Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

Google Pixel 10a scores big for repairability in teardown

Published

on

After achieving an 8.5 out of 10 repairability score, the Pixel 10a is one of the most serviceable mid-range smartphones currently on the market.

Following a teardown of the handset, PBKreviews awarded the Pixel 10a maximum marks in three of five repairability categories: finding replacement parts, replacing the screen, and replacing the battery.

This strong repairability result is a big win for the Pixel 10a, especially when considering its £/$499 RRP, as many rivals in the same price range score significantly lower. With this in mind, consumers could be more likely to opt for a Pixel 10a and seek out repair options, rather than buying replacements.

A rubberised mesh gasket protects the speaker from water ingress, a design detail that contributes to the phone’s IP68 water resistance credentials while keeping the internal layout accessible enough to avoid significantly complicating disassembly during repair procedures.

Advertisement

The teardown process also requires a hair dryer or heat gun to loosen the adhesive securing the back plate which although is a common approach among mid-range smartphones, this does add a step that less experienced users may find challenging without the right tools.

Advertisement

Pixel 10a with USB C plugged inPixel 10a with USB C plugged in

However, the Pixel 10a does lose ground in one area, with the USB port soldered directly onto the mainboard proving the trickiest fix in the entire teardown. This is an issue because soldered ports typically require mainboard-level replacement rather than a straightforward component swap, a limitation that offsets some of the accessibility gains elsewhere in the internal layout.

The internal organisation and time required for repairs sit in a middle ground, with the overall layout considered enough to avoid major disassembly headaches but not streamlined enough to match the simplicity of the battery and screen replacement processes.

The Pixel 10a officially launched in March, with an RRP of £/$499 for the 128GB model and £/$599 for the 256GB variant, both with 8GB of RAM.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

NIO ES9 Delivers Flagship Size and Refinement in China’s Electric SUV Market

Published

on

NIO ES9 Electric SUV Launch
Display vehicles for NIO’s new ES9 electric SUV have arrived in showrooms around China, ahead of tomorrow’s tech showcase. The ES9 measures 211 inches long and has a wheelbase of 128 inches, making it somewhat larger than the ES8, and currently the largest pure electric SUV available in the country.



The ES9’s front end takes a bit of a sharp-headed shark approach, swinging into some split headlights that can project some beautiful patterns in the form of welcome lights. Wide angle LiDAR devices are tucked away in the fenders, along with some extra lighting components, as well as a roof-mounted unit that works with cameras and radar to provide data into NIO’s next-generation support system. The wheels, which range from 21 to 23 inches depending on the trim, help to create a silhouette that appears to be supposed to be there – planted and premium from almost every aspect.

Sale


Segway Ninebot S2 Electric Self-Balancing Scooter – Master Your Commute w/t 11.2 mph Max. Speed, 21.7 Mi…
  • Speed & Range: Experience exhilarating rides with the Ninebot S2’s impressive top speed of 11.2 mph and range of 21.7 miles.
  • Beginner-Friendly: Perfect for riders aged 16-50, the Segway S2 features a user-friendly learning mode, providing a smooth and gradual introduction.
  • Adjustable & Supportive: Enjoy a customized fit tailored to your needs, as the Segway S2 accommodates heights ranging from 4’3″ to 6’6″ and supports…

Power is sent to all four wheels via a dual motor system. The front unit produces 241 horsepower, while the rear motor produces 456 horsepower, totaling 697 horsepower and 700 Newton meters of torque. Engineers designed the entire system around a 900volt architecture to get the energy out rapidly and sustain rather fast charging speeds, much exceeding what most people are used to on a regular basis.

Advertisement

NIO ES9 Electric SUV Launch
The ES9 gets a a 102 kilowatt-hour battery from CATL, which uses the ternary lithium chemistry that NIO prefers. The Chinese cycle has a range of up to 385 miles with the most efficient arrangement, while other models do not perform as well. However, one feature shared by all variations is the incorporation of NIO’s battery swapping network, which allows you to replace the pack in minutes rather than waiting for a full charge.

NIO ES9 Electric SUV Launch Interior
Inside, the ES9’s cabin is divided into two 2+2+2 configurations, with capacity and comfort for six adults as primary priorities. Nappa leather covers every surface, and real wood trim and embroidered details give it a warm, cozy feel. A wraparound dashboard design then houses the true star of the show, a crisp 15.6-inch AMOLED floating screen that runs NIO’s SkyOS interface and sits beside the NOMI Mate 3.0 voice assistant sitting on top. Second row passengers perform particularly well and benefit from the ES9’s 128-inch wheelbase, with higher trims receiving zero gravity seats that recline rather deeply and have all of the frills such as heating, ventilation, massage, and memory features. Then there’s electrochromic glass, which allows you to turn a switch and the rear windows go from clear to tinted in seconds. Add two 14.5-inch entertainment displays and a dedicated 8-inch control screen, and you have a car that will keep passengers happy in the back seat. There’s also a built-in fridge to keep your drinks cool without the need to stop anywhere, as well as a split panoramic roof that lets in plenty of natural light.

NIO ES9 Electric SUV Launch Interior
Technology does not stop with the touchscreens and seats. How it all works together, in this example the steer by wire technology and the SkyRide chassis, has a significant impact on your driving experience, providing precise handling and a comfortable ride even in a large vehicle like this one. The Shenji NX9031 chip powers it all, combining data from several lidar sensors and 4D radar to make driving feel rock solid regardless of the weather. And if you’ve seen the films of the car being flung around on snow-covered trails and then surviving a high-speed blowout at -30 degrees Celsius with barely a glitch, you know what I’m talking about.

NIO ES9 Electric SUV Launch
On April 9th, we’ll find out what price the ES9 starts at, which is rumored to be around 500,000 yuan ($73,200). That puts it just below the price of NIO’s top-of-the-line ET9 sedan, but with a lot more room to spread out in and plenty of comforts thrown in, and you’ll be able to get your hands on one just a few months later, in late May. If you are lucky enough to be one of the first in line, you will receive your new ES9 Horizon Edition around a week later.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

HyperX Pulsefire Saga Review: This Gaming Mouse Changes Shape

Published

on

If you’re someone who spends hours gaming, you already know how important a good mouse is. The problem? Most gaming mice look different on paper but feel almost identical in hand. With so many options out there, it’s getting harder to find something that actually stands out. The HyperX Pulsefire Saga tries to flip that idea on its head with a modular design. Instead of adjusting your grip to the mouse, you can tweak the mouse itself to match your comfort. It also promises strong performance, with features such as a 26K DPI sensor and an 8K polling rate. But beyond the specs, I wanted to see if the modular design makes it better to use in real gameplay.

HyperX Pulsefire Saga

Deepti Pathak

Summary

Advertisement

After using the HyperX Pulsefire Saga for a while, it’s clear that it’s more than just a gaming mouse. From a functionality standpoint, I can say it’s held up incredibly well. The sensor is fast and reliable, and the lightweight design is a big plus for long-term use.

Design and Build

Design_and_Build_of_HyperX_Pulsefire_saga_mouse

The first thing I noticed when I started using the HyperX Pulsefire Saga was how light it felt in my hand. At just 69 grams, it felt easy to control without feeling too fragile. While gaming, this made tracking and quick reactions feel smoother. What really makes this mouse different is its modular build. I was able to change the top shell, button covers, and side buttons within seconds. The magnetic system works well, and everything clicks into place securely. Even after changing configurations multiple times, the build stayed consistent.

In terms of comfort, I used it for long sessions, sometimes up to a few hours at a stretch. The weight, or lack thereof, helps a lot with comfort, and I didn’t experience the strain that I normally get with a heavier mouse. There are a couple of things that didn’t quite work for me, though. The side buttons don’t really feel as high-quality as the rest of the mouse, and there’s a little wobble if you look up close. The scroll wheel is also a bit smaller, but these are just nitpicks.

Advertisement

Overall, the module design is more about function than style, especially if you like to have control over mouse comfort.

Performance

performance of mouse

In terms of performance, this mouse does not disappoint. The 26K DPI sensor shines for tracking, and the ability to reach an 8K polling rate is a clear indicator that this mouse is intended for precision use. I tested it with games like Valorant and GTA V, and the performance was pretty stellar. The movements felt smooth, and I did not feel jitters or unusual behavior.

Whether I was making small aim corrections or fast flicks, it reacted instantly. This made it easier to stay consistent during matches. The clicks have a fast and responsive feel, particularly when you’re firing weapons in FPS games.

With a wired mouse, I found that the cable didn’t interfere with my gaming experience because it was flexible enough to allow natural movement. Overall, performance is accurate, fast, and reliable, which is particularly important for a competitive gamer.

Software and Battery

Since this is a wired mouse, battery life isn’t something you need to worry about. I could just plug it in and start playing without worrying about charging or interruptions, which I found really convenient.

For software, HyperX provides NGENUITY. I used it to customize DPI settings, adjust the polling rate, and play around with RGB lighting. The controls are easy to understand, so setting things up didn’t take much effort. There are also options to remap buttons and fine-tune performance settings. It gives enough control for most users without feeling overwhelming.

Advertisement

That said, once I finished setting things up, I didn’t really need to open the software again. It works well, but it’s more of a one-time setup tool rather than something you’ll use regularly.

Verdict

After using the HyperX Pulsefire Saga for a while, it’s clear that it’s more than just a gaming mouse. You can currently buy this mouse from Amazon for Rs. 3,990. I played around with a few settings before finding one that felt comfortable to use, and once I got into the swing of things, it was much more comfortable. From a functionality standpoint, I can say it’s held up incredibly well. The sensor is fast and reliable, and the lightweight design is a big plus for long-term use.

One or two things could be improved, particularly the side buttons and the wheel, but they didn’t really affect my overall experience. If you’re like me and want a slightly more personalized, comfortable experience, this mouse makes a lot of sense.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

You’ll have one more chance to buy Samsung’s pricey Galaxy Z TriFold this Friday

Published

on

If you missed your chance to pay Samsung $2,900 for a phone earlier this year, we have great news for you. Android Police reported that what may be the final shipment of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold will be arriving in the US on April 10. The unique foldable was discontinued a mere three months after it first went on sale, and it seems like Samsung is clearing out whatever inventory it has left. So if you have a spare $3,000 that you’re just desperate to get rid of, bookmark the TriFold’s page where Samsung has a countdown ticking away.

All jokes aside, our hands-on time with the TriFold at CES 2026 revealed a pretty snazzy device that managed to strike a decent balance between size and heft. But perhaps unsurprisingly for a phone with such an intricate design and high price tag, the company didn’t appear to have any intention to make the TriFold widely available. Samsung may have sold out each batch of the smartphone that went to retail, but the device didn’t offer much in the way of profit, according to reports in South Korean newspaper Dong-A Ilbo.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

‘We’ve always been about democratizing technology’: NetSuite CEO tells us why even your most crucial business data can benefit from the AI revolution

Published

on

As AI becomes an integral part of workflows across businesses in all industries, ensuring the technology offers genuine gains in efficiency and productivity has become a significant consideration for firms of all sizes.

This is particularly true in financial services, where critical data is analysed and stored most carefully, and the idea of handing such valuable information to an AI could be a cause for concern.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why the Social Media Addiction Case Isn’t Over Yet

Published

on

Algorithms. Beauty filters. Endless scrolling.

The case over “social media addiction” against Meta and Google in a California courtroom ultimately came down to these elements, legal experts say, and what a jury found was negligence on social media companies’ part when designing apps where tweens and teens would come to spend roughly one-fifth of their day.

Joseph McNally, former federal prosecutor and director of Emerging Torts and Litigation at McNicholas & McNicholas in California, says jurors agreed with the novel legal argument that Meta and Google were negligent in their design of Instagram and YouTube, respectively, contributing to the mental health problems of the plaintiff. Parent companies of Snapchat and TikTok settled with the plaintiffs before the trial.

McNally and other experts tell EdSurge the verdict will affect thousands of similar cases and influence how tech companies roll out their features — and that the legal tussle over where liability falls when it comes to youth mental health isn’t over yet. With the social media giants vowing to appeal, the case could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Email Evidence

The impact left by the presentation of internal company emails was undeniable, McNally says. Internal Meta communications showed that employees raised alarms about the potential harm to teen girls posed by a beauty filter. Documents also showed they knew that users much younger than 13 — the minimum age required for sign up — were on their platforms, he adds.

“They looked the other way because — the plaintiffs argued — they had a long-term benefit, long-term value of hooking those users early,” McNally says. “I think that the emails painted a picture of a company whose own employees were raising concerns about features in the product, and the plaintiff effectively used those emails to show that they knew about the risk of the product.”

“Addictive” Design

If Meta and Google had settled, the court wouldn’t have had cause to grapple with the legal question of whether social media companies can be held liable for harm caused by their design. But from the defense’s perspective, tech companies had been solidly protected by Section 230 in the past, explains Princess Uchekwe, corporate attorney and founder of The Chief Counsel in New York. That’s the part of the 1996 Communications Decency Act that shields websites and online platforms from being sued over content posted by users.

Just one day before the California verdict, a New Mexico jury found Meta liable in a $375 million consumer protection lawsuit over its failure to protect children from social media harm on its platforms.

Advertisement

“What the lawyers for the plaintiffs were arguing is, essentially, it’s not the content that we have a problem with,” Uchekwe says, “It’s the fact that when people use your platform, you have implemented certain features that make it almost impossible for people to leave. You can scroll into the bottomless pit of hell on Instagram, and nothing ever tells you, ‘Maybe you should pause.’”

The Appeal of an Appeal

The $6 million in damages is a drop in the bucket for the two social media giants, but McNally says there are potential benefits to appealing the ruling anyway. There are thousands more consumer lawsuits against social media companies around the country, with school districts joining as plaintiffs.

One is that an appellate court might find that the long-time protections that social media companies have relied on should have come into play. The verdict barreled through the defenses raised by Section 230, which protects platforms from claims of harm caused by third-party content. It’s a policy that makes a free and open internet possible.

“[Section] 230 has resulted in the dismissal of hundreds of lawsuits over the years where they would’ve otherwise faced hundreds of millions of dollars in liability,” McNally says. “An appeal [based on] Section 230, which is a federal statute, could make its way up to the Supreme Court, who would have the final word on the scope. [If the] court of appeals remanded it back to the trial court and said, ‘Look, Section 230 applies,’ it would essentially bar these claims [of harm caused by the design].”

Advertisement

Uchekwe says failure to win an appeal could be “almost devastating” for tech companies due to the sheer amount of damages they could have to pay across thousands of similar lawsuits, along with the cost of restructuring how their apps function. That could mean rethinking features like targeted algorithms, the ability to endlessly scroll and notifications that draw users back into the app.

“Not only social media companies,” Uchekwe says, “all tech companies that have implemented things like that, especially if they have children as a base, are going to have to start reconsidering.”

First Amendment Question

There’s also a First Amendment case to be made, McNally adds. Some legal experts, including UC Berkeley law professor Erwin Chemerinsky, argue that the “addictive” algorithms that came under fire during the trial are protected free speech. If that argument succeeds on appeal, it could stop the legal cases arguing product liability in their tracks.

“If the Supreme Court overturned it based on Section 230 and the First Amendment, it’s unlikely there’s going to be a new trial. It would likely be dismissed,” McNally says. “I won’t say that with certainty, but the prospects of dismissal would be pretty good for the defendants.”

Advertisement

Ripple Effect

McNally says the fact that a jury ruled Meta and Google’s app features were “unreasonably unsafe for its users” creates challenges for them in the swaths of similar lawsuits they’re facing. Plaintiffs in those cases still must prove a direct link between the social media companies and the harm they’re alleging.

“I think it’s going to result in some cases probably moving closer to settlement, but in all those cases, I think that the defendants are going to be looking closely at the causation issue,” McNally says. “There’s probably other cases out there where the evidence of causation is not as strong, and those cases may be harder for a plaintiff to get across the finish line.”

Uchekwe predicts that if the verdict sticks, tech companies — especially those with users who are under 18 — will be forced to retool their app features to encourage users to spend less time on their platforms. That could hurt the companies’ ad revenue and their ability to gather data on users.

“Undoing some of those things may decrease their bottom line, but I’m not sure it will do it to the extent that it’s detrimental to their revenue,” Uchekwe says. “If you weigh the benefits of putting these safeguards in for children versus your revenue, I never think that your profit should come at the expense of a generation of people.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

WireGuard VPN developer can’t ship software updates after Microsoft locks account

Published

on

WireGuard, the major software project and VPN that underpins popular security software including Mullvad and others, has found itself locked out of a key part of its Microsoft developer’s account and unable to ship software updates to Windows users.

Jason Donenfeld, the creator of the open source WireGuard VPN software, told TechCrunch that he has been locked out of his Microsoft developer account, and as a result cannot sign drivers or ship updates for WireGuard for Windows users, which are critical for its software to run. Donenfeld said in a post on X on Wednesday that the account termination stopped a WireGuard update from shipping.

It’s the second such incident of a high-profile and widely used open source project being shut out from its customers due to a seemingly abrupt account termination from Microsoft, with popular encryption software VeraCrypt facing a similar circumstance. Both developers said Microsoft locked them out of their accounts without first alerting them. 

In the case of VeraCrypt, which is used by hundreds of thousands of users to encrypt files and operating systems, its developer Mounir Idrassi told TechCrunch that being locked out of his account means he is unable to update the software in time for a crucial certificate authority expiry, which he said may prevent some users from booting up.

Advertisement

Donenfeld, the WireGuard developer, told TechCrunch in an email: “If there were a critical vulnerability to fix right now — there isn’t! I just mean hypothetically — then users would be totally exposed.”

WireGuard is an open source VPN software used around the world to connect devices over the internet. WireGuard’s code is highly popular for its simplicity and security, as it serves as the foundation of many VPN implementations and commercial services that rely on its code, like Proton and Tailscale.

Donenfeld told TechCrunch in an email that he has spent the past few weeks modernizing WireGuard’s Windows code and was ready to send a copy update to Microsoft for checks before it can ship out to users, but was met with an “access restricted” error when logging into the developer portion of his Microsoft account.

Despite going through the process to verify his driver’s license or passport with Microsoft (the third party Microsoft uses for verification said he was “verified”), Donenfeld said his access was still suspended.

Advertisement

Donenfeld told TechCrunch that he found a page on Microsoft’s website saying that the company had been carrying out “mandatory account verification for all partners in the Windows Hardware Program who have not completed account verification since April 2024,” but that the verification program had since closed.

Microsoft’s Windows Hardware Program allows developers like Donenfeld and VeraCrypt’s Idrassi to “deploy hardware and device drivers for Windows PCs and other devices.” The ability to develop and release drivers for Windows users is restricted to known and vetted developers, as drivers can grant vast access to an operating system and its data and are known to be abused by hackers for that reason.

That account verification process meant that developers were required to upload their government-issued ID before they were allowed to publish potentially highly sensitive code to the broader Windows user base.

“Microsoft never sent me any notification at all about this. I’ve looked in every inbox in every spam folder in every mail log, and zero, nothing, zilch,” Donenfeld said.

Advertisement

The Windows Hardware Program’s verification program has “now concluded” and developers who have not uploaded their documents had their accounts “suspended,” the page reads, meaning that these accounts can no longer send updates.

Donenfeld said that he was referred to Microsoft’s executive support team, which handles customer service and account requests for high-profile individuals, which confirmed his appeal had been received but that they had to wait as long as 60 days for review.

By late Wednesday, there was a glimmer of hope in Donenfeld’s case. He told TechCrunch that he was finally in contact with Microsoft and that hopefully the issue would be resolved soon.

Microsoft did not immediately comment when reached by TechCrunch.

Advertisement

Donenfeld and Idrassi are not alone, with the account lockout issues affecting others as well.

Windscribe, a maker of VPN and other consumer privacy tools, said in a post on X that it had also been locked out of its Partner Center account. The company said it had a verified account for over eight years in order to sign its drivers.

“We’ve been trying to resolve this for over a month, and getting nowhere. Support is non-existent,” Windscribe said in its post. “Anyone know a human with a brain that still works at Microsoft and can help?”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

New macOS stealer campaign uses Script Editor in ClickFix attack

Published

on

New macOS stealer campaign uses Script Editor in ClickFix attack

A new campaign delivering the Atomic Stealer malware to macOS users abuses the Script Editor in a variation of the ClickFix attack that tricked users into executing commands in Terminal.

Script Editor is a built-in macOS application for writing and running scripts, primarily AppleScript and JXA, that can execute local scripts and shell commands. It is a trusted application pre-installed on macOS systems.

While this is not the first time it has been abused for malware delivery, the researchers note that, in the context of the ClickFix social engineering technique, it does not require the victim to manually interact with the Terminal and execute commands.

Wiz

Apart from the Terminal-based variant being widely reported, macOS Tahoe 26.4 added protection against ClickFix attacks in the form of a warning when trying to execute commands.

In a new campaign distributing Atomic Stealer observed by security researchers at Jamf, the hackers target victims with fake Apple-themed sites that pose as guides to help reclaim disk space on their Mac computers.

Advertisement

These pages contain legitimate-looking system cleanup instructions but use the applescript:// URL scheme to launch Script Editor with a pre-filled executable code.

Prompt to open Script Editor by the malicious web page
Prompt to open the Script Editor by the malicious web page
Source: Jamf

The malicious code runs an obfuscated ‘curl | zsh’ command, which downloads and executes a script directly in system memory.

This decodes a base64 + gzip payload, downloads a binary (/tmp/helper), removes security attributes via ‘xattr -c,’ makes it executable, and runs it.

The final payload is a Mach-O binary identified as Atomic Stealer (AMOS), a commodity malware-as-a-service that has been extensively deployed in ClickFix campaigns using various lures over the past year.

The malware targets a broad spectrum of sensitive data, including information stored in the Keychain, desktop, and browser cryptocurrency wallet extensions, browser autofill data, passwords, cookies, stored credit cards, and system information.

Advertisement

Last year, AMOS also added a backdoor component to give operators persistent access to compromised systems.

Mac users should treat Script Editor prompts as high-risk and avoid running them on their devices unless they fully understand what they do and trust the resource.

For macOS troubleshooting guides, it is recommended to rely only on official documentation from Apple.

Apple Support Communities, the forum where Apple customers can help each other with advice, although it may not be risk-free.

Advertisement

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

2001: An Air Quality Odyssey

Published

on

2001: A Space Odyssey not only pushed the boundaries of filmmaking, but introduced us to one of the most enduring villains in all of media. The HAL 9000 artificial intelligence was human-like but inhuman, a singular uncanny red light on a wall, tasked not only with control of a spaceship and its inner workings but also with being a companion for its occupants. It’s gone on to be the inspiration and basis of many projects around here, where it is generally given much less scope than control of a space ship and instead is tasked with something like monitoring air quality in a home.

Called the PAL 8000 by its creator [Arnov], this uses a Raspberry Pi Pico 2 at its core which monitors a volatile organic compound (VOC) sensor to take air quality measurements. The device features a custom 3D printed enclosure with glowing LEDs and plays contextual audio responses based on air quality levels, completing the HAL 9000 theme. The project also includes a local web dashboard which reports on its data, allowing users to see information in real time rather than relying on HAL’s voice reports alone.

For those looking to build other HAL-inspired projects, [Arnov] has made many of the printing files available on the project’s site. It’s a well-polished build faithful to the source material and could be a great addition to any home automation system for many other tasks beyond air quality monitoring. Perhaps something like a more general-purpose voice assistant, minus the megalomania.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) Review

Published

on

Verdict

The Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) is a beefy and super light Windows laptop that impresses with its potent internals from a new chip, immense endurance and a stylish look. The needle has moved a lot in price against the old model, though, and a 1920×1200 screen for the price feels a little off.

  • Lightweight and super portable

  • Increased grunt from Snapdragon X2 Elite chip

  • Immense battery life

  • More expensive than its predecessor

  • 1920×1200 resolution feels off for the price

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews IconTrusted Reviews Icon

    Advertisement

    Review Price:
    £1599

  • Snapdragon X2 Elite inside:

    Advertisement

    The new Zenbook A14 (2026) packs a lot of power into a small chassis with its use of Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon X2 Elite processor.

  • Sub-1kg chassis:

    Advertisement

    This grunt is packed into a slender and light chassis that keeps this as one of the lightest 14-inch laptops you’ll find today.

  • 70Whr battery:

    Advertisement

    Asus is also touting upwards of 32 hours of battery life from the capacious cell inside the Zenbook A14 (2026).

Introduction

The Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) beefs up this lightweight marvel with one of Qualcomm’s shiny new processors.

Similar to the Zenbook A16 (2026), Asus has packed in a beefy 18-core Snapdragon X2 Elite chip with this laptop alongside 32GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD. Other core specs remain similar to the original Asus Zenbook A14 that I really enjoyed using, including its sub-1kg chassis, solid 1920×1200 OLED screen and a capacious 70Whr battery.

Advertisement

The problem this laptop has against its predecessor, though, is price, clocking in at £1599, making it some £500 more expensive at retail than the last model. This changes its key rivals somewhat, pushing it more towards pro-grade choices such as the Apple MacBook Pro M4 and the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI.

Advertisement

I’ve been putting the Zenbook A14 (2026) through its paces for the last couple of weeks to see if it’s one of the best laptops we’ve tested.

Design and Keyboard

  • Incredibly lightweight and sturdy
  • Excellent port selection
  • Satisfying keyboard and large trackpad

The fit and finish of the Zenbook A14 (2026) hasn’t changed too much against its predecessor, with a similar sand dune-inspired colourway for my sample that’s different to other laptops you’ll find out there. It is also available in a grey colour if you’d prefer something a bit more conventional.

Asus has also kept the weight down with this new iteration, with it tipping the scales at 990g, a marginal increase over the previous model, for a large boost in performance from the new Snapdragon X2 Elite chip inside. It’s super light for a 14-inch laptop and makes it effortlessly portable – you barely notice it in your bag thanks to how light the chassis is and how thin it is. 

Advertisement
Profile - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Profile - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

The reason for this being so lightweight is because of Asus’ use of their own innovative ceraluminium material. This has been carried over from the previous generation, plus has been featured on Asus’ other recent laptops, including the Zenbook S 14 (2026).

As the odd name suggests, ceraluminium is an alloy that blends ceramic and aluminium for a rugged, yet lightweight finish. The former material is quite uncommon in laptops and tech generally, and is one I’ve seen more in the world of watches in bezels, cases and bracelets for fantastic durability and lightness.

Left Ports - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Left Ports - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The Zenbook A14 is also just 13.3mm thick, and comes with a better port selection than modern MacBook Airs. Whereas a new MacBook Air will come with a pair of USB-C ports, headphone jack and Magsafe charging, this Asus laptop features a full-size HDMI, headphone jack and a pair of USB4-capable Type-C ports on the left side, and a USB-A on the right. That’s more Pro than Air.

Being a more compact laptop, the fact that there’s a smaller keyboard layout here isn’t a surprise. It’s a 65 percent option complete with arrow keys, function row and surprisingly deep travel. The 1.3mm of total travel means keypresses have a certain substance to them, and provides a satisfying typing feel. I also found the white backlighting is vibrant and crisp, with a strong white shine that is excellent for after-dark working.

Keyboard & Trackpad - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Keyboard & Trackpad - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

For its size and form factor, I’m also impressed with the size of the Zenbook A14 (2026)’s trackpad. It’s large for such a small and light laptop, with slick and smooth inputs and a good amount of real estate for gestures to boot.

Advertisement

The packaging here seems to be entirely plastic-free, with the laptop coming in a cardboard box and paper bag, along with the cable and power brick.

Display and Sound

  • Deep blacks and fantastic contrast
  • Resolution and refresh rate seem a little low
  • Middling speakers

The needle also hasn’t moved on the display front too much from the old model, as the Zenbook A14 (2026) features a 14-inch 1920×1200 resolution OLED panel, albeit with only a 60Hz refresh rate.

This is just okay in terms of overall detail and responsiveness against a range of rivals – while new MacBooks don’t come with an OLED screen, they do pack in a higher resolution for more detail. Likewise, the Zenbook S 14 (2026) has more detail and a zippier 120Hz refresh rate.

Nonetheless, this panel impresses on immediate use with its excellent colours, while this is also backed up when taking out my colorimeter. I saw perfect 100% coverage of both the sRGB and DCI-P3 spaces, plus an excellent 95% coverage of the trickier Adobe RGB (94%) gamut. This makes this screen suitable for productivity and more colour-sensitive workloads alike.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Screen - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Screen - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

In addition, it offers virtually perfect blacks and fantastic colour temperature with levels of 0.01 and 6600K, respectively, measured both out of the box and with brightness cranked all the way up. Peak SDR brightness here beats our 300-nit target, with a measured 379.4 nits. That isn’t the brightest we’ve tested, but it is suitable for indoor and outdoor use, although is weirdly lower than last year’s model.

In addition, a measured contrast ratio of 29500:1 is impressive and lends the Zenbook A14 to having some excellent dynamic range. There is support for HDR with HDR True Black 600, and here Asus quotes a peak brightness of 600 nits for even more punch.

Screen - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Screen - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The speakers here are reasonable, if unremarkable. They’re downwards-firing, so you’ll want to ensure the Zenbook A14 (2026) is placed on a harder surface, such as a desk, to avoid sounding muffled. There’s a decent mid-range, although they lack top-end precision and extension in the low end. You can use them for basic tasks, although I’d suggest utilising the headphone jack for any serious content consumption.

Performance

  • Beefier Snapdragon X2 Elite processor
  • Improved integrated graphics
  • Capacious RAM and SSD arrangement

Advertisement

Where Asus has overhauled the Zenbook A14 (2026) is internally, rather than changing the outside too much. The original model from last year was supplied with Qualcomm’s base Snapdragon X chip, with eight cores and more pared-back performance against other x86-based ultrabooks in its more premium price range.

For 2026, this laptop is supplied with Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon X2 Elite processor, the second-in-command to the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme that ships with this laptop’s bigger brother. There are two variants of this processor available to manufacturers, with 12-core and 18-core options – the Zenbook A14 (2026) ships with the latter. 

Logo - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Logo - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The difference between this chip and the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme appears to be clock speeds, with this chip rated for a max boost clock across single or dual cores of 4.7GHz (against the Elite Extreme’s 5GHz) and a max multi-core frequency of 3.4GHz (against the Elite Extreme’s 3.6GHz).

Qualcomm is touting major gains in both single and multi-core performance with this new 18-core chip, which I’d certainly wager is true in comparing it to laptops with the Snapdragon X Elite chip. 

Advertisement
Profile - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Profile - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

As you’d expect, the numbers here aren’t quite as strong as with the 16-inch variant, but the difference is only a few percentage points in the synthetic benchmarks. It is much the same story, though, with especially high single-core scores in Geekbench 6 that push this laptop into Apple Silicon territory for comparison, plus much-improved multi-core scores, too. 

The improvements in Cinebench R23 are slightly more modest and peg this laptop back a smidgen, but there are nonetheless some substantial improvements to be proud of in synthetic terms against the original Snapdragon X Elite chip.

Right Ports - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Right Ports - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

There is also a major improvement to the Adreno iGPU with the Snapdragon X2 Elite, which provided a doubling in the 3DMark Time Spy test and brings it more into line with more recent iGPUs fitted to x86-based laptop chips from Intel and AMD. 

Gaming is technically plausible on the Zenbook A14 (2026) as a result, although the 23.76fps and 23fps at 1080p in Cyberpunk 2077 and Returnal are an indication that there’s still some way to go before these Arm-based chips can go up against Panther Lake.

Lid - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Lid - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

We’ve got 32GB of DDR5 RAM with this laptop to provide lots of headroom, plus a capacious 1TB SSD. Speeds here are pretty good, too, with tested reads and writes of 7066.43MB/s and 6021.67MB/s, respectively.

Advertisement

Test Data

  Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) Asus Zenbook A16 (2026) Apple MacBook Pro M4 Acer Swift Edge 14 AI
PCMark 10 7208
Cinebench R23 multi core 12396 14569 13830 9375
Cinebench R23 single core 1593 1579 2187 1928
Geekbench 6 single core 3699 3711 3767 2740
Geekbench 6 multi core 19254 21940 14955 11294
3DMark Time Spy 3965 4317 4449
CrystalDiskMark Read speed 7066.43 MB/s 7101.27 MB/s 2911.8 MB/s 4803.75 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark Write Speed 6021.67 MB/s 5739.05 MB/s 3335.7 MB/s 3910.54 MB/s
Brightness (SDR) 379.4 nits 467.4 nits 900 nits 380.7 nits
Brightness (HDR) 600 nits 1000 nits 1500 nits
Black level 0.01 nits 0.01 nits 0.01 nits
Contrast ratio 29500:1 34100:1 27800:1
White Visual Colour Temperature 6600 K 6600 K 6700 K
sRGB 100 % 100 % 100 %
Adobe RGB 95 % 94 % 92 %
DCI-P3 100 % 100 % 99 % 100 %
PCMark Battery (office) 22.5 hrs 19.25 hrs 16 hrs
Battery discharge after 60 minutes of online Netflix playback -2 % 2 % 94 % 7 %
Battery recharge time 68 mins 95 mins 80 mins
Cyberpunk 2077 (Quad HD) 16.69 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (Full HD) 23.67 fps 28.24 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (Full HD + RT) 4.33 fps
Returnal (Quad HD) 24 fps
Returnal (Full HD) 23 fps 31 fps

Software

  • Copilot+ PC offers AI smarts
  • Reasonably clean Windows 11 install
  • Small compatibility issues, being Arm-based

The Zenbook A14 (2026) comes with Windows 11 and a reasonably clean install, too. There isn’t much in the way of bloatware with regard to an unwanted anti-virus or similar, although there are some pieces of software courtesy of Asus that come pre-installed.

There is MyAsus, which comes as part of the taskbar when you first open the Zenbook S 16. This is where you can check on everything from battery level and enabling battery care modes to choosing which type of workload this laptop’s network connection prioritises.

Copilot Key - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Copilot Key - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

In addition, there is GlideX, where you can manage tasks such as wirelessly casting or mirroring the Zenbook A14 (2026)’s screen to other devices, or transferring files over the same network. You can also enable remote access to a mobile device, too. The Storybook app is designed as another way to organise photos and videos, using AI to recognise faces and file them for you, which is handy.

There is also enough AI horsepower from the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme chip inside to mark this laptop as a Copilot+ PC, providing access to Microsoft’s AI functionality for generative powers and filters in the Photos and Paint app, as well as the clever Windows Studio webcam effects for background blurring, auto framing and maintaining eye contact. With the latest version of Windows 11, there is also the controversial Microsoft Recall feature.

Logo - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)Logo - Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Being ARM-based, the Zenbook A14 (2026) also has minor compatibility issues. This is because Windows has traditionally run on x86-based systems, so to run on ARM, apps have had to be translated using Microsoft’s Prism translation software. For the most part, I had few compatibility issues when running a range of benchmark software, as well as Photoshop and similar apps.

As with other Arm-based Windows laptops I’ve looked at, the PCMark 10 benchmark app doesn’t run fully, but that’s an issue we’ve seen on other Arm-based Windows systems. I weirdly had an issue running Rainbow Six Extraction in our benchmark testing, which hasn’t happened on other Arm-based laptops in the past.

Advertisement

Battery Life

  • Lasted for 22 hours 25 minutes in the battery test
  • Capable of lasting for three working days

Advertisement

Asus has managed to fit a larger 70Whr cell inside the Zenbook A14 (2026), which, alongside the excellent efficiency that these Qualcomm chips have traditionally yielded, should result in great battery life for this laptop. To this end, Asus quotes this laptop up to 32 hours on a charge, which would easily make it one of the best choices for endurance.

In dialling the brightness down to the requisite 150 nits and running a video loop test in PCMark 10, this Asus laptop lasted for 22 hours and 25 minutes – that’s just about enough for three working days. That makes for a substantial improvement over the previous model by around three hours, and increases Asus’ lead over key rivals such as the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI. It’s still not enough to dethrone our battery life champion, the Dell Pro 14 Premium, which has around half an hour on this Asus choice.

Asus has also provided a small, yet beefy 100W power brick with the Zenbook A14 (2026) that does a decent job of putting juice back into this laptop briskly, taking 28 minutes to get it back to 50 percent, while a full charge took 70 minutes.

Should you buy it?

Advertisement

You want oodles of power in a lightweight chassis:

The Zenbook A14 (2026) packs a lot of performance with its Snapdragon X2 Elite processor into a slender and lightweight chassis.

Advertisement

You want something more affordable:

The much higher price tag of this year’s model leaves a sour taste against last year’s, and it is a fair jump up in price. You can still go for the older model and feel happier with a few extra hundreds in your pocket.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

The Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) is a beefy and super light Windows laptop that impresses with its potent internals from a new chip, immense endurance and a stylish look. The needle has moved a lot in price against the old model, though, and a 1920×1200 screen for the price feels a little off.

Against the older Asus Zenbook A14, you’re getting a lot more grunt and a little more in the way of battery life, although for £500 more in terms of retail price. The Acer Swift 16 AI (2026) provides similar grunt with an Intel Panther Lake chip, plus a larger and higher-res OLED screen (although at the expense of 12 hours of runtime) for a similar outlay, while the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI has a higher-res OLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate and similar computing power for a lower price tag.

Don’t get me wrong, the Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) is a lovely laptop, and a lot of it is in part due to the Snapdragon X2 Elite chip inside, but rising costs mean it suffers the same price-driven criticism as the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro. For more options, check out our list of the best laptops we’ve tested.

Advertisement

Advertisement

How We Test

This Asus laptop has been put through a series of uniform checks designed to gauge key factors, including build quality, performance, screen quality and battery life. These include formal synthetic benchmarks and scripted tests, plus a series of real-world checks, such as how well it runs popular apps and extensive gaming testing.

FAQs

What’s different between the Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) and the Asus Zenbook A14 (2025)?

The Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) comes with a newer and faster Snapdragon X2 Elite processor, plus increased battery life and 10g increase in its weight. It’s also a lot more expensive in terms of RRP.

Advertisement

Test Data

  Asus Zenbook A14 (2026)
Cinebench R23 multi core 12396
Cinebench R23 single core 1593
Geekbench 6 single core 3699
Geekbench 6 multi core 19254
3DMark Time Spy 3965
CrystalDiskMark Read speed 7066.43 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark Write Speed 6021.67 MB/s
Brightness (SDR) 379.4 nits
Brightness (HDR) 600 nits
Black level 0.01 nits
Contrast ratio 29500:1
White Visual Colour Temperature 6600 K
sRGB 100 %
Adobe RGB 95 %
DCI-P3 100 %
PCMark Battery (office) 22.5 hrs
Battery discharge after 60 minutes of online Netflix playback -2 %
Battery recharge time 68 mins
Cyberpunk 2077 (Full HD) 23.67 fps
Returnal (Full HD) 23 fps

Full Specs

  Asus Zenbook A14 (2026) Review
UK RRP £1599
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite
Manufacturer Asus
Screen Size 14 inches
Storage Capacity 1TB
Front Camera 1080p webcam
Battery 70 Whr
Battery Hours 22 25
Size (Dimensions) 310.7 x 213.9 x 13.4 MM
Weight 990 G
Operating System Windows 11
Release Date 2026
First Reviewed Date 07/04/2026
Resolution 1920 x 1200
HDR Yes
Refresh Rate 60 Hz
Ports 2x USB 4.0 Gen 3 Type-C with support for display / power delivery (data speed up to 40Gbps) 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (data speed up to 10Gbps), 1x 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack 1x HDMI 2.1 TMDS
RAM 32GB
Connectivity Wifi 7, Bluetooth 5.4
Colours Beige
Display Technology OLED
Touch Screen Yes
Convertible? No

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

What Makes the 13.6-Inch MacBook Air with M5 Chip a Reliable Choice for Busy Days

Published

on

13.6" Apple MacBook Air M5
Apple released the new 13.6-inch MacBook Air with an M5 chip in March of this year, and its impact is being noticed by users whose mobile lifestyles rely on capable hardware and portability. People who are constantly on the move, such as video content providers, or students who carry their gadgets across campus on a daily basis, benefit from this combination. The aluminum shell weighs 2.7 pounds but is only 0.44 inches thick.



The 13.6-inch Liquid Retina display supports screen resolutions of up to 2560 by 1664 pixels. Brightness is up to 500 nits, and it supports one billion colors and a wide gamut, making what you see in images and videos much more lifelike. The text remains incredibly fine at 224 pixels per inch, allowing you to work late into the night editing documents or spreadsheets without suffering from eye strain headaches. Plus, the True Tone technology is sophisticated enough to automatically alter the white balance to fit the lighting in the room, which is quite useful while staring at a computer for long periods of time.

Sale


Apple 2026 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop with M5 chip: Built for AI, 13.6-inch Liquid Retina Display, 16GB…
  • MIGHT TAKES FLIGHT — MacBook Air with the M5 chip packs blazing speed and powerful AI capabilities into an incredibly portable design. With Apple…
  • SUPERCHARGED BY M5 — With its faster CPU and unified memory, the M5 chip delivers even more performance and fluidity across apps, making…
  • APPLE INTELLIGENCE — Apple Intelligence is the personal intelligence system that helps you write, express yourself, and get things done…


Under the hood is the M5 chip, a 10-core CPU with four performance cores and six efficiency cores for maximum efficiency. You start with an 8-core GPU and can upgrade to a 10-core GPU if you desire. A 16-core neural engine handles heavy tasks in real time, and memory bandwidth is 153 gigabytes per second.

Advertisement

The battery life lasts for even the longest of days, according to Apple, and the 18 hour mixed use rating includes video conversations, document editing, as well as streaming, so you don’t have to constantly run to the outlet. When you use the included adapter, it charges quickly and returns to full speed in about an hour.


On the left side, you’ll find two Thunderbolt 4 ports that can handle charging connections, external drives, and displays. The other edge features a headphone connector for connecting wired audio. Wireless connectivity is also excellent; Wi-Fi 7 keeps you connected even in congested places, and Bluetooth 6 provides crystal-clear links to your headphones or other peripherals. If you want to expand your workspace, the laptop allows you to connect two monitors at the same time when the lid is closed.

Typing feels completely natural on the illuminated keyboard, as the keys have just enough travel to provide feedback without all the unpleasant clacking. The trackpad responds quickly to your gestures, and the big area gives you an excellent idea of where your fingers are. Furthermore, Touch ID makes it extremely simple and quick to log in, eliminating the need to fumble for passwords or other credentials. The 12-megapixel camera in the bezel above the screen keeps your face crisp during video conversations, while the four speakers fill the room with sound for movies or music, including spatial audio.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025