The designation represents a significant step forward in improving the handling and escalation of reports relating to illegal online content, particularly in relation to children.
Coimisiún na Meán, under the European Union’s Digital Services Act, has declared the Irish Internet Hotline (IIH) a Trusted Flagger. This recognises IIH’s expertise and track record in the tracking and reporting of illegal content, such as intimate image abuse, financial scams, racism and child sexual abuse material (csam).
Established in 1999 the IHH is Ireland’s national reporting centre, through which members of the public can securely and anonymously report suspected illegal or harmful content. The organisation is a member of the INHOPE network, the Irish Safer Internet Centre and works closely with An Garda Síochána, as well as international partners.
In order to qualify for Trusted Flagger status, organisations must prove that they are independent from online platform providers, show significant subject-matter expertise and indicate a history of the consistent recording of accurate, diligent and objective reporting.
Advertisement
As a Trusted Flagger, notices submitted by the IHH will be prioritised and processed without undue delay, the group will be supported in the faster assessment and removal of illegal content, there will be strengthened cooperation between IIH, online platforms, regulators and other stakeholders and additional support for the sharing of insights and best practices on emerging online threats and systemic risks
Commenting on the announcement, Mick Moran, the CEO of Irish Internet Hotline said, “We’re delighted to have been granted Trusted Flagger status by Coimisiún na Meán. The designation reflects the expertise and experience our team has developed in identifying and reporting illegal content within our areas of competency.
“We’re proud of the work we do and the standards we apply to it. Trusted Flagger status formalises an approach we’ve already been taking for nearly three decades and strengthens our ability to ensure that high-quality reports are prioritised and acted on appropriately.
“We welcome the recognition of Irish Internet Hotline as a knowledge and skills-based expert in this area and look forward to partnership with Coimisiún na Meán in our shared mission to make the internet safer for all users, especially children.”
Advertisement
In early May Coimisiún na Meán also opened dual investigations into Meta to assess issues related to how its recommender systems promote content on Facebook and Instagram and whether it is in breach of the EU Digital Services Act. The watchdog announced that it is investigating concerns that Meta is preventing users from actively selecting the content that appears in their Instagram and Facebook feeds.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Typically, when you’re sitting on a plane on the tarmac, you switch your phone to flight mode while you’re sitting through yet another “quirky” (boring) safety video. You’ll watch some inflight entertainment, read the airline magazine if you get really desperate, and wonder if anyone ever buys those random watches for sale in the “duty free” section. Then, finally, upon landing, you’ll be connected back to the Internet and you’ll finally feel like you can breathe again.
Only, this time, you forgot to set your plane on flight mode. You’re sitting at 30,000 feet, and… your phone has signal? You’re online, and you’re getting notifications and emails just like you’re on the ground. You’ve accidentally discovered that your flight has an on-board cell tower.
Connection
When you’re cruising on a passenger airliner, you would typically expect to see little to no cellular signal by sheer virtue of altitude and speed. For one thing, you’re blasting past at immense speed and not staying in any one coverage zone for very long at all. Meanwhile, while you’re probably within 10 kilometers or so, vertically speaking, cell towers generally have their antennas aimed at the ground, not the sky. There simply isn’t much signal available, and you’re zooming around a bit too fast to hang on to any cell tower before it’s disappeared out of range.
The connectivity back to the Internet is effectively the same as any inflight WiFi system. The difference is that passengers are served with cellular connectivity instead of WiFi. Credit: AeroMobile
Some airlines have gotten around this problem by providing on-board Internet connectivity over WiFi. The aircraft features an uplink to one of various satellite networks that provide Internet access, and that is provisioned to customers in the cabin over a WiFi router with a captive portal. Typically, for some painful charge in double digit US dollars, you can purchase a few hours of access to your emails and the Web, often with quite shaky connectivity.
However, there is sometimes a way to dodge the painful fees for onboard WiFI, while still getting online. A handful of airlines have equipped some of their fleets with cellular connectivity via a system called AeroMobile. They still rely on a satellite uplink for Internet access, and these planes generally still have onboard WiFi as well. However, if you happen to switch your phone out of flight mode, you might notice it connecting to a cell tower onboard—the AeroMobile picocell, in fact. Your phone connects to this tiny cell tower over cellular data links—originally 3G, later 4G or 5G depending on the hardware onboard—instead of WiFi. You escape the airline’s captive portal and data charges, instead paying your home carrier for data and whatever fee you normally get billed for international roaming. The ability to do this depends on your home mobile carrier, too, and whether they have an agreement with AeroMobile.
Advertisement
AeroMobile’s service depends on customers actually switching out of “Flight Mode” in order to allow the phone to use its cellular radios to connect to the picocell onboard the aircraft. Credit: AeroMobile
AeroMobile has been around for a long time now, first demonstrating its hardware with GSM and GPRS data links on aircraft as far back as 2005. The company’s voice and data offerings have stepped up over the years as mobile technology has moved on, albeit often some years behind the state-of-the-art in the cellular world. The first planes with 3G didn’t fly until 2015, well over a decade after the technology was becoming established on the ground. As a subsidiary of Panasonic Avionics, AeroMobile-equipped aircraft communicate with a range of satellites that Panasonic has access to over Ku-band and L-band links. In recent years, the company has been developing the capacity for its aircraft to seamlessly switch between links to geostationary and low-earth orbit satellites, with the former offering the best coverage, and the latter Eutelsat OneWeb satellites offering much reduced latency and higher link speeds. Ultimately, user experience depends on flight route, local conditions, and other factors; speeds and reliability can vary from good to spotty on any given day. There’s also the fact that, on any given flight, tens or hundreds of other users may be trying to get online over the same link, which can quickly dry up what little bandwidth may be available in some black spots on the world map with poor satellite coverage.
If you’re flying soon, it’s still unwise to rely on in-flight internet connectivity. Whether you’re hooking up over WiFi or cellular, there are still often issues with coverage, or with systems being inoperative on certain flights and at lower altitudes, even on airlines with the best-equipped fleets. You’re also unlikely to regularly get high enough speeds for comfortable streaming, so you’re better off downloading The Thick Of It prior to take-off rather than trying to watch it live off a server while you’re scooting over downtown Astana. However, now and then, when you’re lonely and high above this marbled sphere, you might be just able to hang out on Discord and flirt with a few friends back home thanks to Panasonic and a steady link to the satellites above. Have fun up there.
Banks aren’t short on AI ambition. Across the industry, there are almost weekly announcements about new deployments, new partnerships, and new capabilities.
But amidst the lofty pronouncements, not enough attention is given to building the underlying architecture that makes any of it sustainable.
The UK Treasury Committee has already warned that the financial system is not adequately prepared for a major AI-related incident, and from where I sit, that warning is aimed squarely at how modernization programs are being run.
Advertisement
Latest Videos From
Katherine Yeung
Chief Risk and Compliance Officer at 10x Banking.
This is a governance problem which stems from unmade decisions; most banks have yet to make the strategic, organisation-wide commitment that should determine what gets built, before anyone starts building.
There is a real opportunity to be grasped by inviting the risk team to be part of design before you begin delivery.
Advertisement
Risk teams are being invited to the table too late
In traditional program structures, risk and compliance are brought in to validate decisions already made. Platforms are selected, designs agreed and timelines set, and the role of the risk function has typically been to check these things, rather than shape them. That model was never ideal, but now, in the AI-era modernization push, is structurally backwards at best and dangerous at worst.
A genuinely AI-ready bank requires continuous data lineage, runtime-embedded controls and a real-time, cloud-native core. None of these can be retrofitted cheaply once architecture decisions have already been made. By the time a compliance team discovers that a new platform can’t meet AI governance or data traceability requirements, the cost of fixing it is prohibitive
Advertisement
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
If the risk function is part of the design process from the outset, banks can build a risk-conscious architecture rather than a risk-adjacent one. The difference in outcome is substantial, and increasingly, the difference between an institution that can operate confidently with AI and one that can’t.
How legacy cores create invisible risk
The story of legacy architecture’s constraints on innovation is well told, but it also creates blind spots that risk professionals can’t see, let alone manage.
Advertisement
Batch-processing cores are the clearest example of this. When a core updates positions overnight rather than in real time, AML and fraud systems are operating on stale data. Suspicious activity that occurs between batch runs is invisible until the next cycle, a direct operational liability as the volume and speed of financial crime increases.
Fragmented data pipelines create a related problem. Continuous lineage (the ability to trace every decision to its data source) is a prerequisite for AI governance. On architectures where data moves through multiple disconnected systems before reaching an analytics layer, that lineage is structurally impossible to maintain without a modern, cloud-native architecture.
Finally, third-party AI deployment adds an additional layer of exposure. When models are embedded in platforms a bank doesn’t have full control over, it leaves compliance teams operating with limited visibility into how decisions are being made.
Advertisement
Under the EU AI Act, which requires traceability and explainability for high-risk AI systems which may credit decisioning and fraud detection, that becomes a direct regulatory risk, and that’s just one of a raft of emerging AI regime banks must navigate.
Risk is moving from chronic to acute
What has changed is the speed at which risk moves.
Banks now have to contend with an increase in state-based cyberattacks on financial supply chains, a trend accelerated by geopolitical instability, with agentic AI substantially increasing the speed and scale of those attacks.
Advertisement
Under regimes such as DORA, which introduce near real-time cyber incident reporting, means institutions need detection and response infrastructure that operates on live data, capable of identifying and escalating incidents as they happen rather than after the fact. Batch architectures don’t meet this standard, and the window to remediate is narrowing.
The EU AI Act raises the bar further on traceability and explainability, particularly for credit decisioning and fraud detection, both areas where AI adoption is moving fastest.
Banks not designing against these requirements are accumulating risk, not avoiding it. The regulatory deadlines are known. The technical requirements are understood. The question is whether the architecture being selected today is capable of meeting the obligations that will be enforced tomorrow.
Advertisement
What risk-intelligent modernization looks like
I have sat in enough program steering committees to know that the moment risk professionals are brought into a modernization program shapes everything that follows.
When we arrive after the architecture is set, we are negotiating against decisions that are already expensive to reverse. When we are in the room from the start, we can design the non-negotiables in rather than bolt them on.
The practical starting point is three questions that every bank should answer before any platform decision is made:
What risk posture must we preserve throughout migration? The answer defines the non-negotiables for any new architecture: data integrity, audit continuity, access controls, and the governance structures that cannot lapse during transition.
Advertisement
What are we engineering against on a ten-year horizon? Regulatory requirements in 2036 will look different from those in 2026. The architecture being selected today needs to be capable of meeting obligations that do not yet fully exist, which means flexibility and real-time data capability are not optional extras. Some of the newer, digitally-native fintechs have demonstrated that building with this horizon in mind from the outset produces materially different, and more resilient, architecture than retrofitting compliance onto an existing estate.
What governance must change so we don’t embed legacy risk into a modern platform? New infrastructure running old processes is window-dressing. If you modernize technology without modernizing governance, you recreate the same control failures in a different environment.
Modernization is not risk-free. But the risk of standing still now exceeds the risk of moving carefully, and the cost of getting the architecture wrong compounds with every year it goes unfixed.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
The fully adaptive Active Noise Cancelling monitors ambient noise continuously and updates its filter at 48,000 times per second, which in practice means the ANC adjusts to what is actually happening around you rather than applying a fixed profile and hoping for the best.
Advertisement
Transparency mode sits at the other end of that, letting environmental sound mix into the listening experience when awareness matters more than isolation, and switching between the two takes a single button press on the ear cup.
Plug in via USB-C and the built-in DAC delivers lossless audio alongside three distinct sound profiles, covering the Beats Signature profile for music, an Entertainment profile tuned for films and games, and a Conversation profile optimised for calls and podcasts.
The 40-hour battery life means a full working week of commuting without needing to charge, and the Fast Fuel feature provides four hours of playback from a 10-minute top-up when that figure runs low.
Advertisement
Comfort over long sessions is handled by UltraPlush over-ear cushions in engineered leather, and both Apple and Android users get native compatibility features, including one-touch pairing and Find My support on the Apple side.
For anyone who wants a serious over-ear headphone with ANC, lossless audio, and a 40-hour battery at a price that has just dropped by nearly a quarter, the Beats Studio Pro makes a compelling case, and our best headphones, best wireless headphones, and best noise-cancelling headphones guides are there for anyone still mapping the wider field.
The Beats Studio Pro harness clear, neutral sound quality, strong noise-cancellation, and an excellent wireless performance into their slightly tweaked design. While they impress with good performance across the board, it’s not quite at the level to supplant the likes of Sony.
In the desert outside Zhongwei, in the northwestern region of Ningxia, four dedicated power lines now run from a field of solar panels to a cluster of computers.
They do not pass through the public grid. That detail, dull as it sounds, is the whole point.
China is encouraging its sprawling data centre industry to plug directly into wind and solar generation, rather than draw power off a grid still heavily fed by coal. The push is part policy, part demonstration.
Beijing’s 2026 government work report named tighter integration between computing infrastructure and electricity supply as a priority, and a national green-data-centre plan now requires new projects in the country’s designated computing hubs to source most of their power from clean sources.
Advertisement
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
The Zhongwei plant is the project everyone points to. China Datang Corp commissioned a 500-megawatt solar farm there, describing it as the country’s first large-scale green-power project built to supply a data centre cluster directly.
It entered formal operation in early May, after green-power direct supply began in February, according to Chinese state media.
Advertisement
What makes it unusual is the delivery. The site uses what Datang calls a dual-track structure: four dedicated 110-kilovolt lines carry electricity straight to the computing facilities, with additional demand covered through bilateral market trades.
Solar output is prioritised during the day, wind is expected to cover the evenings, and storage smooths the gaps.
The solar plant alone should generate around 970 gigawatt-hours a year, roughly half the cloud base’s projected demand.
The numbers grow once the wind component arrives. The 500MW solar array is the first slice of a 2-gigawatt first phase that pairs it with a 1.5GW wind farm and storage, at a planned cost of about 8.7 billion yuan, or some $1.27bn.
Advertisement
The wind build is still under construction, scheduled for full grid connection in September.
Once phase one is complete, annual generation is expected to reach 4.3 terawatt-hours, more than the cloud base’s forecast consumption of 2.29 terawatt-hours. A second phase would push the total to 4.6GW.
The logic sits inside China’s “east data, west computing” strategy, which steers energy-hungry processing toward western regions where wind and solar are plentiful and land is cheap. Demand is the pressure behind all of it.
AI has driven an explosion in computing capacity, and with it electricity use, at exactly the moment Beijing is trying to hit peak carbon emissions by 2030.
Advertisement
The ambition is steep. Authorities want renewables to supply roughly four-fifths of the AI data-centre sector’s power by 2030, up from around a tenth in 2023.
The gap between a single working project in the desert and that national target is the part the policy has not yet closed.
Curtailment, grid bottlenecks, and the intermittency of wind and solar remain real, and China’s green-power goals for AI have already run into the grid before.
For now, Zhongwei is the test case. If desert wind and sun can be matched to digital load without leaning on the conventional grid, the model travels. If they cannot, it stays a handsome demonstration in Ningxia.
Advertisement
The wind turbines are due in September, that is when the figures stop being projections.
joshuark shares a report from Car and Driver: A new study conducted by the New York Times shows that the increase in vehicle hood height seen over the last two and a half decades, mainly due to the rise in popularity of large SUVs and trucks, has resulted in several thousand deaths that otherwise may not have happened. The study shows that while automakers and regulators have focused on occupant safety, they have turned a blind eye to pedestrian safety, which has fallen since around 2009. Researchers looked at four main datasets in their investigation: crash test data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS) from 2016 to 2024; NHTSA’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS); vehicle measurement data from Expert AutoStats; and vehicle registration data from S&P Global from 2002 to 2024. The researchers concluded that the increased danger to pedestrians is caused by two main culprits.
First, large SUVs and trucks have taller hoods, raising the point of impact above most people’s center of gravity and pushing them to the ground, typically hard asphalt, rather than up and onto the hood, which is designed to absorb impacts. Second, with larger A-pillars designed to protect occupants in rollover crashes, modern cars tend to have larger blind spots than cars sold at the turn of the century (presuming the 21st century). The shift toward vehicles with taller hoods led to roughly 3000 deaths between 2016 and 2024. This number is conservative because it does not include crashes that take place in parking lots, driveways, or private roads, which aren’t part of the federal database.
The data also showed an estimated 2.8 percent increase in the odds of a pedestrian fatality for every one-inch increase in vehicle hood height. Between two different scenarios, one decreasing the hood height of every vehicle in the dataset by 3 inches, and the second using a random sampling of hood heights from 2002 across 10,000 simulated crashes, between 2624 (for scenario two) and 3077 (for scenario one) lives could have been saved from 2016 to 2024.
Preliminary position calls for designation under the Digital Markets Act
The European Commission has reached the preliminary position that Azure and AWS should be designated as gatekeepers under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
The gatekeeper designation would mean requirements imposed on the cloud giants, with fines of up to 10 percent of worldwide turnover if those requirements are not met.
Advertisement
According to the Commission, AWS and Azure, “the largest and second largest cloud computing services in the EU respectively,” are a gateway between businesses and their customers in the bloc.
“They both have vast and entrenched user bases and appear to benefit from lock-in effects and high switching costs, in addition to a large ecosystem.”
Although the cloud giants did not meet the DMA’s quantitative thresholds for designation (such as user numbers), their market positions have attracted scrutiny. Should the gatekeeper designations stick, obligations regarding interoperability, access to data, and competition would apply.
The view is preliminary at this stage, and Amazon and Microsoft have the opportunity to respond before anything becomes final.
Advertisement
A Microsoft spokesperson told The Register: “We continue to engage constructively with the Commission. The cloud sector in Europe is innovative, highly competitive and an accelerator for growth across the economy.”
The spokesperson added: “We remain concerned that ignoring the growing power of Google Cloud and Gemini will tilt the market in a harmful way.”
AWS also disagreed with the Commission’s preliminary position. A spokesperson told The Register: “The Commission’s preliminary findings disregard the breadth of cloud services available to European customers and risk deterring European investment and innovation. AWS faces healthy competition and customers across Europe have more choice, lower prices, and greater flexibility than ever before.
“The EU already has comprehensive cloud regulation through the Data Act, and adding another heavy layer of overlapping regulation under the DMA undermines European competitiveness and access to cutting-edge information technology. We will continue to engage with the Commission to reach the right outcome for customers and Europe’s digital future.”
Advertisement
Other parties responded more positively. A spokesperson for the Open Cloud Coalition told The Register: “Our members welcome the Commission’s preliminary finding naming Microsoft and AWS as cloud gatekeepers. We particularly note the finding that existing customer lock-in may fuel enterprise AI, a development that mirrors long-standing market concerns over Microsoft’s licensing and ecosystem practices.
“Moving quickly to deliver remedies is now a priority to ensure choice and growth for European cloud customers.”
In 2024, Microsoft described the Open Cloud Coalition as a lobbying group for Google.
Henna Virkkunen, executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, stated: “Cloud services have become a cornerstone of Europe’s economy – and a prerequisite for AI – with over half of EU businesses now relying on them, combined with record investment in public cloud infrastructure.
Advertisement
“Given their central role in Europe’s digital future, these services must operate in fair, open and competitive markets that foster trust and secure Europe’s tech sovereignty.”
Should the preliminary findings be confirmed and Microsoft and Amazon be designated as gatekeepers for their cloud services (they already have gatekeeper status for other services), the pair will have six months to ensure compliance with the DMA’s obligations. ®
Organizations continue to invest in phishing defenses, identity protection, and multi-factor authentication, yet account takeover attacks remain one of the most disruptive security incidents facing enterprises today.
On July 8, 2026, BleepingComputer will host a live webinar titled “Stop chasing alerts: Automating email security with behavioral AI” presented by Dan Nickolaisen, Solutions Architect Manager at Abnormal AI, and Eric Danneker, Director of Cyber Vigilance and Defense at Novant Health.
The webinar will examine how attackers gain access to legitimate accounts, why traditional security controls often struggle to detect account compromise quickly, and how behavioral AI can help security teams accelerate investigations and response.
Modern account takeover attacks frequently rely on trusted identities, legitimate cloud services, and compromised business accounts rather than obviously malicious activity. As a result, attackers can blend into normal business operations while maintaining access to email, collaboration platforms, and corporate resources.
Advertisement
Security teams are often left investigating suspicious messages, unusual login activity, and user reports long after attackers have established a foothold.
Abnormal AI helps organizations identify abnormal account behavior and automate investigation workflows, enabling analysts to detect compromised accounts faster and respond more efficiently.
Attendees will learn practical approaches for identifying account compromise earlier, reducing manual investigation work, and limiting the impact of account takeover attacks.
Compromised accounts are difficult to distinguish from legitimate users
Unlike traditional malware attacks, account takeover incidents often involve legitimate credentials, trusted devices, and normal business communications.
Advertisement
This makes compromised accounts significantly harder to identify using traditional security controls alone.
This webinar will explore how behavioral AI can help security teams identify unusual behavior patterns, investigate suspicious activity automatically, and accelerate remediation before attackers can expand their access.
The upcoming webinar will cover:
How phishing, BEC, and account takeover attacks lead to compromised business accounts
Why attackers increasingly rely on legitimate identities and trusted services
The challenges security teams face when investigating potential account compromise
How behavioral AI can automate detection, investigation, and remediation workflows
Practical techniques for reducing response times and limiting the impact of account takeovers
Join us to learn how organizations can detect compromised accounts faster and improve their ability to respond before small incidents become major security events.
TD’s plan to monitor some staff has exposed a legal gap: in much of Canada, an employer can watch you work and owes you little more than a notice.
Then Toronto-Dominion Bank told some of its staff that software would soon be watching how they worked, the employees did what most people do when handed that news.
They asked what exactly it would track, whether it could be used against them, and whether they had any say. The more uncomfortable answer, in much of Canada, is that the law gives them very little leverage to refuse.
The bank’s move, reported by Reuters in an exclusive earlier this month, applied to employees in its financial-crimes and risk-management functions.
Advertisement
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
They were told TD would deploy a tool called WorkiQ to track how they spent their time across web browsers, internal messaging, meeting apps, and other work software.
On the call, staff raised the obvious questions about privacy, about what the tool would capture, and about whether the data could feed into performance reviews.
Advertisement
TD described the deployment as “standard practice across the industry,” and said it uses automated tools in various parts of the business to improve insights and allocate resources.
There was a second, more striking element. According to an internal memo seen by Reuters, TD had initially planned to collect employees’ mouse movements, keystrokes, and other actions to use as training data for artificial intelligence, then scaled that back after weeks of pushback from staff.
The detail rhymes with what has been happening at Meta, which deployed a programme to capture keystrokes and mouse clicks on employee machines, also for AI training, and which paused the tool in June after a data-security scare.
The new frontier of workplace monitoring is not just measuring productivity. It is harvesting the way people work as raw material for models.
Advertisement
What makes the Canadian case distinct is the legal vacuum around it. The country’s federal privacy law, PIPEDA, does not apply to provincially regulated employers in provinces that lack their own substantially similar legislation, which includes Ontario, where much of the financial sector sits.
In those provinces, employee protection is assembled from a patchwork of employment-standards rules, common-law privacy torts, contracts, workplace policies, and, where they exist, collective agreements.
There is no single statute a worker can point to and say the surveillance crosses a line.
Ontario went furthest of any province, and even that is modest. Since October 2022, employers with 25 or more staff must have a written policy stating whether and how they electronically monitor employees.
Advertisement
The catch is in the wording. The law requires disclosure, not restraint. It compels an employer to tell workers what it is doing, but it does not give workers a new right to object, to limit the monitoring, or to keep the data out of a performance file. Telling someone they are being watched is not the same as protecting them.
The contrast with Europe is sharp. Under the EU’s data-protection regime, monitoring of the kind TD described runs into the principle of purpose limitation, the rule that data gathered for one reason cannot be quietly repurposed for another.
Repurposing employees’ everyday digital activity into AI training data is precisely the move that European rules are built to challenge. A Canadian worker in Ontario has no comparable instrument to reach for.
None of this makes TD an outlier. Employee monitoring spread quickly through the remote-work years, and banks, with their compliance obligations, have more reason than most to watch what staff do.
Advertisement
The tools have advanced faster than the rules meant to govern them, and in much of Canada the rules were never strong to begin with.
For the employees on that TD call, the answer to how much of their workday belongs to their employer is, for now, mostly up to the employer.
It feels like a different vehicle is getting recalled every other day — and it’s not even that much of an exaggeration. From 2017 to 2022, the United States averaged more than 1,000 recalls every year, based on data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The number of recalls has continued to climb, but it’s not because vehicles have become more dangerous or unreliable. According to ABC News, the rapid increase in car recalls is due to the complexity of modern vehicles.
There are more electronic components, features, and software in modern cars — and this means a higher chance of things going wrong. “Vehicles have advanced to a degree we’ve never seen before,” said Edmunds Auto Analyst Ivan Drury to ABC News. “It’s such a wide swathe of issues that recalls cover that you’re going to see this more and more.”
In other words, there are more failure points — not just because there are more components, but even the components themselves are more complex, taking more parts. Some recent examples include Ford recalling over 548,000 Expeditions over the center console’s chrome plating, Subaru recalling the new Forester due to its sunroof glass, and Mercedes-Benz recalling over 144,000 vehicles after customers noticed the digital instrument cluster glitching.
Advertisement
More recalls isn’t necessarily a bad thing
AS project/Shutterstock
There are so many recalls, it’s pretty difficult to keep track of it all — but not every recall is meant to alarm you. In fact, most are pretty minor. For example, Ford has gotten quite the reputation for its seemingly endless recalls — according to the NHTSA, it has the most recalled models out of every automaker, with 152 recalls in 2025 alone. Some would say Ford’s launches have quality issues, Ford itself has noted it’s just a way to improve quality. Despite its multiple recalls in 2026, Subaru is still considered one of the most reliable automakers.
Most recalls are considered minor rather than true safety concerns that require you to stop driving your car — although Ford’s Maverick and Bronco Sport have had those recently as well. Instead, automakers are just attempting to avoid issues by remaining within the NHTSA’s safety standards and regulations — which only benefits consumers.
Advertisement
“Recalls can be inconvenient, but they’re actually a good thing,” said Consumer Reports’ Jennifer Stockburger. “While they can vary in terms of severity, a recall means that a manufacturer will fix or take corrective action to address a safety issue, which is why they should be taken seriously.”
OPPO has started rolling out its June 2026 ColorOS 16 update, bringing a handful of new features to make everyday smartphone use a little more convenient. The update introduces a new Sports Widget for football fans, Bluetooth audio sharing, improved security alerts, and several quality-of-life additions across the system. The rollout is scheduled between June 1 and June 30 for eligible OPPO smartphones, such as the Find X9.
Live Sports Updates and Shared Audio
One of the biggest additions in this release is the new Sports Widget. Football fans can now follow live scores, match schedules, and tournament updates directly from their home screen without opening a dedicated app. ColorOS 16 also uses AI Suggestions to surface upcoming matches on the Home Screen and Shelf, making it easier to keep tabs on your favorite teams throughout the day.
Another useful addition is Audio Sharing, which allows a single OPPO phone to stream audio to two pairs of Bluetooth earphones simultaneously. Whether you’re watching a movie with a friend or listening to music together, both users can enjoy the same audio without relying on a speaker or wired splitter.
Security and Everyday Features Get Some Attention Too
The June update also introduces Accessibility Security Alerts. If an app from an unknown source receives Accessibility Service permissions, a permission commonly abused by malicious apps, ColorOS will immediately notify the user. This makes it easier to review or revoke suspicious permissions before they become a security risk.
OPPO has also refreshed the Weather app with Moon Rise and Moon Set timings, along with live Moon Phase information. While these additions may not appeal to everyone, they can be useful for outdoor enthusiasts, photographers, and anyone planning activities around natural lighting conditions.
Outdoor Mode has also received a small but practical upgrade. Users can now pin up to four frequently used apps for quicker access, while navigation and location awareness have also been improved for people who spend a lot of time outdoors.
Advertisement
Gaming and Personalization Improvements
Beyond the headline features, OPPO has added a few smaller quality-of-life improvements across the system. Users can now record gameplay more easily, while a new App Suggestions feature in the app drawer recommends frequently used apps based on usage patterns. The idea is to reduce the time spent searching for apps and make everyday navigation feel a little more intuitive.
OPPO says the June ColorOS 16 update will continue rolling out to eligible devices throughout the month.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login