Arm, one of the world’s leading chip design firms, announced Tuesday that it is producing its own semiconductors. The move is a departure from its long-standing model of licensing intellectual property to companies that manufacture and sell chips themselves. Speaking to a live audience in San Francisco, Arm CEO Rene Haas made his pitch for how the new Arm CPU could benefit the tech industry and why this is the right time for the company to step outside of its lane and go head-to-head with other chipmakers.
“Let me be clear: We are now in a new business for ARM, and we are supplying CPUs,” Haas said, holding up one of the company’s new chips. Arm’s primary reason for moving in this direction, Haas said, is demand from customers.. But as artificial intelligence proliferates throughout the economy and demand for computing resources skyrockets, Arm is also trying to capture a sliver of the growing AI CPU market.
Arm’s in-house chip efforts had long been rumored, but now the company is finally offering a clearer picture of what it’s doing. The new chip is called the Arm AGI CPU, a nod to artificial general intelligence, an often-invoked but still hypothetical form of AI that could match human performance across domains. It’s designed to be coupled with other chips in high-performance servers inside data centers and to handle agentic AI tasks. The chip is being fabricated by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, the world’s leading semiconductor foundry, and is being built using TSMC’s 3nm process.
At the chip reveal event, Arm executives emphasized the company’s history of designing energy-efficient chips and claimed that its new AGI CPU will be the world’s “most efficient agentic CPU on the market.” Compared to competitors like the latest x86 chips made by Intel and AMD, Arm says this chip will deliver better performance per watt, or the amount of energy a computer uses to operate, and could save customers billions of dollars in electricity spending.
Advertisement
The first major customer of Arm’s new chip is Meta, which the company says has received samples of the CPU. OpenAI, SAP, Cerebras, and Cloudflare, as well as the Korean tech firms SK Telecom and Rebellions, have also agreed to buy the chip. Arm projects its AGI CPU will reach “full production availability” in the second half of this year.
Santosh Janardhan, Meta’s head of infrastructure, appeared on stage and said he thought the Arm chip was going to “expand the [chip] industry on multiple axes.” As Meta pushes toward “personal superintelligence”—AI that will make its apps deeply personalized—Janardhan said the company needs more silicon, and is especially interested in power efficiency.
OpenAI’s vice president of science and former chief product officer, Kevin Weil, also showed up on stage alongside Haas. “One of the most common things I hear inside of OpenAI: ‘I need more compute,’” Weil said. “It’s kind of the coin of the realm.”
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Amazon senior vice president and distinguished engineer James Hamilton, and Google AI infrastructure chief Amin Vahdat appeared in pretaped video testimonials praising Arm’s new hardware. None committed to buying it, but all three tech giants already use Arm’s designs in their own processors.
Advertisement
Arm’s history traces back to the late 1970s, when it was known as Acorn and produced microprocessors. In the 1990s the entity changed its name to ARM (Advanced RISC Machines) and its then-CEO began licensing the firm’s chip designs to other companies. Arm, which has since dropped the all-caps “ARM” branding, saw its business boom during the mobile revolution. By the 2010s many of the world’s largest tech companies, including Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Samsung, and Tesla, were all relying on its technology.
Robert Walters’ report explores how Ireland’s professionals are managing increasing yet unrecognised workloads.
According to research from Robert Walters, Irish professionals are reporting an increase in work as a result of a growing ‘shadow workload’, consisting of the invisible, non-core tasks employees often undertake alongside their main responsibilities and activities.
Six out of 10 Irish participants in Robert Walters’ study said that in the last year, the remit of their work has expanded, without being officially recognised, acknowledged or accompanied by additional pay or career progression.
In response, professionals are finding themselves in a position where they are now working longer hours (53pc of respondents). Nearly one in five said that they often have to delegate tasks where possible. Only 16pc of those who contributed their data have even spoken to their employer about the sudden spike in workload.
Advertisement
Commenting on the announcement, Suzanne Feeney, the country manager at Robert Walters Ireland, said, “Many Irish organisations are navigating a tougher operating environment right now, facing cost pressures, greater competition for top talent and the need to deliver more with fewer resources.”
Flaming out
In the workplace, when the level of work increases it is often accompanied by burnout, fatigue and general dissatisfaction. The report found that to manage added responsibilities, employers are now turning to AI tools as a means of creating more time. 37pc of Irish workers admitted to using AI tools to handle tasks they typically wouldn’t be able to manage.
More than two in five participants (42pc) explained that burnout at work is a frequent occurrence, while a further 35pc reported it as being an intermittent experience.
“Taking on new responsibilities can be valuable for both individuals and organisations, particularly when it supports growth and capability building,” said Andrew Powell, the chief commercial officer at Robert Walters.
Advertisement
“But if that effort isn’t recognised or managed effectively, it can lead to fatigue and diminishing returns, impacting everything from decision-making to overall productivity.”
Powell advised employers and leaders to keep an eye on how work is being distributed and whether employees are under increasing levels of pressure.
He said, “Addressing workload creep requires having greater visibility of where pressure is building and responding with the right mix of solutions, whether that’s redistributing work, investing in the right tools or bringing in temporary expertise where needed.
“Ultimately, organisations that strike the right balance between efficiency and sustainable workloads will be better positioned to maintain long term performance.”
Advertisement
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
AirPods started as the wireless earbuds people bought for music, calls, podcasts, and ignoring strangers on the subway with commitment. Apple’s next move could make them a lot harder to ignore.
According to reporting from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple is testing a future version of AirPods with built-in low-resolution cameras designed for AI features, not traditional photo or video capture. The goal, reportedly, is to let AirPods gather visual information about the user’s surroundings and feed that context into Siri or other Apple Intelligence features. In other words, this is less “AirPods become a GoPro for your ears” and more “Apple wants its earbuds to understand what you are looking at.”
The reported prototypes are said to be in design validation testing, a late development stage before production validation, with Bloomberg describing the design and feature set as close to final. Apple has not announced the product, confirmed a release date, or posted anything about camera-equipped AirPods on its own website, so this remains a reported product in testing rather than an official launch.
That distinction matters, especially when the words AirPods, cameras, and AI appear in the same sentence and everyone starts acting like Cupertino just invented surveillance earrings.
Advertisement
What makes this interesting is not that Apple might add cameras to earbuds. It is what those cameras would be for. If the reporting is accurate, future AirPods could become another sensor layer in Apple’s wearable ecosystem, working alongside the iPhone, Apple Watch, Vision Pro, and eventually whatever comes next in smart glasses. Music would still be part of the story, but the bigger play is contextual AI: earbuds that can listen, sense, and help Apple’s software understand the world around the user without requiring a headset on your face.
AI Sensing, Not Ear Photography
The reported goal is not to turn AirPods into a tiny camera rig for people who think society has not suffered enough. The cameras would reportedly be used primarily as sensors, giving Apple’s earbuds a better understanding of the user’s surroundings and helping support more advanced AI-driven features.
That could include the ability to read and interpret elements of the user’s environment, provide more useful contextual awareness through Apple Intelligence, support spatial computing experiences, and improve gesture or motion recognition.
The important distinction is that these would not be cameras in the traditional “take a photo and post it” sense, even if still-image capture were technically possible.
Advertisement
Apple AirPods Pro 3 with charging case (2025 model)
The Real Play Is Device Coordination
The more interesting angle is not what the cameras see, but how Apple might use that information across its devices and AI platform.
AirPods already sit in a privileged position: they are worn close to the head, always connected, and used in moments when pulling out an iPhone is inconvenient or socially awkward. Add visual sensing to that equation, and Apple gains another input point for hands-free interaction.
That could make future AirPods useful for things like confirming where a user is facing, helping Siri respond with better situational context, or improving control methods that do not require tapping a screen. The earbuds become less of a standalone product and more of a quiet relay between the user and Apple’s larger hardware stack.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
The iPhone would still do the heavy lifting, because of course it would. At this point, the iPhone is less a phone and more the overworked manager at an Apple Store on launch day. But the value of camera-equipped AirPods would come from feeding it better real-world context, not replacing it.
That is where this rumor starts to make sense. Apple may not be trying to reinvent the earbud. It may be trying to make AirPods another control surface for the next phase of computing.
Apple TV May Be Next in Apple’s AI Hardware Push
The AirPods rumor is not the only sign that Apple may be trying to move AI deeper into its hardware lineup. A next-generation Apple TV box is also reportedly in development, with a newer chip designed to support more advanced Apple Intelligence and Siri features.
The expected upgrades are said to include better Siri interaction, improved video processing, stronger connectivity, and enhanced audio support. A built-in camera has also been reported, although that would likely be aimed at FaceTime, gesture control, user recognition, or smart home interaction rather than turning the Apple TV into a living-room security camera with better branding.
Advertisement
The catch, predictably, is Siri. Reports suggest the new Apple TV has been pushed back because Apple’s upgraded AI version of Siri still is not ready for prime time. That matters because a more capable Siri would be central to the whole pitch. Without it, Apple just has a faster streaming box with a camera, and that is not exactly a revolution. That is a Zoom meeting with better Dolby Vision.
The Bottom Line
The important distinction is that Apple has confirmed none of this. There is no official AirPods-with-cameras announcement, no new Apple TV box announcement, no Apple TV Pro branding, and no published Apple release date for either product. For now, these are reported developments, not finished products.
What appears credible is the direction of travel. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple’s camera-equipped AirPods have reached an advanced testing stage, with low-resolution cameras designed to feed visual context to Siri and Apple’s AI systems rather than function like traditional cameras. The Verge, Macworld, and others have also covered the Bloomberg reporting, while Geeky Gadgets has summarized separate Apple TV 4K rumors involving a faster chip, Apple Intelligence, smarter Siri, and possible timing delays.
The rumor side is just as important. A built-in camera for Apple TV, “Apple TV Pro” branding, final specs, pricing, and launch timing remain unconfirmed. Reports around a delayed 2026 Apple TV upgrade also point back to the same central issue: Apple needs the next version of Siri to be smarter before these products make sense. Without that, this becomes expensive hardware waiting for the software to stop eating paste in the corner.
Advertisement
Why does it matter? Because Apple may be moving beyond passive devices and toward products that see, hear, process, and react with more context. That could make AirPods and Apple TV more useful for accessibility, smart home control, spatial computing, FaceTime, gesture control, entertainment, and hands-free AI interaction. It also raises obvious privacy questions, because putting cameras into earbuds or a living room streaming box is not exactly a small psychological hurdle.
Lemme tell you sumthin’ about The Punisher: it’s about time he received top billing in a project set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) — and that time is now.
Indeed, The Punisher: One Last Kill will see Jon Bernthal’s anti-hero take center stage in a new Marvel TV Special. Thankfully, we don’t have much longer to wait for its arrival, either, because it’ll make its Disney+ debut later this week.
Want to know when it’ll air where you live? Of course you do. So, read on to learn more.
Advertisement
Latest Videos From
What time can I watch The Punisher: One Last Kill?
One Last Kill is reportedly set before and during Daredevil: Born Again season 2 (Image credit: Marvel Television/Disney+)
In North and South America, the MCU TV special will launch on Disney+, one of the best streaming services, at 6pm PT / 9pm ET on Tuesday, May 12.
Don’t worry if you don’t live on either of those continents. The Marvel Phase 6 production will also be available to watch in other territories, albeit a day later on Wednesday, May 13. Check out the list below to see what time it’ll drop where you live:
Advertisement
US — Tuesday, May 12 at 6pm PT / 9pm ET
Canada — Tuesday, May 12 at 6pm PT / 9pm ET
UK — Wednesday, May 13 at 2am BST
India — Wednesday, May 13 at 6:30am IST
Singapore — Wednesday, May 13 at 9am SGT
Australia — Wednesday, May 13 at 11am AEST
New Zealand — Wednesday, May 13 at 1pm NZST
What is the runtime for The Punisher: One Last Kill?
The Punisher’s TV Special should lead directly into Marvel’s next big-screen project (Image credit: Marvel Television/Disney+)
The Punisher’s Special Presentation should last around 60 minutes. View it as a slightly longer version of a traditional Marvel TV show episode, which usually runs between 30 and 50 minutes, rather than a TV movie per se.
It’s unclear if that runtime includes its end credits crawl, and a mid- and/or post-credits scene. However, considering One Last Kill is expected to lead directly into the events of Spider-Man: Brand New Day, in which Frank Castle will appear, I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s an end credits scene to stick around for.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Although there’s no denying that the Apple Watch very much led the charge across the smartwatch industry for a good while there, in 2026 Wear OS watches are as good as they’ve ever been, boasting several features that’ll leave even Apple users feeling jealous. If you’re an Android user and are curious to know what the best Wear OS watches are right now, then we’re here to help.
One of the key things that really works in Wear OS’s favour right now is that unlike the Apple Watch which, on average, presents you with three choices each generation, you have an absurd amount of choice here. You have companies like TicWatch that have been Wear OS stalwarts for years, alongside more recent converts like OnePlus and Samsung, but then you also have Google.
The Android maker finally getting into the wearable space and effectively showing its confidence in its wrist-based platform was the game-changer that Wear OS needed. The Pixel Watch series now serves as a great example of what’s possible with Wear OS, much in the same way as the best Pixel phones with stock Android. Since the first Pixel Watch, we’ve only seen companies build upon that concept with more features, showing that innovation in this space is very much alive and well.
The only key thing to know is that, unlike how it used to be before Google shifted everything forward from Wear OS 3 onwards, these smartwatches do not work with iPhone. If you are tempted by any of the smartwatches we’ve highlighted here then you’ll need to have one of the best Android phones in tow.
Advertisement
With more Wear OS watches hitting the scene every year, this list is in a constant state of flux so it’s always worth checking back to see how our rankings have changed. If you’re focused purely on tracking your running performance then you may be better set with one of the best Garmin watches or the best fitness trackers. Alternatively, anyone who doesn’t want to go beyond a certain budget can find cost-effective picks in our guide to the best cheap smartwatches.
Best Wear OS Smarwatch at a glance
Advertisement
SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST
How we test
Find out how we test Wear OS smartwatches
Advertisement
Every smartwatch we test is used by the reviewer for at least a week, or longer if the battery life lasts beyond that point or we need more time to trial its features.
During testing, we will check it for key metrics, including app support, usability and battery life. If the device offers fitness, location or health tracking features, we will also test these for accuracy and reliability.
For distance tracking, we record how accurately the device recorded runs on tracks we know the length of. We also record how much battery is lost using things like in-built or connected GPS per hour. To check heart rate accuracy, we compared the results recorded on the wearable to those of a dedicated HRM strap.
After recording the data, we then pair it with our general experience using the wearable day-to-day, letting you know if it’s comfortable to wear or if we encountered unexpected bugs over the review period.
Advertisement
Pros
The new Galaxy Watch Ultra-inspired design
An actually useful smart assistant
Welcome user interface changes
Cons
The promised battery life improvement is disappointing
Some health features still tied to Samsung smartphones
Some might not be sold on new design
Pros
Best battery life of any Wear OS smartwatch
Impressive durability given its sleek look
Top-notch health and fitness tracking capabilities
Cons
Only available in one size
Wellness score can be hit-and-miss
Pros
Outstanding battery life
Wear OS 3 is finally on a TicWatch
Fast charging
The secondary FSTN display is always welcome
Cons
Not the most stylish of smartwatches
Included watch faces are hit and miss
No Google Assistant
Pros
Charming take on Wear OS 6
Excellent Fitbit-powered health tracking
LTE and satellite connectivity
Multi-day battery life and rapid charging
Cons
Fitbit Premium locks some health data behind a paywall
Exposed screen could make it more prone to damage
Some AI features not available outside the US
Pros
Rotating bezel makes it easy to scroll
New software is a joy to use
In-depth sleep and health tracking
Cons
Screen is relatively small for a wearable of its size
Just over a day of battery life
Some flagship features exclusive to Samsung phones
You need to install three separate apps on your phone
Pros
Wear OS gets some design personality
Strong GPS and HR accuracy
Ultra-bright and clear display
Comprehensive sleep tracking
Cons
Navigation crying out for rotating bezel
Inconsistent battery life
Not a good fit for smaller wrists
Exclusive features for Samsung phones
The new Galaxy Watch Ultra-inspired design
An actually useful smart assistant
Welcome user interface changes
The promised battery life improvement is disappointing
Some health features still tied to Samsung smartphones
Some might not be sold on new design
Depending on who you ask, the redesigned Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is either a great move forward in allowing Samsung’s wearable to stand out in an ever-growing market, or it’s a weird Frankenstein’s monster that does away with the sleek aesthetic that we’ve come to expect. For our money, the Galaxy Watch Ultra-inspired ‘squarcle’ chassis is refined in its own way, and it does grab your attention.
Advertisement
Although the revamped design is the biggest change on the surface, the real upgrade with this watch is the replacement of Google Assistant with Gemini from the point of launch. Don’t get us wrong, Google Assistant was great and far more helpful than Siri, but having access to Gemini and all that comes with an AI platform on your wrist is an absolute game changer for on-the-go functionality.
You can have a full-on conversation with Gemini, all without ever having to reach for your phone. If you want a recommendation for a decent cafe to hang out in then you can ask Gemini and it’ll provide a few options right there on the watch. Obviously you can do far more than that, but it serves as a good example of what’s possible.
Having quick access to Gemini very much feels like the cherry on top of the Galaxy Watch 8’s software which already builds upon the excellent refinements we’ve seen from Samsung over the years. This take on Wear OS feels great to use, and that extends to the fitness tracking which feels robust, providing plenty of options and reams of data that enthusiasts can pore over.
One thing we would have liked to see, especially as it became a key point of the Pixel Watch 4, is a noticeable uptick in battery life. For the most part, the Galaxy Watch 8 still needs to be charged daily which just feels absurd in 2026, so you may want to switch off the always-on display to get a little more juice out of the watch in between charges.
Advertisement
Best battery life of any Wear OS smartwatch
Impressive durability given its sleek look
Top-notch health and fitness tracking capabilities
Only available in one size
Wellness score can be hit-and-miss
Advertisement
For the longest time it was the TicWatch Pro 5 that held the top spot on this list, but as soon as we got the OnePlus Watch 3 in for testing, we knew that the ranking would change fairly quickly. The chasm between the original (and abysmal) OnePlus Watch and the new OnePlus Watch 3 couldn’t be wider, and it shows just how much OnePlus has looked at the industry and taken that knowledge to improve its own products.
While there’s no denying that the OnePlus Watch 3 is a stylish bit of kit, the one area where it truly amazes above all is in battery life. The longevity of smartwatches has been a conundrum for quite some time, and even Apple has yet to really find a fix that can make the Apple Watch Series 10 last for more than a day, but that’s not a problem for the OnePlus Watch 3.
On a single charge, OnePlus’ wearable can last for up to five days at time, so it could easily outlast your smartphone several times over. As if that wasn’t enough, the power-saving RTOS mode can extend that run-time to a whopping 16 days which, at that point, you’re starting to get into Garmin territory, which isn’t something that we typically anticipate from a Wear OS watch.
Even when the RTOS mode is on, there’s still tons of functionality available on your wrist including music controls, workout tracking and even heart rate monitoring. Similar to the ingenious dual-display on the TicWatch Pro 5, this RTOS mode is the type of feature that we’d love to see more of the competition adopt going forward.
Advertisement
The only area that didn’t quite stack up was the wellness score provided by the OnePlus Watch 3, as it often seemed at odds with how we actually felt in the moment, but it’s an otherwise small blemish on what is a long lasting smartwatch that’s packed with features.
Outstanding battery life
Wear OS 3 is finally on a TicWatch
Fast charging
The secondary FSTN display is always welcome
Advertisement
Not the most stylish of smartwatches
Included watch faces are hit and miss
No Google Assistant
Mobvoi has been one of the staunchest supporters of Wear OS, even when Google was supplying the software with the bare minimum in terms of updates. While the company’s devices have been hit and miss in terms of quality, its experience in the market finally came to fruition with the excellent TicWatch Pro 5.
The watch has seen several price drops since its launch and you can now pick it up at a significantly discounted rate, even though it’s still an absolute beast where battery life is concerned. Thanks to the low-power secondary FSTN display at sits atop of the main screen, you can expect up to five days of use on a single charge.
That amount of longevity absolutely destroys most smartwatches, and the secondary display is a feature that we wish was adopted by more competitors. Not only is it easier to read in direct sunlight, but the coloured backlight can quickly let you know of your current heart rate zone during a workout. Features like these make the TicWatch Pro 5 one of the most well-rounded smartwatches on the market, and not just amongst its Wear OS peers.
Advertisement
Charming take on Wear OS 6
Excellent Fitbit-powered health tracking
LTE and satellite connectivity
Multi-day battery life and rapid charging
Fitbit Premium locks some health data behind a paywall
Exposed screen could make it more prone to damage
Some AI features not available outside the US
Advertisement
One of the key things the Pixel Watch has always had going for it is its memermising design, and that only continues with the Pixel Watch 4. The pebble-like chassis which hides its bezels phenomenally well is just unlike any other Android smartwatch on the market, and it feels more akin to something that you might find amongst the latest Apple Watches.
With the eye-catching design, you’re getting one of the best looks at Wear OS that’s currently available. This shouldn’t be too surprising given that Google is behind the device, so it very much gets preferential treatment here with a slick UI and seamless integration with Google services, but if you want the cleanest, almost watchOS-like take on Wear OS then this is it.
When it comes to fitness tracking, the Pixel Watch 4 uses the new Google Health Coach software to provide an accessible yet comprehensive look at your bill of health. The app goes all in on offering personalised information that’s tailor-made to your fitness journey, although if you want to access all of the features available then you’ll need to sign up to a Google Health Premium account which, at the time of writing, costs £7.99/$9.99 a month.
Although we’ve seen a handful of smartwatches fall into iterative territory with each update, this complaint can’t be levied at the Pixel Watch 4, which has included quite a few meaningful changes. For starters, the battery can now last for around two days on a single charge – a big win for doing away with battery anxiety over the course of a busy day.
Advertisement
The screen is also brighter than before, peaking at 3000 nits and making the Pixel Watch 4 very easy to read against direct sunlight. Listening to plenty of feedback on the matter, Google has even endeavoured to make the process of repairing the Pixel Watch 4 much easier than before (it was nigh-on impossible on the Pixel Watch 3). This won’t be a feature that everyone needs to tap into but as far as we’re concerned, it’s a big win for consumer value.
Rotating bezel makes it easy to scroll
New software is a joy to use
In-depth sleep and health tracking
Advertisement
Screen is relatively small for a wearable of its size
Just over a day of battery life
Some flagship features exclusive to Samsung phones
You need to install three separate apps on your phone
As much as we love the standard Galaxy Watch 8, if you want something that’s a bit more refined with a few extras that make a big difference with everyday use, then the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is well worth a look. Even just to glance at the 8 Classic, it’s easy to see that this is one of the nicest-looking Wear OS watches on the market, being right up there with the Pixel Watch 4.
In addition to the more sophisticated design, the Watch 8 Classic comes with a physical rotating bezel – a feature which doesn’t exist on any other Wear OS watch. With this unique input, you can scroll through menus and engage with contextual controls (such as changing the volume of a song) just by rotating the bezel. It feels wonderfully tactile, and it can be very helpful to have mid-workout when you don’t want to smudge the touchscreen.
Because this is a larger wearable than the standard Galaxy Watch 8, offering just one 46mm sizing, the 8 Classic has more space available for the battery. As such, this device can run for up to two days on a single charge under more conservative use, although it’s more likely that you’ll get through a day and a half before needing to top up, especially if you want to have the always-on display and several health tracking features enabled.
Advertisement
Just like its smaller sibling, the Watch 8 Classic offers up access to Google Gemini on your wrist. With the type of dialogue that you can only enjoy through a proper large language model, Gemini leaves Siri in the dust here, as you can now do far more without ever having to reach for your phone. Want directions to a nearby establishment or an answer to a tricky question? Gemini’s got you covered.
The Watch 8 Classic also packs 64GB of storage, more than the 32GB allowance of the Watch 8, so you have more room for storing songs and podcasts offline, as well as holding on to more apps. At £449/$499, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is far more expensive than most Wear OS watches, although the sense of luxury will be worth the expense for some, and we’ve seen it drop in price quite a few times since launch so this isn’t as much of an issue as it used to be.
Advertisement
Wear OS gets some design personality
Strong GPS and HR accuracy
Ultra-bright and clear display
Comprehensive sleep tracking
Navigation crying out for rotating bezel
Inconsistent battery life
Not a good fit for smaller wrists
Exclusive features for Samsung phones
Aside from a few outliers from high-end companies like Mont Blanc, Wear OS watches have largely avoided the premium space, opting to stay just below the Apple Watch in terms of pricing. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra serves to buck that trend, offering a top shelf experience that isn’t too dissimilar to what iPhone users have been able to enjoy with the Apple Watch Ultra.
With an asking price of £599/$649, the Galaxy Watch Ultra will far exceed the budgets of most buyers but in return, you’re getting a watch that’s built with grade 4 titanium and to fit a level of military grade durability. There’s also a new quick button which can’t be found on any other Galaxy Watch, making things easier when toggling features like fitness tracking or the torch function.
Advertisement
The only thing missing is a physical rotating bezel similar to the one found on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic. The digital rotating bezel from the standard Galaxy Watch is here, but it’s less useful given that physical inputs are far easier to use during extended periods of exercise, something that’s understood by the best Garmin watches.
When it comes to Wear OS, the Galaxy Watch Ultra is able to show off Google’s operating system in its best light. In addition to the super bright display that can reach 2000 nits, the Watch also has Wear OS 5 out of the box, making it one of the first wearables of its kind to do so (alongside the Galaxy Watch 7).
The Watch’s dual-frequency GPS and powerful heart rate sensor allow it to also pump out accurate fitness tracking data, making it an easy option for anyone who wants the sports focussed approach of a Garmin, but with all the smarts that Wear OS has to offer.
Advertisement
Test Data
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8
OnePlus Watch 3
TicWatch Pro 5
Google Pixel Watch 4
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Full Specs
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Review
OnePlus Watch 3 Review
TicWatch Pro 5 Review
Google Pixel Watch 4 Review
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic Review
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Review
UK RRP
£319
£319
£329.99
£349
£449
£599
USA RRP
$349
–
$349.99
$349
$499
$649
EU RRP
–
–
€359.99
–
–
–
CA RRP
–
–
CA$469.99
–
–
–
AUD RRP
–
–
AU$519.99
–
–
–
Manufacturer
Samsung
OnePlus
Mobvoi
Google
Samsung
Samsung
Screen Size
1.47 inches
1.5 inches
–
1.4 inches
1.34 inches
1.5 inches
IP rating
IP68
IP68
–
IP68
IP68
IP68
Waterproof
5ATM
5ATM
–
5ATM
5ATM
10ATM
Battery
435 mAh
631 mAh
–
455 mAh
445 mAh
590 mAh
Size (Dimensions)
43.7 x 8.6 x 46 INCHES
46.6 x 11.75 x 47.6 MM
x x INCHES
45 x 12.3 x 45 MM
46.4 x 10.6 x 46 MM
x x INCHES
Weight
34 G
81 G
44.3 G
31 G
63.5 G
60.5 G
ASIN
B0F7QD4HSD
–
B0BYS4KJV6
–
–
–
Operating System
OneUI 8 (Wear OS 6)
Wear OS 5/RTOS
–
Wear OS 6 (Material 3 Expressive)
Wear OS 6
Wear OS 5
Release Date
2025
2025
2023
2025
2025
2024
First Reviewed Date
09/07/2025
18/02/2025
07/07/2023
08/10/2025
29/07/2025
10/07/2024
Colours
Graphite, Silver
Black, Silver/Green
–
Obsidian, Porcelain, Lemongrass, Iris, Moonstone
Black, White
Silver, Grey, White
GPS
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Yes
Yes
Advertisement
Can you use Wear OS smartwatches with iPhone?
Smartwatches sporting Wear OS 3 or above do not work with iPhones, but some Wear OS 2 wearables still offer up connectivity with iOS.
Lamborghini recently unveiled the Fenomeno Roadster, their most powerful open-top convertible yet. Built in a limited run of only 15 units at $5.8+ million each, this car takes the latest Lamborghini hybrid V12 technology and throws the roof, giving drivers a raw taste of speed and the unmistakable roar of the engine.
The design team entirely reimagined the body for life in the open air. A carbon fibre spoiler sits boldly above that flat, slab-like windshield, ready to channel air like a pro right over the cockpit and down into the engine bay, keeping the V12 nice and cool. The rollover bars come up behind the seats and fold neatly into elevated humps designed to reduce turbulence and wind noise. They preserved the sharp chiseled design and large intakes up front, while a deep diffuser and active wing join up at the back to provide nearly the same downforce and stability as their coupe brother.
BUILD 2 SUPERCARS – Young racing enthusiasts ages 10 years old and up can construct the LEGO Speed Champions Lamborghini Revuelto & Huracán STO…
AUTHENTIC LAMBORGHINI DETAILS – Kids can recreate signature design elements including aggressive air intakes, aerodynamic wings, and iconic Y-shaped…
2 DRIVER MINIFIGURES – Each buildable Lamborghini model car comes with a driver minifigure wearing a dedicated outfit and helmet for thrilling race…
Lamborghini finished this beast in a deep, rich Blu Cepheus blue with Rosso Mars red highlights, paying homage to the colors of Bologna and the ’68 Miura Roadster, one of the company’s original open-top classics. A 6.5-liter naturally aspirated V12 engine powers three electric motors and a 7-kilowatt-hour battery. The complete setup produces a whopping 1,065 horsepower. Meanwhile, the V12 produces 824 horsepower at 9,250 rpm and 535 pound-feet of torque at 6,750 rpm, which is sent to all four wheels via an eight-speed dual-clutch transmission, with electric motors providing instant torque fill and vectoring for even sharper handling.
Straight-line performance is unexpectedly similar to the closed-top version: 0-62 mph in 2.4 seconds, 0-124 mph in 6.8 seconds, and a top speed of 211 mph. While the battery allows you to speed about town for a few miles in EV-only mode, don’t get too thrilled, since the system is primarily there to improve overall output and assist fulfill emissions rules.
The engineers kept the chassis rigidity roughly comparable to the coupe. To get there, they used a really advanced multi-technology carbon fiber monocoque with aerospace-grade structure and forged composite pieces up front. They added additional reinforcements to make things rock-solid, and there are only a few extra kilograms to worry about. The shock absorbers are manual and adjustable, allowing you to customize ride height and damping for both street driving and track days. They’ve also installed unique carbon-ceramic brakes with specific ventilation and super-durable pads, designed to stop repeatedly at high speeds.
Bridgestone’s bespoke Potenza tires measure 265/30 ZRF21 in the front and 355/25 ZRF22 in the rear. You can choose your tire setup: ultra-high-performance street rubber or semi-slick compounds that are nevertheless completely road-legal.
The cabin features the same pilot-inspired layout that Lamborghini is known for. Every surface is covered in carbon fibre and unique textiles, and the seats hold you and your passenger firmly in place while you’re cornering hard. Three screens present your data in pristine hexagonal graphics that match every interior feature and part of the outside trim. Haptic controls and aviation-style switches keep everything in easy reach.
Instead of waiting for patch cycles, admins could simply shut down vulnerable functions before attackers get there
Linux kernel maintainers are considering giving admins a giant red emergency button to smash the next time another nasty vulnerability drops before patches are ready.
The proposed feature, named “Killswitch,” would let admins temporarily disable specific vulnerable kernel functions at runtime instead of sitting around waiting for fixes. The so-called patch was submitted by Linux stable kernel co-maintainer and Nvidia engineer Sasha Levin after a bruising couple of weeks for Linux security.
Advertisement
The proposal basically gives admins a way to pull the plug on vulnerable kernel functionality. If exploit code starts spreading before patches arrive, the targeted function can be disabled so calls to it immediately fail instead of reaching the vulnerable code.
“When a (security) issue goes public, fleets stay exposed until a patched kernel is built, distributed, and rebooted into,” Levin wrote. “For many such issues the simplest mitigation is to stop calling the buggy function. Killswitch provides that.”
The past couple of weeks have not exactly been great advertising for the traditional “wait for patches” approach.
First we saw the disclosure of CopyFail, a Linux local privilege escalation bug that quickly moved from disclosure to active exploitation. Days later, Dirty Frag emerged: another Linux privilege escalation flaw with public exploit code and no official fixes, after coordinated disclosure efforts fell apart before patches were ready.
Advertisement
As Levin’s proposal itself puts it, organizations are often left exposed “until a patched kernel is built, distributed, and rebooted into.” Killswitch aims to fill that gap.
Killswitch would work through the kernel’s security interface and is mainly intended for subsystems that systems can survive without for a while. In practical terms, Levin’s argument is that temporarily losing some networking or crypto functionality is preferable to leaving known vulnerable code exposed on production systems.
However, the feature would not fix vulnerable code or replace it with safe code. It just slams the door shut on the dangerous bit until administrators can properly update their kernels.
Naturally, handing sysadmins the ability to selectively shoot pieces of the kernel in the head has already sparked debate among developers over stability, potential for abuse, and whether people can be trusted not to accidentally saw off important limbs in production.
Advertisement
Still, after CopyFail and Dirty Frag, the kernel community increasingly seems to be arriving at the conclusion that running broken functionality may now be preferable to running weaponized functionality. ®
Apple will tweak Liquid Glass in macOS 27, a new report claims
The changes aim to fix the most pertinent criticisms leveled at the design
But they will be limited in scope and won’t fundamentally alter Liquid Glass
It’s safe to say that Apple’s Liquid Glass redesign has proven to be controversial, and nowhere is that more the case than in macOS 26. But despite Apple apparently doubling down on its commitment to the glassy user interface, it seems that the company is willing to make some concessions to improve the fit and finish of its operating system.
That’s what’s been reported in Bloomberg journalist Mark Gurman’s latest Power On newsletter. There, Gurman pointed out that in several aspects of macOS — particularly those featuring sidebars or dense concentrations of text — Liquid Glass textures “reduce text clarity or create interface confusion.” That’s something that Apple is allegedly setting out to address in macOS 27, which will be revealed at the company’s Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) on June 8.
This “slight redesign” will come with fixes for “shadows and transparency quirks,” Gurman claims. This could help to address some of the most pressing concerns surrounding Liquid Glass in macOS 26, where glassy surfaces and textures often make text blurry and difficult to read.
Latest Videos From
However, Gurman is adamant that “Liquid Glass itself isn’t going away,” and is instead merely being “refined.” “The goal is more of a cleanup and refinement effort aligned with the company’s wider push to polish its software this year,” he said, adding that similarly small-scale changes are coming to iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 at the same time.
Advertisement
A ‘not-completely-baked’ implementation
(Image credit: Apple / Future)
Interestingly, Gurman includes a sort of half-admission from his Apple sources that the company isn’t entirely happy with Liquid Glass. Speaking of the upcoming changes to the design, Gurman says they are “meant to make Liquid Glass look the way Apple’s design team intended it to from the start. Last year’s operating systems didn’t necessarily suffer from design problems, I’m told, but rather a not-completely-baked implementation from Apple’s software engineering team.”
It says a lot that even Apple’s internal staff are somewhat dissatisfied with Liquid Glass. The design overhaul has taken a battering online, with loud and frequent criticism being leveled at its aesthetic sensibilities and its effect on readability. But with no official word from Apple, we’ve been left to guess how the company feels about its creation.
Still, while Gurman indicates that Apple isn’t entirely pleased with Liquid Glass, the fact that the rumored changes are limited in scope suggests that Apple still believes it is heading in the right direction. The move fits in well with the overhaul objectives for Apple’s “27” software releases, which are rumored to focus much more on tweaks and refinements than wide-ranging changes and new features.
Advertisement
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Aside from fixing Liquid Glass and improving overall performance, Apple is also expected to bring much-delayed Siri features to its Apple Intelligence artificial intelligence (AI) system. If it’s able to do that and make Liquid Glass a little easier on the eyes, it will have gone some way to addressing two of the most significant software problems to have befallen the company in the last few years.
Mobile photography used to be about taking the least muddied photo, but that’s not the case anymore. Smartphone photography is getting better every year, thanks to phones like the OPPO Find X9 Ultra. And OPPO clearly wants to be at the center of that movement in India. The company has now announced a new Filmmaker Accelerator Program, in collaboration with Warner Bros. Discovery, as part of its newly launched OPPO LUMO Creator Program. The initiative is aimed at emerging Indian creators and focuses heavily on short-form mobile storytelling.
OPPO Wants Creators to “Meet Culture Anew”
This year marks the third edition of OPPO’s Culture in a Shot initiative. Previous themes focused on documenting traditions and celebrations, but the 2026 edition shifts toward something broader. The new theme, “Meet Culture Anew, Make Your Moment,” focuses on how younger creators reinterpret culture through everyday moments, fashion, food, travel, and digital expression.
The centerpiece here is the Filmmaker Accelerator Program, which OPPO and Discovery are positioning as a proper mentorship pipeline for young creators. Selected participants will receive guidance from industry professionals across storytelling, filming, and post-production. OPPO will also provide access to its latest smartphones and creator grants.
Speaking on the matter, Goldee Patnaik, Head of Communications at OPPO India, said
At OPPO, we believe technology should empower people to tell stories that matter.‘Culture in a Shot’ reflects our belief that culture is living, evolving, and best expressed through real people and everyday moments. With the introduction of a dedicated video category this year, we aim to inspire a new generation of creators to tell powerful stories through short-form visual content and share them with the world.
The biggest winner gets:
Advertisement
₹5 lakh cash prize
An OPPO Find X9 Ultra smartphone
An opportunity to direct a collaborative short film with OPPO x Discovery later this year
Official recognition across OPPO India platforms
To participate, creators need to upload original videos on Instagram, 30 seconds to 10 minutes long, using hashtags such as #OPPOxDiscovery, #CultureInAShot, and #ShotOnOPPO. The contest runs from May 5 to July 15, 2026.
Today, Explained host Sean Rameswaram talked to tech writer and journalist James Vincent — who wrote a Harper’s Magazine cover story titled “Kicking Robots” — about the humanoid robot hype and how much of its promise can actually be realized.
Advertisement
Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify.
James, you’ve had the distinct privilege of doing something most of us still haven’t done — you got to meet a bunch of robots. How many robots did you meet?
I lost count after the first few, I’ll be honest. I met a few from two of the leading companies in the US. One is called Apptronik and another is called Agility Robotics. They make two very different styles of robot. They’re both humanoids in that they resemble a human — arms, legs, etc. — but Agility is very much focused on the warehouse and their robots look a little bit more inhuman. They have those backward-facing knees. Apptronik makes a more general purpose robot that looks much more like a human in terms of normal body proportion, it stands upright, and you look it eye to eye — or eye to unblinking robot eye, whatever that might be.
I got to meet them, shake hands. I played ick-ack-ock, as rock paper scissors is sometimes called in the UK. And I also — this was my heart’s content, I so wanted to do this — I wanted to kick a robot. I have that burning urge inside me that I want to get my own back before they obviously take over the world.
Advertisement
So the robots were nice to you, but you weren’t that nice to them.
Oh, I was horrible. I was terrible. They’re going to be coming for me in the future. I have no doubt about that at all.
They didn’t actually let me kick a robot, I’m very sad to say. They said it might be a bit of a safety hazard, so I got to poke one very hard with a big stick instead. And that was the next best thing.
No, it didn’t. This was the creepy thing about it. They gave me this very high-tech stick, which was I think a broom handle with a bit of safety foam taped on the end of it. And they said, “Give it a shove, give it a punt. See how hard you can push it.” And I was very nervous about this because they told me that this was one of the prototype humanoids. It was worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. And if I knock it down and it breaks, that’s great copy, but it’s also the end of my access to this company. They’re not going to be pleased.
Advertisement
I gave it a shove and it wobbled, and they were like, “No, you can do it harder than that.” I gave it as hard as I could. It staggered backwards and threw its arms up in the air as it regained its equilibrium. It was just such an uncanny moment to see a robot mimic so perfectly, to my eyes, the movements of a human. I remember doing this and having it stagger backwards and then trot back up to me, look me right in the face, and I was like, “Oh gosh, these things are real.”
What are humanoid robots meant to do, James?
If you believe the pitch decks and the hype men, they’re meant to do anything that an able-bodied human can do. They’re meant to slot right into the workplace, sort packages, bolt on car doors, anything and everything. This is the pitch. This is why they are built like humans. They want them to do anything that a human laborer can do. And that’s a big ask.
Who’s asking the robots to do it all right now?
Advertisement
A lot of companies in the US and in China, mainly. These are the two leaders in the robotics space. It used to be mainly startups, but now we’re seeing more of the big tech companies move into this space as well.
Meta recently bought a robotic startup. Google has been doing stuff with robots for ages. It’s been testing its AI out on them. And Tesla — it’s Elon Musk’s obsession, alongside colonizing Mars. He thinks that Optimus, which is the name of Tesla’s robot, is going to be the most productive, the most profitable product ever invented. I think this is typical Muskian hyperbole. But his interest is something that has moved the market hugely. And when he got involved, a lot of companies followed suit.
Why is it that we’re seeing more of this stuff? Is it just because there are more robots now?
The big reason for why we’re having this moment for humanoids at the moment is AI. The ChatGPT boom and deep learning have enabled large language models or chatbots. A lot of people have thought that this is a transferable technology that we can plug into humanoid machines and other machines and it can learn in the same way that chatbots have been able to learn and to reproduce human speech.
Advertisement
The big thing that they’re depending on is that robots in the past had to be programmed manually. You had to say, “Move your arm here, down this many degrees, across like this, and apply this much pressure.” What you have with the new form of AI is that it learns these lessons by itself. You plug in a lot of data, you give it an output that you want, and it learns how to connect those pieces together.
These companies hope that if we get enough data, we will “solve the problem of physical robotics” and we will have these machines that are multidexterous and capable of all these different tasks.
The big criticism of that is that robots are not in the same world as chatbots. Chatbots are dealing with text. You talk to a chatbot even today and it will still make mistakes every now and again. When those mistakes are transferred to the physical world, they suddenly become a lot more potentially dangerous.
A big thing that a lot of companies are doing at the moment is they’re saying, “We’re going to put these robots in the home. They are going to be the perfect robot butler and they will take care of your dishes and your laundry and all the rest of it.”
Advertisement
If a chatbot gets something wrong when you’re asking it to do some research, then it’s not the biggest deal in the world. You may spot the error and correct it. If a robot gets something wrong when it is cleaning away your plates and dishes, if it breaks one in every 10 cups, are you going to be happy with that quality? No, I don’t think so.
Is the way China’s developing these machines different from the way we are?
I would say that the main difference is that China’s doing it faster and better. I think there is more of a focus in the US on home products as a marketing tool to the rich and saying, “Look, we can take care of all these chores for you.”
In China, you have what is one of the fastest aging populations in the world. People over 60 are predicted to be 30 percent of the population by 2040. So you have a loss of manufacturing labor and you have an increased burden on social care. I think for Chinese state planners, humanoid robotics could very much plug into both of those gaps at the same time.
Advertisement
There is a slightly different focus, but it is one that is organic in terms of the advantages of the Chinese economy. The big thing that the Chinese economy has that the US doesn’t is scale. It has a massive ability to manufacture these units. It can make thousands at a time. This is why China is pulling ahead.
You spent a lot of time in your piece trying to suss out the hype versus the reality. Where do you land? Is this going to be our reality within a few years or is this more like flying cars?
I think it’s nearer to flying cars than it is to the chatbot side of things. We’ve seen really rapid advances. There has been a legitimate leap forward in terms of capabilities. However, that does not mean that we are matching the hype that is being pushed out by people like Elon Musk and other leading companies who are saying, “We’re going to have one of these robots in your house next year and it’s going to be doing all the chores you need and it’ll never make a mistake and it certainly won’t fall over and kill your cat.”
I think those promises are just not true. I can see humanoid robots becoming a more common presence within both the work and the home over the next 10-plus years. But in the next five years, in the next three years, I really doubt it.
Client’s handy automations get grayed out unless you know the keyboard shortcut
If you’re using Quick Steps in Microsoft Outlook and
wondering why they’re grayed out, a bug introduced in version 2512 is the culprit.
Classic Outlook is approaching the
twilight years of
its prodigiously long life, but users can still fall victim to productivity-killing bugs – in this case, a problem with Quick Steps.
Advertisement
Quick Steps automates common or repetitive tasks in Outlook. Always have
to move a bunch of messages to a specific folder? Quick Steps is your friend.
Pin an email and mark it as unread? Again, the actions can be lined up in Quick
Steps and executed with a single click or a keyboard shortcut.
Until Microsoft breaks it.
In a support article,
Microsoft has confirmed that in some situations, Quick Steps in classic Outlook
can appear grayed out. The workaround (if rolling back or switching clients isn’t an option) is to use a keyboard shortcut. “The shortcut will work even if the Quick Step is grayed out in the
user interface,” Microsoft wrote.
The problem is that if a Quick Step
contains actions that “can’t be fulfilled,” it’s grayed out. Microsoft’s own the example states: “A Quick Step that moves a message to a folder and
clears categories will be grayed out in messages where there are no categories
applied.”
Advertisement
“This is known
to happen with Quick Steps with Flags and Categories actions such as ‘Clear
flags on message’ or ‘Clear categories’.”
Microsoft has been clear that Classic Outlook’s days are numbered. Outlook 2024 is due to drop out of
mainstream support in 2029. However, there remains much that Classic Outlook does which New Outlook
doesn’t, such as COM support.
And, when Microsoft hasn’t broken them, Quick Steps. ®
You must be logged in to post a comment Login