Google launched a 99 dollar screenless fitness tracker and a 9.99 dollar per month AI health coach powered by Gemini. One day later, Whoop announced that it would add on-demand video consultations with licensed clinicians to its app. Google is betting that artificial intelligence can interpret your health data. Whoop is betting that you still need a doctor. The US Food and Drug Administration, which relaxed its oversight of both AI health tools and consumer wearables in January, is betting that neither needs much regulation.

The sequence is not a coincidence. It is a philosophical split in the wearable health industry, articulated in product announcements issued 24 hours apart. The question both companies are answering is the same: what should happen after the sensor on your wrist collects the data? Google’s answer is an AI chatbot. Whoop’s answer is a human with a medical licence. The market will decide which one people trust with their bodies.

The tracker

The Fitbit Air is a screenless band that costs 99 dollars. It is the smallest Fitbit ever made. It tracks heart rate, heart rate variability, SpO2, sleep stages, and activity continuously, with a battery life of approximately one week. It has no display. All data is accessed through the new Google Health app, which replaces the Fitbit app on 19 May.

The device ships on 26 May with a three-month free trial of Google Health Premium, which costs 9.99 dollars per month or 99 dollars per year. The premium tier includes the Google Health Coach, an AI assistant built on Gemini that generates personalised workout plans, interprets sleep trends, summarises health records, and answers questions about a user’s fitness and medical data.

Google’s strategy is not to sell hardware. It is to sell the AI layer on top of the data. The Google Health app is designed to be wearable-agnostic, with planned support for Apple Watch, Oura, and Garmin devices later this year. The Fitbit Air is the entry point, not the destination. Google wants to be the intelligence that sits between every wearable sensor and every health decision, regardless of which device collected the data.

The response

Whoop’s announcement arrived on 8 May, exactly one day after Google’s. The company will offer on-demand video consultations with licensed clinicians through its app for users in the United States, launching this summer. The consultations begin with a review of the user’s continuous biometric data collected by the Whoop band. If the user has synced blood work or medical history through HealthEx, an electronic health records integration that Whoop is also launching, that information is included.

The distinction from Google’s approach is deliberate. A clinician can ask follow-up questions, identify patterns that require context a chatbot does not have, and carry the professional accountability that comes with a medical licence. An AI coach can tell you your heart rate variability is trending down. A doctor can tell you why.

Blossom Health raised 20 million dollars to put AI copilots alongside psychiatrists, a model that treats AI as support for clinicians rather than a replacement for them. Whoop is applying the same logic to wearable health data: the AI processes the numbers, but a human makes the call.

Will Ahmed, Whoop’s founder and chief executive, posted an image on X of a Whoop circuit board with the words “Don’t bother copying us, we will win” engraved on it. The message was originally aimed at Amazon, which launched and subsequently killed the Halo fitness band. It now reads as a response to a company with considerably more resources than Amazon’s wearables division.

The economics

Whoop raised 575 million dollars in March 2026 at a valuation of 10.1 billion dollars, with investors including the Qatar Investment Authority, Mubadala, Abbott, and the Mayo Clinic. The company reported 1.1 billion dollars in annualised revenue in 2025, up 103 per cent year over year, and said it was cash-flow positive. It has more than 2.5 million members.

Whoop’s subscription costs between 199 and 359 dollars per year depending on the tier. Google Health Premium costs 99 dollars per year. The Fitbit Air costs 99 dollars. A year of Fitbit Air plus Google Health Premium costs less than a year of Whoop’s cheapest plan. The clinician consultations that Whoop is adding will cost extra, with pricing not yet announced.

The price gap frames the competitive question. Google is offering AI health coaching at a price point that undercuts Whoop’s subscription by more than half. Whoop is offering human medical consultations at a price that will push its total cost higher. One company is driving the cost of health guidance toward zero. The other is arguing that the value of a human clinician justifies a premium. Both positions are coherent. Neither has been tested at scale in the wearable market.

The field

ChatGPT Health launched in January 2026, connecting Apple Health data to OpenAI’s models. Microsoft followed a week later with Copilot Health. Perplexity launched Perplexity Health, pulling together electronic health records, wearable data, and lab results into a single AI-powered dashboard. Amazon opened its Health AI to all US customers, backed by its One Medical clinical network and pharmacy.

Every major AI platform now has a health product. The wearable data that Fitbit, Whoop, Apple Watch, and Oura collect has become the input for a competition between AI models, each promising to turn continuous biometric monitoring into personalised health advice. The differentiation is not in the data. Heart rate, sleep stages, and SpO2 are measured by every device on the market. The differentiation is in what happens next.

Corti’s Symphony AI outperformed models from OpenAI and Anthropic on medical coding benchmarks, demonstrating that specialised health AI can exceed general-purpose models on clinical tasks. The implication for the wearable market is that the AI interpreting your health data may matter more than the sensor collecting it. Google is building that AI into a consumer subscription. Whoop is routing around it to a human.

The regulation

In January 2026, the FDA updated two guidance documents that collectively loosened oversight of both consumer wearables and AI-enabled health tools. The General Wellness Guidance clarified that low-risk wellness devices using optical sensing to estimate physiological parameters, which describes every screenless fitness tracker on the market, can be sold without premarket review as long as they make wellness claims rather than clinical ones. The Clinical Decision Support Guidance softened the agency’s approach to AI tools that help users navigate diagnoses and health decisions.

The regulatory shift creates space for both Google and Whoop. Google’s AI health coach can offer personalised guidance without triggering medical device classification, provided it frames its outputs as wellness advice. Whoop’s clinician consultations operate under existing telemedicine frameworks. The FDA’s position is that neither the AI chatbot nor the wearable sensor requires the level of scrutiny applied to medical devices, as long as neither claims to diagnose or treat disease.

The gap between what these products do and what they claim to do is where the regulatory question lives. An AI coach that tells a user their recovery score suggests they should rest is wellness advice. An AI coach that tells a user their heart rate variability pattern is consistent with early atrial fibrillation is a clinical claim. The line between the two is a sentence, and the incentive to cross it increases with every subscription dollar at stake.

Google built a 99 dollar tracker and a 9.99 dollar AI coach. Whoop is adding doctors to an app attached to a 10 billion dollar company. The FDA says both are fine. The user strapping a screenless band to their wrist and asking what their data means will not be choosing between two products. They will be choosing between two theories of what health data is for: a prompt for an algorithm, or a conversation with a person who went to medical school.

A 34-year-old Virginia man was found guilty of conspiring to destroy dozens of government databases after getting fired from his job as a federal contractor.

In 2016, Sohaib Akhter and his twin brother and co-defendant Muneeb Akhter were also sentenced to several years in prison after pleading guilty to accessing U.S. State Department systems without authorization and stealing the personal information of dozens of co-workers and a federal law enforcement agent who was investigating their crimes.

After serving their sentences, the two brothers were rehired as government contractors by a company that worked with more than 45 federal agencies and hosted government data on servers in Ashburn.

“When the company discovered Sohaib Akhter’s felony conviction, it terminated both brothers’ employment during an online remote meeting on Feb. 18, 2025,” the Justice Department said. “Immediately after being fired during this meeting, the brothers sought to harm their employer and its U.S. government customers by accessing computers without authorization, write-protecting databases, deleting databases, and destroying evidence of their unlawful activities.”

In November 2025, Muneeb and Sohaib were again charged with destruction of records, aggravated identity theft, computer fraud, and theft of government information.

According to court documents, the two brothers wiped roughly 96 government databases within several hours in February 2025, including sensitive investigative documents from multiple federal agencies and Freedom of Information Act records. Additionally, immediately after deleting a Department of Homeland Security database, they also allegedly asked an artificial intelligence assistant how to clear system logs.

Prosecutors added that they allegedly ran commands to prevent others from modifying the targeted databases before deletion, and destroyed evidence of their activities. The men also discussed cleaning out their house in anticipation of a potential law enforcement search and wiped company laptops before returning them to their employer.

“As proven at trial, Akhter participated in the unauthorized access of protected computer systems, the theft of credentials, and the destruction of government data affecting numerous federal agencies,” said Inspector General Jennifer L. Fain of FDIC-OIG.

“The deliberate deletion of databases containing sensitive government information and the subsequent attempts to conceal that criminal activity demonstrated a blatant disregard for the security and integrity of federal information systems.”

Sohaib Akhter will be sentenced on September 9, 2026, and is facing a maximum penalty of 21 years in prison.

His brother, Muneeb Akhter, also faces a maximum of 45 years for two counts of computer fraud, conspiring to commit computer fraud and destroy records, two counts of aggravated identity theft, and theft of U.S. government records.

AI chained four zero-days into one exploit that bypassed both renderer and OS sandboxes. A wave of new exploits is coming.

At the Autonomous Validation Summit (May 12 & 14), see how autonomous, context-rich validation finds what’s exploitable, proves controls hold, and closes the remediation loop.

Advertisement

Claim Your Spot

from the scattered-to-the-wind dept

By now you likely have caught wind of GameStop, the video game and collectables retailer, announcing a bid to buy eBay. Perhaps you heard of this, as I did, because of GameStop’s CEO, Ryan Cohen, showing up to CNBC’s Squawk Box program where he pulled off one of the strangest interviews about business I’ve ever seen.

In a six-minute interview with CNBC‘s Andrew Ross Sorkin, Cohen gave a series of mostly incoherent responses to the most basic questions, unable to provide any decipherable reasons why a flailing video game retail chain that’s relied on meme stocks and Pokémon cards for its recent survival would even think of trying to buy a massively larger, international e-commerce company. When asked by CNBC, “So you’ve built up a stake in this company already, you’ve had conversations with the company? You’ve tried? What’s happening here?” there’s a deeply awkward pause before Cohen, in his mid-life-crisis black leather jacket, says “…No.” Then after another glacial pause, “We’re just starting,” followed by a very peculiar smirk.

It got stranger and more passive aggressive from there. Cohen indicated that through a stock issuance the company would directly put up $20 billion for the purchase, along with another $20 billion from investors. The problem is that the eBay purchase would require roughly $56 billion. It doesn’t take a professor in advanced mathematics to see the issue here.

Cohen seemed to approach the entire interview with an affected air of disgust and disdain, as if it’s just so beneath him to even have to answer questions based on his announcements. The mini-Musk rolls his eyes and glibly dismisses reasonable questions, which was going badly enough until Sorkin asked the most obvious question of all: “How does the math math?” How does around $20 billion from GameStop and $20 billion from an investor get close to $56 billion? “Half cash, half stock” Cohen replies, after more eye rolling and disdain. And then he appears to get stuck in a loop, like a rubbish sleepy robot.

Watch the entire interview if you like, but it’s pretty hard to get through it, honestly.

Going along with that very bizarre interview was the sudden appearance of all kinds of video game memorabilia, with some of it appearing to come directly from the “vault” that had been kept by GameStop’s Game Informer magazine, before Cohen shuttered it.

The stunt follows criticisms that the executive doesn’t have enough cash to actually make that acquisition. But it appears that at least some of the items being auctioned could be remnants looted from the legendary Game Informer Vault, where the long-running publication housed decades of video game history before GameStop shut down the publication in 2024.

Sources close to the situation who spoke under the condition of anonymity told Kotaku that while some of the products in Cohen’s eBay listings, such as the baseball cards, weren’t from the Game Informer Vault, other items, including some rare retro games, likely were. Some details like the sticky tab on the front of the sealed copy of Dracula for the NES and the sealed casings on copies of Yoshi’s Cookie and F1 Pole Position match photos and descriptions from the Vault verified by Kotaku.

Now, the Kotaku article suggests that Cohen is selling these items as an effort to raise money for the eBay bid. That’s a very silly thing to suggest. We’re talking about a $16 billion shortfall, unless Cohen plans to seriously dilute the stock value of current shareholders. Historical gaming items like we’re talking about, while certainly of import and value, aren’t going to net you $16 billion.

But it’s worth noting how cavalier Cohen is being here with very real gaming history and culture. It’s not surprise that the Video Game History Foundation and others are pointing out how an eBay auction like this is going to scatter all of this cultural history to the wind, and what a shame that is.

Video Game History Foundation founder Frank Cifaldi posted on Bluesky accusing Cohen of selling off items from the Vault. Though Game Informer has since returned as a print publication after the outlet was acquired and revived by Gunzilla Games in 2025, the Vault and all the contents found inside remained GameStop property.

“I’m very happy Game Informer is out from under GameStop, but choices like these remind people of the brutal closure of the magazine in 2024,” MinnMax founder and ex-Game Informer video producer Ben Hanson said in a statement to Kotaku. “Game Informer‘s history belongs in a museum, not some schmuck’s eBay listings. Show some love to the current Game Informer crew, subscribe to the physical magazine, and please try to ignore Ryan Cohen’s pleas for attention.”

Will GameStop actually buy eBay? I very much doubt it. I don’t think the company can pull off this kind of leverage while maintaining a credit rating post-acquisition that would satisfy the banking investment requirements as outlined in Cohen’s own financing letter. Moody’s doesn’t seem to think so, either.

Somewhat hilariously, Cohen’s own eBay account was also suspended shortly after he began auctioning these items off. But if he really wants to sell off the Game Informer vault, he’ll find a way. And that is a damned shame from a gaming preservation standpoint.

Filed Under: ryan cohen, wtf

Companies: ebay, gamestop

Last month, NASA astronaut Chris Williams floated aboard the Crew Dragon Freedom, pointing his camera out the window. What he photographed shows our planet enveloped in a delicate ribbon of light, called airglow, with the Milky Way arching overhead like a faint road through the stars. The photograph, shot on April 13 while the spacecraft was docked to the International Space Station, provides a clear view of something that occurs high above us every night.

Earth softly curves over the bottom of the frame, with brown and reddish land extending out next to patches of deep blue ocean, all speckled with beautiful white clouds. A thin, consistent ribbon of green and yellow hugs the edge of the atmosphere, where the planet meets empty space. Above that ribbon, the sky becomes absolutely dark, with thousands of sharp stars. The Milky Way traces a wide, hazy path across the top, with dense star fields and dark dust lanes easily visible.

Sale

Gskyer Telescope, 70mm Aperture 400mm AZ Mount Astronomical Refracting Telescope for Kids Beginners…

• Superior Optics: 400mm(f/5.7) focal length and 70mm aperture, fully coated optics glass lens with high transmission coatings creates stunning images…
• Magnification: Come with two replaceable eyepieces and one 3x Barlow lens.3x Barlow lens trebles the magnifying power of each eyepiece. 5×24 finder…
• Wireless Remote: This refractor telescope includes one smart phone adapter and one Wireless camera remote to explore the nature of the world easily…

Williams captured the image from the zenith docking port on the night side of the orbit. The window frame and a bit of the station’s solar array emerge at the borders, reminding viewers that this sight came from a small spacecraft hundreds of miles high. The camera was pointed at the horizon, where the glow is greatest, so no city lights appear. Instead, the attention is on the natural light that surrounds the entire globe.

That light is known as airglow, since sunlight penetrates the upper atmosphere during the day and provides energy to the atoms and molecules that float there. After sunset, such particles gradually release their additional energy as weak photons. The procedure creates the colored layers that Williams recorded. Green and yellow tones are most common because oxygen and nitrogen react in different ways at different heights. The effect is similar to the soft brightness inside a glow stick after snapping it, but on a planetary scale and driven by ordinary daylight rather than chemicals.

People occasionally mix airglow with the brighter curtains of an aurora. Both include charged particles emitting light, while airglow relies on consistent solar energy that arrives each day. Auroras require bursts of solar wind to light up. Airglow is always present, but it is too dim for most ground viewers to see unless the sky are very black and the camera exposure is long.

Williams later explained that the night side of the orbit is comparable to standing in one of Earth’s most isolated dark-sky locations. The station’s path allows him to observe stars in both the northern and southern sky at the same time. In his words, the view of the galactic plane is clear because nothing in the thin air above obscures the distant stars. This single frame combines those details: the planet’s curve, the luminous atmosphere shell, and the galaxy beyond.
[Source]

Man on Fire is a story that first hit my radar, like many of you, when Denzel Washington stepped into the role of former CIA operative John Creasy in Tony Scott’s 2004 action film. The story of that film, like Netflix‘s new thriller, draws inspiration from A. J. Quinnell’s book of the same name — which is the first entry in the five-book series.

For all intents and purposes, the 2004 film is a solid adaptation, and thanks to the performances of Washington (who plays Creasy) and a young Dakota Fanning, it has stood the test of time and remains a quality actioner to dig into.

Also, potentially like many of you, I’m shocked to say that Netflix’s episodic adaptation of Quinnell’s work is far superior. 

If you’ve paid attention to the numbers, you already know that Man on Fire hit the top of Netflix’s streaming charts with a whopping 11 million views in the show’s first four days on the platform. It was this news that nudged me to give the show a try — and I was immediately hooked.

Read more: 40 of the Best Movies on Netflix You Should Stream Now

Netflix’s Man on Fire isn’t a retread of the 2004 movie because the series loosely adapts the original material. Taking a note from shows of a similar ilk, like Reacher and Cross, Man on Fire takes its own creative liberties while using the books as a narrative foundation. And it works brilliantly.

This Man on Fire takes to the streets of Brazil, altering the conflict of the original story, while adhering to the basics of a weathered man doing anything and everything to protect a girl who’s being hunted by gangs and terrorists hell-bent on killing her. That’s just one piece to an intricate and violent puzzle. 

If it sounds heavy, that’s because it is. But thanks to smart writing and the emotional resonance of the cast performances, the movie is as engaging and heartfelt as it is bloody. 

You want to watch this beatdown man get lit on fire for this purpose — it’s Death Wish for a whole new generation.

Abdul-Mateen stars as Creasy in this rendition, which shifts the character’s backstory from CIA officer to PTSD-stricken Special Forces operative, and from the get-go, the emotional stakes are viscerally there. They steadily ramp up through each episode, justifying Creasy’s Jack Bauer-style actions, all with the motivations of enforcing justice and eliminating every evildoer he crosses paths with.

Abdul-Mateen holds his own in the role, quickly eliminating the remnants of Washington’s performance two decades earlier. And that’s no easy undertaking. Yet, as we’ve seen with the roles the actor has taken, from Dr. Manhattan in HBO’s Watchmen to playing Candyman in the 2021 horror remake and Wonder Man earlier this year on Disney Plus, he’s got range and a top-tier skill of wearing his heart on his sleeve, no matter what his character must do on screen. 

In short, you can’t help but root for Abdul-Mateen, which means it’s nearly impossible to not root for Creasy.

It doesn’t stop with him, though. Every actor that graces the screen in Man on Fire is legit (as the kids say) fire. Bobby Cannavale dips in for a hot second to remind everyone of how great he is. Alice Braga, as Valeria, serves as a supportive counterpoint to Creasy’s hotheaded actions.

It’s Billie Boullet as Poe, the teenage girl Creasy protects from every possible danger, who steals the show, though. She’s got the same sort of wide-eyed emotional resonance Fanning had opposite Washington, yet it hits different and better here. She’s notably older than Fanning was, and the character she’s playing is a departure from earlier portrayals. That only works to her benefit, allowing her to find her own emotional footholds in the character. Boullet paired with Abdul-Mateen is a perfect match, full stop.

Instead of taking place in Mexico City, where Washington unleashed hell in the Tony Scott movie, this rendition sends Creasy to Brazil. The Netflix series shows off the beautiful, tourist-friendly areas of the country, then flips it, shoving us deep into the favelas to explore an often misrepresented culture. 

The entire time I watched the show, I found myself leaning in close to take in the surroundings of each scene. Was this shot in a studio in front of a blue screen or on location? I’m pleased to say it was shot in multiple urban landscapes, like Mexico City and Rio de Janeiro. That tactile authenticity brings the story to life in a necessary way, embracing its realness rather than re-creating it in post.

Oh, and did I mention how action-packed and violent the show is? I did, but it bears repeating. 

This is Jason Bourne-style action, in the form of a TV show where each episode runs approximately 40 minutes. If ever there was a way to guarantee my attention and keep me glued to the screen for hours on end, everything I just mentioned — from the writing to the acting and the viscera in between — adds up to the perfect formula to do just that. If you’re anything like me and you’ve read this far (so I assume you are), you’ll feel the exact same way.

After three people died on a cruise ship struck by a hantavirus, authorities are actively tracking down 29 people who had left the ship. They’re trying to trace the spread of the virus. It’s a long, arduous, global process to find and notify people who might be at risk of infection.

Hey, wasn’t there supposed to be an app for that?

Contact-tracing apps were a global effort starting in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic. Enabled by phone companies like Apple and Google, contact tracing was designed to use Bluetooth connections to detect when people had come in contact with someone who had or would later test positive for Covid and report as much. It didn’t do much to solve the spread of the pandemic, but tracking the virus became more effective at least. The same process wouldn’t go well for the hantavirus problem.

“There is no use of apps for this hantavirus outbreak,” Emily Gurley, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University, wrote in an email response to WIRED. “The number of cases are small, and it’s important to trace all contacts exactly to stop transmission.”

On a smaller scale of infection like this, officials have to start at the source (an infected individual), then go person-by-person, confirming where they went and who they might have come into contact with. Data collected by apps from a broad swath of devices would not be anywhere close to accurate enough to give a good idea of where the virus might have hitchhiked to next.

Contact tracing on a wider scale, like, say, a global pandemic, is less about tracking the individual infections and more about understanding what parts of the population might be affected, giving people the opportunity to self-quarantine after exposure. But that depends on how people choose to respond, and how the technology is utilized by public emergency systems. During the Covid pandemic, contact-tracing via apps tended to work better in more carefully managed European countries, but did not slow the spread in the US.

Making devices accessible to that kind of proximity information has also brought all sorts of concerns about privacy, given that the technology would require always-on access to work properly. Contact tracing also struggled to maintain accuracy, and in some cases could be providing false negatives or positives that don’t help further real information about the spread of the virus.

Especially in the case of something like the Hantavirus, where every person on that cruise ship can theoretically be directly tracked and contacted, it’s better to do that process the hard way.

“During small but highly fatal outbreaks, more precision is required,” Gurley wrote.

Today’s El Clasico live stream sees the La Liga title up for grabs at the Camp Nou, with Barcelona requiring only a point to seal the crown and Real Madrid needing nothing less than a victory.

A second-straight La Liga may now be a virtual certainty for Hansi Flick’s Barcelona, but it would be even sweeter to seal things on Sunday against their fiercest foes. The race was pretty tight for much of the season, before Robert Lewandowski, Raphinha and co. went on a 10-game winning streak to catapult themselves into pole position.

Marshals, a new Yellowstone spinoff starring Luke Grimes as Kayce Dutton, is airing on CBS right now. You can also tune in with Paramount Plus. The Yellowstone sequel series sees Grimes’ former Navy SEAL join an elite unit of US Marshals to bring range justice to Montana, according to a synopsis from CBS.

The show includes Yellowstone actors Gil Birmingham as Thomas Rainwater, Mo Brings Plenty as Mo and Brecken Merrill as Tate. Spencer Hudnut is the showrunner of Marshals — formerly known as Y: Marshals — and Taylor Sheridan is an executive producer.

When to watch new Marshals episodes on Paramount Plus

Episode 11 of Marshals airs on CBS on Sunday, May 10. Viewing options for Paramount Plus customers vary by subscription tier. You can watch the episode live if you have Paramount Plus Premium, which includes your local CBS station. If you subscribe to Paramount Plus Essential, you can watch the installment on demand the following Monday, but not live on Sunday.

Here’s a release schedule for the next three episodes of Marshals.

• Episode 11, On Thin Ice: Premieres on CBS/Paramount Plus Premium on May 10 at 8 p.m. ET/8 p.m. PT/7 p.m. CT. Streams on Paramount Plus Essential on May 11.
• Episode 12, The Devil at Home: Premieres on CBS/Paramount Plus Premium on May 17 at 8 p.m. ET/8 p.m. PT/7 p.m. CT. Streams on Paramount Plus Essential on May 18.
• Episode 13, Wolves at the Door: Premieres on CBS/Paramount Plus Premium on May 24 at 8 p.m. ET/8 p.m. PT/7 p.m. CT. Streams on Paramount Plus Essential on May 25.

You can also watch CBS and the eleventh episode of Marshals without cable with a live TV streaming service such as YouTube TV, Hulu Plus Live TV or the DirecTV MyNews skinny bundle. In addition to offering a lower-cost option, Paramount Plus lets you watch the other two Yellowstone spinoffs: the prequels 1883 and 1923.

Advertisement

After a price increase in early 2026, the ad-supported Essential version runs $9 per month or $90 per year. The ad-free Premium version runs $14 per month or $140 per year. Paying more for Premium gives you downloads, the ability to watch more Showtime programming than Essential and access to your live, local CBS station.