from the the-appearance-of-a-conflict-is-a-conflict dept

This story was originally published by ProPublica. Republished under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.

The rich and famous who filed into the Kennedy Center’s opera house in December were there to enjoy one of the nation’s most exclusive celebrations of the performing arts: the center’s annual honors gala.

The black-tie event, hosted by President Donald Trump, prioritized tickets to people who donated more than $75,000 to the center. This year, it feted Hollywood icon Sylvester Stallone, the legendary glam rock band Kiss and the Grammy Award-winning disco pioneer Gloria Gaynor.

Among the attendees that evening were two lower-profile government officials whose regulatory decisions had been crucial to the future of the gala’s broadcast sponsor, CBS, and its parent company, Paramount.

Five months earlier, Federal Communications Commissioner Olivia Trusty cast a decisive vote approving Paramount’s historic $8 billion merger with Skydance Media. Now, the commissioner and a guest enjoyed the star-studded celebration thanks to tickets gifted to her by Paramount worth more than $12,000, according to ethics disclosure records obtained by ProPublica.

The other commissioner who approved the merger watched from a prized perch. FCC Chair Brendan Carr and his wife sat in a private skybox with Paramount CEO David Ellison and other executives from Paramount and CBS. Such seats sold for $125,000 a ticket, according to Kennedy Center guidelines.

It’s unclear if Paramount gifted Carr the premium seats because the FCC has yet to make public his financial disclosure for last year.

However, past disclosures show Carr and Trusty are among seven FCC commissioners who have accepted Kennedy gala tickets from CBS or its parent company over the last decade. Ethics experts told ProPublica this poses a blatant conflict of interest since the commission regulates the network. Carr’s previous financial statements show he has accepted tickets at least seven times since his 2017 appointment, totaling over $63,000 in gifts.

Last December’s ceremony attended by Trusty and Carr took place as Paramount was launching a hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, a move that would later result in a merger agreement that requires FCC approval.

Federal ethics rules ban employees from taking gifts from any entity that does business with, is regulated by or seeks official action from their agency.

Four ethics experts told ProPublica that by accepting the premium tickets Trusty and Carr compromised the FCC’s impartiality and should not take part in any upcoming decision on the merger.

“There’s no way that any top federal regulator should ever, ever accept a gift from a regulated company with interests their work will foreseeably affect,” said Walter Shaub, who led the federal Office of Government Ethics from 2013 to 2017. “The appearance of taking gifts like that is terrible. What’s at stake is nothing less than the public’s trust in government.”

Virginia Canter, who served as an ethics lawyer at the White House, Treasury Department, and Securities and Exchange Commission during the presidencies of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, said the commissioners who accepted tickets cannot participate in this matter without damaging the integrity of the government’s decision-making process.

“This is shocking. Pretty disturbing, that’s what I would say. I just don’t understand what they were thinking,” said Canter, who now works as chief counsel for ethics and corruption at the nonpartisan government watchdog group Democracy Defenders Fund.

The FCC’s review of the merger is one of the final hurdles facing a historic $110 billion consolidation of two of the five largest film studios in Hollywood. The deal would unite Paramount Skydance with Warner Bros., bringing under the control of one company Paramount+ and HBO Max streaming services; CBS and CNN; and scores of other major broadcast channels, cable networks, and digital platforms.

The new megacorporation, which could reshape how millions will access news, movies, sports and video games, faces fierce opposition from inside and outside Hollywood. More than 5,000 actors, producers and entertainment workers — including stars such as Robert De Niro, Javier Bardem, Joaquin Phoenix and Glenn Close — signed an open letter decrying how the consolidation would eliminate jobs and compromise “the integrity, independence, and diversity of our industry.”

On Monday, California, New York and 10 other Democratic states filed a lawsuit seeking to block the merger under federal and state anti-monopoly laws.

American and international regulators are evaluating the deal for its potential national security implications and impacts to consumers worldwide. Last week, the British government signaled it planned to investigate whether the new entertainment titan that would emerge from the union would unfairly stifle competition. The FCC’s ongoing review includes examining the Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds backing the deal, including from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Abu Dhabi.

The FCC usually has five commissioners — all appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate to serve five-year terms — but the agency currently has only three. Any vote by the full commission would likely be decided by Republicans Carr and Trusty over Democrat Anna Gomez. Gomez was not at the December 2025 show but has accepted tickets from Paramount in the past. Because the FCC requires a three-commissioner quorum for a vote, any recusal could leave the panel unable to decide on the merger. Carr could decide to ask staff to approve the deal rather than bring it to a commission vote, but the ethics experts said he should recuse himself from any decisions affecting the Paramount merger.

The experts warned the commissioners’ gifts might become central in legal challenges and said the Justice Department should investigate potential violations of federal rules or laws.

Neither Carr nor Trusty responded to ProPublica’s requests for comment. Gomez said in a statement that she followed agency advice when she attended the event in 2023 and 2024. Her statement did not elaborate or otherwise address why taking gifts from Paramount did not pose a conflict of interest.

An FCC spokesperson said agency ethics officers have for years cleared commissioner appearances, finding it consistent with ethics law.

“FCC Chairs and officials have attended the same event, in the same ways, consistently from the Trump Administration to the Biden Administration to the Obama Administration,” the FCC said in a statement. “There has been no change in recent years.”

Shaub called the justification outrageous.

“It’s no excuse to say that you took the gift because everyone else was doing it or that your agency has had a bad habit of indulging in gift taking for a long time,” Shaub said. “That kind of explanation doesn’t work for school children, and it sure as hell doesn’t work for government officials who are supposed to have better judgment than a fifth grader.”

Despite their oversight role, FCC members have long enjoyed a night out at the Kennedy Center courtesy of CBS or its parent company. Seven of the 10 commissioners who served since 2016 accepted tickets worth more than $260,000, according to a ProPublica analysis of ethics disclosures.

Carr’s predecessor, Jessica Rosenworcel, who was appointed FCC chair by President Joe Biden and stepped down in January 2025, attended regularly.

Rosenworcel and several other former commissioners who accepted the tickets did not respond to requests for comment. The one commissioner who didn’t accept a single gift, Nathan Simington, said he received the Kennedy Center invites from CBS and Paramount but turned them down because it “wasn’t my cup of tea.”

A review of 10 years of disclosures shows commissioners accepted paid trips from various sponsors to appear at banquets and speak at conferences. Some of those gifts came from other media companies regulated by the FCC. NBCUniversal, ABC-Disney and Fox News, for instance, paid for commissioners to attend White House Correspondents’ Association dinners, records show. The total value of the combined gifts topped $308,000. But the vast majority came from CBS and its parent company.

Melissa Zukerman, Paramount’s chief communications officer, said it was a decades-long “CBS practice to invite government officials from both parties” to the Kennedy Center show. She didn’t address why the practice continued after new ownership took over last year, the purpose of the gifts or whether the tickets posed a conflict of interest.

Carr, who joined the FCC as a staffer in 2012 and rose to become the agency’s general counsel, was appointed to serve as a commissioner by Trump during his first term. Since then, Carr has accepted tickets annually, except when the 2020 event was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to his public disclosures.

Carr did not respond to an email request from ProPublica for his latest ethics report, which would indicate whether Paramount also paid for him to attend last December’s gala. The FCC referred us to the Office of Government Ethics, which told us that the FCC had not yet provided the disclosure. The FCC did not respond to our subsequent requests for the record.

A 2009 Office of Government Ethics memo gave federal employees the right to attend Kennedy Center events but explicitly said officials cannot accept free attendance “offered by persons other than the Kennedy Center and its trustees, officers and employees.” In 2016, the ethics office tightened its gift requirements, warning officials to avoid any appearance “of loss of impartiality.”

There is an exemption to the gift rules that allows free entry to gatherings that are widely attended and paid for by third parties, but only if certain conditions are met.

The event must “further agency programs or operations,” and the agency’s interest in an official attending must outweigh “concern that the employee may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of official duties,” according to the federal rules.

As an example, the Office of Government Ethics said an industry-wide seminar attended by more than 100 people could be allowed if the employee’s participation would be in the agency’s interest. But those attending should “represent a range of persons interested in a given matter” and the event must provide a “structured opportunity” to exchange ideas and views among invitees.

The office clarified in a 2007 memo that performing arts presentations would not count even if they, like the honors gala, have a reception before or afterward at which officials can mingle with other attendees.

Canter, the former White House ethics lawyer, said it would be a “stretch” for the FCC to argue the exemptions apply to the Kennedy Center’s annual show, where famous musicians perform and celebrities laud those who are being honored. “It’s not what we would consider a widely attended gathering,” she said.

Kedric Payne, general counsel and senior director of ethics at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan watchdog group, noted that federal rules also require agencies to weigh the market value of the attendance, its relevance to the agency, any sensitive pending matters involving the donor and whether accepting free tickets creates an appearance of preferential treatment.

“The ethics rules are designed to prevent this exact situation,” he said, adding that it is an “obvious conflict of interest” for an official to “accept expensive gifts from anyone with decisions pending before the agency. This matters because it makes the public question whether official decisions are free from the improper influence of wealthy special interests.”

An FCC official familiar with the legal guidance given to the commissioners said they were told the event met the criteria for the “widely attended gathering” exception. (The source was not authorized to talk publicly about agency legal discussions.)

Shaub, the former Office of Government Ethics head, disagreed, saying it would be “hard to understand what compelling interest the FCC could think it had in letting its commissioners” attend the gala.

“What possible reason could have outweighed the obvious ethics concerns?” he asked.

Federal rules require written authorization for an official to accept free entry to a widely attended gathering. The FCC did not respond to our requests to provide the authorizations for the Paramount tickets or say who authorized them. Two senior ethics officials at the agency, Kathleen Fulp and Lauren Northrop, did not respond to requests for comment.

While December’s event came at a particularly sensitive time for Paramount and the FCC, it wasn’t the first.

More than a year earlier, in September 2024, Paramount had filed paperwork seeking the commission’s approval for its merger with Skydance Media. A month later, the FCC launched an investigation of CBS after a conservative group complained about a “60 Minutes” interview with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. Trump later filed a lawsuit alleging the network deceptively edited the interview — an accusation CBS denied.

Then in November, less than two weeks after his election victory, Trump declared he would appoint Carr as FCC chair. Almost immediately, Carr accused CBS of biased election coverage and said it would be an obstacle to approving the Paramount-Skydance merger.

That December, Carr and three other commissioners — Rosenworcel, Gomez and Geoffrey Starks — accepted Kennedy Center gala tickets from Paramount worth a combined $48,156.

On Jan. 16, 2025, just days before Rosenworcel stepped down from the commission, she announced the agency was dismissing the election complaint against CBS. She and Gomez called the outcome a victory for the First Amendment.

But days later, Carr, the incoming FCC chair, reopened the investigation.

To resolve Trump’s lawsuit, CBS agreed to pay the president $16 million, a decision criticized by legal experts who decried Trump’s claims as baseless.

Two days after Trump posted on social media that he had received the settlement money, the FCC took up the Paramount-Skydance merger. To meet Carr’s demands, Paramount agreed to appoint an independent ombudsperson who would evaluate claims of bias. The company also pledged to eliminate its diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

By then, Starks and Simington had unexpectedly stepped down from the commission. Trusty, a Trump appointee, had been confirmed by the Senate the previous month.

Trusty and Carr voted in favor of the merger. Gomez voted against, blasting the approval for requiring “never-before-seen forms of government control over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment.”

Experts said that while Trusty had no conflict yet, Carr and Gomez did. The fact that Gomez voted against Paramount did not mean she didn’t face a conflict under the rules, Shaub said.

Federal rules only require those who accept improper gifts to make a prompt reimbursement, but Shaub and the other experts said Carr and Gomez should have abstained from the vote.

“If you repay the face value of the ticket, the gift rules don’t require you to recuse — though common sense and any kind of conscience might lead you to recuse voluntarily for the good of the country,” Shaub said. “But if you refuse to repay the donor, I don’t see how anything short of recusal could remotely remediate the problem.”

With the Paramount-Skydance merger greenlit by the FCC, Ellison, the new company’s CEO, then set his sights on acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery.

Warner at first rebuffed Paramount’s overtures and on Dec. 5 — two days before the Kennedy Center gala — accepted a bid from Netflix to buy its studio and streaming assets. Ellison responded by making numerous calls to administration officials and had a long talk with Trump, according to The Wall Street Journal.

On the night of the gala, Trump told reporters the Netflix deal “could be a problem” and that he planned to get directly involved with the regulatory approval. Inside the Kennedy Center, Carr and his wife sat with Ellison in an exclusive skybox, Bloomberg reported. (Gomez said in her statement to ProPublica that she declined Paramount’s “invitation because of serious concerns about press independence connected to conditions Paramount agreed to as part of its merger transaction before the FCC.”)

Hours after the gala ended, Paramount announced it was launching its hostile takeover bid of Warner Bros. Discovery.

About three months later, Carr publicly endorsed Paramount over Netflix on CNBC, promising swift approval.

If one or more commissioners choose to abstain from a merger vote because of ethical concerns, what would happen next is unclear. Under federal conflict of interest rules, an agency designee could theoretically permit commissioners to vote after considering several factors, including “the difficulty of reassigning the matter,” the nature of the relationship between the commissioners and Paramount, and the “effect that resolution of the matter would have upon the financial interests” of the firm.

Carr could bypass a full commission vote entirely, as he did with the recent acquisition of Tegna by Nexstar Media Group. In that case, Carr delegated authority to FCC staff to approve the takeover.

But any decision on the Paramount deal — whether by the full commission or by staff at the direction of the chair — is likely to be challenged.

Richard Painter, a former White House ethics attorney in the administration of George W. Bush, said while courts often defer to the government’s judgment, they also can become skeptical if a regulatory agency is shown to have violated ethics rules.

“A judge may very well say that the merger decision of the FCC isn’t worth jack because the process was corrupted,” he said.

Filed Under: anna gomez, brendan carr, conflict of interest, david ellison, disclosure, ethics, fcc, jessica rosenworcel, kennedy center, nathan simington, olivia trusty

Companies: paramount

One of the Russian government’s most elite hacking groups has adopted an attack, known as Clickfix, to compromise devices belonging to sensitive organizations in Ukraine, the latter country’s CERT center is warning.

Clickfix has emerged as an effective attack technique that attackers, primarily financially motivated criminals, began using in the last year or so. Websites under the control of the attackers display a CAPTCHA that requires the visitor to copy a jumble of text and paste it into the terminal. The text contains scripts that, once entered, perform malicious actions, typically by installing malware or exfiltrating sensitive data. Ukraine’s CERT said Wednesday that Sandworm, an advanced hacking unit inside the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence arm, is now using the technique.

“GhettoVibe,” “ScoutCurl,” and many more

The Clickfix attacks began in the spring and have continued through the summer. The campaign has resulted in the network compromise of at least one organization when a connected device was found to be infected by FreakyPoll, the name of one of Sandworm’s custom malware packages. Ukrainian authorities discovered 10 compromised websites that displayed a PowerShell command as part of a fake CAPTCHA that said it had to be passed to ensure a real human was behind the visiting device’s keyboard.

Once the user entered the script, it could install malicious Visual Basic scripts and other malicious wares that went on to install a variety of Sandworm malware. Typically, the first malware to run was a reconnaissance program that gathered information from the infected device. Machines deemed important would then receive follow-on malware that backdoored the system.

“The command, as an example, could be intended to load and save a VBS file in the Startup directory,” a translated version of Tuesday’s advisory stated. “One of the variants of such a program was called GHETTOVIBE. At the next stage, in order to determine the importance of the cyberattack object, the SCOUTCURL software tool can be loaded onto the attacked computer, which is a PowerShell script that performs basic reconnaissance by collecting and exfiltrating information about the computer: basic characteristics, programs, files, Internet browser data, etc.”

Roblox has officially added support for the Hindi language to its platform, thus becoming even more user-friendly for millions of players in India. The newly added language option is now available to all Roblox users on the website, in the Creator Hub, and in Roblox Studio. With this update, the platform should become even more accessible to millions of Hindi-speaking people.

Enable Hindi on Roblox

1. Open the Roblox app.
2. Click on Settings from the menu.
3. Select Account Info.
4. Choose the Language option.
5. Click Hindi and save your changes.

Roblox supports Hindi translations for game names, descriptions, in-game text, and game products. This helps creators create content for the Hindi-speaking community on Roblox. Commenting on the announcement, Sunil Rao said Roblox sees India as an important market for future growth. He noted that the company will continue expanding its localization efforts. “Roblox thrives on connection, and language shouldn’t be a barrier to creativity.”

Hindi SEO Support Makes Roblox Content Easier to Find

Hindi SEO support is another recent addition made by Roblox. This update makes indexing Hindi content on the site through search engines easier. It will help users locate Roblox content using Hindi queries.

Roblox has confirmed that more Hindi features will arrive in future updates. The company will be adding a feature called Hindi Chat Translator to its game. This feature will help communicate with people from other regions who speak other languages. It will make conversations easier for both parties during game time and other activities. The company sees this as another step toward building a more inclusive user experience.

Nintendo brought Virtual Boy games to Switch and Switch 2 owners through its online service earlier this year. The collection lets players experience the red-tinted stereoscopic titles without digging out the original bulky headset. Yet something important stayed missing from the official offering. The service provides no dedicated controller, and standard Switch pads force awkward compromises that dull the precision the old hardware once delivered.

The original Virtual Boy controller is one of Nintendo’s most eye-catching designs from the 1990s, and there are still quite a few floating around. Anyone who has used the peripheral on its stand will recognize the two large grips protruding from the body. One directional pad is on the left, while another is on the right. The red A and B buttons cluster next to the right pad, while the grey Start and Select buttons hang around near the left one. Plus, the rounded L and R triggers are quite distinct. Some games used to use a dual-pad layout to create the illusion of depth in what was otherwise a beautiful 2D environment, but when you translate all of that to a current analog stick or single pad, you end up with dead zones or jittery responses that really mess up the vibe.

Nintendo Switch 2: Choose Your Game Bundle

• Kick off the fun with a Nintendo Switch 2 system, your choice of a select digital game, and a savings* of up to $29.99!
• Includes choice of either the Mario Kart World, Donkey Kong Bananza, or Pokémon Pokopia digital game download
• One system, three play modes: TV, Tabletop, and Handheld

RetroOnyx’s new circuit board is game-changing. This board can be inserted directly into an original Virtual Boy controller and replaces almost everything inside it. The ESP32 microcontroller is at the heart of it all, handling all wireless communications and button translation. What about the remaining original hardware? Nothing gets affected. The controller case itself has not been touched; there are no permanent cuts or new holes. It is entirely possible to revert this thing to its original state.

Installing this new board only involves a few simple tools and some soldering. Screw the shell open, remove the old board after you’ve added some new solder points to the battery terminals, and that’s all. The new board is installed with the power switch matched up with the existing slider and a small 3D printed plug that sends a light pipe into the old cable exit hole. Nothing really complicated. After that, reassembly takes only a few minutes if you’ve positioned the board correctly, and the result? Every physical button and pad remains in its factory position and spacing.

On a Switch or Switch 2, the upgraded controller appears as a normal Pro Controller. Pairing is a typical Bluetooth procedure; just follow the usual steps. A simple button push at power-on allows you to select the operating mode; the default is Virtual Boy on Nintendo Switch online, but you may hold the button for a second to switch to PC use or some experimental mappings that resemble vintage SNES or N64 layouts. Once you’ve paired everything up, the left directional pad appears as the left pad on the Switch side, while the right directional pad appears as the right analog stick. Face buttons swap over in a fairly straightforward manner to preserve muscle memory, and L and R triggers simply map to their modern counterparts as is.

Additional button combinations will enable a host of features that the Switch is actually anticipating. Holding specific buttons on the controller will access the home menu, increase the volume, modify the brightness on the emulated display, initiate a rewind (if supported), or even start a capture. The ESP32 handles all of these commands on its own, with no additional software required on the console, and best of all, the latency is low enough that the games feel extremely responsive. Most gamers agree that after you get past the first few minutes of adjusting, the entire experience feels very natural.

The same hardware breathes new life into the original Virtual Boy system, but this time wirelessly. All you need is a separate BlueRetro adapter that fits into the console’s controller port and pairs with the improved controller. As a result, depending on which of the two receivers is nearby, one controller can now serve as hardware for both the original 1995 system and the current Nintendo products. However, if Nintendo decides to enable haptic rumble on the Virtual Boy collection, subsequent updates may include haptic modules inside the grips.

RetroOnyx sells the board as a kit for $99, but you must provide your own donor controller and battery pack. They’ll occasionally have assembled versions available if they can find secondhand controllers. This project is actually pretty cool, because it fills a gap that Nintendo left open when they released all those games without any accompanying hardware, and it demonstrates how far a well-designed replacement board can extend the life of a really cool, but otherwise largely forgotten peripheral that would otherwise collect dust on a shelf.

Moonshot announced a $2bn raise at $12bn valuation in May.

China is showcasing its AI prowess despite efforts by Washington, as Moonshot AI’s new Kimi K3 boasts a performance close to OpenAI and Anthropic’s latest models.

At 2.8trn parametres, Kimi K3 is the largest open-weight AI model available in the market today. The multimodal model is designed for frontier intelligence across long-horizon coding, knowledge work and reasoning.

Across benchmarks, K3 only trails behind OpenAI’s newest GPT-5.6 Sol and Anthropic’s Fable 5, while outperforming them in some coding and general agent tasks. The company said that K3 performed “competitively” with Fable 5 and “substantially outperformed” Opus-4.8, GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-5.5.

K3 is also the cheapest of the three, at around $0.94 per Artificial Analysis intelligence index task and $15 per million output tokens, while GPT-5.6 Sol max costs around $1.04 and Claude Fable 5 makes a significant leap to around $2.75 per task.

Although cheaper than the American juggernauts, Moonshot’s new model marks a major leap in price compared to its Chinese contemporaries. DeepSeek’s V4 Pro costs around $0.04 per index task according to Artificial Analysis rankings, while MiniMax’s M3 costs around $0.12 for the same.

Moonshot unveiled its new model just months after announcing a $2bn raise from Chinese food delivery company Meituan’s VC arm Long-Z Investments, alongside Shuimu Capital, China Mobile and CPE Yuanfeng. The May round valued the start-up at around $20bn.

The launch marks the latest in escalating tensions between US and China over AI leadership. US curbs on semiconductor exports to China over recent years has pushed China to focus on its own chip capabilities, with Moonshot AI president Yutong Zhang telling the audience at the World Economic Forum earlier this year: “We knew we didn’t have the luxury to simply scale up compute…That forced us to focus on fundamental research and efficiency.”

The US is taking a more restrictive approach to sharing advanced home-grown AI models by only allowing approved bodies to access GPT-5.6, Fable and Mythos – much to OpenAI’s disappointment.

Lawmakers from the country, meanwhile, are also urging the Trump administration to ban US companies from buying memory chips from Chinese semiconductor developers.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

I’ve uncovered a pretty cool way to save almost $400 off a ThinkPad by combining two separate promo codes.

Right now, you can get the Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 AMD for $1,324.39 (was $1719) at Lenovo. The laptop is already discounted down to $1,471.55. But then, enter coupon code THINKWEEKEND, which saves you $77.45, and code LENOVO10DEAL to save an extra $147.16. That’s almost $400 off one of our top-rated business laptops.

I don’t know how long this loophole will last though, so use them while you can. Better still, you can run this coupon combo across a range of other laptops and desktops, too.

Business laptops can sometimes blur together, but Lenovo‘s ThinkPad range has always stood out for me, earning its reputation by focusing on reliability, security, and practical features that make everyday work easier.

Powered by AMD‘s Ryzen 5 PRO 230 processor, the ThinkPad T14 has more than enough performance for office work, web browsing, video meetings, spreadsheets, and multitasking.

You get 16GB of DDR5 memory and a 512GB PCIe Gen4 SSD, as well as a fingerprint reader for fast sign-ins, a 5MP RGB and IR webcam, a physical privacy shutter, and Windows 11 Pro, making it well suited to business tasks.

The 14-inch WUXGA IPS display has a 1920 x 1200 resolution with an anti-glare finish and 400 nits of brightness, making it easier to work in bright offices or while traveling on a train or plane.

A backlit keyboard, integrated Radeon 760M graphics, Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth 5.4 round out modern specifications that mean the laptop should continue to be perfectly fine for many years.

Although Lenovo markets the ThinkPad T14 primarily toward professionals and small businesses, it also makes plenty of sense for students and anyone wanting a durable, lightweight laptop that puts productivity ahead of flashy, but entirely unnecessary, extras.

If you need a dependable laptop that can handle almost anything you throw at it, these combined discounts make the ThinkPad T14 Gen 7 AMD an easy recommendation.

For more top-performers, see our guide to the best business laptop. And for more savings, see our round-up of the best business laptop deals around right now.

Also consider: More ThinkPad deals

AI is reshaping tech careers. But it will not kill off the value of a STEM degree, according to Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis.

He made the comments at a London business conference, in a video published on Wednesday. Knowing the fundamentals of software gives you an edge with AI, he told the audience, Business Insider reported.

“You absolutely needed to lean into STEM and computer science,” Hassabis said. He framed AI as the next programming language, after machine code, C and Python. The future, he suggested, may be plain English.

Fundamentals still matter

Even so, the basics do not go away. “You’re still going to need to know about architecting things and best software engineering practices,” he said.

“Those people who understand the deep technical, they’ll be able to use these tools 10 times more effectively than people who don’t have that technical knowledge,” Hassabis added.

He also made a case for the humanities. “The time is now for the humanities like philosophy, economics,” he said. “I think we really need them in the world we’re about to enter.”

A wider pushback on vibe coding

Hassabis is one of several tech leaders pushing back on the idea that vibe coding makes coding degrees pointless.

Geoffrey Hinton, often called the godfather of AI, made a similar case to Business Insider in December. A mid-level programming job “is not going to be a career for much longer, because AI can do that,” he said. But he argued a computer science degree is worth far more than coding. It will stay useful “for quite a long time,” he said.

Affirm chief Max Levchin has said much the same. Computer science fundamentals separate good code from “garbage,” he argued on a podcast. Microsoft’s Brad Smith and others have offered similar reassurance to anxious graduates.

OpenAI’s Sora may have shut down, but Google apparently thinks there’s still interest in a tool that lets you star in your own AI videos. On Thursday, the tech giant announced an update to Google Vids that will allow you to create a custom digital avatar that looks and sounds like you based on a selfie and a voice recording you upload.

In addition, Google said it’s bringing its multi-modal AI model Gemini Omni to Vids, letting you create videos using a combination of a written prompt and reference images you upload. Omni then mixes those inputs together to create the AI video you want. It can also be used to do things like swap out the background or fix the lighting in a video recorded on your phone, or add effects.

Plus, Omni now supports step-by-step edits, meaning you can make changes to your video as you go instead of starting over from scratch.

The updates push Google Vids beyond its original role as an AI-assisted workplace presentation tool to become more of an all-in-one video creation platform. By making Vids a part of Google Workspace, the company is telegraphing its use as a business tool for things like company updates or training videos, but personalized avatars and conversational edits could put it in closer competition with other AI video startups and tools like HeyGen, Synthesia, Captions, D-ID, and others.

Google notes that the new AI avatars will be tied to the account holder’s likeness, tied to their Google account, and watermarked invisibly with SynthID. (I suppose that means no one will be using the tool to make bizarre AI videos of Google CEO Sundar Pichai, the way that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had let users do with Sora when it was available!)

The company also says that access to personal avatars is limited to users in certain regions who are aged 18 or older.

Ryan Beiermeister has joined Founders Fund as a partner, she announced on Monday. Beiermeister is well-known in Silicon Valley for a number of reasons. For one, prior to this role, she spent about two years as VP of Product Policy at OpenAI as it became a household name, shortly after ChatGPT became the fastest-growing app in history.

That career choice ended abruptly in February when she was reportedly fired after objecting to a planned ChatGPT feature called “adult mode,” which was going to allow adults to use the chatbot for erotica. The Wall Street Journal reported that her firing involved an accusation by a male colleague of sexual discrimination, although Beiermeister called any allegation that she discriminated against anyone “absolutely false.” In March, OpenAI reportedly scrapped plans for adult mode.

More recently, Beiermeister has become well-known in Silicon Valley for her skillful strategy in a Founders Fund YouTube show called “Mafia.” The game involves discovering which players are secret Mafia killers before those players can “kill” the rest of the players.

Beiermeister played the game against OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anduril’s Palmer Luckey, Figma’s Dylan Field, Flexport’s Ryan Petersen, Founders Fund’s Trae Stephens, and several others.

One of the most intense scenes in Episode One involved her and Altman each saying that if they were found dead, it would mean the other was the killer. Those who knew the history laughed.

Some commented on Twitter that maybe the whole Mafia game was really a job interview for her. The game, according to the firm’s chief marketing officer and the game’s MC, Mike Solana (who brought the game to the firm), is often played at Founders Fund retreats.

However, it wasn’t. “Though she is an excellent Mafia player, that wasn’t part of her interview process. She has been close with Trae Stephens since they worked together at Palantir and has been friendly with our team for years,” a Founders Fund spokesperson told TechCrunch.

Though the way Beiermeister played the game — coolly, making analytical observations and arguments about who might be Mafia — couldn’t have hurt her prospects.

Still, Beiermeister has known Trae Stephens for at least a decade. Prior to her role at OpenAI, and at Meta before that, she spent her formative years at Palantir, the big data company founded by the VC firm’s founder, Peter Thiel. Stephens also worked at Palantir in its early days.

Beiermeister says she’s most interested in backing the kinds of startups that Founders Fund is known to gravitate toward.

“The companies that will define the next twenty years are being built in the categories where product engineering is hardest and the stakes are highest — AI infrastructure and agentic systems, defense, energy, climate, biotech, the regulated frontier,” she wrote in a LinkedIn post. “To the founders in these domains, especially if you don’t fit the standard mold: I want to talk to you and my inbox is open.”

• HP India has been fined 1.42 billion rupees ($14.7 million) for two separate cases
• Self-reporting ultimately landed it with lighter fines
• Both cases relate to government tender manipulation between 2017 and 2020

India’s Competition Commission (CCI) has accused HP India and some related resellers of coordinating bids for Indian government contracts on the Government e-Marketplace.

According to the CCI, the company and certain partners manipulated government tenders by predetermined or communicated bid prices, submitting deliberately uncompetitive bids to create the appearance of competition and controlling discounts.