A senior manager at Bloomberg LP is facing serious allegations after a lawsuit claimed the company’s internal chat system was used to send explicit and unwanted messages to an employee.

The case, filed in New York Supreme Court on April 13, accuses the company of failing to act on repeated complaints.

The lawsuit was brought by Charles Kyle O’Rourke, an account manager who has worked at Bloomberg since 2019.

He claims senior manager Peter Elliot sent him inappropriate sexual messages during work conversations, creating what the complaint describes as a hostile work environment.

According to the filing, the messages were sent in February 2025 while O’Rourke was discussing travel plans.

The complaint alleges Elliot made crude comments involving sex acts and personal behavior that were not welcome.

One message reportedly included explicit language about travel and sexual activity, which O’Rourke says crossed professional boundaries.

“Over the course of his nearly six-year tenure, Mr. O’Rourke has been subjected to repeated acts of sexual harassment,” the complaint states, adding that the situation worsened due to what it describes as a lack of support from management, NY Post reported.

O’Rourke says he reported the messages to senior leaders, but no action was taken. The lawsuit claims the harassment continued despite his complaints, placing responsibility on the company for not stepping in.

Bloomberg Lawsuit Alleges Retaliation

The filing also includes claims of retaliation. O’Rourke alleges that after he raised concerns and asked for workplace accommodations related to ADHD and anxiety, his direct manager, David LaPaglia, began treating him unfairly.

The complaint says LaPaglia micromanaged his work, reduced his client responsibilities, and told clients he was no longer with the company.

According to NationalToday , as a result of the situation, O’Rourke took a medical leave of absence on August 19, which the lawsuit describes as a response to pressure that pushed him toward leaving his job.

The case brings several legal claims against Bloomberg under New York State and City laws.

These include allegations of a hostile work environment, sex discrimination, disability discrimination, and retaliation.

The lawsuit also argues that Bloomberg is responsible for the actions of its managers because of their leadership roles.

O’Rourke is seeking damages and is asking the court to require changes to Bloomberg’s internal policies, including stronger harassment reporting systems and better employee protections.

In response, a spokesperson for Bloomberg said the company has reviewed the claims and believes they have no merit.

Originally published on vcpost.com

Three Los Angeles-area residents were recently convicted in an unusual insurance fraud scheme using a person in a bear costume to fake attacks on high-end vehicles to collect insurance payouts.

As part of the California Department of Insurance’s Operation Bear Claw, Alfiya Zuckerman, 39, of Valley Village; Ruben Tamrazian, 26, of Glendale; and Vahe Muradkhanyan, 32, of Glendale, pleaded no contest to felony insurance fraud and were sentenced to 180 days in jail and two years of supervised probation and were ordered to pay restitution.

A fourth suspect, Ararat Chirkinian, 39, of Glendale, is scheduled to return to court in September for a preliminary hearing.

The bear costume used in the alleged January insurance scam.  (California Department of Insurance / Fox News)

PERSON IN BEAR COSTUME ATTACKS LUXURY CARS IN INSURANCE SCAM, CALIFORNIA INSURERS SAY

The investigation began after an insurance company flagged a suspicious claim tied to a Jan. 28, 2024, incident in Lake Arrowhead. 

The suspects claimed a bear entered their 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost and caused interior damage, submitting video footage as evidence.

Detectives later determined the “bear” in the video was a person wearing a bear costume and uncovered two additional fraudulent claims submitted to separate insurance companies involving the same date and location but tied to a 2015 Mercedes G63 AMG and a 2022 Mercedes E350.

Ararat Chirkinian, left, Alfiya Zuckerman and Ruben Tamrazian were arrested in the alleged insurance fraud.  (California Department of Insurance / Fox News)

VISA REPORT HIGHLIGHTS EMERGING SCAMS TARGETING CONSUMERS AND TRAVELERS

A biologist from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife reviewed the video and concluded the animal shown was “clearly a human in a bear suit,” according to authorities.

Detectives executed a search warrant and recovered the costume from the suspects’ home.

Officials said the total loss to the insurance companies was $141,839, though the names of the businesses were not released.

Investigators said the insurance fraud scheme involved more than $100,000. (iStock / iStock)

“What may have looked unbelievable turned out to be exactly that, and now those responsible are being held accountable,” Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara wrote in a statement Thursday. “My Department’s investigators uncovered the facts, exposed this scam and helped bring these defendants to justice.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

“Insurance fraud is a serious crime that drives up costs for consumers, and no scheme is too outrageous for us to investigate.”

By Jennifer Nash

Originally published on April 15, 2026

The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell 3.0 points to 95.8, dropping below the index’s historical average for the first time since April 2025. This was below

David Ferrera is a medical device engineer, entrepreneur, and inventor with nearly 30 years of experience in neurovascular and interventional medicine.

Based in Lake Forest, California, he has built a career focused on turning clinical ideas into real products that improve patient care.

He began his career at Boston Scientific before moving into more specialised roles in vascular and neurovascular technology. Over time, he co-founded and led several companies, including Micrus Endovascular, MindFrame, and Blockade Medical. Each company focused on solving specific problems in stroke treatment and interventional procedures. These ventures were later acquired by major industry players such as Johnson & Johnson, Terumo, Covidien, and Balt.

Ferrera is now CEO of RC Medical, a venture studio that partners with physicians to develop and commercialise new medical devices. He is also CEO and Chairman of Sonorous Neuro. His work centres on building structured, milestone-driven companies that address real clinical needs.

He holds more than 80 U.S. and international patents and is the author of Innovation in Translation, published by Advantage-Forbes. His approach is grounded in discipline, clear problem definition, and practical execution.

Beyond his professional work, Ferrera has been active in philanthropy, serving as Chair of the American Heart Association’s Orange County Heart & Stroke Ball. His career reflects a consistent focus on building solutions that move from concept to clinical use.

David Ferrera on Building What Actually Works in MedTech

Q: How did your career in medical devices begin?

I started at Boston Scientific in the early 1990s. I had a background in plastics engineering, so I was drawn to how materials and design could solve medical problems. Early on, I realised that the field moves quickly, but only when products actually work in real procedures.

Q: What was your first major step into leadership?

Co-founding Micrus Endovascular was a turning point. We were focused on neurovascular devices. At that time, the space was still developing. We had to build technology while also proving clinical value. That company was later acquired by Johnson & Johnson, which gave me a clear view of how larger organisations evaluate products.

Q: What did you learn from your time at MindFrame?

At MindFrame, I led product development and clinical research. We worked on one of the early mechanical thrombectomy systems for stroke. I remember watching cases where time was critical. Every delay mattered. That shaped how I think about design. A device is not just about function. It is about workflow.

Q: You have been part of several acquisitions. How did that shape your approach?

Each acquisition reinforced the same lesson. You need structure from the start. Regulatory planning, manufacturing, and clinical data cannot be afterthoughts. If those pieces are not aligned early, the company struggles later.

Q: Why did you decide to build RC Medical as a venture studio?

After building individual companies, I wanted a more repeatable model. At RC Medical, we partner with physicians who see problems every day. We validate early. We build in stages. We keep teams lean. It allows us to work on multiple ideas while maintaining discipline.

Q: How do physician partnerships influence your work?

They are essential. Physicians understand where procedures break down. One doctor once showed me a case where a device required multiple exchanges. It added several minutes. That insight led to a redesign focused on reducing steps. That is where real innovation comes from.

Q: What role does Sonorous Neuro play in your current work?

Sonorous Neuro is one of the companies formed through this model. I serve as CEO and Chairman. The focus is neurovascular care. We are working on improving how procedures are performed, especially in stroke intervention. It is about precision and efficiency.

Q: What challenges have you seen in recent years?

Regulatory expectations have increased. Capital is more selective. You cannot rely on momentum alone. You need clear milestones and strong data. That has made discipline even more important.

Q: How do you stay close to what matters in the field?

I spend time with physicians. I review clinical data. I focus on what is happening in procedure rooms, not just what is being presented at conferences. Real feedback comes from real use.

Q: How has your leadership style changed over time?

Early on, I focused heavily on technical details. Over time, I shifted towards alignment. Clear goals. Clear accountability. Teams perform better when expectations are simple and direct.

Q: What advice would you give to someone entering this space?

Start with the problem, not the technology. Spend time understanding the clinical need. Then build with discipline. Big ideas are common. Turning them into products that work is the hard part.

NEW YORK — Alphabet Inc. Class C shares traded modestly lower in early morning action Thursday, slipping about 0.15 percent to around $333.97 as Wall Street digested recent gains and prepared for the tech giant’s first-quarter 2026 earnings report later this month amid a record capital expenditure plan focused on artificial intelligence infrastructure.

The stock opened near recent levels after closing Wednesday at approximately $334.47, reflecting a quiet start to trading with volume building steadily. Alphabet has shown resilience in 2026, climbing roughly 6-7 percent year-to-date despite broader market swings tied to geopolitical tensions and elevated AI investment costs across the sector.

With the Q1 earnings call scheduled for April 29, analysts expect another solid beat on revenue and profit, driven by robust Google Search advertising, YouTube growth and accelerating contributions from Google Cloud. Consensus estimates point to earnings per share around $2.62 to $2.63, with revenue projected to continue its steady expansion.

The standout theme for 2026 remains Alphabet’s aggressive bet on AI. The company guided for capital expenditures between $175 billion and $185 billion this year — nearly double 2025 levels — to fund data centers, custom TPUs, networking gear and servers needed to power its expanding AI models and cloud offerings. This massive outlay has sparked debate: some view it as a necessary masterstroke to maintain leadership against rivals like Microsoft and OpenAI, while others worry about near-term margin pressure and the risk of negative free cash flow if returns on the spending lag.

Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat and CEO Sundar Pichai have emphasized that the investments position Alphabet for long-term dominance in generative AI, cloud computing and enterprise solutions. Google Cloud has posted accelerating growth in recent quarters, benefiting from demand for AI training and inference capabilities. Yet the sheer scale of spending has unsettled some investors, contributing to periods of volatility even as core advertising revenue remains highly profitable.

Antitrust matters continue to loom in the background. A favorable ruling in the U.S. search monopoly case provided relief earlier in the year, allowing the stock to rally toward all-time highs near $350 in February. However, ongoing remedy discussions, potential appeals and separate European Union probes — including scrutiny of the Play Store and AI training data practices — keep regulatory risk on the radar. A large EU fine could materialize in 2026 if compliance issues persist, though Alphabet has historically navigated such challenges while maintaining strong financial performance.

Search advertising, which still accounts for the bulk of revenue, faces evolving competition from AI-powered chat interfaces and changing user habits. Google has integrated Gemini deeply across its products, aiming to defend its dominant position while monetizing AI features. YouTube continues as a growth engine, with Shorts and premium subscriptions driving engagement and revenue diversification.

Waymo, Alphabet’s autonomous vehicle unit, represents another high-potential area. The robotaxi service has expanded in select cities, generating increasing buzz as a future revenue contributor, though it remains in the investment phase with meaningful profits still years away.

Other bets under the “Other Bets” segment, including moonshot projects in health, energy and robotics, continue to consume capital but offer asymmetric upside if any achieve commercial success.

Analysts remain generally constructive on Alphabet despite the heavy AI spending. Several firms have raised price targets following recent earnings beats and the antitrust clarity, with some highlighting the stock’s reasonable valuation relative to growth prospects. The shares trade at a forward multiple that many consider attractive compared to pure-play AI names experiencing higher volatility.

Retail and institutional interest stays elevated. The stock’s inclusion in major indexes and its role as a core holding in tech-heavy portfolios ensure steady attention. Recent sessions have shown Alphabet holding support levels even as broader tech sentiment fluctuates with news from the Middle East conflict and oil price movements.

Thursday’s minor dip appears driven more by profit-taking after a positive Wednesday session than by any fundamental shift. Broader market conditions, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average trading near 48,592 on ceasefire hopes, have supported risk assets overall, providing a favorable backdrop for large-cap tech names like Alphabet.

As investors look toward the April 29 report, key metrics to watch include Google Cloud revenue growth rate, advertising pricing trends, operating margins after increased AI-related costs and any updated commentary on capex allocation or AI product monetization timelines.

The company exited 2025 with strong momentum, posting record quarterly revenue in Q4. Analysts project continued top-line expansion in 2026, though the heavy investment phase could weigh on profitability metrics in the near term. Free cash flow dynamics will draw particular scrutiny given the scale of infrastructure buildout.

Alphabet’s balance sheet remains fortress-like, with substantial cash reserves providing flexibility for acquisitions, share repurchases or further R&D. The company has consistently returned capital to shareholders through buybacks while funding ambitious growth initiatives.

For long-term investors, the narrative centers on Alphabet’s ability to translate massive AI spending into sustainable competitive advantages and higher-margin revenue streams. Success in cloud, autonomous mobility and AI-enhanced search could drive significant value creation over the coming decade.

Short-term traders, meanwhile, are navigating the stock’s sensitivity to quarterly guidance, regulatory headlines and shifts in AI hype cycles. The shares have experienced swings throughout 2026 but have generally trended higher on the strength of core operations.

As trading progressed Thursday morning, GOOG held near the $334 level with limited downside pressure. The session offered little new catalyst, leaving focus squarely on the upcoming earnings cycle and any incremental news around AI advancements or antitrust developments.

Alphabet’s story in 2026 exemplifies the tension facing big tech: balancing enormous upfront investments in transformative technology against the need to deliver consistent shareholder returns. With a market capitalization still among the world’s largest, even modest percentage moves translate into billions in value.

Whether the current capex surge proves prescient or overly aggressive will likely define investor sentiment through the remainder of the year. For now, the stock’s modest pullback appears contained, reflecting healthy digestion rather than concern.

With Q1 results just two weeks away, Alphabet enters a critical period where execution on AI initiatives and clarity on spending returns could set the tone for the rest of 2026.

Commerzbank’s analysis shows energy market volatility pressures the Thai Baht (THB) due to heavy energy imports, increasing costs and economic vulnerabilities, with the USD/THB rate reflecting these challenges.

Key Points

• Impact of Energy Market Volatility: Commerzbank notes that global energy fluctuations in early 2026 exert significant pressure on the Thai Baht (THB). As Thailand relies heavily on energy imports, the USD/THB exchange rate reflects rising costs and economic vulnerabilities, especially amid supply disruptions.
• Economic Vulnerabilities: Thailand’s reliance on stable energy for manufacturing and tourism amplifies the Baht’s vulnerability. A negative current account indicates sensitivity to energy price spikes, reminiscent of past crises where the exchange rate exceeded 37.00.
• Policy Responses and Future Projections: The Bank of Thailand must balance inflation and growth, considering potential interventions as USD/THB rates may fluctuate between 36.50 and 37.50. Currency traders closely monitor energy markets and policy responses, as Thailand faces pressures similar to other Asian energy-importing nations.

Impact of Energy Market Volatility on the Thai Baht

Commerzbank’s analysis indicates that global energy market fluctuations are putting significant downward pressure on the Thai Baht (THB). As Thailand imports over 50% of its energy, mainly through crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG), rising global energy costs have worsened its trade balance. Consequently, the USD/THB exchange rate has become a focal point for currency traders, closely monitoring the potential policy reactions from the Bank of Thailand (BOT).

Historical trends, such as the energy crisis of 2022, have highlighted the Baht’s sensitivity to energy price changes. During the 2022 energy crisis, the USD/THB pair surged beyond 37.00. Likewise, current market conditions reflect similar pressures, prompting analysts to cite this precedent when evaluating potential currency trends.

Thailand’s Economic Vulnerabilities and Policy Considerations

Thailand’s economy exhibits considerable vulnerabilities, particularly in its manufacturing and tourism sectors, which rely heavily on stable energy prices. Increased energy costs threaten to inflate production expenses while simultaneously diminishing tourist spending power.

The BOT is caught between the need to manage inflation and support economic growth, leading to a relatively hawkish monetary stance. This complex dynamic may result in further depreciation of the Baht, as the central bank aims to control inflation amidst the pressures from rising energy prices and their macroeconomic impacts.

Comparative Currency Performance and Future Projections

In the broader context of Asian foreign exchange markets, while Thailand faces substantial challenges, other energy-importing nations like India and the Philippines are similarly impacted. However, Thailand’s larger exposure in terms of its current account amplifies its vulnerabilities. Performance metrics reveal that the USD/THB has increased by 4.2% YTD, primarily due to the energy import bill, diverging from other currencies facing less acute pressures. As traders closely monitor both energy markets and potential policy responses, projections for the USD/THB are anticipated to fluctuate between 36.50 and 37.50, reflecting ongoing economic uncertainties.

Other People are Reading

WASHINGTON — The U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports along the Strait of Hormuz entered its third day Thursday with American forces turning back at least 13 vessels, according to Pentagon officials, as diplomatic efforts to extend a fragile ceasefire showed signs of strain and Iran issued fresh threats to disrupt shipping across the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon that the blockade, which began Monday, remains “fully implemented and effective,” with no Iranian-linked ships successfully exiting or entering targeted ports since enforcement ramped up. Central Command confirmed that U.S. Navy assets, including destroyers and support vessels from the USS George H.W. Bush carrier strike group, have intercepted and redirected multiple tankers attempting to depart Iranian waters.

The operation targets all maritime traffic to and from Iranian ports and coastal areas while allowing neutral transit through the international waters of the Strait of Hormuz itself. Ship-tracking data from firms such as Kpler and Vortexa showed sharply reduced activity, with marine traffic down more than 90 percent from pre-war averages of over 100 vessels daily. Some non-Iranian tankers continued limited passages, but Iran-linked vessels largely remained stalled or turned away.

The blockade forms a key pressure point in the ongoing Iran war that erupted Feb. 28 with U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian leadership, missile sites and nuclear facilities. Iran retaliated by effectively shutting the strait to most commercial traffic, disrupting roughly 20 percent of global oil trade and contributing to spikes in energy prices. A two-week ceasefire brokered by Pakistan took effect April 8, pausing direct U.S.-Iran exchanges, but the truce faces expiration April 21 without a breakthrough on nuclear issues or reopening the waterway.

Pentagon briefings Thursday highlighted minesweeping operations to counter potential Iranian threats, with officials warning that Tehran retains the capability to deploy sea mines, fast-attack boats and missiles despite heavy losses to its navy and air defenses earlier in the conflict. Gen. Dan Caine, briefing reporters, said the U.S. has “maximal posture” in the region and stands ready to respond to any provocation.

Iranian officials condemned the blockade as “economic terrorism” and threatened to halt all trade in the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Red Sea if it continues. State media claimed at least one supertanker and a bulk carrier carrying food supplies successfully transited the strait, though independent tracking data offered conflicting accounts. A Chinese oil tanker reportedly defied the measures in one instance, prompting Beijing to label the U.S. action “dangerous and irresponsible” while simultaneously urging Iran to reopen the strait.

The economic stakes remain enormous. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the conduit for about one-fifth of the world’s traded oil and significant volumes of liquefied natural gas. Disruptions have already driven oil prices above $100 per barrel at times, fueling inflation concerns and straining global supply chains. Former UK officials warned of a potential humanitarian crisis in Iran and neighboring countries if the waterway stays blocked for an extended period, citing risks to food and fuel imports.

President Donald Trump described the blockade as a “brilliant strategy” to force Iran toward a deal, claiming China is “very happy” with U.S. efforts to secure the strait and that Beijing has agreed not to supply weapons to Tehran. Trump signaled possible new talks in the coming days, stating the situation is “close to over” if Iran accepts terms on its nuclear program.

However, Defense Secretary Hegseth escalated rhetoric, warning that the U.S. is prepared to strike Iranian energy infrastructure if Tehran rejects a peace deal before the ceasefire deadline. He emphasized the blockade will continue “as long as it takes” to cut off Iran’s oil revenue.

Pakistan continued mediation efforts, with its army chief meeting Iranian officials in Tehran on Thursday. Separate rare direct talks between Israeli and Lebanese leaders were expected, though Hezbollah’s exclusion raised doubts about broader de-escalation. Parallel Israeli operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon have continued despite the U.S.-Iran truce, adding complexity to regional dynamics.

Maritime security firms reported cautious navigation, with many vessels opting for longer routes or delaying transits due to risk. Some tankers loitered near the strait’s entrances, while others used alternative paths announced by Iran earlier in the conflict. Minesweeping by U.S. and allied forces has become a priority to mitigate hazards that could prolong disruptions even after any political resolution.

International reactions varied. China pushed back against the blockade while pressing Iran to restore normal traffic, reflecting Beijing’s heavy reliance on Gulf oil. European allies expressed concern over energy price volatility and called for de-escalation. The International Monetary Fund outlined adverse scenarios involving prolonged strait closure, warning of higher inflation, tighter financial conditions and potential macro instability extending into 2027.

Oil markets showed mixed movement Thursday, with Brent crude fluctuating as traders balanced blockade effectiveness against ceasefire hopes. Energy analysts noted that even partial normalization could take weeks due to insurance issues, crew concerns and physical hazards like mines.

Inside Iran, the regime faces mounting internal pressure from economic isolation and military setbacks. The death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in early strikes led to a leadership transition, with the government projecting defiance while dealing with blackouts, internet disruptions and civilian casualties from the initial campaign.

For global shipping, the strait’s vulnerability underscores long-standing concerns about chokepoints in critical trade routes. Experts emphasized that no single actor fully controls the waterway, which spans territorial waters of Iran and Oman, complicating enforcement and legal questions under international maritime law.

As the ceasefire deadline approaches, the blockade serves as both leverage and risk. Success in forcing concessions could hasten an end to hostilities, but any miscalculation risks renewed direct confrontation, mine incidents or proxy attacks that further disrupt shipping from the Gulf to the Red Sea.

Pentagon officials stressed the operation’s impartial enforcement against all nations’ vessels tied to Iranian ports, aiming to maximize economic pressure without broader escalation. Additional U.S. assets, including a third carrier strike group and minesweepers, have bolstered regional presence.

For now, the Strait of Hormuz remains a tense flashpoint where military posturing, diplomatic maneuvering and economic consequences intersect. Whether the blockade accelerates a deal or prolongs instability will likely shape oil markets, global inflation and regional security for months to come.

Analysts urged vigilance, noting that even limited incidents could spike insurance premiums and reroute trade with lasting effects on energy costs worldwide. With talks ongoing and the ceasefire window narrowing, Thursday’s developments offered cautious hope for resolution alongside persistent risks of renewed disruption.