Tech
iPhone Fold again rumored to feature Samsung-made display
Displays for the iPhone Fold and touchscreen MacBook Pro will come from Samsung, while LG will make screens for the Apple Watch Series 12, says a repeat rumor.
Apple’s first foldable iPhone is slated to debut in 2026. While it will mark Apple’s entry into new smartphone territory, its displays will seemingly be produced by a tried-and-true Apple supply chain partner.
On Tuesday, mere days after the claim of Samsung OLED panels on the iPhone Fold was repeated, yet another report said the same thing. As 9to5mac points out, ET News says OLED screens for the iPhone Fold, iPad mini, and touchscreen MacBook Pro will be provided exclusively by Samsung Display.
Supposedly, Samsung Display is set to produce 10 million OLED panels for the iPhone Fold and 2 million for a future iPad mini. The publication claims the production of iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and iPad mini displays has already begun, with the production of iPhone Fold display hardware expected to follow.
As for the long-rumored OLED MacBook Pro, Tuesday’s report says that panel production will begin in July 2026, once Samsung Display’s 8.6th-generation OLED line becomes operational.
Repeat rumors dating back to 2024
As far back as April 2025, it was reported that the iPhone Fold would feature a Samsung-made OLED panel. In September 2025, the president of Samsung Display said that the company would provide foldable OLED displays to a North American client, presumably Apple.
As with the iPhone Fold, rumors of Samsung-made OLED panels for the MacBook Pro go back to at least September 2025. Claims of Samsung making an OLED iPad mini display for 2026 go back even further, to May 2024.
In that regard, Tuesday’s display-related report is arguably nothing more than a “me too” rumor, with no significant new information.
Even when discussing LG Display’s role in the Apple supply chain, the report only backs up earlier rumors. On June 2, 2026, it was said that LG Display would produce screens for the Apple Watch Series 12. Tuesday’s rumor reiterates that claim, adding that 34 million panels will be made for the device.
Chinese supplier BOE, meanwhile, won’t produce any displays for the iPhone Fold, OLED MacBook Pro, iPhone 18 Pro, or iPhone 18 Pro Max. Again, this is something that was already said in May 2026.
Overall, the display-focused report published on Tuesday doesn’t reveal much of anything. It reiterates claims others have already made and states the obvious.
Tech
Prime Day 2026 Apple Deals Day 2
Day 2 of Prime Day 2026 deepens Apple discounts, led by a new $100 markdown on every iPad mini 7 configuration, alongside record-low prices on AirPods Max 2 and the Apple Watch Series 11. Here are the deals worth buying.
The second day of Prime Day is well underway, with Apple’s iPad mini getting a steeper markdown at $100 off. Plus, grab some of the year’s lowest prices on dozens of products before Amazon’s shopping event ends.
Top 10 Prime Day deals on Apple
AirPods on sale from $99
AirPods prices have dipped to as low as $99 this Prime Day, with AirPods Pro 3 coming in as a top-seller this Prime Day. The 2026 AirPods Max 2 have also hit a record-low $399, making it an attractive purchase this Prime Day.
Prime Day AirPods deals
AirTag 2 drops to $24
Apple’s second-generation AirTag has been priced at MSRP since its release, but Amazon issued a material discount on both the single pack and 4-pack for Prime Day.
Prime Day AirTag 2 sale
iPads start at just $299
Amazon launched a steeper iPad mini discount on Wednesday, with a $100 markdown across all of the configurations. You can score deals from just $299 in our iPad Price Guide.
Today’s top iPad deals
Blowout iPad Pro sale
Apple Pencil savings
Apple Watch up to $300 off
Day 2 of the Prime Day shopping event is seeing stockouts on several Apple Watch deals, but there’s also a new markdown worth checking out. This 46mm cellular Series 11 model is now $150 off.
42mm Apple Watch Series 11 sale
- 42mm Apple Watch Series 11 GPS (Aluminum Case, Sport Band): $279 ($120 off)
- 42mm Apple Watch Series 11 GPS + Cellular (Aluminum Case, Sport Band): $379 ($120 off)
- 42mm Apple Watch Series 11 GPS + Cellular (Titanium Case, Milanese Loop Band): $639 ($160 off)
46mm Apple Watch Series 11 deals
- 46mm Apple Watch Series 11 GPS (Aluminum Case, Sport Band): $309 ($120 off)
- 46mm Apple Watch Series 11 GPS + Cellular (Aluminum Case, Sport Band): $379 ($150 off)
Apple Watch SE 3 discounts
Apple Watch Ultra lowest prices
MacBooks as low as $589
Prime Day deals are available on Mac computers as well, with Apple’s budget-friendly MacBook Neo dipping to $589.99.
M5 MacBook Air models are also as low as $949, while B&H is running a DealZone on June 24 only on a closeout M4 15-inch MacBook Air.
Compare prices across dozens of configurations in our Mac Price Guide.
Latest MacBook Neo savings
Prime Day MacBook Air deals
- 13″ MacBook Air M5 (16GB RAM, 512GB SSD): $949 ($150 off)
- 13″ MacBook Air M5 (16GB RAM, 1TB SSD): $1,149 ($150 off)
- 13″ MacBook Air M5 (24GB RAM, 1TB SSD): $1,349.99 ($150 off)
- 15″ MacBook Air M5 (16GB RAM, 512GB SSD): $1,149.99 ($150 off)
- 15″ MacBook Air M5 (16GB RAM, 1TB SSD): $1,349 ($150 off)
- 15″ MacBook Air M5 (24GB RAM, 1TB SSD): $1,549.99 ($150 off)
Blowout MacBook Air sales from $799
- 13″ MacBook Air M4 (16GB RAM, 256GB SSD, Restored): $789 ($210 off) at Walmart
- 13″ MacBook Air M4 (16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Sky Blue): $899 ($300 off) at B&H
- 15″ MacBook Air M4 (16GB RAM, 256GB SSD, Midnight): $949 ($250 off) today only at B&H
Top 14-inch MacBook Pro discounts
- 14″ MacBook Pro M5 (10C CPU, 10C GPU, 16GB, 1TB, Standard Display): $1,529 ($170 off) with in-cart coupon at B&H
- 14″ MacBook Pro M5 (10C CPU, 10C GPU, 24GB, 1TB, Standard Display): $1,749 ($150 off)
- 14″ MacBook Pro M5 Pro (15C CPU, 16C GPU, 24GB, 1TB, Standard Display): $2,034 ($165 off)
- 14″ MacBook Pro M5 Max (18C CPU, 32C GPU, 36GB, 2TB, Standard Display): $3,299.98 ($300 off)
Best 16-inch MacBook Pro sales
- 16″ MacBook Pro M5 Pro (18C CPU, 20C GPU, 24GB, 1TB, Standard Display, Space Black): $2,494 ($205 off)
- 16″ MacBook Pro M5 Max (18C CPU, 32C GPU, 36GB, 2TB, Standard Display): $3,649 ($250 off)
- 16″ MacBook Pro M5 Max (18C CPU, 40C GPU, 48GB, 2TB, Standard Display, Space Black): $4,149 ($250 off)
Chargers, cases, cables & docks
Whether you need a new case to freshen up your iPhone or are looking for a dock for your Mac to connect peripherals, there are Prime Day deals offering up to 71% off.
Thunderbolt 5 docks
Chargers
Cables
iPhone cases
Tech
London cops bring live facial recognition to West End
security
‘Permanent biometric surveillance of the public square’ incompatible with policing by consent, say critics
The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) will start using static live facial recognition (LFR) cameras in London’s West End and Soho by the end of this year following a six-month pilot in the south London borough of Croydon.

Static LFR involves the police temporarily attaching cameras to lampposts or similar infrastructure, with the feeds monitored remotely and officers on the ground stopping people whom the technology matches to images on its watchlist. The MPS said that each of the 24 deployments in central Croydon between October 2025 and March 2026 used a bespoke watchlist created up to 24 hours in advance and deleted afterward.
Civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, which in April lost a High Court challenge to police use of LFR, said the force was rushing ahead with deployment before Parliament has passed legislation regulating the technology’s use. “We are calling on the Met to stop this experiment until, at least, Parliament has spoken,” Jack Coulson, the group’s head of advocacy, said in a press release. “Policing by consent is a cultural inheritance we must protect. Permanent biometric surveillance of the public square is incompatible with that ideal.”
He highlighted the case of Alvi Choudhury, a Southampton man arrested and held for ten hours in January after a retrospective LFR system run by Thames Valley Police matched him to a crime committed in Milton Keynes, a city he had never visited. “It is predictable, given the technology’s racial bias, that Mr Choudhury was confused for another Asian man,” said Coulson.
The MPS said that in Croydon more than 470,000 people walked past the LFR cameras, leading to 173 arrests and one false alert, which resulted in officers stopping someone without arresting them, realizing the mistake, and letting them go. The force added that one of those arrested, a registered sex offender who was communicating with a child under 16, was subsequently sentenced to two years in prison in May for breaching a sexual harm prevention order and making indecent images of children.
MPS Commissioner Mark Rowley said on June 24 that the force planned to “significantly step up our use of technology to fundamentally change how we protect the public” through the use of live LFR, a city-wide emergency services drone network, and AI to analyze the footage from the capital’s one million CCTV cameras. Rowley added that the force needs to spend more on technology but its budgets for doing so have been repeatedly cut, with spending of around £6,000 per person compared with budgets of more than double that at some government agencies.
Earlier this month, the commissioner said the MPS would have to cut around 700 frontline posts after London’s deputy mayor for policing and crime, Kaya Comer-Schwartz, refused to approve its plan to award a major contract to controversial US supplier Palantir. ®
Tech
Database vendors pitch themselves as the cure for runaway AI costs
Irresistible force, meet immovable object. Tech leaders are under pressure to satisfy growing demand for AI while keeping a lid on costs.
That is becoming harder as Anthropic, OpenAI, and GitHub shift some services away from flat-rate subscriptions toward usage-based billing. Database vendors claim they can help by cutting the number of calls made to AI models and handling the new workloads generated by developer agents.
According to IDC research director Devin Pratt, “demand for the underlying capability is strong, because agentic adoption is already broad.”
Around 79 percent of organizations are either investing significantly in agentic AI with a set budget or already running agentic applications in production, according to IDC.
“The appetite for the data infrastructure beneath it is real,” Pratt said. “The open question is whether the specialists win or the capability gets absorbed into the platforms enterprises already run, much as it did with vector databases.”
Among the specialists taking on the omnipresent cloud platforms and their embedded data services is Pinecone. It carved out a niche as a vector database vendor for users wanting to put LLMs into production. Although that term became commonplace among mainstream database companies, Pinecone always argued it maintained a technical advantage for the biggest use cases.
Building on top of its vector database technology, the vendor has recently launched Nexus – a “knowledge engine, not a retrieval system” – and embedded it in Microsoft’s OneLake, a hybrid data lake and data warehouse environment.
Pinecone’s idea is that by compiling a knowledge base of an organization’s data structure and content, its technology can avoid burning through tokens back and forth between the data and AI agents. Nexus is designed to structure, contextualize, and compose specialized contexts – derived artifacts – in advance of agent demand.
Pinecone product veep Jeff Zhu told The Register the idea was to prevent agents from repeating the same work to understand the structure of business data and its context.
“All these coding agents, for example, are really good at doing a bunch of exploratory work if you ask them a question,” Zhu said. “It’s going to make a call, get the table schema, do some exploratory work, figure out what the top rows of this one table are, and ultimately it will eventually get to the right answer most of the time, but it’s going to burn through a bunch of tokens, because every single time it creates a specific answer to a question, it has to understand your business context and rediscover it every single time.”
Nexus provides a semantic layer of business data for a given use case or outcome. Imagine a finance analyst agent versus an HR agent: it is very possible they could use the same data, but they would want very different outcomes as a result, Zhu said.
“Our system is an engine that can support any number of use cases. Based on your particular use case, and the tasks that you want to accomplish, we use your data sources – which can be SQL databases, unstructured documents, PDFs, and so on – we build a task-specific context which is used for that individual agent’s job or role.”
IDC’s Pratt said that the hard part of agentic deployments has shifted from the model to the data plumbing around it. Agents reason continuously and act on live data, and the traditional split between operational stores, analytical warehouses, vector indexes, and the pipelines stitching them together was built for humans, not software running in loops. A recent IDC Data Management survey found that the two biggest data roadblocks IT leaders name for scaling generative and agentic AI are security and compliance constraints and cost. Fragmentation compounds it, with nearly two-thirds of organizations running 11 or more distinct database technologies.
Pratt said Pinecone is betting that retrieval as practiced today does not scale to agents and that, rather than have an agent rediscover and re-read raw content on every call, Nexus does the reasoning once, upstream, and stores reusable, task-specific context. The idea is credible, and the positioning is smart, moving Pinecone from a vector database to a knowledge layer. Its query language, KnowQL, also includes a budget primitive, and the platform gives a single dashboard for token usage and spend. By doing that work once rather than on every inference call, the design directly addresses one of IT leaders’ chief concerns: cost.
“What is interesting about Nexus is that it treats cost as a design constraint, not an afterthought, with a budget control and token accounting built into the query layer. That is exactly where IT leaders feel the pain,” Pratt said.
Changes in the wider tech landscape have previously forced new ways of looking at databases and related software. The market responded to the so-called Big Data problem – the staggering volume of information generated by mobile devices and web clickstream data – with Hadoop and Apache Spark. The former has largely been superseded; the latter is still very much with us. The demands consumers and businesses place on globally scaled web systems prompted a generation of NoSQL databases like Couchbase, Cassandra, and MongoDB, as well as new distributed relational databases.
Another database vendor hoping to help tech teams manage the escalating costs of deploying AI agents is Tiger Data, the company behind the PostgreSQL time-series database TimescaleDB. It has built Ghost, a technology designed specifically for developers working with AI agents.
The company argues that agents helping build software experiment constantly and need isolation to do it safely. When an agent fails, the blast radius should be one database, not a shared environment that other agents and humans depend on. The Ghost platform offers instant PostgreSQL databases with fast forking, which agents can access through the Ghost CLI or MCP server. It comes with a terabyte of free storage.
Ajay Kulkarni, co-founder and CEO of Tiger Data, told The Register the company had also adopted a new database charging model better suited to AI agents, which typically produce spikes and falls in demand.
“Instead of being packaged at the traditional database level, we provide usage-based pricing at the compute-hour level, so no matter how many databases you have – it could be one, it could be 50 – it’ll cost the same, and you’ll just be metered by how many compute hours you consume,” Kulkarni said.
Tiger Data offers a free tier with 100 compute-hours per month. Users can pay for additional usage in 15-minute active windows. “That really allows for experimentation and allows for this idea of multiple databases, with every agent getting its own database, because you’re not paying on that dimension, you’re paying on the compute-hour dimension,” he said.
IDC’s Pratt said Ghost solves a different but equally concrete problem. It gives each agent or task its own disposable PostgreSQL database, allowing an agent to branch a dataset in seconds and discard it afterward. Because billing is based on usage rather than the number of databases, Tiger Data offers a practical way for organizations to stay with PostgreSQL. However, many Postgres vendors are racing toward the same capability.
“Ghost is the most pragmatic of these. It hands each agent a throwaway PostgreSQL workspace to experiment in without risking production, and by staying on PostgreSQL it asks IT teams to learn almost nothing new,” he said.
Pratt argued that agent-ready data infrastructure is turning into its own category, and the platform vendors are the ones to watch. On the context and vector side, Pinecone competes with companies such as Weaviate and Qdrant, as well as the pgvector ecosystem inside every Postgres distribution. On the agent workspace side, Tiger Data’s Ghost sits alongside Neon, now owned by Databricks, and Supabase.
Bigger platform vendors such as Snowflake, Oracle, and Microsoft are also absorbing these capabilities into the stacks customers know well.
“The independents are defining these categories, but watch the platform vendors. Most organizations tell us they expect to do their vector work inside the database or lakehouse they already run, not in a separate specialist tool,” Pratt said.
Aaron Rosenbaum, Gartner senior director analyst, said that building this context layer is critical for both token efficiency and better answers. “We’ve seen significant development across the industry; Snowflake introduced Horizon Context; Databricks introduced Genie Ontology, and we will see significant growth in the quality and depth of new tools introduced throughout the year. While most of the leading data platform vendors have their own solution, there will be enterprises that look for solutions independent of those platforms that Pinecone Nexus can address,” he said.
He also noted that there was a string of vendors examining the different DBMS workloads created by agents compared with those created by humans.
“It’s driving new innovation across the industry right now,” Rosenbaum said.
As technology leaders try to negotiate better deals with AI providers to keep costs down, they can also look to their data platforms to ease the financial burden created by the often-unmanaged surge in demand from AI workloads.
“There are many options available today from all the major providers, and no clear leader has emerged. History has shown that the established DBMS vendors have been very agile at supporting new workloads, and it’s likely that will continue,” Rosenbaum said. ®
Tech
Mushroom Behind ‘Tiny Human’ Visions Lacks Genes For Known Psychedelics
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceAlert: If you consumed a wild mushroom and suddenly started seeing tiny people around you, you might reasonably assume it contained a familiar psychedelic. But that does not appear to be the case with Lanmaoa asiatica, known locally as jian shou qing, a mushroom species sold in markets in Yunnan, southwestern China. When eaten undercooked, the mushroom can produce vivid visions of miniature people — not unlike Gulliver on his travels to Lilliput. To try and find out the root cause, University of Utah mycologists Colin Domnauer and Bryn Dentinger sequenced the genomes of 53 mushroom samples from across the wider Lanmaoa genus. And despite the reported hallucinations, they found no close matches to genes associated with psilocybin or ibotenic acid, two well-known mushroom hallucinogens whose biosynthetic pathways were specifically examined in the study.
“Biosynthetic gene mining of the L. asiatica genome found no close hits with any genes known in the production of mushroom psychoactive compounds,” write the researchers in their published paper. “This supports our hypothesis of the presence of a novel unidentified metabolite responsible for the unique hallucinogenic properties of L. asiatica.” […] Whatever chemical pathways are causing these effects in the brain, the responsible compound appears to be something scientists have not yet identified. […] By identifying 1,515 corresponding genes across the selected specimens, the researchers obtained a clearer answer to the question of what defines a mushroom species as part of the genus Lanmaoa. There are now 17 recognized species in the genus, including four that haven’t been identified before, two of which the researchers specifically named here: Lanmaoa fallax and Lanmaoa carbonilivor. The researchers say the Lanmaoa family and evolutionary tree can now be more fully mapped out, and some existing specimens may need to be reclassified.
Tech
Google’s excellent Pixel Watch 4 has fallen to its lowest ever price right now
We’ve been waiting for the Pixel Watch 4 to hit a price that’s friendly on the wallet, and Prime Day has finally made that happen.
The Google Pixel Watch 4 is now £239 this Prime Day, £110 off the usual £349, making it 32% cheaper and the lowest our deals expert can remember this dropping to.
Google’s Pixel Watch 4 has fallen to an all‑time‑low Prime Day price, slicing 32% off — making it well worth your time, pun included
Google’s Pixel Watch 4 has fallen to an all‑time‑low Prime Day price, shaving 32% off and making it well worth your time.

That price drop opens up a watch built around a display that earns its place, with the Actua 360 running to 3,000 nits of peak brightness and wrapping the full face rather than stopping short at a flat edge.
Battery runs to 40 hours on a single charge with Google’s fastest charging yet, which means wearing it through the night for sleep tracking and through the next day without it becoming a daily charging ritual.
Heart rate accuracy sits at the core of what the Pixel Watch 4 does differently, feeding into sleep insights, recovery data, and workout guidance in a way that builds a picture of your health over time rather than just logging individual sessions.


Gemini sits on the wrist and responds to natural questions about your health data, training load, or whatever else you’d normally pull your phone out to check, which removes one of the small frictions that adds up across a day.
Loss of Pulse Detection can identify a cardiac event and prompt a call to emergency services automatically, and SOS satellite connectivity means it can reach help even without a mobile signal, which shifts it from useful to genuinely reassuring.
Six months of Fitbit Premium is included, unlocking deeper workout analysis and personalised suggestions for anyone who wants more than the default tracking out of the box.
If the Pixel Watch 4 isn’t quite what you’re after, we’ve tested and ranked the best smartwatches you can buy right now in our guide to the 12 Best Smartwatches, or if budget is the priority, our Best Cheap Smartwatch 2026 roundup has plenty of alternatives worth considering.
The Pixel Watch 4 is undoubtedly the best Google wearable to date; it perfects the sleek, dome-shaped design, offers a unique take on Wear OS 6 with Material 3 Expressive, Fitbit-powered fitness tracking and excellent battery life. It’s not quite as long-lasting as the OnePlus Watch 3, and Fitbit Premium gripes remain, but overall, it’s a package that most people will enjoy.
-
Charming take on Wear OS 6
-
Excellent Fitbit-powered health tracking
-
LTE and satellite connectivity
-
Multi-day battery life and rapid charging
-
Fitbit Premium locks some health data behind a paywall
-
Exposed screen could make it more prone to damage
-
Some AI features not available outside the US
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964
Tech
Spain’s Internet Blocks Have A Flimsy Legal Basis, While Lacking Both Oversight & Accountability
from the stop-believing-the-copyright-industry’s-lies dept
Afew weeks ago, Walled Culture wrote about Hadopi, France’s infamous copyright enforcement mechanism. The so-called “graduated response” – aka “three strikes and you are out” – has been around for over 15 years now, has cost French taxpayers a fortune, and has never achieved any of its aims. As the Walled Culture post suggested, the latest court ruling might finally put the benighted scheme out of its misery.
But even if it does, there is already another disproportionately heavy-handed attempt to enforce copyright up and running in the shape of Italy’s Piracy Shield. It works by blocking access to unauthorized material using court orders against Internet Service Providers (ISPs). That would clearly be problematic, even if it were implemented properly, and well run. It is neither, as academic research from the end of last year underlined. Since the massive extension of its powers a year ago, things have gone relatively quiet on the Piracy Shield front in terms of new developments, and there are no signs that the Italian government has taken the many criticisms to heart.
That’s depressing enough, but even more worrying is that alongside France’s Hadopi fiasco, and Italy’s troubling Piracy Shield, Spain too seems intent on letting the copyright industry attack the Internet’s basic plumbing and thereby disrupt other sites, as well as downgrading the experience of thousands of innocent users. It’s increasingly clear that what’s happening in Spain is now a serious a threat to the operation of the online world there, but one that is still little-known. That makes a post from the Disruptive Competition Project (DisCo), which comes from the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), particularly useful. Its title picks up on the similarities with Italy’s approach: “Repeating Failure: How Spanish Overblocking Ignores the Lessons of Italy’s Broken Piracy Shield”. Here’s what has been happening in Spain for over a year now:
Since early 2025, LaLiga (Spain’s top-tier football league) has been operating an aggressive and largely unchecked IP-address blocking regime in an attempt to tackle sports piracy. In 2024, LaLiga and several Spanish internet service providers (ISPs), some of whom have direct commercial interests in LaLiga broadcasting, sought a court order authorising the blocking of specific domain names.
They succeeded in this particular endeavour. However, LaLiga has thereafter continued to interpret this order as a green light to unilaterally select Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and domains to block, without ongoing court oversight or accountability.
It turns out that the legal basis of the current action is flimsy in the extreme:
The legal foundation of LaLiga’s anti-piracy enforcement model rests on a single, seven-page judgment issued by a Commercial Court in Barcelona on 18 December 2024. This ruling should have never been treated as setting a strong precedent, as it was not the result of a rigorous legal battle and didn’t seriously examine whether the blocking approach is lawful or proportionate under EU law.
As has happened so often in the world of copyright, the companies involved have taken a very narrow, and possibly flawed legal judgment and applied it as widely and broadly as possible, without asking further permission from the courts:
LaLiga now compiles and updates lists of IP addresses and domain names that it wants to see blocked. This process is completely opaque: these lists are not publicly disclosed, there is no independent technical or judicial validation before new addresses are added, and the court does not appear to continuously review any additions.
Once someone gets blocked, there is no redress mechanism to remove addresses from the list, even when they are no longer associated with infringing content, nor any appeal process for mistakenly blocked services.
It will come as no surprise to readers of this blog that this cavalier approach has already led to the overblocking of sites, just as has happened in Italy because of Piracy Shield’s poor implementation:
LaLiga’s approach has caused widespread disruption, preventing access to tens of thousands of legitimate websites in recent years – including critical services such as payment providers and a national health operator. This disproportionate cost is borne by innocent third parties and small businesses, reflecting a mistaken belief that the commercial interests of one dominant party should trump Spanish consumers’ rights to a functioning internet.
The second of those overblocking incidents is particularly serious, since it involves a healthcare provider, which potentially puts people’s lives at risk. According to an article on La Razón (via Google Translate):
During the weekend of December 13-14, access to the Madrid Health website was blocked. While the duration of the access interruption and the message displayed upon entering the website varied depending on the internet service provider blocking access at LaLiga’s request.
Despite the serious nature of this overblocking, which effectively places the enforcement of copyright above protecting people’s health, the Spanish government is trying to wash its hands of the problem:
The situation has become so severe that members of the Spanish Parliament have sought explanations from the government. While acknowledging that the blocks have significantly impacted legitimate websites, the Spanish Government maintains that this is a judicial matter falling under the jurisdiction of the courts.
However, the courts seem to be entirely on the side of LaLiga, since they didn’t even give Internet companies a chance to present their side of the story earlier this year.
In February 2026, the Commercial Court of Córdoba even granted [LaLiga] an ex-parte preliminary injunction against NordVPN and ProtonVPN. This means the court issued a binding order, based solely on LaLiga’s arguments, without notifying those virtual private networks (VPNs) or allowing them to present a defence beforehand. The VPNs only discovered the judgment through the media and are now obliged to implement the blocks enforced by LaLiga.
It’s true that the same court has just rejected LaLiga’s request for coercive fines, and accepted that there was a technical dispute over whether the blocking could be implemented. But the refusal to allow the VPN companies to present a defense remains a deeply troubling precedent, and runs contrary to basic principles of justice. Moreover, as TorrentFreak reports, this latest ruling may be only a temporary reprieve for the VPN providers:
The league confirms that the decision merely sets aside the coercive fines while the proceedings continue, stressing that it does not exempt NordVPN from implementing IP blocks where LaLiga can prove piracy is taking place.
It is the usual one-sided justice that is typical when copyright is involved. It seems that LaLiga is being given carte blanche to do whatever it likes here, and never mind the consequences for Internet companies and their users. As Hadopi fades, and Italy’s Piracy Shield carries on as before, the fear has to be that Spain’s unconstrained approach to copyright enforcement could end up being worse than both.
There is currently a rare opportunity to comment on the issue of EU copyright enforcement in the realm of sports and other live events. There is an open Call for Evidence from the European Commission, which:
aims to collect the information necessary to support the review of the 2019 Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive, and to seek feedback on the challenges linked in particular to the exercise of copyright and related rights in the context of technological developments and potential ways to address them.
As well as that general review of the main EU Copyright Directive, discussed at length in Walled Culture the book (free digital versions available), and the issue of live streaming, the Commission is seeking people’s views on an important upcoming legislative proposal aimed at strengthening copyright (yet again) in the light of AI, which is planned for the first quarter of 2027. The Call for Evidence closes on 25 June, so you have a couple of weeks to hone your thoughts and submit them. Based on previous experience, we can probably expect the European Commission to ignore what anyone except the copyright industry thinks, but it’s worth a try.
Follow me @glynmoody on Mastodon and on Bluesky. Republished from WalledCulture.
Filed Under: copyright, france, hadopi, ip blocks, italy, piracy shield, spain
Companies: laliga, nordvpn, proton
Tech
Alibaba sues the Pentagon to get off its Chinese military companies list
Alibaba has taken the US Department of Defense to court over a label the company insists it does not deserve. In a complaint filed on Tuesday in the federal court in San Jose, California, the Hangzhou group asked a judge to strike its name from the Pentagon’s list of “Chinese military companies” and declared the designation, in its own words, to have “no basis in fact or law.”
The list in question is the one maintained under Section 1260H of the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, which requires the Pentagon to name Chinese firms it judges to have direct or indirect ties to the People’s Liberation Army.
Alibaba was added on June 8, alongside Baidu, BYD, the robotics maker Unitree, and others, in an update that pushed the roster to 188 entities, up from 134 the year before.
In its filing, Alibaba argued that it is governed by an independent board, none of whom has any military affiliation, and that its products and services are built “for retail, logistics, and enterprise information technology, not weapons, defense, or intelligence.”
The Pentagon’s justification, set out in a June statement, was that the company is “a military-civil fusion contributor to the Chinese defense industrial base” through its affiliation with China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, with an indirect link to the state asset regulator known as SASAC.
The designation does not, by itself, ban anyone from doing business with Alibaba. What it does is layer on consequences.
Under the relevant law, the Defense Department cannot enter into or renew contracts directly with listed entities from June 30, and from 2027 it cannot buy their goods or services through third parties either.
Government contracts are prized by technology firms, and the company told the court that the listing creates barriers to financing, sourcing, and partnerships with American counterparties, reducing its access to capital and raising its risk profile. It also claimed the move violates its constitutional rights to due process and free speech.
Alibaba had signalled it would fight. When the June update appeared, a company spokesperson said it was “not a Chinese military company nor part of any military-civil fusion strategy” and promised to “take all available legal action.” China’s embassy in Washington called the designations “discriminatory.”
It is not the only listed firm to reach for a lawyer. WuXi AppTec, the biotech contract research group added in the same round, filed a similar suit on June 11.
Earlier rounds drew the same complaint without the litigation: when Tencent was added in January 2025, it called its inclusion “a mistake.” The Pentagon is not required to publish evidence. The criteria turn on military-civil fusion, broad enough to sweep in companies whose main business is consumer technology.
That breadth is part of why the list has become a recurring headache for the Chinese tech sector. It sits alongside export controls on chipmaking equipment, tariffs, and the Entity List run by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, the same bureau now at the centre of a separate fight over access to advanced AI models.
For Alibaba, whose cloud division underpins much of China’s AI infrastructure and whose US footprint spans cloud, advertising, and research, the designation turns every American business relationship into a compliance calculation.
The timing did Beijing no favours. The June update landed during a fragile trade truce, and a day before Alibaba sued, China added 10 US firms to its own export control list. The two governments keep escalating in parallel while insisting they are talking.
What happens next is a matter for the court in San Jose, where Alibaba and WuXi will press their cases. The Defense Department has not commented.
The contracting bans take effect at the end of the month regardless, which means the practical clock and the legal one are running at different speeds. Alibaba is asking a judge to stop both.
Tech
YouTube Settles Early Test Case Over Social Media Harm To Children
The Google-owned platform has thousands of similar lawsuits pending.
Following a similar lawsuit earlier this year, Google has settled with a minor known as “R.K.C.” who claimed that social media platforms harmed them, Reuters reported. Terms of the settlement were confidential, the lawyers said yesterday. The same plaintiff also sued Meta, Snap and TikTok, with those trials set to proceed next month. YouTube has thousands of similar lawsuits pending, so this second case represents a test run for the many to follow.
“Our focus remains on building age-appropriate products and parental controls that deliver on that promise,” a Google spokesperson told Reuters in a statement, adding that the case was amicably resolved.
The first trial was brought by a 20-year-old woman known as “K.G.M.,” who also claimed harm due to the addictive nature of social media. That person won their trial and received $6 million in damages, with $3 million coming from Meta and YouTube taking on the other $3 million. YouTube vowed to launch an appeal for that case, saying it “responsibly built a streaming platform, not a social media site.”
More than 3,300 lawsuits involving social media addiction are pending in California state courts, and another 2,600 were brought by people, school districts, municipalities and states in California federal court. That’s just one state (albeit the biggest one), but it’s easy to see the size of the problem for YouTube and other platforms if each plaintiff receives a multi-million-dollar award. Social media platforms have recently settled (or are facing) lawsuits in Kentucky, New York City and numerous other US jurisdictions.
Meta and other platforms have disputed the idea that their platforms are addictive. However, a lawyer in the first case involving K.G.M. said the companies’ own communications refute those claims. “This is the first time in history a jury has heard testimony by executives and seen internal documents that we believe prove these companies chose profits over children,” Joseph VanZandt said back in March.
Tech
Get $145 Off The Best Mesh Router This Prime Day 2026
The Eero Pro 6E mesh system is an older Wi-Fi 6E mesh, but it’s every bit as easy to use and stable as the rest of Amazon’s Eero lineup. Eero makes some of my favorite mesh systems, ideal for busy families seeking a set-and-forget mesh. The Pro 6E is a tri-band system with a 6-GHz band for fast Wi-Fi at close range. But you need an Eero Plus subscription at $10 per month or $100 per year to unlock some features, including parental controls, advanced security, and ad blocking.
The most effective way to get Wi-Fi in your backyard is to snag an outdoor router like this one. Anyone with a TP-Link Deco system can add this to their existing mesh network and extend Wi-Fi into the their outdoor space. It’s waterproof and dustproof, with an IP65 rating, and can cover up to 2,800 square feet.
Best Prime Day Router Deals
This Wi-Fi 7 router offers 2.4-GHz, 5-GHz, and 6-GHz bands in a basic affordable package. There are six adjustable antennas, and TP-Link has been very generous with the ports (one 10 Gbps, four 2.5 Gbps, and a USB 3.0), though it’s a little annoying that the USB is on the side. This model also offers excellent close-range speeds on the 6-GHz band, though it was a little disappointing on both the 5-GHz and 2.4-GHz bands.
Tech
Co-hosting & guest list visibility finally arrives for Apple Invites
The latest Apple Invites update brings some long-requested features, like co-hosting an event. There are also some other great quality-of-life changes to the party planning app.
Back in February 2025, the Apple Invites app made its way to the App Store. With it, iOS users can create party or event invitations, manage RSVPs, share links, and more.
On Tuesday, Apple released version 1.9 of its event invitation app, which includes a new co-hosting capability. This lets two or more Apple Invites users plan and organize an event within the app.
Previously, with version 1.2, Apple Invites gained support for link sharing, letting event hosts send web links to all attendees. Apple is always improving the app even if it isn’t its most popular.
With the new-and-improved Apple Invites, hosts can now also choose to make guest lists visible to all attendees. Bug fixes and quality-of-life improvements are also included with the 1.9 update of the Apple Invites app.
Additionally, the app has received new event backgrounds. Its release notes say these new backgrounds will “help set the mood for your next coffee catch-up, boba run, ice cream social, and more.”
Even so, none of the requirements for Apple Invites have changed. Hosts will still need an iCloud+ subscription to organize events and send invitations via the application. Guests, meanwhile, don’t even need an iPhone or iPad to RSVP to an event.
Apple Invites can come in handy if you already have an iCloud+ subscription and you want to put together a party. The app itself is quite easy to use once you get the hang of it.
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Miami – Corporette.com
-
Entertainment4 days agoRenter of Home in Anne Heche Crash Denies Settlement With Son
-
Tech2 days agoMicrosoft accidentally kills epic Outlook email threads
-
Sports17 hours agoTwo goals and an assist by sheer aura: Cristiano Ronaldo just entered the World Cup chat
-
Business4 days agoSoccer-U.S. defends Iran World Cup travel restrictions, says discussions ongoing
-
Crypto World9 hours ago
Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch
-
Crypto World6 hours agoSecuritize Wraps Roubini's SEC-Registered ETF as Dubai VARA Digital Security
-
Politics6 days agoBBC Reporter Discusses Cross Party Criticism Of Trumps Iran Deal
-
Business12 hours ago
Entergy settles forward sale agreements, raises $672 million in cash proceeds
-
Business4 days agoWall Street Week Ahead: Investors see Micron earnings as pulse check of AI rally momentum
-
Politics4 days agoAndy Burnham and the meaning of Makerfield
-
Tech6 days agoAWS enters the context layer race with a graph that learns from agents, not manual curation
-
Crypto World4 days ago
Can Charles Hoskinson Really Rescue Cardano?
-
Crypto World4 days agoHIVE shares jump as $220M AI deal speeds Bitcoin mining pivot
-
NewsBeat5 days agoKeir Starmer Allies Question His Chances For No 10
-
Crypto World4 days agoJake Chervinsky accuses CME of protecting derivatives monopoly
-
Tech2 days agoNearly 7,000 fake Amazon domains registered ahead of Prime Day 2026, researchers warn
-
Tech3 days agoSignal’s Meredith Whittaker says AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’ and calls Copilot agents a backdoor
-
Business6 days agoBrexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England company data suggests
-
Sports5 days agoFIFA World Cup 2026: Canada beat 9-men Qatar 6-0 to register first ever win | FIFA World Cup 2026








You must be logged in to post a comment Login