Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

The 7 Best Automatic Litter Boxes (2025) Our Cats Would Recommend

Published

on

Compare Our Picks

Others We Tested

Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Wood Plant Potted Plant Chair and Furniture

Photograph: Kat Merck

Els Pet Orbitie for $290: This is one of the least expensive automatic litter boxes, but it functions much like the more expensive models, with an internal 65-liter-capacity orb that rotates and catches clumps with a plastic grate, depositing them into a bag-lined box below. The opening is a generous 12 by 12 inches—plenty big enough for my two 7-year-old cats, who took to it almost immediately despite never having seen anything but a traditional litter box. The accompanying Orbitie app doesn’t offer an extensive amount of information; it tells the user the volume of litter and what step of the cleaning phase the box is currently in, as well as how many times the box has been used and at what times. The first test unit I received was faulty—it sent multiple phantom alerts to the app, letting me know it had cleaned itself as many as 36 times a day, which I knew for a fact was not true. The replacement unit, however, works just as intended, though the bin beneath fills up fast (about every other day with my two cats), and it occasionally needs to be disassembled and cleaned, as tiny pieces of cat litter have a tendency to get in the gears beneath the orb (and make a loud grinding noise). However, this isn’t an unusual occurrence even with pricier boxes. Online reviews panned an earlier version of this box, but Orbitie says this is an improved version. Thankfully, like the bigger brands, Orbitie also offers a 90-day money-back guarantee if you’re on the fence. Kat Merck

Image may contain Animal Cat Mammal Pet Appliance Device Electrical Device and Washer

Photograph: Molly Higgins

FurryTail Automatic Litter Box Pro for $400: I was surprised by how quickly and easily my cats took to this device—even my larger cat, who hates change, started using it right away. Setup was super easy, and the box comes with a year’s supply of waste bag liners, an additional grate attachment, and a mat to reduce litter tracking. Similar to many models, the spherical orb rotates, sifting dirty litter into a waste bag, which, on this model, is on top of the machine rather than below. The box has both a manual display and buttons on the machine, as well as an app to adjust settings. I’d include this model in our top picks because of how easy it was to set up and use, as well as how much my cats liked it, but the app was basically useless. Through the app, you can adjust settings like timed cleanings and do-not-disturb modes, manually clean, and monitor waste levels. However, the app never tracked usage or weight, and for the majority of the time, didn’t clean when I manually instructed it to. The sensors would sense ghost cats and refuse to clean, with the device not automatically cycling for the majority of the day (which sort of defeats the purpose). This automatic box has tons of potential, but I can’t fully recommend it until the kinks (especially in the app) are ironed out.

Advertisement
Leo's Loo Too Litter Box

Courtesy of Smarty Pear

Casa Leo Leo’s Loo Too Automatic Litter Box for $700: This automatic litter box was a top pick for a long time, but it’s pricey and a bit cramped for some cats. We still like it, but think the options above are better for most people (and cats). There are four weight sensors inside the barrel to detect when a cat is still inside (it needs just 1 pound of weight to detect your cat), an anti-pinch sensor (for fingers and paws), and a radar system that detects when anyone, feline or human, is near it. For extra cleanliness, it also uses ultraviolet light for extra sanitation. The Smarty Pear app (on iOS and Android) alerts you when the drawer is full (about once a week), records the times your cat uses it and the cat’s weight, and you can set it to automatically clean six seconds to 20 minutes after your cat uses it. You can start a cleaning session manually from the app or use your voice if you connect the box to Alexa or Google Assistant. Former WIRED reviewer Medea Giordano’s biggest struggle using the Loo Too was pouring new litter into it, which can be tricky because of the small entry hole. The barrel is also pretty cramped, especially for her 12-pound cat.

Domeshaped cat litter device with beige materials inside on the bottom

Photograph: Simon Hill

PetSafe ScoopFree SmartSpin Self-Cleaning Litter Box for $370: This basic automatic litter box is around half the price but has a similar design to more expensive models. This futuristic-looking pod on legs has a rubbery bottom, a weight detector that sets off the cleaning cycle a few minutes after your cat has done its business, and a slide-out tray in the bottom. After they’ve been, the body rotates, and a mesh catches the clumps and deposits them in the tray, where there’s a bag with a wee deodorizer unit that smells like watermelon. You can connect it to Wi-Fi and review your cat’s toilet visits in the app on your phone, where each entry displays the time they went, their weight, and toilet trip duration. This self-cleaning box was easy to build and works surprisingly well, even though it feels kinda cheap. Ultimately, as a relatively affordable self-cleaning device, the PetSafe ScoopFree SmartSpin is worth a look. Simon Hill

Not Recommended

Pet Snowy Self Cleaning Litter Box in white and beige

Photograph: Molly Higgins

PetSnowy Snow+ Self-Cleaning Litter Box for $680: This box looks like something from Kubrick’s visions of space travel, or if Eames started making plastic litter boxes. It takes up quite a bit of horizontal floor space, so it may not be ideal for those in cramped apartments looking to conserve space. Unlike all others on this list, this globe is closed during cleaning, which could cause injury if the machine malfunctioned and didn’t sense a cat. The box also doesn’t tell you when the litter’s low or needs to be refilled. My cats had a really hard time using it—they just couldn’t understand that it was a litter box. Older cats could have a tough time jumping into it, and the smaller opening could be a problem if you have bigger cats. It might be great for someone who wants to keep things tidy—it’s extremely clean, smells good, and hugely reduces litter tracking. However, we just can’t recommend the device since it’s closed during cleaning, which is not safe.

Advertisement
Image may contain Indoors Interior Design Bathroom Room Toilet Appliance Device Electrical Device and Washer

Petlibro Luma Smart Litter Box for $600: I’m a big fan of Petlibro’s automatic feeders and fountains, but I’ve found that the brand’s other tech products, like this automatic litter box and AI-enabled pet camera, aren’t on the same level. First, we cannot recommend any model that closes completely during cleaning cycles. The Luma is outfitted with tons of sensors to prevent cleaning while a cat (or any object) is inside or near the entrance, and I highly doubt injury would occur. But the globe spins backward and forward, rather than clockwise and counterclockwise, meaning that the entrance is closed during cycling. If a sensing malfunction happened, the cat would be trapped inside. I appreciated the button controls on the outside top, which allow for manual control. However, they’re on a touchscreen above the camera. So, oftentimes, when I tried to manually reset, the camera caught me and wouldn’t continue the cleaning or control I asked of it, because the safety features would prevent action inside the box. It was very frustrating. When I went out of town, it got stuck in the middle of the cleaning cycle for two days because it kept sensing a ghost cat. The globe was mid-cycle, and the entrance was covered; I couldn’t bypass via the app to keep cleaning. (Thank God I had a second litter box for my cats available, or I would’ve been SOL.) The auto-deodorizing feature goes off automatically for five minutes after each use and sounds like an airplane engine. There’s no way to turn it off; you can turn the power down to a lower level, but it’s still egregiously loud. Right now, I can’t recommend this model (mostly for safety reasons), but a lot of the design flaws could be fixed in future iterations to make it a solid choice.

Image may contain Floor and Flooring

Photograph: Molly Higgins

The Pet Zone Smart Scoop for $166: This is probably the least “smart” automatic litter box we’ve tested—it’s a typical rectangular plastic box with an automatic arm that acts as a rake and scoops the clumped (soiled) litter into a small bin on the other side. Once the cat leaves, it begins a 15-minute countdown and the rake slides over the length of the box, (ideally) scooping up the waste and lifting it into the receptacle. You’re only allowed to fill the device with about an inch and a half of litter, which my cats didn’t like (they prefer a few inches to really bury it). The rake doesn’t stop when it’s in the cleaning cycle—even if something jumps in, which is potentially dangerous. My cats tend to pee on the side of the litter box, which, because of the rake’s placement, means it misses an inch on either side—I still had to scrape the caked-on litter from the edges. The cycle timing can’t be adjusted, so the litter didn’t have time to clump completely, and the rake would immediately break it down into smaller clumps that would then be missed because they were too small. For me, the hassle’s not worth it, and I’d rather just scoop it myself.

How Do Automatic Litter Boxes Work?

Automatic litter boxes vary depending on the brand and litter type. Generally, they have sensors, either by motion or weight, to tell when a cat has entered or exited the device. Usually customizable and controlled via app on your phone, or on a more rudimentary timer system, the cleaning cycle will begin a short time after the cat has used the box. With dome-shaped litter boxes, the cleaning will happen via a cycle where the litter spins and rotates around the spherical interior; the bigger soiled clumps will be deposited into the waste basket while the clean granules pass through the grates and get recycled back into the box.

The Petkit PuraMax 2, for example, rotates backward and then forward (rather than a clock-wise/counter-clockwise spin cycle) to sift the clumps from the clean litter, depositing the larger clumps into the waste basket. The Pet Zone Smart Scoop is the most rudimentary we tested, simply using a rake attachment to scoop the bigger clumps into a waste receptacle in the back.

Advertisement

Are Automatic Litter Boxes Safe?

Pet owners should always do research and make an informed decision regarding which box is best for them and their cat. We only tested automatic litter boxes that remain open during cycling to ensure that if for some reason the weight sensors didn’t pick up on a cat being inside, the cat could jump out. We don’t recommend devices that close completely because of the potential that the machine could not sense the cat and kill it during its automatic cycle.

These automatic boxes use sensors—some only needing 1 pound of weight to detect your cat—where the cycle will automatically stop no matter where it is in the cleaning process. Many also have anti-pinch sensors. For added security, the devices on this list have customizable schedules, including “do not disturb” modes. If you’re a neurotic helicopter cat mom like me, you could only run the clean cycles when you choose, like when you’re in the room to observe the cycle (although if you do that, the box won’t stay clean for as long).

Where Should I Put the Automatic Litter Box?

Advertisement

All of these automatic litter boxes require electricity, so they will need to be near an outlet. Since cats will generally take a little while to get comfortable with their new potty, I recommend that you keep your old litter box until they use the device regularly. It helps to put the new automatic litter box near the old boxes to familiarize your cat with it. Adding in litter attractant and using old litter from the previous box also encourages your cat to use the new model.

As a general rule, for old-school litter boxes, you should have one box for each cat, plus one. With automatic models constantly cleaning, there is less need for multiple options, but we recommend leaving your old litter box out for an extended period to ensure the cat has acclimated to the new automatic box.

History of the Automatic Litter Box

Rudimentary automatic litter boxes have been around since the late ’80s. These early models featured an automatic rake attachment (much like the Pet Zone Smart Scoop box) but had problems with reliability and loudness. It wasn’t until the 2010s that the devices started incorporating advanced tech like Wi-Fi and app control. In the decade since, that technology has continuously grown and improved, with most devices providing insight into your cats’ habits and health—truly becoming an asset in understanding your feline friends even better.

Advertisement

What Should You Look for When Shopping?

After testing around a dozen automatic litter boxes, I look for several things that make day-to-day life with the device easier for you and your pet. First, the connected app. This is what you’ll be checking daily, so it’s important that it works well. This is one of the reasons the Litter-Robot 4 was our top pick for a long time: its connected app is intuitive, simple to use, and reliable. I absolutely love the Petkit models we’ve tested, but the app is subpar, overcrowded with ads for other products and poorly translated. I also look for anything that makes filling litter easier: I love the Litter-Hopper attachment, which refills litter for you on Litter-Robot models, the self-filling litter reservoir on Homerunpet, and the self-sealing waste bags of the newest Petkit models. You’ll also want to keep the cat’s size in mind. My two cats are large, so I tend to opt for something with an extra-large, front-facing hole. What box you choose depends on litter type and compatibility—if you’re using tofu litter, make sure you get a model that is compatible with your preferred type. Budget is also a factor, with some models as low as $150 or as high as nearly a grand.

How Does WIRED Select Models to Be Reviewed?

I do a lot of research, looking up other reviews online, including our competitors, to see which are getting buzz. Since I’m the pet tech writer here at WIRED, I also have knowledge from other pet tech brands I love for things like automatic feeders and pet water fountains. Most of these brands also have automatic litter boxes, which I always try to test among their lineup of new pet tech. I also talk to other cat-parents to see what they’re using (and liking). I aim to test a wide range of styles and price points for every type of budget and cat.

Advertisement

How Does WIRED Acquire the Boxes?

Oftentimes, we reach out to brands we’re excited about and are gifted them for potential review. Other times, if there is a model we want to try but can’t reach the brand for, we will buy it ourselves. I bought the The Pet Zone Smart Scoop, but it isn’t a model we recommend others buy.

What Does WIRED Do With Them After Testing?

Some products that we’re really excited about, we keep for long-term testing to see if they hold up over time. This is especially useful for our former top pick, the Litter-Robot 4, whose Litter-Hopper attachment eventually stopped working, or the Petkit models, whose AI starts falling flat without a Care+ subscription. Keeping some devices for longer-term testing helps ensure that we are giving our readers a comprehensive review. Most models we test for several weeks and donate locally when finished.

Advertisement

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

What Is The ‘Green Wave’ When It Comes To Traffic Lights?

Published

on





There are many drivers who often bemoan the very existence of traffic lights. Despite incurring the daily ire of commuters who are running late for work, even those haters have to acknowledge the traffic signal’s invaluable function in helping to keep our roadways safe.

Traffic signals have, of course, evolved considerably since they were first pressed into use in the late-1860s, with the first electric lights coming into play sometime around 1912. It wasn’t long until those signals started using colored lights, and have since evolved into the red, yellow, and green modes we are all too familiar with today. Even as safety remains the primary purpose of the hundreds of thousands of traffic lights currently employed throughout the United States, some theorize that the life-saving devices may one day cease to exist

Until that fateful day, getting stuck at red lights when you’re in a rush will remain a constant source of commuter frustration. On some occasions, however, a stream of greens opens up on the road ahead like the parting of the Red Sea. That stream of green has a name, with researchers dubbing it the “Green Wave.” While they may seem rare, the “Green Wave” is a common occurrence in certain parts of the world, and it serves a very important purpose.

Advertisement

What is the purpose of a traffic light Green Wave?

While it might seem like a weird sort of karmic intervention, that “Green Wave” of traffic lights was actually programmed for a specific purpose by whatever government organization is in charge of maintaining the traffic signals in your city, state or township. They are, however, far more commonly utilized on high-volume roads in urban areas. The purpose of a “Green Wave” is to improve the flow of traffic in those areas, particularly during times with increased traffic volume. 

At its core, the concept is very simple. The idea is to keep traffic flowing during peak volume times by simply reducing the number of stops at concurrent traffic signals. To enact a “Green Wave,” planners and engineers simply synchronize the traffic lights in congested areas to all turn green at the same time and stay that way for a specified period that ensures a steady flow of traffic in one direction. The method is, naturally, easier to manage on one-way streets with no turning lanes, though some cities have attempted to aid traffic flow further by simply outlawing left turns in metropolitan areas. Some have even taken to banning right turns too

Advertisement

In any case, on top of aiding the flow of traffic in congested areas, “Green Wave” traffic patterns are also believed to have a positive effect on the environment. After all, the reduction in stop-and-go traffic also reduces a vehicle’s idling time, which, in turn, leads to reduced greenhouse gas emissions.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Digit Humanoid Nails a 65-Pound Deadlift and Reveals How Agility Trains Its Robots

Published

on

Agility Digit Humanoid Robot Deadlifting Weightlifting
Digit is seen performing deadlifts with a 65-pound weight in the center of a lab. Agility Robotics shared the video a few days ago, and to be honest, the robot maintains a fairly steady balance and completes the task from beginning to end. Someone mentions that the new version can lift significantly more weight than the previous one, while another laughs about how it can run all day without stopping.



The engineers designed the test so that Digit had to work harder than usual. Every additional pound it must lift causes the robot to modify its entire body at simultaneously, including its arms, legs, torso, and everything else. The system must keep the weight centered and avoid tipping over, therefore the legs, arms, and rest of the robot must all function together. These actuators and joints can withstand repeated load without breaking down. Digit’s video simply shows the robot grasping the weight, rising up, then effortlessly placing it down repeatedly in a standard indoor location built for people.


Unitree G1 Humanoid Robot(No Secondary Development)
  • Sleek & Durable Design: Standing at 132cm tall and weighing only approx. 35kg, the G1 is constructed with aerospace-grade aluminum alloy and carbon…
  • High Flexibility & Safe Movement: Boasting 23 joint degrees of freedom (6 per leg, 5 per arm), it offers an extensive range of motion. For safety, it…
  • Smart Interaction & Connectivity: Powered by an 8-core high-performance CPU and equipped with a depth camera and 3D LiDAR. It supports Wi-Fi 6 and…

Simulation is where all of the training takes place, because before it touches a real weight, an engineer creates a digital copy of the same thing in a virtual world. Then they anticipate what will happen when the weight shifts. The grip pressure remains constant, with no slipping or lowering. Any changes to the robot’s equilibrium are registered extremely instantly. The policy learns the perfect lift in the simulated environment with no complications before being transmitted directly to the real robot. When you see the real robot perform it, it looks fairly natural because it has already handled every potential variable thousands of times in the simulation.

Agility Digit Humanoid Robot Deadlifting Weightlifting
Engineers chose deadlifts for the test because the movement requires complete body control. A simple arm raise would not put the hardware under the same level of stress. By incorporating weight into the simulation loop, the team is able to handle balancing changes that a pre-programmed script cannot handle alone. As a result, Digit lifts consistently, with no wobbling or resets. This method is easily adaptable to other objects or larger loads in future tests.

Digit was built by Agility to manage long, repetitive jobs that wear people out, such as working in factories or warehouses where you must squeeze into tight spaces, pick up oddly shaped goods, and continue without taking a break. This deadlift test demonstrates Digit’s ability to lift weight on ordinary floors while remaining steady, which is ideal for picking up boxes, carrying tools, and stacking things in human-designed places.

Advertisement

It also illustrates how far they’ve come in teaching robots to perform physical tasks. Whole-body synchronization was originally a nightmare, with hand-tuned code for each joint angle. But now they can simply train a policy in simulation that adapts on the go. Digit detects weight using its sensors, corrects itself in real time, and completes the lift without assistance, while the hardware can keep up because the training has already taught the actuators and joints to be more durable.
[Source]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Is the Iran War Driving a Surge of Interest in Electric Cars?

Published

on

In October and through November, America’s EV sales reached their lowest point since 2022 after government subsidies expired, remembers Time. “But first-quarter data for 2026 shows that used EV sales were 12% higher than the same time last year and 17% higher than the previous quarter.

“One factor likely helping push buyers toward these cars is high gas prices, which recently topped $4.00 a gallon for the first time in four years,” they write — but it’s not just in the U.S. Instead, they argue the conflict “is driving a global surge of interest in electric vehicles…”


In the U.K., electric car sales reached a record high, with 86,120 vehicles sold in March… The French online used-car retailer Aramisauto reported its share of EV sales nearly doubled from February 16 to March 9, rising to 12.7% from 6.5%, while sales of fueled models dropped to 28% of sales from 34%, and sales of diesel models dropped to 10% from 14%. Germany’s largest online car market, mobile.de, told Reuters that the share of EV searches on its website has tripled since the start of March — from 12% to 36%, with car dealers receiving 66% more enquiries for used EVs than in February.

South Korea reported that registrations for electric vehicles more than doubled in March compared to the prior year, due in part to rising fuel prices and government subsidies… In New Zealand, more than 1,000 EVs were registered in the week that ended on March 22, close to double the week before, making it the country’s biggest week for electric vehicle registrations since the end of 2023, according to the country’s Transport Minister, Chris Bishop.

In America, Bloomberg also reports 605 high-speed EV charging stations switched on in just the first three months of 2025, “a 34% increase over the year-earlier period,” according to their analysis of federal data. A data platform focused on EV infrastructure tells Bloomberg that speedier and more reliable chargers are convincing more drivers to go electric and use public plugs.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

La Dolce Audio Current Drive Tube Amplifiers Have a Different Take on Valve Amplification: AXPONA 2026

Published

on

Most loudspeaker designers don’t spend much time debating open versus closed the way headphone enthusiasts do. Cabinets are part of the equation for a reason, offering control, efficiency, and predictable performance. That’s the accepted playbook. But like any good rule in audio, someone is always trying to break it.

At AXPONA 2026La Dolce Audio showed what happens when you ignore that playbook and lean into experimentation. Founder Terry Gesualdo isn’t approaching amplification or speaker design from a traditional standpoint, he’s part of a growing group of builders exploring open designs and current drive amplification as an alternative to the usual voltage driven norm.

I met Gesualdo on the shuttle ride over to the show, which feels about right. This isn’t a polished, corporate origin story, it’s the familiar path of someone who started by modifying gear, then building his own tube amps for himself, then for friends and family. The difference here is that he didn’t stop at tweaking circuits. He kept pushing until the results looked and sounded like something entirely his own.

Current Drive Tube Amplification: Why La Dolce Audio Isn’t Following the Script

Having built a few tube amps, I’m always curious to see what others are doing, and Terry Gesualdo is not following the usual path. Most of his designs are single ended pentode circuits, not triodes, and not push pull designs chasing more voltage swing. That choice alone puts him in a different lane than a lot of tube builders.

Advertisement

Where things really diverge is the move to current drive. Most amplifiers are voltage driven. That’s the standard approach across both solid state and tube designs. Current drive shows up more often inside DACs where signal levels are extremely small, and occasionally in headphone amplifiers, but rarely in loudspeaker systems where current demands are far higher.

la-dolce-amps-rack-axpona-2026

The idea behind current drive is fairly straightforward. By controlling current instead of voltage, the amplifier reduces the impact of back EMF from the driver. That back EMF is the voice coil behaving like a generator as it moves through the magnetic field, feeding energy back into the amplifier. Reduce that interaction and, in theory, you reduce distortion and improve control over the driver.

It’s not a new concept, but it’s one that almost nobody is applying to loudspeakers in this way, especially with tube amplification. That’s what makes what La Dolce Audio is doing worth paying attention to.

Control Over Harmonics Instead of Chasing Purity

Circling back to that idea of ignoring the usual playbook, another aspect that reinforces how La Dolce Audio is taking a different path is the near exclusive use of pentode tubes instead of the more common triodes. Triodes are the simplest form of amplification with three active elements, anode, cathode, and grid. Fewer parts in the signal path is why many listeners and designers gravitate toward them. The assumption is less complexity means lower distortion and fewer unwanted artifacts.

But that’s only part of the story. Harmonic distortion doesn’t disappear just because the circuit is simpler. It just changes character. And not all harmonics are a problem. A lot of what people describe as tube warmth comes from second and third order harmonics, which many listeners actually prefer.

Advertisement

Terry Gesualdo leans into that reality rather than trying to avoid it. By using pentodes, which add additional control elements beyond what a triode offers, he can shape those harmonic structures instead of accepting whatever the circuit gives him. That includes adjusting the balance between second and third order harmonics and even their phase relationships.

It’s a different mindset. Instead of chasing the lowest possible distortion number, the goal is control over how that distortion presents itself, and giving the listener a way to fine tune the result.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Some will find that approach a bit sacrilegious. There’s a large part of the hobby focused on removing as much of this behavior as possible, chasing lower distortion numbers and cleaner measurements. That’s not the goal here.

Advertisement

La Dolce Audio leans into a different philosophy. “If it sounds good, do it” is more than a slogan. It reflects the idea that listening is subjective and that not every system needs to be locked into a single interpretation of neutrality. By giving users control over harmonic structure, the design puts some of that decision making back in the listener’s hands.

UA2.5 and UA2.5M: Modular Power and User Tunability

ua-25m-angle
La Dolce Audio UA2.5M monoblock

La Dolce Audio offers two amplifier paths built around the same core ideas but with different roles. The UA2.5 is a dual channel amplifier rated at roughly 3 to 5 watts depending on tube selection, and it’s where most of the flexibility lives. With 24 possible sound signatures, it gives the user direct control over how the amplifier presents harmonic content and overall character.

The UA2.5M monoblocks step things up in output, delivering around 9 watts per channel, but they take a more focused approach. They are designed to be paired with the UA2.5, which handles preamp duties and sound shaping. As a result, the monoblocks do not include the same tuning controls, focusing instead on providing additional power while maintaining the same underlying design philosophy.

HPA2.3 Headphone Adapter

hpa-23-ua-25-front
La Dolce Audio UA2.5 Tube Amplifier (top) with HPA2.3 Headphone Adapter (bottom)

Alongside its amplifiers, La Dolce Audio offers the HPA2.3 headphone “amplifier,” although that label needs a bit of clarification. It’s not an amplifier in the traditional sense. The HPA2.3 is a passive device designed to work with the UA2.5, relying on it for signal processing and gain. In practice, it converts the UA2.5 into a headphone amplifier rather than operating as one on its own.

That means the HPA2.3 can drive a wide range of headphones depending on how the UA2.5 is configured, but it cannot function independently. No preamp, no sound.

Pricing reflects that modular approach. The UA2.5, which serves as the foundation of the system, runs between $1,799 and $2,499 depending on configuration and tube selection. The UA2.5M monoblocks are $1,999 each, and the HPA2.3 adds another $599. A full system lands in the $3,500 range, depending on how far you go down the rabbit hole.

Advertisement

The Bottom Line

La Dolce Audio isn’t trying to fit into the usual mold, and that’s the point. In a category where a lot of designs feel like small variations on the same theme, this is a reminder that there are still different ways to approach amplification and system building.

Beyond the amplifiers, the partnership with ABX Audiophiles on Discord to offer open baffle speaker kits adds another layer. It invites listeners to get involved, not just as buyers but as participants, with a community that shares ideas, solves problems, and pushes designs forward together. We’ll have more on that ABX side of things in a forthcoming article.

It won’t be for everyone. If you want plug and play simplicity, this isn’t it. But if you’re the type who likes to understand what your system is doing and shape it to your preferences, La Dolce offers something most companies don’t. A system you can actually interact with, not just listen to.

For more information: ladolceaudio.com

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Hisense U7SG TV Review (2026): Better Design, Great Value

Published

on

Unlike previous years in what TV nerds like me call the “brightness wars,” the U7SG doesn’t outblast its predecessor, but it’s not a problem. It gets around three times as bright as anything you can stream (which is naturally capped due to compression), and has enough firepower for all but the flashiest 4K HDR Blu-rays. Its color processing shows a little more restraint than in previous models. It’s not quite what I’d call “accurate to the director’s intent,” like the best TVs I test, but it does keep itself from blasting your eyeballs most of the time.

The high brightness is matched by deep black levels, without much of the “blooming” or “haloing” around bright objects that can dilute the contrast of many budget-friendly TVs. It’s not as striking as OLED TVs, which can control each of their millions of pixels on demand, but it’ll wow you in deep space scenes just the same. I was pleased that the TV’s odd local dimming issue didn’t crop up in real-world content, but the picture does tend to flatten shadows in dark scenes more than expected, even as the matte-like screen does a good job keeping reflections at bay.

Image may contain Electronics Screen Computer Hardware Hardware Monitor Nature Outdoors TV and Scenery

Photograph: Ryan Waniata

There are some other notable flaws. Moving off to the TV’s side in my easy chair led to dimmer colors, washed-out contrast between the brightest and darkest images, and uneven backlighting, aka the “dirty-screen effect.” That stood out most in the green backdrop of the Masters on Sunday as Rory McIlroy held on for the win. It wasn’t an issue when viewing head-on, but even then, I noticed some dingy yellow lines along the screen’s left and right sides with light backgrounds. (I may not have noticed them much if I hadn’t been bombarding this TV with test content first.)

The U7SG still doesn’t feel quite like a premium model. But it’s a very clear, bright TV, and will feel more like it’s worth the money once RGB shows up on other Hisense models and the price on this one drops. If you want something brighter than a similarly priced OLED like the LG B5, the U7 is a great buy and has a few good upgrades over last year’s U75QG.

Advertisement

We’ll know more about the 2026 TV landscape once the new RGB TVs have landed, but if you need a powerful, classy-looking TV before then, the U7SG should be on your list.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Opinion: Whither Microsoft? A view from the neighborhood

Published

on

Microsoft’s Redmond campus. (GeekWire Photo / Todd Bishop)

Feroze Motafram is an operations consultant based in Sammamish, Wash., and founder of Avestan LLC. This piece is adapted from a LinkedIn post.

Someone asked me recently what made me think about writing this. The trigger, I told them, was simpler than you might expect.

I live in Sammamish, in the shadow of Microsoft’s looming presence. Microsoft employees are my neighbors, my social circle, the people I run into at weekend gatherings. Over time I noticed that conversations with them had a distinctive gravitational pull — always inward, toward reorgs, internal politics, who reports to whom now, who’s ascendant, who’s out. Customers were rarely part of the conversation. This usually means navigating the organization has become more consuming than building anything within it.

Microsoft’s stock decline and the softening of real estate in this corridor (both affecting me personally) were the prompts to write it down. The material was already sitting in front of me.

I should be clear about what I am and am not. My formal training is in electrical engineering. The primary instruments of my early career were set squares and slide rules, which will tell you something about both my vintage and my domain. I have spent the intervening decades as a senior executive at Fortune 100 companies and, more recently, as an operations and supply chain consultant. I build and fix things: supply chains, organizations that have lost their way. What I can offer is not insider knowledge. It is 30 years of pattern recognition, applied to what is visible from where I stand.

Advertisement

This is the lens I am bringing. Take it for what it is worth.

The market is asking a question

Microsoft stock declined roughly 25% in Q1 2026, representing its worst quarterly performance since the 2008 financial crisis despite blockbuster results. The market may overreact, but it is not stupid. When the stock of a company of this scale underperforms that of its peer group by double digits, the question worth asking is not “is this a buying opportunity.” The question is: what does the market understand about this organization that the headlines don’t capture?

Part of the answer is visible in the financials. A striking portion of Microsoft’s forward revenue backlog is tied to a single counterparty, OpenAI, an unprofitable startup that has since signed a landmark cloud agreement with Amazon, directly challenging the Azure exclusivity Microsoft had treated as a cornerstone of its AI strategy. Meanwhile, Microsoft is building its own internal AI model as a hedge, an expensive bet layered on top of an already expensive bet.

But the part that does not show up in an earnings report may be the more consequential story. That is what I want to offer here.

Advertisement

The monopoly dividend, and its hidden cost

For the better part of three decades, Microsoft enjoyed something very few companies in history have had: a captive market. Enterprise customers did not use Office because they loved it. They used it because leaving was more painful than staying. That distinction between loyalty and lock-in matters enormously, and it is one that organizations rarely make honestly about themselves.

When your customers cannot leave, the feedback loops that drive genuine innovation go silent. The tendency is to stop asking “what does the customer need?” and start asking “what can we get away with?” Processes multiply. Committees proliferate. Bureaucracy thrives. The organization optimizes for defending territory rather than creating it.

This is not a character failing. It occurs insidiously and unconsciously. It is an entirely rational organizational response to a monopolistic competitive environment. But it leaves a mark. And that mark does not disappear simply because the competitive environment changes.

Satya Nadella earned his laurels, but the work isn’t finished

The Azure pivot was a genuine strategic achievement, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella’s cultural reset from “know-it-all” to “learn-it-all,” as he framed it, was real and necessary. The stack-ranking era that preceded him did generational damage to Microsoft’s ability to collaborate, retain talent, and take meaningful risks. He arrested that decline and deserves full credit for it.

Advertisement

But here one must tread carefully. Stack ranking was formally abolished in the final months of Steve Ballmer’s tenure. The announcement was celebrated, the headlines were laudatory. What is rather more interesting is what one hears in conversations since. Ask Microsoft employees about the performance review system that replaced it, and the response is rarely enthusiastic. Whether the underlying mechanics genuinely changed, or whether the organization simply learned to dress the same instincts in more palatable language, is a question I cannot answer from the outside. What I can observe is that the people doing the work don’t appear to believe the answer is reassuring.

Cultural transformation in a 220,000-person organization moves at a glacial pace. You can change the language in a decade. Changing the instincts takes considerably longer. One has to wonder how many of the engineers and managers who learned to survive the Ballmer years by navigating politics rather than building products have since moved on, and how many remain, in leadership positions, still oriented by instinct toward self-protection over bold action.

What I can observe is the output. Copilot (inarguably Microsoft’s most strategically critical product) has converted just 15 million paid subscribers from a captive base of 450 million Microsoft 365 users. That is 3.3%. When your own customers will not buy what you are selling at scale, it is worth asking whether the product is genuinely solving a problem or simply a feature in search of a use case.

Microsoft’s internal preoccupations do not stay inside the building. I have observed versions of this dynamic before, most vividly when I lived in Brookfield, Wis., in the orbit of GE Healthcare’s then-headquarters. But what I observe in this corridor is of a different magnitude. It is not just politics that dominates the conversation. It is the organization itself — its structure, its hierarchies, its shifting priorities — that has become the primary subject of intellectual energy.

Advertisement

The campus, in a very real sense, has become the product. When navigating the organization becomes more consuming than building anything within it, that is not a criticism of the individuals. It is a diagnosis of the system they are operating inside.

The human capital story no one is writing

There is a dimension to this that the financial press has largely missed, and I raise it because I see it in my community every day… including, in ways I did not anticipate, in my own backyard.

A significant proportion of Microsoft’s engineering talent (and the engineering talent of the broader Seattle tech corridor) consists of H-1B visa holders. These are exceptional professionals: highly educated, deeply skilled, often carrying decade-long career investments in the United States. They have built lives here. Many have children born here. They have been, in many cases, the intellectual engine of the products Microsoft is depending on to compete in the AI era.

That population is operating under a level of personal anxiety that is, in my observation, without modern precedent. Travel advisories from their own employers. A $100,000 petition fee for new visa applications. Proposed rule changes touching birthright citizenship. A policy environment that sends a clear and unambiguous message: your presence here is conditional, negotiable, and subject to revision without notice.

Advertisement

The behavioral consequence of that anxiety is not visible in a quarterly earnings report. But it is real and consequential. People operating under existential personal uncertainty do not take professional risks. They do not champion the bold new initiative. They do not volunteer for the high-visibility project that could fail. They execute reliably on what already exists and protect their position. In an organization that already has a cultural predisposition toward risk aversion, this compounds the pathology in ways that will show up — perhaps not this quarter, but in the product decisions made over the next eighteen months.

The effects are visible beyond the campus walls. Conversations with real estate professionals in this corridor tell a consistent story: demand from this community, which has historically been among the most financially capable buyers in the region, has softened measurably. Not because the finances have changed, but because the horizon has. When you are uncertain whether your visa will be renewed, or whether your children’s citizenship status may be revisited, you do not buy a house.

The softening of demand is not merely an abstraction for those of us who live here. But the more significant consequence is not measured in property values. It is measured in the quality of risk-taking inside those campuses. And risk-taking is precisely what Microsoft needs most right now.

The case for optimism, and why it requires more than patience

None of this is to suggest Microsoft is broken beyond repair. Betting against Microsoft has historically been an enterprise for the foolhardy. The balance sheet remains stellar. The enterprise relationships are genuinely extraordinary. Ripping out Azure, Teams, and the M365 stack is not a decision any CIO makes lightly. The installed-base moat is real, and should not be underestimated by anyone, least of all an operations consultant from the suburbs.

Advertisement

What I would offer, more modestly, is this: the bull case requires more than a great balance sheet and sticky products. It requires an organization capable of genuine innovation at speed. Which in turn requires a culture that rewards risk, retains its most creative talent, and executes with urgency. Whether Microsoft can summon those qualities at this particular moment is a question I cannot answer with conviction.

What I can say is that the market, which is considerably more qualified than I am, appears to be asking the same question. The valuation has compressed to levels not seen in a decade, briefly falling below the S&P 500 for the first time in a generation. That is not the posture of a market betting with conviction that the answer is yes.

Perhaps it should be. I honestly don’t know. What I do know is that the signals visible from outside the building — from the neighborhood, from weekend gatherings, from the casual conversations — are worth paying attention to. They usually are.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Humanoid robot beats human half-marathon world record by 7 minutes at Beijing race with 112 teams

Published

on

A humanoid robot named Lightning completed the Beijing E-Town Half-Marathon today in 50 minutes and 26 seconds, beating the human world record by nearly seven minutes. The robot, built by Shenzhen Honor Smart Technology Development Co., navigated the 21-kilometre course autonomously, without remote control, using multi-sensor fusion and real-time decision-making algorithms. A second Lightning unit, this one remotely controlled, crossed the finish line even faster at 48 minutes and 19 seconds. The human half-marathon world record is 57 minutes and 20 seconds, set by Uganda’s Jacob Kiplimo in Lisbon on 8 March.

The robots and the roughly 12,000 human runners followed the same route but competed in separate lanes. The human race was won by Zhao Haijie of China in 1 hour, 7 minutes, and 47 seconds. The robot race was won by a machine that stands 169 centimetres tall, has an effective leg length of 95 centimetres designed to mimic elite human runners, generates 400 newton-metres of peak torque, and uses a proprietary liquid cooling system with a heat exchange flow rate exceeding four litres per minute, technology borrowed from Honor’s smartphone division.

The scale of the event

This was the second edition of the Robot World Humanoid Robot Games Half-Marathon, co-hosted by the Beijing Municipal People’s Government and China Media Group. The first, held on the same date last year, was riddled with mishaps. Only six of 21 robotic runners completed the course. Several stumbled, careened out of control, or simply lay down at the starting line. The winner, a Tiangong Ultra robot, finished in 2 hours, 40 minutes, and 42 seconds.

The 2026 edition was a different event in almost every respect. One hundred and twelve teams from 26 brands entered, fielding more than 300 individual robots, including five international teams from Germany, France, and Brazil. Roughly 40% of the teams competed in the autonomous navigation category, in which robots must navigate the course without human input. Remote-controlled teams had their net times multiplied by a 1.2 coefficient, a 20% penalty designed to encourage autonomous capability. All three podium finishers in the autonomous category were Honor robots, and all three posted times faster than the human world record.

Advertisement

The improvement from 2025 to 2026, from six finishers out of 21 to more than 100 teams competing with autonomous navigation, represents the kind of year-over-year progress that makes the event significant beyond spectacle. Lightning still collided with a barricade near the finish line and fell, requiring staff to help it back up before it completed the race. Another robot fell at the start line. But the failures were exceptions rather than the norm, a reversal from last year.

Advertisement

Who built the winner

Honor, the smartphone manufacturer spun off from Huawei in 2020, is the first major phone company to enter the humanoid robotics market. It unveiled its humanoid robot programme at Mobile World Congress on 1 March and committed $10 billion over five years to AI development. The company says Lightning’s running speed of four metres per second is 14% faster than Boston Dynamics’ Atlas. The entire development-to-marathon-entry process took one year.

Du Xiaodi, an Honor engineer on the winning team, said the competition’s value lies in technology transfer: “Looking ahead, some of these technologies might be transferred to other areas. For example, structural reliability and liquid-cooling technology could be applied in future industrial scenarios.” The race functions as a forcing function for locomotion, balance, navigation, and endurance, the same capabilities required for factory floors, construction sites, and eventually domestic environments.

China’s humanoid robot industry

The marathon is a showcase for an industry that China is building with the kind of coordinated state investment it previously applied to electric vehicles and solar panels. The 15th Five-Year Plan, covering 2026 to 2030, elevates robotics and “embodied intelligence” to one of the country’s top ten “new industry tracks.” The government has committed a one-trillion-yuan ($138 billion) state-backed fund to humanoid robots, industrial automation, and embodied AI. In February, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology unveiled the “Humanoid Robot and Embodied Intelligence Standard System,” drafted by more than 120 research institutions and manufacturers, with a roadmap to push Chinese standards into ISO and IEC international adoption by 2028.

MIIT describes humanoid robots as “the next groundbreaking innovation following computers, smartphones, and new-energy vehicles.” The industry is projected to surpass 20 billion yuan ($2.8 billion) in scale by the end of this year. Chinese companies already dominate production. AGIBOT shipped more than 5,000 units in 2025. Unitree Robotics shipped 5,500. UBTech shipped more than 1,000 and plans to reach 5,000 this year and 10,000 in 2027. Chinese firms accounted for nearly 90% of global humanoid robot shipments last year. By comparison, Boston Dynamics, Figure AI, and Agility Robotics each shipped approximately 150 units.

Advertisement

The gap between running and usefulness

The question the marathon raises is whether speed on a road translates into capability in a factory or a home. Western humanoid robot companies, including Tesla with Optimus, Figure AI, and those supplying BMW, have emphasised dexterity and manipulation: picking up objects, assembling components, navigating cluttered indoor environments. Chinese companies have invested heavily in bipedal locomotion and speed, which produces more dramatic demonstrations but addresses a narrower slice of the problem.

The global humanoid robot market is projected to reach somewhere between $6.5 billion and $15 billion by 2030, depending on the research firm, with Goldman Sachs estimating $38 billion by 2035. The spread in projections reflects genuine uncertainty about how quickly robots that can run a half marathon will learn to do things that people will pay for. Industrial deployment is advancing: Figure 02 completed an 11-month pilot at a BMW plant, moving more than 90,000 components. But the gap between a controlled factory deployment and the kind of general-purpose humanoid robot that China showcased at its Spring Festival Gala remains wide.

Lightning’s 50-minute half-marathon is a genuine engineering achievement. A robot that navigates 21 kilometres autonomously, maintains balance at 25 kilometres per hour, manages thermal loads through liquid cooling, and recovers from a collision with a barricade has demonstrated capabilities that did not exist in any humanoid platform a year ago. The question is not whether the technology is impressive. It is whether the country investing $138 billion in it will find applications that justify the spending before the rest of the world catches up on a different approach to the same problem.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Chinese Automaker Seres Gets Patent Approved for a Toilet That Slides Out from Under a Passenger Seat

Published

on

Aito Seres Slide-Out Toilet In-Car
Photo credit: Autoblog
Seres developed an in-car toilet design that allows the system to fit inside an electric vehicle without taking up additional room. Engineers put the entire assembly on a movable rail connecting to the seat frame. When it is not needed, the toilet simply disappears beneath the floor. All it takes is a simple nudge or a whispered order, and it appears like a drawer.



Voice commands activate the system with a simple phrase that initiates the toilet function. Once you get access to it, the rest of the interior remains largely unchanged. A built-in fan draws in air and expels foul air through an exhaust pipe. Pee and other waste enter a tank, which must be manually emptied when you get at your destination. They include a small heating element inside that helps to dry everything up, making cleanup easier.

Sale


MARBERO Portable Power Station 88Wh Camping Lithium Battery Solar Generator Fast Charging with AC Outlet…
  • EFFICIENT CHARGING: Use the adapter included in the package to charge the power station from 0 to 80% in 2hrs, and use the this power supply to charge…
  • COMPACT & PORTABLE DESIGN: Super slim size(6.5 x 4.6 x 3.1 inches), the portable power station is about the size of a basic DSLR; With the strong yet…
  • MULTI-OUTPUT: There are 8 output ports could be used at the same time, and the built-in BMS system ensures stability and safety. The car DC charger…

The beauty of it is that when it’s not in use, nothing sticks out, allowing you to use the space for seating or storage. The patent filing cites extended journeys, camping vacations, and any time spent living in your car as the primary reasons for this functionality. Traffic delays that used to force you to make painful decisions are no longer as inconvenient. Seres already manufactures automobiles with features meant to make your daily commute easier. They compete in a market where each new model strives to be unique. This invention fits nicely into that approach by figuring out how to transform something you use every day into another part of the car.

Advertisement

Aito Seres Slide-Out Toilet In-Car
There are still several technicalities to be sorted out before anyone can install this system in a real car. There is concern that scents may remain if the fan or seals fail to function properly when the unit is frequently utilized. Emptying the tank is also a bother, whether at the gas station or at home. If you’re sharing a car with a group of people, you might be afraid to take turns in such a small place, and there’s also the question of how well it will withstand all of the road’s bumps.


Seres hasn’t said whether they intend to manufacture any automobiles with this system in them. Patents don’t always come to fruition, therefore there’s a high risk this idea will go unnoticed. Nonetheless, it’s a creative solution to a problem that almost every driver has encountered at some point. If it ever gets it out of the design phase, road vacations may not be such a burden.
[Source]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Tesla is rolling out its Robotaxi service to Dallas and Houston

Published

on

Tesla is expanding its Robotaxi footprint across Texas by introducing availability in both Dallas and Houston. As announced in a post on X, the EV maker is rolling out its Robotaxis to small sections of the Texas cities, as detailed by two maps of its new service areas.

The first Robotaxi rides started in Austin, Texas where Tesla is headquartered, but the service’s launch was paired with a “Tesla Safety Monitor,” or a supervising human in the passenger seat. Earlier this year, Tesla began to transition away from including safety monitors, leaving its Robotaxis to operate unsupervised and fully autonomous. In the latest announcement on X, Tesla also showed off a 360-degree panning shot with no safety monitor, but the company hasn’t stated if its Dallas and Houston service will have in-car human supervision. It’s worth nothing that Tesla previously admitted that some of its Robotaxis are sometimes driven remotely by human operators.

With the Robotaxi expansion into Dallas and Houston, Tesla is encroaching on Waymo’s autonomous ride-hailing service that entered the same markets in February of this year. Looking ahead, Tesla is also targeting the Bay Area market in California for its Robotaxi expansion. While the company has received approvals to operate a ride-hailing service in California, it still doesn’t have authorization for autonomous taxis in the state yet.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The best robot vacuum in Australia: reliable, effective, effort-free automated cleaners

Published

on

Vacuuming is a chore, even if you use one of the best vacuums in Australia. If you want to make it as effortless as possible, investing in one of the best robot vacuums is the way to go.

The best robovacs available today are autonomous cleaners requiring minimal human intervention. They’re perfect for regular vacuuming and mopping, plus they can be scheduled for when you and the family will be away to minimise disrupting household activities.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025