A growing number of bars and restaurants across the United States are embracing a phone-free experience, reflecting a broader cultural shift toward reducing screen time and encouraging real-world connection. From upscale supper clubs to neighborhood cocktail bars, establishments are introducing policies that either restrict phone usage or actively incentivize guests to put their devices away.

At the heart of this trend is a rising awareness of the negative effects smartphones and social media can have on attention, memory, and interpersonal relationships. Studies continue to highlight how constant digital engagement impacts learning, socialization, and even self-esteem. With Americans reportedly checking their phones around 144 times a day and spending nearly 4.5 hours on their devices, the pushback against screen dependency is gaining traction.

Younger generations, particularly Gen Z, are leading this shift

Surveys indicate that a significant portion of them intentionally disconnect from their devices, followed by millennials and older age groups. This growing appetite for “analog” experiences is now influencing the hospitality industry in noticeable ways.

Restaurants and bars in at least 11 U.S. states have already introduced some form of phone restriction. Washington, D.C., currently leads with the highest number of such venues. Some establishments take a strict approach, such as locking phones away in secure pouches for the duration of a visit, while others offer softer incentives like free desserts for diners who keep their devices off the table.

The reasoning behind these policies is simple: removing phones enhances human interaction. Business owners and industry experts argue that without digital distractions, guests are more engaged with their company, their surroundings, and even their food. Chefs have also noted that phones can detract from the dining experience, making meals feel less memorable.

For customers, the impact can be surprisingly profound

Many report feeling more present and emotionally connected during phone-free outings. Experiences that might otherwise be fragmented by notifications become more immersive and meaningful.

Looking ahead, the trend is expected to expand beyond independent venues. As digital fatigue continues to grow and awareness of screen-time effects increases, more mainstream chains and public spaces may experiment with similar policies. While not everyone may be ready to give up their phones during a night out, the rise of phone-free dining suggests a clear shift: people are beginning to value presence over perpetual connectivity.

Restaurants are finally pushing back against the constant glow of screens at the table, and honestly, it feels long overdue. Dining out was never meant to compete with notifications and endless scrolling. By nudging people to put their phones away, these places are restoring something we’ve quietly lost – real conversation, attention, and presence. It may feel restrictive at first, but the payoff is a far more meaningful experience.

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.

Today’s Connections: Sports Edition is a tough one. If you’re struggling with it but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.

Read more: NYT Connections: Sports Edition Puzzle Comes Out of Beta

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.

Yellow group hint: City of Angels.

Green group hint: Winter football.

Blue group hint: Like Hemsworth, but in hoops.

Purple group hint: Cinderellas.

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: A Los Angeles athlete.

Green group: College football bowl games.

Blue group: Basketball Chrises.

Purple group: Men’s NCAA tournament 16-seeds.

Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is a Los Angeles athlete. The four answers are Clipper, King, Ram and Spark.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is college football bowl games. The four answers are Fiesta, Orange, Rose and Sugar.

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is basketball Chrises. The four answers are Bosh, Mullin, Paul and Webber.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is men’s NCAA tournament 16-seeds. The four answers are Howard, Long Island, Prairie View A&M and Siena.

Samsung could be preparing to shake up its audio lineup with a radically different kind of earbuds – ones that don’t even rely on your ear canal. According to recent leaks, the company is working on a new product, possibly called “Galaxy Buds Able,” and early signs suggest these could use bone conduction technology instead of traditional speaker drivers.

Multiple leaks and certifications, including a recent appearance on India’s BIS database, indicate that the product is actively in development. While details remain limited, the unusual model numbering and repeated references across sources hint that this isn’t just another incremental Galaxy Buds refresh, but potentially an entirely new category.

Bone conduction audio works very differently from conventional earbuds

Instead of pushing sound waves through your ear canal, it sends vibrations through your skull directly to the inner ear, effectively bypassing the eardrum. This allows for an open-ear design, meaning users can still hear their surroundings while listening to audio—something traditional in-ear or noise-canceling earbuds often block out.

That shift matters more than it might seem. As wearable tech evolves, companies are increasingly looking at ways to blend digital experiences with real-world awareness. Bone conduction could make earbuds safer for outdoor use, more comfortable for long sessions, and even more accessible for users who struggle with in-ear designs. It also opens doors for new health and assistive applications, especially when combined with Samsung’s growing interest in wellness-focused audio features.

For users, the appeal is straightforward. Imagine listening to music, taking calls, or interacting with voice assistants without isolating yourself from your environment. Whether you’re commuting, working out, or just walking through a busy street, this kind of tech promises a more natural and less intrusive experience.

Looking ahead, timing could be key

Reports suggest Samsung may be positioning these earbuds for a major launch alongside its next-generation foldables, such as the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Flip 8. If that happens, the “Buds Able” could represent the company’s push into more experimental, next-gen hardware – going beyond iterative upgrades and into entirely new user experiences.

While nothing is official yet, the direction is clear: Samsung isn’t just refining earbuds anymore – it may be redefining how we hear them.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.

Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? I must say, 6-Across really stumped me, but I get it now. Read on for all the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.

Mini across clues and answers

1A clue: Transfusion cocktail = ___, ginger ale, grape juice and lime
Answer: VODKA

6A clue: Body guard?
Answer: APRON

7A clue: Temporary Instagram update
Answer: STORY

8A clue: Big name in hiking sandals
Answer: TEVA

9A clue: TV room
Answer: DEN

Mini down clues and answers

1D clue: Reaching far and wide
Answer: VAST

2D clue: Chose
Answer: OPTED

3D clue: Went by car
Answer: DROVE

4D clue: Book in a mosque, using a non-standard spelling
Answer: KORAN

5D clue: “Got ___ bright ideas?”
Answer: ANY

The Philips Hue Omniglow is the best Hue lightstrip yet. It’s a classier kind of LED strip: where other models have visible LEDs, the Omniglow delivers seamless color gradients and smoothly moving light effects. The results are very impressive and the Hue app makes it easy to select, edit or create scenes either solo or as part of a wider Hue setup. If you’ve already got a Hue system you can add it in seconds and then include it in your scenes and automations. As with other Hue lights you’ll need a Philips Hue Bridge or Bridge Pro to access advanced features such as custom scenes and smart home integration.

The Omniglow is easy to install and set up, although if you’re mounting it up high you might curse the short power cable. The only real downside is the length: you can shorten the Omniglow but not extend it, and longer versions are not widely available in the UK or US. While European customers can choose between 3m, 5m and 10m models, the US and UK are currently limited to the 3m model only.

Philips Hue Omniglow: price and availability

In short: Every time you visit LinkedIn in a Chrome-based browser, a hidden JavaScript routine silently probes your browser for more than 6,000 installed extensions, collects 48 hardware and software characteristics about your device, encrypts the resulting fingerprint, and attaches it to every API request you make during your session. The practice, labelled “BrowserGate” by researchers, is not disclosed in LinkedIn’s privacy policy. LinkedIn says it is a security measure; critics say it is covert surveillance of a billion users’ browsing behaviour at industrial scale.

There is a routine that runs on your computer every time you open LinkedIn. You cannot see it, you were not told about it, and it is not described in the company’s privacy policy. According to an investigation published in early April 2026 by Fairlinked e.V., a European association of commercial LinkedIn users, the platform injects a 2.7-megabyte JavaScript bundle into its website that silently scans visitors’ browsers for the presence of more than 6,000 specific Chrome extensions, assembles a detailed fingerprint of their hardware, encrypts it, and transmits the result to LinkedIn’s servers, where it is attached to every subsequent action taken during the session.

The investigation, independently confirmed by BleepingComputer, which verified the scanning behaviour through its own testing, has been dubbed “BrowserGate.” LinkedIn disputes many of the report’s characterisations. The technical facts are not in dispute.

What the script does

LinkedIn calls its scanning system “Spectroscopy.” When a user loads the LinkedIn website, the script fires off up to 6,222 simultaneous requests, each one probing for a specific browser extension by attempting to access files associated with that extension’s ID. The presence or absence of a file in the response indicates whether the extension is installed. The entire operation runs silently in the background, without a visible prompt or notification of any kind.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Beyond extensions, the script collects 48 distinct characteristics of the user’s device: CPU core count, available memory, screen resolution, timezone, language settings, battery status, audio hardware information, and storage capacity, among others. Individually, these attributes are unremarkable. Combined, they form a device fingerprint specific enough to identify a user even after cookies are cleared.

Once compiled, the data is serialised to JSON and encrypted using an RSA public key, LinkedIn’s internal identifier for the key is “apfcDfPK”,  before being transmitted to telemetry endpoints including li/track and /platform-telemetry/li/apfcDf. The fingerprint is then permanently injected as an HTTP header into every API request made during the session, meaning LinkedIn receives it with every search, every profile view, every message sent.

What it is looking for

The question of which extensions LinkedIn is scanning for makes the surveillance more sensitive than simple fraud detection would require. According to the BrowserGate report, LinkedIn’s list includes more than 200 products that compete directly with its own sales tools, among them Apollo, Lusha, and ZoomInfo. Because LinkedIn knows the employer of each registered user, systematically scanning for the presence of a competitor’s tool gives the platform visibility into which companies are evaluating or deploying rival products.

The list also reportedly includes tools associated with neurodivergent conditions, religious practice, political interests, and job-hunting activity, categories that, in the European Union, qualify as sensitive personal data subject to heightened protection under the General Data Protection Regulation. Knowing that a user is running a job-search extension, for instance, is a meaningful inference about their employment intentions, drawn without consent.

The scale of the operation has grown substantially over time. LinkedIn began scanning for 38 specific extensions in 2017. By 2024, that number had grown to 461. By February 2026, the list had reached 6,167, a 1,252% increase in two years. BleepingComputer’s testing confirmed the scanning was active as of early April 2026.

LinkedIn’s defence and the source of the report

LinkedIn’s response to BleepingComputer was pointed. “The claims made on the website linked here are plain wrong,” a spokesperson said. “The person behind them is subject to an account restriction for scraping and other violations of LinkedIn’s Terms of Service. To protect the privacy of our members, their data, and to ensure site stability, we do look for extensions that scrape data without members’ consent or otherwise violate LinkedIn’s Terms of Service.” The company added that it does not use the data to “infer sensitive information about members.”

The platform’s characterisation of the source matters. Fairlinked e.V. is connected to Teamfluence Signal Systems OÜ, an Estonian company whose managing directors include Steven Morell and Jan Liebling. Teamfluence makes a Chrome extension, also called Teamfluence, that LinkedIn restricted for alleged terms of service violations. The company subsequently filed a preliminary injunction against LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company and LinkedIn Germany GmbH at the Regional Court of Munich, alleging violations of the Digital Markets Act, EU competition law, and German data protection rules. In January 2026, the Munich court denied the injunction, finding that LinkedIn’s actions did not constitute unlawful obstruction or discrimination.

The financial dispute between the parties does not change the technical findings, which were verified independently. It does mean the framing of those findings is contested, and readers should weigh both the substance of the claim and its provenance.

The regulatory backdrop

This is not LinkedIn’s first serious encounter with European data protection enforcement. In October 2024, the Irish Data Protection Commission, which regulates LinkedIn in the EU through its Irish subsidiary, fined the company €310 million, approximately $334 million , for processing users’ personal data for targeted advertising without a valid legal basis. The decision found that LinkedIn’s consent mechanisms did not meet GDPR’s requirement that consent be “freely given.” LinkedIn was ordered to bring its data processing into compliance.

The BrowserGate investigation drops into that context. The legal question of whether scanning for 6,000 browser extensions constitutes processing of special-category personal data, and whether users’ lack of awareness of the practice renders any implied consent invalid,  is exactly the kind of question the Irish Data Protection Commission has already shown it is willing to adjoin in court. Europe’s evolving digital regulation framework has been moving steadily toward requiring explicit disclosure of all significant data collection, and a scanning operation of this scale, conducted without any mention in a privacy policy, appears difficult to square with that direction of travel.

LinkedIn is a Microsoft subsidiary, acquired in 2016 for $26.2 billion. Microsoft has been aggressively expanding its AI capabilities in 2026, with LinkedIn’s vast dataset of professional identity and employment history forming a significant part of the data infrastructure on which those capabilities rest. The relationship between LinkedIn’s data collection practices and Microsoft’s broader AI ambitions is not addressed in LinkedIn’s privacy policy either.

What this means for users

LinkedIn has more than one billion registered users. The majority access the platform through Chrome-based browsers, meaning the Spectroscopy scan runs routinely on the devices of a significant fraction of the global professional workforce, collecting a fingerprint that is precise enough to persist across cookie resets and potentially across devices.

Short of using a non-Chromium browser such as Firefox, which would limit but not necessarily eliminate LinkedIn’s fingerprinting capabilities, there is no user-facing setting that prevents the scanning. The platform does not offer an opt-out, because it does not disclose the practice in the first place. The 2026 push for governed and transparent AI and data practices is built on precisely the premise that invisible data collection of this kind should not be the default.

Whether regulators move quickly enough to change that default at LinkedIn’s scale remains to be seen. Security firms increasingly built to detect exactly this kind of covert data harvesting are becoming a growth sector in their own right, a market indicator that the gap between what platforms collect and what users understand is still very wide. The year 2025 normalised AI-powered data collection at a pace that regulation has yet to match. BrowserGate is a case study in what that lag looks like from the inside of a browser.

In short: AI-powered “vibe coding” tools have driven an 84% jump in new app submissions to Apple’s App Store in a single quarter, according to reporting by The Information, the largest surge in a decade. The flood is straining Apple’s review infrastructure, with approval times ballooning from 24 hours to as many as 30 days. Apple has responded by pulling apps that violate its self-containment rules, triggering a standoff with the platforms fuelling the boom.

Apple’s App Store is receiving more new apps than at any point in the past ten years. The cause is not a wave of professional developers: it is a term that Collins English Dictionary named its word of the year for 2025, coined by Andrej Karpathy, a co-founder of OpenAI and former AI lead at Tesla, in a single social media post in February of that year. Vibe coding ,the practice of building software by describing what you want in plain language and letting a large language model write the code, has lowered the barrier to app development so dramatically that it is now overwhelming the infrastructure Apple built to gatekeep its platform.

According to reporting by The Information, the number of new apps submitted to the App Store rose 84% in a single quarter as vibe coding went mainstream. The figure corroborates broader data from Sensor Tower, which tracked a 56% year-on-year spike in iOS app launches in December 2025 and a 54.8% rise in January 2026, the highest growth rates in four years. Apple’s full-year 2025 total reached 557,000 new app submissions, the largest annual wave since 2016.

The tools behind the flood

The surge is attributable to a small cluster of platforms that have turned natural language into deployable software. Cursor, made by Anysphere and used by seven million developers, surpassed $2 billion in annualised revenue in March 2026 and was valued at $29.3 billion after a $2.3 billion funding round co-led by Accel and Coatue in November 2025. Lovable, which targets non-technical builders, reached $200 million in annualised revenue in late 2025, a fiftyfold increase in a single year, and raised $330 million in a Series B at a $6.6 billion valuation in December 2025. Replit generated $240 million in revenue during 2025, serves more than 150,000 paying customers, and is targeting $1 billion in revenue for 2026. Bolt.new has become a popular entry point for rapid idea-to-prototype work.

The commercial argument for these platforms is straightforward: anyone with an idea and an internet connection can now build and submit an app. The problem for Apple is that the same dynamic that makes vibe coding commercially compelling is structurally incompatible with how the App Store review process works.

Why Apple has a structural problem

Vibe coding’s power lies in generating and executing new code on demand,  in response to user prompts, in real time, without a fixed codebase. Apple’s App Store review process was designed for a different model: a developer submits a static build, Apple reviews it, and the approved build is what users receive. Guideline 2.5.2 of Apple’s App Review Guidelines states explicitly that apps “may not download, install, or execute code which introduces or changes features or functionality of the app.” Vibe coding apps, almost by definition, do exactly that.

The volume consequences are already visible in Apple’s infrastructure. Developers submitting to the App Store in March 2026 reported review delays of seven to 30 or more days, against a historical baseline of 24 to 48 hours,  with the majority of delay time spent in the “Waiting for Review” queue before a reviewer picks up the submission. The flood of AI-generated apps is straining a system designed for a world in which building an app took months, not minutes.

The crackdown begins

Apple’s enforcement response has been progressive and, at times, opaque. In mid-March 2026, reports emerged that Apple had quietly blocked updates for a set of vibe coding apps, including Replit and Vibecode,  without public explanation. Developers described receiving rejections citing Guideline 2.5.2 but receiving no advance warning that enforcement was intensifying.

The most prominent casualty was Anything, an app that let users build small tools and automations through natural language prompts. Its co-founder, Dhruv Amin, said Apple had been preventing updates since December 2025 before pulling the app entirely on 30 March 2026. Amin attempted to reach a compromise by modifying the app so that vibe-coded outputs would be previewed in a web browser rather than executed inside the app itself; Apple blocked that update and removed the app regardless.

An Apple spokesperson told The Information that the company was not targeting vibe coding as a category but rather enforcing guidelines that prevent apps from changing their behaviour after review. The distinction, in practice, is narrow: the defining capability of a vibe coding app is its ability to generate and run new functionality on demand, which is precisely what Guideline 2.5.2 prohibits.

The counterargument

Critics of Apple’s position have been pointed. A CNBC column published at the end of March 2026 argued that Apple’s crackdown “puts it on the wrong side of history,” contending that the review-based model was conceived for a world that no longer exists and that blocking vibe coding apps disadvantages the platform against Android, which applies fewer constraints on dynamic code execution.

The deeper tension is one of gatekeeping economics. Apple’s App Store review process is not only a safety mechanism: it is the basis of the 15–30% commission the company collects on in-app purchases and subscriptions. A wave of vibe-coded apps that bypass review , by generating code outside the approved bundle, is also, in structural terms, a challenge to the business logic of the store itself. Regulators in Europe have been scrutinising Apple’s App Store gatekeeping under the Digital Markets Act, and the vibe coding dispute adds another dimension to that ongoing examination.

A platform reckoning

What vibe coding has exposed is a mismatch between the speed at which AI can generate software and the speed at which existing review infrastructure can evaluate it. Apple reviewed roughly 200,000 weekly app submissions at the height of its 2025 volume, and the surge has outpaced that capacity. The platform now faces a choice between expanding its review capacity significantly, updating its guidelines to accommodate dynamic code execution in controlled ways, or continuing to enforce existing rules and accepting the friction that creates with a rapidly growing class of developers.

The capital being deployed into AI infrastructure in 2026 makes it unlikely that the volume of vibe-coded apps will slow on its own. The tools are becoming faster and cheaper; the category is producing some of the highest-growth companies in the technology industry. As AI moves from novelty to commercial infrastructure, the question of who controls the distribution layer,  and on what terms, is becoming the central battleground of the platform era. Apple built the App Store as an answer to that question. Vibe coding is making it ask the question again from the beginning. The AI acceleration of 2025 has arrived at the gate. Apple is deciding whether to open it.