Connect with us

Tech

IEEE Presidents’ Scholarship Honors Teen Innovators

Published

on

About 16 percent of the global population—more than 1 billion people—live with some form of disability, according to the World Health Organization. Many of the disabilities affect independence and mobility.

Three high school students working on inventions to help people with disabilities restore movement, translate thoughts, and navigate rough terrain had their work showcased at Regeneron’s International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF), held in May in Phoenix. Their projects earned them this year’s IEEE Presidents’ Scholarship awards.

IEEE President Mary Ellen Randall presented the awards at a ceremony held during the fair. They also received an IEEE President’s coin, which students said was a highlight of their experience.

Hollie Tang won this year’s IEEE Presidents’ Scholarship of US $10,000 for her wheelchair navigation system. The award is payable over four years of undergraduate university study and includes a complimentary IEEE student membership.

Advertisement

Partap Sidhu, the second-place winner, received a $600 scholarship for his mind-controlled lower-limb exoskeleton. Third-place winner Calvin Shang Hung received a $400 scholarship for his rough-terrain robot. Sidhu and Hung also got complimentary IEEE student memberships.

Established by the IEEE Foundation and administered by IEEE Educational Activities, the Presidents’ Scholarship recognizes high school students who demonstrate an exceptional grasp of electrical engineering, computer science, or another IEEE field of interest.

Controlling movements with a tongue

An Asian-American high school student standing in front of her research poster about tongue-based HMI for motor disabilities. Holly Tang won the 2026 IEEE Presidents’ Scholarship of US $10,000 for her Tonguage project, which is a noninvasive, computer-vision-based human-machine interface.Lynn Bowlby

Tang, a sophomore at Wilson High School in Hacienda Heights, Calif., secured the top prize for her Tonguage project: a noninvasive, computer-vision-based human-machine interface. Using tongue movements and a standard camera, the interface lets users control a computer and other digital tools as well as assistive technologies including wheelchairs. The tongue pad, one of the system’s core features, allows the user’s tongue to function as a directional cursor, while eye blinks serve as mouse clicks.

Tonguage translates the person’s tongue and eye motions into actionable commands in several ways, such as the tongue’s position inside the mouth and continuous movement patterns. The system’s multimodality combines input from the tongue with other facial cues.

Advertisement

The system includes a face-tracking feature for error prevention that verifies commands are coming from the intended user, disregarding anyone else who moves into the camera’s frame.

That is a critical safety measure for a wheelchair-navigation application, Tang says.

Accessibility was central to Tang’s mission. She built the system to run on relatively affordable, readily available laptop cameras rather than more costly specialized hardware.

“Mobility conditions don’t discriminate,” she says. “They can affect anyone of any income, gender, and socioeconomic status.”

Advertisement

Tang initially imagined Tonguage as a simple substitute for a keyboard and mouse. The more research she did, though, the more she realized that it could offer autonomy through applications such as wheelchair navigation, robotic arm control, and gaming, she says.

“We’re so focused on trying to give people autonomy over just basic human tasks that we often leave out things like gaming,” she says. “They deserve the freedom to play games and enjoy entertainment as well.”

Tang, who plans to pursue biomedical engineering, says a visit to a rehabilitation center solidified her purpose.

“Including empathy in your technological solution is so important,” she says. “Empathy is hard to teach in a classroom, but it can be learned through experience, and through actually meeting people whose lives your work might change.”

Advertisement

Mind-controlled exoskeleton

Sidhu, a junior at Bethpage High School, in New York, took second place for NeuroGait, a mind-controlled, lower-limb exoskeleton. He says he was inspired by his volunteer work at a community center that lacked elevators. He saw individuals with mobility issues struggle to navigate the three flights of stairs.

NeuroGait operates by reading the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), a faint electrical pattern that emerges one to two seconds before a person consciously initiates movement. Using a custom electroencephalogram (EEG) headset and a convolutional neural network (CNN), the system classifies intended movements and sends commands to a 3D-printed exoskeleton. Rather than rigid motors, the suit relies on pneumatic artificial muscles that Sidhu designed to mimic human anatomy.

“The pneumatic artificial muscle in itself is so compliant that it’s able to adjust to the limitations of the human body,” he says.

The technical specifications are striking: The CNN achieves a 99.9 percent accuracy in detecting a person’s intended movement, while the full system—from the brain’s signal to physical movement—operates at 95.2 percent accuracy, according to the results from 500 trials Sidhu conducted.

Advertisement

Perhaps most impressively, Sidhu built the entire system for about $276, less than 1 percent of the $40,000 to $100,000 price tag of commercial exoskeletons, according to a 2025 revenue report from Roots Analysis.

He says he hopes to bring NeuroGait to the community center where the idea for the project began.

He attributes his success to staying current with research from institutions and organizations such as Boston Dynamics and MIT.

“To be successful in research,” he says, “you have to know what’s being done right now.”

Advertisement

A spider-inspired robot

Hung, a sophomore at El Cerrito High School, in California, took third place for Math Into Motion: Robotic Hexapod for Hazardous Environments. The six-legged robot is designed to traverse terrain too unstable for humans or conventional robotic systems.

With only weeks before the science fair deadline for entries and no prior electrical engineering experience, Hung began with an idea inspired by his interest in spaceflight: an insectlike robot. He had spent years watching rovers such as Curiosity and Perseverance struggle on uneven surfaces, leading him to hypothesize that a hexapod design would be better for rugged ground.

As the project progressed, the humanitarian applications for his robot became clearer, he says. Watching news reports of the earthquake that struck Türkiye in 2023, as well as conflicts around the globe, Hung adapted his robot for use in disasters. The hexapod’s stable tripod walking gait, in which three legs stay grounded while the other three move, makes it well suited for navigating in collapsed buildings to locate survivors or to carry sensitive supplies such as insulin in conflict zones.

The current version moves using three mathematical techniques. Inverse kinematics converts a target leg position into the motor angles needed to reach it. Linear interpolation breaks each movement into a series of smaller steps for smoother motion. And Euclidean transformations translate the robot’s travel direction into instructions that each leg can follow, regardless of the way a leg happens to be facing.

Advertisement

Hung taught himself how to design a printed circuit board. He also taught himself 3D modeling, coding, and soldering. Figuring out the complicated mathematical transformations to coordinate legs facing different directions proved to be the toughest hurdle, he says.

After seven months of development and trial and error, a critical circuit board failure in his third version nearly ended the project, he says.

“There was a really strong moment of ‘Should I just give up?’” he recalls.

He simplified the design and rebuilt it from the ground up.

Advertisement

“I just decided to double down,” he says. The fourth version of the robot was the first that successfully walked across his living room floor.

He advises aspiring engineers that “if you find the right project and it truly becomes your passion, designing it almost starts to feel like fun, and that’s what carries you through.”

As the three young innovators demonstrate, the future of engineering goes far beyond technical ingenuity. Much is rooted in empathy and a commitment to human welfare.

Through initiatives such as the IEEE Presidents’ Scholarship, the IEEE Foundation showcases and nurtures bright minds poised to shape the next era of assistive technology and robotics.

Advertisement

For Tang, Sidhu, and Hung, the ISEF stage is just the beginning. They can look forward to impactful careers dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

One Man’s Perfect Retro-Style Monitor Takes All Inputs

Published

on

Perfection is an inherently subjective measure, in that one must choose the criteria against which to measure. A perfect circle is an absolutely rubbish octagon, for example. So when you see that [RetroBuiltGames] declares that he has built “the perfect multi-input display for retro gaming and vintage computing” — dubbed the “PixelVision AV1000 MKII”— keep in mind that he means the perfect display for his use case. That’s who he’s building it for, after all! The degree to which you find his product perfect is going to depend by-and-large how similar his use case is to yours. In that sense detailed explanations in the design/build video embedded below may be more valuable than the STEP files and PCBs in the GitHub link above– that way if your use case isn’t identical, you can perhaps learn something on the journey to build your own perfect monitor.

For [RetroBuiltGames] the aesthetic was obviously a big part of it– he’s inspired by the Amiga 1000’s monitor, and a tiny tilting Sony CRT TV.  He was obviously looking for many inputs, as given by the title, and he has an unusually high interest in pixel density for a retro enthusiast. Hence a 9.7″ 2K iPad display forms the basis of the project. The multi-input aspect is provided by a retrotink clone whose PCB lives in a bulge on the back of the unit that could easily house an SBC if you wanted an all-in-one emulation station– it already has a couple of decent speakers mounted in the sides.

Another big piece of the puzzle we don’t see enough of in such projects is Design For Manufacturing– the manufacturing method of choice being FDM 3D printing. The whole assembly was designed in chunks that can be easily printed  with the most visible surface flat on the bed – and if assembly proved difficult, than the parts were redesigned. His explanations aren’t a full DFM course by any means, but it’s good to see these things considered. If you need more detail on that front, we’ve featured plenty of such guides before.

Advertisement

We’re particularly taken by the conceit of creating his own packaging for the unit, and going to the effort of filming an unboxing video for a product he made himself. It’s just a bit of silly fun. We’ve seen boxes before, but generally speaking that sort of thing is saved for when a project becomes a product.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Nvidia discloses $21B stake in SpaceX

Published

on

Nvidia has committed more than $100 billion to AI companies in the past two years, with sizeable investments in cloud computing start-ups such as CoreWeave and AI labs including Thinking Machines and Safe Superintelligence.

It has also invested in Cursor, the code-editing start-up that SpaceX acquired for $60 billion this week.

This week, Nvidia disclosed plans to put together more than $500 billion from a consortium of investors, including Apollo Global, Blackstone, BlackRock, Brookfield Asset Management, Goldman Sachs, and KKR to help finance its customers. Nvidia plans to partially guarantee loans from the Wall Street investors that are backed by the value of its chips.

Nvidia’s largesse has helped accelerate the building of AI infrastructure and binds parts of the industry more tightly to the chipmaker’s technology.

Advertisement

SpaceX is planning to increase its computing capacity from 2 gigawatts at the end of this year to “closer to 10GW [than 5GW]” by the end of 2027, Musk told investors last week.

The rocket maker’s IPO handed huge returns to its early backers. Google owns roughly 7 percent of the rocket maker, according to FactSet data, having originally invested $900 million in 2015. The search giant told investors in July that its stake was valued at about $94 billion.

© 2025 The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple TV adding ‘classic’ films makes me wonder why they didn’t bid for Warner Bros.

Published

on

According to online reports, Apple has added ‘classic’ films to its TV service, and I imagine that some will exclaim that it’s “about damn time”.

One of the main criticisms (not by me, mind you) levied at Apple TV is that its library isn’t big enough. Yes, I’d agree in the sense that its catalogue is not as big as others, but in another sense I don’t agree because the point of Apple TV is that it is small and building a reputation for good quality TV series (less so about the films).

Every service has to start somewhere, and they all started small. HBO wasn’t a giant when it started (in the vein of Game of Thrones, it was more a usurper). Neither was Showtime nor Comedy Central, to name a few.

Part of Apple TV’s raison d’etre is that it’s a streaming boutique, and if it were to license catalogues for streaming in the vein of Netflix or Prime Video, then what would set it apart from them?

Advertisement

The addition of these ‘classic’ movies is a swerve ball because none of them are particularly recent (Arrival is ten years old this year); they’re not from any one studio but a selection of Sony, Paramount, 20th Century, Walt Disney etc and a very curious selection of genres at that.

It seems as if Apple is testing the waters, but what is it a launchpad for? A wider selection, a buffer for when its own release schedule is a bit thin? It’s made me ponder a few things about why Apple just didn’t buy Warner Bros.

Advertisement

Warner Bros. would have been a great fit

Warner Bros. logo grey backgroundWarner Bros. logo grey background

If there’s any service that Apple TV seems to be aping, it’d be HBO. High-quality, (mostly) original content that tells a wide and diverse range of stories. HBO is the standard that every other channel and TV service wants to match.

But Apple, and I’d wager it could be viewed as either ambitious or arrogant, wants to build something, not acquire it. That certainly takes a much longer time, and recently, there have been questions asked about whether Apple really wants to devote lots of money to a service that’s losing money. That said, it seems most streaming services are losing money, though recently there have been signs of a turnaround.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, buying Warner Bros. would have given it a massive library. It would have given it a built-in subscriber base and audience from HBO Max (140 million compared to Apple’s 45 million), which also means it would have given Apple TV scale and reach – the ability to reach a wide number of people.

Apple seems to think that everyone with an iPhone or iPad would be interested in its streaming service, to the point where it’s virtually given it away in the last few years to ensure people come to the service. That doesn’t build a streaming service, at least not in the long-term.

Advertisement

Apple TV’s films are weak sauce

ghosted_Apple TVghosted_Apple TV
Image Credit (Apple TV)

There is this baffling experiment streamers seem to have indulged in, where they make a film, and it turns out to be not very good.

The best Netflix films tend to be ones already produced outside of the Netflix system that it snaps up at festivals. Very rarely has it developed a manner of consistently creating good content. That’s another reason why Netflix was interested in Warner Bros.

Advertisement

Others have been equally up and down. For every Project Hail Mary there seems to be a Masters of the Universe for Prime Video, but Apple TV has arguably been the worst of the lot because it has spent huge amounts of money, and lassoed star names and managed to produce limp and forgettable efforts. At least Netflix has Beasts of No Nation and The Irishman in its back catalogue; what exactly has Apple done?

Warner Bros.’ slate of 2025 films were virtually all smash hits, generating cultural awareness and becoming part of the conversation, which is something you’d think Apple would like to be a part of. This has been a part of Warner Bros.’ DNA for decades, and it’s not something that you can magic up in an instant.

Advertisement

That said, Apple did make Killers of the Flower Moon, but it felt as if it came and went along with the awards season of that year. Apple TV’s films need staying power. They need to last – it needs its own version of The Sixth Sense that it’s just licensed. Films that people remember and come back to. The films Apple TV has licensed are a reminder of just that.

Advertisement

Apple TV needs a hit factory

Ted Lasso promo imageTed Lasso promo image
Image Credit (Apple TV)

I respect Apple’s approach in the sense that it’s creating original content, but it can’t keep ploughing huge amounts of money into films that are so forgettable that you can’t remember watching them, or exist almost as art exhibits, to be seen, pondered about and then moved on from. It needs things to keep people coming back to.

HBO has Game of Thrones, and it had the likes of Euphoria, The Wire, The Sopranos and Curb Your Enthusiasm. Netflix had Stranger Things and it has One Piece. Prime Video has The Marvelous Miss Maisel and Reacher is currently in its fourth season.

They have shows that people keep coming back to. Apple TV has this as well: Slow Horses, Severance, Silo, Ted Lasso, but does not own all of these shows (Ted Lasso is actually Warner Bros., Silo is co-produced with AMC Studios, and Severance was owned by production company Fifth Season until it bought the rights in early 2026). And as good as these series have been, they’ve not dramatically boosted its subscriber base. 45 million in seven years does not look great. Disney+ has about 132 million in about the same time – that’s almost three times as much.

Whether Apple likes it or not, developing and then extending recognisable films and series is what people react to. There’s admiration in what Apple is doing, but there’s also a sense of naivety. For the established studios, most of whom have celebrated their 100-year anniversaries in the last five years, it’s taken decades to reach this point.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Apple can’t take decades of losses on principle, which makes it all the more galling that Warner Bros. was right there for the taking, and it didn’t even bid. I wonder whether that’ll be a wise decision in a few years’ time.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: I Compared Google and Apple’s Flagship Phones

Published

on

Google just unveiled its latest lineup of Pixel phones, including the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. If you’re looking for the model with a bigger screen, consider the Pro XL, which now starts at $1,299 for the 256GB storage configuration.

The Pro XL model has always been Google’s big-screen, big-battery flagship and typically features the company’s latest developments in screen technology, performance and camera quality. That holds true this year, with the Pixel 11 Pro XL fielding its brightest display yet (up to 3,600 nits), a more AI-optimized Tensor G6 chipset and a new camera system that can capture up to 120x distances with Super Res Zoom. There’s plenty of flashy AI tricks to go around, too.

The Google Pixel 11 Pro and Pro XL.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

If many of those aspects remind you of another big-sized phone, then that makes two of us.

The Pixel 11 Pro XL competes closely with Apple’s $1,199 iPhone 17 Pro Max, which continues to hold up as the best premium iPhone on the market. While Apple is expected to launch the iPhone 18 series as early as September, the current model remains a formidable option for those planning to upgrade today.

And if you’re now split between the new Pixel 11 Pro XL and the iPhone 17 Pro Max, here’s a breakdown of how the two flagships compare across key categories.

Advertisement
I Tested the Pixel 11 Pro XL Camera in Paris (AI Upscaling and Camera Looks)

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Design and display

On the surface, the two phones are built rather similarly, with a combination of recycled plastics, metals and aluminum surrounding the displays, cameras and internal components. The iPhone has a slightly larger 6.9-inch OLED display compared with the Pixel’s 6.8-inch OLED, but you likely won’t notice the difference.

Where things begin to separate is with the screen brightness, at least on paper. The new Pixel 11 Pro XL is rated for 3,600 nits of peak brightness, making it one of the brightest phones you can buy. By comparison, the iPhone 17 Pro Max peaks at 3,000 nits. We’ll have to see if the difference in numbers translates into real-world advantages, such as the legibility of text and pictures outdoors. Stay tuned.

iPhone 17 Pro Max being held
The iPhone 17 Pro Max comes in a bright, bold orange color.Abrar Al-Heeti/CNET

The design of the cameras is different, too, both on the front and the back. On the front of the Pixel 11 Pro XL, there’s a punch-hole camera that’s strictly used for facial recognition and selfies. Whereas on the iPhone (as has been the case with iPhones for the last few years), there’s the pill-shaped Dynamic Island that doubles as a status indicator for quick access to the music player, timers, Uber rides and more.

Besides making the Pixel 11 Pro XL’s camera bump slimmer this year, Google has also integrated a new HiLight LED that pulses colors based on who’s calling you or if you’re conversing with Gemini. It’s a modern interpretation of the notification LED found on BlackBerrys and old-school Android phones, and it could be even better if Google expands its customizability in the future. The iPhone 17 Pro Max doesn’t have this exact feature, but the Always-On Display option, as well as the Flash for Alerts toggle within the Accessibility settings, are decent alternatives for staying on top of notifications without waking up your phone. 

HiLight LED
The HiLight LED is included on the Pixel 11 Pro XL.René Ramos/CNET Group

The iPhone also has two extra buttons. The Action Button is the most flexible, which you can program to perform unique functions, such as starting cooking timers and triggering Shortcuts – ordering coffee from Dunkin’ Donuts shouldn’t be this easy. It also has a Camera Control button, meant for quickly turning on the camera, and its pressure sensitivity helps for adjusting settings before taking a photo.

Lastly, each device comes with a set of unique and mostly fun colors. The Pixel 11 Pro XL comes in Olive (an earthy green), Fog (gray), Obsidian (matte black) and Canyon (with warm, salmon-ish tones). The iPhone 17 Pro Max comes in Deep Blue, Silver and Cosmic Orange – the latter of which shimmers with bold, vibrant hues. Pumpkin? Fanta? Cheetos?

A hand holding an iPhone 17 Pro Max
Live Translation on the iPhone 17 Pro Max.Celso Bulgatti/CNET

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Performance and battery

Google says the new Tensor G6 chipset should yield 25% faster browsing speeds and 3.5 times faster on-device AI processing, among other benefits, for the Pixel 11 Pro XL. While I would file most of those numbers in the marketing drawer, our early hands-on experience with the phones demonstrated the processor’s fluidity and snappiness on Android 17.

We’ll have to benchmark the phone to get a full read on its performance, especially under duress and in real-world usage. But the fact that the Tensor G6 is built on a 2nm (nanometer) architecture, compared to the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s 3nm A19 chipset, should give it an edge. The smaller nanometer value implies that Google was able to fit more transistors in the same space, thereby improving the phone’s overall performance and power efficiency.

Advertisement

That last point is important because the Pixel 11 Pro XL packs a 5,115-mAh battery. That’s a sizable capacity compared with the industry average (between 4,500 and 5,000), and just barely larger than the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s 5,088 mAh. So it all comes down to how efficiently the phones can operate, from the heat dissipation of the vapor-cooling chambers on both devices to the computational synergy with Android 17 and iOS 26. The Pixel 11 Pro XL still needs to go through CNET’s battery tests, but it does have a high bar to overcome: the iPhone 17 Pro Max recently won CNET’s Lab Award for having the best battery life among all of the phones we’ve tested in 2025 and early 2026.

Pixel 11 Pro XL and Pixel 11 Pro
The Pixel 11 Pro XL and Pixel 11 Pro in the Canyon color.René Ramos/CNET Group

I can’t compare the Pixel 11 Pro XL to the iPhone 17 Pro Max without mentioning the Gemini versus Siri debate. On the Pixel 11 Pro XL, Gemini can leverage the internet to run agentic (in the background) tasks, such as ordering a DoorDash for you while you’re browsing. Features like Rambler, which filter out filler words like “ummm” and “ahhh” when you’re dictating, are more grounded but just as technically advanced.

Until Apple launches iOS 27 to the public later this year, the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Siri are more limited in functionality. As of today, you can use the assistant to interact with native apps like iMessage, such as sending a text to a contact or drafting an email. You’ll also notice some Siri/AI smarts when inquiring about on-screen elements or via the camera app. 

The takeaway: Gemini is superior, but buying an iPhone doesn’t mean you’re completely locked out of using Google’s AI features. If anything, wait until iOS 27 and Siri AI launches (or download the public beta) to get a full scope of how AI is utilized across the two phones.

All three rear cameras on the iPhone 17 Pro Max have a 48-megapixel sensor.Celso Bulgatti/CNET

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Cameras

As far as the cameras go, both phones feature a triple-camera setup, with capabilities that go beyond the hardware specs.

Pixel and iPhone cameras

Advertisement
Wide-angle Ultrawide Telephoto Selfie
Pixel 11 Pro XL 50 megapixels 48 megapixels 50 megapixels (5x) 42 megapixels
iPhone 17 Pro Max 48 megapixels 48 megapixels 48 megapixels (4x) 18 megapixels

CNET’s Jeff Carlson compared the Pixel 10 Pro XL’s cameras with the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s last year and found the two going neck-and-neck across different conditions, lighting environments and subject types. We’re talking high marks for capturing and retaining details and colors, even when sensor-cropping. 

I’m expecting similar results this year, as Google has put more effort into improving the ease of capturing photos and videos, such as the speed at which Night Sight photos are taken and processed, than anything else. The company is also touting its Magic Capture Mode, which lets you record a video while the phone automatically captures shots it deems ideal. This could be great for taking photos of moving subjects like pets, kids and sports events where getting a perfect shot is challenging.

If you’re less enthusiastic about AI enhancements, Google’s new Camera Looks feature lets you apply film-inspired color profiles before taking photos, bypassing the computational modifications that typically happen between you capturing and opening the photo in the gallery.

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has a similar capability called Photographic Styles, which lets you adjust the tone, shadow levels, color temperature and other settings in the camera app.

Advertisement
HiLight LED on Pixel 11 Pro
The Pixel 11 Pro XL includes the new Magic Capture mode along with a faster Night Sight mode for lowlight photography.René Ramos/CNET

Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Storage, charging and other specs

The charging specs of both phones are quite similar. The Pixel 11 Pro XL is slightly faster, with a max wired charging rate of 45 watts, compared with the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s 40 watts. As for wireless charging, the Pixel 11 Pro XL and iPhone 17 Pro Max both support 25-watt speeds over Qi2.2 with native support for magnetic accessories like Google’s PixelSnap and Apple’s MagSafe wireless chargers. In our wireless charging tests, the 17 Pro Max recharged by 53% in 30 minutes. We’ll have to run the Pixel 11 Pro XL through the same test, but for reference, last year’s 10 Pro XL recharged by 32%.

With Google raising the base price of the Pixel 11 Pro XL this year, its configurations (256GB, 512GB and 1TB) are now on par with those of the iPhone 17 Pro Max. That means your buying decision, when it comes to pricing at least, may boil down to how competitive your carrier or online retailer’s trade-in credits and promotions are.

While iPhones and Samsung Galaxy phones are notorious for getting the most aggressive BOGO and “free phone” deals, Google Pixel customers should find similar buying opportunities, especially during these initial launch weeks, now that you can preorder it. With Apple set to launch new iPhones next month, you may even find a second-hand iPhone 17 Pro Max for less money. And this sort of price comparison is all the more important, as phone costs continue to rise amid an ongoing RAM shortage that’s driving up manufacturing costs. Apple raised the prices on over a dozen products this summer, and we’ll find out soon if the expected iPhone 18 Pro Max ends up following suit.

Check out the chart below for more specs to compare between the Google Pixel 11 Pro XL and Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max.

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max specs

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Display size, resolution 6.8-inch OLED, 2,992×1,344 pixels, 120Hz refresh rate 6.9-inch OLED; 2,868 x 1,320 pixel resolution; 1-120Hz variable refresh rate
Pixel density 486 ppi 460ppi
Dimensions (inches) 6.4 x 3.0 x 0.3in 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.34 in
Dimensions (millimeters) 162.6 x 76.2 x 7.6mm 163.4 x 78.0 x 8.75 mm
Weight (ounces, grams) 227 g (8.0 oz) 233 g (8.22 oz)
Mobile software Android 17 iOS 26
Camera 50-megapixel (wide), 48-megapixel (ultrawide), 48-megapixel (telephoto) 48-megapixel (wide)
48-megapixel (ultrawide)
48-megapixel (4x, 8x telephoto)
Front-facing camera 42-megapixel 18-megapixel
Video capture 8K at 30fps 4K
Processor Tensor G6 Apple A19 Pro
RAM/Storage 12GB RAM + 256GB, 16GB + 512GB, 1TB RAM N/A + 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB
Expandable storage None None
Battery/Charger 5,115 mAh 5,088 mAh
Fingerprint sensor Under display None (Face ID)
Connector USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack None None
Special features HiLight LED, 45W wired charging, 25W Qi 2.2 wireless charging, Gemini, Magic Capture, Creator Suite Rambler, Live Translate with American Sign Language, IP68 dust and water resistance, 7 years of software and security updates Apple N1 wireless networking chip (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2×2 MIMO), Bluetooth 6, Thread. Action button. Camera Control button. Dynamic Island. Apple Intelligence. Visual Intelligence. Dual eSIM. ProRes Raw video recording. Genlock video support. 1 to 3,000 nits brightness display range. IP68 resistance. Colors: silver, cosmic orange, deep blue. Fast charge up to 50% in 20 minutes using 40W adapter or higher via charging cable. Fast charge up to 50% in 30 minutes using 30W adapter or higher via MagSafe Charger.
Price (USD) $1,299 (256GB) $1,199 (256GB)

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Using Starlink’s Satellites To Study Earth’s Upper Atmosphere

Published

on

Aside from global access to cat videos, the presence of thousands of Starlink broadband internet access satellites in LEO has a very pleasant side effect for atmospheric researchers. Starlink publicly publishes near-real-time ephemeris data on its individual satellites. From this data you can deduce many details about the atmosphere at that altitude, including its density at specific altitudes at specific times, information which otherwise would be very hard to gather. Recently, this allowed [Mamoru Yamamoto] to determine the density of the thermosphere using tomography.

In a similar 2025 paper by [Zhuoliang Ou] et al. as published in Remote Sensing, this same data source was used to investigate details of the thermosphere. With Starlink publishing this data since 2021, this provides an invaluable dataset for studying this outermost part of the atmosphere.

Commencing just before the generally recognized transition into ‘space’ at 100 km altitude and below the Earth’s exosphere, the thermosphere‘s thickness fluctuates due to factors like solar irradiation and, with it, the exact altitude at which the exosphere begins. Generally, though, it is well above 600 km altitude. This places Starlink satellites as well as both active space stations (ISS and Tiangong) in the thermosphere.

[Zuholiang Ou] et al. established that the Starlink data matches well with that from a dedicated research satellite like SWARM-B, thus making it a useful source of scientific data.

Advertisement

The innovation in [Yamamoto-san]’s paper is that instead of using the typical two-line element (TLE) set, a more comprehensive tomographic approach was used, which essentially uses more data for a larger reconstruction, with the resolution claimed to be about on par with that of the SWARM satellites. This implies that although these Starlink satellites were never designed to be more than data relays, they may have accidentally become the biggest development in thermospheric research in a long time.

Of course, you can’t please everyone.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Why There’s More Than Just Minimum Ground Clearance To Safely Off-Roading

Published

on





We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

The first aspect that comes to mind when considering a vehicle for off-roading is often ground clearance. However, most four-wheel-drive trucks and SUVs come off the showroom floor with enough ground clearance to explore a variety of two-track roads and trails. 

For example, the 2026 Jeep Wrangler Sport rolls off the assembly line with 9.7 inches of ground clearance and even the 2025 Subaru Outback Wilderness clears 9.5 inches. Compared to something like a 2026 Chevrolet Corvette with its 5.3-inch ground clearance that’s an extra four-plus inches. In reality, the Corvette could barely clear a loaf of bread, while the Wrangler could clear a basketball. There’s even some trucks and SUVs that have higher ground clearance than a Jeep Wrangler.

Advertisement

Granted, if you want to venture off those limited-maintenance roads onto more technical off-road trails, you’ll likely want more ground clearance. My first experience going to an off-highway-vehicle (OHV) area came as I drove my new-to-me bone-stock 2000 Jeep Wrangler Sport to a “Novice Run” hosted by a local off-road club. The trail led through what they called “the rock garden” where I lost the outer portion of my rear bumper while having the time of my life. Two months later I returned with new bumpers, a 4-inch lift and 3-inch-larger diameter tires to sail through the rock garden without so much as a scrape.

In reality, the extra 1.5 inches of ground clearance gained from the larger tires played only a small part in that successful run. Two months of additional off-road driving experience, the improved approach and departure angle provided by the aftermarket bumpers, and the lift kit with swaybar disconnect also helped.

Advertisement

Provisions for safer off-roading

The first step to safely off-roading is choosing a vehicle that fits your intended adventure style. There are many options ranging from pickup trucks and SUVs, to ATVs, UTVs, and purpose built off-road buggies.

If you have modest off-roading goals met by a vehicle of your choosing, there are still some things to keep in mind before setting out on your first off-road adventure. In addition to basics, like checking the weather, trail conditions, and going with a group or at least letting someone reliable know where you’re going and when you plan to return, you’ll want to have a few necessities with you.

There are some essentials that should be in every vehicle in case of emergency, like jumper cables, some drinking water, a first aid kit, and tools to change or repair a flat tire. That kit in an off-road vehicle should be more robust, including provisions to spend the night trailside if needed. In addition, some basic hand tools, extra fuses, flashlights, tow straps, and other vehicle recovery gear could keep you from using the overnight provisions and increase the odds of making it home in time for dinner.

Advertisement

Vehicle considerations for safer off-roading

The best off-roading vehicles are equipped with 4WD or AWD. While 4X4 models are typically best suited for serious off-roading, the simplest 4X4 and 4WD systems may not provide power to all four tires in some circumstances. Advanced, or modified in some cases, 4X4 systems use locking differentials to deliver power across the axles. While popular on rear axles, lockers are sometimes found in both, front and rear differentials.

Off-road oriented vehicles typically feature specialized tires mounted on study wheels that sometimes feature a locking ring around the tire’s bead called a bead-lock. Bead-locks, along with heavy-duty tire sidewalls, allow running the tires off-road at lower air pressures than we’d use on the highway. Lower tire pressures create a larger contact-patch with the ground and allow the tire to flex over rocks.

Suspension articulation is another factor in maintaining traction. Even with the best tires and locked differentials, the available traction is halved if two of the four tires are off the ground. Serious off-road vehicles, like the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon and some Toyotas, allow the driver to disconnect the vehicle’s stabilizer (or sway) bar to allow more articulation of the axle. If your rig didn’t come with swaybar disconnects, there are relatively inexpensive options to add manual versions, like this adjustable front swaybar disconnect kit for Jeep Wrangler TJ and Cherokee XJ models.

Advertisement

Still, the best way to safely off-road is to stay within your limits. Novice off-roaders should go with an experienced group and listen to their advice. Most off-road parks provide maps with trail ratings and many of the most difficult obstacles have a way to bypass them. There’s less shame in taking the bypass than having to be winched out of a spot you shouldn’t have been in while everyone waiting on you watches.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

From furniture to warships: this US factory 3D-prints drone boats using robot arms

Published

on


  • A Florida company has moved from printing furniture to manufacturing military drone boats
  • Haddy built its latest unmanned boat using giant robotic 3D printers
  • The company completed an earlier autonomous vessel project in nine days

Haddy, a digital manufacturing company in St. Petersburg, Florida, has produced a military drone boat using large-format robotic 3D printing.

The company announced the vessel, called the TF-179 Drone Boat, but did not name the customer behind the project.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This R-Rated Film Studio Wants to Be the HBO of AI

Published

on

Demand for artificially generated smut is surging. But the quality of the visual content being created and shared—like on companion apps, where adult performers are selling their likeness to give fans a 24/7 experience, WIRED reported in March—isn’t exactly movie-level caliber.

Rogue Studio, a cinematic AI-generator platform built around adult visual storytelling, is trying to change that. Launching today, the studio, which bills itself as a “playground for creative ethical mischief,” plans to deliver industry-level video production without creative and sexual restrictions. Its marquee product is Rogue 1.0, an AI video-generation tool for making uncensored adult content that is comparable to other pro-level models Hollywood is using.

“There really isn’t a place for a sophisticated creator to go make content that’s rated R. Either they go to these skeezy NSFW sites that are built on outdated open-source tech, or they try to do high-quality stuff but they’re censored up the gills,” a Rogue Studio cofounder, who goes by Mr. Rogue, tells WIRED. “It’s a very fine line between being a sophisticated platform for adults versus becoming just a porn site. And we do not want the latter. We want to do what HBO did for television.”

Rogue, which has subscription tiers ranging from $29 to $299, offers all the safe-for-work frontier models within its system—similar to Higgsfield, it includes NanoBanana, Seedance, Kling 2.0, and others—in addition to its own proprietary models for generating adult-oriented images and video. Using the platform, you can employ multiple elements from several different AI-generator models when drumming up ideas.

Advertisement

Let’s say you have a concept for a freaky sci-fi horror short. You could potentially start ideating on a zombie character using Midjourney, then use Rogue’s AI tools to add more high-definition uncensored features to the character.

According to its terms of service, Rogue prohibits user-generated images or videos for training, and it strictly forbids the creation or distribution of nonconsensual deepfakes, child sexual abuse material, unauthorized depictions of public figures, and other illegal or abusive imagery.

In an effort to prevent bad actors from using the platform to make these prohibited visuals, Rogue has three layers of human moderation. The first is at the prompt level, which searches for keywords and flags them for possible account suspension if it is determined that there is clear illegal intent. The next layer is inside the system, called the intention layer. Bad actors might try to outsmart moderators by slightly misspelling a real actor’s name to generate a deepfake image, so moderators will reread the prompt to assess the user’s intent. The final layer analyzes the image or video created before it is shared with the user. For example, if a user prompts “famous blonde singer” and the image generated looks like Taylor Swift, the image won’t get delivered.

Mr. Rogue tells WIRED that he and his fellow cofounder, both of whom are movie producers, have decided not to disclose their names because of the “real risk” involved in being associated with creating erotic-themed work. “Because of the climate right now in Hollywood and working in AI, you have got to be very careful,” Mr. Rogue says. (WIRED verified that the pair of founders do, in fact, work in Hollywood; they have produced movies with a combined box office of over $2 billion.)

Advertisement

In the wake of the 2023 Hollywood strikes, where labor unions fought to secure guardrails against the unapproved digital likenesses of actors appearing in films and TV, leading studios have been assessing ways to incorporate AI into productions with the goal of lowering expenses.

The friction has led to AI being seen as unfavorable and has created a stigma around it. Rogue’s cofounders know this but don’t want to shy away from the tech’s creative potential.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Jorts Freezer Pocket Keeps Ice Cream Sandwiches Cold on Hot Days

Published

on

Jorts Freezer Pocket Cooler Ice Cream
Summer afternoons turn ice cream sandwiches into sticky messes in minutes. One maker decided that ordinary pockets would no longer do. Brendan Carberry built a battery-powered storage case that clamps straight onto a pair of jorts and chills the treat inside while the heat pumps out the other side.



He calls it the Jorts Ice Cream Sandwich Pocket. Three heat pumps are situated in the center. The Peltier elements move heat from the cold side (which is attached to the sandwich) to the hot side (which is protected by some large, chunky heatsinks). A little battery that fits in the pocket provides the power needed to run everything. And there’s a little remote that allows you to adjust the temperature till it’s exactly right. The whole thing stays chilly on the inside (the sandwich keeps firm) and warm on the outside (so the rider’s legs don’t freeze), which is ideal.

Sale


Instant Pot InstantChill Ice Cream Maker with Built‑In Compressor, No Pre‑Freezing, Real Ice Cream in…
  • NO PRE‑FREEZING, ICE CREAM IN MINUTES*: Built-in compressor and cold plate system rapidly freezes and churns ultra-smooth fresh ice cream, gelato…
  • BUILT‑IN COLD PLATE FOR FASTER RESULTS: Churn in the bowl or pour directly onto the cold plate for even faster freezing. Roll, or scoop—your…
  • 6 ONE-TOUCH PROGRAM MODES: (6) precision pre-set programs deliver the ideal balance of speed and timing for perfect results every time. Make Ice…

Jorts Freezer Pocket Cooler Ice Cream
Building it began with a 3D print of the sliding case, which was a basic ice cream sandwich case, nothing spectacular. Some magnets and matching sewing tabs were inserted in there to clip onto the fabric of the jorts. Carberry put the tabs onto his jorts, removed them again, and sewed the magnets in place. He then installed the three Peltier units in the casing, applied thermal goo to the heatsinks, and ran the wiring. Once the battery and control board were attached, it was time to turn on and go.

Jorts Freezer Pocket Cooler Ice Cream
The completed device resembles a swollen cargo pocket with a cold container inside. When you click the magnet shut, it locks in place. On the hottest days, the sandwich remains hard enough to consume without dribbling down your shirt or melting all over. He designed this precisely for when it’s a million degrees outdoors and all you want is something cool to eat, without having to haul about a large cooler or worry about your ice packs getting mushy after a few minutes of walking.

Jorts Freezer Pocket Cooler Ice Cream
He had previously experimented with building small cool boxes using the same heat-pump concept, which taught him how to cope with waste heat. He’d also built some other coolers that showed him the value of good airflow and large heatsinks, so this pocket-sized version still provides some useful cooling, just long enough for a brief outing or a trip to the park. Battery life is limited, and these solid-state coolers lack the power of a compressor, but they still work.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

OLEDs Have Gained Brightness, Not Burn-In Resistance

Published

on

OLED displays solve many of the problems suffered by LC displays, including color fidelity, dynamic range and power usage. That said, especially in the early days OLED gained a reputation for dim screens, short lifespans and burn-in. Over time better organic dyes were developed, along with burn-in prevention methods that have made OLEDs much closer to LCDs in terms of longevity. In a recent comparison between OLED TVs by RTings it’s however clear that between 2017 and 2023 there haven’t been any major advances beyond bumps in brightness.

The relatively dim screens were a major problem, as they prevented OLEDs from displaying HDR content. This issue has been well and truly addressed, as confirmed by RTings’ testing, but after an over 10,000 hours stress test that simulates about 10 years of regular use at maximum SDR brightness, especially static elements like the CNN TV banner happily burned in even on the newest models with all burn-in prevention measures enabled.

Here the biggest take-away is probably that even if the expected panel lifespan at full brightness is still the same, this higher brightness budget means that you can gain some lifespan by cranking the brightness way down. It’s also essential to keep features like pixel refresh cycles enabled, as demonstrated by [Hardware Unboxed] and their abuse of a QD-OLED monitor where a worst-case 6,000 hour stress-test managed to create some impressive levels of burn-in from uneven subpixel wear.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025