Facepalm: Microsoft’s default Weather app in Windows 11 can use nearly 1.2 GB of RAM while sitting open on a forecast screen, according to testing by Windows Latest. The app doesn’t need to be actively used to reach that level of memory consumption. The report found that MSN Weather launches as many as nine Chromium-based subprocesses, suggesting the app is built around a web wrapper rather than as a fully native application. That design helps explain why a basic system utility can use so much memory.
MSN Weather is the standard weather app included with Windows 11. It provides a detailed set of tools, including live radar, hourly forecasts, wind and precipitation data, air-quality readings and moon phases. The data comes from several weather providers, with Foreca serving as a primary source.
The app’s interface is modern and works smoothly, but still, the level of resource use stands out when compared with Apple’s Weather app on macOS, which uses about 250 MB of RAM while providing similar forecast details. That is about five times the RAM usage for the built-in Windows alternative.
The Windows app also carries advertising. Windows Latest’s testing cited ads for Adobe Acrobat while others saw ads for LendingTree and Spotify. Microsoft may need to offset the cost of delivering weather data, but ads in a Microsoft-owned app remain a point of frustration for users who have already paid for a Windows license.
Advertisement
The report arrives as Microsoft has been talking more openly about Windows 11 performance. The company recently removed material recommending 32 GB of RAM for gaming PCs, and has said Windows 11 is optimized to run smoothly on systems with 8 GB of memory.
On an 8 GB machine, an app using close to 1.2 GB of RAM would take up roughly 15% of the system’s available memory. That is a significant share for an application users may open only to check the temperature or see whether rain is expected.
But it seems Microsoft has been building simple apps like this one using WebView2, the company’s framework for embedding web content inside Windows apps. It runs on the same Chromium engine that powers Microsoft Edge, splitting rendering, networking and GPU work into separate processes. That’s why Task Manager shows Weather behaving less like a single lightweight app and more like a small browser session running in the background.
Apple’s Weather app uses far fewer resources than MSN Weather.
Advertisement
Microsoft has said it plans to improve performance, reliability and memory use across Windows 11. It has also discussed updating the apps included with the operating system as it shifts from older Win32 and UWP approaches toward WinUI-based development.
It’s not clear whether that work will include MSN-branded services such as Weather and News. Those services are built into the Windows experience, but Microsoft hasn’t specifically said they’ll be part of the planned overhaul.
For now, the Weather app shows the gap between Microsoft’s broader optimization goals and the experience of using some Windows utilities today. The app is visually polished and offers plenty of forecast data, but its browser-based structure, high memory use and ads make it an awkward fit for a default desktop app.
You’ve seen fiber-reinforced-plastic before, no doubt, but perhaps never quite like in this video by [Whitburn Studio]: it’s still got the usual resin, but instead of glass or carbon fibers, he’s using printed Japanese cotton to create strong, lightweight and good looking parts for the interior of his RV– specifically the countertops.
The technique is very similar to the sort of moldless composite work Burt Rutan pioneered in aircraft use. The fiber-reinforced plastic is formed around a positive ‘buck’ that remains inside the final part, adding stiffness and some backing. Unlike Rutan’s designs, which used pure Styrofoam inside, [Whitburn] is using a sandwhich of two layers of thin ply (3.6 mm) with XPS foam in between. Adding plywood means you don’t need many layers of fiber– again, that’s a decorative cotton, here– to get a surface that won’t dent into the styrofoam when you drop a coffee cup on it.
Indeed, with the plywood providing much of the strength, he’s only using a single layer of cotton and a second of fiberglass– though the glass fibers are really there to protect the pretty print from oopsies while sanding, rather than for their mechanical properties, by the sounds of it. Everything is held together with clear epoxy resin, which also fills the weave of the fabrics. Multiple coats of that are required to get the smooth, shiny surface he shows off at the end, but all that sanding and buffing really pays off. That’s also where you have to be really careful to avoid oopsies– go through the cotton and you have to start over.
Aside from the aesthetics, since this is going in a vehicle the weight is an important consideration– the bigger of the two counters he makes, pictured here, weighs in at only 2.4 kg or 5.2 lb including the cutout covering the sink. That’s pretty good all things considered– a lot lighter than a cement countertop, or even one made of DIY resin tiles.
Even the best circular saws on the market are only as effective as their blades. As such, consistently getting ideal performance from your circular saw requires knowing when the blade needs to be sharpened or replaced. Learning about common problems with circular saw blades can also help you better determine how to potentially guard against such problems in the future.
What is the lifespan of a circular saw blade? Unfortunately, there’s no clear and universal answer to this question. Many factors can influence how long a circular saw’s blade lasts before it starts to deliver diminishing returns. These factors include the materials a blade is being used to cut, the blade’s manufacturer, whether an owner has prioritized maintenance, and even the technique and experience of an individual user.
In other words, a circular saw blade’s age may not tell you enough to help you confidently determine if you need a new one. Instead, you should monitor your saw and blade for red flags indicating the blade is no longer in top condition. If you’re new to using a circular saw, keep in mind that familiarizing yourself with circular saw beginner tips can also help you better understand how to use your saw in a way that maximizes the blade’s lifespan.
Advertisement
How to tell when you should replace your circular saw blade
Phoderstock/Shutterstock
Monitoring a blade’s performance is perhaps the best way to determine if a circular saw blade needs to be replaced, or at least sharpened. Common warning signs that a circular saw blade is no longer performing optimally include slower-than-normal cutting speeds, a blade creating more tears or chipping than it used to, and a blade leaving behind burn marks on the wood it’s cutting.
The signs of a circular saw blade that needs replacing can also depend on the specific type of blade. For instance, slower cutting is a red flag that any type of circular saw blade is in poor condition and may no longer serve its purpose. However, if you have a diamond-edged blade, you should also keep an eye out for signs like an overall smooth appearance. This indicates the diamonds are worn off.
Advertisement
A similar cosmetic warning sign is the presence of rust spots on a circular saw blade. Although the quality of a circular saw blade can vary from one manufacturer and model to another, it’s common for these blades to be rust-resistant. The presence of rust thus indicates the blade may be quite old.
Advertisement
Listen to what a circular saw blade tells you
Less Nick/Shutterstock
It can’t be reiterated enough: The warning signs of a circular saw blade that’s getting dull will typically be most apparent when you’re actually using the blade. For example, if you’re operating a circular saw properly, you shouldn’t encounter much resistance when cutting with it. Increased resistance is almost definitely a sign the blade has seen better days.
What you hear when operating your circular saw could also potentially be just as valuable as what you feel. When a circular saw blade no longer cuts as efficiently as it once did, the motor might need to work harder. This can result in the motor generating loud or unfamiliar noises.
Keep in mind that these warning signs don’t always indicate a blade needs to be completely replaced. You could try cleaning or sharpening a blade first before concluding a replacement is necessary. Just make sure you know how to do so safely. For more information on this topic, you can also brush up on basic circular saw safety tips.
30-billion parameter LLM, Meta’s first in more than a year, signals Meta’s return to the open weights arena. Open version of Muse Spark to follow
After seemingly abandoning its open source AI roots this spring, Meta offered enterprises a glimmer of hope on Monday with the launch of its first open weights model in more than a year.
Unveiled on Monday, Muse Glimmer is a 30 billion-parameter LLM distilled from the Social network’s larger, and for now proprietary, Muse Spark model.
Advertisement
Glimmer arrives as American tech companies grapple with a crisis over the proliferation of Chinese open weights models and a call for domestically-created alternatives.
Meta built its reputation on the back of open weights model development beginning with the Llama herd back in 2023. But after Llama 4 flopped and the company restructured its AI group, critics questioned CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s commitment to open source AI.
With Muse Glimmer, Meta has returned to the open weights arena. The company describes the model as being ideally suited to local AI inference workloads, including local agents, code assistants, and applications requiring robust multi-modal tool use and function calling.
Released under a highly permissive Apache 2.0 license, enterprises are also free to deploy, use, and modify the model however they see fit. We imagine it won’t be long before Nous Research — one of the original Llama fine-tuners — emits another Hermes model based on Glimmer.
Advertisement
Early support has begun to hit popular local AI inference platforms like Llama.cpp, Ollama, and Unsloth, with optimized implementations expected to hit over the next few weeks.
But at 30 billion parameters, Muse Glimmer doesn’t exactly move the needle much on reclaiming American open weights superiority. It’s too small to compete with Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3, Alibaba’s Qwen 3.8-Max, DeepSeek V4 Flash, or any of the other Chinese models which have dominated the AI news cycle over the past few months.
Instead, Muse Glimmer is positioned as a model for small-to-medium sized enterprises or enthusiasts, competing with similarly-sized LLMs from Alibaba and Google. This is reflected in Meta’s benchmark figures, which pit the model against Alibaba’s Qwen 3.6-27B and Google Gemma 4 31B.
As usual, take these claims with a grain of salt, but Glimmer does appear to best Google’s Gemma in most scenarios, and trades blows with Alibaba’s equivalently sized model.
Advertisement
Meta’s Muse Glimmer bests Google’s comparably sized Gemma 4 model, and trades blows with Alibaba’s own 27B Qwen 3.6 model.
Unfortunately for Meta, the comparison probably won’t age well, with Qwen 3.8-27B due to be released any day now.
Open and local
Glimmer’s relatively small parameter count means that its hardware requirements are rather modest compared to larger frontier-class models, like DeepSeek V4. At its native BF16 precision, the model should fit comfortably into a single Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 or AMD MI350P.
Quantized to 4-bit precision and model’s weights shrink from around 60 GB to just under 16 GB — small enough to fit in a 20 to 24 GB consumer graphics card, like an RTX 30/4090 or RX 7900 XT/XTX. Unfortunately for those with 16 GB cards, a lack of adequate working memory means dropping down to a smaller, less accurate 3-bit quant.
Even if you can get the model to fit, it won’t be as fast as some other recent models, like Qwen 3.6-35B-A3B or Gemma 4 26B-A4B, as Glimmer uses all 30 billion parameters to generate each token where the others use just 3 to 4 billion.
Advertisement
Glimmer benefits heavily from memory bandwidth. On cards like the RTX 5090, which has 1.8 TB/s of it, Meta says users can expect between 75 and 233 tok/s. The higher end of that relies on a technique called speculative decoding.
As a quick refresher, speculative decoding uses a small draft model, in this case one modeled after DeepSeek’s DSpark drafter, to speed up inference by predicting the outputs of a larger model. If you’re interested, we explore the concept in greater depth in this hands-on here.
While 233 tok/s is plenty fast for most agentic workloads, most users won’t see performance nearly that high. On an M5 Max MacBook Pro, Meta estimates that the systems’ up to 614 GB/s of bandwidth will deliver a still-meaningful 26.2 to 57.8 tok/s, but it’s also worth pointing out the M5 Max delivers 4x the memory bandwidth of the typical Windows notebook today.
In other words, unless you’ve got a dedicated graphics card with enough memory to run the model, the best you can expect is around 6 to 14 tok/s. Testing on a DGX Spark in Unsloth Studio, we were getting around 12.2 tok/s, though DSpark support doesn’t appear to have been implemented just yet.
Advertisement
If you’d like to try the model out for yourself, its weights are currently available for download on Hugging Face as well as through local inference platforms like Ollama and LM Studio.
Sparking joy
Meta’s return to the open weights arena doesn’t stop with Glimmer. In an X post Monday, Meta’s Superintelligence chief Alexandr Wang committed to releasing an open weights version of Muse Spark 1.2 “soon.”
Muse Spark 1.2 is Meta’s most capable model, its first to compete in a meaningful way with rivals OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. However, even this release won’t close the gap with Chinese models.
Both Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8-Max outperform Spark, according to Artificial Analysis’ intelligence index. Having said that, we still don’t know how big Spark actually is. If Meta’s next open weights model ends up delivering similar performance using fewer weights, this may end up being more competitive from a cost per token standpoint. ®
In brief: GeForce Now is a cloud gaming service that lets users stream games over the internet in limited sessions. As a pair of modders recently discovered, however, a bit of tinkering can turn it into a formidable system for offloading demanding computing tasks.
GeForce Now can apparently do much more than simply stream a selection of supported games using the AV1 codec. Two modders known as “Zortos” and “dpadGuy” have uncovered a trick to gain full desktop access to the streaming service, allowing them to run custom games and software directly on Nvidia’s hardware. Granted, Nvidia will probably patch this loophole eventually, but in the meantime the workaround remains fully functional for anyone willing to follow the modders’ steps.
The modders explained how they achieved this unprecedented result in a video tutorial. The clip essentially provides a step-by-step guide on how to access the remote desktop, although they warn that the method only works with a paid GeForce Now subscription. Free-tier users and GeForce Now Alliance Partner services remain limited to AV1 game streaming.
Advertisement
The tutorial is based on the free-to-play game Trove and GeForce Now’s ability to expose the Steam client’s full interface. From within the current Steam session, users need to access the client’s browser and locate a specific executable file in Trove’s installation folder. They then need to replace the file with a special version provided by the modders and launch it to finally access the remote desktop.
GeForce Now machines can provide some hefty hardware specifications. Zortos said he was able to access an “Ultimate”-tier machine equipped with an AMD Epyc 9375F 32-core CPU and a GeForce RTX 5080 GPU. The system has 48GB of VRAM and 56GB of total system RAM.
The tutorial demonstrates how the newly discovered desktop access could be used to install Wallpaper Engine from Steam or customize the Windows taskbar. More generally, it could provide broader access to Nvidia’s hardware resources, raising significant security and trust concerns. Later, Zortos used the powerful remote machines to install custom AI models, promising that more “juicy” demonstrations are on the way.
It’s worth noting that this kind of access sits well outside GeForce Now’s terms of service, so anyone attempting this risks having their account suspended or banned.
Advertisement
In any case, the Trove-based method for breaking into Nvidia’s cloud gaming service does not appear to be foolproof. Some users who tried the same trick experienced a few unexpected issues, including Windows sessions closing automatically or being unable to download the custom executable file to Trove’s folder. Some said the Trove method no longer works, although Zortos reiterated that this is not the case.
A routine security assessment found that cameras aboard Royal Navy Kraken unmanned surface vessels were sending “heartbeat” signals to an IP address in China. “A thorough investigation found no evidence of MoD data or systems being accessed, compromised or transmitted externally,” said a Ministry of Defense spokesperson. “Our assurance and testing processes are designed to identify and address potential vulnerabilities early, and we continue to undertake routine security activity across our systems and equipment.” The Register reports: According to reports, the talkative components were cameras sourced by Kraken from a third-party supplier. The incident raises questions about supply chains, audits, and cybersecurity in the British armed forces. The spokesperson said: “The first duty of government is national security, and we take the security of our equipment, networks, and data extremely seriously.”
Hackers used a dedicated mobile gateway to compromise a second facility during the destructive cyberattacks that hit Poland’s energy sector last year.
The second target was a small combined heat-and-power (CHP) plant that supplies heat to around 50,000 residents, resulting in the steam turbine and the water treatment system being shut down.
The Polish Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) disclosed this second incident in a follow-up report over the weekend, saying that the attacker used a private Access Point Name (APN) to access the operational technology network.
“The attack was made possible, among other factors, by a misconfiguration that allowed arbitrary devices within the private APN network to communicate with one another.”
On December 29, 2025, an attacker believed to be linked to the Russian Electrum threat group targeted 30 wind and solar power installations and a large CHP plant in Poland, destroying key equipment beyond repair.
Advertisement
The threat actor hit distributed energy resource (DER) sites across the country, disabled communications equipment, corrupted operational technology (OT) devices, and wiped Windows systems. Despite this effort to destabilize the grid, energy generation and distribution were not disrupted.
In the newly disclosed attack at a second, smaller CHP plant, the threat actor switched off the programmable logic controllers (PLC) and protected access with a password, thus deactivating a steam turbine and the plant’s process-water treatment system and interrupting cogeneration operations.
The staff at the plant managed to restore impacted systems quickly, so the outage was short-lived and had no impact on the population.
Novel attack path
Upon investigating the incident, the Polish CERT determined that the attacker initially compromised a FortiGate VPN/firewall at a wind farm and used a Teltonika cellular router on its network to tunnel into a private APN managed by the distribution system operator.
Advertisement
The APN lacked client isolation, allowing the attacker to scan for and communicate with devices at other facilities.
Beginning on December 18, the attacker found a WAGO PFC200 PLC at the CHP plant whose web interface was exposed on the APN and protected with default administrator credentials.
After compromising the controller, the attacker enabled SSH and used it as a bridge into the plant’s OT network.
Over the following week, they scanned the network for SCADA systems and industrial devices, and on December 25 they connected to three Siemens PLCs, likely in preparation for the attack.
Advertisement
At approximately 5:30 a.m. on December 29, the attacker accessed the SCADA interface and Siemens PLCs, switching them into STOP mode, activating password protection, and shutting down the steam turbine and process-water treatment system.
Complete attack path Source: CERT Polska
The attacker also reset and reconfigured several Moxa devices to impede recovery, destroyed logs, and hindered forensic analysis by corrupting or resetting the WAGO controller, Teltonika router, and FortiGate firewall used throughout the intrusion.
The Polish CERT believes this to be the first known real-world cyberattack in which an attacker entered an OT network by moving laterally through a private APN.
“To the best of our knowledge, the incident described in this report, which involved gaining access to an OT network through a private APN, was the first observed instance of this attack vector being used in a real-world cyberattack,” commented CERT Polska.
The surveys that followed the investigation determined that this configuration was common in Poland at the time, and the country’s CERT estimates that it’s likely similar arrangements are widely used internationally.
Advertisement
It is recommended to treat private APNs as untrusted external networks, enable isolation between connected clients, use allowlists for essential traffic between APN gateways and OT systems, and disable exposed SSH and Telnet administration services.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Sounding off: Microsoft’s push to bake AI into every product and service it sells is understandably facing some backlash. Even Office is turning into a vessel for Redmond’s chatbots, which may be why one developer decided to go back in time instead, releasing a wild modern port of an early Word release.
Developer Justin Marshall recently ported Word for Windows 1.1a to modern Windows systems. The open-source conversion draws on the source code of the original program, which Microsoft shared with the community in 2014.
Marshall’s port brings the original WfW experience to Windows x64, replacing non-working 16-bit code with modern programming conventions. The coder explains there’s no emulation, virtualization, or reimplementation trick involved: the original Word application runs with its original resources and UI elements intact.
Porting WfW to Windows x64 wasn’t exactly a “plug-and-play” affair. Marshall said that while the original C code and resource files are still part of the port, he had to make the 16-bit code behave properly in a modern 64-bit Windows environment. Specific behaviors tied to the Win16 API had to be adapted to modern Win32 APIs, while dialogs, cursors, and bitmap elements had to be rebuilt with native host tools through the CMake build process.
Advertisement
“CMake inventories the legacy assembly tree but does not compile those modules into native targets. This keeps the historical implementation available as a reference while ensuring all shipped code is valid for AMD64,” Marshall explained on the project’s GitHub page.
Word, and Word for Windows 1.1a specifically, hold a special place in Microsoft’s software history. The original Word for Windows debuted in 1989, bringing the DOS-based productivity tool to a new GUI paradigm; version 1.1a followed a year later as the release that added dedicated support for Windows 3.0. Over time, Word became the de facto standard for word processing in lieu of WordPerfect.
Compared to the barebones GUI of Word for Windows 1.1a, today’s Word is a completely different beast. Microsoft now treats its productivity software largely as a means of promoting its AI services. Thanks to chatbots and LLMs, the latest Microsoft 365 version of Word can even write documents and expand drafts on its own. No pesky human intelligence required.
While Microsoft keeps cramming more AI into Office, some developers are trying to fight back by returning to the roots of its software tools. Before the WfW port, Marshall built other projects blending old software with modern tech, including a ray-tracing port of Quake 1 and a merge of the Quake 4 SDK with the Doom 3 graphics engine, among others.
The Mcon controller balances portability and performance in a compact, MagSafe-compatible design for iPhone gamers.
Gaming controllers usually come in two flavors. You’ll find ones that are extremely comfortable and capable, as well as those that are small and portable.
Finding a controller that is both portable and capable is a rarity, to say the least. The OhSnap Mcon is the first one I’ve tested that makes good choices on compromises and uses MagSafe for easy connection to iPhone.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: Design
Mcon has a very cool design. It’s roughly the size of my iPhone 17 Pro, but a bit thicker.
Advertisement
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: It’s fun to open the Mcon controller
It connects to your iPhone with MagSafe and has a solid hold. When you’re ready to game, you just press the silver button that sits right where your fingers rest.
When the button is pressed, the controller springs open. The Bluetooth is turned on, and the iPhone gets positioned just above the controller buttons.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: The grips fold flat to the controller
Advertisement
It’s just fun to do and has a satisfying whoosh and click. I also appreciate that the phone doesn’t just slide forward; it angles upward slightly to make it more comfortable.
With the controller open, you can then rotate out two extra palm grips from around the back. This puts you in a natural gaming position with access to the joysticks, triggers, and all the other buttons.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: The buttons use XYAB labels
Speaking of the buttons, they’re in a bit of an interesting layout. It’s like a combination of a PlayStation controller and an Xbox controller.
Advertisement
It uses the XYAB buttons that Xbox uses, but it uses dual, center-justified joysticks as PlayStation does. The button labels are mostly irrelevant, and I vastly prefer this joystick setup to the Xbox’s.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: The top comes off to use as a stand
Those joysticks use what OhSnap calls MagRes technology that promises to be ultra-accurate, lag-free, and drift-free. OhSnap even claims it is superior to the well-respected Hall-effect mechanics.
You can use the controller via Bluetooth, or you can use it wired via USB-C. If you go wireless, you can enter “kickback mode” by pressing the eject button and removing the MagSafe module.
Advertisement
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: It’s easy to reassemble and snaps into place
This gives you a magnetic stand for your phone that you can place anywhere you want and then relax with the wireless controller. It’s very clever how the metal arm that works as the stand also doubles as the central guide and stabilizer as it opens and closes.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: Gaming performance
I wouldn’t consider myself a professional gamer by any means, but I’m certainly an avid one. I’ve long been a proponent of more console-level games making their way to iPhone, iPad, and Mac.
Quickly after launch, I eagerly downloaded Assassin’s Creed Mirage, Hitman World of Assassination, and Red Dead Redemption. Not to mention many more mobile-specific games like PowerWash Simulator, Thronefall, Call of Duty Mobile, or Alto’s Odyssey.
Advertisement
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: Playing Hit Man on iPhone with the Mcon controller
I tested the Mcon controller with most of these games over the course of the last several weeks. While it wasn’t perfect, it’s very reliable to use.
All of the buttons were incredibly tactile, providing a solid click each time they are pressed. The bumpers and triggers also felt reliable, though they were skinny, leaving my finger feeling a bit unsupported.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: The joysticks are very accurate and responsive
Advertisement
To me, the joysticks are the most important control, and OhSnap did a great job with these ones. They’re absolutely on the small side, but there was basically no dead zone in the middle, and they were very reactive when using them.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: The bumper and trigger buttons feel good, but are somewhat thin
I think all of these buttons are premium in design and performance, but are slightly smaller to accommodate the portable footprint.
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: Should you buy it?
With mobile gaming being as popular as it is, there is no shortage of controllers on the market. We’ve reviewed several here at AppleInsider.
Advertisement
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: There are lots of controllers out there, but none as compact and premium
For standalone controllers, I’m still the biggest fan of the DualSense controller that is MFi certified and even has a streamlined pairing process with iOS 26. The Razer Kishi Ultra is also an excellent option.
Both of them are inarguably more comfortable than the Mcon is. They fit your hand better, and the buttons are bigger.
Neither of those, nor the equally popular Backbone, will fit in your pocket, though. That portability is ultimately what matters most with the Mcon.
Advertisement
Mcon mobile gaming controller review: You can play the Mcon controller anywhere
You can find more comfortable controllers, but you’d be hard-pressed to find a portable one that is as solid as this one is.
Anyone who grew up or was already driving in the 1990s remembers the era of the jellybean car — all smooth lines and soft curves. Today, many modern vehicles, even bulky SUVs, are still mostly comprised of sleek lines. It’s a dramatic shift from the 1970s and 1980s, when most automakers used flat panels and straight lines, producing vehicles that more closely resembled a cardboard box than the aerodynamic designs we see on the road today. You may have noticed another shift in recent years, however, as some automakers are bringing back those boxy blueprints.
SUVs trace their lineage back to the Willys Jeep that was used during World War II. The earliest SUVs mimicked this design, which was easy to manufacture, and offered lots of interior space for families to spread out and carry luggage or cargo. By the 1960s, other manufacturers had joined Jeep with their own boxy SUVs, and the style remained popular until the late 1990s. SUVs soared in popularity, and designs trended to more car-like lines. Stricter rules regarding fuel efficiency also helped soften lines for more aerodynamic designs.
Car design, like almost everything else, however, is cyclical, and boxy SUVs are making a comeback. Modern engineering and advances in engine design mean that those straight lines don’t have as much effect on fuel efficiency as they did in the past, and many Americans are hungering for retro designs in everything from cameras to cars. Here are five car brands that make boxy SUVs engineered for the modern buyer.
Advertisement
Ford
Ford is one the most iconic automakers in American history, so it stands to reason that it has produced vehicles of every shape and size over its more than 100-year history, and one of its most legendary models is the Bronco. First introduced in 1966, the Bronco was designed as an all-purpose vehicle that could easily take you off the road and go head-to-head with vehicles like the Jeep CJ. Ford ended production on the Bronco in 1996, but reintroduced the model with a retro vibe, including the boxy exterior that so many loved, in 2021.
Advertisement
Now a competitor to the Jeep Wrangler, the Bronco’s shape isn’t just an homage to a well-loved vehicle. Those straight lines and the flat hood make it easier for drivers to see where they are on a rocky path or muddy trail. The 2026 model starts at $40,795, and offers a four-cylinder engine and standard four-wheel drive. Buyers can opt for either a two-door or a four-door model.
Ford also sells the Bronco Sport, a more refined option that still offers that retro-inspired, rugged design. It has a lower starting price of $31,845 but comes with standard four-wheel drive. Unlike both the two-door and four-door models of the Bronco, the doors on the Bronco Sport are not removable.
Advertisement
Hyundai Santa Fe
When Hyundai debuted the fully redesigned 2024 Santa Fe, some enthusiasts were shocked at its transformation. The smooth, flowing lines of its predecessor were nowhere to be seen, replaced by a new boxy design that is reminiscent of days long past. The change wasn’t for simple aesthetics, however. Automakers try to stay ahead of emerging trends when it comes to design, hoping to satisfy buyers when these vehicles hit the sales lot.
The Santa Fe’s boxy look is geared toward outdoor enthusiasts, offering more interior space along with a wide tailgate opening that allows for easy loading and access to cargo. Tail lights are positioned low on the vehicle to enhance that wide space for even better accessibility.
Despite the boxy look, Hyundai carefully designed the Santa Fe to maximize aerodynamics, and it has excellent fuel economy. This three-row SUV also has a lower starting price than many competitors, with the base SE trim available for $36,650 including destination.
Advertisement
Other Hyundai models retain the flowing lines many modern consumers expect, but the Santa Fe isn’t the automaker’s only angular SUV. Its much smaller cousin, the Venue, also has a compact, boxy design to maximize interior space, while the fully electric IONIQ 9 offers a structured look. The Venue starts at $20,550, while the IONIQ 9 has an MSRP of $58,955, showcasing Hyundai’s commitment to providing thoughtfully-designed vehicles at different price points.
Advertisement
Jeep
Jeep has a long history of boxy SUVs, all the way back to the pioneering Willys, but it’s also produced many rounded, sleek models as well. Today, the Wrangler and the brand new Recon are Jeep’s most angular vehicles. The Recon is fully electric and trail-rated, with 650 horsepower and enough torque to easily get you up a rocky path. It’s more than a typical electric SUV, however.
The Recon has removable doors, removable rear-quarter glass, removable swing gate glass, and an available power-folding roof that opens with the touch of a button. The Recon’s retro look isn’t just rugged and cool, it also gives buyers a ton of interior cargo space. This new model has a starting price of $66,995.
Jeep’s iconic Wrangler has always had a boxy shape, even as both consumer preference and technology changed over the years. The 2026 Wrangler is no different. Starting at $36,035, the Wrangler’s shape is intrinsically tied with its history and utility. This much beloved vehicle is made for off-roading fun, and the outcry would likely be enormous if Jeep ever changed its basic design.
The large Grand Wagoneer, priced at $63,995, also has an angular silhouette. The design is a nod to the original Jeep Wagoneer, which was launched in the 1960s. The straight sides and flat roof offer plenty of room for your family to stretch out over three rows of seats.
Advertisement
Mercedes-Benz
DiPres/Shutterstock
Many words come to mind when you think of Mercedes-Benz. Luxurious, timeless, and high-performing, most Mercedes models have smooth, aerodynamic bodies with flowing rooflines. The G-Class is the exception to the rule. Nicknamed the G-Wagon, this SUV has been produced continuously since it first debuted in 1979, and Mercedes never smoothed out those iconic sharp corners.
The automaker originally partnered with an Austrian military vehicle manufacturer called Steyr-Daimler-Puch to design the Geländewagen for both military and civilian use. These roots are still evident in the vehicle’s ladder-frame chassis, tailgated-mounted spare tire, and rugged design. With a starting price of almost $200,000, however, the latest G63 AMG goes beyond your typical off-roading vehicle. It’s highly-capable on the trail, but it can also go from 0 to 60 mph in about four seconds, thanks to a 577 hp twin-turbo V8.
Advertisement
Inside, buyers will find leather seats available in a wide array of patterns and colors, a premium sound system, two 12.3-inch screens under a single pane of glass, and other truly cool features. There’s more than 37 cubic feet of cargo space and a side-hinged tailgate that looks great, but it might be cumbersome at times. Most of Mercedes-Benz’s other vehicles have a more streamlined design, even its wagons, but some of the more affordable SUVs like the GLB and the EQB offer harder edges that lend themselves to more cargo space.
Advertisement
Toyota
The Land Cruiser has been one of Toyota’s boxier SUVs since its launch in the 1950s, but there’s no denying that the automaker softened its lines in the late 1990s and into the 2000s. After discontinuing the model in 2021, the Land Cruiser made a triumphant return in 2024 with a look that harkens back to its original, boxy appearance.
The current model offers only two rows instead of three like its predecessor, and it offers ample cargo space. The retro touches are everywhere, from the TOYOTA heritage grille to the round headlights found on the base “1958” trim. Of course, it’s a different story when it comes to tech and safety features, and there’s also a modern hybrid powertrain with 326 hp and better-than-average fuel economy. It also boasts full-time four-wheel drive and three drive modes. Prices start at $59,675 including destination.
In addition to the Land Cruiser, several of Toyota’s other SUVs have boxy, rugged designs. The massive Sequoia has strong, muscular lines that maximize cabin space for both passengers and cargo. Nothing is small about the Sequoia, which starts at a much higher $67,920 including destination. The rugged, midsize 4Runner is designed to be as capable off-road as it is on the highway, and its square shape gives drivers a clearer line of sight, especially on the trail. The 2026 model starts at $43,865 including destination. Even the popular RAV4 is relatively boxy, with a squared-off roofline and fender arches that give it a distinctly Toyota off-roader shape.
Franklin project adds new security providers, employs digital twins and AI
DEF CON hackers expanded their efforts to provide free cyber-defenses to rural water systems in the US to include managed detection and response providers, digital twins, and AI agents.
On Friday, at the annual hacker’s conference, DEF CON Franklin and the National Rural Water Association (NRWA) announced a new program called the Water Watch Center. It will initially fund five providers – Defendify, Legato Security, L1 Secure, Rapid7, and Sentinel Technologies – to help small water utilities serving fewer than 10,000 people detect and mitigate breaches.
Advertisement
The security providers will exchange threat info and share that with the NRWA, which provides technical assistance and operational support to small water and wastewater utilities across all 50 states.
“We’ve had our volunteer experts out for two years in these water utilities, in the trenches with these folks, and the thing that we’ve realized is that there’s just not a scalable delivery mechanism for cyber for these utilities when there’s 150,000 of them, and 98 percent of them are small businesses,” Jake Braun told The Register during an interview at DEF CON.
We’ve had our volunteer experts out for two years in these water utilities, in the trenches with these folks, and the thing that we’ve realized is that there’s just not a scalable delivery mechanism for cyber for these utilities when there’s 150,000 of them
Advertisement
“We groped around in the dark for what to do, and eventually realized we already know how to do security for small businesses – it’s MSSPs,” Braun said. “So why don’t we just do that?”
He described the new Water Watch Center as a pyramid, with the NRWA at the top, the managed detection and response providers’ sensors hunting for security vulnerabilities across the utilities’ networks, and then Franklin volunteers fixing issues or responding to instructions as needed.
“We have five initial MSSPs, which will expand to 10 eventually, based on the 10 CISA regions,” Braun said. “And then below that, we have volunteers who can help, and connect water utilities to MSSPs, so we’re not just sending alerts. We can take the alerts that CISA and the ISAC put out, and deliver cybersecurity. That’s been the missing piece: there has been no delivery mechanism for cybersecurity that’s scalable nationally – that’s what this is.”
Suspected Iranian hackers have hit numerous water systems in recent weeks, and most were small, community systems that left programmable logic controllers directly exposed to the internet using default or weak passwords. There’s no indication that the attackers used AI to help plan or carry out these digital disruptions. However, as both cyber and national security experts told The Register during conversations on the sidelines of Black Hat and DEF CON, it’s only a matter of time until that happens.
Advertisement
DEF CON Franklin has a plan for that scenario, too.
The Water Watch Center also partnered with Vanderbilt University to apply research from the DARPA Cyber Agents for Security Testing and Learning Environment (CASTLE) program. This partnership will create digital twins for a few WWC water and wastewater system environments, and then researchers will deploy both red- and blue-team agents across these digital dupes.
The red-team attack agents try to hack the water systems, testing the blue-team defenders’ automated detection and response capabilities, with the eventual goal of deploying AI-based defense to water and wastewater facilities across the US.
“They let it fight each other a gazillion times, and then they figure out when does the blue team win, so we can train agents to then later drop into these 150,000 water utilities,” Braun said.
Advertisement
“There’s already a 500,000-person shortage of cyber professionals. The idea that we’re magically going to find 150,000 new people is a fantasy. There is no other way to really be able to combat the AI attacks that are going to be coming at these things.” ®
You must be logged in to post a comment Login