Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

How Trump’s Iran Pause Fits Into His Market-Timed Playbook

Published

on


On Monday, March 23, President Trump announced a 5-Day pause on strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure. The decision added $1.7 trillion to US stocks, crashed oil prices by 15%, and sent Bitcoin above $70,000. That pause is now extended until April 6. 

But Tehran called these claims ‘fake news’, and Israel already violated Trump’s pause. Almost all of these financial gains vanished within a week.

So, did Donald Trump actually have productive talks with Iran, or was it just a ploy to benefit financial markets and have big players cash out?

How Trump’s Pause Lines Up With Market Hours

The sequence starts Saturday, March 22. Trump posted a 48-hour ultimatum on Truth Social demanding Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on its power plants.

Advertisement

That deadline was set to expire Monday evening, with traditional markets fully open and exposed.

Instead of following through, Trump posted at 7 a.m. ET Monday, claiming “very good and productive conversations” with Tehran. He announced a 5-day postponement of all energy infrastructure strikes.

The 5-day window expired Saturday, March 28. Not a random day.

Advertisement
  • Equity markets are closed
  • Futures liquidity is thin
  • Institutional desks are offline.

If escalation resumes, it lands in the same low-liquidity window that has preceded every major Trump-era market shock since mid-2025.

Timeline graphic showing Saturday ultimatum, Monday pause, Saturday expiry aligned against NYSE/CME trading hours
Timeline graphic showing the Saturday ultimatum, Monday pause, and Saturday expiry, aligned with NYSE/CME trading hours. Source: BeInCrypto

Someone Traded Before the Post

Markets moved before the announcement went live. Between 6:49 and 6:50 a.m. ET, roughly 6,200 Brent and WTI futures contracts changed hands with a notional value of $580 million.

The average for that same minute over the prior five trading days was approximately 700 contracts, according to Bloomberg data reported by the Financial Times.

At the same time, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 futures were purchased. That single order pushed the index 0.3% higher instantly. Fourteen minutes later, Trump’s post dropped. By 7:10 a.m. ET, the S&P 500 had gained roughly $2 trillion in value.

U.S. and UK regulators are reportedly reviewing the data. No charges have been filed.

Advertisement

“The massive spike in volume of trades right before that post is certainly enough to raise eyebrows, and I think to launch an investigation into what was behind that,” wrote CBS News, citing Stephen Piepgrass, a partner who specializes in futures trading at the law firm Troutman Pepper Locke.

Iran Says It Never Happened

Tehran’s response left no ambiguity. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf called it “fake news” intended to manipulate financial and oil markets.

The Foreign Ministry described it as psychological warfare aimed at lowering energy prices and buying time for more strikes. Officials acknowledged receiving messages through intermediaries but insisted no direct negotiations occurred.

The denial triggered an immediate reversal. Oil rebounded. Stocks gave back roughly half their gains. BTC pulled back after briefly reclaiming $70,000, leaving $265 million in crypto shorts liquidated within 15 minutes.

Advertisement
BTC, Gold, Oil, and SPX Performance since Monday
BTC, Gold, Oil, and SPX Performance since Monday. Source: TradingView

This Has Happened 11 Times Since November 2024

Monday was not the first time. BeInCrypto has tracked 11 market-moving Trump announcements since November 2024, each following what traders now call the TACO pattern, a cycle of action, crash, reversal, and recovery.

  • Liberation Day tariffs were announced on April 2, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. ET, after markets closed. Trump posted “BE COOL! THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!” the next morning, minutes after opening. A 90-day pause followed, producing a 9.5% rally in the S&P 500.
  • On October 10, 2025, a 100% tariff threat on China dropped on a Friday, 20 minutes after close. BTC fell 18.4%. Crypto liquidations hit $19.1 billion in 24 hours.
Table showing all 11 Trump market events with dates, BTC before/after, percentage moves, liquidations, and TACO outcomes
Table showing all 11 Trump market events with dates, BTC before/after, percentage moves, liquidations, and TACO outcomes. Source: BeInCrypto

Six confirmed Friday night strikes between June 2025 and February 2026 followed the same logic. BeInCrypto identified this as a repeatable 60-hour sequence across those events.

The Iran pause is the evolution. Instead of a Friday shock and a Monday walk-back, Monday itself became the vehicle. Ultimatum on Saturday. Relief on Monday. Next escalation window on Saturday again.

What the Experts See

Oxford-based political scientist Richard Heydarian warned on the BeInCrypto podcast that the economic damage from the conflict could run into trillions while Trump’s tactical moves remain impossible to anticipate.

“Trump is strategically predictable, but tactically impossible to predict. We know what his endgame is. American hegemony, beyond question. But how to achieve that in such a complex world? No one knows,” Richard Heydarian told BeInCrypto.

Stanford economist Mordecai Kurz, also speaking on the BeInCrypto podcast, placed the dynamics within a structural problem of concentrated private power that leaves ordinary people exposed.

“There are so many concentrations of private power in America that this cannot continue… young people have a chance only if technology is made to serve people and policy serves people,” Kurz explained.

The 5-day clock expires Saturday. If the pattern holds, the next headline lands when markets are closed, and liquidity is at its weakest.

Advertisement

Across 11 documented events and 16 months, the pattern has not broken once.

The post How Trump’s Iran Pause Fits Into His Market-Timed Playbook appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Linea Ends Direct EVM Arithmetization, Moves to RISC-V to Match Ethereum’s Proving Roadmap

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Linea’s shift to RISC-V reduces instruction complexity from EVM’s full opcode set to roughly 40 instructions.
  • Every Ethereum hard fork previously forced complete rewrites of Linea’s ZK constraint modules under the old system.
  • RISC-V enables Type-1 Ethereum compatibility automatically through standard compiler tooling, replacing manual constraint work.
  • Linea retains zkC, Vortex, and Arcane in the new stack, preserving years of cryptographic research and production experience.

Linea, the Ethereum Layer 2 network developed by ConsenSys, is transitioning from direct EVM arithmetization to a RISC-V-based proving architecture.

The team spent three years building one of the most rigorous ZK proving systems in production. That work produced a 1,000-page specification that became an ecosystem reference.

However, the approach created maintenance challenges that slowed progress. The move to RISC-V marks a strategic reset focused on performance, modularity, and Ethereum alignment.

A Simpler Instruction Set Changes Everything

The EVM operates with a complex, dynamic state model that is difficult to translate into mathematical constraints. RISC-V, by contrast, offers approximately 40 instructions and 32 registers.

That simplicity makes traces narrower and allows the prover to start working on proof chunks immediately. The performance gains are structural, not incremental.

Advertisement

Every Ethereum hard fork previously required complete rewrites of Linea’s constraint modules. That maintenance burden consumed significant research capacity.

The team was managing complexity instead of advancing cryptographic performance. Switching to RISC-V removes that cycle entirely.

Type-1 Ethereum compatibility was another major obstacle under the old architecture. Achieving it required implementing Keccak, RLP, and the Merkle Patricia Trie manually inside constraints.

With RISC-V, a standard EVM client compiles directly to a RISC-V binary, and the compiler handles compatibility automatically.

Advertisement

Linea’s cryptographic researcher Alexandre Belling presented the transition at the eth_proofs conference. As Linea posted on X, the team is moving toward “true modularity,” where every layer can be independently benchmarked, audited, or replaced. That was not achievable with the tightly coupled system previously in use.

The Ethereum Foundation has also committed to RISC-V as part of its proving layer roadmap. Linea cited this as a deciding factor. Continuing on the previous path would have meant diverging from Ethereum’s long-term technical direction.

What Carries Forward Into the New Stack

Linea is not discarding years of work. The team’s constraint-native language, zkC, will be used to write the RISC-V virtual machine. Vortex and Arcane, which handle proving and aggregation, are architecture-independent and transfer directly.

Formal verification is being built into the new system from the start. Constraints are being designed for export to tools like Lean. That approach makes the stack auditable by a much wider audience than before.

Linea also retains full-stack ownership across its infrastructure. That includes the Besu execution client, the Maru consensus layer, the ZK prover, and the gateway. No critical third-party dependencies exist in the architecture.

Advertisement

As Linea noted in a follow-up post on X, direct EVM arithmetization was “difficult to audit without deep cryptographic expertise.”

RISC-V is widely taught, well documented, and supported by a growing developer ecosystem. The shift makes the proving stack accessible beyond Linea’s internal team.

The transition positions Linea as an early mover in a space where the broader Ethereum ecosystem is now converging.

Years of production proving experience now apply to a simpler, faster architecture. The team has indicated more technical details will follow in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Builders Propose ‘Economic Zone’ to Fix L2 Fragmentation

Published

on

Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum 2.0, Layer2, Arbitrum

Developers from Gnosis and Zisk, with backing from the Ethereum Foundation, have proposed a new framework aimed at unifying Ethereum’s fragmented layer-2 ecosystem by enabling rollups to interact seamlessly with each other and the mainnet in a single transaction.

According to an announcement shared with Cointelegraph, the proposed “Ethereum Economic Zone” (EEZ) would allow smart contracts on different rollups to execute synchronously across networks without relying on bridges.

The initiative targets a key trade-off in Ethereum’s scaling strategy, where dozens of layer-2 networks have improved throughput but split liquidity, infrastructure and user activity across separate environments.

If implemented, the framework would let applications share infrastructure across rollups while settling back to Ethereum, reducing duplication and the need for cross-chain transfers.

Advertisement

The project is being developed together with Ethereum researchers and industry participants, with early contributors including infrastructure providers and DeFi protocols exploring a shared standard for interoperable rollups.