Sometimes the sun throws a temper tantrum, and that tantrum hits Earth. For some people, that means a chance to see the beautiful aurora borealis light up the night sky. But solar storms can cause damage to Earth and the various people and items orbiting in space. That’s because, according to a new study, the risks from solar storms might be worse than originally thought. 

The study, authored by NASA’s Nithin Sivadas and Maria Walach of Lancaster University, posits that science’s understanding of solar storms and the electrical currents generated in Earth’s upper atmosphere may have been misunderstood, and that solar storms may be much riskier, especially for satellites and astronauts in orbit. 

To understand the problem, understanding what the science currently says is key. When solar winds hit the upper atmosphere, they create all sorts of interactions, resulting in effects such as the auroras and electrical current. The current scientific consensus is that there’s a maximum amount of electrical current that can exist in the upper atmosphere because of factors such as solar wind energy, atmospheric limits and current saturation. Once that threshold is reached, Earth’s magnetosphere naturally dissipates the excess.

But this new research suggests that the limit doesn’t actually exist and that earlier assumptions about it were based on “uncertainties in solar wind measurements.” Those uncertainties likely arose because most solar wind measurements are taken by spacecraft about a million miles closer to the sun than Earth, at a location known as Lagrange Point 1.

Measurements taken closer to Earth’s surface by NASA spacecraft show a direct correlation between solar wind strength and electrical current in the atmosphere, and suggest that there is no upper limit as previously assumed. That means the atmosphere can produce as much electricity as there is solar wind to generate it. 

How much risk are we talking?

It’s not well understood how much riskier solar storms are versus what science already knew. Solar storms have caused a lot of damage in the past, with instances such as the Carrington Event in 1859 setting telegraph machines on fire or the 12,350 BC solar storm, which researchers said was “orders of magnitude stronger than everything directly observed.” Further study is still needed to understand the potential risks. 

“If there is no upper limit to our planet’s response to the solar wind, modeling for extreme cases needs to take this into account, and we should be vigilant of space weather effects,” Walach said in a statement. “Fortunately, these very extreme cases are rare, but this also means we have limited data to work with and only time will tell what happens at the very extreme one-in-a-thousand-year kind of event.”

Current simulations that use the limits explained above already paint a pretty grim picture for our electronic-heavy modern existence. A solar storm of the magnitude of the Carrington Event would level a significant number of Earth’s satellites and cause untold damage to systems here on Earth as well. And it wouldn’t be the first time: During the Halloween solar storms in 2003, Earth lost contact with 59% of its satellites at the time. While modern technology is better at resisting these risks, it’s not immune. 

But there is some good news. First, such a catastrophic solar storm wouldn’t spell the end for humanity. Walach says that the Earth’s magnetic field “does a really great job of protecting us against many space weather effects,” and that most of the time, all humans will notice is the occasional glitch or a beautiful aurora. She says satellites would fare more poorly in such extreme space weather conditions. 

The other good news is that the sun is nearing the end of its solar maximum for its current 11-year cycle (assuming it hasn’t already ended), so the odds of extreme space weather are much lower than they were in 2024, when Earth was treated to an extreme solar weather event that pushed the aurora borealis down to Texas for an entire week.

Apple is in early talks with PrismML, a startup that shrinks large AI models to run directly on a phone. The company’s on-device AI pitch could help Apple keep more of Siri’s work off the cloud.

PrismML chief executive Babak Hassibi told CNBC that Apple and other companies were evaluating its technology. He called the discussions very early and said it was unclear where they would lead, but that “things are progressing nicely.” Apple did not comment. The Information first reported Apple’s interest last week.

The startup is a Khosla Ventures-backed spinout from the California Institute of Technology. Caltech owns the underlying patents and licenses them exclusively to PrismML. The company raised a $16.25 million seed round in March.

What PrismML built

On Tuesday, PrismML released Bonsai 27B. It is a compressed build of Alibaba’s open-source Qwen model, not a new one trained from scratch. The company shrank it from roughly 54GB to as little as 3.9GB.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

PrismML ships two versions under a free licence. A ternary build runs on a laptop. A smaller 1-bit build, about 3.9GB, is designed to fit within the memory budget of an iPhone 17 Pro. PrismML says it is the first model of that size to run on a phone.

The trick is how the model stores its internal values. PrismML reduces each one from 16 bits to just one or three possible values. It says this cuts memory use by 10 to 15 times, speeds up responses by six to eight times, and lowers energy use by three to six times.

There is a cost. Hassibi said the compressed models lose a few percentage points of performance. Factual recall weakens first, he said, before skills such as reasoning, maths, and coding. PrismML says its builds keep about 95% of full performance in the ternary version and 90% in the 1-bit one.

Why Apple cares

The timing is not an accident. PrismML released the model a day after Apple opened the public beta of iOS 27, which carries its long-delayed Siri overhaul. Apple is trying to make Siri competitive with assistants from OpenAI and Anthropic.

Running more AI on the device would help. Apple already sends complex requests to cloud models. Keeping more work local would cut delay, lower cloud costs, and support the company’s privacy pitch. Some features would also work offline.

There is a cost angle too. Morgan Stanley estimates Apple’s memory costs could climb sharply in its 2027 financial year. The bank expects the company to raise iPhone prices to protect margins. Smaller models help Apple fit capable AI into tight hardware without paying for more memory.

Claims still to be proven

Analysts urged caution. Tarun Pathak of Counterpoint Research said the real test would be millions of queries across thousands of devices. Phil Solis of IDC said power use was the biggest open question, since a model that runs often could still drain a battery.

The release also feeds a debate over whether efficiency gains will cut demand for memory and data-centre chips. Gil Luria, an analyst at D.A. Davidson, said shrinking models would not remove the need for processors. It would simply move some of them from data centres onto phones, part of a broader shift toward edge AI.

Hassibi said Google’s open-source Gemma model is next in the pipeline, followed by larger frontier models. “It’s very important that the intelligence be local and that it can run fast,” he said.

ASML is working to cut the time it takes to build and test its extreme ultraviolet lithography machines by roughly a third, CFO Roger Dassen told reporters on Wednesday. The cycle time, the period between starting production in ASML’s clean rooms and shipping, was about 22 weeks a few quarters ago. “We’re now looking at bringing that down to 15 to 16 weeks,” Dassen said.

The Dutch company is “close to being fully booked” for EUV machines in 2027, with a “substantial number” of orders for 2028. Dassen called it “rare” to have orders that far in advance, a signal of how aggressively chipmakers are building capacity for AI. ASML raised its full-year sales guidance to between €43 billion and €45 billion ($49.2 billion) and plans to increase capacity by 30% for 2027, while “investigating” a further 30% boost for 2028.

The company outlined plans to produce about 65 units of its low-NA EUV machines this year. To hit higher numbers, ASML is reducing testing protocols while maintaining quality, reorganising clean room cabins to dedicate all space to output rather than R&D, and working with its supply chain to remove bottlenecks. “We see opportunities to reduce the testing protocol and still maintain quality,” Dassen said. “We can crank out more tools, and customers are open to that.” AI infrastructure demand is driving long-term supply commitments across every layer of the semiconductor stack, from memory to the machines that make the chips.

EUV machines take more than a year to deliver after an order is placed, and ASML is the only company in the world that makes them. Every advanced chip from TSMC, Samsung, and Intel requires ASML’s tools. The capacity constraints mean that the pace at which AI data centres can be built is ultimately gated by how fast ASML can ship lithography equipment. The AI memory shortage is already driving up consumer electronics prices, and ASML’s production bottleneck sits one step further upstream, at the machines that make the chips that go into everything.

from the deregulatory-dysfunction dept

In late 2024 the Biden FTC under Lina Khan passed new “click to cancel” rules that made it easier to cancel subscriptions and services, promising to punish the worst offenders. It was a direct response to decades of sleazy behavior from companies (from AOL to the Wall Street Journal) that made cancelling services an overly complicated, gargantuan pain in the ass.

But we’re living in the golden age of corruption.

Before they could take effect, the rules were summarily executed by the 8th Circuit court of appeals, stocked with Trump appointees. The court sided with gym companies, marketing firms, and insurance companies who sued to stop the rule, part of a effort under Trumpism to declare U.S. regulators entirely toothless, decorative, and incapable of doing literally anything that upsets corporate power.

But the rules are now living on in New York City, where Lina Khan has advised new Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani’s office last week announced Executive Orders 9 and 10, which not only ban all hidden junk fees, but implement a “click to cancel” rule that guarantees consumers can cancel subscriptions as easily as they sign up for them:

“For years, companies have built their business model around making it harder for working people to hold onto their money,” said Mayor Mamdani. “Whether it’s hidden fees that suddenly appear at checkout or subscriptions that take one click to sign up for and a dozen steps to cancel, the result is the same: working people pay more while corporations profit. That ends now. If you can sign up with one click, you can cancel with one click.”

While promising, enforcement will matter. States and municipalities have a proud history of announcing something like this, then failing badly to engage in enforcement. Often because taking on deep-pocketed companies is costly and time consuming, and an uphill challenge for many states or municipalities with no limit of fires to put out in the Trump era (the whole reason you need a federal government).

You’ve probably seen this sort of thing on the “right to repair” front, where states will announce bold new “right to repair” laws that protect consumers from corporate efforts to monopolize repair, only to result in nobody bothering to enforce them. Or they’ll announce bold to efforts to ban stuff like junk fees, but exempt most of the problematic industries (like Illinois just did).

Still, it’s nice to see somebody care about an issue I’ve written about for the better part of two decades. It’s worth noting that other efforts from the Biden era to protect consumers from sleazy fees — like the FCC’s attempted broadband “nutrition label” — were also quickly demolished by the Trump administration and their corporate friends.

You’re going to be seeing a lot of this sort of thing as the federal government creaks and collapses under the weight of corruption and our extremist courts. The onus of consumer protection (and labor rights, public safety, environmental issues, etc.) is now falling entirely into the laps of municipalities and states, resulting in a patchwork of more localized and inconsistently enforced rules.

Corporations and self-proclaimed anti-regulation “free market” entrepreneurs will then whine incessantly about said patchwork of inconsistent oversight, hoping you’ll ignore that their corruption, lobbying, greed, and regulatory capture disemboweled federal governance and pissed off the voters in the first place, creating the very thing they’re angry about.

For example, a bunch of right wing and libertarian rich brats found it immeasurably insufferable that a woman (Lina Khan) was engaged in things like antitrust reform, banning noncompetes, and outlawing junk fees. So they embraced corrupt fascism. The problems caused by fascism is directly fueling support for democratic socialism, which the rich brats are now whining about incessantly, oblivious that their greedy disdain for even the most modest of federal corporate accountability was the catalyst for it all.

Filed Under: click to cancel, consumers, deregulation, fees, lina khan, nyc, regulatory capture, surcharges, zohran mamdani

DeepSeek is getting ready to go public. The Chinese AI lab has started laying the groundwork for an initial public offering, according to Bloomberg. It could file as soon as this year, with a debut targeted for 2027. First, though, it wants to raise more in private.

The Hangzhou lab closed its first-ever outside round only weeks ago. That raise took in about $7bn and valued it at roughly $50bn. Now it is talking to new backers about a fresh round. The pre-money valuation on the table is at least 480bn yuan, or about $71bn.

Bloomberg says DeepSeek is seeking at least 10bn yuan, around $1.5bn. The final figure could run several times higher, depending on how many investors sign on. The Financial Times first reported the new fundraising. The Information puts the target higher still, at a second round of roughly $7.4bn.

A sevenfold repricing in three months

A $71bn tag would mark a jump of about 40% in six weeks. Zoom out and the climb is steeper. DeepSeek opened to external capital in April at around $10bn. Within days, Tencent and Alibaba entered talks that pushed the figure past $20bn. By May it was nearing $45bn. The round closed near $50bn in June.

That first raise was unusual by design. Only one investor, China’s National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund, received direct equity and voting rights. Every other backer’s money went into a limited partnership that founder Liang Wenfeng controls. They got no vote and a five-year lock-up. The structure would normally empty a room. Instead the round was reportedly oversubscribed.

The IPO timeline

DeepSeek is working with accounting and banking advisers to finish its financial statements by the end of December, one person told Bloomberg. That is a required step before any filing. A listing could come near the end of this year or early in 2027. The timing depends on when the numbers are ready.

No exchange has been confirmed. The market expects mainland China or Hong Kong, where domestic rivals Zhipu and MiniMax have already listed. Zhipu’s shares are up nearly 1,600% since its January debut. That precedent helps explain why DeepSeek is edging toward public markets. The timeline would also put it alongside OpenAI. That firm recently pushed its own IPO to 2027, holding out for a $1tn valuation.

Why investors keep paying up

DeepSeek is not repricing on hype alone. Its annualised revenue recently reached between $400m and $500m, drawn from cloud access to its models, The Information reported. In June, the lab accounted for nearly 23% of the enterprise AI gateway tokens processed by Vercel, per TechCrunch. Only Anthropic, on 32%, ranked higher.

It built that position on open-source reasoning models. They perform within striking distance of frontier US labs, despite export controls that limit China’s access to advanced Nvidia chips. DeepSeek’s cloud service runs on hardware from Huawei instead. It is one of the clearest signs yet that a competitive AI stack can run without American silicon.

The founder who answers to nobody

The valuation has been personally transformative for Liang. His stake, still around 78%, is now worth about $36bn on paper, up from $16.7bn. That figure comes from the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. It makes him the wealthiest AI founder in the world, ahead of Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and OpenAI’s Greg Brockman.

Liang has told prospective investors that DeepSeek will prioritise long-term research over quick commercialisation. It will keep releasing open-source models on the road to artificial general intelligence. That is easier to promise when your backers cannot outvote you. Whether it holds once DeepSeek answers to public shareholders is the real question a DeepSeek IPO would test.

This post is brought to you in paid partnership with QuickBooks

Customers today expect businesses to accept payments however is most convenient, whether that’s tapping a card at a checkout counter, paying an invoice from a phone, or completing a purchase online. For small businesses, meeting those expectations is important, but managing multiple payment systems behind the scenes can quickly become complicated.

The easiest payment setup isn’t necessarily the one with the most options. It’s the one that matches how a business actually sells while keeping invoicing, payment collection, and accounting connected. For many businesses, that means offering a few reliable ways to accept payments instead of trying to support every possible payment method.

Platforms like QuickBooks Payments are built around that idea, allowing businesses to accept payments online and in person through a connected workflow that helps reduce manual work and provides better visibility into incoming revenue.

Why choosing the right payment methods matters

Every business accepts payments differently. A retailer may process hundreds of in-store transactions every day, while a consultant might never meet clients in person. Contractors often collect payments on-site, and online sellers depend entirely on digital checkouts.

Trying to offer every available payment option can create unnecessary complexity. Multiple payment providers often mean separate logins, different fee structures, and additional reconciliation at the end of the month.

A simpler approach is to choose payment methods based on how customers actually buy. Most small businesses only need a handful of reliable options that cover the majority of transactions while keeping the payment process straightforward for both customers and employees.

Make in-person payments simple

For businesses that meet customers face to face, speed and convenience matter. The easier it is to complete a transaction, the better the customer experience and the faster the business receives payment.

A mobile card reader remains one of the most flexible options for accepting payments away from a traditional checkout counter. Whether it’s a contractor collecting payment after completing a job or a vendor selling at a local market, portable card readers allow businesses to accept tap, dip, and swipe payments almost anywhere.

Tap to Pay on supported smartphones adds another layer of flexibility by allowing customers to pay directly using a contactless card or digital wallet without requiring separate card reader hardware. For businesses that frequently work on location, reducing the amount of equipment they need to carry can make everyday transactions even simpler.

Rather than treating these as separate payment systems, QuickBooks Payments connects in-person transactions with the same platform used for invoicing and accounting. Payments are recorded automatically, reducing the need for manual reconciliation later.

Make online payments just as easy

Online payments should be just as simple as in-person transactions. Customers are far more likely to complete a payment when they can do it immediately without navigating multiple websites or creating additional accounts.

One of the easiest approaches is to include a secure payment link directly within an invoice. Customers can open the invoice, choose their preferred payment method, and complete the transaction in just a few steps. That removes unnecessary friction while helping businesses shorten the time between sending an invoice and receiving payment.

Businesses selling through an ecommerce website also benefit from offering a seamless checkout experience. Allowing customers to complete purchases directly from the website reduces abandoned carts and creates a smoother buying journey.

Some businesses also continue to accept payments over the phone for repeat customers or custom orders. A virtual terminal makes it possible to process those payments securely without requiring the customer to be physically present.

With QuickBooks Payments, each of these payment methods feeds into the same connected workflow, making it easier to manage both online and in-person sales from a single platform.

Keep every payment connected

Accepting payments is only one part of the process. Businesses also need to track invoices, monitor deposits, update accounting records, and understand how each payment affects cash flow.

When those tasks happen across multiple systems, every transaction creates additional work. Owners spend time exporting reports, reconciling accounts, and checking whether financial records match instead of focusing on customers or growing the business.

An integrated payment workflow simplifies that experience. Estimates become invoices, invoices become payments, and payment information flows directly into accounting records without requiring duplicate data entry.

That’s where QuickBooks Payments provides an advantage. Rather than managing separate solutions for card payments, online invoices, and bookkeeping, businesses can handle the entire payment journey within one connected ecosystem. The result is greater visibility into cash flow, fewer administrative tasks, and more time spent running the business.

Simplicity often beats more payment options

The easiest way to accept payments isn’t the one with the longest list of supported payment methods. It’s the one that reflects how customers actually prefer to pay while keeping business operations simple behind the scenes.

For many small businesses, that means combining one or two reliable in-person payment options with a few flexible online payment methods instead of juggling multiple disconnected systems. A connected workflow helps reduce administrative work, improves visibility into incoming revenue, and creates a smoother experience for both customers and business owners.

As customer expectations continue to evolve, accepting payments wherever business happens has become increasingly important. Equally important is making sure every payment fits into a workflow that’s easy to manage, easy to track, and built to support long-term growth.

Frequently asked questions

Can QuickBooks Payments accept both online and in-person payments?

Yes. QuickBooks Payments is designed to support both. Businesses can accept in-person payments using a mobile card reader or Tap to Pay on supported devices, while also accepting online payments through invoice payment links, ecommerce checkouts, or a virtual terminal for phone orders. Because every payment flows through the same QuickBooks ecosystem, businesses don’t need separate platforms to manage different sales channels.

Does QuickBooks Payments work with QuickBooks accounting?

One of the biggest advantages of QuickBooks Payments is that it integrates directly with QuickBooks. Payments, deposits, and invoice statuses update automatically as customers pay, reducing manual data entry and making it easier to keep accounting records current without reconciling information across multiple systems.

What payment methods can customers use with QuickBooks Payments?

QuickBooks Payments supports a variety of payment methods, including credit cards, debit cards, ACH bank payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, and Venmo. Offering multiple payment options makes it easier for customers to pay using the method they already prefer, helping businesses reduce payment friction and get paid sooner.

Do I need separate payment providers for my website and in-person sales?

Not necessarily. Many businesses begin with different providers as they grow, but managing multiple systems often means separate reporting, duplicate reconciliation, and additional administrative work. QuickBooks Payments allows businesses to accept online and in-person payments through one connected platform, giving owners a single view of sales, payments, and cash flow.

Is QuickBooks Payments a good fit for service businesses as well as retailers?

That is indeed the case. The platform is designed to support a wide range of business types. Retailers can use in-person payment options such as mobile card readers or Tap to Pay, while contractors, consultants, and other service businesses can send digital invoices with built-in payment links, process payments on-site, or accept phone payments through a virtual terminal. Because every transaction feeds into QuickBooks, businesses have a consistent workflow regardless of how customers choose to pay.

This content is paid for by the brands indicated. Digital Trends works closely with advertisers to highlight their products and services to our readers. Although this article is informational and not opinionated, it reflects thorough fact-checking by our team to ensure accuracy. Our dedicated partnerships team, not external advertisers, crafts all branded content in-house. For more information on our approach to branded content, click here.

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed below belong solely to the author. Data sourced from Singapore Ministry of Manpower and Randstad.

In the age of the Internet, most of us are used to looking for a job online, googling for offers on one of the numerous employment boards or LinkedIn. Data in Randstad’s recently published Employer Brand Research 2026 appears to confirm that this is the case.

Because of that, it might seem easy to forget that there are many direct ways to search for a new job. However, according to the data released by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower in Jun, they have been growing in popularity in recent years.

More Singaporeans are looking for help

In the past decade, the number of jobseekers looking for assistance at local career centres has very nearly tripled, from just over 25,000 in 2016 to over 73,000 in 2025.

Career centres are more than just a public recruitment agency.

They provide direct, individual, human assistance and coaching. They interview candidates, help prepare their resumes, advise them on potential upskilling and provide job matching services, connecting them to the right employers.

In the past, they may have been seen as a sort of “last resort” for desperate jobseekers (typically of lower educational attainment), who couldn’t land a job by applying directly. Today, they seem to have gone mainstream, attracting younger and more educated jobseekers as well.

Degree-holders have increased their share among candidates using CC services, from barely over one-fifth 10 years ago to nearly 40% last year, becoming the single largest educational group using this avenue of public job assistance.

More broadly, back in 2016, the split between secondary and lower-educated candidates and those with post-secondary education (including diplomas and degrees) was roughly 50:50.

Today, the share of those with tertiary education has risen to over 70%.

Sign of a crisis or a sign of the times?

Sceptics may see this as a sign of a growing labour market crisis, where jobs are so difficult to secure that even the highly educated Singaporeans are forced to seek specialist help instead of simply applying and attending interviews.

That might seem so, but there are two pieces of data which suggest otherwise.

Firstly, the resident and citizen unemployment rates remain low, at around or slightly below 3%.

Secondly, the success rates for job placements through career centres have been going up, even as the number of candidates has grown significantly over the past 10 years.

Overall, two out of three candidates have managed to find a job through a CC last year, including 58% of degree-holders—in both cases, these are the highest numbers on record.

Educated candidates typically find it a bit harder than those looking for simpler jobs, since their specialisation is narrower and expectations regarding pay and working conditions are higher. Nevertheless, more than half of them were successfully helped in career centres, even as demand is surging.

As it turns out, even in the digital era, some good, old-fashioned career advice, coaching and human help still work very well.

• Read other articles we’ve written on Singapore’s job landscape here.

Featured Image Credit: Careers Connect (Lifelong Learning Institute)/ Google Street View