet finalized.

Kaur told TechCrunch that memory shortages and elevated smartphone prices were likely to persist until at least the end of 2027, although the pace of price increases should moderate as consumers gradually adjust to higher prices becoming the new normal.

“For Indian consumers, it is a double whammy as the weaker currency makes imports costlier, which has added to margin pressures for the market players, and they are passing on the cost to the consumer,” Kaur said.

Alibaba’s chip design unit T-Head announced at the World AI Conference in Shanghai on Saturday that it is open-sourcing SAIL, the full software stack for its Zhenwu series of AI chips. The move is designed to lower migration barriers for developers currently locked into Nvidia’s CUDA ecosystem. T-Head said programmers can adapt SAIL to mainstream AI frameworks in under seven days.

The vast majority of AI developers globally write software using CUDA, Nvidia’s proprietary toolkit for programming GPUs. That dependency effectively locks them into buying Nvidia hardware, a dynamic that has helped the company reach a $3.4 trillion market cap. Xi Jinping used the same conference on Friday to argue that no single country should monopolise AI, and T-Head’s open-sourcing of SAIL is the infrastructure-level expression of the same argument: if China wants AI independence, it needs to break the CUDA lock-in at the software layer, not just build alternative chips.

T-Head is not alone. Huawei open-sourced CANN, the software platform for its Ascend AI processors, in 2025. Moore Threads has pursued a similar strategy with its own GPU stack. All three are competing for the same developer migration: getting AI engineers to write code that runs on Chinese hardware without losing access to frameworks like PyTorch. The challenge is less technical than habitual. CUDA has a 17-year head start and the largest library ecosystem in the industry.

For Alibaba, the timing is loaded. Anthropic accused Alibaba’s Qwen lab of running the largest AI distillation campaign ever against a US company last month, and the Pentagon added Alibaba to its Chinese military companies blacklist in June. Open-sourcing SAIL positions the company as a contributor to open AI infrastructure while it fights those designations in court. The 560,000 Zhenwu chips Alibaba has already shipped to over 400 customers now have a publicly available software layer, which makes the ecosystem stickier and harder for any single government to shut down.

Status Audio released its flagship Pro X Wireless Earbuds in 2025. Priced at $249, the Pro X combines Knowles balanced armature drivers with a dynamic driver, hybrid active noise cancellation, AI-powered VoiceLoom speech enhancement, and other premium features.

For 2026, Status Audio has partnered with YouTuber and Headphones.com reviewer Cameron Oatley, most commonly known from his GoldenSound YouTube Channel to create a special GoldenSound Edition of the Pro X Wireless Earbuds.

The GoldenSound Edition combines Status Audio’s existing hardware with a custom tuning profile and design aesthetic developed by GoldenSound. It retains the Pro X’s Hybrid Triple Driver Acoustic System, which uses a 12mm dynamic driver alongside two Knowles balanced armature drivers.

“Built upon extensive research and an understanding of how the human ear affects real-world sound, and made possible by Status Audio’s hardware and processing, the Pro X GoldenSound Reference Edition is tuned to disappear and leave nothing between you and the music,” said Cameron Oatley, host and founder of GoldenSound.

Related Reading:

For the Pro X, Cameron Oatley applied a custom tuning profile designed to reflect his signature sonic approach, with an emphasis on transparency, soundstage accuracy, and tonal balance. The goal is to position the Pro X not merely as a consumer earbud, but as a wireless in-ear monitor worthy of the GoldenSound seal of approval.

In addition to its revised tuning, the Pro X GoldenSound Edition introduces an exclusive gold-and-black finish with a metal-plated chassis. The new finish complements the Pro X’s redesigned, more ergonomic form factor, which is 21% smaller than previous models and sits more flush against the ear and jawline.

The Pro X supports Bluetooth 5.3 with Bluetooth LE, along with LDAC at up to 990 kbps, AAC, SBC, and LC3 codec support. Bluetooth multipoint allows it to remain connected to two compatible devices, while Auracast support adds access to compatible shared audio broadcasts. Google Fast Pair and Microsoft Swift Pair are also included for faster setup with supported Android and Windows devices.

Battery life is rated at up to eight hours per charge with active noise cancellation switched off, extending to as much as 32 hours with the charging case. The case supports both USB-C charging and Qi wireless charging, providing useful flexibility at home or while traveling.

The Status Audio and GoldenSound collaboration includes all the established technologies and features found in the standard Pro X, as outlined in the following chart.

Specifications

The Bottom Line 

Status Audio is not pretending that the Pro X GoldenSound Edition is an entirely new earbud, and that is precisely what makes the collaboration interesting. The triple-driver acoustic system, wireless platform, noise cancellation, microphones, and battery performance remain unchanged.

The distinction is Cameron Oatley’s custom tuning, which targets greater tonal neutrality, transparency, and spatial accuracy, along with an exclusive gold-and-black finish. Unlike many cosmetic partnerships, GoldenSound brings an established background in audio engineering, critical listening, and objective measurements to the project.

At $279, the GoldenSound Edition is aimed at listeners who were already considering the Pro X but want a more reference-oriented tuning or prefer the limited-edition design. It may also appeal to headphone and IEM enthusiasts who want audiophile priorities in a practical wireless format without sacrificing ANC, multipoint connectivity, Auracast, or LDAC support.

Existing Pro X owners will have less reason to upgrade because the underlying hardware has not changed, and the revised tuning should not automatically be described as better until it has been independently measured and auditioned.

For new buyers, however, the additional $30 could be a reasonable premium if GoldenSound’s tuning delivers a more balanced and accurate presentation rather than merely a different flavor.

Price & Availability

The Status Pro X GoldenSound Edition will be available for $279. Pre-orders are open now at the Status Audio website with initial shipments expected to start in September 2026.

The original Status Audio Pro X is available for $249 at Amazon.

The Status Audio GoldenSound Edition will be demonstrated at CanJam London from July 18 – 19, 2026. 

Related Reading:

The app also offers workouts, which auto-adjust the speed to your pace via sensors under the belt. It felt awkward, since I couldn’t figure out how to slow the pace without the device totally stopping. You switch between modes within the app or on the display, and you can stop and start the machine using the app or remote. I like to use the machine in manual mode, and I tend to use the app more than the remote, because the remote connectivity is inconsistent.

The machine feels like it will have a long lifespan. Its heft makes it harder to move around than the Sperax, and while the folding capability is a win in general, if you plan to slide this under something, make sure the folded height (5.4 inches) will work. Here’s my full review. —Kristin Canning

Most Versatile Walking Pad

Urevo

Strol 2S Pro Treadmill

Advertisement

AccordionItemContainerButton

WIRED

• Doubles as a treadmill with an adjustable handrail
• Impressive speed and incline ranges
• User-friendly companion app that syncs to unit

TIRED

• Speed may not be fast enough for users who want to run
• Workout data was occassionally wonky on the app

The Urevo Strol 2S Pro doubles as a treadmill and feels shockingly stable underfoot for how relatively lightweight it feels. I’ve tested several affordable treadmills, and they tend to feel wobbly at higher speeds, but this one remained firmly in place even as I ran on it at top speed and incline (7.6 mph and 9 percent). That top speed isn’t fast enough if you’re looking to really sprint, but it’s definitely ample for a good workout.

If you want to use the treadmill as a walking pad, you can keep the handrail down, which limits the top speed to 4 mph (though you can still use the full incline functionality). There’s a display on the front of the machine that cycles between time, distance, calories, incline, and speed. To access faster speeds, you have to put the handrail up, which requires you to use a hex tool to tighten it into place. The handlebar has a display as well, and you can control the machine’s basic functions from there. There’s also a tablet holder you can attach.

After months of speculation, it’s official: parent company Oppo is pulling OnePlus devices out of US and European markets. While existing customers are still going to get after-sales support and software updates from OnePlus, we’re not going to see any more new phones, tablets, or smartwatches in these regions in the future.

Oppo is branding this as a “strategic” move, but the decision is based on simple economics. OnePlus has always struggled to maintain the all-important carrier relationships in the US, and is being squeezed by Samsung, Apple, Google, and Chinese manufacturers in terms of sales.

The moment Wales have dreaded for months has arrived with Matchday 3 of Nations Championship 2026 – a clash with the Springboks in South Africa. Rassie Erasmus hasn’t yet put out anywhere near a full-strength team, yet the world champions have cruised to a pair of bonus-point victories that place them right at the top of the Southern Hemisphere standings.

Although there have been plenty of positives for Wales, who beat the Barbarians and Fiji after closing out their Six Nations campaign with a shock victory over Italy, they were brought back to earth with a bump last weekend. They conceded five tries in a 35-21 beatdown by Argentina, who simply overpowered Steve Tandy’s men.