Crypto World
Bitcoin Price Prediction: Will BTC Hold? Or A Drop Is Inevitable?
Bitcoin (BTC) price is struggling to maintain footing above $68,000 today, down 1% as the prediction of selling pressure mounts following a rigid rejection at the $76,000 ceiling a week ago. The market leader is currently navigating a perilous consolidation phase analysts call a “No-Trade Zone,” where conflicting signals between derivatives data and spot buying are creating high volatility.
The rejection at higher levels coincides with a distinct shift in institutional sentiment, evidenced by ETF flows showing signs of reversal amid broader geopolitical uncertainty.
On-chain data from Santiment reveals that large wallet holders, specifically those with significant BTC balances, trimmed positions on the 22nd, dropping collective holdings from 1.15 million to 1.14 million BTC. This distribution suggests that without a decisive catalyst, the path of least resistance remains sideways to down.
Can BTC Hold the $65,000 Support Level Amid Bear Flag Fears?
Bitcoin price technical structure on the 1-day chart presents a precarious setup for bullish prediction. Trading just above $68,000, BTC is oscillating within a narrowing range defined by fading buyer strength.
The immediate concern is the massive volume node between the $70,700 and $63,500 area, where approximately 1.72 million BTC have been transacted. This range acts as a critical battleground; a loss of the lower bound could trigger a cascading liquidation event.
Technically, the formation of a bear flag following the recent 39% flagpole decline raises the risk of a deeper capitulation. If sellers force a daily close below the $63,700 trigger level, Fibonacci extension targets suggest downside exposure toward $57,000 and potentially $52,700.
Conversely, momentum indicators like the RSI are flattening, hinting at a potential hidden divergence that typically precedes a reversal, but confirmation is absent. (Where are the bulls waiting? Likely at the 200-day SMA near $93k or lower trendline support.
For the bullish case to regain validity, price action must decisively reclaim the $71,000 mid-range resistance. Until then, the divergence between stabilizing smaller wallets (1k-10k BTC) and profit-taking mega-whales paints a picture of a market in conflict, often resulting in extended consolidation before the next major impulse.
Discover: The Best New Crypto
Bitcoin Price Prediction Is Down, But Investors Rotate to Infrastructure as Hyper Targets SVM Scalability
While spot Bitcoin struggles with overhead resistance, smart money creates a noticeable trend of capital rotation into high-beta infrastructure plays. Investors often hedge against mainnet chop by allocating to Layer 2 protocols that promise to solve Bitcoin’s velocity constraints. Leading this surge is Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 to integrate the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).
The project has defied the broader market pullback, amassing an impressive $32 Million in its ongoing presale. Bitcoin Hyper aims to deliver sub-second finality and high-speed smart contracts directly to the Bitcoin ecosystem, effectively bridging the gap between Bitcoin’s security and Solana’s speed. Current data prices $HYPER at $0.0136 with 36% APY on staking rewards.
This massive fundraising milestone indicates that investors are rotating toward infrastructure capable of unlocking trillions in dormant BTC capital. By utilizing a Decentralized Canonical Bridge, Bitcoin Hyper allows seamless asset transfers, addressing the critical lack of programmability on the main chain. While emerging Layer 2s carry inherent execution risks, the sheer volume of capital raised suggests the market views SVM integration as a necessary evolution for Bitcoin.
Those looking to position themselves before next-generation L2s go live can research Bitcoin Hyper here.
The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Will BTC Hold? Or A Drop Is Inevitable? appeared first on Cryptonews.
TRON DAO has scaled up its artificial intelligence fund by a factor of ten, from $100 million to $1 billion, targeting investments in and acquisitions of early-stage startups building core infrastructure for the agentic economy.
The billion-dollar fund, announced on Monday, will focus investments in four areas: agent identity systems, stablecoin-based payment rails, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and developer tooling for autonomous financial systems.
The expansion is built on Tron DAO’s theses dating back to 2023, which foresees stablecoins becoming the practical medium of exchange between AI agents, stablecoins becoming the natural payment layer for “AI-augmented people,” and the rise of tokenized equity.
Blockchains race to support agentic AI
Tron is just one of many crypto-native ecosystems to expand investment into AI by targeting the agentic payment economy. Solana and Base have also made moves to expand into this nascent field; others recently include Visa, Stripe, and World.
In September, the Ethereum Foundation formally entered the agentic AI race with the launch of the “dAI Team,” which aims to make Ethereum the “preferred settlement and coordination layer” for AI agents and the machine economy.
However, it is a notable contrast to TRON’s approach as Ethereum is positioning itself as a trust and coordination layer rather than a payments rail, leaning into its decentralization ethos rather than competing on speed and fees.
Tron scaling to support AI agents, Justin Sun says
Tron said its blockchain is positioned to serve the future agentic economy with 370 million user accounts, more than $21 billion in daily transaction volume, and over $85 billion in circulating USDt (USDT).
Tron founder Justin Sun previously told Cointelegraph that many AI agent use cases involve small, frequent transactions, “which require networks that are fast and inexpensive to use.”
Average confirmation times are about three seconds on TRON, compared with roughly 12 seconds on Ethereum, “making it well-suited for high-frequency transactions,” he said, citing an Arkham report.
Related: Agentic AI commerce may spell the end of internet ads: a16z Crypto
Regarding scaling, he said the real question is what happens if AI agents move from a handful of applications to mainstream machine-to-machine commerce.
“To support this shift, infrastructure is beginning to develop around the ecosystem,” he continued, mentioning an AI agent framework recently launched on TRON called AINFT, which is designed to help developers build and deploy autonomous agents.
Magazine: Google flags crypto malware, retiree loses $840K in ‘expert’ scam: Hodler’s Digest
Monday’s ceasefire trade lasted about 18 hours.
Bitcoin climbed 3.1% to $70,352 on Tuesday morning, recovering from the weekend’s slide below $68,000, with ether (ETH), solana’s SOL, dogecoin and xrp gaining between 2-4%.
The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that Saudi Arabia has agreed to give the U.S. military access to King Fahd Air Base, reversing its earlier position that its bases couldn’t be used to attack Iran. The UAE has taken similar steps.
Gulf states joining the war directly would transform the conflict from a U.S.-Israel operation into a broader regional coalition, a significant escalation from what markets had been pricing.
Iran’s deputy speaker ruled out talks with the U.S., echoing the Fars news agency denial from Monday evening. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively shut with only a trickle of vessels making their way through.
Traditional markets responded immediately. S&P 500 futures fell 0.5%. European shares were set to drop 0.8% at the open. Brent crude jumped 4% to about $104. The dollar strengthened 0.3%. Gold fell 1.5%, extending what is now its longest daily losing streak on record.
The gold collapse continues to be the most disorienting signal in global markets. A safe-haven asset falling to record losing streaks during an active and widening war breaks every historical precedent.
The most likely explanation is forced selling by funds facing margin calls across other positions, with gold being the most liquid asset to sell. But whatever the cause, it makes bitcoin’s relative stability even more notable. The token that’s supposed to be the volatile one is holding a range while the one that’s supposed to be steady is in freefall.
The five-day window Trump gave Iran expires Saturday, but Saudi Arabia joining the conflict changes the calculus entirely. A regional coalition fighting Iran is a different war from a U.S.-Israel air campaign, and it puts oil infrastructure on both sides of the Gulf at risk.
Bitcoin is holding $70,000 on a Tuesday morning where everything else is deteriorating. Whether that’s resilience or just the market waiting for the next headline to react to is the question the rest of the week will answer.
Bitcoin’s mining concentration problem just showed up on the blockchain itself, triggering a small “reorg.”
Foundry USA, the largest bitcoin mining pool, produced seven consecutive blocks late on Monday and in the process orphaned two valid blocks mined by AntPool and ViaBTC.
Think of it as two checkout lines opening at the same time in a busy store. At first, both lines are moving, but suddenly, one of the line starts clearing customers faster. This leads everyone to shift to the faster line and the slower one gets abandoned.
That’s essentially what happened here: Dominant pool Foundry’s “line” moved ahead quickly with several blocks in a row, so the network followed it, leaving the other valid blocks by AntPool and ViaBTC behind.
Bitcoin miners compete to add new blocks of transactions to the blockchain, and sometimes two miners find a valid block at nearly the same time. When that happens, the network briefly splits, but it ultimately chooses one chain to continue – usually the one that grows faster.
A mining pool, such as Foundry, is a group of miners who combine their computing power to mine blocks and split the rewards,. Finding a block solo is like winning a lottery that individual miners can rarely win on their own.
Bitcoin’s consensus rule is absolute: the chain with the most cumulative proof of work wins. AntPool and ViaBTC’s two blocks became stale, permanently erased from the ledger, and those miners earned nothing for producing them.
The event was a 2-block chain reorganization, rare but not unprecedented, and the clearest on-chain signal yet that hashrate is concentrating into fewer hands as the industry contracts.
At block height 941,881, AntPool and Foundry found valid blocks within 12 seconds of each other, at 15:49:35 and 15:49:47 UTC respectively. Both were legitimate and the network briefly split, with some nodes following one chain and others following the other.
The race continued to block 941,882, where ViaBTC extended AntPool’s chain and Foundry extended its own.
That created two competing chains, each two blocks deep, running in parallel. Later on, blocks 941,883 through 941,886 all went to Foundry, making their chain the heaviest by a wide margin.
Transactions in the orphaned blocks weren’t lost, however. They return to the mempool and get included in future blocks. An orphaned block is a valid block that loses the race when two miners find blocks at nearly the same time, getting discarded permanently from the chain despite being perfectly legitimate.
Mining difficulty just dropped 7.76% on Saturday, the second-largest negative adjustment of 2026. Hashrate has retreated to roughly 920 EH/s from the 1 zetahash record hit in 2025.
Smaller and mid-sized miners are exiting because bitcoin at $70,000 sits well below the estimated $88,000 average production cost. Every operator that shuts down concentrates the remaining hashrate into fewer pools.
A 2-block reorg doesn’t threaten Bitcoin’s security. The network handled it exactly as designed, with the longer chain winning and consensus re-establishing within minutes.
But when fewer pools control more hashrate, the probability of a single pool finding multiple consecutive blocks increases, and with it the probability of competing chains when two large pools find blocks near-simultaneously.
Two leading prediction-market platforms have rolled out tighter guardrails on Monday to curb insider trading and suspected market manipulation in event-based contracts, as lawmakers in Washington step up scrutiny of a sector that blends finance, law and politics.
Kalshi and Polymarket argued that their updates are designed to prevent the exploitation of confidential information and to reduce the risk that markets skew the outcomes of real-world events. The moves come amid a broader policy push in the United States to regulate or restrict prediction markets that resemble gambling or sports betting.
Key takeaways
- Kalshi and Polymarket introduced new guardrails to combat insider trading and manipulation in event contracts.
- Kalshi will preemptively bar political candidates from trading on their campaigns and exclude individuals connected to college and professional sports from relevant markets.
- Polymarket expanded prohibitions to forbid trades based on stolen confidential information or those who can influence market outcomes.
- A bipartisan bill, the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, would bar CFTC-registered platforms from listing event contracts that resemble sports bets or casino-style games.
- The policy debate highlights tensions over jurisdiction, licensing and the boundaries between financial markets and entertainment-oriented betting.
Guardrails tighten as Congresseye rules intensify
Kalshi said it would preemptively ban political candidates from trading on their own campaigns, along with individuals known to be involved in college and professional sports—such as athletes, staff, and referees. The exchange described the move as part of a long-running effort to align with evolving regulatory guidance and proposed legislation addressing insider trading and market manipulation in prediction markets.
In a separate but related move, Polymarket unveiled broader prohibitions intended to close loopholes that could enable insiders to benefit from confidential information or influence the outcome of a contract. The company said its updated rules aim to make the market more resistant to manipulation and to protect the integrity of events traded on its platform.
The changes come on the heels of intense public debate about whether some well-timed bets on political or geopolitical events reflect legitimate market activity or exploit privileged information. In recent coverage, observers noted bets placed around high-profile events such as U.S. and Israeli actions in Iran and a U.S.-led operation related to Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, with some traders appearing to use multiple accounts to mask activity. The Guardian reported that the Iran-strike bets were made by users who could be perceived as having inside information, underscoring the ongoing concerns about insider knowledge shaping market outcomes.
Kalshi described its policy evolution as a proactive response to the regulatory environment and to proposed congressional action. The company, which is a member of the Coalition for Prediction Markets, argued that these guardrails are part of preparing for potential legal guidance and legislative developments that address insider trading and market manipulation in prediction markets.
Policy spotlight: bipartisan efforts and legal tensions
On Monday, Democratic Senator Adam Schiff and Republican Senator John Curtis introduced a bipartisan bill, the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, that would bar Commodity Futures Trading Commission-registered entities from listing event contracts that resemble sports betting or casino-style games. In their view, sports prediction contracts are effectively sports bets—an assertion Schiff has repeated to emphasize the public-law implications of these instruments when they resemble gambling more than information-driven markets.
The proposed legislation would withdraw a key allowance for platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket by limiting what contracts they may offer in the United States. Schiff’s office framed the issue as one of regulatory clarity and consumer protection, while Curtis stressed maintaining state authority over broader gaming and betting activities.
Kalshi’s chief executive, Tarek Mansour, reacted to the bill by framing the move within a broader “casino lobby” effort. He argued that the legislation is not about protecting consumers but about preserving entrenched monopolies, a line he shared publicly on social media. His comments underscore how industry actors view the political dynamic surrounding prediction markets and their place in the U.S. financial-regulatory landscape.
Legal tension has already surrounded prediction-market operators in several states, which have asserted that sports-event contracts constitute gambling that requires a state license. Platforms such as Kalshi, Polymarket andCoinbase have contended that their offerings are not illegal betting and, regardless, fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than state authorities.
The policy debate is not theoretical for traders and developers who rely on prediction markets for hedging and information discovery. As reported by Cointelegraph, the U.S. Senate has been weighing bills aimed at curtailing or redefining the reach of these markets, alongside state-level actions that challenge the legality of specific contracts. The ongoing legal and regulatory discourse creates an environment of uncertainty, even as platforms push for clearer rules that would allow compliant operation in the United States.
For context, Cointelegraph’s reporting has highlighted instances where traders leveraged event-driven markets to capitalize on geopolitical developments, reinforcing concerns about information asymmetry and the potential for manipulation. The new guardrails by Kalshi and Polymarket are thus part of a broader effort to reconcile the commercial appeal of prediction markets with legitimate safeguards against abuse.
What to watch next in the evolving landscape
As lawmakers advance their proposals and courts consider disputes over jurisdiction and licensing, the trajectory of prediction markets in the United States remains uncertain. If the proposed act passes, CFTC-approved platforms could face tighter restrictions or even a narrowed set of permissible contracts, potentially dampening growth but improving trust and regulatory compliance.
For users, traders and builders, the key questions are how the guardrails translate into practical trading limits, whether state or federal rules will ultimately prevail, and how enforcement will unfold in a landscape that often intersects with political sentiment and sports governance.
The next chapter will likely hinge on legislative momentum in Congress and any legal clarifications from federal or state authorities. Watch for updates on whether the bipartisan bill gains traction, how the industry responds with further rule adjustments, and whether there are new developments in the ongoing legal actions against these platforms. The balance between innovation and integrity in prediction markets remains delicate, and investors should monitor both regulatory signals and platform-level safeguards as the market evolves.
Sources: Kalshi newsroom announcements on guardrails; Polymarket rule updates; U.S. Senate press releases announcing the proposed act; coverage of insider-trading concerns around event contracts; The Guardian reporting on Iran-strike bets; ongoing state-level legal actions against prediction-market operators.
Balancer Labs, the team behind the decentralized finance protocol Balancer, is shutting down after mounting financial pressure and a $116 million hack in November, with executives proposing continuation of the protocol under a leaner, more cost-effective structure.
“After careful consideration, I have decided to wind down Balancer Labs. This is not a decision I take lightly,” one of Balancer Protocol’s founders, Fernando Martinelli, said on Monday, adding that Balancer Labs has become a “liability rather than an asset to the protocol,” as it has been operating without revenue.
Balancer Labs CEO Marcus Hardt added that it was spending too much to attract liquidity relative to the revenue the protocol is making, a strategy that came at the cost of diluting Balancer (BAL) token holders.
Balancer was one of the more notable DeFi protocols during the 2020–2021 bull market, reaching a peak of $3.3 billion in total value locked (TVL) in November 2021.
However, that figure fell to $800 million by October 2025, with the hack leading to another $500 million TVL drop over the next two weeks. Balancer’s TVL has since fallen to $158 million, showing how challenging it is for DeFi protocols to recover from large-scale hacks.
Martinelli said the November exploit “created real and ongoing legal exposure” and that maintaining a corporate entity that carries the liability of past security incidents wasn’t sustainable.
Balancer Labs executives outline restructuring plan
Moving forward, Hardt and Martinelli are pushing for Balancer’s future to be managed by the Balancer Foundation and the protocol’s decentralized autonomous organization.
Martinelli advocated for Balancer to adopt a more “lean continuation path,” which involves cutting BAL emissions to zero, restructuring fees to enable Balancer’s DAO to capture more revenue, reducing the team as much as possible and targeting lower operating costs.
“Balancer still has real value to build from here. If we can make this transition work, we have a real chance to build a stronger and more sustainable protocol on the other side of it,” Hardt said.
Balancer DAO members have been asked to vote on two proposals reflecting possible changes in Balancer’s operational restructuring and BAL’s tokenomics.
Related: OP_NET launches Bitcoin DeFi push without bridges or wrapped BTC
Despite the tokenomics issues, Martinelli noted that Balancer is “still generating real revenue” at over $1 million across the past three months:
“That’s not nothing — that’s a functioning protocol buried under a broken tokenomics model and an overweight cost structure,” he said.
“The problem isn’t that Balancer doesn’t work. The problem is that the economics around Balancer aren’t working. Those are fixable.”
Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?
Two NYSE-linked exchanges have put new crypto ETF options rules into effect after filings cleared the SEC process.
Summary
- NYSE Arca and NYSE American removed position limits on options tied to 11 crypto ETFs.
- The SEC waived the usual waiting period, allowing the new crypto options rules to take effect immediately.
- The rule change gives institutions more flexibility and allows crypto ETF options to trade as FLEX contracts.
NYSE Arca and NYSE American removed the 25,000-contract position and exercise limit for options tied to 11 spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds, giving those products broader trading terms.
NYSE Arca filed its proposed rule change on March 10, 2026, to revise rules for options on certain crypto-linked ETFs. The filing covered products that had been trading under a 25,000-contract cap since their launch phases.
NYSE American filed a similar proposal on the same date. Its filing also removed the fixed 25,000-contract limit and updated the exchange’s rules so those options can follow the broader position-limit structure already used for other eligible products.
SEC waiver made the changes effective at once
Both filings became effective under Rule 19b-4(f)(6). In each case, the SEC said the standard 30-day operative delay could be waived because the changes aligned crypto ETF options rules with those used by other exchanges and did not create new regulatory issues.
The Federal Register notices state that the Commission designated both proposals to be operative upon filing. In the notices, the SEC wrote that waiving the delay was consistent with investor protection and the public interest, making the new rules active without waiting another month.
Furthermore, the rule changes affect 11 crypto ETF options. The list includes BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund, ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust, Bitwise Bitcoin ETF, Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, Bitwise Ethereum ETF, iShares Ethereum Trust ETF, and Fidelity Ethereum Fund.
Earlier filings had already removed some limits for a smaller group of Bitcoin ETF options, including GBTC, the Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust, Bitwise Bitcoin ETF, and IBIT. The new March 2026 changes extend similar treatment across the full set of listed crypto ETF options covered by these exchange rules.
FLEX options and larger positions now get more room
The updates also allow these crypto ETF options to trade as FLEX options under the revised rules. FLEX contracts let market participants customize terms such as strike prices, expiration dates, and exercise styles instead of using only standard listed terms.
NYSE American’s filing says the exchange wants these crypto asset options treated like other options for position, exercise, and FLEX trading purposes. A separate Nasdaq ISE proposal still seeks to raise the position limit for IBIT options to 1 million contracts, and that proposal remains under SEC review.
Crypto prices opened lower in Asia on Monday as fresh pressure from oil markets and geopolitical tension weighed on risk assets.
Summary
- Crypto prices dropped in Asia as war fears and oil market stress pressured investor sentiment again.
- Traders are watching PMI, jobless claims, and sentiment data for clues on rates inflation.
- Bitcoin and Ether weakened as rising energy costs and macro risks weighed on markets.
Meanwhile, investors are also watching a packed U.S. data calendar this week, with new reports on business activity, jobless claims, consumer sentiment, and inflation expectations due between March 23 and March 27.
Crypto markets faced renewed selling after conflict in the Middle East kept traders focused on energy supply risks. Reuters reported that U.S. stock futures fell as investors reacted to President Donald Trump’s 48-hour demand for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while Iran warned of retaliation if attacks hit its infrastructure.
Oil prices stayed elevated as the new week began. Brent crude at about $113.20 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate traded near $101.32. Higher oil prices have lifted concern about inflation and have pushed markets to reassess the path for interest rates.
Investors shift focus to economic data
The week’s economic calendar may shape trading across crypto and traditional markets. A Wall Street Journal report cited Deutsche Bank economists as saying,
“This is significant because it’s one of the first economic indicators we’ll get that cover the period since the conflict began,” referring to the March PMI data.
Thursday’s initial jobless claims report will offer another reading on labor market conditions. At the same time, markets are tracking whether inflation pressure from fuel costs could change expectations for Federal Reserve policy. Investors have sharply reduced hopes for rate cuts this year and are now pricing in a higher chance of a rate increase later in 2026.
Bitcoin and Ether trade lower in Asia
Bitcoin remained under pressure in Monday trading. Live market data showed Bitcoin (BTC) at around $68,400, while Ethereum (ETH) traded at $2,000. Both assets were down from recent highs as traders pulled back from risk during a weak start to the week.
Broader crypto market sentiment also softened as investors moved more carefully across global markets. Rising yields, weaker equities, and higher energy costs have added pressure across risk assets, including digital tokens.
Higher oil prices may feed through to household spending if the rally continues. CBS News quoted Oxford Economics chief global economist Ryan Sweet, who said,
“To kind of put it into context, every penny increase in gasoline prices reduces consumer spending by one and a half billion dollars over the course of a year.”
H100 Group has signed a letter of intent to buy Norwegian Bitcoin companies Moonshot AS and Never Say Die AS through an all-share deal.
Summary
- H100 plans an all-stock deal to acquire Moonshot and Never Say Die in Norway.
- The proposed acquisition could raise H100’s Bitcoin holdings to about 3,501 BTC total.
- If completed, H100 would become Europe’s second-largest listed Bitcoin treasury company by holdings.
If completed, the transaction would expand H100’s Bitcoin treasury and move the Sweden-listed company closer to the top tier of Europe’s public Bitcoin holders.
According to a press release, H100 said the proposed transaction would be carried out as a share-for-share acquisition. Under the plan, H100 would issue new shares to acquire all shares in Moonshot AS and Never Say Die AS, with no cash payment included in the structure.
The company said this setup is designed to keep the sellers exposed to Bitcoin through shares in a listed company. H100 added that the final terms will be set in definitive agreements, while the deal remains subject to due diligence, corporate approvals, and stock exchange requirements.
Bitcoin holdings could rise to about 3,501 BTC
Bitcointreasuries data shows H100 currently holds 1,051 BTC. The company said the two target firms hold about 2,450 BTC combined, which would bring the total to about 3,501 BTC if the acquisition closes.
That total would place H100 just behind Germany’s Bitcoin Group among Europe’s listed Bitcoin treasury companies. Bitcointreasuries ranks H100 44th among public Bitcoin treasury companies worldwide at present, and the added holdings would move it well above its current standing.
H100 chairman Sander Andersen said,
“Scale, credibility and access to capital markets are increasingly important in the Bitcoin space, and this transaction would strengthen H100 in these areas.”
That statement appeared in public reporting on the planned acquisition and outlined the company’s stated reason for the move.
The company has also completed the acquisition of Switzerland-based Future Holdings AG, showing that it is still building its Bitcoin treasury platform through deals. H100 said the new transaction would not change its listing structure or its role as the listed parent company.
AGM timing and share performance remain in focus
H100 expects to sign a definitive agreement by April 22. The company has said closing would come after its annual general meeting, but its current financial calendar lists the AGM on May 21, 2026.
The proposed deal comes while H100 shares remain under pressure and Bitcoin treasury companies continue to face a weaker market environment.
Bitcoin rose sharply on March 23 after U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington had held constructive talks with Iran and would pause planned military strikes for five days.
Summary
- Bitcoin rebounded from below $68,500 and briefly touched $71,500 after Trump announced a strike delay.
- Trump said US-Iran talks were productive and paused planned military action for five days.
- The rally liquidated nearly $270 million in short positions and pushed daily crypto liquidations higher.
The move lifted market sentiment after several sessions of pressure linked to Middle East tensions. The rebound also triggered a wave of short liquidations across the crypto market.
Bitcoin had fallen below $68,500 earlier in the session as traders reacted to geopolitical uncertainty and broader risk-off sentiment. The asset then reversed course within hours and climbed by about $3,000, reaching $71,500 before giving up part of the gain.
At the time of reporting, Bitcoin traded near $71,000. The move marked its first return to the $71,500 area since last Thursday and showed how quickly sentiment shifted after Trump’s latest comments on the Iran situation.
Trump said the United States and Iran had held “very good and productive conversations” over the previous two days. He also said he had instructed the “Department of War” to delay military action against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for five days while talks continue.
The statement pointed to a possible easing in tensions after weeks of conflict. It also came about 36 hours after Trump warned he would “obliterate” Iran if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened safely, making the change in tone a key factor in the market reaction.
Short traders face heavy losses
Bitcoin’s fast recovery caught bearish traders off guard. Data from CoinGlass showed that nearly $270 million in short positions were liquidated within the past hour as prices moved higher.
Total liquidations across the crypto market reached about $780 million by press time. More than 200,000 traders were liquidated over the same period, showing the scale of the sudden reversal and the pressure on leveraged positions.
Strategy added more bitcoin during the latest market pullback, extending a buying pattern that has continued through recent volatility and rising geopolitical tension.
Summary
- Strategy bought 1,031 BTC at $74,326, raising its total bitcoin holdings to 762,099 BTC.
- The latest purchase was smaller than last week’s 22,337 BTC acquisition worth $1.57 billion.
- Bitcoin fell below $70,000, leaving Strategy under pressure on its latest purchase during market volatility.
Meanwhile, the company disclosed that it bought 1,031 BTC for $76.6 million, bringing its total holdings to 762,099 BTC. The latest purchase came as bitcoin traded above $74,000 early last week before falling below $70,000 after the second Federal Open Market Committee meeting of the year.
Michael Saylor’s latest update showed that Strategy completed the purchase at an average price of $74,326 per bitcoin. Based on that entry level, the transaction likely took place during the first few business days of the previous week.
The new purchase lifted Strategy’s total bitcoin holdings to 762,099 BTC. The company has now spent about $57.69 billion building its bitcoin position, keeping its status as the largest corporate holder of the asset.
The latest acquisition was much smaller than the one Strategy announced a week earlier. In that earlier update, Saylor said the company had spent $1.57 billion to acquire 22,337 BTC.
Even so, the new purchase showed that Strategy has kept its regular buying approach in place. The company continues to announce bitcoin buys on Mondays, even as markets remain sensitive to macro and geopolitical developments.
Bitcoin price swings shape market backdrop
Bitcoin traded above $74,000 by Wednesday morning last week before reversing lower. The decline deepened around and after the year’s second FOMC meeting, adding pressure to the broader crypto market.
By press time, bitcoin had fallen below $70,000 after a brief rebound to $71,500. That move followed Trump’s latest “statement” on the war in Iran, which briefly pushed prices higher before the rally faded.
Strategy’s bitcoin stack remains under pressure as the asset trades below the company’s latest average purchase price. The market correction has left the firm sitting on unrealized losses based on current spot levels.
Bluesky reveals it quietly raised $100m Series B back in April 2025
Labour has 45 days to pull-off an electoral miracle in Wales
BGC class action continues in court
Smart energy pays enters the US market, targeting scalable financial infrastructure
Why Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering
Bitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
AO VIVO: FECHAMENTO DE MERCADO – 23/03/2026 | CNN MONEY
Bitcoin Outperforms Asset During War, Mastercard Buys BVNK | Bloomberg Crypto 3/17/2026
Financial statements of sole proprietorship | Balance sheet | Trading and P/L account | Class 11
-
Crypto World3 days agoNIO (NIO) Stock Plunges 6.5% as Shelf Registration Sparks Dilution Worries
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Adidas – Corporette.com
-
Politics3 days agoJenni Murray, Long-Serving Woman’s Hour Presenter, Dies Aged 75
-
Tech7 days agoAre Split Spacebars the Next Big Gaming Keyboard Trend?
-
Crypto World2 days agoBest Crypto to Buy Now: Strategy Just Spent $1.57 Billion on Bitcoin During Fear While Early Investors Quietly Enter Pepeto for 150x Potential
-
News Videos6 days agoRBA board divided on rate cut, unusually buoyant share market | Finance Report | ABC NEWS
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin Price News: Bhutan Sells $72 Million in BTC Under Fiscal Pressure, but the Smart Money Entering Pepeto Sees What the Market Does Not
-
Politics6 days agoThe House | The new register to protect children from their abusers shows Parliament at its best
-
Tech4 days agoinKONBINI Lets You Spend Summer Days Behind the Register
-
Politics7 days agoReal-time pollution monitoring calls after boy nearly dies
-
Crypto World6 days agoCanada’s FINTRAC revokes registrations of 23 crypto MSBs in AML crackdown
-
Sports18 hours agoRemo Stars and Kano Pillars Strengthen Survival Hopes in NPFL
-
NewsBeat5 days agoResidents in North Lanarkshire reminded to register to vote in Scottish Parliament Election
-
News Videos6 days agoPARLIAMENT OF MALAWI – PAC MEETING WITH REGISTRAR OF FINANCIAL ON AMARYLLIS HOTEL – INQUIRY LIVE
-
Politics4 days agoGender equality discussions at UN face pushbacks and US resistance
-
Business2 days agoNo Winner in March 21 Drawing as Prize Rolls to $133 Million for Next
-
Business5 days agoWho Was Alex Pretti? 5 Key Facts About the ICU Nurse Killed by Federal Agents in Minneapolis
-
Sports17 hours agoGary Kirsten Accuses Pakistan Cricket Board Of ‘Interference’, Mohsin Naqvi Responds
-
Tech1 day agoGive Your Phone a Huge (and Free) Upgrade by Switching to Another Keyboard
-
Sports3 days ago2026 Kentucky Derby horses, odds, futures, preview, date: Expert who nailed 12 Derby-Oaks Doubles enters picks
You must be logged in to post a comment Login