Connect with us

Tech

Apple integrates Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s Codex into Xcode 26.3 in push for ‘agentic coding’

Published

on

Apple on Tuesday announced a major update to its flagship developer tool that gives artificial intelligence agents unprecedented control over the app-building process, a move that signals the iPhone maker’s aggressive push into an emerging and controversial practice known as “agentic coding.”

Xcode 26.3, available immediately as a release candidate, integrates Anthropic’s Claude Agent and OpenAI’s Codex directly into Apple’s development environment, allowing the AI systems to autonomously write code, build projects, run tests, and visually verify their own work — all with minimal human oversight.

The update is Apple’s most significant embrace of AI-assisted software development since introducing intelligence features in Xcode 26 last year, and arrives as “vibe coding” — the practice of delegating software creation to large language models — has become one of the most debated topics in technology.

Apple says that while integrating intelligence into the Xcode developer workflow is powerful, the model itself still has a somewhat limited aperture. It answers questions based on what the developer provides, but it doesn’t have access to the full context of the project, and it’s not able to take action on its own. That changes with this update, the company said during a press conference Tuesday morning.

Advertisement

How Apple’s new AI coding features let developers build apps faster than ever

The key innovation in Xcode 26.3 is the depth of integration between AI agents and Apple’s development tools. Unlike previous iterations that offered code suggestions and autocomplete features, the new system grants AI agents access to nearly every aspect of the development process.

During a live demonstration, an Apple engineer showed how the Claude agent could receive a simple prompt — “add a new feature to show the weather at a landmark” — and then independently analyze the project’s file structure, consult Apple’s documentation, write the necessary code, build the project, and take screenshots of the running application to verify its work matched the requested design.

According to Apple, the agent is able to use tools like build and screenshot previews to verify its work, visually analyze the image, and confirm that everything has been built accordingly. Before, when interacting with a model, it would provide an answer and just stop there.

The system creates automatic checkpoints as developers interact with the AI, allowing them to roll back changes if results prove unsatisfactory — a safeguard that acknowledges the unpredictable nature of AI-generated code.

Advertisement

Apple says it worked directly with Anthropic and OpenAI to optimize the experience with particular attention paid to reducing token usage — the computational units that determine costs when using cloud-based AI models — and improving the efficiency of tool calling.

According to the company, developers can download new agents with a single click, and they update automatically.

Why Apple’s adoption of the Model Context Protocol could reshape the AI development landscape

Underlying the integration is the Model Context Protocol, or MCP, an open standard that Anthropic developed for connecting AI agents with external tools. Apple’s adoption of MCP means that any compatible agent — not just Claude or Codex — can now interact with Xcode’s capabilities.

Apple says this also works for agents that are running outside of Xcode. Any agent that is compatible with MCP can now work with Xcode to do all the same things — project discovery and change management, building and testing apps, working with previews and code snippets, and accessing the latest documentation.

Advertisement

The decision to embrace an open protocol, rather than building a proprietary system, represents a notable departure for Apple, which has historically favored closed ecosystems. It also positions Xcode as a potential hub for a growing universe of AI development tools.

Xcode’s troubled history with AI tools — and why Apple says this time is different

The announcement comes against a backdrop of mixed experiences with AI-assisted coding in Apple’s tools. During the press conference, one developer described previous attempts to use AI agents with Xcode as “horrible,” citing constant crashes and an inability to complete basic tasks.

Apple acknowledged the concerns while arguing that the new integration addresses fundamental limitations of earlier approaches.

The company says the big shift is that Claude and Codex have so much more visibility into the breadth of the project. If they hallucinate and write code that doesn’t work, they can now build, see the compile errors, and iterate in real time to fix those issues — in some cases before presenting it as a finished work.

Advertisement

Apple argues that the power of IDE integration extends beyond error correction. Agents can now automatically add entitlements to projects when needed to access protected APIs — a task the company says would be otherwise very difficult for an AI operating outside the development environment dealing with binary files it may not have the format for.

From Andrej Karpathy’s tweet to LinkedIn certifications: The unstoppable rise of vibe coding

Apple’s announcement arrives at a crucial moment in the evolution of AI-assisted development. The term “vibe coding,” coined by AI researcher Andrej Karpathy in early 2025, has transformed from a curiosity into a genuine cultural phenomenon that is reshaping how software gets built.

LinkedIn announced last week that it will begin offering official certifications in AI coding skills, drawing on usage data from platforms like Lovable and Replit. Job postings requiring AI proficiency doubled in the past year, according to edX research, with Indeed’s Hiring Lab reporting that 4.2% of U.S. job listings now mention AI-related keywords.

The enthusiasm is driven by genuine productivity gains. Casey Newton, the technology journalist, recently described building a complete personal website using Claude Code in about an hour — a task that previously required expensive Squarespace subscriptions and years of frustrated attempts with various website builders.

Advertisement

More dramatically, Jaana Dogan, a principal engineer at Google, posted that she gave Claude Code “a description of the problem” and “it generated what we built last year in an hour.” Her post, which accumulated more than 8 million views, began with the disclaimer: “I’m not joking and this isn’t funny.”

Security experts warn that AI-generated code could lead to ‘catastrophic explosions’

But the rapid adoption of agentic coding has also sparked significant concerns among security researchers and software engineers.

David Mytton, founder and CEO of developer security provider Arcjet, warned last month that the proliferation of vibe-coded applications “into production will lead to catastrophic problems for organizations that don’t properly review AI-developed software.”

“In 2026, I expect more and more vibe-coded applications hitting production in a big way,” Mytton wrote. “That’s going to be great for velocity… but you’ve still got to pay attention. There’s going to be some big explosions coming!”

Advertisement

Simon Willison, co-creator of the Django web framework, drew an even starker comparison. “I think we’re due a Challenger disaster with respect to coding agent security,” he said, referring to the 1986 space shuttle explosion that killed all seven crew members. “So many people, myself included, are running these coding agents practically as root. We’re letting them do all of this stuff.”

A pre-print paper from researchers this week warned that vibe coding could pose existential risks to the open-source software ecosystem. The study found that AI-assisted development pulls user interaction away from community projects, reduces visits to documentation websites and forums, and makes launching new open-source initiatives significantly harder.

Stack Overflow usage has plummeted as developers increasingly turn to AI chatbots for answers—a shift that could ultimately starve the very knowledge bases that trained the AI models in the first place.

Previous research painted an even more troubling picture: a 2024 report found that vibe coding using tools like GitHub Copilot “offered no real benefits unless adding 41% more bugs is a measure of success.”

Advertisement

The hidden mental health cost of letting AI write your code

Even enthusiastic adopters have begun acknowledging the darker aspects of AI-assisted development.

Peter Steinberger, creator of the viral AI agent originally known as Clawdbot (now OpenClaw), recently revealed that he had to step back from vibe coding after it consumed his life.

“I was out with my friends and instead of joining the conversation in the restaurant, I was just like, vibe coding on my phone,” Steinberger said in a recent podcast interview. “I decided, OK, I have to stop this more for my mental health than for anything else.”

Steinberger warned that the constant building of increasingly powerful AI tools creates the “illusion of making you more productive” without necessarily advancing real goals. “If you don’t have a vision of what you’re going to build, it’s still going to be slop,” he added.

Advertisement

Google CEO Sundar Pichai has expressed similar reservations, saying he won’t vibe code on “large codebases where you really have to get it right.”

“The security has to be there,” Pichai said in a November podcast interview.

Boris Cherny, the Anthropic engineer who created Claude Code, acknowledged that vibe coding works best for “prototypes or throwaway code, not software that sits at the core of a business.”

“You want maintainable code sometimes. You want to be very thoughtful about every line sometimes,” Cherny said.

Advertisement

Apple is gambling that deep IDE integration can make AI coding safe for production

Apple appears to be betting that the benefits of deep IDE integration can mitigate many of these concerns. By giving AI agents access to build systems, test suites, and visual verification tools, the company is essentially arguing that Xcode can serve as a quality control mechanism for AI-generated code.

Susan Prescott, Apple’s vice president of Worldwide Developer Relations, framed the update as part of Apple’s broader mission.

In a statement, Apple said its goal is to make tools that put industry-leading technologies directly in developers’ hands so they can build the very best apps. The company says agentic coding supercharges productivity and creativity, streamlining the development workflow so developers can focus on innovation.

But the question remains whether the safeguards will prove sufficient as AI agents grow more autonomous. Asked about debugging capabilities, Apple noted that while Xcode has a powerful debugger built in, there is no direct MCP tool for debugging.

Advertisement

Developers can run the debugger and manually relay information to the agent, but the AI cannot yet independently investigate runtime issues — a limitation that could prove significant as the complexity of AI-generated code increases.

The update also does not currently support running multiple agents simultaneously on the same project, though Apple noted that developers can open projects in multiple Xcode windows using Git worktrees as a workaround.

The future of software development hangs in the balance — and Apple just raised the stakes

Xcode 26.3 is available immediately as a release candidate for members of the Apple Developer Program, with a general release expected soon on the App Store. The release candidate designation — Apple’s final beta before production — means developers who download today will automatically receive the finished version when it ships.

The integration supports both API keys and direct account credentials from OpenAI and Anthropic, offering developers flexibility in managing their AI subscriptions. But those conveniences belie the magnitude of what Apple is attempting: nothing less than a fundamental reimagining of how software comes into existence.

Advertisement

For the world’s most valuable company, the calculus is straightforward. Apple’s ability to attract and retain developers has always underpinned its platform dominance. If agentic coding delivers on its promise of radical productivity gains, early and deep integration could cement Apple’s position for another generation. If it doesn’t — if the security disasters and “catastrophic explosions” that critics predict come to pass — Cupertino could find itself at the epicenter of a very different kind of transformation.

The technology industry has spent decades building systems to catch human errors before they reach users. Now it must answer a more unsettling question: What happens when the errors aren’t human at all?

As Apple conceded during Tuesday’s press conference, with what may prove to be unintentional understatement: “Large language models, as agents sometimes do, sometimes hallucinate.”

Millions of lines of code are about to find out how often.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

5 Of The Most Frustrating Engine Layouts Ever Designed

Published

on





Cars used to be really simple. They would have an engine up-front, perfectly visible and surrounded by heaps of open space under the hood, a few seats in the middle, and a trunk at the back. As the years have progressed, though, the car has gotten immensely complicated, and while that brings many benefits, it also brings a smattering of negatives.

Bigger engines, more ancillaries, larger crumple zones, and heaps of plastic panels covering anything mechanical has meant that engine bays have become increasingly harder to work on. No longer can you just reach in with a socket and begin working away, which has meant working on your own car has become noticeably harder over the years.

Advertisement

I’ve always taken pride in tinkering away on my own cars — whether I’m doing them any good or not is another matter — but I learn along the way, and it’s quite enjoyable too, usually. That being said, when it comes to newer cars, I simply don’t bother any more. Having worked on some pretty complex cars and bitten off way more than I can chew a few too many times, I’ve learnt to leave it up to the experts on modern machines.

Not all cars are bad though, some are renowned for being horrendous to work on, and the mere mention of one such model will likely have your mechanic groaning before the job has even started. So, if you’re looking for something easy to work on, avoid these five cars, as their engine layouts make some of the most basic tasks an absolute nightmare to carry out.

Advertisement

First-generation Audi R8

Audi’s baby supercar bridged the gap between sports and supercars, and finally gave deep-pocketed car enthusiasts a real daily driver alternative to the Porsche 911. Sure, they could also shop at Chevy dealerships for a Corvette, but the fit and finish of contemporary ‘Vettes just wasn’t in the same league as either of these German bruisers.

When it came time to crack on with maintenance, though, R8 owners might have wished they’d walked into a Porsche or Chevy dealer though, as the four-ringed model is notoriously tricky to work on. Being mid-engine, the Audi’s 4.2-liter V8 sits directly behind the cabin, and access is far from ideal back there.

In order for everything to be both neatly packaged and still be presentable under the glass engine cover, certain ancillaries had to be buried beneath the naturally aspirated mill. For example, the air conditioning compressor. Unfortunately, the engine temperatures down there are a little much for the compressor to handle, and so it’s a frequent failure point for the R8. Replacement of the faulty part requires the engine to be removed, which itself means the back end of Audi’s flagship supercar to be pulled apart. Enthusiasts also point out that simple jobs, such as bleeding the brakes, are far more complex than you’d first imagine, which means — while the R8 is certainly more approachable than other more exotic supercars — maintenance is still a considerable barrier to enjoyment.

Advertisement

There is some good news, though — V10-powered models don’t require the engine to be removed for this job, so perhaps for once the sensible choice is to splash out and buy the Lamborghini-engine supercar instead?

Advertisement

The B8-generation Audi S4 is a nightmare for access

This one is a particular sore talking point for me, as our family car is a facelifted S4, and while it’s an absolute joy to drive, getting anything done is a real pain. For starters, the supercharged V6 can actually be quite durable — there are many out there with north of 200,000 miles, and many of these are tuned cars with north of 450 horsepower too, but the maintenance required to keep them on the road in fine fettle can be a little intense.

See, Audi decided to locate many of the S4’s weaknesses underneath the supercharger, nestled within the ‘vee’ of the engine. Here, you’ll find the PCV, waterpump, thermostat, and supercharger intercooler cores — all of which fail frequently and leak coolant. Not that you’ll see it, as the coolant just evaporates in the heat of the vee.

To replace them then, it’s supercharger off, which in itself can be a pretty daunting and tricky job, as beneath the supercharger are a smattering of brittle plastic hoses, which love to crack as you remove them for access. That’s not the worst of it, though; the S4’s V6 is driven by a timing chain, or more specifically, four timing chains. They’re all located at the bulkhead end, too, which means it’s engine out time should you need to get the job done (which you will at some point). Expect to pay north of $5,000 at a reputable independent garage.

Equally tricky to access are the catalytic converters. There are two, and they sit right behind the engine – nigh-on impossible to access without removal of the engine. These are another common weakness too, meaning S4 ownership requires an awful lot of engine-out time. Certainly, it does in my case.

Advertisement

You’ll have to remove the Ferrari 355’s engine entirely if you want to renew the cambelt

You might expect that something as exotic as an older Ferrari will be a bit tricky to work on, and you’d be absolutely correct in thinking so. The Ferrari 355 isn’t the only model that requires the engine to be removed for a cambelt change, but it is the last, so it’s worth singling out.

Advertisement

Naturally, sporting a Prancing Horse on the front means such a job won’t be cheap. Some enthusiasts claim the job can be carried out for around $2,000 — provided the mechanics don’t come across anything else wrong while they’re in there — whereas other sources suggest the bill could easily run north of $7,000. Enthusiasts on owner’s forums find disbelief in the idea that the cambelt change can be done for the lower figure, suggesting the parts alone cost in the region of $1,500, and that it’s a 40-hour job to do correctly. Cracked exhaust manifolds can be another source of headache too, themselves carrying eye-watering average costs in the region of $4,000 to replace.

Cambelts only last three years or 30,000 miles, too, so it’s not like this is a fit-and-forget type of job. As soon as it’s done, it’s time to get saving up again for the next go round, which can really put a dampener on the whole ownership experience.

Advertisement

W8-powered Volkswagen Passats are a nightmare for mechanics

The Volkswagen Passat is a fairly dull and easy to forget car, which is exactly what it was designed to be. It’s just a cookie-cutter sedan for those who wanted a well-screwed-together European sedan that would fly under the radar. Most are easy enough to work on, thanks to sharing their mechanical components with tons of other Volkswagen-Audi-Group models, but there is one particular rarity from the Passat universe that is an absolute nightmare to turn the wrenches on: the W8.

Essentially half a Veyron engine, the W8 was a 4.0-liter, eight-cylinder, naturally aspirated lump that, for some reason, the bean-counters and boffins at Volkswagen in the early 2000s decided was a great idea for production. It was only available for a few short years, and while it’s a treasured chapter of Volkswagen history for many, it’s notoriously difficult to work on.

It’s not rocket science to understand why, either. The Passat has been predominately four-cylinder-powered since it arrived on the scene over 50 years ago. So, cramming an eight-cylinder lump under that same hood is going to be a tight squeeze.

Advertisement

Enthusiasts may love them, but technicians not so much — they see them as a real pain instead. It’s been noted on owner’s forums that even some basic maintenance jobs, such as the changing of an O2 sensor, require the engine to be dropped out. Other jobs that require the same ordeal include head gasket change, camshaft replacement, and work on timing chain. Oh, and much of the front end needs removing to get the engine out, which also comes with the transmission — joy. This Volkswagen is definitely not for the faint of heart, or light of wallet, for that matter.

Advertisement

AMC’s Pacer squeezed huge engines into its tiny engine compartment

The ugly duckling of America’s automotive industry, the AMC Pacer has found fans thanks to its obscurity and bizarre looks, but those awkward lines have been distracting us from other more inherent issues over the years. See, initially the AMC Pacer was designed to be powered by a compact rotary engine, and by design, such engines are small in size.

The idea makes sense; a little rotary could be neatly packaged within the AMC’s compact proportions, but that’s not exactly how things panned out. Instead, a choice of six- and eight-cylinder engines were offered, and as you might imagine, cramming these larger lumps into a space designed to house a compact rotary lump meant there was little space left over for turning wrenches.

Numerous sources detail that the Pacer was always tricky to work on, and that might be a contributing factor as to why so few remain on our roads today, although we’ll wager the divisive styling was always the true problem. The Pacer might not be as troublesome to work on as some of the other cars featured within this article, but remember, the AMC hails from an era when access was plentiful, sensors were seldom seen, and plastic covers were for lunchboxes, not V8s. So, to find an American-made commuter which went against the grain was quite unusual for the time, and likely made it less than favorable with the local techies.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

HHS Is Making an AI Tool to Create Hypotheses About Vaccine Injury Claims

Published

on

The US Department of Health and Human Services is developing a generative artificial intelligence tool to find patterns across data reported to a national vaccine monitoring database and to generate hypotheses on the negative effects of vaccines, according to an inventory released last week of all use cases the agency had for AI in 2025.

The tool has not yet been deployed, according to the HHS document, and an AI inventory report from the previous year shows that it has been in development since late 2023. But experts worry that the predictions it generates could be used by Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to further his anti-vaccine agenda.

A long-standing vaccine critic, Kenedy has upended the childhood vaccination schedule in his year in office, removing several shots from a list of recommended immunizations for all children, including those for Covid-19, influenza, hepatitis A and B, meningococcal disease, rotavirus, and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV.

Kennedy has also called for overhauling the current safety monitoring system for vaccine injury data collection, known as Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, claiming that it suppresses information about the true rate of vaccine side effects. He has also proposed changes to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that could make it easier for people to sue for adverse events that haven’t been proven to be associated with vaccines.

Advertisement

Jointly managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, VAERS was established in 1990 as a way to detect potential safety issues with vaccines after their approval. Anyone, including health care providers and members of the public, can submit an adverse reaction report to the database. Because these claims are not verified, VAERS data alone can’t be used to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event.

“VAERS, at best, was always a hypothesis-generating mechanism,” says Paul Offit, a pediatrician and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia who was previously a member of the CDC’s Advisory Council on Immunization Practices. “It’s a noisy system. Anybody can report, and there’s no control group.”

Offit says the system only shows adverse events that happened at some point following immunization; it doesn’t prove that a vaccine caused those reactions. CDC’s own website says that a report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event. Despite this, anti-vaccine activists have misused VAERS data over the years to argue that vaccines are not safe.

Leslie Lenert, previously the founding director of the CDC’s National Center for Public Health Informatics, says government scientists have been using traditional natural language processing AI models to look for patterns in VAERS data for several years, so it’s not surprising that HHS would move toward the adoption of more advanced large language models.

Advertisement

One major limitation of VAERS is that it doesn’t include data on how many people received a vaccine, which can make events logged in the database seem more common than they actually are. For that reason, Lenert says it’s important to pair information from VAERS with other data sources to determine the true risk of an event.

LLMs are also famously good at producing convincing hallucinations, underscoring the need for humans to follow up on any hypotheses generated by an LLM.

“VAERS is supposed to be very exploratory. Some people in the FDA are now treating it as more than exploratory,” says Lenert, who is currently the director of the Center for Biomedical Informatics and Health Artificial Intelligence at Rutgers University.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

5 New Electronics You Can Buy At Costco In 2026

Published

on





What’s the last thing you bought at Costco? A case of tomato sauce? Enough toilet paper to last the year? A $1.50 hot dog? Perhaps it was a computer or electronic device — after all, the wholesale big-box chain offers plenty of gadgets alongside its more well-known wares. It can be easy to overlook such items when surrounded by towering shelves of bulk food and discount clothing, but many customers have already saved time by doing their tech shopping at the same time they’re buying everything else, rather than visiting a specialty electronics store.

Taking into account the fact that you can also buy many electronics online from Costco’s website, it’s not at all surprising that many people get their gadgets from the retailer. Costco’s offerings include gaming accessories, health and fitness gear, smart home appliances, and more. Plus, it’s always adding more products to its catalog — several new tech items are available in-store, online, or from both.

Advertisement

According to reviews, there are several Costco tech items you should avoid, so you’ll want to do a little research and brand comparisons before buying anything expensive from the store. Newer products tend to have fewer customer reviews than those that have had time to accumulate them, which makes it tougher to tell whether they’re worth paying money for or just additional 21st-century lemons for the next garage sale. The one thing we can say objectively about the following devices is that they’re some of the newest electronics you can buy at Costco in 2026.

Advertisement

1. PowerA Meta Head Strap and Charging Station

One of the new electronics you can buy from Costco this year comes bundled with a non-electronic, though both are accessories for one of the most popular gaming devices on the market. The retailer is selling a head strap for the Meta Quest as part of a twofer with a convenient charging station for the headset and batteries. Those who use their virtual reality headset often may wear out their head strap and need a replacement — the one that comes with the PowerA Meta Head Strap and Charging Station bundle is officially licensed by Meta, as is the charger.

The PowerA Meta Charging Station is a base that Costco says can also be used to display the Quest for those who like to show off their hi-tech toys as part of their home decor. It’s equipped with rubber feet and a weighted base to keep it securely on the surface and prevent your Quest from falling to the floor. The Quest can charge at the station once placed, without requiring any cables. The station includes two rechargeable controller batteries, each providing 30 hours of charge. A 6-foot USB-C charging cable is also included.

The station has a built-in LED charge indicator for the headset, while each controller also displays charging status. Plus, an additional USB-C port is included that allows the station to also charge additional devices. Both the PowerA Meta Head Strap and Charging Station are compatible with the Meta Quest 3 and the Meta Quest 3S, which we called “a worthier heir to the mobile VR throne.” Both are also backed by a 2-year limited warranty.

Advertisement

2. Craftsman myQ Smart Belt-Drive Garage Door Opener

Craftsman is a nearly century-old brand best known for tools, but it also makes other hardware-related products — some of which you won’t find from other tool brands. There are several Craftsman tools not made by DeWalt. For example, Craftsman makes a smart garage door opener that you won’t find on DeWalt. Costco recently added the Craftsman myQ Smart Belt-Drive Garage Door Opener to its shelves, though it is currently available online only and limited to certain regions.

The Craftsman myQ Smart Garage Door Opener has a lift capacity equivalent to around 1 horsepower, and its belt is made of noise-dampening materials. It has built-in Wi-Fi and can be controlled via the myQ smartphone app, allowing you to open and close the garage door at any time, even when you’re not at home. The app can also provide real-time alerts. One useful feature is its battery backup, which allows you to operate the garage door even when your home loses power.

Advertisement

In addition to the smartphone app, the opener can be controlled with a 3-button remote that can be paired with up to three separate garage doors. The remote has a range of up to 1,500 feet, so while it’s not as extensive as smartphone control, it can still be used from a fair distance. The Craftsman myQ Smart Belt-Drive Garage Door Opener also features a dual light lens, separate light and opener controls, a locking vacation mode, safety-reversing sensors, enhanced security measures, and a lifetime warranty on the motor and drive.

Advertisement

3. Taylor Smart Body Composition Scale

Like just about everything else, modern body scales are a lot more advanced than those from a few decades ago. Digital scales have been around for a long time, but smart scales are newer to the market and allow users to track their weight over time via a paired app. Some of the best smart scales now provide metrics beyond body weight, giving people a more comprehensive view of their physiology, which can be useful whether you’re dieting, bulking, or for other health and fitness goals.

Costco recently began selling the Taylor Smart Body Composition Scale (model 5793F), one of several scale products available from the brand. In addition to weight, the device can estimate body fat, muscle mass, body water percentages, and BMI. Users can create a personalized profile that will save to the scale’s memory and take weight, age, height, gender, and activity levels into account. An athlete mode accommodates those with elite-level workout routines, as well. Up to 10 different people can create profiles, so the scale can be used even for very large families. It will automatically identify which user is currently using it.

The Taylor Smart Body Composition Scale works with the brand’s Precision Hub App. Every time you step on it, you’ll see your gains or losses since you last used it. The scale is built from tempered black and transparent glass and includes stainless steel measuring electrodes. A large, bright LCD display is also integrated, so you don’t always need to open the app. The scale has a capacity of up to 400 pounds and delivers weight in 0.2-lb increments. It includes the three AAA batteries required to power the device.

Advertisement

4. Philips ⅚-inch 5CCT Retrofit Downlights

While Philips Hue also makes security cameras and other electronics, lighting remains the brand’s core product. In addition to its Hue smart lights, the company offers other illumination devices that are more advanced than conventional light bulbs. One of Costco’s newest products is the Philips ⅚-inch 5CCT Retrofit Downlight, a flat, round fixture that mounts flush to the ceiling, offering a more elegant look than a naked bulb.

The key selling point of the Philips ⅚-inch 5CCT Retrofit Downlight is its adjustable color temperature, allowing users to customize their lighting setup. Cooler lights may make more sense in the kitchen, while warmer lights can provide a more relaxing vibe in the bedroom, for example. The downlight offers five color-temperature settings from 2,700K to 5,000K and 90% color accuracy. Maxing out at 850 lumens, it also features dimming from 100% down to 5% and is compatible with most standard dimmers. Built to replace 75W bulbs, it can be installed tool-free. Costco is selling the Downlight in an 8-pack, so you can upgrade the lighting throughout your home.

Advertisement

5. Yale Assure Lock 2

Smart security cameras have become popular household items recently, but another way to use IoT to keep your home secure is a smart lock. Smart locks come in various types, each with different features. The Yale Assure Lock 2, which Costco is now selling, is a fairly straightforward option. Unlike tech companies, Yale has been making locks since 1840. With nearly two centuries of experience, it’s no surprise that the company tops our list of the best smart lock brands.

Advertisement

The Yale Assure Lock 2 features a keypad but can also be controlled via voice commands via Apple HomeKit and unlocked with an iPhone or Apple Watch. Just as many commuters now tap their wrist to open a public transit turnstile, you could do the same with your front door using Yale’s device. The Assure Lock 2 also has an auto-lock feature, so you don’t need to remember whether you locked it before heading out.

Unique keypad codes can be created in Yale’s companion app, which can also be used to manage other settings and controls. It’s designed to be glare- and fingerprint-resistant, even under continuous use, and comes in three styles: Black, Satin Nickel, and Oil-Rubbed Bronze. The manufacturer says you won’t need a locksmith to install the device, as you can replace a standard deadbolt with it using only a screwdriver.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Super Mario 64 Conquers the Dreamcast After All These Years

Published

on

Super Mario 64 Dreamcast Port
SEGA’s Dreamcast may have met an early demise, but the console’s legacy lives on among fans. Now, a small crew has ported Super Mario 64 to the console. That’s right, programmer jnmartin84 finished what mrneo240 started in 2020, resulting in a game based on the original and burned onto a CD-R for crisper visuals as well as richer sound.



This was accomplished using a process known as decompilation, in which a team of volunteers spent years going over the original Nintendo 64 code line by line. This clean source code enables the existence of ports like this one. jnmartin84 improved the Dreamcast version by fixing the weird audio glitch, graphics issues, and adding the option to save to the VMU.

Sale


My Arcade Sonic Joystick Player: Sonic The Hedgehog Retro Game Console, 2 Games in 1, Sega Classic…
  • 🕹️ Officially Licensed: This is an officially licensed SEGA Game Console, ensuring an authentic gaming experience. High resolution 3.5” full…
  • 🎯 Games Included: Includes Sonic the Hedgehog and Sonic the Hedgehog 2. Capable of traveling at the speed of sound, Sonic is known for his speed,…
  • 🕹️ Iconic Characters: A true hero, he calls upon his skills to save the world from Dr. Eggman. Sonic has a big heart and is always ready to help…

To begin, get the source from GitHub and extract the textures and models from their own US version of Super Mario 64, as no resources are included in the source code to ensure that everything is totally legal. Next, a Dreamcast toolchain compiles everything into a binary that can be burned to a disk and loaded into the Dreamcast console, and voilà! Mario appears in his full 480p magnificence. Of course, emulators are supported as well, but let’s be honest: playing on real hardware is a whole different experience.

Advertisement


The transition from the N64’s muddy 240p to a gorgeous and sharp 480p is an improvement in itself. Not only that, but the textures, while identical to the original, appear slightly crisper due to the increased output. Not only does Mario’s world feel larger than ever before, but the framerate remains at a steady 30fps, just as it did in 1996.

Super Mario 64 Dreamcast Port
One of the hardest tasks was sound, as the N64 has a dedicated chip for mixing sound, while the Dreamcast lacks one and has to use the SH4 CPU for everything. Early tests were putting a lot of stress on the CPU, so John Brooks, a veteran coder, came in and helped out with some vector math and floating-point code to get everything running smoothly.

Super Mario 64 Dreamcast Port
The controls on this version snap neatly into place, as the Dreamcast’s stick steers Mario around with precision, while the button for jumps, the B button for braking, and the D-pad for switching cameras all function as expected. Because the VMU can save your game in the middle of a run, you can continue where you left off without having to restart from the beginning, no uncomfortable remapping required.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Rackspace customers grapple with “devastating” email hosting price hike

Published

on

Rackspace’s new pricing for its email hosting services is “devastating,” according to a partner that has been using Rackspace as its email provider since 1999.

In recent weeks, Rackspace updated its email hosting pricing. Its standard plan is now $10 per mailbox per month. Businesses can also pay for the Rackspace Email Plus add-on for an extra $2/mailbox/month (for “file storage, mobile sync, Office-compatible apps, and messaging”), and the Archiving add-on for an extra $6/mailbox/month (for unlimited storage).

As recently as November 2025, Rackspace charged $3/mailbox/month for its Standard plan, and an extra $1/mailbox/month for the Email Plus add-on, and an additional $3/mailbox/month for the Archival add-on, according to the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine.

Rackspace’s reseller partners have been especially vocal about the impacts of the new pricing.

Advertisement

In a blog post on Thursday, web hosting service provider and Rackspace reseller Laughing Squid said Rackspace is “increasing our email pricing by an astronomical 706 percent, with only a month-and-a half’s notice.”

Laughing Squid founder Scott Beale told Ars Technica that he received the “devastating” news via email on Wednesday. The last time Rackspace increased Laughing Squid’s email prices was by 55 percent in 2019, he said.

“The price increase has a major impact on the ability to make money due to the fact that email is now our largest expense, and we were only given a month-and-a-half notice,” Beale told Ars.

Online, there are reports of Rackspace partners being quoted email pricing increases of 110 percent to nearly 500 percent. The reports say that the new, higher-per-mailbox quotes don’t include volume pricing discounts. Beale noted that Laughing Squid’s quote doesn’t include discounts that the company previously received.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

10 things I learned from burning myself out with AI coding agents

Published

on

If you’ve ever used a 3D printer, you may recall the wondrous feeling when you first printed something you could have never sculpted or built yourself. Download a model file, load some plastic filament, push a button, and almost like magic, a three-dimensional object appears. But the result isn’t polished and ready for mass production, and creating a novel shape requires more skills than just pushing a button. Interestingly, today’s AI coding agents feel much the same way.

Since November, I have used Claude Code and Claude Opus 4.5 through a personal Claude Max account to extensively experiment with AI-assisted software development (I have also used OpenAI’s Codex in a similar way, though not as frequently). Fifty projects later, I’ll be frank: I have not had this much fun with a computer since I learned BASIC on my Apple II Plus when I was 9 years old. This opinion comes not as an endorsement but as personal experience: I voluntarily undertook this project, and I paid out of pocket for both OpenAI and Anthropic’s premium AI plans.

Throughout my life, I have dabbled in programming as a utilitarian coder, writing small tools or scripts when needed. In my web development career, I wrote some small tools from scratch, but I primarily modified other people’s code for my needs. Since 1990, I’ve programmed in BASIC, C, Visual Basic, PHP, ASP, Perl, Python, Ruby, MUSHcode, and some others. I am not an expert in any of these languages—I learned just enough to get the job done. I have developed my own hobby games over the years using BASIC, Torque Game Engine, and Godot, so I have some idea of what makes a good architecture for a modular program that can be expanded over time.


In December, I used Claude Code to create a multiplayer online clone of Katamari Damacy called
In December, I used Claude Code to create a multiplayer online clone of Katamari Damacy called “Christmas Roll-Up.”
Advertisement
In December, I used Claude Code to create a multiplayer online clone of Katamari Damacy called “Christmas Roll-Up.”
Advertisement


Credit:

Benj Edwards


Advertisement

Claude Code, Codex, and Google’s Gemini CLI, can seemingly perform software miracles on a small scale. They can spit out flashy prototypes of simple applications, user interfaces, and even games, but only as long as they borrow patterns from their training data. Much like a 3D printer, doing production-level work takes far more effort. Creating durable production code, managing a complex project, or crafting something truly novel still requires experience, patience, and skill beyond what today’s AI agents can provide on their own.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Say Hello To GoogleSQL – Slashdot

Published

on

BrianFagioli writes: Google has quietly retired the ZetaSQL name and rebranded its open source SQL analysis and parsing project as GoogleSQL. This is not a technical change but a naming cleanup meant to align the open source code with the SQL dialect already used across Google products like BigQuery and Spanner. Internally, Google has long called the dialect GoogleSQL, even while the open source project lived under a different name.

By unifying everything under GoogleSQL, Google says it wants to reduce confusion and make it clearer that the same SQL foundation is shared across its cloud services and open source tooling. The code, features, and team remain unchanged. Only the name is different. GoogleSQL is now the single label Google wants developers to recognize and use going forward.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

10 Ways To Turn Old Electronic Projects Into Green Solutions

Published

on

The world generates tons of electronic waste every year, leaving a profound impact on the environment. For tech enthusiasts, unused or broken electronics might be piling up in your garage or storage, but there’s hope. 

Transforming old electronic projects into green solutions is good for the planet and offers an opportunity for you to get creative and make the most out of the technology you love. Here are some clever ways to reduce your e-waste and put those old devices to use. 

1. Donate Working Electronics 

If you have working electronics that you no longer need or use, donating them makes a world of difference to the right organization. Schools, low-income households, and community centers often lack functioning devices, such as laptops, tablets, or cameras, to support education and digital literacy. Research local nonprofits or charities in your area that directly benefit people with your items. 

However, before donating, wipe any personal data from the devices and test them to confirm they function properly. Your donation extends the life of electronics and provides others with opportunities they might not otherwise have. 

Advertisement

2. Repurpose Components 

Have you considered disassembling old electronics and using their components for new DIY projects? Motors, capacitors, resistors, and LED lights from old devices are useful components for other creative or functional builds. For instance, taking apart an outdated remote-control toy car provides working motors for a robotics project. 

If you’re hesitant about where to start your deconstruction project, look for online tutorials or communities that specialize in DIY electronics and tinkering. This approach fosters innovation while preventing usable materials from going to waste. 

3. Recycle Responsibly 

Recycling outdated or broken electronics responsibly is essential for reducing the environmental impact. Look for certified e-waste recycling centers in your area, as they have the expertise to safely extract valuable materials, such as metals, plastics, and glass. 

These professionals also understand more niche topics like the packaging requirements for battery disposal and its importance. Many of these centers ensure proper disposal of harmful components, such as lithium-ion batteries or toxic chemicals. 

Advertisement

Some tech companies, like Apple or Best Buy, run recycling programs that collect used electronics at no charge to make the process easier. Always check that the battery compartment is empty before recycling and look for separate battery drop-off locations nearby. 

4. Sell Usable Parts 

Old tech often holds more value than you think, especially when you break it down into parts. Sell components like graphics cards, memory sticks, and processors individually via online marketplaces to other people who are working on repairs or upgrades. 

Selling these usable pieces allows other tech enthusiasts to extend the lifespan of their devices with affordable options. Before listing anything for sale, test component functionality and provide detailed descriptions for potential buyers. 

5. Upcycle Into Art 

Turn outdated circuit boards, wires, and other electronic components into unique art pieces that add character to your home or office. Circuit boards, with their intricate designs, look great as the foundation for creative sculptures. You might also fashion jewelry, such as earrings or pendants, from compact mechanical parts. 

Advertisement

Upcycling is an excellent way to showcase your love for technology while turning old electronics into greener solutions. Online platforms like Pinterest or Etsy have a wealth of inspiration for creating tech-inspired art.

6. Refurbish and Reuse 

Refurbishing old devices gives them a second life and keeps them out of landfills. Whether it’s a forgotten smartphone or a dusty tablet, replacing damaged screens, upgrading components, or repairing ports makes them useful again. Many online repair guides and tools are available to help you get started. You can also consult local repair services if you’re not confident handling electronics yourself. 

7. Compost Bio-Plastics 

Certain biodegradable electronics are now available on the market,  and if you’ve been a part of such innovative projects, consider composting them correctly. Bio-plastics offer an environmentally-friendly alternative to traditional, toxic materials used in items like device casings. 

After removing and recycling the electronic components, check the manufacturer’s guidance on how to safely compost the biodegradable parts. Composting allows these materials to break down naturally, which reduces their impact on the environment and enriches the soil. 

Advertisement

8. Convert to Smart Devices 

When you’re not ready to let go of your older tech, repurpose and upgrade it to serve modern smart functions. For example, an old Android phone can become a home security camera using apps specialized for that purpose. Similarly, you could repurpose a tablet as a digital cookbook or an extra monitor for your workstation. 

Many tutorials are available online to guide you through these transformations, which require minimal hassle and tools. This approach creates value without needing to purchase an entirely new device. 

9. Create Educational Displays 

Old electronic devices teach others about technology, especially young learners who are curious about how things work. Carefully dismantling items like computers or gaming consoles provides the components to create displays showcasing their inner workings. 

Label each part to explain its role in the device to provide a hands-on learning experience. Through education, older electronics continue to serve a vital purpose. Set up these displays in classrooms, community libraries, or science fairs to spark curiosity and inspire creativity in future tech enthusiasts. 

Advertisement

10. Transform Into Furniture 

For larger pieces of electronics, such as CRT TVs or bulky desktop computers, consider turning them into one-of-a-kind furniture. Hollow out an old TV and convert it into a fish tank or shelf. Similarly, a CPU tower might make a great base for a table or storage unit. 

These projects require minimal additional materials but do call for a touch of creativity and craftsmanship. By upcycling into tech furniture, you keep larger items from becoming waste while adding quirky, functional pieces to your space. 

Technology evolves quickly, and it’s easy for electronic projects to fall by the wayside. By thinking creatively and sustainably, old devices find new life, reduce waste, and even educate or inspire other learners and enthusiasts. Begin giving a second life to your retired projects today and make a meaningful difference. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Wikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.

Published

on

To work around those rules, the Humanizer skill tells Claude to replace inflated language with plain facts and offers this example transformation:

Before: “The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was officially established in 1989, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of regional statistics in Spain.”

After: “The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was established in 1989 to collect and publish regional statistics.”

Claude will read that and do its best as a pattern-matching machine to create an output that matches the context of the conversation or task at hand.

Advertisement

An example of why AI writing detection fails

Even with such a confident set of rules crafted by Wikipedia editors, we’ve previously written about why AI writing detectors don’t work reliably: There is nothing inherently unique about human writing that reliably differentiates it from LLM writing.

One reason is that even though most AI language models tend toward certain types of language, they can also be prompted to avoid them, as with the Humanizer skill. (Although sometimes it’s very difficult, as OpenAI found in its yearslong struggle against the em dash.)

Also, humans can write in chatbot-like ways. For example, this article likely contains some “AI-written traits” that trigger AI detectors even though it was written by a professional writer—especially if we use even a single em dash—because most LLMs picked up writing techniques from examples of professional writing scraped from the web.

Along those lines, the Wikipedia guide has a caveat worth noting: While the list points out some obvious tells of, say, unaltered ChatGPT usage, it’s still composed of observations, not ironclad rules. A 2025 preprint cited on the page found that heavy users of large language models correctly spot AI-generated articles about 90 percent of the time. That sounds great until you realize that 10 percent are false positives, which is enough to potentially throw out some quality writing in pursuit of detecting AI slop.

Advertisement

Taking a step back, that probably means AI detection work might need to go deeper than flagging particular phrasing and delve (see what I did there?) more into the substantive factual content of the work itself.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Kash Patel Creating Tension With Mexico Because He Can’t Shut The Fuck Up On Social Media

Published

on

from the kashing-in dept

Kash Patel, FBI Director, is not very good at his job. There are plenty of examples to demonstrate that notion, from him apparently completely misunderstanding the purpose and protections of the 2nd Amendment and Minnesota gun laws (whatever your thoughts on gun rights might generally be), to his gathering of barely trained castoffs to serve in the FBI, to the absolute wild waste of resources he spent last summer trying to root out independent thought within his agency. None of this is justice. None of it is good policing. All of it is the result of putting a podcast host shitposter in charge of America’s federal police force. Ol’ Crazy-Eyes just might not be the right person for the role.

And if you’re going to be the leader of a federal police force, one of the skills you probably want to have is the capability of shutting the fuck up. Kash can’t do this. Rather than simply not answering, it appears Patel may have lied to Congress about the Epstein files (remember those?). In the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination, Patel blabbed about suspects all over social media and elsewhere, leading to wasted time and attention on completely innocent parties.

And, now, in the wake of an operation by the FBI that would appear to violate Mexican law, Patel decided to gush about the whole thing on the internet. What other option did he have, I wonder?

Ryan Wedding is a former Olympian who, by all accounts, turned himself into a violent cocaine drug kingpin working with a Mexican cartel. He was charged in Canada in 2015 for cocaine trafficking and in America in 2025 for that and for murder. Recently, Wedding found himself in American custody to face those charges. How that happened wasn’t initially disclosed in coverage of the arrest. But then Kash Patel got out his phone and decided to gush about the whole thing on internet.

Advertisement

On Friday, however, FBI Director Kash Patel announced the joint operation publicly on X. “Our FBI HRT teams executed with precision, discipline, and total professionalism alongside our Mexican partners to bring Ryan James Wedding back to face justice,” he wrote, sending shock waves through Mexico.

Except there’s a problem with that statement. A pretty big one, actually. Mexican law is very clear that foreign LEOs are not to operate on Mexican soil. That would make the FBI’s participation as outlined by Patel illegal. And that might create problems for his eventual prosecution and a really big headache for the Mexican government.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum scrambled to perform damage control, as foreign intervention in Mexico is politically toxic. She said that there was no U.S. involvement in the operation and that U.S. agents in Mexico are limited by law.

“I’m not going to get into a debate with the FBI director, nor do I want there to be a conflict,” Sheinbaum said at a press conference Tuesday. “What they, the U.S. authorities, told the Mexican authorities is that it was a voluntary surrender.” She pointed to a picture Wedding posted to his Instagram account at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico announcing that he was turning himself in.

Wedding’s lawyer disputes that account, because of course he did. Whether Wedding actually surrendered or not is unknown to me, of course, but I’ve been well-trained the past 13 months not to believe a single thing my government says, so who the fuck knows. Wedding’s lawyer claims he was handcuffed and transported to California and that this runs contrary to any claim any of this was voluntary. And because of all of this, the Mexican government now has both an internal problem and has to deal with an unreliable shitposting partner in the American government.

Patel’s rash decision to post about Wedding’s arrest online doesn’t help the situation right now. It opens Sheinbaum up to political attacks in Mexico and makes the U.S.-Mexico relationship even shakier. Under Trump, though, American law enforcement is playing fast and loose with not just the law but diplomatic relations.

I’m not exactly advocating that the American government carryout these illegal extraditions violating our allies’ own laws and then hiding it through silence. That would be crazy.

Advertisement

Instead, the point is that this administration’s goons, such as Kash Patel, are so shitty that they can’t even carry out such nefarious actions in silence because they can’t shut the fuck up about them.

Filed Under: claudia sheinbaum, doj, international incident, kash patel, mexico, ryan wedding, social media

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025