The James Bond franchise has a long history of getting pop stars to record its theme songs (perhaps most memorably with Live and Let Die), and it looks like that tradition will now extend to video game adaptations about the fictional spy. IO Interactive has announced that Lana Del Rey co-wrote and performed the theme for 007 First Light, the developer’s playable James Bond origin story.

“First Light” is written and performed by Lana Del Rey and composer David Arnold, and like the moody and abstract opening credits released alongside the song, could vaguely gesture at the themes of the game. IO Interactive has previously said that its game focuses on a young, inexperienced and more reckless Bond, before he developed his trademark cool. The developer is also integrating the stealth mechanics it perfected in Hitman into the upcoming game.

Del Rey’s personal gaming experience may begin and end with her hit “Video Games,” which was apparently written about a former boyfriend’s love of World of Warcraft, but the artist does know how to write a song with Bond in mind. Lana Del Rey shared in 2024 that her song “24” from the album Honeymoon was originally written for 2017’s Spectre, one of several songs that were cast aside in favor of Sam Smith’s “Writing’s on the Wall.”

007 First Light is coming to Xbox Series X/S, PlayStation 5 and PC on May 27, 2026. A Nintendo Switch 2 version of the game is now coming out this summer.

Apple TV+ has quietly built one of the more interesting libraries among the popular streaming platforms. Somewhere between the buzzy dramas and the shows that everyone seems to be talking about, there are a handful of genuinely great series just sitting there, unwatched.

So let’s fix that this weekend. Whether you are in the mood for a thriller that messes with your grip on reality or something that will haunt you using nothing but sound, there is something here for you. Here are three underrated Apple TV+ shows worth your time.

We also have guides to the best new movies to stream, the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best free movies, and the best movies on Amazon Prime Video.

Counterpart (2017)

Howard Silk has spent 30 years doing a quiet, unremarkable job at a Berlin-based UN agency, shuffling papers and exchanging coded messages he does not understand. One day, he is told the truth: there is a crossing beneath the building to a parallel Earth, one that split from ours in 1987 and has since gone in a very different direction. To make things worse, his counterpart from that other world, also called Howard Silk, is nothing like him. Same face, same history, but entirely different man.

J.K. Simmons plays both versions with such complete distinction that you never lose track of which Howard you are watching. It is one of the best dual performances I have seen in recent TV shows. The show wraps its parallel world concept in the thick atmosphere of Cold War espionage: Berlin backstreets, dead drops, sleeper agents, and the paranoia of never knowing whose side anyone is really on.

You can watch Counterpart on Apple TV.

Calls (2021)

There are no visuals here in this underrated Apple TV show. What you get instead is a series of phone calls between strangers, laid over abstract, shifting patterns of light and sound, as something catastrophic and inexplicable begins to unravel the world around them. Each of the nine short episodes drops you into a different conversation, most of them terrifying in the quietest possible way.

The cast is stacked: Pedro Pascal, Aubrey Plaza, Lily Collins, Rosario Dawson, and others, none of whom you ever see. You just hear them, and that turns out to be the point. Directed by Fede Álvarez, the filmmaker behind Don’t Breathe, the show understands that what your imagination fills in is always scarier than what any screen can show you.

You can watch Calls on Apple TV.

Shining Girls (2022)

Kirby Mazrachi is a newspaper archivist at the Chicago Sun-Times trying to hold her life together after surviving a brutal assault. The problem is that her reality keeps changing around her. She comes home and suddenly owns a dog instead of a cat. She discovers she is married to a man she only remembers as a colleague. Her desk at work keeps moving. No one else notices except for Kirby.

Elisabeth Moss carries the whole thing on her back, and she is extraordinary, calibrating Kirby’s confidence and anxiety differently across each shifting version of reality. Jamie Bell is quietly terrifying as the villain. The show uses time travel not as a gimmick but as a way of showing how one person’s violence can create ripples, trapping its victims in a reality they cannot fully trust. It is slow to start and deliberately disorienting, which is entirely the point.

You can watch Shining Girls on Apple TV.

Microsoft’s next wave of Surface devices may have just leaked, and it looks like it is doubling down on choice.

Early retailer listings suggest the upcoming Surface Pro and Surface Laptop will once again be split between ARM and Intel models. There will also be more configurations than before.

On the consumer side, both devices are expected to run on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X2 chips. These include the X2 Plus and X2 Elite. For the Surface Laptop, that reportedly means sticking with the 13.8-inch model. It also involves dropping the larger 15-inch ARM variant altogether. Memory options are said to range from 16GB to 24GB RAM. These will be paired with 512GB to 1TB SSD storage.

Google Gemini is the most trusted AI platform among its competition, but many people still have concerns about the technology, according to an American Customer Satisfaction Index poll released Thursday.

In ACSI’s results, AI scored an overall customer satisfaction score of 73 on a scale of 0 to 100, which the authors noted was slightly below social media (74), airlines and mortgage lenders, but in line with energy utilities. 

Of the five platforms mentioned in the survey, Google Gemini led with 76, followed by Microsoft Copilot (74), Claude and ChatGPT (both 73), and Grok and Perplexity (both 71). Meanwhile, TikTok (77) and YouTube (78) both scored better than the AI platforms.

Gemini is one of the most prolific AI services, with access via smart speakers, TVs, phones and computers, while most ChatGPT users access the AI tool via the ChatGPT website or mobile app, and Grok via social media platform X.

The ACSI poll found that 43% of respondents said reduced human-to-human interaction is their main concern, followed by job loss for future generations (37%) and their own job risk (31%), based on interviews with 2,711 US adults.

Baby Boomers were the most skeptical generation in the poll, with 35% saying they are very concerned about AI’s effects, compared to just 6% who view it extremely favorably.

Disconnect between AI adoption and perception

While platforms such as ChatGPT have up to 1 billion weekly users, there is still a disconnect between AI’s adoption and public perception of it, which is driven by concerns over privacy, the spread of misinformation and the loss of jobs. 

“Consumers spent the last decade learning to distrust how social media platforms handle their data, and AI’s privacy scores suggest they’re carrying that skepticism forward,” said Forrest Morgeson, associate professor of marketing at Michigan State University and director of research emeritus at the ACSI.

21% reported an “extremely favorable” outlook toward AI, while an equal 21% said they are “very concerned about the consequences.” 

These results were in line with another poll published by YouGov this week, which found that only 29% think the positive effects of AI outweigh the negative ones, while 36% think its net effects are negative.

It’s worth noting that more than half of the people interviewed (56%) had no recent experience with AI, but of the 44% who did, half of them use AI at least once a day, and the usage went up with people who earned over $100,000 a year.

Last month, an NBC poll suggested that AI was one of the least-liked things in America, but it was still more popular than the Democratic Party.

This week, I went looking for some genuinely good underrated movies so you don’t have to. What I found is a solid trio that covers three different moods. One will make you sweat through a dinner party, one will make you paranoid about your neighbours, and one will make you want to adopt a ginger cat immediately. Best part? They are all free to watch movies on Tubi. So here are my picks for this weekend.

We also have guides to the best new movies to stream, the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best free movies, and the best movies on Amazon Prime Video.

The Invitation (2015)

The official synopsis of The Invitation sounds like a perfectly ordinary film – a man goes to a dinner party at his ex-wife’s house and something feels off. That’s it! That is the whole setup. And yet director Karyn Kusama turns that premise into a suffocating and anxiety-inducing movie.

The genius of it is that you are never quite sure whether the dread you feel is real or just grief wearing a sinister mask. Logan Marshall-Green carries the whole film on a knife’s edge, and the slow build is precisely calibrated so that by the time the third act arrives, your palms will be sweating. This underrated movie somehow flew under most people’s radar. You can watch it alone and then maybe decline any dinner invitations for a week.

You can watch The Invitation on Tubi

The Ones Below (2015)

This one is a British thriller that deserves far more attention than it ever got. It starts slowly with a young couple expecting their first child. They strike up a friendship with the new couple downstairs, who are also expecting. Then something happens, and the film begins to tilt in a creepy direction.

What makes The Ones Below so effective is how ordinary everything looks. Polished, calm, suburban. The horror creeps in through small gestures and loaded silences rather than jump scares or obvious manipulation. If you enjoy films that make you question people’s motives from the opening scene, this one is for you.

You can watch The Ones Below on Tubi.

A Street Cat Named Bob (2016)

After two thrillers, here is something that will repair your faith in people a little. A Street Cat Named Bob is based on the true story of James Bowen, a homeless busker and recovering drug addict living on the streets of London, whose life changed when he found an injured ginger cat and nursed him back to health. The cat, Bob, refused to leave. And so began one of the more unlikely and genuinely moving friendships you will see in a movie.

It would be easy to dismiss this as sentimental, and it does not shy away from sentiment. But it earns every moment of it. Luke Treadaway is excellent as James, and the real Bob the Cat plays himself, which is arguably one of the finest casting choices of the decade. It is the kind of film that doesn’t ask much of you except to pay attention, and rewards you quietly and completely.

You can watch A Street Cat Named Bob on Tubi.

Cooking food with fire is arguably the technology that propelled humans to become the dominant species on Earth. It’s pretty straightforward to achieve, just requiring a fuel source, a supply of oxygen from the air, and a way to initiate the reaction; then it self-sustains. You wouldn’t think there’s much to improve, but what about cooking with plasma? [Jay] from the plasma channel is no stranger here, and he thinks that there may be something in this idea, certainly enough to actually build something.

Now, let’s be straight with you, this isn’t a new concept, and you can buy a plasma-based cooking appliance right now. But they are all AC-powered devices. What if you want to go camping? [Jay] attempts (and succeeds) in building a portable, rechargeable 600W plasma cooking device that can actually cook food, but it was not all plain sailing.

The existing off-the-shelf ZVS driver modules available were a bit weak and unreliable, and the required flyback coils were hard to find with the right specs, so he needed to get down to work building custom parts. First off, the coils. Custom formers were resin-printed and machine-wound with 4000 turns of fine wire, and then resin-sealed into the former. [Jay] takes care to explain that it is crucial to get all the air out of the windings, or else local flashover breakdown will occur and wreck the coil in a short time. We reckon the resulting coils look amazing in their own right!

Next, the ZVS drivers on hand had low-quality capacitors (well, not enough capacitance anyway) and cheap driver transistors, so both were upgraded. The initial plan was to have four driver/coil pairs, each driving a single pair of electrodes, with a common ground ring connecting them all. It turns out this was a terrible idea: the drivers were not synchronised, so they were pulling on each other, causing catastrophic damage to the PCBs in a very short time. The solution was more complicated wiring, to give each coil secondary output a dedicated electrode pair, so there was no direct electrical connection between neighbouring coils and no coupling between them. A clever electrode arrangement meant that a pan would sit on top of a ring of electrodes, causing plasma discharges to jump directly to the pan, thereby concentrating localised heating there. We were wondering how this new direct connection (the pan is now a common connection!) didn’t also cause backfeeding and kill the ZVS drivers again, but it didn’t seem to happen.

Anyway, [Jay] demonstrates what is possibly the world’s first rechargeable, portable plasma cooker capable of making breakfast. Which we think is very important in its own right, however, we would like a plasma-based solution to making toast next, perhaps a plasma knife that cooks the bread as you slice it?

If this plasma cooking lark rings a bell, yes, we did touch upon this way back in 2017. And whilst not strictly plasma cooking, you can make an amazing microwave plasma in this ridiculously upgraded appliance. Definitely do not try that one at home.

Summary: Zoom has partnered with World, Sam Altman’s biometric identity company, to let meeting participants verify they are human using World’s Deep Face technology, which cross-references iris-scanned biometric profiles with live video to display a “Verified Human” badge. The feature responds to deepfake fraud that cost businesses over $200 million in Q1 2025 alone, including a $25 million loss at engineering firm Arup, though World’s iris-scanning Orb system faces ongoing regulatory action in Spain, Germany, the Philippines, and several other countries.

Zoom has partnered with World, the biometric identity company co-founded by Sam Altman, to let meeting participants prove they are real humans and not AI-generated deepfakes. The integration uses World’s Deep Face technology to cross-reference a participant’s live video feed against their iris-scanned biometric profile, and displays a “Verified Human” badge next to their name when the match succeeds. Hosts can enable a Deep Face waiting room that requires verification before anyone joins, and participants can request that someone verify themselves mid-call.

The feature addresses a threat that has moved from theoretical to expensive. In early 2024, engineering firm Arup lost $25 million after an employee in Hong Kong authorised a series of wire transfers during a video call in which every other participant turned out to be an AI-generated deepfake of his colleagues, including the company’s CFO. A similar attack hit a multinational firm in Singapore in 2025. Across the industry, deepfake-enabled fraud exceeded $200 million in losses in the first quarter of 2025 alone, and the average loss per corporate incident now tops $500,000.

How verification works

World’s Deep Face takes a three-pronged approach. It cross-references a signed image captured during the user’s original registration through World’s Orb device, a spherical biometric scanner that photographs iris patterns, with a real-time face scan from the user’s phone or computer and a live video frame visible to other meeting participants. Verification only succeeds when all three inputs match. The process runs locally on the participant’s device, and World says no personal data leaves the phone.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

This is architecturally different from the deepfake detection tools already available on Zoom’s marketplace. Products from Pindrop, Reality Defender, and Resemble AI analyse video frames for telltale signs of AI manipulation, flagging synthetic media in real time. Both Zoom and World said that because video generation models are improving rapidly, those frame-by-frame detection methods are becoming increasingly unreliable. Deep Face sidesteps the detection problem entirely by verifying the person’s identity against a biometric record rather than trying to determine whether the pixels on screen were generated by software.

The trade-off is that Deep Face requires participants to have a World ID, which means they must have visited one of World’s physical Orb devices to have their irises scanned. The network currently has around 18 million verified users across 160 countries and roughly 1,500 active Orbs. That is a small fraction of Zoom’s user base, which limits the feature’s immediate utility. For most meetings, the existing frame-analysis tools will remain the practical option. Deep Face is designed for high-stakes calls where identity certainty justifies the friction of requiring biometric pre-registration.

The business case

Zoom’s spokesperson Travis Isaman described the integration as part of the company’s “open ecosystem approach, giving customers more ways to build trust into their workflows based on what matters most for their use case.” The framing is deliberate. Zoom is not endorsing World ID as its default identity layer; it is offering it as one option among several in a marketplace that already includes multiple deepfake detection and identity verification tools.

For Zoom, the partnership is defensive. The company’s revenue reached $4.67 billion in fiscal 2025, growing at a modest 3%, and its strategic challenge is to remain the default platform for business communication as competitors add AI features across the board. Zoom has responded with AI avatars, an AI-powered office suite, and cross-application AI notetakers. Adding human verification addresses a different vector: making Zoom the platform that enterprises trust for sensitive conversations. In a market where a single deepfake call can cost $25 million, that trust has a measurable commercial value.

For World, the Zoom integration is a distribution win. The company, which rebranded from Worldcoin in 2024, has struggled to move beyond crypto-adjacent early adopters. Its partnerships with Visa, Tinder, Razer, and Coinbase have expanded the contexts in which a World ID is useful, but none of those integrations create the kind of immediate, visceral demand that a corporate security use case does. If a company’s treasury team requires World ID verification for any video call involving wire transfer authorisation, that creates institutional adoption that individual consumer partnerships do not.

The privacy question

World’s Orb-based identity system has faced sustained regulatory scrutiny. Spain’s data protection authority issued a formal warning in February 2026 citing GDPR violations and insufficient data protection assessments. Germany’s Bavarian data regulator ordered the deletion of iris data in December 2024. The Philippines issued a cease-and-desist order in October 2025 for obtaining consent through financial incentives. Investigations or suspensions have occurred in Argentina, Kenya, Hong Kong, and Indonesia.

The governance frameworks emerging around biometric AI in 2026, including the EU AI Act’s high-risk classification for biometric identification systems, add further complexity. World maintains that its zero-knowledge proof architecture means verification happens without exposing personal data, and that iris images are encrypted and stored only on the user’s device. Critics argue that the collection process itself, requiring a physical visit to an Orb to have your eyes scanned, creates risks that privacy-preserving cryptography does not fully address, particularly when recruitment has disproportionately targeted lower-income communities.

For enterprises evaluating the Zoom integration, the calculus is whether the security benefit of biometric human verification outweighs the regulatory and reputational risk of requiring employees or counterparties to register with a company that multiple data protection authorities have sanctioned. That calculation will differ by jurisdiction and by industry. A Wall Street trading desk conducting a $100 million deal over Zoom may decide the risk is worth it. A European public-sector organisation almost certainly will not.

What this means

The Zoom-World partnership is a marker of how far the deepfake threat has advanced. Two years ago, the Arup incident was treated as an extraordinary outlier. Today, deepfake-enabled fraud is a billion-dollar category, AI-generated video is sophisticated enough to defeat frame-analysis detection, and the question of whether the person on a video call is real has become a legitimate enterprise security concern.

The solution Zoom and World are proposing, biometric identity verification anchored to iris scans, works technically but introduces its own set of complications around privacy, regulatory compliance, and the barrier to adoption that physical Orb registration creates. It is a feature for specific, high-value use cases rather than a default setting for every Monday morning stand-up. But the fact that Zoom considers it worth integrating at all tells you something about where the technology landscape is heading: toward a future where proving you are human is no longer something you can take for granted, even when you are looking someone in the eye.