Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

The CDC Doesn’t Want You To See A CDC Report On How Effective COVID Vaccines Are

Published

on

from the why-not? dept

One of the most remarkable staffing decisions of the second Trump administration has been to allow the anti-vaxxers to run America’s health agencies. While RFK Jr. and his cadre of lieutenants prattle on about how they’re going to be super transparent, data-driven stewards of American health, their actions have put the lie to all of it. Vague statements about diseases, disinformation about the cause and source of other diseases, missed appointment deadlines for key personnel are all combined to create an HHS full of chaos, confusion, and the storied practice of CYA.

But these are ideological people, with some of the stupidest possible ideologies governing their actions. That’s how you get a situation where the CDC produces a report on the efficacy of recent COVID vaccines, following commonly used methodology, only to have the acting CDC director bury the report because he doesn’t like what it finds.

CDC scientists and insiders told the Post that the COVID-19 vaccine study went through the agency’s standard scientific review process and was slated for publication on March 19 in the agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). But acting CDC director Jay Bhattacharya blocked the scheduled publication and is holding the study, claiming he has concerns about its methodology.

According to a summary the Post obtained, the study concluded that between September and December of last year, healthy adults vaccinated with a 2025–2026 COVID-19 vaccine saw the risk of emergency department or urgent care visits cut by 50 percent, and the risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations cut by 55 percent, compared with healthy adults who did not get this season’s shot.

Bhattacharya reportedly took issue with the test-negative design of the study, which is a well-established method to examine real-world data on vaccine effectiveness. This type of observational study looks at people who have symptoms related to the disease of interest (in this case, COVID-19) and have the same test-seeking behavior. Those who test positive for the disease of interest become positive cases in the study, and those who test negative are test-negative controls. Researchers then compare the two groups based on vaccination status.

Advertisement

So there is no misunderstanding, Bhattacharya is completely full of shit here. He is not holding this CDC study back because he’s concerned about the test-negative methodology. I know that because the same CDC under the same acting Director published a study on the efficacy of flu shots that used the same test-negative method last month, a week before this same COVID vaccine study was to be published. If Bhattacharya had a problem with the method for the COVID study, why didn’t have the same problem with the flu shot study?

The answer is obvious: the methodology is not the issue here. Instead, the problem is the mRNA nature of most COVID vaccines. That, combined with Bhattacharya’s criticisms for COVID vaccines specifically, and his support for changing of the schedule and availability for them, means this study is at odds with his ideology and might be embarrassing for him personally.

Dan Jernigan, who headed CDC’s influenza division for six years and resigned last year in protest of Kennedy’s political interference at the agency, suggested to the Post that stalling the paper fits with Kennedy’s anti-vaccine agenda.

“The secretary has already taken steps to try and remove the availability of the vaccine from children and others, so if you’re putting out an MMWR that the vaccine is effective at preventing hospitalizations and medical care visits … that message is not in line with the direction you’ve been taking with the removal of the vaccine,” he said.

And there you have it: politics and personal CYA injected into matters of public health. Having those in charge of our health agencies prioritize their own personal stature over science, literally burying studies simply because they don’t like what they show, is certainly not going to lead to a more health America.

Advertisement

Filed Under: anti-vaxxers, cdc, covid, covid vaccines, jay bhattacharya, rfk jr.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Snap up this powerful Asus TUF F16 Gaming Laptop with an RTX 4050 for under $1,000 at Amazon

Published

on

If you’re keen to game on the move but also dealing with a tight budget, you’re in luck. Right now, you can buy the Asus TUF F16 Gaming Laptop at Amazon for $999.99 (was $1.199.99). That’s a pretty sweet deal for a gaming laptop which has an RTX 4050 GPU — ideal for 1080p gaming.

The Asus TUF F16 Gaming Laptop is a limited-time deal, so you’ll likely need to move fast. It offers a reasonable set of specs for the price, with a 16-inch full HD+ display with a 144Hz refresh rate working well alongside the budget-friendly RTX 4050 GPU. It also has 512GB of SSD storage, 16GB RAM, and an Intel Core i7-13620H CPU. The laptop looks pretty stylish, too, without completely succumbing to an excessive gamer aesthetic.

Asus TUF A16 Gaming Laptop, which was awarded a strong four out of five stars. It doesn’t quite compete with the very best gaming laptops, but it’s excellent value for money.

It has a good mixture of hardware that complements each component well. It looks pretty sleek yet stylish without being too in your face. It also has military-grade durability, so it can handle a more physical life if needed (but please don’t throw your laptop).

Little details like a backlit keyboard, HDMI port, Thunderbolt port, and plenty of USB ports all add up nicely as well. If you want one of the best laptops around, but also be able to game, this is worth checking out if you’re on a budget and can’t go all out with your purchase.

If you’re interested in seeing what else is out there, there are other cheap gaming laptop deals around. If you want a regular laptop, there are also some strong laptop deals to look through.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

FCC hands Netgear an effective monopoly on router sale in the US

Published

on

Following a total ban on non-US made routers, the Federal Communications Commission is allowing Netgear to sell wireless routers in the United States, practically giving it a monopoly. However, it’s unclear exactly why that approval was granted.

Black Nighthawk WiFi router with four upright antennas centered over a faded Federal Communications Commission seal featuring an eagle, stars, and a satellite icon in the background
Netgear Nighthawk router

In March, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission made the decision to ban imports of all foreign-made routers, due to national security concerns. At the time, no exemptions were made, so the ban affected practically every router being sold in the United States.
However, on April 14, Netgear got a rare reprieve. In an update to the list of equipment and services covered by Section 2 of the Secure Networks Act, the FCC lists Netgear under a very short list of conditional approvals for routers.
Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Is zero-copy a ‘liberation’ for data teams?

Published

on

BearingPoint’s Shruti Goyal talks about zero-copy architecture and why it’s ultimately a game-changer for data teams.

The world of data architecture, according to Shruti Goyal, has been defined by one process for the last decade: extract, transform and load (ETL).

ETL is a three-phase computing process where data is extracted from transactional systems or real-time source systems, transformed (meaning cleaned, enriched and standardised) into an analytical format, and loaded (or stored) into a data hub or warehouse for reporting and analytics.

“In practice, this meant building complex pipelines using tools like SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS), Azure Data Factory (ADF) and Microsoft Data Pipelines,” explains Goyal, who is manager of data analytics and AI at BearingPoint.

Advertisement

“ETL ensures data is reliable, consistent, and ready for analysis and decision-making.”

However, Goyal believes that after a decade of data dominance, ETL may be on its way out due to the rise of zero-copy architecture – an approach “where data is used where it already lives, without physically copying it into downstream systems”.

“Data is no longer physically moved – instead, access to it is,” she says.

What is zero-copy?

As Goyal explains to SiliconRepublic.com, zero-copy architecture allows users to query, share and access data directly at the source, as opposed to ETL’s transitory process.

Advertisement

Zero-copy enables this by using metadata, permissions and query pushdown “without duplicating the underlying data”.

Goyal says the catalyst for this change is analytics platform Microsoft Fabric, specifically its OneLake storage platform.

“Fabric introduces a unified logical data core that renders traditional data duplication obsolete,” she explains. “The two critical mechanisms are Mirroring, which keeps source systems reflected in near real-time, and Shortcuts, which allow entire multiterabyte databases to be surfaced into an analytics environment in seconds without any physical copying.

“While ADF remains relevant for complex orchestration scenarios, it is no longer the backbone of data movement – OneLake is.”

Advertisement

‘Long-overdue liberation’

Significant changes in any industry can be met with either joy or disdain depending on the circumstances, but Goyal says that for data teams, the so-called ‘death of ETL’ has been described as nothing short of “a long-overdue liberation”.

“Years spent tuning SSIS packages and mapping ADF data flows are giving way to managing metadata and governance policies instead,” she says. “The burden shifts from responding to pipeline failures to maintaining stable, governed shortcuts.

“The skillset evolves accordingly – the focus moves from pipeline engineering toward data governance, metadata management and strategic architecture, representing a significant elevation of the data management role.”

But why specifically is zero-copy being embraced over ETL?

Advertisement

For starters, Goyal says zero-copy is replacing ETL because it is faster, cheaper and “fundamentally more reliable”.

“Zero‑copy architectures replace ETL by letting analytics and AI access live data at its source – eliminating duplication, latency and governance complexity while reducing cost.

“In short, ETL is costly, slow and brittle; zero-copy is lean, live and self-governing.”

Why it’s significant

Goyal believes the transition from ETL is significant because it “represents a fundamental architectural shift”, allowing teams to manage metadata and governance instead of fragmented data copies and “fragile pipelines”.

Advertisement

“The move is from a reactive, maintenance-heavy model – characterised by late-night pipeline failure alerts – to a live feed of the business.

“Over time, this means organisations can make decisions on current data rather than yesterday’s batch, reduce infrastructure overhead significantly and redirect skilled data teams away from operational firefighting toward strategic work.”

Goyal adds that from a data strategy standpoint, zero-copy “changes what is fundamentally possible”.

“When the analytics layer reflects the business in near real-time rather than hours after the fact, decisions can be made on current ground truth,” she says. “The elimination of redundant storage means strategies can scale without proportional cost increases.

Advertisement

“Built-in governance and metadata persistence also mean organisations can trust their data more deeply – enabling AI workloads, reporting and operational systems to coexist confidently on a single, well-governed data estate.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

‘Trump Phone’ Sees Price Hike, But Still No Release Date (Or Actual Phone)

Published

on

from the sucker-born-every-minute dept

Last year the fraud-prone Trump organization announced a half-assed wireless phone company. As we noted at the time, calling this a “phone company” was generous; it was a lazy marketing rebrand of another, half-assed, “MAGA-focused” mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) named Patriot Mobile, which itself just resold T-Mobile service. So basically just another lazy Trump brand partnership.

The centerpiece of this effort was supposed to be a “bold” new $500 Trump T1 smartphone that the Trump org claimed would be “proudly designed and built in the United States” and released sometime last August. Not only was the device never going to be made in the States (all mention of that was quickly stripped from press materials), the August launch date came and went with no Trump phone.

It’s now April of 2026, and while there’s still no phone (despite a long line of rubes having plunked down $100 deposits), there is a revamped Trump Mobile website and a renewed promise of a slightly different phone, according to The Verge. This includes a revamped and gaudy new mock up of what the gold Trump T1 phone is supposed to look like, should it ever actually be released:

You’ll notice that the phone looks suspiciously like the HTC U24 Pro, a phone released two years ago and available for as little as $460 on Amazon (even less on places like eBay):

While the original “Trump phone” was announced with a $500 price tag, the backers of Trump’s latest grift insist that price was “promotional,” and the full price tag will be closer to around $1000:

“The phone is now listed with a “promotional price” of $499, which used to simply be its standard price. The site is still accepting $100 deposits, with the promise that you can “lock in” the “promotional pricing.” When I spoke to executives Eric Thomas and Don Hendrickson in February, they declared that $499 had been an “introductory” price, which would be rising after the relaunch — though they promised that early buyers would still be charged $499 total, and that the new price would be “less than $1,000.”

So there’s no phone or release date, but there’s already been a price hike on a lazy rebrand of an existing phone they just needed to spray paint gold and slap a Trump logo on. There’s simply no reason that doing this very basic rebrand should have taken so long (assuming they do plan to eventually released a phone), but as a concept the whole thing remains very on brand.

Advertisement

Filed Under: branding, con, donald trump, mvno, smartphone, trump phone, wireless

Companies: trump mobile

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The US Government Will Ask Data Centers How Much Power They Use

Published

on

The US federal government’s central energy information agency is planning to implement a mandatory nationwide survey of data centers focused on their energy use, according to a letter seen by WIRED. This survey would be the first effort of its type to collect basic information about data centers.

The letter was sent to senators Elizabeth Warren and Josh Hawley on April 9 by the head of the Energy Information Administration, Tristan Abbey, and comes in response to a previous inquiry from the senators about the EIA’s plans to get more information about data centers. WIRED reported on Hawley and Warren’s letter last month.

“Americans deserve to know how much energy data centers are sucking up and what that’s doing to their utility bills,” Warren told WIRED in a statement. “The EIA’s mandatory survey is an important first step towards holding data centers accountable, but people are hurting right now. I’m pushing EIA to collect and share this data as soon as possible.”

The EIA told WIRED that it doesn’t have any specifics to share beyond what is in the letter to the senators.

Advertisement

The explosion of data centers across the US has caused an outpouring of public concern and proposed legislation to rein in their resource use, as well as put moratoriums on their construction. But there’s surprisingly little official data collected on the industry.

Most details about data centers’ energy use—a particular worry for many voters in the face of mounting utility bills—are considered proprietary business information, and are usually not made public. In response to encouragement from the Trump administration to protect ratepayers, many data center developers are now turning to building their own power sources, known as behind-the-meter power. These facilities—many of which are gas-powered—introduce new concerns around air pollution and climate change. (On Tuesday, the NAACP filed a lawsuit against xAI alleging it was running behind-the-meter gas turbines on a data center in Mississippi without a permit and polluting the community around it. xAI did not immediately reply to a request for comment.)

The EIA conducts mandatory surveys of providers of various types of energy generation, including oil and gas production, electric generation, and renewables, as well as their industrial customers. In late March, a day before the senators sent their letter, the EIA announced that it would conduct a pilot survey in three areas of the country that have heavy data center development: Texas, Washington state, and the northern Virginia/DC metro area.

In the April 9 letter, Abbey says that the agency will announce a second tranche of pilot surveys “covering at least three more states.” Both surveys would be complete by late September. These two pilot studies, Abbey writes, are “a necessary step in the methodical development of a nationwide mandatory survey.”

Advertisement

Information being collected by the EIA from data centers in these pilots, according to the letter, includes not just information on annual electricity use, but also information on behind-the-meter power generation. The surveys, Abbey writes, will also include questions on the classification of different types of data centers; cooling systems; facility characteristics, like square footage; and IT specifications, including metrics on how efficiently a data center uses energy.

The letter still leaves a lot of questions unanswered about the structure of the pilots.

According to the letter, the pilot won’t ask every respondent for the full set of metrics, but will rather tailor questions “to the particular location of each data center facility.” The current pilot also asks the 196 companies identified across the three regions to choose just one location to report metrics on. The EIA did not answer questions about how it determined which locations should receive which questions, or if it provided any requirements to survey respondents about how to go about choosing which data center location to provide information about.

The EIA also did not answer questions from WIRED about when it plans to launch the second set of pilot surveys, the states that will be included, or the possible timing of a national mandatory survey.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Save $100 as the Apple Watch Series 11 drops back to its best price

Published

on

Most smartwatches ask you to choose between looking good and doing a lot, but the Apple Watch Series 11 has never been willing to make that particular compromise.

That combination of capability and design is now more accessible, with the Apple Watch Series 11 available for $299 reduced from its usual $399 only at Amazon.

Apple Watch Series 11 on a sunset backgroundApple Watch Series 11 on a sunset background

Save $100 as the Apple Watch Series 11 drops back to its best price

The Apple Watch Series 11 won’t make you choose between looking good and doing a lot, and at this price it’s a lot more accessible too.

Advertisement

View Deal

The health monitoring package here is genuinely broad, covering ECG readings, blood oxygen levels, sleep apnoea detection, and a sleep score that gives you a simple overnight quality rating rather than a wall of data you have to interpret yourself.

Advertisement

New to Series 11 is the ability to spot signs of chronic high blood pressure and send hypertension notifications, which moves the watch meaningfully closer to the kind of passive health monitoring that used to require a clinical setting.

Those health features sit alongside a full fitness tracking suite, with built-in GPS, heart rate zones, training load tracking, and a Workout Buddy feature powered by Apple Intelligence that offers real-time personalised coaching via Bluetooth headphones connected to a nearby iPhone.

Advertisement

The Whatsapp LogoThe Whatsapp Logo

Get Updates Straight to Your WhatsApp

Advertisement

Join Now

The display is a superdurable glass panel rated as twice as scratch-resistant as the Series 10, and the watch carries a 50-metre water resistance rating alongside IP6X dust resistance, so it is genuinely built to go wherever you do.

Advertisement

Battery life is rated at up to 24 hours of normal use, with a fast charging option that recovers eight hours of use from just 15 minutes plugged in, which is the kind of spec that makes forgetting to charge it far less catastrophic.

Safety features including Fall Detection, Crash Detection, and Emergency SOS round out a package that functions as much as a quiet background safeguard as it does a fitness companion or notification hub.

The Apple Watch Series 11 at this price is worth serious consideration for iPhone users who want a wearable that handles health tracking, fitness, and everyday connectivity without needing to think too hard about which one it prioritises, though you will need an iPhone 11 or later running iOS 26 to use it.

Advertisement

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Latest AI (coffee) buzz: Starbucks launches ChatGPT app to help customers discover their next drink

Published

on

Prompting the Starbucks app inside ChatGPT returns suggestions related to various coffee drinks. (Starbucks Images)

Starbucks is getting in on the agentic buzz.

The Seattle-based coffee giant launched a beta app inside ChatGPT on Wednesday, leveraging OpenAI’s chatbot to help customers discover drinks and capture their “vibe.”

Customers can access the app by enabling it inside ChatGPT’s app directory. Start a conversation prompt with “@starbucks” to customize orders and choose a location to order from. While the order can be started in ChatGPT it has to be finished in the Starbucks app or on Starbucks.com.

You don’t need to just have a drink flavor in mind. The bot will even offer up suggestions based on a photo of your current outfit. Based on what I’m wearing right now, I’m not sure I’d want to drink that, but you get the point.

“Over the past year, one thing has become clear: customers aren’t always starting with a menu,” Paul Riedel, Starbucks senior vice president of digital and loyalty, said in a statement to CNBC. “They’re starting with a feeling. … We wanted to meet customers right in that moment of inspiration and make it easier than ever to find a drink that fits.”

Advertisement

Other companies are leaning into partnerships with OpenAI to reach customers through ChatGPT, including Expedia, Zillow, Target, Walmart and others.

Starbucks is in the midst of an operational overhaul under CEO Brian Niccol, who joined the company in September 2024. Niccol led a similar revamp previously as the top executive at Chipotle, and at Starbucks is pairing old-school service standards with new technology.

One of those new tech components is Green Dot Assist, an AI-powered tool built on Microsoft’s Azure OpenAI platform that helps baristas look up drink recipes, troubleshoot equipment issues, and figure out where to put staff during a rush. The technology went from a 35-store pilot last June to full deployment across North American stores in November. 

The changes seem to be having an impact.

Advertisement

In January, Starbucks reported its first U.S. comparable transaction growth in two years. Both loyalty members and casual customers are visiting more often. Service times at peak are running below the company’s four-minute target, even with the increased traffic.

Starbucks also announced in March that it plans to open a corporate office in Nashville, Tenn., in a bid to grow across North America and establish “a more strategic presence” in the Southeast region of the U.S. The move will impact some Seattle-based jobs related to the coffee giant’s North American supply-chain operations.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Spotify is selling books now

Published

on

A collaboration between Spotify and Bookshop.org that allows readers to purchase physical books in the Spotify app is now live in the US and UK.

Rather than positioning audiobooks as the hard copy-killer, Spotify is encouraging you to see them as complimentary to one another. First announced back in February, the new partnership with Bookshop.org appears to be an acknowledgement from Spotify that physical still reigns supreme in the book world. Bookshop is a digital marketplace that enables indie booksellers to take their businesses online, and Spotify says any purchase made through its app will “directly support those bookshops and the authors who brought the story to life.”

When viewing an audiobook on Spotify, where available you should now see a “Get a copy for your bookshelf” link that redirects you to the Bookshop.org website, which takes over the rest of the purchase and shipping process, reports TechCrunch. The feature is now live on Android, with iOS support arriving next week.

Key to this partnership is the new Page Match feature that Spotify launched in February, which allows readers to sync their progress between audiobooks and physical or ebooks so they can jump between formats seamlessly. When reading a paperback, you can use your phone camera to scan the page you reach and continue from that point in the audiobook. It also allows you to scan ereader pages so you can pick up when you left off in the audiobook, and vice versa.

Advertisement

Spotify has today expanded Page Match to support more than 30 new languages, including French, German and Swedish, while Audiobook Recaps are now available on Android. Introduced last year, initially for iOS users, these AI-powered audio summaries refresh you on your progress before you start reading, becoming available once you pass the 10-minute threshold in a book.

Spotify launched audiobooks in 2022 and now offers 15 hours of free listening time a month to Premium subscribers.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

After sale of its shoe business, Allbirds pivots to AI

Published

on

After selling its shoe brand and assets last month for $39 million, Allbirds is pivoting to AI. Of course, the company is also changing its name, since the footwear brand “Allbirds” was part of the sale. Introducing: NewBird AI, a “fully integrated GPU-as-a-Service and AI-native cloud solutions provider,” the company announced via its investor relations site on Wednesday.

The rebranded AI company also announced a $50 million investment from an undisclosed institutional investor in the form of a convertible financing facility.

It’s objectively pretty funny that Allbirds is becoming an AI company — not because it’s unusual for companies to pivot, but because of how extreme this pivot is. The maker of the shoes once craved by the Silicon Valley tech set is now going to be a provider of GPUs. It’s somewhat absurd — and risky — but you can see how the business came to this decision. After the asset and brand sale, Allbirds can keep the public company’s shell (it’s been traded on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “BIRD”) and then reuse it to invest in the hot AI sector.

This recalls the time in 2017 when the Long Island Iced Tea company pivoted to the blockchain, prompting the stock to jump some 275% after the rebranding. That pivot didn’t pan out, as the NASDAQ stock exchange delisted the stock the following year after Bitcoin fever died down.

Advertisement

Allbirds-turned-NewBird is likely hoping for a different outcome.

The company says that the financing and the asset sale are still subject to stockholder approval, with a meeting planned to take place on May 18. If the sale goes through, stockholders will receive a dividend during the third quarter. The new owner of the Allbirds brand and assets, American Exchange Group, will continue to make products for Allbirds customers.

Meanwhile, NewBird AI plans to use the new financing to acquire GPU assets, which it will offer to customers seeking AI compute capacity. Over time, the company hopes to grow its service offerings through partnerships and even strategic mergers and acquisitions — if the opportunity arises.

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This Country Is Home To The Most Deployed US Troops In 2026

Published

on





The United States has troops deployed all over the world, continuously growing and changing based on security and political priorities. U.S. troop numbers are estimated to be around 200,000 over the past decade, but the exact numbers could be different since the Pentagon doesn’t publish everything — these numbers could be higher. 

However, from what information we do have access to, we can see that Japan has the most U.S. troops, with 61,684 total personnel in 2025 — Japan isn’t considered a threat, but it does have high-tech next-gen fighter jets in the works. This number could have changed in 2026, however, after the start of the conflict in Iran. As of March 2026, there are 50,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East. 

The exact location of the troops is not public information, although they have historically been stationed around Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait. It’s not clear if the troops came from Japan or other countries with a lot of U.S. presence, which included Germany with 49,338 troops, South Korea with 26,722 troops, Italy with 15,365 troops, and the United Kingdom with 11,592 troops in 2025. This would shift these previous numbers as well.

Advertisement

What determines which countries U.S. troops are deployed in?

In general, U.S. troops are deployed based on the ever-changing geopolitical climate. If there is a country that seems more threatening to the United States’ safety, this is likely where troops would be deployed to. For this reason, the numbers are ever-changing based on politics, wars, tensions, and warnings — the goal is often to deter attacks, protect supply chains, and generally protecting national security. 

However, it seems like the United States has troops in areas where we aren’t currently feeling a lot of tension. For example, why are we in Japan? These stations are selected due to their navel access and rapid response capabilities. There are also some military bases that were built back in World War II that the United States continues to use, largely in Japan and Germany. This would explain why those two countries have so much military presence each year. The U.S. similarly set up bases in South Korea after the Korean War to fight communism as well as around Europe during the Cold War — in the early 1950s, there were over 400,000 troops around Europe to stop the Soviet Union from expanding. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025