The best free legal streaming services in 2026 include Tubi, Pluto TV, Plex, The Roku Channel, Sling Freestream, Xumo Play, YouTube’s Free Primetime catalog, Kanopy, Hoopla, and PBS. The right choice depends on your country and whether you want on-demand movies, scheduled live channels, library-supported access, or public-service programming.

Best Free Legal Streaming Services at a Glance

Most legal free streaming uses one of three funding models. Ad-supported video on demand, often shortened to AVOD, lets you choose a title and watch it with advertising. Free ad-supported streaming television, or FAST, uses scheduled channels that behave more like traditional television. Library-supported services are funded through participating institutions rather than a personal entertainment subscription.

The comparison below focuses on the core free offering rather than optional paid upgrades. Exact catalogs can change as licensing agreements change.

How These Services Were Selected

Each service in this list had to meet four basic requirements: an official, verifiable service had to exist in September 2026; the core recommendation had to be available without a mandatory recurring entertainment subscription; its free access model had to be supported by the provider’s own documentation; and it needed either a broad catalog or a clearly distinct use case.

That excludes free trials because they become paid subscriptions after a temporary period. It also excludes unofficial streaming mirrors and stale brand names whose current status cannot be verified. Catalog size alone was not used as a ranking method because providers count channels and titles differently and those totals change frequently.

If a free site asks you to install unknown players, bypass security warnings, or download unfamiliar apps, streaming-site safety depends on more than whether the video itself costs money.

How to Find One Specific Movie or Show for Free

A service comparison is less useful when you already know the exact movie or television series you want. Licensing changes frequently, so a title that is free on one provider today can move, become paid, or disappear later.

JustWatch is useful as a discovery tool rather than another streaming-service recommendation. According to JustWatch’s current service description, its free guide shows legal offers across subscription services, free streaming, ad-supported streaming, rentals, and purchases.

Choose the correct country, search for the title, and filter the results for free or ad-supported options. Then verify the offer on the destination service before watching because streaming rights can change.

A fuller workflow for finding where a particular movie or TV show is streaming can also help distinguish free access from rentals, purchases, and subscriptions when several offers appear together.

JustWatch’s own streaming product should not be confused with the guide itself. JustWatch TV was still being presented as a beta product ahead of a planned October 2026 full launch when this article was researched, so it is not treated as one of the established core services above.

The main trade-off in free streaming is not simply ads versus no ads. Geography, library eligibility, live versus on-demand viewing, account requirements, and catalog stability matter just as much. Understanding what free streaming gives up compared with paid streaming can help determine whether a free service is enough for your viewing habits.

Google has released the September 2026 security patches to address 110 vulnerabilities affecting its Pixel devices, including one zero-day flaw actively exploited in targeted attacks.

“There are indications that CVE-2026-58704 may be under limited, targeted exploitation,” the company warned on Wednesday.

“All supported Google devices will receive an update to the 2026-09-05 patch level. We encourage all customers to accept these updates to their devices.”

This high-severity security flaw stems from improper authorization and protection mechanism failure weaknesses affecting the Modem subcomponent. Successful exploitation can allow attackers with access to an adjacent network and basic privileges on the targeted device to escalate privileges in low-complexity attacks that don’t require user interaction.

“In Cellular Modem, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code,” a security advisory issued today says. “This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed.”

Google tagged 109 other security issues in this month’s Pixel update bulletin, including 12 remote code execution and 89 privilege escalation vulnerabilities rated critical or high severity.

Although Google Pixel devices also run Android, they receive separate security updates and bug fixes from the standard monthly patches distributed to Android OEMs because of the unique hardware platform Google controls directly and its exclusive features and capabilities.

To apply this month’s security updates, Pixel users must go to Settings > Security & privacy > System & updates > Security update, tap Install, and restart their devices to complete the update process.

You can find more information on the September 2026 updates for Pixel devices in the security bulletin for Google’s smartphone range.

In June, Google also addressed an Android Framework zero-day flaw (CVE-2025-48595) that was actively exploited in targeted attacks and could let attackers gain code execution and escalate privileges on devices running Android 14 or later.

One month earlier, the company announced an overhaul of its Android and Chrome vulnerability rewards programs, scaling back payouts for flaws that are easier to find using artificial intelligence (AI) while offering bounties of up to $1.5 million for some Android exploits.

Join Mikko Hyppönen and security leaders from the NFL, CHANEL, and Atlassian for a two-hour digital summit on what AI-speed attacks change, what defenders should stop doing, and how to validate, decide, fix, and re-validate at machine speed.

Save your seat

Mike Lake wanted a Porsche 992 GT3 RS and refused to wait for a lottery allocation or a secondhand bill north of $750,000 Australian ($535,000). He bought a tired 986 Boxster for about $13,000, drove two thousand kilometers to collect it, and set out to wrap that mid-engine roadster in a full-size printed replica. He calls the result GT3D. Consumer printers, PETG filament, and a garage in Melbourne did the rest.

After taking a huge gamble with a Facebook purchase, files for the corpse appeared. Lake disassembled each panel into tiny components small enough to fit in a couple of machines costing only a few hundred dollars each. When they were counting them previously, they estimated that the entire kit contained 477 parts, 62 kg of plastic, and approximately 2,000 hours of print time. When you come to the end of the build, the data was updated to nearly 1,500 hours and 80 kg of PETG, and that doesn’t include any failure prints or revisions they made later on. One front bumper alone required sixty-one parts, 381 hours of printing time, and more than 10 kg of plastic. Only one fender took 55 hours to complete. The roof was the most difficult single piece of assembly because it came from a convertible donor. It required 41 or 42 printed parts and another 120 hours before it even saw a drop of resin.

Sale

LEGO Speed Champions Porsche 911 GT3 RS Super Car Toy – Model Kit & Pretend Play Toy for Boys & Girls…

• BUILD A RACING LEGEND – Boys and girls ages 9 years old and up can construct the LEGO Speed Champions Porsche 911 GT3 RS Super Car (77239) building…
• AUTHENTIC PORSCHE DETAILS – Young builders can recreate the real-life vehicle’s signature elements including the famous rear wing, air intake…
• 1 PORSCHE DRIVER MINIFIGURE – Kids can place the driver minifigure with helmet and red Porsche Track Day Experience outfit behind the wheel to stage…

So the printed sections were assembled using plastic welding and strengthened slightly. They used pool noodles cut up as interior formers for their early roof work. Lake eventually figured out how add some fiberglass fabric and resin across full panels after confirming the concept with a single quarter panel test, which demonstrated that adding the extra skin provided a lot of extra rigidity for a tiny bit more thickness. The B pillars were strengthened just in case, and the chassis points were braced so the wide printed arches wouldn’t flex all over the place, and moving the radiators out of the way to fit in the larger wheels proved to be a sensible decision once the car left the garage.

Among all the printed parts, there were a few genuine pieces of hardware. There’s a true 992 light bar out back, and the headlights are from a 991.1 because the newer 992 units required a camber system that Lake didn’t have lying around, and then there’s the carbon fiber 992 mirror covers that simply snap onto the printed hybrid housing. The door handles, fuel filling, and the rest of it all remained Boxster parts, inserted into printed surrounds, so the car still opens and closes like the donor. Artka’s custom two-piece forged wheels fill the arches at GT3 RS widths without the need for spacers, and Plastics for Performance windows are 50% lighter than factory glass. The first time they tinted them, the plastic went a little crazy in the sunlight and became all bubbly, but a second film fixed that right away.

Aero received the same treatment, with Ryan from the Fat Lip Collective designing the active DRS wing from scratch. Aluminum rods pass directly through the printed blades, while the electric actuators sit on the stands, seemingly unconcerned, communicating with a Haltech ECU. The first time they hooked it all up, it just worked without any fuss. The profile is completed by the Project Eero front lip and the printed ducktail, and because a proper car has some flare, they added some Sequoia Media stickers and a 3D printed badge that says GT3D rather than GT3 RS.

Under the hood, the Boxster flat-six retains all of its power, albeit with a Turbosmart 5862 turbo, some Legacy Fab piping, a top-mounted Phoenix intercooler, and a set of titanium exhaust tips held on by V-band clamps. There are already videos of the first start-ups, but they need to put it on the dyno to get a real look at the figures. The paint work is a peach Hammer Coatings job over some primed and textured surfaces, followed by some satin black on the doors and under the bonnet, then a lovely clear coat to bring out the color. Six crazy days of assembly got it all done just in time for World Time Attack at Sydney Motorsport Park in September, and when the crowds saw it, they thought it was a proper factory GT3 RS until they got close enough to see all the layer lines they’d managed to hide so well in the bodywork.

A hot potato: Warrantless database searches are a central part of the growing controversy around Flock’s AI-powered camera surveillance network. As police officers keep getting caught abusing the company’s license plate readers, a new analysis of its search records suggests the problem runs deeper than isolated incidents and hint at the true scale of the issue.

Search logs from Flock’s Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) database show that, over the past few years, officers across the US have routinely searched the system without offering any legitimate justification. And the company’s own fix for the problem may have made it worse.

The records, obtained by the EFF through a public records request, show officers repeatedly typing flippant or nonsensical answers into the mandatory “reason for search” field. Common entries included “LMAO,” “lol,” “idk,” and outright strings of random keyboard mashing.

Flock’s ALPRs, now deployed across thousands of US communities, use AI to log passing vehicles’ plates into a searchable cloud database that officers can use to reconstruct people’s movements. Unlike a search of someone’s cell phone location history, pulling data from Flock’s database does not require a warrant.

Officers are supposed to document a reason for every search, but plenty have simply ignored that requirement. It’s one of the core complaints about Flock’s system, alongside the dozens of officers who’ve been caught using it to stalk women.

The throwaway search justifications span roughly 2023 into 2026, even after Flock began pushing officers toward a drop-down menu of pre-set reasons in late 2025 instead of a free-text field. However, instead of fixing the issue, the change might have pushed officers to obscure random searches behind seemingly legitimate causes. Many simply select “other.”

Concerns about mass surveillance and false positives have pushed numerous towns to cancel their Flock contracts. People are also regularly caught destroying the company’s cameras outright, and rival ALPR vendors are trying to distance themselves from Flock’s reputation while marketing hardware that does essentially the same thing.

Flock, for its part, says new contracts far outnumber cancellations – and in at least one case, the company reinstalled its cameras without permission after a city had already removed them. Flock and its competitors are also expanding beyond stationary plate readers: the company’s fastest-growing business is now drones that read license plates from the sky, and police departments nationwide are increasingly using them for live surveillance, often for calls that aren’t emergencies at all.

As TechRadar’s coffee expert and custodian of our guide to the best coffee machines in Australia, you can rest assured I make it my mission to trial as many espresso machines as possible. One brand that has, so far, eluded me, however, is Jura.

Judging by our Jura J10 and Jura Z10 reviews, that’s clearly a shame, as the Swiss brand is an expert in all things automatic coffee machines. And that’s exactly why a massive 57% discount on the Jura S8 at The Good Guys piqued my curiosity and made me do a double take.

Plummeting from AU$3,690 to AU$1,589, this is a prime opportunity to snap up an uber-premium bean-to-cup machine to take pride of place in your kitchen for years to come.

While I do enjoy getting hands on with a coffee machine — I’m a huge fan of the KitchenAid Semi-Automatic, for example — in my mind an automatic model is ideal. I can press a couple of buttons, pull up a saved recipe and have my coffee brewing whilst attending to other tasks.

The Jura S8 therefore looks like it could be my new best friend for a number of reasons. Firstly, Jura has been making automatic coffee machines for around 40 years, so it arguably has the expertise to understand what makes a decent cuppa.

That experience extends to proprietary technologies, including its P.A.G.2 grinder with its seven selectable grind levels, an eighth-generation 3D brewing unit that passes water through coffee on multiple levels for a more even extraction and the use of the Pulse Extraction Process (P.E.P.) that pushes water through the puck in pulses rather than one uninterrupted flow, to optimise extraction time.

The 27 drinks can be customised to a great extent too, with 10 strength settings, programmable water and milk quantities and three brewing-temperature settings. And, as mentioned earlier, the S8 can produce Sweet Foam — milk foamed with flavoured syrup during preparation. My colleague Cat Ellis has said the results are “delicious” in her Jura J10 review. Plus, the large 4.3-inch touchscreen looks glorious in pictures.

On paper then, the Jura S8 looks to be the perfect coffee machine for me. Not only does it promise top-tier performance, but I also think it’s a bit of a looker compared to many other machines that are more akin to black boxes.

This huge AU$2,101 saving at The Good Guys lists an end date of September 30, so while you do have a little bit of time to take advantage, it could transpire that stock could run out before then!

Want more suggestions?

Mac owners upgrading to macOS 27 will need to replace their AirPort Time Capsule for Time Machine backups. We picked five diskless NAS enclosures that cost less than $300 to fit the bill.

Apple released macOS 27 Golden Gate on September 14 without support for Apple Filing Protocol, or AFP. AirPort Time Capsule and AirPort Disk depend on AFP for Time Machine backups.

The company’s updated support document says Time Machine continues to work with third-party network-attached storage devices that support Server Message Block, or SMB. The five options below support network backups from a Mac, although availability and sale prices can change.

These prices cover the enclosures rather than complete storage systems. Buyers must add at least one compatible drive and connect the NAS to an existing router through Ethernet.

The macOS change doesn’t disable the AirPort’s router or Wi-Fi hardware. It specifically prevents Macs running macOS 27 from using an AirPort Time Capsule or AirPort Disk as a Time Machine destination.

Some of these will work as routers, properly configured. We leave this, and a debate about the security of doing this, as an exercise for the reader

They also don’t provide Wi-Fi, like a Time Capsile does. The Time Capsule is so far out of support at this point, though, you’ve probably already moved on from that.

Anyone with files stored only in an existing Time Capsule backup should restore them before upgrading. Keep the old backup intact until the replacement NAS has completed a full backup and successfully restored a test file.

Here’s what we’ve done. We took the original retail price of the fifth generation Time Capsule, adjusted to 2026 dollars, and subtracted a bit more than $100 for the drive of your choice, and rounded down to $300.

All of these network attached storage devices come in under that cost.

TerraMaster F2-425 offers the most processing headroom

The TerraMaster F2-425 provides two SATA drive bays, an Intel N5095 quad-core processor, 4GB of DDR4 memory, and 2.5GbE networking.

TerraMaster allows owners to expand the memory to 16GB, giving the F2-425 room for services beyond file storage. It supports Docker, hardware-assisted 4K video transcoding, and TerraMaster’s TRAID storage system.

TOS 7 includes a Time Machine Backup tool that turns an authorized folder into a network backup destination. Time Machine Backup is disabled by default and must be enabled during setup.

TerraMaster F2-425 2-Bay NAS review: It uses two bays with tool-free sleds

Our review gave the F2-425 four out of five stars for its performance, memory expansion, and virtualization support. Its two-drive limit restricts the available RAID configurations, but RAID 1 can protect a Time Machine volume against the failure of one drive.

Buy TerraMaster F2-425

The F2-425 is the strongest option for someone who needs network backups now and may later add a media server, Home Assistant, or other self-hosted software.

The TerraMaster F2-425 is available from B&H Photo and Amazon.com for $254.99 at press time, down from $299.99.

Ugreen NASync DH2300 is the easiest starting point

The Ugreen DH2300 targets people buying their first NAS. Its iPhone-assisted setup removes much of the address hunting and browser configuration that can make network storage intimidating.

An eight-core Rockchip RK3576 processor and 4GB of fixed memory run UGOS Pro. Connectivity includes Gigabit Ethernet, USB-C, two USB-A ports, and an HDMI output capable of driving a 4K display.

Ugreen NASync DH2300 top-down view of the two drive bays

UGOS Pro supports Time Machine backups from a Mac over SMB. Ugreen also includes phone backups, remote file access, media applications, and local photo organization.

Buy Ugreen NASync DH2300

The DH2300 doesn’t support Docker or memory upgrades, so it isn’t intended to become a demanding home server. Our review awarded it four out of five stars and found that its hardware was fast enough for secure file serving and ordinary household backups.

The DH2300 is the most approachable choice for someone who wants automatic Mac backups without extensive NAS administration.

The Ugreen NASync DH2300 is available from Ugreen direct for $227.99 and from Amazon.com, where pricing can vary.

LincStation E1 combines SATA and NVMe storage

The LincStation E1 combines two SATA drive bays and two M.2 NVMe slots. LincPlus calls it a four-bay NAS, although only two bays accept conventional hard drives.

The combination supports inexpensive hard drives alongside faster solid-state storage. A Rockchip RK3568 quad-core processor and 4GB of fixed memory run LincOS.

The enclosure also provides 2.5GbE, HDMI, Wi-Fi 5, and three USB-A connections.

LincPlus LincStation E1 rear USB-A, HDMI, and Ethernet ports

Time Machine worked with the unit we tested, but LincPlus doesn’t document the feature as clearly as TerraMaster, Ugreen, Synology, or Qnap. Buyers should confirm that current LincOS firmware still exposes an SMB-compatible Time Machine destination.

Buy LincStation E1

LincPlus doesn’t offer a macOS management client. Mac owners must administer the NAS through its local web interface, while the company’s iPhone, iPad, Android, or Windows software handles built-in remote access.

The unusual mix of SATA and NVMe storage gives the E1 more flexibility than a conventional two-bay NAS. Its limited processor and developing software make it a better fit for basic storage than demanding server applications.

The LincStation E1 is listed through the LincPlus store for $169, down from $219. An Amazon listing is also available, with price and stock subject to change.

Synology DiskStation DS223j emphasizes mature software

The Synology DS223j is a two-bay diskless enclosure. Its 1GB of fixed memory and Gigabit Ethernet limit heavier workloads, but Synology’s established DiskStation Manager software remains its main advantage.

The DS223j uses a 1.7GHz Realtek RTD1619B quad-core processor. Both bays accept 3.5-inch SATA hard drives, while 2.5-inch drives require optional holders.

Synology also supports Btrfs and snapshots on the DS223j

DiskStation Manager supports Time Machine through SMB and lets an administrator place storage quotas on individual backup users. Quotas prevent one Mac’s backup history from consuming the entire shared volume.

Buy Synology DiskStation DS223j

Synology also supports Btrfs and snapshots on the DS223j. File self-healing requires a storage pool with redundant data, such as mirrored drives, rather than Btrfs alone.

The DS223j is the conservative choice for users who value documentation, software maturity, and a large application ecosystem more than faster networking.

The Synology DiskStation DS223j is available from B&H Photo for $209.99 and from Amazon.com, where pricing can vary.

QNAP TS-216G puts 2.5GbE near the price limit

The Qnap TS-216G combines two SATA drive bays with a 2.5GbE port. It uses a 2GHz Arm Cortex-A55 quad-core processor and 4GB of memory.

Qnap recorded SMB transfers of up to 291MB per second in laboratory testing with SATA SSDs, RAID 1, 2.5GbE, and a Windows Server client. A Mac connected through ordinary Gigabit Ethernet won’t reach those speeds.

The TS-216G officially supports Time Machine, and Qnap provides instructions for creating a dedicated backup user and shared folder through QTS. Its setup guide directs users to enable SMB 3 before selecting the shared folder in Time Machine.

Buy QNAP TS-216G

Qnap also includes snapshots, mobile photo backups, USB one-touch copying, and an NPU for recognizing faces and objects in stored photos. Its hot-swappable bays allow a failed drive to be replaced without shutting down the NAS when the storage configuration can tolerate the failure.

The TS-216G is the best fit for a household with several Macs or an existing 2.5GbE network. Its extensive settings and applications provide flexibility, but they also create a steeper learning curve.

Qnap recorded SMB transfers of up to 291MB per second

The Qnap TS-216G is available from B&H Photo and Amazon.com for $299.

A drive connected to your router isn’t a universal replacement

Some consumer routers can share an attached USB drive as a Time Machine destination, but support and safety depends on the exact model. Check the router’s manual for explicit Time Machine over SMB support before relying on it for macOS 27 backups.

Owners who bought and configured their own routers may have compatible hardware. Most ISP-provided gateways don’t offer the required storage and backup controls, so customers using one probably won’t have much luck there.

Drives and RAID increase the final cost

All five NAS devices above are sold without user storage. Adding one drive provides the lowest initial cost, while two matching drives allow RAID 1 to preserve access if one drive fails.

RAID 1 writes the same data to both drives, but it doesn’t protect against deletion, theft, fire, malware, or failure of the NAS itself. Irreplaceable files still need another local or off-site copy.

The AirPort Time Capsule combined a router and a hard drive, making a Time Machine destination in one device. We’re still testing the third-party patch that adds SMB3 to the older units, making them compatible again.

Ultimately, they are just too old to keep relying on.

These replacements require more setup, but they are much newer, provide replaceable drives, larger potential capacities, modern SMB support, and more control over Mac backups.

Garmin’s Forerunner 170 is a solid running watch that brings great performance and smart features, all in a light and small package, and I particularly loved the Music version for phoneless short runs and activities. The watch was even found to be very accurate, according to my colleague Matt Evans’ testing.

At AU$479 (or AU$549 for the Music version), however, it isn’t the most affordable as far as fitness smartwatches go — so when I found the older (but higher-tier) Forerunner 265 discounted by 38% on Amazon, I knew this was a deal too tempting to pass up.

Featuring a more accurate dual-band GPS technology, 13 days of battery life, more size options and on-watch music storage, the Forerunner 265 is hard to beat for just AU$498.

The Garmin Forerunner 265 was the first small Forerunner model with a touchscreen AMOLED display, replacing its predecessor’s monochrome memory-in-pixel display, to make it look and feel similar to something like an Apple Watch or a Samsung Galaxy Watch.

It also features dual-band or multi-frequency GPS for high-precision tracking in dense cities or heavy tree cover, which is technically superior to the Forerunner 170’s single-frequency multi-GNSS tracking.

The 170 is only available in the single 43mm size, while the 265 comes in 46mm and the smaller 265S is 42mm, providing more options for different wrist sizes.

The biggest criticism from our reviewer is the Forerunner 265’s price hike over its predecessor, and slightly worse battery life, which can be credited to the switch to an AMOLED display, but this discount takes care of the former in spades.

Interested in other Garmin products? Check out the latest Garmin Australia coupons here.

The age of the Intel Mac is coming to an end in every sense, as Apple now classifies the last 21.5-inch Intel-based iMac as a “vintage product.”

In 2019, Apple updated the aging Intel iMac with eighth-generation Intel processors and new AMD Radeon graphics cards. It shipped in the same slim chassis Apple introduced back in 2012, and Apple still offered then-outdated options like the 1TB Fusion Drive.

It was already a mediocre upgrade in its own right, but the arrival of Apple Silicon the following year made it even less desirable. Now, macOS Golden Gate has ended software support for Intel Macs, and the 2019 21.5-inch iMac has made its way to Apple’s “vintage products” list.

Apple considers a product “vintage” when it stopped distributing it for sale more than five years ago but less than seven years ago. The company provides service and parts for vintage products for up to seven years, assuming the necessary parts are available.

Once a product hasn’t been sold new for more than seven years, it’s then classified as “obsolete.” In short, the 2019 21.5-inch iMac is still eligible for repairs from Apple and its authorized service providers, assuming the required parts are available.

While the 2019 21.5-inch iMac will officially be obsolete in 2028, meaning repairs will no longer be offered, that doesn’t mean the computer won’t be serviceable at all. Apple’s older Intel iMacs feature upgradeable storage, RAM, and a socketed CPU, assuming you’re willing to remove the display with the proper tools.

Software-wise, the last 21.5-inch Intel iMac will likely forever be stuck on macOS Sequoia, though Apple is still expected to release security updates through 2027.