Connect with us

Tech

iPhone Air vs iPhone 17: What’s the difference?

Published

on

Need a new iPhone but aren’t sure which model to go for? We’ve got you covered.

We’ve reviewed both the two cheaper handsets in Apple’s current flagship series, the iPhone 17 and iPhone Air, and highlighted the key differences between them here. 

Once you’re finished here, our best smartphones guide lists our current favourite handsets. Not sure if iOS is for you? Make sure you visit our best Android phones guide instead.

Specs table

iPhone Air iPhone 17
Dimensions 74.7 x 156.2 x 5.64 mm 71.5 x 149.6 x 7.95 mm
Screen Size 6.5-inch 6.3-inch
Weight 165g 177g
Material Titanium Aluminium
Rear Cameras 48MP Fusion 48MP Fusion + 48MP Fusion
Front Camera 18MP Center Stage 18MP Center Stage
Refresh Rate 120Hz ProMotion 120Hz ProMotion
Processor A19 Pro A19
Battery Life Up to 27 hours Up to 30 hours
Wired charge speed 20W 40W
MagSafe charge speed 20W 25W

Price and Availability

The iPhone 17 is the cheapest of the two, with a starting price of £799/$799 for the 256GB handset.

Advertisement

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207955

The iPhone Air, on the other hand, is a more expensive option compared to the Plus model it has replaced, with a starting RRP of $999/£999.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207952

Advertisement

Design

  • iPhone Air is the thinnest iPhone ever, as 5.64mm
  • iPhone Air doesn’t have a physical SIM slot
  • Both have the Camera Control and Action buttons

While the iPhone 17 looks similar to the iPhone 16 before it (and then some), the iPhone Air is a complete redesign that looks unlike any other iPhone. At just 5.64mm thin and weighing 165g, the iPhone Air is impossibly thin and feels incredibly light in hand. 

You’d be forgiven for thinking that such a thin phone might feel too delicate to use, however this isn’t the case at all. Not only did we conclude that the iPhone Air feels balanced in-hand, but it’s also fitted with Ceramic Shield 2 at its front and Ceramic Shield at its back too. This means the handset is protected from scratches, although the front boasts three times the protection as the back, according to Apple’s claims. 

Advertisement

In addition, much like the rest of the iPhone line-up, the iPhone Air has an IP68 rating too and is fitted with both the Camera Control and Action Button too. 

Keep in mind that the iPhone Air doesn’t have a physical SIM slot and relies on an eSIM instead. If you already have a physical SIM then don’t worry, as it’s easy to turn your SIM into an eSIM – as long as your network provider allows it. The iPhone 17, on the other hand, still sports a physical SIM slot. 

Advertisement

Otherwise, as mentioned earlier, it’s business as usual with the iPhone 17, and this isn’t a bad thing. Sure, it’s not quite the major redesign as the iPhone Air, but it feels reassuringly familiar in hand too. Alongside an IP68 rating and Camera Control and Action buttons, the iPhone 17 also benefits from Ceramic Shield 2 but on both the front and back. 

As it’s such a radical redesign, and feels great in hand, we’ll give this win to the iPhone Air. Having said that, the iPhone 17 is still undoubtedly a well-designed handset that’ll suit most. 

Winner: iPhone Air

Advertisement

Advertisement

Screen

  • Both have 120Hz ProMotion displays 
  • iPhone Air has a larger 6.5-inch screen compared to the iPhone 17’s 6.3-inch
  • The Dynamic Island remains on both

Once reserved for the Pro models, Apple has now finally introduced its 120Hz ProMotion technology to its entire flagship lineup. This means the iPhone 17 and iPhone Air benefit from an LTPO-enabled 1-120Hz refresh rate – and the difference is clear. Animations and gaming on the iPhone 17 feels brilliantly smooth, especially when compared to the likes of the iPhone 16. 

iPhone Air - video watchingiPhone Air - video watching
iPhone Air. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

As mentioned earlier, the iPhone Air has a slightly larger display at 6.5-inches compared to the iPhone 17’s 6.3-inch panel. We found both screens were pleasures to use, although arguably the iPhone Air is the happy medium between the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro Max’s 6.9-inch display.

Otherwise, as both are OLED panels, you can expect vibrant colours and deep, inky blacks too. 

Winner: iPhone Air

Advertisement

iPhone 17iPhone 17
iPhone 17. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Camera

  • The iPhone Air has just one single camera at its rear while the iPhone 17 has dual 48MP lenses
  • Neither handset has a dedicated zoom lens
  • Both have an 18MP square lens front camera

If photography is important to you, then straight away we’d recommend opting for the iPhone 17 Pro or one of the best camera phones instead. That’s not to say the iPhone Air or iPhone 17 are bad at taking pictures, it’s just that they lack some of the more advanced features that keen photographers will likely have grown accustomed to.

Even so, the iPhone Air has the least versatile camera hardware of the two, as it sports a single 48MP Fusion sensor at its rear. At this price point, a phone with just one rear camera feels like a major step back although it does have some admirable features.

Advertisement
iPhone Air - back camera in handiPhone Air - back camera in hand
iPhone Air camera bump. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Firstly, the iPhone Air can jump to 2x zoom without too much sacrifice, and overall it’s able to take impressively detailed images with rich yet accurate colours. Even in low lighting conditions, we found the iPhone Air was confident and didn’t take an age to snap a photo at night. 

Advertisement

iPhone air night image lightsiPhone air night image lights
Image captured on iPhone Air. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Instead, the iPhone 17 is fitted with a 48MP main and a 48MP ultrawide rear lens, with the latter seeing a jump from 12MP on the iPhone 16. Yes, the iPhone 17 misses out on the iPhone 17 Pro’s dedicated telephoto lens, but for most users it’s still an excellent snapper. With this in mind, if you’re not quite a keen photographer but do enjoy snapping great shots for sharing on social media, then we’d recommend you lean more towards the iPhone 17 than the iPhone Air.

Canary Wharf skyscrapers at nightCanary Wharf skyscrapers at night
Image captured on iPhone 17. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

However, avid selfie takers will appreciate both the iPhone Air and iPhone 17’s front camera. Both have an 18MP square sensor that allows you to take both portrait and landscape shots without moving the phone. It may sound small, but it makes it so much easier to take selfies and group shots.

Winner: iPhone 17

Performance

  • Although the iPhone Air is powered by the A19 Pro chip, it’s not quite the same one as the iPhone 17 Pro
  • The iPhone 17 runs on the A19 chip
  • We noticed the iPhone Air had an occasional tendency to heat up

Advertisement

In terms of sheer power, the iPhone Air sits in-between the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro, thanks to its A19 Pro. Although at first glance, this may seem like the same chip used in the iPhone 17 Pro, the iPhone Air’s own has one less GPU core and doesn’t boast the same cooling chamber. 

Using an iPhone 17Using an iPhone 17
iPhone 17. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

So what does that really mean? In practice, this means the iPhone Air is great for short bursts of more intensive tasks but doesn’t quite offer the same sustained performance as the iPhone 17 Pro. Plus, as all the phone’s components are housed in the camera bump, it has a tendency to get warm. 

Otherwise, the iPhone 17 runs on Apple’s A19 chipset. While it may fall slightly short of either the iPhone Air or iPhone 17 Pro’s A19 Pro performance, in reality the handset should be powerful enough for most users. In fact, unless you’re playing demanding AAA console titles or editing multiple 4K video streams, you’re not likely to notice a difference between A19 or A19 Pro. 

Advertisement

Winner: iPhone Air

Software

  • Both ship with iOS 26
  • Apple Intelligence is present on both but remains something of an afterthought

Advertisement

Both the iPhone 17 and iPhone Air ship with iOS 26, which is an easy-to-use operating system that, even despite the new Liquid Glass design, will feel familiar for most veteran iPhone users. 

In addition, the entire iPhone 17 series (and the iPhone 16 series for that matter) is fitted with the Apple Intelligence toolkit. While some of the features are interesting, such as Writing Tools and Image Playground, generally it still feels as if the toolkit is more of an afterthought and is easily forgotten. 

iPhone Air - top down home screeniPhone Air - top down home screen
iPhone Air. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Essentially, although we appreciate iOS 26, Apple Intelligence probably shouldn’t be the sole reason you opt for an iPhone Air or iPhone 17. 

Winner: Tie

Advertisement

Battery

  • Neither are two-day phones, although the iPhone 17 offers slightly more endurance
  • Both support Qi2 wireless charging
  • Both took around 80 minutes to recharge

Advertisement

It’s worth mentioning that if you’re coming from an Android like the OnePlus 15 with a huge 7300mAh cell, then you may struggle with either the iPhone 17 or iPhone Air’s battery performance. Neither are terrible by any means, but they’re both pretty modest. 

We found that the iPhone Air struggled the most, as while after light use-days the phone ended with around 20% battery remaining, heavier days required a top-up in the early evening. In comparison, the iPhone 17 usually ended most days with at least 20% left in the tank. 

However, for more convenient charging you can opt for a compatible wireless charger to keep both handsets topped up during the day. 

Otherwise, wired charging is still pretty slow, especially when compared to the Honor Magic 8 Pro’s 100W speeds. The iPhone Air actually slightly surpassed the iPhone 17, with a 100% charge taking around 80 minutes while the latter took 85 minutes. 

Advertisement

Verdict

Generally speaking, for most users we would recommend the iPhone 17 over the iPhone Air. Sure, the iPhone Air boasts a gorgeous design but its tendency to heat up, single rear camera and lower battery life means it’s simply not as reliable as the iPhone 17.

Advertisement

Not only that, but with the inclusion of ProMotion technology, an admirable chip and welcome camera upgrades, the iPhone 17 is one of the easiest iPhones to recommend in a long time.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Is it Possible to Make Learning as Addictive as TikTok?

Published

on

It’s 2005, and the computer room has been vibrating for two hours straight, my fingers gliding across the keyboard copying HTML and Java code while jamming to the latest R&B CD I burned. No, I’m not a computer programming wiz — I’m designing my MySpace page. I spend countless hours choosing the perfect song, trying to figure out why my About section header isn’t bold, and how to get those glittery GIFs to work.

I was in sixth grade when MySpace became popular, and today, my niece, an avid TikTok-er, is the same age I was back then. So after spending most of the summer rejecting my niece’s urgent requests to join in on her trending TikTok dances, I did what any researcher would do — start with “me-search.” I asked my niece what her TikTok would tell someone about her that they wouldn’t otherwise know.

“I’m trendy. I’m into fashion. I like to dance,” she said.

Thinking back to my constant MySpace page redesigning, Top 8 tweaks, and song choice updates, my obsession with getting the page just right wasn’t all that different from Gen Z and Gen Alpha’s TikTok fixation.

Granted, I could easily shut down the computer, leave the room, go hang out with friends, do homework, and not think about it until a new song hit me so deeply I thought, “this should be on my page!”

Advertisement

In contrast, observing my niece and her friends today, I wonder why kids just can’t get off that particular app.

Yes, there have been relative social and cultural changes since the mid-2000s, but there is one inimitable variable: the COVID-19 shutdowns. We heard a lot about Gen Z or “Zoomers,” during the COVID-19 pandemic, coming of age and entering college in virtual school classrooms. But the pandemic shutdowns also forced the newest generation at the time, Gen Alpha, to interact in the virtual world. I remember my niece’s last few months of kindergarten on Zoom. For career day, she said she wanted to be a “brain doctor,” so we dressed her up as a surgeon. Watching the kids excitedly scan their classmates’ Zoom boxes to guess each other’s costumes. Between this virtual reality and TikTok’s tweaks to its algorithms and features, we have the perfect storm for what psychologists call “short video addiction.”

This timeline doesn’t start with TikTok, but its accessible video creation lowered the stakes when the mass exodus from what used to be Twitter turned users toward other platforms that prioritize influencers and sponsored content in its feeds, making the average user a content- consuming doom scroller instead of a participant in —– our not-so-social —– social media. Over the past few years, surveys of user behavior have shown a downward trend in people posting and an increase in influencer and product ads. When TikTok’s low-stakes algorithms made going viral seem attainable for any user who can hop on a trending sound or dance, the rest of its competitors iterated — Instagram Reels, FaceBook Reels, YouTube Shorts — all on an eternally refreshing loop of new content.

With how much time and energy children today pour into videos and social media, it prompts the question of whether we can harness that for something potentially a little more productive: education.

Advertisement

Scroll Science

Can learning be as addictive as TikTok?

Well, let’s look at the science behind why it’s so addictive. You’ve probably heard about dopamine. It isn’t just our brain’s pleasure chemical — it’s also the learning signal that releases after unexpected rewards, especially from low-effort activity, like swiping from reel to reel and finding even better DIY project ideas you’ve been wanting to get to.

We experience either positive, negative, or zero reward prediction error, which keeps us striving for more rewards. Neuroscience research gives us a clear picture of what’s happening in our brains when we’re watching short-form videos. Our brains are constantly predicting what will happen next — it’s one of the ways we stay safe and make sense of the world. Reward prediction error is that chemical magic that happens when our prediction is wrong. It’s the same basic mechanism used to design slot machines and other variable-reward systems.

With endless video loops, when the next clip is better than we expected — the kind that’s so spot-on you immediately save it or send it to the group chat — our brain gives us a small dopamine boost. When a video is boring, we get no dopamine. When it’s disappointing, dopamine briefly dips. That constant cycle of maybe this next one will be great, new information, or useful is what keeps us scrolling.With every social media feed carefully curated for each user, there are dozens of algorithms learning what holds your gaze to feed you more of what will keep you on the app or website. For me, it’s funny parenting reels and home improvement YouTube Shorts. Of course I need to see the difference between galvanized and stainless steel screws for my next DIY project. That’s the sense of novelty and variable rewards that keeps us scrolling.

Advertisement

Lastly, because the feeds just keep feeding more content through the infinite scroll feature, there’s no natural stopping point, so there is never a cue to stop and end the scrolling session.

Recent neuroscience studies show that high TikTok usage can activate brain regions tied to impulse and habit formation. In another recent study, researchers looked at electroencephalogram, or EEG tests, to assess the relationship between youth and young adults’ frequent short video consumption and reduced attention control, higher levels of stress, and learning fatigue. These are the makings of short video addiction, a condition researchers suggest is worthy of a spot in the DSM-5.

We Can Make Learning As Addictive

But should we?

It sounds like a good idea. It reminds me of when adults would say, “if only you knew your times tables like you know those rap songs.” But in this case, it’s not as simple as putting math on hip-hop beats.

Imagine your child or student’s TikTok infinite scroll were actually mini-lessons on tectonic plates, followed by how a basketball arc follows a parabola, and each 30‑second video ended with a satisfying “aha” moment and a surprising new fact. The algorithm could learn what students enjoy and what they are struggling with, then feed them culturally relevant examples with humor and well-timed reveals. It would feel great, and your students might start saying, “Just one more reel,” as they send you GIFs and memes — seemingly addicted to learning!

Advertisement

Let’s look deeper at the science of learning. These techniques would likely keep students engaged, producing frequent dopamine hits, but for information to register as learning, though, we need a little more than dopamine and surprise rewards. Learning requires effortful processing, retrieval, and opportunities to apply ideas in new situations. Otherwise, our educational TikTok app prototype could fall into the loop of attention trap, making it easy to go from education to edu-tainment without the friction of problem-solving that makes learning stick.

This is where the attention trap shows up: a stream of highly optimized, bite-sized “aha” moments can keep eyes glued to the screen while quietly removing the productive friction of wrestling with problems, making choices, and getting feedback — the very processes that strengthen memory, understanding, and transfer. When the system does all the cognitive heavy lifting, students get edu‑tainment: they feel informed and interested, but they have not built the durable mental models that let them explain, use, or remember the ideas later.

Learning takes more than clever hooks and sticky formats. Digital experiences can be engaging — even addictive — but if they skip struggle and retrieval, they risk producing the illusion of learning rather than the real thing. As educators, the goal is not to compete with short‑form platforms on sheer stickiness, but to design experiences where attention is channeled into thinking, problem‑solving, and revisiting ideas over time.

Education apps can be addictive, but I’m not sure we want them to be. Then there might be too many people like me — addicted to the infinite scroll of YouTube Shorts on neuroscience and psychology research.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Have We Been Thinking About Exercise Wrong for Half a Century?

Published

on

“After a half-century asking us to exercise more, doctors and physiologists say we have been thinking about it wrong,” writes Washington Post columnist Michael J. Coren.

U.S. and World Health Organization guidelines no longer specify a minimum duration of moderate or vigorous aerobic activity.”

Movement-tracking studies show even tiny, regular bursts of effort — as short as 30 seconds — can capture many of the health benefits of the gym. Climbing two to three flights of stairs a few times per day could change your life. Experts call it VILPA, or vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity. “The message now is that all activity counts,” said Martin Gibala, a professor and former chair of the kinesiology department at McMaster University in Canada… Just taking the stairs daily is associated with lower body weight and cutting the risk of stroke and heart disease — the leading (and largely preventable) cause of death globally. While it may not burn many calories (most exercise doesn’t), it does appear to extend your health span. Leg power — a measure of explosive muscle strength — was a stronger predictor of brain aging than any lifestyle factors measured in a 2015 study in the journal Gerontology…

Advertisement

How little activity can you do? Four minutes daily. Essentially, a few flights of stairs at a vigorous pace. That’s the effort [Emmanuel Stamatakis, a professor of physical activity and population health at the University of Sydney] found delivered significant health benefits in that 2022 study of British non-exercisers. “We saw benefits from the first minute,” Stamatakis said. For Americans, the effect is even more dramatic: a 44 percent drop in deaths, according to a peer-reviewed paper recently accepted for publication. “We showed for the first time that vigorous intensity, even if it’s done as part of the day-to-day routine, not in a planned and structured manner, works miracles,” Stamatakis said. “The key principle here is start with one, two minutes a day. The focus should be on making sure that it’s something that you can incorporate into your daily routine. Then you can start thinking about increasing the dose.”

Intensity is the most important factor. You won’t break a sweat in a brief burst, but you do need to feel it. A highly conditioned athlete might need to sprint to reach vigorous territory. But many people need only to take the stairs. Use your breathing as a guide, Stamatakis said: If you can sing, it’s light intensity. If you can speak but not sing, you’re entering moderate exertion. If you can’t hold a conversation, it’s vigorous. The biggest benefits come from moderate to vigorous movement. One minute of incidental vigorous activity prevents premature deaths, heart attacks or strokes as well as about three minutes of moderate activity or 35 to 49 minutes of light activity.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

EU says TikTok faces large fine over “addictive design”

Published

on

TikTok

The European Commission said today that TikTok is facing a fine because its addictive features, including infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications, and personalized recommendation systems, are breaching the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).

According to preliminary findings, TikTok has failed to adequately assess how these features could harm users’ physical and mental well-being, including minors and vulnerable adults.

The commission found that TikTok fuels the users’ urge to keep scrolling and shifts their brains into “autopilot mode” by constantly rewarding users with new content, potentially reducing self-control and leading to compulsive behavior.

Wiz

TikTok has also disregarded important indicators of compulsive use, including the time minors spend on the app at night and how frequently users open it, the commission added.

If the findings are confirmed, the violations could trigger a fine of up to 6% of TikTok’s global annual turnover. To avoid being fined for violating the EU’s digital regulations, the commission said TikTok needs to change its core service design by implementing screen time breaks, adapting its recommendation system, and disabling key addictive features.

Advertisement

“Social media addiction can have detrimental effects on the developing minds of children and teens, said EU tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen on Friday.

“The Digital Services Act makes platforms responsible for the effects they can have on their users. In Europe, we enforce our legislation to protect our children and our citizens online.”

The commission added that while TikTok has some mitigation measures, such as parental controls and screen-time management tools, these are likely ineffective because they are easy to dismiss and require parents to enable them manually.

In November, French prosecutors opened a criminal investigation into TikTok, accusing it of failing to safeguard the mental health of children.

Advertisement

The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) fined TikTok €530 million (over $601 million) in May 2025 for illegally transferring the personal data of users in the European Economic Area (EEA) to China, in violation of the EU’s GDPR data protection regulations.

Two years earlier, the Irish watchdog slapped TikTok with a €345 million ($368 million) fine for violating children’s privacy by processing their data and employing “dark patterns” during registration and video posting.

Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.

In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This HP OMEN 16 deal is the sweet spot: 2K/144Hz gaming for just over $1,000

Published

on

Gaming laptops get expensive fast, especially once you start asking for a sharper display and enough storage to avoid constant uninstalling. That’s why the “good screen, good GPU, sensible storage” tier is where the best deals live. The HP OMEN 16 is $1,059.99, saving you $420 off the $1,479.99 compared value. For a 16-inch machine with a 2K 144Hz panel, RTX 5060, and a 1TB SSD, this is a strong value if you want one laptop that can do games, work, and everything in between.

What you’re getting

This laptop pairs an Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (2025) with 16GB memory, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, and a 1TB SSD. The screen is the star: 16 inches, 2K resolution, and a 144Hz refresh rate. That combination is ideal for the kind of gaming people actually do on a laptop: crisp visuals when you’re exploring single-player worlds, and smoother motion when you’re jumping into competitive titles.

The 1TB SSD matters more than it sounds like. Modern games are huge, and a lot of “deal” laptops quietly cut storage to hit the price. Here, you get enough room to keep several big games installed and still have space for school or work files.

Why it’s worth it

This deal hits the practical upgrade trifecta:

Advertisement
  • 2K + 144Hz gives you a noticeably nicer experience than basic 1080p panels
  • RTX 5060 is the right class of GPU for modern gaming, approaching extreme pricing
  • 1TB storage keeps the laptop usable long-term

It’s also a good pick if you want a machine that can double as a productivity laptop. A strong CPU, a high-resolution screen, and plenty of storage make it comfortable for everyday tasks, creative work, and multitasking, not just gaming.

One realistic note: 16GB RAM is fine for most people, but if you plan to stream, edit, and game at the same time, memory is often the first upgrade worth considering later. The good news is that’s usually easier than upgrading a GPU.

The bottom line

At $1,059.99, this HP OMEN 16 is a strong value if you want a sharper 2K 144Hz display, a modern RTX 5060 GPU, and a roomy 1TB SSD in a single laptop that can handle both gaming and daily life. If you only play lightweight games, you can spend less. But if you want a laptop that feels genuinely capable across current titles and won’t feel cramped a year from now, this discount is worth taking.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Trump Mobile’s T1 Phone is apparently still coming, but it’ll be uglier and more expensive

Published

on

Trump Mobile is already failing to deliver on some early promises, according to the latest report from The Verge. The report revealed the near-final design of the T1 smartphone and uncovered some major changes with pricing and manufacturing.

The Verge spoke with Don Hendrickson and Eric Thomas, two of the three execs behind Trump Mobile, about the company’s first smartphone, which will get a more expensive price tag and no longer boast being made in the USA. Thanks to a screenshot from the report, we can see that the latest T1 design also changed the camera array, which first resembled the iPhone’s but now has three cameras in a misaligned vertical stack.

As for the price, Hendrickson told The Verge that anyone who paid the $100 deposit will still pay $499 total for the T1 as an “introductory price,” but that later customers could fork up to $999. Thomas also revealed that the T1 smartphone will go through “final assembly” in Miami and no longer be “proudly designed and built in the United States,” as seen in the introductory press release. Instead, the website now shows a description that says, “with American hands behind every device.” We still don’t have a release date — and now we don’t even have a final price — but the website still claims the T1 smartphone will be released “later this year.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Sony’s Biggest QLED Screens See Big Discounts This Weekend

Published

on

When we cover televisions, we often talk about the most popular 55 and 65-inch versions, but as someone with an 85-inch TV in their guest room, I know the appeal of an oversized screen. Today, I’ve got a deal for you on the larger end of Sony’s Bravia 9 Series screens, with a $900 discount on the 75-inch model, and a massive $1,800 markdown on the 85-inch version.

Image may contain: Computer Hardware, Electronics, Hardware, Monitor, Screen, TV, and Person

In addition to taking up an entire wall of your living room, these big screens are also super bright, reaching a stated 3,000 nits of peak brightness. Our reviewer Ryan Waniata, watching Moana, noted that “the sun blazed to near eye-squinting levels.” It’s helped along by quantum dots, which help colors look bright and real, even with the brightness cranked up.

While the viewing angles can’t quite compete with the best OLED screens, Sony has some tricks up its sleeve, like antireflection coating and wide-panel tech, which should make sure everyone on the couch has a good view. The occasional rainbow that pops up as a result is most noticeable with dark scenes in a well-lit room, which isn’t exactly the best viewing condition regardless of screen size or panel type.

It isn’t all perfect, unfortunately. There are only two HDMI 2.1 ports, and only one of them is the eARC port, so it’s likely to be tied up with your sound bar. Sharp-eyed viewers may also spot some uniformity issues, particularly around the edges of the screen.

If you don’t feel like you’re ready for the big leagues, or you just don’t have the space in your living room, the 65-inch model of the Sony Bravia 9 is marked down to $2,000, a $1,000 discount, and is a more average sized display. Still, if you can spare the room on your wall, the 75-inch model is just $2,600 and very impressive, and the 85-inch version, while truly gargantuan, is deeply discounted to $3,000. If you’re not sold on the Sony, make sure to swing by our roundup of the best televisions, which also included OLED and QD-OLED options, or check out the full review of the Bravia 9 to see why we recommend it so highly.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

555-Based Square-Wave And Triangle-Wave Function Generator Build For Beginners

Published

on

Over on YouTube [Andrew Neal] has a Function Generator Build for Beginners.

This is the 555 circuit we are building taken from the datasheetAs beginner videos go this one is fairly comprehensive. [Andrew] shows us how to build a square-wave generator on a breadboard using a 555 timer, explaining how its internal flip-flop is controlled by added resistance and capacitance to become a relaxation oscillator. He shows how to couple a potentiometer to vary the frequency.

He then adds an integrator built from a TL082 dual op amp to convert the circuit to a triangle-wave generator, using its second op amp to build a binary inverter. He notes that a binary inverter is usually implemented with a comparator, but he uses the op amp because it was spare and could be put to good use. Again, potentiometers are added for frequency control, in this case a 1 MΩ pot for coarse control and a 10 kΩ pot for fine control. He ends with a challenge to the viewer: how can this circuit be modified to be a sine-wave generator? Sound off in the comments if you have some ideas!

If you’re interested to know more about function generators check out A Function Generator From The Past and Budget Brilliance: DHO800 Function Generator.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Feb. 8

Published

on

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.


It’s Super Bowl Sunday! Fittingly, today’s Mini Crossword includes some related clues. Read on for all the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Advertisement

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.

completed-nyt-mini-crossword-puzzle-for-feb-8-2026.png

The completed NYT Mini Crossword puzzle for Feb. 8, 2026.

Advertisement

NYT/Screenshot by CNET

Mini across clues and answers

1A clue: The Eagles have the only N.F.L. logo that faces this way
Answer: LEFT

5A clue: Statement that’s self-evidently true
Answer: AXIOM

7A clue: Wash vigorously
Answer: SCRUB

Advertisement

8A clue: Classic opera set in Rome
Answer: TOSCA

9A clue: To the ___ degree
Answer: NTH

Mini down clues and answers

1D clue: Fourth place in an N.F.L. division, for example
Answer: LAST

2D clue: Former inmate, informally
Answer: EXCON

Advertisement

3D clue: Successful gain of ten yards, when combined with this answer’s direction?
Answer: FIRST

4D clue: Trip to the end zone, when combined with this answer’s direction?
Answer: TOUCH

6D clue: Deg. held by many a C.E.O.
Answer: MBA

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

NYT Connections hints and answers for Sunday, February 8 (game #973)

Published

on

Good morning! Let’s play Connections, the NYT’s clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need Connections hints.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

England vs Nepal Free Streams: TV Channels, Squads & Preview

Published

on

England will start their 2026 T20 World Cup campaign against Nepal on February 8 in Mumbai. England has won 2 T20I World Cups so far, first in 2010 and then again in 2022. However, the last time they toured India for an ICC event during the 2023 50-over World Cup, they were knocked out in the group stages after finishing at 7th (out of 10 teams) on the points table. They’ll be keen not to repeat the same mistakes on similar Indian pitches.

If you’re away from home right now you can use a VPN to unblock your usual stream from anywhere.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025