Connect with us

Tech

AstellKern’s doubles down on luxury with its SP4000 music player

Published

on

Astell&Kern is doubling down on the high-end with the launch of its most premium portable music player yet. It also comes with a suitably luxurious way to store it.

The company has unveiled the A&ultima SP4000 Copper, a limited-edition flagship digital audio player. It is launching the SP4000 alongside the Collector’s Atelier, a leather valet designed for serious head-fi collectors.

The headline act here is the SP4000 Copper. It’s based on Astell&Kern’s existing SP4000 platform but rebuilt using 99.98% pure copper. This is a material prized for its audio properties and notoriously difficult to work with.

According to Astell&Kern, the player requires a multi-layer stabilisation process and extremely precise machining to ensure long-term durability. All this is in the name of cleaner signal transfer and better shielding.

Advertisement
AstellKern SP4000 CopperAstellKern SP4000 Copper
Image Credit (Astell&Kern)

Advertisement

Under the hood, it keeps the same class-leading internals as the standard SP4000, including a quad-DAC setup and octa-circuit architecture. However, Astell&Kern says the copper chassis directly shapes the sound with the result described as deeper, more authoritative bass, a richer midrange, and treble that decays more naturally. The device is tuned for listeners who want recordings to sound as close to the original performance as possible.

As you’d expect, exclusivity comes at a price. The A&ultima SP4000 Copper is a limited edition and is available now with a suggested retail price of £3999 / $4499 / €4699.

AstellKern SP4000 Atelier caseAstellKern SP4000 Atelier case
Image Credit (Astell&Kern)

Alongside it, Astell&Kern has introduced the Collector’s Atelier, a premium leather valet designed to house a player, earphones and accessories. It’s made using Perlinger leather, sourced from a German tannery that’s been operating since 1864.

The leather undergoes a specialised shrinking process that preserves its natural grain while improving durability. This means it should age gracefully with use rather than looking worn out. The Collector’s Atelier is available now for £229 / $260.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Rounding out the launch are two previously announced products that are now officially on sale. The AK HC5, a compact USB DAC priced at £399, targets portable listening setups. Meanwhile, STELLA, a reference-grade earphone developed with Volk Audio and Grammy-winning mastering engineer Michael Graves, sits at the very top of Astell&Kern’s in-ear lineup.

Taken together, it’s a clear statement of intent from Astell&Kern. This isn’t about mass appeal — it’s about pushing materials, sound quality and craftsmanship as far as possible for listeners who want the absolute best, even on the move.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

How “Bitcoin Jesus” Avoided Prison, Thanks To One Of The “Friends Of Trump”

Published

on

This story was originally published by ProPublica. Republished under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.

Days into President Donald Trump’s second term in the White House, a cryptocurrency billionaire posted a video on X to his hundreds of thousands of followers. “Please Donald Trump, I need your help,” he said, wearing a flag pin askew and seated awkwardly in an armchair. “I am an American. … Help me come home.” 

The speaker, 46-year-old Roger Ver, was in fact no longer a U.S. citizen. Nicknamed “Bitcoin Jesus” for his early evangelism for digital currency, Ver had renounced his citizenship more than a decade earlier. At the time of his video, Ver was under criminal indictment for millions in tax evasion and living on the Spanish island of Mallorca. His top-flight legal defense team had failed around half a dozen times to persuade the Justice Department to back down. The U.S., considering him a fugitive, was seeking his extradition from Spain, and he was likely looking at prison.

Advertisement

Once, prosecutors hoped to make Ver a marquee example amid concerns about widespread cryptocurrency tax evasion. They had spent eight painstaking years working the case. Just nine months after his direct-to-camera appeal, however, Ver and Trump’s new Justice Department leadership cut a remarkable deal to end his prosecution. Ver wouldn’t have to plead guilty or spend a day in prison. Instead, the government accepted a payout of $49.9 million — roughly the size of the tax bill prosecutors said he dodged in the first place — and allowed him to walk away.

Ver was able to pull off this coup by taking advantage of a new dynamic inside of Trump’s Department of Justice. A cottage industry of lawyers, lobbyists and consultants with close ties to Trump has sprung up to help people and companies seek leniency, often by arguing they had been victims of political persecution by the Biden administration. In his first year, Trump issued pardons or clemency to dozens of people who were convicted of various forms of white-collar crime, including major donors and political allies. Investigations have been halted. Cases have been dropped. 

Within the Justice Department, a select club of Trump’s former personal attorneys have easy access to the top appointees, some of whom also previously represented Trump. It has become a dark joke among career prosecutors to refer to these lawyers as the “Friends of Trump.”

The Ver episode, reported in detail here for the first time, reveals the extent to which white-collar criminal enforcement has eroded under the Trump administration. The account is based on interviews with current and former Justice Department officials, case records and conversations with people familiar with his case.

Advertisement

The Trump administration has particularly upended the way tax law violators are handled. Late last year, the administration essentially dissolved the team dedicated to criminal tax enforcement, dividing responsibility among a number of other offices and divisions. Tax prosecutions fell by more than a quarter, and more than a third of the 80 experienced prosecutors working on criminal tax cases have quit. 

But even amid this turmoil, Ver’s case stands out. After Ver added several of these new power brokers to his team — most importantly, former Trump attorney Chris Kise — Trump appointees commandeered the case from career prosecutors. One newly installed Justice Department leader who had previously represented Trump’s family questioned his new subordinates on whether tax evasion should be a criminal offense. Ver’s team wielded unusual control over the final deal, down to dictating that the agreement would not include the word “fraud.” 

It remains the only tax prosecution the administration has killed outright.

Ver did not reply to an extensive list of questions from ProPublica. In court filings and dealings with the Justice Department, Ver had always denied dodging his tax bill intentionally — a key distinction between a criminal and civil tax violation — and claimed to have relied on the advice of accountants and tax attorneys.

Advertisement

“Roger Ver took full responsibility for his gross financial misconduct to the tune of $50 million because this Department of Justice did not shy away from exposing those who cheat the system. The notion that any defendant can buy their way out of accountability under this administration is not founded in reality,” said Natalie Baldassarre, a Justice Department spokesperson.

In response to a list of detailed questions, the White House referred ProPublica to the Justice Department.“I know of no cases like this,” said Scott Schumacher, a former tax prosecutor and the director of the graduate program in taxation at the University of Washington. It is nearly unheard of for the department to abandon an indicted criminal case years in the making. “They’re basically saying you can buy your way out of a tax evasion prosecution.”


Roger Ver is not a longtime ally of Trump’s or a MAGA loyalist. He renounced his U.S. citizenship in 2014, a day he once called “the happiest day of my entire life.” In the early days of bitcoin, he controlled about 1% of the world’s supply. 

Ver is clean-cut and fit — he has a black belt in Brazilian jujitsu. In his early 20s, while he was a libertarian activist in California, Ver was sentenced to 10 months in prison for illegally selling explosives on eBay. He’s often characterized that first brush with the law as political persecution by the state. After his release, he left the U.S. for Japan.

Advertisement

Ver became a fixture in the 2010s on the budding cryptocurrency conference circuit, where he got a kick out of needling government authority and arguing that crypto was the building block of a libertarian utopia. At a 2017 blockchain conference in Aspen, Colorado, Ver announced he had raised $100 million and was seeking a location to create a new “non-country” without any central government. For years, Ver has recommended other wealthy people consider citizenship in the small Caribbean nation of Saint Kitts and Nevis, which has no individual income tax.

“Bitcoin completely undermines the power of every single government on the entire planet to control the money supply, to tax people’s income to control them in any way,” he told a gathering of anarcho-capitalists in Acapulco, Mexico, in 2016. “It makes it so incredibly easy for people to hide their income or evade taxes.” More than one friend, he said with a smirk, had asked him how to do so: They “say, ‘Roger, I need your help. How do I use bitcoins to avoid paying taxes on it?’”

Renouncing U.S. citizenship isn’t a magic get-out-of-tax-free technique. Since 2008, the U.S. has required expatriates with assets above $2 million pay a steep “exit tax” on the appreciation of all their property.

In 2024, the Justice Department indicted Ver in one of the largest-ever cryptocurrency tax fraud cases. The government accused Ver of lying to the IRS twice. After Ver renounced his citizenship in 2014, he claimed to the IRS that he personally did not own any bitcoin. He would later admit in his deal with the government to owning at least 130,664 bitcoin worth approximately $73.7 million at the time. Then in 2017, the government alleged, Ver tried to conceal the transfer of roughly $240 million in bitcoin from U.S. companies to his personal accounts. In all, the government said he had evaded nearly $50 million in taxes. 

Advertisement

Ver’s defense was that his failure to pay taxes arose from a lack of clarity as to how tax law treated emerging cryptocurrency, good-faith accounting errors and reliance on his advisors’ advice. He claimed it was difficult to distinguish between his personal assets and his companies’ holdings and pinpoint what the bitcoin was actually worth.

The Biden administration’s Justice Department dismissed this legal argument. Prosecutors had troves of emails that they said showed Ver misleading his own attorneys and tax preparers about the extent of his bitcoin holdings. (Ver’s team accused the government of taking his statements out of context.) The asset tracing in the case was “rock solid,” according to a person familiar with the investigation who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. A jury, prosecutors maintained, was unlikely to buy Ver’s defense that he made a good-faith error.

By the time of Trump’s election, Ver had been arrested in Spain and was fighting extradition. He was also the new owner of a sleek $70 million yacht that some law enforcement officials worried he might use to escape on the high seas.

In Trump, Ver saw a possible way out. After the 2024 election, he was “barking up every tree,” said his friend Brock Pierce, a fellow ultrawealthy crypto investor who tried to gin up sympathy for Ver in Trump’s orbit.

Advertisement

Ver had initially gone the orthodox route of hiring tax attorneys from a prestigious law firm, Steptoe. Like many wealthy people in legal jeopardy, Ver now also launched a media blitz seeking a pardon from the incoming president. “If anybody knows what it’s like to be the victim of lawfare it’s Trump, so I think he’ll be able to see it in this case as well,” Ver said in a December 2024 appearance on Tucker Carlson’s show. On Charlie Kirk’s show, Ver appeared with tape over his mouth with the word “censored” written in red ink. Laura Loomer, the Trump-friendly influencer, began posting that Ver’s prosecution was unfair. Ver paid Trump insider Roger Stone $600,000 to lobby Congress for an end to the tax provision he was accused of violating.

Ver’s pardon campaign fizzled. His public pressure campaign — in which he kept comparing himself to Trump — was not landing, according to Pierce. “You aren’t doing yourself any favors — shut up,” his friend recalled saying. 

One objection in the White House, according to a person who works on pardons, may have been Ver’s flamboyant rejection of his American citizenship. Less than a week after Trump was inaugurated, Elon Musk weighed in, posting on X, “Roger Ver gave up his US citizenship. No pardon for Ver. Membership has its privileges.”

But inside the Justice Department, Ver found an opening. The skeleton key proved to be one of the “Friends of Trump,” a seasoned defense lawyer named Christopher Kise. Kise is a longtime Florida Republican power player who served as the state’s solicitor general and has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. He earned a place in Trump’s inner circle as one of the first experienced criminal defenders willing to represent the president after his 2020 election loss. Kise defended Trump in the Justice Department investigation stemming from the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and against charges that Trump mishandled classified documents when leaving the White House.

Advertisement

Kise had worked shoulder-to-shoulder on Trump’s cases with two lawyers who were now leaders in the Trump 2.0 Justice Department: Todd Blanche, who runs day-to-day operations at the department as deputy attorney general, and his associate deputy attorney general, Ketan Bhirud, who oversaw the criminal tax division prosecuting Ver. Kise reportedly helped select Blanche to join Trump’s legal team in the documents case, and he and Bhirud had both worked for Trump’s family as they fought civil fraud charges brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in 2022. 

On Ver’s legal team, Kise worked the phones, pressing his old colleagues to rethink their prosecution against Ver. 

Kise scored the legal team’s first big victory in years: a meeting with Bhirud that cut out the career attorneys most familiar with the merits of the case.

In that meeting, however, it wasn’t clear that the new Justice Department leadership would be willing to interfere with the trajectory of Ver’s case. While the Trump administration had backed off aggressive enforcement of white-collar crimes writ large, the administration said it was still pursuing most criminal cases that had already been charged.

Advertisement

Bhirud initially expressed skepticism that Ver accidentally underpaid his taxes. It was “hard to believe” that a man going by “Bitcoin Jesus” would have no idea how much bitcoin he owned, Bhirud said, according to a person familiar with the case.

Bhirud and Blanche did not respond to detailed questions from ProPublica.

The Justice Department stuck to its position that either Ver would plead guilty to a crime, or the case would go to trial.

But Kise would not stop lobbying his former colleagues to reconsider. Blanche and Bhirud had already demanded that career officials justify the case again and again. Over the course of the summer, Kise wore down the Trump appointees’ zeal for pursuing Ver on criminal charges. 

Advertisement

Kise and the law firm of Steptoe did not respond to questions.

“While there were meetings and conversations with DOJ, that is not uncommon. The line attorneys remained engaged throughout the process, and the case was ultimately resolved based on the strength of the evidence,” said Bryan Skarlatos, one of Ver’s tax attorneys and a partner at Kostelanetz.

It was a chaotic moment at the Justice Department, an institution that Trump had incessantly accused of being “weaponized” against him and his supporters. After Trump took office, the department was flooded with requests to reconsider prosecutions, with defendants claiming the Biden administration had singled them out for political persecution, too.

While many cases failed to grab the administration’s attention, Kise got results. Last week, Kise’s client Julio Herrera Velutini, a Venezuelan-Italian billionaire accused of trying to bribe the former governor of Puerto Rico, received a pardon from Trump.

Advertisement

“Every defense attorney is running the ‘weaponization’ play. This guy gets an audience because of who he is, because his name is Chris Kise,” said a person who recently attended a high-level meeting Kise secured to talk the Justice Department down from prosecuting a client.

As Kise stepped up the pressure, Ver’s case ate up a significant share of Bhirud’s time, despite his job overseeing more than 1,000 Justice Department attorneys, according to people familiar with the matter. Ordinarily, it would be rare for a political appointee to be so involved, especially to the exclusion of career prosecutors who could weigh in on the merits.

Bhirud began to muse to coworkers about whether failure to pay one’s taxes should really be considered a crime. Wasn’t it more of a civil matter? It seemed to a colleague that Bhirud was aware Ver’s advocates could try to elevate the case to the White House.

The government ceded ground and offered to take prison time off the table. Eventually, Ver’s team and Bhirud hit on the deal that would baffle criminal tax experts. They agreed on a deferred prosecution agreement that would allow Ver to avoid criminal charges and prison in exchange for a payout and an agreement not to violate any more laws. The government usually reserves such an agreement for lawbreaking corporations to avoid putting large employers out of business — not for fugitive billionaires.

Advertisement

By the time fall approached, Kise and Bhirud, with Blanche’s blessing, were negotiating Ver’s extraordinary deal line by line. Once more, career prosecutors were cut out from the negotiations.

Ver’s team enjoyed a remarkable ability to dictate terms. They rejected the text of the government’s supposed final offer because it required him to admit to “fraud,” according to a person familiar with the negotiations. In the end, Ver agreed to admit only to a “willful” failure to report and pay taxes on all his bitcoin and turned over the $50 million.

The government arrived at that figure in a roundabout manner. It dropped its claim that Ver had lied on his 2017 tax return. The $50 million figure was based on how much he had evaded in taxes in 2014 alone, plus what the government asserted were interest and penalties. In the end, the deal amounted to the sum he allegedly owed in the first place. He never even had to leave Mallorca to appear in a U.S. court.

Under any previous administration, convincing the leadership of the tax division to drop an indicted criminal case and accept a monetary penalty instead would be a nonstarter. While the Justice Department settles most tax matters civilly through fines, when prosecutors do charge criminal fraud, their conviction rate is over 90%

Advertisement

People “always ask you, ‘Can’t I just pay the taxes and it’ll go away?’” said Jack Townsend, a former DOJ tax attorney. “The common answer that everybody gave — until the Trump administration — was that, no, you can’t do that.”

When the Justice Department announced the resolution in October, it touted it as a victory.

“We are pleased that Mr. Ver has taken responsibility for his past misconduct and satisfied his obligations to the American public,” Bhirud said in the Justice Department’s press release announcing the deferred prosecution agreement. “This resolution sends a clear message: whether you deal in dollars or digital assets, you must file accurate tax returns and pay what you owe.”

Inside the Justice Department, the resolution was demoralizing: “He’s admitted he owes money, and we get money, but everything else about it stinks to high heaven,” said a current DOJ official familiar with the case. “We shouldn’t negotiate with people who are fugitives, as if they have power over us.”

Advertisement

Among the wealthy targets of white-collar criminal investigations, the Ver affair sent a different message. Lawyers who specialize in that kind of work told ProPublica that more and more clients are asking which of the “Friends of Trump” they should hire. One prominent criminal tax defense lawyer said he would give his clients a copy of Ver’s agreement and tell them, “These are the guys who got this done.”

The only one of Ver’s many lawyers to sign it was Christopher Kise.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Google’s Pixel 10a Budget Champion Returns Almost Unchanged

Published

on

Google Pixel 10a Smartphone Reveal
Google has unexpectedly launched the Pixel 10a, and the timing of the release feels unusual this time around. Pre-orders begin on February 18, 2026, far sooner than the Pixel 9a last year, which is perhaps all the more remarkable because it is a trend that will most certainly continue. Google announced the news with a brief YouTube teaser, giving everyone a proper look at the new phone. However, this one feels more like a solid stride forward than a radical reinvention.



At first glance, the teaser appears to follow the current A-series template, but with one change that makes a significant difference: the dual rear cameras are now flush with the back panel, with no raised bump in the way. That means the phone can sit perfectly flat on a table without moving about. Google emphasizes this difference in the video, and it’s likely the only thing you notice when glancing at the phone. The traditional pill-shaped camera housing is still horizontal, with a small LED flash and the Google logo peeking out the bottom. The rounded corners and flat metal edges make the whole item very comfortable to grip, and the matte coating should repel fingerprints far better than a glossy finish.

Sale


Google Pixel 9a with Gemini – Unlocked Android Smartphone with Incredible Camera and AI Photo Editing,…
  • Google Pixel 9a is engineered by Google with more than you expect, for less than you think; like Gemini, your built-in AI assistant[1], the incredible…
  • Take amazing photos and videos with the Pixel Camera, and make them better than you can imagine with Google AI; get great group photos with Add Me and…
  • Google Pixel’s Adaptive Battery can last over 30 hours[2]; turn on Extreme Battery Saver and it can last up to 100 hours, so your phone has power…

The color options are actually rather exciting, as Google showcases a soft lavender shade in the teaser, which is a really pleasant, muted blue-purple color that I believe is a better over the Iris color from last year’s Pixel 9a. According to what we’ve heard so far, those aren’t the only alternatives; there might be a deep black (called Obsidian), a lively red (Berry), and a clean white or light grey (Fog). The aim is that these colors will offer purchasers a sense of personality without being overly bright or wild. That specific blue-purple color looks especially good when the light hits it, since it makes the phone feel like a high-end product that punches beyond its weight.

Advertisement

Google Pixel 10a Smartphone Reveal
Performance expectations are all about building on the foundation laid by the Pixel 9 series, as many reports indicate that the Tensor G4 chip will power the device, and while there are some whispers about a slightly faster version with higher clock speeds to try and improve performance and thermal management, at the end of the day, it’s likely to be a very similar setup to what we’ve seen before, paired with 8GB of RAM. Of course, it should still be able to manage all of your daily chores, some multitasking, and Google’s growing suite of AI features without blinking an eye. Storage options will most likely remain 128GB and 256GB, which may not be the most exciting news for those in need of more storage capacity, but it will be sufficient for the majority of customers.

The display remains 6.3 inches with a 120Hz refresh rate and FHD+ resolution, which is nearly identical to the Pixel 9a. Smoother scrolling and sensitive touch remain priority concerns, and I expect the display to look brilliant in almost any lighting scenario. The battery capacity is likely to be about 5,100mAh, which has routinely provided all-day durability in A-series models. I believe we can still expect fast charging and wireless charging support to round out the package.

Google Pixel 10a Smartphone Reveal
The camera hardware follows a fairly common pattern, with a 48 megapixel primary sensor paired with a 13 megapixel ultrawide lens on the back, a combination seen on a variety of phones. Meanwhile, a 13 megapixel selfie camera handles portraits and video calls, but as usual, Google’s computational photography is what actually makes the difference, transforming somewhat ordinary photos into extremely detailed and balanced shots even in difficult lighting settings. You’ll also get extras like Magic Editor and Best Take, as well as some intriguing new Gemini-powered features that will be available for you straight out of the box, implying that the phone’s capabilities will sometimes appear to be ahead of its real hardware specs.

Pricing isn’t official yet, but all indications are that it will start at $499 for the 128GB model, which coincides with the price of the Pixel 9a. If we trust the leaks coming out of Europe, we’re looking at around €549, which is roughly equivalent to what they charge in the United States. Adding another 256GB to the mix could cost you an additional $50-100, depending on where you live.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Super Mario Bros. Wonder + Meetup In Bellabel Park does the impossible by finally giving Nintendo Switch 2 mouse mode a reason to live

Published

on

At a recent demo event, Nintendo gave me and some peers the chance to try the new Super Mario Bros. Wonder – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Meetup in Bellabel park, which adds a litany of new features that make multiplayer mode a whole lot more fun and launches the game firmly into my best Nintendo Switch 2 games list.

Growing up as an only child, you can develop a real penchant for party games. Sure, you can only play them when your pals come over or with your parents under duress, but being that kid who has cool multiplayer games at home softens the blow of terminal loneliness.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Spain’s Ministry of Science shuts down systems after breach claims

Published

on

Spain's Ministry of Science shuts down systems after breach claims

Spain’s Ministry of Science (Ministerio de Ciencia) announced a partial shutdown of its IT systems, affecting several citizen- and company-facing services.

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades is the Spanish government body responsible for science policy, research, innovation, and higher education.

Among others, it maintains administrative systems used by researchers, universities, and students that handle high-value, sensitive information.

Wiz

The Ministry stated that the decision was in reaction to a “technical incident,” but did not provide additional details. However, a threat actor is claiming an attack on the institution’s systems and published data samples as proof of the breach.

“As a result of a technical incident currently under assessment, the electronic headquarters of the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities has been partially closed,” reads an announcement on the main page of the ministry’s website.

Advertisement

“All ongoing administrative procedures are suspended, while safeguarding the rights and legitimate interests of all persons affected by this temporary closure.”

Notice on the Ministry's website
Notice on the Ministry’s website
Source: BleepingComputer

To mitigate the impact of the disruption, the Ministry will extend all deadlines for affected procedures, in accordance with Article 32 of Law 39/2015.

A threat actor using the alias ‘GordonFreeman’ from the Half-Life game title offered to the highest bidder data allegedly stolen from the Spanish ministry.

The alleged hacker leaked on underground forums data samples that include personal records, email addresses, enrollment applications, and screenshots of documents and other official paperwork.

Threat actor's post
Threat actor’s post
Source: Kela

The threat actor states that they breached Spain’s Ministry of Science by exploiting a critical Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability that gave them valid credentials for “full- admin-level access.”

It’s worth noting that the forum where the information appeared is now offline, and the data has not appeared on alternative platforms yet.

Advertisement

The leaked images appear legitimate, although BleepingComputer has no way to confirm their authenticity or any of the attacker’s other claims. We have contacted Ministerio de Ciencia about these allegations, but a statement wasn’t immediately available.

Meanwhile, Spanish media outlets report that a ministry spokesperson confirmed that the IT systems disruption is related to a cyberattack.

Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.

In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Loyalty Is Dead in Silicon Valley

Published

on

Since the middle of last year, there have been at least three major AI “acqui-hires” in Silicon Valley. Meta invested more than $14 billion in Scale AI and brought on its CEO, Alexandr Wang; Google spent a cool $2.4 billion to license Windsurf’s technology and fold its cofounders and research teams into DeepMind; and Nvidia wagered $20 billion on Groq’s inference technology and hired its CEO and other staffers.

The frontier AI labs, meanwhile, have been playing a high stakes and seemingly never-ending game of talent musical chairs. The latest reshuffle began three weeks ago, when OpenAI announced it was rehiring several researchers who had departed less than two years earlier to join Mira Murati’s startup, Thinking Machines. At the same time, Anthropic, which was itself founded by former OpenAI staffers, has been poaching talent from the ChatGPT maker. OpenAI, in turn, just hired a former Anthropic safety researcher to be its “head of preparedness.”

The hiring churn happening in Silicon Valley represents the “great unbundling” of the tech startup, as Dave Munichiello, an investor at GV, put it. In earlier eras, tech founders and their first employees often stayed onboard until either the lights went out or there was a major liquidity event. But in today’s market, where generative AI startups are growing rapidly, equipped with plenty of capital, and prized especially for the strength of their research talent, “you invest in a startup knowing it could be broken up,” Munichiello told me.

Early founders and researchers at the buzziest AI startups are bouncing around to different companies for a range of reasons. A big incentive for many, of course, is money. Last year Meta was reportedly offering top AI researchers compensation packages in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, offering them not just access to cutting-edge computing resources but also … generational wealth.

Advertisement

But it’s not all about getting rich. Broader cultural shifts that rocked the tech industry in recent years have made some workers worried about committing to one company or institution for too long, says Sayash Kapoor, a computer science researcher at Princeton University and a senior fellow at Mozilla. Employers used to safely assume that workers would stay at least until the four-year mark when their stock options were typically scheduled to vest. In the high-minded era of the 2000s and 2010s, plenty of early cofounders and employees also sincerely believed in the stated missions of their companies and wanted to be there to help achieve them.

Now, Kapoor says, “people understand the limitations of the institutions they’re working in, and founders are more pragmatic.” The founders of Windsurf, for example, may have calculated their impact could be larger at a place like Google that has lots of resources, Kapoor says. He adds that a similar shift is happening within academia. Over the past five years, Kapoor says, he’s seen more PhD researchers leave their computer-science doctoral programs to take jobs in industry. There are higher opportunity costs associated with staying in one place at a time when AI innovation is rapidly accelerating, he says.

Investors, wary of becoming collateral damage in the AI talent wars, are taking steps to protect themselves. Max Gazor, the founder of Striker Venture Partners, says his team is vetting founding teams “for chemistry and cohesion more than ever.” Gazor says it’s also increasingly common for deals to include “protective provisions that require board consent for material IP licensing or similar scenarios.”

Gazor notes that some of the biggest acqui-hire deals that have happened recently involved startups founded long before the current generative AI boom. Scale AI, for example, was founded in 2016, a time when the kind of deal Wang negotiated with Meta would have been unfathomable to many. Now, however, these potential outcomes might be considered in early term sheets and “constructively managed,” Gazor explains.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

We Are Rewind WE-001 Review

Published

on

Verdict

If you have a certain nostalgia for the warmth and saturation of the sound of cassettes, the We Are Rewind WE-001 is a fine choice. It looks lovely in the bright orange colourway, plus modern conveniences such as a USB-C rechargeable battery and Bluetooth connectivity are welcome to bring it into the 21st century. Granted, it doesn’t sound as great as modern streaming does, but then again, that’s not the point, and if you’re considering the WE-001, you know that already.


  • Hefty aluminium chassis

  • Bluetooth pairing is easy, and works decently well

  • The warmth and saturated feel of a cassette has a strange appeal

  • Not the most portable of players

  • No auto-stop function is a shame

Key Features


  • It plays cassettes


    A modern way of playing albums, or your old mixtapes


  • Bluetooth 5.1

    Advertisement


    You can wirelessly stream to a set of headphones or a speaker

Introduction

The We Are Rewind WE-001 seeks to provide a modern outlet for the resurgence of cassettes that’s currently happening.

In the UK, cassette sales soared to a 20-year high in 2025, with a total sales volume of 164,000 units, making now a good time to pick up a cassette player to play them on.

There are folks who have modernised the cassette player with features such as a built-in battery, USB-C charging and even Bluetooth connectivity. French firm We Are Rewind are one of the frontrunners with this fetching WE-001 model.

Advertisement

Advertisement

At £129 / $159, the WE-001 has a reasonable cost to it, and draws two immediate comparisons. For one, it sits close to what you’d pay for a second-hand Walkman; and secondly, it’s not too far off capable budget music players, including the five-star FiiO JM21 and HiBy R3 II.

Is this player from We Are Rewind a novelty item? I’ve dug out some cassettes and put it through its paces to find out.

Design

  • Hefty aluminium frame
  • Fetching orange colourway
  • Tactile controls

The WE-001 is a bit big in weight and size, tipping the scales at 404g, and significantly bigger than the last run of cassette players when the likes of Sony were manufacturing them.

Part of the reason this We Are Rewind player is so large is that there’s only one real cassette mechanism available these days from one supplier, and if you want to build a modern cassette player, it’s the only one to use.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Inner Mechanism - We Are Rewind WE-001Inner Mechanism - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Another reason it’s as big as it is because the design of this orange lad is based on Sony’s first-ever Walkman cassette player – the TPS-L2 – from 1979. Where Sony’s was plastic, the WE-001 is aluminium, contributing both to a quality feel in-hand and to its heavyweight nature.

There’s a pleasant We Are Rewind logo on the front, plus a small circular window in the door that you have to manually open from the top. The old Sony it’s based on had a rectangular window, for what it’s worth. On the top side are the cassette player’s controls, which are oddly the wrong way around as you look at the player, as indicated by the play button triangle facing to the right, so you have to turn the unit around.

Controls - We Are Rewind WE-001Controls - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The controls from left to right in the correct orientation are as follows – battery and Bluetooth pairing indicator LEDs, a Bluetooth pairing button, a yellow record button, play, rewind, fast forward and stop. The buttons aren’t soft-touch and have a pleasant tactile finish when pressed

The right side houses the WE-001’s ports, with a USB-C port for charging (charging only, and no power for an external USB-C DAC such as the iFi Go Link Max for listening to higher power wired headphones), two 3.5mm headphone jacks – one for recording and the other for listening, plus a volume wheel. The rear of the unit also has a small hole for motor speed adjustment.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Ports & Volume Wheel - We Are Rewind WE-001Ports & Volume Wheel - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It looks fetching in the ‘Serge’ orange colour (named for Serge Gainsbourg) I have, although is available in ‘Kurt’ (Cobain – light blue) and ‘Keith’ (Richards – black) colours if you prefer, plus special editions for Elvis and Duran Duran in more recent times.

Specification

  • Bluetooth 5.1 support with no specific codec mentioned
  • Headphone jack is suitable for easy-to-drive, low impedance cans
  • Reasonable battery life

The WE-001’s spec sheet is threadbare, but there are some things worth talking about. It works with all kinds of cassettes, with Type I through IV all supported. Any tapes you have should be okay, all being well.

The cassette player features a 30Hz to 12500Hz frequency range, and supports Bluetooth 5.1. No specific codec support is listed whether it’s SBC or AAC, or even something more advanced, such as aptX HD. Quite frankly, the fact that it supports Bluetooth in any guise seems like a bit of a novelty, but it paired okay with both my Focal Bathys and Audio Pro C10 MKII during testing.

Profile - We Are Rewind WE-001Profile - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

The spec sheet is also very specific about this cassette player not being ‘compatible’ with earbuds, although I also used a pair of FiiO FH19 IEMs with the WE-001 and they worked fine. Maybe it goes against We Are Rewind’s advice, but I am a rebel at heart.

The output of the headphone jack isn’t powerful, with 2mW per channel into 32 ohms, making this We Are Rewind cassette player suitable for easy-to-drive headphones, rather than more difficult ones that would usually need their own amp or DAC.

That being said, I did try to use a set of Drop x Sennheiser HD6XXs for a reference point, and they worked – I just had to turn the volume up a lot to get to a listenable volume. You’re better off going for easier-to-drive ones for a more optimal experience, though.

Advertisement
Inner Mechanism - We Are Rewind WE-001Inner Mechanism - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

As opposed to running on AA batteries as cassette players of old did, the WE-001 features its own built-in lithium ion battery that’s rechargeable. It has a 2000mAh capacity, and We Are Rewind quotes it for between ten and 12 hours on a charge. In my testing, that seems about right.

Performance

  • Warmer tones than streaming
  • Compression and saturation seem part of the experience
  • Auto-stop would have been nice

Advertisement

Normally, when reviewing audio gear and such, it can be very easy to be analytical and scientific as to how a product sounds, with lots of jargon thrown around. I’m as guilty of that as the next man.

With the WE-001, though, it felt right to take a different approach for a key reason. Cassettes weren’t the be-all-and-end-all of fidelity when they were new, and using them again in 2026 is more of an experiential undertaking than a scientific one. Therefore, it warrants a different kind of perspective.

For testing, I took an album I know like the back of my hand (and ironically one of the only cassettes I own), an Abbey Road real-time cassette copy of Marillion’s Afraid of Sunlight that I suspect hasn’t been played for thirty years since the album’s release, and listened to it all the way through on the WE-001 on my Focal Bathys via the 3.5mm jack. I then listened to the original 1995 mix using my Honor Magic V3 and an iFi Go Link Max I had lying around over Tidal for a ‘modern’ equivalent.

Profile With Cassette - We Are Rewind WE-001Profile With Cassette - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Naturally, listening to it in digital results in a cleaner, more expansive recording than the analogue form a cassette takes. The apparent benefit of listening to cassette are the very shortcomings that caused us to move to hi-res digital music when the option became available – the warmth and saturation of an analogue sound, complete with some very slight tape hiss in the background.

It’s a completely different listening experience with Afraid of Sunlight on cassette to even CD or a streaming version due to the warmth of the medium. Granted, the soundstage isn’t too wide, and things can sound quite congested against listening on digital means, but there is a strange appeal to it. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

The WE-001 is quite a meaty player in itself, with its tuning prioritising some low end, even though it only goes down to 30Hz. The potent bass line on Cannibal Surf Babe and the gritty guitar lines are quite prominent throughout the track, suit the way this player sounds, and there was a strange satisfaction to listen to it in this compressed means. Maybe it’s the weird nostalgia for a medium I didn’t experience first time around talking, but it’s an interesting point.

Profile In Hand - We Are Rewind WE-001Profile In Hand - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It isn’t a fatiguing listen either, arguably due to some treble elements, such as cymbal hits and piano notes being smoothed over. This tape player doesn’t have any form of Dolby Noise Reduction built in, although I didn’t necessarily hear much in the way of tape hiss or speed variations with the Afraid of Sunlight tape, or another Abbey Road tape of Fish’s Vigil in a Wilderness of Mirrors.

What listening to cassettes in the way they were intended does is revive the linearity of music that I think has been lost with the age of instant access provided by streaming. If you went out and bought an album, that’s what you listened to, rather than getting bored with it halfway through and finding something else.

In addition, you purchased and owned an album for one price, and that’s what you had to listen to, rather than paying a monthly subscription fee for thousands of albums that you’re paying for the chance to listen to, as long as you keep payments rolling. Therefore, you were more inclined to listen to the full duration of what you’d spent hard-earned money on, which I think is slowly becoming a lost art. It’s nice to be reminded of that experience.

Advertisement
Profile - We Are Rewind WE-001Profile - We Are Rewind WE-001
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Maybe it’s because of my older-leaning tastes, but as much as I have a ridiculous playlist of several thousand songs on Spotify and Tidal that gets put on every so often, I do listen to music in album-sized chunks, which I know a lot of folks my age don’t. That workflow didn’t necessarily change when using this We Are Rewind player in my experience, but it just provided more of an analogue feel that I can partially see the appeal of.

One small nitpick I have with the WE-001 is the lack of an auto-stop for either fast-forwarding or rewinding when the cassette has reached either end of its tape, leading to a horrible motor whine from the internal mechanism. This would have been helpful for quality-of-life purposes and for safeguarding your tapes.

Should you buy it?

You want a feature-rich, portable cassette deck in 2026

Advertisement

The We Are Rewind WE-001 is one of a handful of cassette players designed for the modern age, and I’d argue it’s the most stylish and convenient.

Advertisement

You don’t necessarily have any reason to listen to cassettes

You obviously need some form of reason for going back and listening to cassettes, and even if you’re curious, I’d probably still stick to other means for absolute fidelity if it were me.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

If you have a certain nostalgia for the warmth and saturation of the sound of cassettes, the We Are Rewind WE-001 is a fine choice. It looks lovely in the bright orange colourway, plus modern conveniences such as a USB-C rechargeable battery and Bluetooth connectivity are welcome to bring it into the 21st century.

Granted, it doesn’t sound as great as modern streaming does, but then again, that’s not the point, and if you’re considering the WE-001, you know that already.

Similar money can buy you some lovely digital audio players and potent headphone outputs, such as the FiiO JM21 and HiBy R3 II, both of which I own and use on a daily basis for having such a large local music library, and having a separate device for listening to music that won’t be interrupted by an onslaught of notifications.

But if you want the fun and nostalgia of a cassette above all and the freedom to connect it to modern equipment, this is a fun device above all. And we do need some more of that.

Advertisement

How We Test

I tested the We Are Rewind WE-001 for a week, listening to a selection of cassette albums and comparing to the modern equivalent. I used a range of headphones, over- and in-ear, and connected the player to a Bluetooth speaker to judge playback quality.

  • Tested for a week
  • Tested with real-world use

Advertisement

FAQs

What types of cassettes does the We Are Rewind WE-001 support?

The We Are Rewind WE-001 supports all types of cassette, with Type I through IV all supported.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  We Are Rewind WE-001 Review
UK RRP £129
USA RRP $159
Manufacturer
Battery 2000 mAh
Size (Dimensions) 88.8 x 140.8 x 33.5 MM
Weight 404 G
ASIN B0C6B2937N
Release Date 2023
First Reviewed Date 08/01/2026
Resolution x
Connectivity Bluetooth 5.1, 3.5mm jack
Colours Orange, Black, Blue
Audio Formats Cassette
Touch Screen No
USB charging Yes
Inputs 3.5mm jack for recording
Outputs 3.5mm jack for output, Bluetooth 5.1

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Fresh iPhone 17e & iPad leak points to incremental upgrades

Published

on

New chips, not new designs, will define Apple’s next entry-level iPad and iPhone 17e as the company advances its entry-level lineup incrementally.

Two stacked white smartphones shown from the side, highlighting slim flat edges, buttons, a single rear camera, and a colorful glowing screen on the lower phoneThe iPhone 17e may well look exactly like its predecessor

A report from MacOtakara published on February 6 says Apple plans to keep the current designs for both devices while upgrading their processors. The report reinforces a familiar pattern in Apple’s lineup, where entry-level models advance through internal improvements rather than visible redesigns.
MacOtakara is a long-running Apple rumor site with solid supply-chain access and a track record that, while mixed, is generally reliable.
Rumor Score: 🤔 Possible
Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Pixel Buds 2a are back down to their Black Friday best price

Published

on

If you’re in need of a budget-friendly pair of wireless earbuds that don’t skimp on features then look no further than the Pixel Buds 2a.

These wireless earbuds Pixel Buds 2a were designed with one specific goal in mind: to provide a compact, lightweight pair of earbuds that you can adjust to suit your needs.

And now, the Buds 2a are now back to £99, dropping from the RRP of £129, with a £30 saving today.

That’s back to their Black Friday price, so if you missed the discount first time again, you’ve got a second chance.

Advertisement
Deal Google Pixel Buds 2a HazelDeal Google Pixel Buds 2a Hazel

Pixel Buds 2a are back down to their Black Friday best price

The return of the Google Pixel Buds 2a to their Black Friday low is great deal not to be missed.

View Deal

For instance, despite the Pixel Buds 2a weighing a mere 4.3g each, Google’s included active noise cancellation within the design to filter out any unwanted background noise in favour of what you’re hearing through the buds.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The ANC is surprisingly effective for such a budget device, but it can be evened out to meet your preferences.

The buds themselves have a lightweight and comfortable fit, easily slipping into the contours of your ears . They even boast a degree of water resistance so you can feel confident in wearing them in light showers or during a tough workout.

You can even use a Pixel phone to can get real-time Google Assistant updates on your commute, or have some relaxing music to listen to when you’re trying to drown out the sound of London Underground.

The Whatsapp LogoThe Whatsapp Logo

Get Updates Straight to Your WhatsApp

Join Now

Advertisement

And because these pods integrate with Google’s Gemini voice assistant, you don’t need to reach for your phone when controlling the Pixel Buds 2a either. Want to change the song? Just ask Gemini to do it. Need to turn up the volume? Again, Gemini has you covered.

Battery life is also competitive here, with up to 20-hours when ANC is engaged, so you’ll always be set to get you through a day’s work.

Advertisement

They might not have quite the same level of feature parity with Apple’s AirPods, but for what the Pixel Buds 2a offer, they’re a better buy for users of the Google ecosystem.

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

OpenAI is hoppin’ mad about Anthropic’s new Super Bowl TV ads

Published

on

On Wednesday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Chief Marketing Officer Kate Rouch complained on X after rival AI lab Anthropic released four commercials, two of which will run during the Super Bowl on Sunday, mocking the idea of including ads in AI chatbot conversations. Anthropic’s campaign seemingly touched a nerve at OpenAI just weeks after the ChatGPT maker began testing ads in a lower-cost tier of its chatbot.

Altman called Anthropic’s ads “clearly dishonest,” accused the company of being “authoritarian,” and said it “serves an expensive product to rich people,” while Rouch wrote, “Real betrayal isn’t ads. It’s control.”

Anthropic’s four commercials, part of a campaign called “A Time and a Place,” each open with a single word splashed across the screen: “Betrayal,” “Violation,” “Deception,” and “Treachery.” They depict scenarios where a person asks a human stand-in for an AI chatbot for personal advice, only to get blindsided by a product pitch.

Advertisement

Anthropic’s 2026 Super Bowl commercial.

In one spot, a man asks a therapist-style chatbot (a woman sitting in a chair) how to communicate better with his mom. The bot offers a few suggestions, then pivots to promoting a fictional cougar-dating site called Golden Encounters.

In another spot, a skinny man looking for fitness tips instead gets served an ad for height-boosting insoles. Each ad ends with the tagline: “Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude.” Anthropic plans to air a 30-second version during Super Bowl LX, with a 60-second cut running in the pregame, according to CNBC.

Advertisement

In the X posts, the OpenAI executives argue that these commercials are misleading because the planned ChatGPT ads will appear labeled at the bottom of conversational responses in banners and will not alter the chatbot’s answers.

But there’s a slight twist: OpenAI’s own blog post about its ad plans states that the company will “test ads at the bottom of answers in ChatGPT when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation,” meaning the ads will be conversation-specific.

The financial backdrop explains some of the tension over ads in chatbots. As Ars previously reported, OpenAI struck more than $1.4 trillion in infrastructure deals in 2025 and expects to burn roughly $9 billion this year while generating about $13 billion in revenue. Only about 5 percent of ChatGPT’s 800 million weekly users pay for subscriptions. Anthropic is also not yet profitable, but it relies on enterprise contracts and paid subscriptions rather than advertising, and it has not taken on infrastructure commitments at the same scale as OpenAI.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

What AI Integration Really Looks Like in Today’s Classrooms

Published

on

In late 2022, when generative AI tools landed in students’ hands, classrooms changed almost overnight. Essays written by algorithms appeared in inboxes. Lesson plans suddenly felt outdated. And across the country, schools asked the same questions: How do we respond — and what comes next?

Some educators saw AI as a threat that enables cheating and undermines traditional teaching. Others viewed it as a transformative tool. But a growing number are charting a different path entirely: teaching students to work with AI critically and creatively while building essential literacy skills.

The challenge isn’t just about introducing new technology. It’s about reimagining what learning looks like when AI is part of the equation. How do teachers create assignments that can’t be easily outsourced to generative AI tools? How do elementary students learn to question AI-generated content? And how do educators integrate these tools without losing sight of creativity, critical thinking and human connection?

Recently, EdSurge spoke with three educators who are tackling these questions head-on: Liz Voci, an instructional technology specialist at an elementary school; Pam Amendola, a high school English teacher who reimagined her Macbeth unit to include AI; and Brandie Wright, who teaches fifth and sixth graders at a microschool, integrating AI into lessons on sustainability.

EdSurge: What led you to integrate AI into your teaching?

Amendola: When OpenAI’s ChatGPT burst onto the scene in November 2022, it upended education and sent teachers scrambling. Students were suddenly using AI to complete assignments. Many students thought, Why should I complete a worksheet when AI can do it for me? Why write a discussion post when AI can do it better and faster?

Advertisement

Our education system was built for an industrial age, but we now live in a technological age where tasks are completed rapidly. Learning at school should be a time of discovery, but education remains stuck in the past. We are in a place I call the in between. In this place, I discovered a need to educate students on AI literacy alongside the themes and structure of the English language.

I reimagined my Macbeth unit to integrate AI with traditional learning methods. I taught Acts I-III using time-tested approaches, building knowledge of both Shakespeare and AI into each act. In Act IV, students recreated their assigned scenes using generative AI to make an original movie. For Act V, they used block-based programming to have robots act out their scenes. My assessment had nothing to do with writing an essay, so it was uncheatable. I encouraged students to work with me to design the lesson so I could determine the best way to help them learn.

Voci: Last fall, I was in a literacy meeting with administrators and teachers where I heard concerns about the new science of reading materials not engaging students’ interest. While the books were highly accessible, students had no interest in reading them. This was my lightbulb moment. If we could use AI tools to develop engaging and accessible reading passages for students, we could also teach foundational AI literacy skills at the same time.

This is where The Perfect Book Project was born. Students work with teachers to develop their own perfect reading book that is both engaging and accessible, learning literary skills alongside how to work with and evaluate AI-generated content. In its pilot, I worked directly with teachers as students conceptualized, drafted, edited and published their books. I spent hundreds of hours creating prompts with content guardrails, accessibility constraints and research-based foundational literacy knowledge to guide students and teachers through the process.

Wright: I’m doing quite a bit of work around the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals, teaching our explorers the impact of our actions not just on ourselves but also on others and the environment. I wanted to see them use AI to deepen their knowledge and serve as a thought partner as they develop solutions to issues like climate change.

I created a lesson called “Investigating Energy Efficiency and Sustainability in Our Spaces.” The explorers went on a sustainability scavenger hunt around campus to find examples of energy-efficient items and sustainable practices. They used AI tools to analyze their findings, interpret and evaluate AI responses for accuracy and potential bias, and reflect on how technology and human decisions work together to create sustainable solutions. The AI in this lesson wasn’t about the tools they used, but more about how AI is viewed in the context of what they are learning.

Advertisement

What shifts in student learning did you observe?

Voci: One eye-opening moment was during my first lesson on hallucinations and bias with a third grade class. After introducing the concepts at a developmentally appropriate level, I had them reread their manuscripts through the lens of an AI hallucination and bias detective. It didn’t take long for the first student to find the first hallucination. There was incorrect scoring in a football game. AI counted a touchdown as one point. One student’s hand flew up; he was so excited to explain to me and the class how the model had incorrectly scored the game.

This discovery lit a fire under the rest of the class to begin looking more closely at every word of their text and not take it at face value. The class went on to find more hallucinations and discover some generalizations that did not represent their intentions.

Wright: I saw the explorers develop their critical thinking as they asked questions about how AI was used, how AI makes its decisions and whether this affects the environment. I truly appreciate that this age group holds onto their creativity and imagination. They don’t want AI to do the creating for them. They still want to draw their own pictures and tell their own stories.

Amendola: It was uncomfortable for my honors students to try something new. They were out of their element and craved the structure of the rubric. I had to let go of traditional grading structures first before I could help them embrace the ambiguity. Their willingness to explore and make mistakes was wonderful. The collaboration helped create a sense of class community that resulted in learning a new skill.

What’s your advice for educators hesitant to explore AI?

Advertisement

Amendola: Don’t be afraid to try new things. Keep in mind that the greatest success first requires a change of mindset. Only then can you open the doors to what generative AI can do for your students.

Voci: Don’t let the fear, weight and speed of AI advancement paralyze you. Find small, intentional steps that are grounded in human-centered values to move forward with your own knowledge, and then find ways to connect your new knowledge to support student learning. In this age of AI, we need to give our fellow educators the same resources, scaffolding and grace.

Wright: Jump in!


Join the movement at https://generationai.org to participate in our ongoing exploration of how we can harness AI’s potential to create more engaging and transformative learning experiences for all students.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025