Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

ONIX Zenith XMT20 Streamer Transport Debuts With TIDAL Connect, Qobuz Connect, and Roon Ready Certification

Published

on

Shanling is pushing deeper into serious digital front-end territory with the ONIX Zenith XMT20 streamer transport, the company’s first product built around its newly developed Linux-based streaming platform. Priced at $2,199 USD internationally and €2,399 in the European Union (North American pricing is still TBD), the ONIX Zenith XMT20 is clearly aimed at listeners who want a dedicated, high-end digital source without the clutter or compromises of an all-in-one solution.

The new platform is designed around faster, simpler operation, with a heavy emphasis on remote control and native support for TIDAL Connect, Qobuz Connect, and full Roon Ready certification.

The XMT20 also underscores how tight the relationship between ONIX and Shanling has become. Following a string of recent collaborations, including the XST20 SACD/CD transport, the two brands are clearly aligning their engineering and design efforts across both disc-based and network audio.

shanling-onix-zenith-xmt20-music-streamer-rear

Beyond streaming, the XMT20 supports gapless local playback via USB storage or an internal SSD slot, handles all common Hi-Res formats, and uses the Eddict Controller app for Android and iOS. DLNA and AirPlay 2 round out the feature set, making the XMT20 a flexible but purpose-built transport rather than a lifestyle streamer trying to be everything at once.

High-End Grade Digital Output

The ONIX XMT20 is built to function as a true reference-grade digital transport, offering six digital outputs to accommodate virtually any external DAC. Standard coaxial, optical, BNC, and AES/EBU connections are joined by an advanced USB output and a dedicated I²S interface, making the XMT20 far more flexible than a typical network streamer. The FPGA-assisted I²S output is a key differentiator, providing 10 preconfigured pinout options to ensure broad compatibility with most I²S-capable DACs on the market—no guesswork, no adapters, no excuses.

Advertisement

Digital signal integrity is handled with the same seriousness ONIX applies to its disc transports. A pair of KDS high-precision crystal oscillators anchors the clocking architecture, delivering low-jitter performance intended for high-resolution playback across all supported outputs. In practical terms, the design philosophy mirrors what made the ONIX XST20 such a compelling SACD/CD transport: clean signal paths, stable timing, and an emphasis on musical coherence rather than feature bloat. The XMT20 takes that same approach and applies it squarely to modern network and file-based digital playback.

shanling-onix-zenith-xst20-xmt20-xda20
Shanling ONIX Zenith XST20 SACD/CD Transport, XMT20 Streamer, XDA20 DAC-AMP

Adapted for CD Playback & Ripping

The ONIX Zenith XMT20 doesn’t stop at streaming and file playback. It also introduces a new CD playback and ripping system, extending the unit’s role as a central digital hub. The platform supports both basic USB CD drives and the more advanced Shanling CR60, giving users the choice between simple disc access or a higher-grade external transport. CDs can be played directly through the XMT20 or securely ripped to an internal SSD or connected USB storage.

Ripping is handled with minimal friction. The system supports automatic metadata tagging and album art downloads, all managed through the Eddict Controller app, keeping the process streamlined and hands-off once initiated. In practice, this brings the same disciplined, transport-first mindset ONIX applies to disc playback into the file-based world—letting users preserve their CD collections digitally without resorting to a computer-based workflow or third-party software.

shanling-onix-zenith-xmt20-music-streamer-remote

Key Specifications

  • Dimensions / Weight: 32 x 24 x 7.2 cm / 5.2 kg
  • Display: 3.4-inch touch screen
  • Platform: In-house Linux-based streaming system
  • Streaming Support: TIDAL Connect, Qobuz Connect, Roon Ready
  • Networking: Wi-Fi, Ethernet, DLNA, AirPlay 2, NAS
  • Local Playback:
    • USB storage (rear port, up to 2TB)
    • M.2 NVMe SSD slot (bottom-mounted)
  • File Support:
    DSD (.iso, .dsf, .dff), DXD, FLAC, WAV, AIFF, APE, ALAC, AAC, MP3, OGG, M3U/M3U8 (DST not supported)
  • CD Playback / Ripping:
    USB CD drives and Shanling CR60
  • Digital Outputs:
    • Optical, Coaxial, BNC, AES/EBU: PCM 24/192, DSD64 (DoP)
    • USB & I²S: PCM 24/768, DSD512 (native)
  • Power Supply: 25VA Talema transformer
shanling-onix-zenith-xmt20-music-streamer-angle

The Bottom Line

The ONIX XMT20 is not trying to be a mass-market streamer, and that’s exactly the point. What makes it unique is its transport-first design: a new in-house Linux platform built around native TIDAL Connect, Qobuz Connect, and full Roon Ready certification, combined with an unusually deep set of high-end digital outputs, including FPGA-assisted I²S with broad DAC compatibility. Add local playback from USB or internal NVMe SSD, plus CD playback and ripping via external drives, and the XMT20 becomes a modern digital hub that treats signal integrity and flexibility as priorities rather than afterthoughts.

Based on €2,399 EU pricing and $2,199 international pricing, it is highly unlikely the North American price will land under $2,000 USD; a figure closer to $2,400 is far more realistic. There is also no Spotify Connect support, which immediately narrows the audience—and intentionally so. The XMT20 is for Roon-centric listeners, Qobuz and TIDAL subscribers, and DAC owners who want a serious, future-proof digital transport without paying for an internal DAC they don’t need. If you’re building a high-end system around external conversion and care more about clocking, output options, and control than app ecosystems or lifestyle features, the XMT20 is very much aimed at you.

For more information: XMT20 Streamer

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

New ‘Vibe Coded’ AI Translation Tool Splits the Video Game Preservation Community

Published

on

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Since Andrej Karpathy coined the term “vibe coding” just over a year ago, we’ve seen a rapid increase in both the capabilities and popularity of using AI models to throw together quick programming projects with less human time and effort than ever before. One such vibe-coded project, Gaming Alexandria Researcher, launched over the weekend as what coder Dustin Hubbard called an effort to help organize the hundreds of scanned Japanese gaming magazines he’s helped maintain at clearinghouse Gaming Alexandria over the years, alongside machine translations of their OCR text.

A day after that project went public, though, Hubbard was issuing an apology to many members of the Gaming Alexandria community who loudly objected to the use of Patreon funds for an error-prone AI-powered translation effort. The hubbub highlights just how controversial AI tools remain for many online communities, even as many see them as ways to maximize limited funds and man-hours. “I sincerely apologize,” Hubbard wrote in his apology post. “My entire preservation philosophy has been to get people access to things we’ve never had access to before. I felt this project was a good step towards that, but I should have taken more into consideration the issues with AI.” “I’m very, very disappointed to see [Gaming Alexandria], one of the foremost organizations for preserving game history, promoting the use of AI translation and using Patreon funds to pay for AI licenses,” game designer and Legend of Zelda historian Max Nichols wrote in a post on Bluesky over the weekend. “I have cancelled my Patreon membership and will no longer promote the organization.”

Nichols later deleted his original message (archived here), saying he was “uncomfortable with the scale of reposts and anger” it had generated in the community. However, he maintained his core criticism: that Gemini-generated translations inevitably introduce inaccuracies that make them unreliable for scholarly use.

In a follow-up, he also objected to Patreon funds being used to pay for AI tools that produce what he called “untrustworthy” translations, arguing they distort history and are not valid sources for research. “… It’s worthless and destructive: these translations are like looking at history through a clownhouse mirror,” he added.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Denon DP-500BT Bluetooth Turntable Streams Vinyl Wirelessly to Speakers and Headphones

Published

on

Denon has introduced the DP-500BT Bluetooth turntable, a semi-automatic belt-drive model designed to bring vinyl playback into wireless listening systems. The new turntable allows records to be played through traditional analog outputs or streamed directly to Bluetooth speakers and headphones, offering a flexible option for listeners who want the warmth of vinyl without giving up modern convenience.

Vinyl’s resurgence shows no signs of slowing. U.S. vinyl sales rose for the 19th consecutive year to 47.9 million units, with independent record stores accounting for roughly four out of every ten purchases. Buying habits across physical formats are also shifting as direct-to-consumer sales now represent 13.6% of all physical album purchases, according to Luminate. The continued demand for physical media helps explain why companies like Denon are expanding their turntable lineups.

Although Denon is perhaps best known for its AV receivers, the company has a long history of producing turntables. Its current range includes the DP-450USB ($799), DP-400 ($599), DP-300F ($499), DP-29F ($219), and the flagship DP-3000NE ($2,799). The new DP-500BT joins that lineup as a belt-drive design that blends classic analog playback with the convenience of Bluetooth connectivity.

Inside the Denon DP-500BT Bluetooth Turntable

denon-dp500-bt-turntable-angle

The Denon DP-500BT is a semi-automatic belt-drive turntable that combines traditional analog playback with built-in Bluetooth connectivity. It can be used with modern wireless audio systems or connected to conventional Hi-Fi setups through its analog outputs. The turntable includes an integrated moving magnet phono preamp that can be bypassed if you prefer to use an external phono stage. Wireless playback is supported via Bluetooth with compatibility for aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive codecs.

Lyle Smith, President of Sound United at HARMAN, explained, “The DP-500BT brings timeless analog and modern wireless freedom together in a way only Denon can. Whether someone is building their first vinyl setup or expanding an existing system, this turntable delivers a premium experience with simple, flexible Bluetooth streaming that carries the depth and detail of vinyl into any room.”

Advertisement
denon-dp500-bt-turntable-tonearm

The DP-500BT uses a precision belt-drive system designed to maintain stable platter rotation. It includes a die-cast aluminum platter that adds mass for smoother operation and improved speed stability. Denon also equips the turntable with its balanced S-shaped tonearm, intended to support accurate tracking and help reduce distortion during playback.

A pre installed moving magnet (MM) cartridge and a built in switchable phono preamp are included, allowing the DP-500BT to connect to a wide range of audio systems, including powered speakers and traditional Hi-Fi components.

denon-dp500-bt-turntable-rear-inputs

However, what sets the DP-500BT apart from many turntables is its built-in Bluetooth transmitter, which supports aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive codecs. This allows users to play vinyl records wirelessly through compatible Bluetooth devices, including headphones, receivers, and powered speakers. In addition, semi-automatic operation with auto lift and playback stop helps protect records while making everyday listening easier and more convenient.

denon-dp500-bt-turntable-front-right-corner

Cast metal feet and vibration-resistant construction maintain stability. A removable dust cover preserves the matte finish. Every element supports both the visual identity and the performance standard expected from Denon.

The design of the DP-500BT reflects Denon’s refined, modern aesthetic with a two-tone finish and minimalist design that fits with a wide range of interiors. 

Advertisement
denon-dp500-bt-turntable-speed-knob

Denon DP-500BT Key Features

  • Pure Vinyl Playback: Stable platter rotation and careful mechanical design help preserve the character and detail of vinyl records while minimizing distortion.
  • Bluetooth Streaming: Vinyl records can be played wirelessly through compatible Bluetooth speakers or headphones throughout the home.
  • Precision Engineered Construction: A die cast aluminum platter, vibration resistant chassis, and balanced S shaped tonearm are designed to reduce resonance and support stable playback.
  • Belt Drive System: The belt drive design helps isolate motor vibration from the platter, contributing to consistent rotation and cleaner playback.
  • Semi Automatic Operation: Automatic tonearm lift and playback stop help protect the stylus and records while making operation easier.
  • Built In Phono Preamp: A switchable phono preamp allows the DP-500BT to connect directly to powered speakers, receivers, or amplifiers that do not include a dedicated phono input.

Comparison

denon-dp-500bt-technics-sl-40cbt-sony-ps-lx5bt
Denon DP-500BT (2026) Technics SL-40CBT (2025) Sony PS-LX5BT (2026)
Product Type Turntable Turntable  Turntable
Price $899 $899 $499
Turntable Type Belt-Drive Direct Drive Belt-Drive
Motor DC Brushless DC motor DC
Operation Semi-Automatic Manual Semi-Automatic
Tonearm S-Type Static Balance Straight
Auto tonearm lift at the end Yes Yes
Speed (RPM) 33-1/3, 45, 78 33-1/3, 45 33-1/3, 45
Wow & flutter (WRMS) 0.08% 0.025% 0.1%
Phono EQ built-in Yes, switchable Yes, Switchable Yes, Switchable
Cartridge Type MM (Moving Magnet) MM (Moving Magnet) 
Audio-Technica AT-VM95C 
MM (Moving Magnet)
Sony
Stylus CN-6518 Conical Stylus Not Indicated
Universal Headshell Yes Yes – 
Rated Output 2.5 mV / 1 kHz 2.5 mV / 1 kHz 2.5 mV / 1 kHz
Frequency Range 20 Hz – 20 kHz Not Indicated 20 Hz – 20 kHz
S/N ratio 65 dB 78 dB 50 dB
Rated Output Phono EQ 150 mV / 1 kHz 150 mV / 1 kHz Not Indicated
Frequency Range Phono EQ 20 Hz – 20 kHz Not Indicated Not Indicated
USB Direct Recording Output port Type-B
Bluetooth Transmitter SBC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive SBC, aptX Adaptive SBC, aptX, aptX Adaptive
Dust Cover Yes, removable Yes Yes, removable
Power supply  AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz AC 120 V, 60 Hz AC100-240 V 50 / 60 Hz
Colors Black Light grey, 
Charcoal Black
Terracotta
Matte Black
Dimensions (WxDxH) 425 x 367 x 118 mm
 
16.7 x 14.4 x 4.65 in
430 x 353 x 128 mm 

16.9 x 13.9 x 5 in 

430 x 366 x 117 mm

17 x 14.5 x 4.6 in

Weight 6 kg / 13.2 lbs 7.1kg / 15.7 lbs 3.6 kg / 7.9 lbs
denon-dp500-bt-turntable-lid-closed
denon-dp500-bt-turntable-rear

The Bottom Line 

Streaming is undoubtedly the most popular way to listen to music, but physical media hasn’t quite lost its magic yet. CDs and audio cassettes are making comebacks, but vinyl records have an extra special place in the music listening landscape. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

As a result, there are an increasing number of turntables that also include Bluetooth as a way to stream vinyl record listening all around the house, whether it be on Bluetooth speakers, wireless headphones, or earbuds, without having to have a turntable in every room. 

Denon is the latest to integrate Bluetooth in its turntable line with DP-500BT, but there is also a lot of competition from noted brands, such as the Technics SL-40CBT and Sony PS-LX5BT.  The question is, has Denon entered the Bluetooth Turntable game too late to be competitive? Or is this just the right time to unite the old world and the new? We shall soon find out.

denon-dp500-bt-turntable-angle-lid-open

Price & Availability

The Denon DP-500BT Bluetooth turntable is priced at $899 at Crutchfield and can be purchased through Denon and authorized retailers in select global markets.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Bills Would Ban Liability Lawsuits For Climate Change

Published

on

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News: Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms — even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount. It’s the latest in a counter-offensive that has unfolded on multiple fronts, from the halls of Congress and the White House to courts and state attorneys general offices across the country.

Dozens of local communities, states and individuals are suing major oil and gas companies and their trade associations over rising climate costs and for allegedly lying to consumers about climate change risks and solutions. At the same time, some states are enacting or considering laws modeled after the federal Superfund program that would impose retroactive liability on large fossil fuel producers and levy a one-time charge on them to help fund climate adaptation and resiliency measures. But many of these cases and climate superfund laws could be stopped in their tracks, either by the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court or by the Republican-controlled Congress.

Last month the court decided to take up a petition lodged by oil companies Suncor and ExxonMobil in a climate-damages case brought against the companies by Boulder, Colorado. The petition argues that Boulder’s claims are barred by federal law, and if the justices agree, it could knock out not only Boulder’s lawsuit but also many others like it. The court is expected to hear the case during its upcoming term that starts in October. There is also a possibility that Republicans in Congress will take action before then to gift the fossil fuel industry legal immunity, similar to that granted to gun manufacturers with the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Sixteen Republican attorneys general wrote (PDF) to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in June suggesting that the Department of Justice could recommend legislation creating precisely this type of liability shield. And last month, one Republican congresswoman announced that such legislation is indeed in the works. “The ultimate democratic institution in America is the jury,” said former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee. Enacting policies that prevent or block climate-related lawsuits against polluters, he said, would effectively shutter “the doors of the courthouse to Americans that have been injured by oil and gas company pollution and by their lies and deceit about that pollution.”

“I really think it’s an un-American effort to deny Americans the traditional right of access to a jury,” Inslee said. Oil and gas executives are “terrified” by the prospect of having to stand before a jury and face evidence of their climate-change lies and deception, he added. “You’ll see the steam coming out of the jury’s ears when they hear about how they’ve been lied to for decades. [Oil companies] understand why juries will be outraged by it, and they are shaking in their boots. The day of reckoning is coming, and that’s why they’re afraid.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Gecko Robotics lands $71M Navy deal

Published

on

The Pittsburgh startup’s AI platform will create digital twins of Pacific Fleet vessels, starting with 18 ships, as the Navy races to fix a maintenance crisis costing up to $20 billion a year.


Roughly 40% of the United States Navy’s fleet is unavailable at any given time. Ships are queued in dry dock. Maintenance cycles stretch across months. The cost of the backlog, according to Gecko Robotics CEO Jake Loosararian, runs somewhere between $13 billion and $20 billion annually. And as he puts it, “at a time when you need every asset you can get, that’s pretty critical.”

On Tuesday, the Pittsburgh startup announced it had signed a five-year IDIQ (indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity) contract with the US Navy and the General Services Administration, with a ceiling of $71 million.

The initial award stands at $54 million. It is the largest contract the Navy has ever awarded Gecko Robotics , and the largest robotics deal the Navy has signed to date.

Advertisement

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The work begins immediately with 18 ships in the US Pacific Fleet, destroyers, amphibious warships, and littoral combat ships, over the next nine months. Gecko’s wall-climbing robots, drones, and sensors will crawl across hulls, decks, and welds, gathering data points that would take human inspectors weeks to collect.

That raw data feeds into Cantilever, the company’s AI-powered operating platform, which converts it into a detailed digital twin of each vessel: a living, updatable model of the ship’s structural health.

Advertisement

The company says its technology can identify necessary repairs up to 50 times faster and more accurately than manual inspection techniques. Critically, the inspection can happen before a ship even reaches dry dock, meaning the right parts and personnel can be staged in advance, rather than the process beginning only once the vessel is already out of service.

Defense One reported that just 41% of ships completed repairs on time in 2025, well short of the Navy’s 71% goal. The Navy has since reset its target to above 60%, with the broader ambition of reaching 80% fleet combat surge readiness by 2027.

Gecko’s contract structure is also notable for its scope: because it runs through the GSA, any branch of the Department of Defense can access the company’s AI and robotics under the agreement, not just the Navy.

“Readiness isn’t just a metric. It’s all that matters,” Loosararian said in a statement. “This growing partnership is about the unfair advantages Gecko is deploying to our Navy and how prediction, through our robotics and AI products, ensures our brave men and women are the most advantaged in the world in their fight to defend freedom.”

Advertisement

The contract arrives at a moment of heightened urgency around US shipbuilding capacity. The Trump administration released a multi-page plan in February to revive the sector, which has fallen significantly behind China. Pennsylvania Senator Dave McCormick, in a statement, said the deal demonstrated how “engineers, researchers, and skilled tradesmen from a great Pennsylvania company are leading advances in technology, artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and robotics and giving our military the capabilities it needs for the next generation of American defence.”

Gecko is not new to the Navy. The company, co-founded by Loosararian and Troy Demmer, now its president, has previously deployed its TOKA series robots on destroyers, amphibious vessels, and aircraft carriers, and has worked with defence prime contractor L3Harris on digital twins for military aircraft.

Earlier this year it partnered with BPMI, a contractor for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Programme, to cut inspection times on nuclear carrier and submarine components by up to 90%.

The company was last valued at $1.25 billion following a Series D round led by Cox Enterprises in June 2025, which brought its total funding to $173 million. It remains private. The TOKA robots that will crawl the Pacific Fleet’s hulls are the same ones Gecko has been deploying in power generation, oil and gas, and heavy manufacturing for years, the argument being that the physical world, whether it’s a coal boiler or a guided-missile destroyer, yields its secrets the same way: slowly, and only to whoever has the patience to look closely enough.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

FullSpectrum Is Like HueForge For 3D Models, But Bring Your Toolchanger

Published

on

Full-color 3D printing is something of a holy grail, if nothing else just because of how much it impresses the normies. We’ve seen a lot of multi-material units the past few years, and with Snapmaker’s U1 and the Prusa XL it looks like tool changers are coming back into vogue. Just in time, [Radoux] has a fork of OrcaSlicer called FullSpectrum that brings HueForge-like color mixing to tool changing printers.

The hook behind FullSpectrum is very simple: stacking thin layers of colors, preferably with semi-translucent filament, allows for a surprising degree of mixing. The towers in the image above have only three colors: red, blue, and yellow. It’s not literally full-spectrum, but you can generate surprisingly large palettes this way. You aren’t limited to single-layer mixes, either: A-A-B repeats and even arbitrary patterns of four colors are possible, assuming you have a four-head tool changing printer like the Snapmaker U1 this is being developed for.

FullSpectrum is in fact a fork of Snapmaker’s fork of OrcaSlicer, which is itself forked from Bambu Slicer, which forked off of PrusaSlicer, which originated as a fork of Slic3r. Some complain about the open-source chaos of endless forking, but you can see in that chain how much innovation it gets us — including this technique of color mixing by alternating layers.

[Wombly Wonders] shows the limits of this in his video: you really want layer heights of 0.8 mm to 0.12 mm, as the standard 0.2 mm height introduces striping, particularly with opaque filaments. Depending on the colors and the overhang, you might get away with it, but thinner layers generally going to be a safer bet. Fully translucent filaments can blend a little too well at the edges, but the HueForge community — that we’ve covered previously — has already got a good handle on characterizing translucency and we’ll likely see a lot of that knowledge applied to FullSpectrum OrcaSlicer as time goes on.

Advertisement

Now, you could probably use this technique with an multi-material unit (MMU), but the tool-changing printers are where it is going to shine because they’re so much faster at it. With the right tool-changer, it’s actually faster to run off a model mixing colors from the cyan-yellow-magenta color space that it is to print the same model with the exact colors needed loaded on an MMU. That’s unexpected, but [Wombly] does demonstrate in his video with a chicken that’s listed as taking nineteen hours on Bambu’s MakerWorld as taking under seven hours.

Could this be the killer app that pushes tool-change printers into the spotlight? Maybe! Tool changing printers are nothing new, after all. We’ve even seen it done with a delta, and lots of other DIY options if you don’t fancy buying the big Prusa. If you’ve been lusting after such a beast, though, you might finally have your excuse.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Oukitel WP61 Plus rugged phone review

Published

on

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Oukitel WP61 Plus: 30-second review

Unveiled at IFA 2025 in Berlin, the Oukitel WP61 Plus is the brand’s flagship all-in-one rugged smartphone, featuring a 20,000 mAh battery, an integrated 2W DMR walkie-talkie, and a high-powered camping flashlight.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Not a fan of Liquid Glass? This isn’t the news for you

Published

on

If you were hoping Apple might rethink its Liquid Glass interface any time soon, the latest reports suggest that’s unlikely.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, early internal builds of upcoming Apple software show no major design changes to the visual overhaul introduced with iOS 26.

Liquid Glass first arrived across Apple’s recent platforms, including iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe. This brought a translucent, layered look to menus, widgets and system UI elements. While the redesign sparked mixed reactions from users, it appears Apple is committed to refining the style. They are refining it rather than replacing it.

The report says internal versions of iOS 27 and macOS 27 largely stick with the same design direction. That’s partly because the interface has strong backing internally. Apple’s new software design chief Steve Lemay — who took over the role after Alan Dye departed for Meta — was closely involved in developing Liquid Glass. In fact, he is expected to continue evolving the concept rather than replacing it outright.

Advertisement

That approach mirrors how Apple handled another major visual shift in the past. When iOS 7 abandoned skeuomorphic textures for a flat design, Apple spent several years gradually refining the look. Instead of dramatically changing it again, they chose to refine it.

Advertisement

In the meantime, Apple has already started offering small tweaks for users who find the effect too strong. Updates like iOS 26.1 introduced a “Tinted” option that increases the opacity of Liquid Glass elements across the system. Additionally, iOS 26.2 added a slider to adjust the transparency of the Lock Screen clock.

Apple had reportedly explored a system-wide Liquid Glass opacity slider during the development of iOS 26. However, they ran into engineering challenges when trying to apply the setting consistently across the entire interface. According to Gurman, the company could revisit that idea in a future version of iOS 27.

Advertisement

For now, though, the direction seems clear: Liquid Glass isn’t a short-lived experiment; it’s the foundation of Apple’s next generation of software design.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Best Data Broker Removal Services (2026): Which One Really Reduces Your Online Exposure?

Published

on

No matter how much we don’t like and oppose it, personal data is now a commodity. Our phone numbers, addresses, shopping habits, or employment history details are collected, analyzed, and traded among data brokers, marketers, recruiters, insurers, and countless other buyers, not to mention frauds and thieves.

However, trying to remove your online presence manually means tracking down every single company that holds your data (which can be hundreds), submitting legal deletion requests, and repeating the process when your data reappears or your request is ignored. This can easily become a full-time job.

That’s why data broker removal services exist: to automate, manage, and repeat those requests on your behalf.

But how to choose the best provider? Below, you will find a 2026 evaluation of the most recognized names in the industry.

Advertisement

Top Data Broker Removal Services at a Glance

Category Incogni Aura DeleteMe Optery OneRep
Pricing (monthly when billed annually) From $7.99 From $9.99 From $6.97 From $3.25 From $8.33
Free option 30-day money-back guarantee 14-day free trial, 60-day money-back guarantee Free scan Basicself-service, 30-day money-back guarantee 5-day trial, 30-day money-back guarantee
Automation Level High Medium-High Medium-Low Medium Medium-High
Broker coverage 420+ public and private brokers 200+ brokers, mainly private up to 850+ brokers (varies by plan), mainly public 120-640+sites (varies by plan) 310+ sites, mainly public
Verification Dashboard, Deloitte Limited Assurance Report App alerts and screenshots Quarterly reports and screenshots Screenshots and exposure scans Dashboard and monthly reports
Best for Long-term, low-effort privacy Identity + privacy bundle Detailed proof and control Data exposure prediction Public removals, Families

Incogni: Best for Balanced Automation, Coverage, and Accountability

Overview and Pricing

Incogni focuses on the continuous removal of personal data from data brokers, including both public people-search sites and private commercial databases.

Incogni’s plans start at $7.99/month when billed annually, and even the basic option contains all you need for effective data removal. Higher-tier plans only change prioritization and scope. There’s no free option, but you can take advantage of its 30-day money-back guarantee to see if the service suits your needs.

Features

  • Fully-automated opt-out and deletion requests across 420+ data brokers
  • Recurring removal cycles: 60 days for public, 90 days for private brokers
  • Real-time dashboard tracking
  • Unlimited custom removal requests (plan-dependent)
  • Family plans and multiple-user accounts
  • Operational processes audited via a limited assurance report by Deloitte

Effectiveness

Supported by Deloitte’s limited assurance assessment, Incogni officially reports that it has processed 245+ million removal requests from 2022 to mid-2025, indicating sustained operations rather than one-time cleanups. As data brokers can reacquire information and their databases refresh regularly, the recurring cycle is vital if you want to protect your online footprint in the long run.

Transparency and Reputation

Apart from a limited assurance report by Deloitte, the service also holds Editors’ Choice Awards from PCMag and PCWorld, which praise its automation system and wide coverage.

On Trustpilot, Incogni has generally positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.4 based on over 2,000 reviews. Users often note actual reductions in spam and visible listings.

Advertisement

User Experience

Once you set up your account, you need to verify your identity. After that, Incogni will handle most data removal activity in the background without involving you directly. The clear, straightforward dashboard will show you all the brokers Incogni has contacted, confirmed removals, responses, and next scheduled cycles. You can peek into it whenever you like, but you don’t have to engage to make the process effective.

Advantages Disadvantages
High automation No screenshots
Broad coverage No free trial
Deloitte Limited Assurance Report Basic reporting
30-day money-back guarantee Phone support only on Unlimited plans
Industry recognition
Recurring cycles and resubmitted requests
Clear interface, straightforward user experience

Aura: Best All-in-One Identity and Privacy Suite

Overview and Pricing

Aura is not a provider like others on this list, as it combines data removal service with broader digital protection features, including credit alerts, antivirus, VPN, device security, and identity theft monitoring.

Aura’s prices begin at $9.99/month when billed annually. What’s more, you get a 14-day free trial and a 60-day money-back guarantee for risk-free testing.

Features

  • Automated data removal across 200+ data brokers (mainly private)
  • Identity theft monitoring
  • Dark web monitoring
  • Credit score and breach alerts
  • Antivirus/anti-malware protection
  • VPN
  • Family and multi-device plans

Effectiveness

When it comes to data removal itself, this Aura functionality is automated. The platform first scans broker and people-search sites, submits deletion requests whenever finding your

information, and re-checks for reappearances. However, as it’s not its main focus, its data removal coverage is quite narrow compared to dedicated solutions. Aura’s value is the strongest only if combined with the whole toolkit.

Advertisement

Transparency and Reputation

Aura has been widely described in the identity protection space with overall positive sentiments. You can find Aura reviews on PCMag, Forbes, and NerdWallet. On Trustpilot, it holds an average rating of 4.2 based on almost 1,000 reviews. Users appreciate its all-in-one service, but broker removal results themselves don’t match those ensured by services focused exclusively on that problem.

User Experience

Aura’s interface contains all the features offered by the providers, showing alerts, scans, security postures, removal status, and more. This holistic view appeals to people who seek central management of their online presence, but for many users, it can be overwhelming.

Advantages Disadvantages
Privacy+security bundle Narrower coverage
Insurance Manual approval steps
60-day money-back guarantee Overwhelming user experience
14-day free trial No third-party verification
Comprehensive alerts

DeleteMe: Strong for Proved Public People-Search Listing Deletion

Overview and Pricing

DeleteMe focuses on public people-search sites and background information databases. These are mentions that usually appear in search results when someone Googles your name.

The cheapest DeleteMe plan is $6.97/month when billed annually and can be used by 1 person.

Advertisement

Features

  • Automated scans of people-search sites (up to 850+, depending on the plan)
  • Expert manual handling
  • Quarterly detailed reports
  • Coverage for individuals, couples, and families
  • Limited custom removal requests (40-60 per year, plan-dependent)
  • DIY opt-out tutorials

Effectiveness

DeleteMe is quite effective at removing visible information from many major public listings. The company was a pioneer when, in 2010, it entered the industry with its

part-automatic, part-human-assisted approach. The team submits requests and tracks

progress, then provides you with scheduled, detailed reports that include, for example, even screenshots.

Transparency and Reputation

DeleteMe has been in the industry since 2010, which says a lot about its reliability. It has generally positive user reviews, especially when it comes to its detailed reporting system and exhaustive explanations about what was removed. There have been no third-party assessments of its services, but the provider has a good reputation in the industry, as seen in the review in PCMag or praise from Forbes. When it comes to user feedback, it has a rating of

4.0 on Trustpilot, though based only on 180+ reviews.

Advertisement

User Experience

Contrary to Incogni’s live and always-on progress monitoring, which you can check but don’t have to, DeleteMe is more report-centric. Users receive quarterly PDF summaries that show what sites were contacted, where their information was removed, and what remains pending.

Many people appreciate their human approach.

Advantages Disadvantages
Clear, detailed reporting Slower cycles
Long-standing service Less automation
Human expertise Narrower broker reach
30-day money-back guarantee US-mainly coverage

Optery: Best for Exposure Visibility

Overview and Pricing

Optery’s main field of expertise is discovering where your personal data exists, providing users with insight into exposures before and during removal attempts.

Optery’s offer starts at $3.25/month when billed annually. The company also has a free, self-service version. Apart from that, you get a free scan and a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Advertisement

Features

  • Exposure dashboard displaying where your personal data exists
  • Automated removal from up to 630+ brokers with paid plans
  • Initial free scan across 120+ sites and free self-service plan
  • Guided removal request sending process
  • Custom removal submissions
  • Manual tracking of opt-outs and their status

Effectiveness

Optery is most effective at identifying where your personal data has been exposed. Then, for its removal, it blends automatic attempts with user-guided actions and manual tracking.

It doesn’t have the same automated recurring cycles as, for example, Incogni, but it may be helpful if you want to truly understand data exposures.

Transparency and Reputation

Optery is often highlighted for its exposure insights and transparency. Users appreciate the “seeing where my data lives” model, but many note that broader coverage comes only with more expensive plans, while manual user input is still needed.

On Trustpilot, Optery has 171 reviews with an average rating of 4.1. It has also been reviewed by PCMag quite enthusiastically, though they mentioned that the service doesn’t distinguish between removed data and never-found data. TechRadar praised it for its ease of use.

User Experience

Optery is more interactive and gives you more control of the process (which can be both an advantage and a disadvantage, depending on how much time you’re willing to sacrifice). Its dashboard clearly shows where your personal data is, and then you need to decide which removals are more important and what to do next. You also get before and after screenshots as visual proof, while reports are AI-improved to make them more accurate and detailed.

Advertisement
Advantages Disadvantages
Free scan Broader coverage with more expensive plans
Free self-service US-focused
30-day money-back guarantee Slower with cheaper plans
Clear interface & control No phone support

Onerep: Best for Public Listing Removal and Families

What It Does

OneRep automates removal requests issued to public people-search sites. Its focus is on high-risk databases like Intelius and Whitepages. The service also ensures quarterly recurring checks to combat resurfacing of your data.

However, there’s significant controversy around the company (more of that below).

Onerep’s prices start at $8.33/month when billed annually. It also offers a 5-day free trial. What makes it attractive and more affordable is its family plans that cover up to 6 members.

Features

  • Automated scans and removal requests across 310+ data brokers
  • Quarterly re-scanning
  • Great family value
  • Clear and straightforward dashboard tracking

Effectiveness

Optery is effective when it comes to reducing online visibility on many public sites, including those deemed high-risk. However, this provider doesn’t focus on private commercial

brokers that are responsible for a large portion of the spam. It makes Optery’s reach much narrower.

Advertisement

Transparency and Reputation

OneRep has a mixed reputation in the privacy protection community.

User reviews vary: some praise successful public listing removals, while others complain about slow relisting or only partial effects. Still, it holds a quite impressive average rating of

4.7 on Trustpilot based on almost 400 reviews.

However, it’s essential to know that Krebs on Security revealed that in March 2024, Mozilla decided to drop OneRep from its list of recommendations due to the company’s CEO’s involvement in running people-search networks. This raised serious questions about conflict of interest in the industry. While the provider stated that Onerep operates completely independently and never sells user information, it is still often referenced in privacy circles.

Advertisement

User Experience

Onerep’s dashboard is pretty simple to manage. It shows progress on targeted sites and all removal requests, though it’s not really an automated model, so it only suits users who don’t mind handling the process.

Advantages Disadvantages
Great family value Industry controversies
5-day free trial 30-day money-back guarantee highly conditioned
Quarterly re-scans US focus
Public listing coverage Little customization
No third-party verification
Narrower scope

Final Perspective for 2026

When it comes to choosing a data removal service, the main difference is usually in scope and depth. Some providers focus on visible people-search listings, while others dig deeper to find your personal information in harder-to-find databases. They also vary in the recurring cycles they offer (or not).

Managing your overall online visibility is vital, but if you really want to reduce the amount of your information circulating on the web, you need to focus on less visible broker networks. Or rather, choose a provider built around large-scale broker coverage. Only then will you be able to enjoy more sustained results.

In 2026, Incogni stands out among its competition, as it combines a wide broker reach, continuous removal cycles, and a streamlined, low-maintenance experience. Not to mention that it was independently assessed. While other providers are not to be altogether dismissed, Incogni’s focused, automated approach offers the most comprehensive way out.

Advertisement

FAQ

Why can’t I just remove my data from brokers myself?

Manual removal means identifying hundreds of brokers, submitting individual opt-out requests, repeatedly verifying your identity, and rechecking when your data reappears. For most people, that quickly becomes too time-consuming to manage consistently.

How often does my data reappear after removal?
Advertisement

Data brokers regularly refresh and repurchase data, which means listings can resurface even after deletion. That’s why recurring removal cycles are critical for long-term results.

What’s the difference between public and private data brokers?

Public brokers (like people-search sites) display your information in search results, while private brokers trade data behind the scenes with marketers, insurers, and other businesses. Private databases often contribute more to spam and profiling, even if you don’t see them.

Advertisement
Do all services provide proof that removals were completed?

No. Some providers offer screenshots or quarterly reports, while others rely on dashboards or summary updates. The level of transparency varies significantly by service.

Advertisement
Is a bundled identity protection service enough for data removal?

All-in-one tools can help, but their broker coverage is often narrower than services dedicated specifically to data removal. If reducing online exposure is your main goal, specialized coverage may deliver stronger results.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Recycled Plastic Compression Molding With 3D-Printed Molds

Published

on

Recycling plastic at home using 3D printed molds is relatively accessible these days, but if you do not wish to invest a lot of money into specialized equipment, what’s the most minimal setup that you can get away with? In a recent [future things] video DIY plastic recycling is explored using only equipment that the average home is likely to have around.

Lest anyone complain, you should always wear PPE such as gloves and a suitable respirator whenever you’re dealing with hot plastic in this manner, just to avoid a trip to the emergency room. Once taken care of that issue, there are a few ways of doing molding, with compression molding being one of the most straightforward types.

With compression molding you got two halves of a mold, of which one compresses the material inside the other half. This means that you do not require any complex devices like with injection molding, just a toaster oven or equivalent to melt the plastic, which is LDPE in this example. The scrap plastic is placed in a silicone cup before it’s heated so that it doesn’t stick to the container.

The wad of goopy plastic is then put inside the bottom part of the mold before the top part is put in place and squeezed by hand until molten plastic comes out of the overflow opening(s). After letting it fully cool down, the mold is opened and the part released. Although the demonstrated process can be improved upon, it seems to work well enough if you are aware of the limitations. In terms of costs and parts required it’s definitely hard to come up with a cheaper way to do plastic molding.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Creative's Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro brings discrete audio back from the grave

Published

on


While the traditional discrete sound card has largely become a niche product for enthusiasts and hardware obsessives, Creative is attempting to attract new customers with a fresh model. The newly launched Sound Blaster Audigy Fx Pro can significantly upgrade the audio experience, the company says, and includes an additional layer…
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025