4 min read9 min

Last month, I made my first visit to Mongolia as Minister for the Indo-Pacific.

Advertisement

Our UK-Mongolia relationship is based on shared democratic values, with our governments, civil society, Parliamentarians and media working side by side to build a more secure and prosperous future for our nations and our people.

The world we face now is increasingly volatile, with global events shaping our lives – wherever we are. We must continue to build partnerships around the world to face our shared challenges together.

That’s why my visit was about translating partnership into practical results: securing opportunities for British business, strengthening economic security, and backing a partnership that has purpose and ambition for today and for tomorrow.

The UK was the first Western nation to establish diplomatic relations with Mongolia over sixty years ago, and that relationship has become ever more important in recent years. Mongolia’s economy is growing by 5–6 per cent a year, and the country is rich in the critical minerals on which the global economy increasingly depends. 

Advertisement

At the heart of my visit was the annual UK–Mongolia Political Dialogue, which I co‑chaired with Mongolia’s Deputy Foreign Minister. In Ulaanbaatar, this partnership is taking shape beneath the city streets. I discussed plans for the city’s first metro system – a transformative project that would cut congestion, reduce pollution and improve daily life for millions. British engineering expertise from projects like London’s Elizabeth Line is supporting those plans, backed by a strong UK Export Finance offer. If this project proceeds, it could generate significant export opportunities for the UK, supporting skilled jobs across our rail, engineering, and professional services sectors.

The benefits of partnership were also clear during my visit to the Gobi Desert, where I visited the Oyu Tolgoi copper mine, one of the largest in the world and operated by Rio Tinto, a British‑Australian company. With an ore body the size of Manhattan, the copper and other critical minerals extracted here are essential for everything from electric vehicles and renewable energy to data centres and the technologies that underpin modern life. At Oyu Tolgoi, UK linked investment is supporting communities and strengthening secure, sustainable supply chains the world depends on.

But our partnership is not only about minerals and megaprojects. Long‑term prosperity depends on people, skills, and opportunity. Working with UNICEF and Mongolia’s Ministry of Education, the UK is supporting Mongolia’s decision to make English its official second language through the provision of English‑language teaching, including in remote and nomadic communities. This partnership has already reached more than 147,000 young people, opening doors for the next generation of Mongolians. As one student said to me at our event with UNICEF, learning English “didn’t just teach her a language, it opened up a world of opportunity.”

Alongside this, the UK’s Chevening programme continues to support talented Mongolians to study in the UK, many of whom will go on to shape politics, business and civil society back in their own country in the years ahead. These alumni links are a powerful investment in future prosperity – strengthening long‑term ties that benefit both our nations.  

Advertisement

On my visit I also saw the importance of women’s leadership and civil society to economic success. I met female parliamentarians, business leaders and journalists, and supported UK‑backed work examining the barriers women face in public life. Inclusive economies are stronger economies. Women own two thirds of small and medium sized businesses in Mongolia and are represented at senior levels across heavy industry sectors too. Our tour of the Oyu Tolgoi mine was led by women engineers, and the driver of the “road train” – the long underground lorry, was a young woman.

Maintaining traditional sectors is important alongside new development. In the South Gobi, I also met with a herder family and saw first-hand Mongolia’s nomadic traditions. The family we met owned 100 camels and hundreds of livestock, while their sons have taken up opportunities as engineers at the mine and continue to support their parents as they can. It was a reminder that sustainable growth must work for communities as well as markets – and that responsible investment is essential to long‑term stability. 

Together the UK and Mongolia are investing in the future – in the next generation, in shared opportunity and in a partnership that will deliver in the decades to come.

Source link

4 min read8 min

The government turned down private sector experts being seconded to Whitehall to help create a new targeted energy bill support scheme. 

Advertisement

PoliticsHome understands that departments were in talks with the energy sector about data analysts being seconded to the civil service to help design a scheme in response to the Iran war, but decided against it. 

The revelation comes amid questions over whether the government has the data it needs to build a scheme that ensures financial support reaches households who need it most amid the global energy crisis triggered by the Middle East conflict, without spending huge amounts of public money. 

Ministers have said that any new support for household energy bills will be targeted and not a repeat of the universal scheme rolled out by the then-Conservative government in 2022, when Russia’s invasion of Ukraine put extreme pressure on global energy supplies.

Earlier this month, Chancellor Rachel Reeves told the BBC: “I want to learn the lessons of the past because when Russia invaded Ukraine, the richest, the best-off third of households got more than a third of the support. That makes no sense at all.” 

Advertisement

Speaking to MPs last month, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was “acutely aware” of how much that policy cost the taxpayer and “acutely aware of the state of the public finances”. The 2022 energy bill package is estimated to have cost the Treasury around £50bn.

The government has already announced support for households reliant on heating oil, and has said it will set out a wider package of help for energy bills in the months ahead.

The Ofgem price cap, which determines the maximum amount that suppliers can charge people for household energy, is expected to rise significantly in July as a result of the pressure put on global supplies of gas and oil by the ongoing war in Iran. Consultancy Cornwall Insight currently forecasts that it will rise 19 per cent from £1,641 to £⁠1,929.

Advertisement

PoliticsHome understands that in recent weeks, parts of the energy industry have offered to assist officials by providing fully-funded staff on secondment to help develop targeted energy bill support. However, despite initially being open to the proposal, the government turned it down, concluding that the additional support is unnecessary.

As the government comes under pressure to set out details about how further support will work, there is growing doubt about whether the mechanism it needs to effectively deliver targeted support currently exists in Whitehall.

Adam Bell, a former government energy special adviser and director of policy at Stonehaven Consultancy, told PoliticsHome it was “just obscene” that a mechanism to target energy bill support had not already been created following the 2022 energy crisis. 

“The crisis was four years ago. We have failed to act in time for the next crisis, which is just obscene,” said Bell. “It’s not like they weren’t told over and over again.”

Advertisement

He also said it was “depressing” that the offer of staff had been rejected, stating that a lot of data work to target energy bill support “has already been done” by the private sector, while the government remains “slow and unable” to do the same. 

Simon Francis, co-ordinator at the End Fuel Poverty coalition, said it was “disappointing” that the government had rejected the offer of external support as it “clearly” does need it.

“It’s something certainly ministers have realised, if they hadn’t already realised it in the last couple of months, that there needs to be a lot more work done at speed to get those systems in place,” he told PoliticsHome.

He said that basing support on means-tested benefits is an inadequate approach, as it will result in other people who need protection from rising energy bills being excluded.

Advertisement

“Energy firms themselves understand and know who is struggling. They know their customer base, they know who’s on priority service registers,” Francis said, adding that the government should be looking to “break down those blocks between sharing of information”. 

A government spokesperson told PoliticsHome: “We are working at pace to explore options to deliver targeted energy bill support and are in regular contact with the energy sector.

“Internal government resource was found to begin this work quickly, and we will continue to work with both public sector bodies and industry to draw on the right expertise as needed.”

 

Advertisement

Source link

Israel has violated the ceasefire in Lebanon 220 times in less than three days, murdering three people and wounding seven, including four paramedics.

220 Ceasefire Violations by Israel in Lebanon in 3 days

Since the ceasefire went into effect on 17 April until 19 April (noon), Israel has committed 220 violations in Lebanon, according to the Lebanese National Center for Scientific Research and National Center for Natural… pic.twitter.com/rTjdwouoMV

— Legal Agenda (@Legal_Agenda) April 21, 2026

Since the ceasefire came into effect at midnight on 16 April until midday on 19 April, Israel performed 50 illegal mining and bombing operations, 52 artillery shelling operations, seven raids and airstrikes, 30 aerial violations, and four phosphorus or sonic flares. All of these were in direct contravention of the ceasefire.

Israeli occupation forces carry out detonations in several villages in South Lebanon, breaching the ceasefire agreement. pic.twitter.com/0C4MP5xfUp

— PALESTINE ONLINE (@OnlinePalEng) April 22, 2026

Just two hours after the ceasefire came into effect, Israel bombed Nabatieh, the al-Abbassiya intersection north of Tyre, Haris, and the city of Tyre itself several times.

JUST IN : Israel Breaks Ceasefire in Lebanon in Less Than 2 Hours

More than 7 violations recorded in under an hour. Airstrikes hit Nabatieh, the al-Abbassiya intersection north of Tyre, Haris, and Tyre itself MULTIPLE times.

Israel also warned the Lebanese military and… https://t.co/L7N5cvJDqT pic.twitter.com/OdVv3vBxvO

— Ryan Rozbiani (@RyanRozbiani) April 16, 2026

Advertisement

The violations have continued with Israel blowing up civilian areas in Deir Siryan and Houla.

Israel Continues Carry Out Massive Detonations & Air Strikes In South Lebanon

One of the latest ceasefire violations occurred in the Deir Siryan area. pic.twitter.com/gWCoLxTe5x

— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) April 20, 2026

Israeli attack on the town of Houla. pic.twitter.com/GwabTmmtD6

— courtneybonneauimages (@cbonneauimages) April 22, 2026

Advertisement

What happened to international law?

Even without the ceasefire, all of these attacks are direct contraventions of international humanitarian law. Lebanon is a sovereign nation and Israel’s illegal attacks are nothing short of ethnic cleansing.

Israel may claim to be ‘defeating terrorists’ and ‘disarming Hezbollah’, but as the Canary has reported multiple times, Hezbollah would not actually exist if Israel had not invaded Lebanon in 1982.

Additionally, armed resistance is not illegal under international law. A United Nations General Assembly resolution states:

The General Assembly,

Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;

Advertisement

In December last year, the Canary’s Mohamad Kleit wrote:

I saw nothing but rubble. Destroyed houses, lost dreams, and graffiti in Hebrew promising an Israeli return to take over the border towns. This statement on the wall was accompanied by other racist, colonial slurs against Lebanon, drawn on what remained of houses and shops, by the Israeli occupation forces during the 2024 war.

What this makes abundantly clear is that the attacks on Lebanon are not some new attempt to disarm Hezbollah. They are part of a prolonged and systematic colonial attempt to invade the land.

Israel has a track record of ignoring ceasefires

Since October 2025 alone, Israel has committed 2,492 violations of the Gaza ceasefire, which equates to an average of 13 violations per day.

Israel has murdered 775 Palestinians, including 207 children, 86 women, and 21 elderly people. It has also wounded 2,171 people, more than half of whom were children, women or elderly.

Additionally, Israel is still holding about 34 square-kilometres beyond the agreed withdrawal lines. It has also blocked repairs to electricity, water and sewage infrastructure.

According to Drop Site News, only 228 aid trucks per day are entering Gaza, compared to the 600 that were agreed. Gaza is then receiving only 38% of the agreed humanitarian aid. Similarly, it is receiving only 14.8% of the required fuel deliveries.

Where’s the media coverage?

Of course, the majority of the Western media are ignoring Israel’s ceasefire violations in both Gaza and Lebanon.

Under the cover of a “ceasefire,” Israel continues daily attacks on Lebanese towns and cities with deadly consequences for civilians. https://t.co/afw9CTqnLW

— Occupation Movie (@OccupationMovie) April 21, 2026

Advertisement

Similarly, and unsurprisingly, the US is also ignoring Israel’s violations.

Israel, like it’s sugar daddy, the United States, basically just ignores the international rule of law. They make a million promises and they break a million promises. They are a criminal rogue state. https://t.co/HwjTa9miSj

— Walter J. Black (@captain_stavros) April 21, 2026

Therefore, Israel will continue to get away with murdering innocent people and destroying civilian infrastructure. 

A ceasefire by Israel is not a real ceasefire. Israel still keeps bombing and killing innocents.

The world needs to take actions to demand that Israel stop. This is a violation. This are war crimes. https://t.co/fpbvIs7m7s

Advertisement

— #ProRakyatFreePalestine (@reviewstuffs) April 22, 2026

When Hezbollah launches rockets towards Israel, Western media parrot IOF lines, calling it a “blatant violation of the ceasefire”. Of course, Hezbollah was aiming at Israeli soldiers while the IOF blows up homes, schools, and hospitals.

Meanwhile, the whole world turns the other way while Israel — a rogue terrorist state — repeatedly violates every ceasefire it has ever signed, murdering innocent innocent people in the process.

Feature image via NBC News/ YouTube

By The Canary

Source link

This week the Combat Antisemitism Movement posted about a dark Hangman poster inside tube carriages on the London underground.

We agree that it’s “twisted”, but it’s twisted because it’s true.

London Underground, April 18, 2026: “Hangman” advertisements in paid public space on a London Underground train use twisted accusations against Israel. pic.twitter.com/4Ua7ZSejQ8

— Combat Antisemitism Movement (@CombatASemitism) April 20, 2026

Advertisement

Zionist Israel passed a law to hang Palestinians

This is the advert in full:

Author and rancid Israel apologist, David Deutsch, responded as follows:

The Advertising Standards Authority requires that all advertisements in the UK be “legal, decent, honest and truthful”. This one is only legal.

We agree it’s not decent but fuck decency. Israel is exterminating human beings for the crime of their birth.

At the same time, we disagree that it’s dishonest as Maddison Wheeldon wrote for the Canary:

Fascist Israel minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has pushed through a law in the Knesset which will authorise the death penalty – by hanging – of Palestinians. Specifically, this law will apply by default to Palestinians who have been tried in military court and found guilty of committing a fatal attack.

She added:

These sentences would be imposed following convictions in Israeli military courts, where authorities often pursue charges that would not constitute crimes under international humanitarian law.

Denied proper access to legal counsel and basic procedural rights, defendants face proceedings that amount to little more than sham trials designed to legitimise killing.

Horrifyingly, there are currently 9,300 Palestinians in Israeli detention, whose fates will now hang in the balance – either left to suffer and languish in prison, or face the noose.

Advertisement

Ben-Gvir and other politicians wore noose pins on their suits to demonstrate their support for this policy of extermination. After passing the law, they celebrated with champagne.

Israel's NS Minister Ben Gvir pops champagne to celebrate Knesset's passage of a death penalty law for Palestinian detainees. He and his party members wore golden noose-shaped pins.

"Soon we will get them one by one."

Netanyahu, who almost never votes, also came in to say… pic.twitter.com/VLXRd1nwcz

Advertisement

— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) March 31, 2026

Others celebrated in fancy dress.

Combating antisemitism ≠ shielding Israel from (very) legitimate criticism.

Here is deputy speaker of the Knesset dressing up as the law referred to in that image: pic.twitter.com/Bxya23Sefj

Advertisement

— Smooch (@Isa_Smooch) April 22, 2026

If you’re unfamiliar with all this, you may not believe what you’re looking at. However, this is how Israel and its defenders have gotten away with it for so long. Their crimes are literally so depraved that people can’t believe they’re true.

Dilly Hussain, deputy editor of the news platform 5 Pillars, had this to say:

Stating facts = “Antisemitism”

Humanity cannot hate Israel and Zionists enough.

Advertisement

— Dilly Hussain (@DillyHussain88) April 20, 2026

The truth hurts

Sometimes, the truth is indecent. But maybe the easily offended should be appalled by Israel’s barbarism and not by the people pointing it out.

In the meantime, we advise that people like Deutsch make a complaint to the Advertising Standards Agency. They may not get anywhere with it, but it will draw more attention to Israel’s ongoing genocide.

Featured image via X/ Combat Antisemitism Movement

By Willem Moore

Source link

3 min read12 min

Andy Burnham is set to campaign in London ahead of the local elections as Labour tries to avoid major losses in the capital.

Advertisement

The Mayor of Greater Manchester, widely seen as a leading candidate to succeed Keir Starmer as leader, is planning to knock on doors in Islington in north London this week, according to literature seen by PoliticsHome, and is expected to visit several more boroughs between now and 7 May.

The capital is one of Labour’s biggest headaches heading into those elections next month, with the party under pressure from the Greens to its left and Reform UK to its right.

A YouGov poll published on Wednesday forecast Labour to win 15 borough councils, down six from the last time they held elections in 2022. The biggest beneficiary of Labour’s fall in support is expected to be the Greens, with YouGov projecting Zack Polanski’s party to win in Hackney, Lambeth, Lewisham and Waltham Forest. 

In Islington, where Burnham is due to campaign in the coming days, the Greens are expected to eat into Labour’s vote share and finish second (37 to 31 per cent), according to YouGov.

Advertisement

The former cabinet minister is also planning to visit the borough of Lewisham in south London, PoliticsHome understands, where YouGov today gave the Greens a narrow two per cent lead over Labour (35 to 33 per cent). Bar a brief interlude in 2006 when it was under no overcall control, Labour has controlled Lewisham for nearly 60 years.

Burnham wanted to be Labour’s candidate in the Gorton and Denton by-election earlier this year but was blocked by the Prime Minister and other senior Labour officials.

Green candidate Hannah Spencer won the contest in Greater Manchester with 40 per cent of the vote, pushing Labour into third place. Many Labour figures believe the party would have kept hold of the seat had Burnham been the candidate.

Advertisement

The House magazine reported earlier this month that the Burnham operation had started reaching out to Labour MPs, senior party officials and trade unions about a second attempt to return to the House of Commons.

Karl Turner, the Yorkshire MP who recently had the Labour whip removed, predicted on last week’s episode of PoliticsHome podcast The Rundown that Burnham would be Labour leader and prime minister “in the not too distant future”.

The consensus within Labour is that Burnham would be in competition with former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner to secure the support of the left and soft left of the party in any future leadership contest.

Starmer’s position is coming under renewed pressure over further revelations about his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to the US.

Advertisement

Olly Robbins, who was sacked by the Prime Minister as the most senior civil servant in the Foreign Office last week over his role in the Mandelson affair, told MPs on Tuesday that No 10 showed a “dismissive attitude” to Labour peer’s security vetting.

Starmer has repeatedly apologised for the original decision to appoint Mandelson, but insists that due process was properly followed throughout the process.

Told to resign by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch on Wednesday, Starmer said: “I was elected by the British people because they [the Tories] let the country down for 14 long years.

“Whatever she says, whatever noise they make, nothing is to distract me from delivering for our country.”

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Source link

Keir Starmer faced many disgruntled MPs during Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) as he continued to deny any responsibility for his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson.

However, despite making jabs at Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, for “rushing to judgement” on the government’s processes and of MPs’ knowledge of Mandelson’s murky ties, Starmer once again highlighted his own woeful lack of judgement.

The prime minister keeps trying to shift the blame. Speaking in PMQs on 22 April, he claimed Olly Robbins made a “serious error of judgement” by failing to inform him that the security vetting advised against clearance and red-flagged the appointment as “high concern”.

Nevertheless, most people would be able to make an objective judgement that a man sitting on the board of Kremlin-linked defence company, Systema, is pretty damn dodgy. A position, as Badenoch underscored, Mandelson sat on “long after the first invasion of Ukraine in 2014”.

Badenoch subsequently destroyed Starmer’s measly defences by highlighting how the former ambassador sat on this board as a non-executive director, likely to his own profit, “long after” Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine in 2014.

Apparently, Starmer needed that in a paint-by-numbers explanation that this clearly is a conflict of interest to have an appointed official likely drawing profits from war crimes against a supposed ally, Ukraine.

Mandelson is in the inner circle of the Trilateral-Epstein elite who run the global economy like a protection racket. The normal rules don’t apply to him. Funny though watching ‘Mr Rules’ squirming to explain away having being rumbled. https://t.co/iujGiljyss

— Hon. PolProf of Agile Ceremonies (@CeilNoyle) April 17, 2026

Advertisement

PMQs: All allegations put to bed by Robbins’ evidence

True to form, Keir Starmer tried to scapegoat Olly Robbins, stating the allegations were “put to bed” by his sacking. Robbins has been apportioned full blame by the Labour government, for any and all misjudgment surrounding the appointment of Epstein pal, Petie Mandelson. 

On the other hand, Starmer has only exposed his own poor judgment as our elected leader. Given his past as former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, this is frankly embarrassing for any elected official, let alone the PM.

After all, most Britons would surely expect their PM to be capable of making objective decisions without needing officials to spell out the blatantly obvious.

Getting his just desserts, Starmer has delivered another own goal for this failing, occupied government.

Israel is also at work in our corridors of power

On top of that, the rest of us can also clearly see the pro-Israel influences at play in the government’s decisions, which only adds to the urgency for the PM to resign his position. Power and privilege should depend on competence — not, as Badenoch outlined, on the current standard being defended.

She said:

He promised them probity, and what he has given them is cronyism and an old boys’ club where Matthew Doyle is being proposed as an ambassador. Ridiculous.

This is referring to yet another example of the power afforded by Starmer to pro-Israel stooges with more paedo-ties. Doyle campaigned for convicted sex offender, Sean Morton.

This week, the Canary wrote about the nefarious influence of Zionists on our elected officials:

…significant donations from Israeli lobby groups to MPs and political parties appear to buy political allegiance and diplomatic cover for Israel. This is only evidenced by the International Criminal Court (ICC) warrants outstanding for senior leaders in Israel for genocide and war crimes.

Warrants which the UK has repeatedly violated, welcoming war criminals to our shores. In fact, David Cameron even threatened ICC prosecutor Karim Khan to block warrants in the first place.

This development provides further evidence that our so-called democratic process faces repeated undermining by a colonialist and violent Zionist project.

People are absolutely sick of dishonesty in British politics as Zarah Sultana has strongly condemned.

As I said yesterday: Keir Starmer is a barefaced liar. https://t.co/FDpQnGCvHy

— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) April 21, 2026

The PM’s future is no longer tenable

It is deeply uncomfortable to find resonance and legitimacy in the judgement of the leader of the Conservatives. Nonetheless, this just makes clear how far Labour has sunk into the morally bankrupt abyss. Moreover, it signifies just how far the party has shifted to the far-right.

Most people across the country can see the prime minister repeatedly lying to hold on to power and privilege. Actions like Sultana’s intervention in the Commons the other night — when she refused to back down from calling Keir Starmer a liar — further drive that message home to the electorate.

Badenoch is also managing to annihilate Starmer’s defence, which can only confirm that the PM’s future as leader is just no longer tenable. Frankly, it hasn’t been for quite a few years.

Therefore, MPs must apply sustained pressure now and make it clear that the public is done with excuses.

Instead, unfortunately for Labour, voters actually want to trust their elected officials and the power and influence they wield.

Featured image via the Canary

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

The post Tobacco and Vapes Bill: the stupidest law ever passed in Britain appeared first on spiked.

Source link

With local elections just over two weeks away, Labour fear a wipeout in the nation’s capital. With the Morgan McSweeney, Matthew Doyle, and Peter Mandelson scandals swirling overhead, things cannot get much worse for Keir Starmer’s ailing project. But there is always another scandal with this Labour government: the number of Zionists in its ranks. Could they be wiped out at the local elections as well?

London Labour’s ‘friends’ of Israel

London Labour’s executive committee includes Izzy Lenga. In a now-deleted photo from her Facebook page, Lenga is pictured in a military uniform, wrapped in an Israeli flag and carrying an assault rifle. Photographs of recruits in similar outfits suggest that Lenga may have taken part in Marva, a two-month ‘IDF intro’ course.

Izzy Lenga is an associate of fellow Labour councillor Ella Rose. In 2016, after being made director of the Jewish Labour Movement, Rose attempted to conceal a previous job at the Israeli embassy in London. Rose also admitted to an undercover reporter to “working with” Israeli embassy officer Shai Masot.

London Labour councillor Ella Rose has previously been caught boasting about participating in IDF-developed Krav Maga. In 2022, now Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood campaigned for Ella Rose and Liron Velleman, Labour’s two candidates for Barnet Council. In March, Velleman was sentenced for child sex offences.

Israeli embassy employee and former IDF officer Shai Masot was also recorded in the covert investigation, discussing the potential “taking down” of Alan Duncan, a Conservative government minister at the time. Boris Johnson, then Foreign Secretary, told Parliament that Masot’s “cover” had been “well and truly blown.”

Jewish Labour Movement

London Labour’s executive committee also includes Mike Katz, former national chair, and Peter Mason, former national secretary of the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM). The JLM specifies that it aims “to promote the centrality of Israel in Jewish life”. Another former JLM chair is Ivor Caplin, the ex-Labour MP and Defence Minister, who was arrested over alleged sexual communication with a child last January.

At JLM’s 2024 conference, former Unit 8200 spy Assaf Kaplan spoke alongside now disgraced Labour MP Josh Simons at an event on “how to run a good campaign”. Simons hired private investigators to go after journalists who were exposing Morgan McSweeney and Labour Together.

Another member of London Labour’s executive committee is Issy Waite, a member of the Jewish Labour Movement and Labour First employee. Morgan McSweeney’s ally Matt Pound was previously head of Labour First, tasked with ensuring the success of McSweeney’s favoured candidates.

Shama Tatler and Anu Prasher also sit on the executive committee. One Labour source spoke to me about being dragged before a three-person ‘panel’ of Tatler, Prasher, and Luke Akehurst, and current London councillors have told me that the party is deliberately “sabotaging” popular candidates.

Labour MP Luke Akehurst has described Morgan McSweeney as a “pivotal figure” and “solid supporter of Israel”. McSweeney previously spent time living in Sarid, an Israeli colony. Ex-IDF officer Shai Masot called Akehurst as “a great friend” and “one of the best … on the inside of the party”.

Zionist Donors

In a 2014 X post, another London Labour executive committee member, Dean Gilligan, wrote:

Aha , now I understand, Conservative Friends of Israel donated £1417 #greed #hypocrisy #nastyparty #selfinterest #HarrowEast Tory MP.

Labour Friends of Israel have consistently refused to reveal its donors.

Reeves gave the keynote speech at Labour Friends of Israel’s annual lunch. She has received donations from three Labour Together funders: David Sainsbury, Clive Hollick, and Trevor Chinn. She was also bankrolled by Labour Together directly. Last week, I broke the news that current Labour Together board member Jonathan Kestenbaum served in the Israeli occupation forces.

Rachel Reeves also received £150k for “staffing costs” from lobbyist Victor Blank, who has funded three groups linked to the Israeli military. According to journalist Peter Oborne, Blank has supported both the Labour and Conservative Friends of Israel lobby groups, which “work closely” with the Israeli embassy.

I have spoken to two west London councillors who believe that Labour are on the verge of a “wipeout” in the capital. Speaking on condition of anonymity, one told me that voters on the doorstep are calling Starmer’s party “worse than the Tories”.

‘The seediest parts of Labour’

In an exclusive interview, another west London councillor told me that “the seediest parts of Labour are now running the party”. She said that Labour’s leadership would “sacrifice their own party for the McSweeney-Starmer wing”, before adding:

Labour will end up with nothing in London.

Labour’s London branch seem hellbent on attacking their rivals, but they might want to focus on cleaning up their own shop first.

Jody McIntyre is an investigative journalist whose work can be found at jodymcintyre.substack.com. He stood at the 2024 UK general election, receiving over 10,000 votes.

Featured image via the Canary

By Jody McIntyre

Source link

Killing Corbynism, by Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt, examines an issue largely absent from mainstream discussion of the Corbyn years. Namely, the role of the State of Israel and its lobby in the campaign to undermine supporters of Palestine and Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership of the opposition.

The book draws on extensive research. It demonstrates that a campaign against the left was developed in Jerusalem and exported to the UK when Corbyn was elected Labour leader.

For more than four years, a smear campaign discredited and demeaned Corbyn and his supporters. The campaign destabilised a political project that had given hope to millions. This paved the way for a lack of mainstream UK political opposition to Israel’s actions in Gaza and West Asia more widely.

Killing Corbynism provides both a compelling narrative and a meticulous repository of evidence, much of which has since been deleted. It goes to the heart of the UK Establishment, into both houses of parliament, the charitable sector, the media and the honours system.

Gordon-Nesbitt’s anti-racist analysis examines the Islamophobia, anti-Arab and anti-GRT racism, and even antisemitism, inherent within the campaign against Corbynism.

Published by Incarnadine, Killing Corbynism will be available in hardback, paperback and eBook editions from 24 April 2026.

Praise for ‘Killing Corbynism’

Ghada Karmi:

A welcome exposé of the pro-Israel dirty tricks campaign used to bring down Jeremy Corbyn. ‘Killing Corbynism’ is an informed, well-researched guide to the workings of a political network of malign influence that should alarm us all.

Leah Levane

In 2017 Jewish Voice for Labour was set up to try to counter the false allegations of anti-Semitism levelled against Jeremy Corbyn and all of us who supported his ideas.

One of our ongoing tasks has been to separate Judaism and Zionism and to emphasise that the majority of Zionists are not Jewish and that a significant – and growing – proportion of Jews are non- or anti-Zionist.

Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt’s clarity on this is all-too rare. She also recognises, as we do, that using anti-Semitism to mean criticism of the Israeli State or Zionism as an ideology is dangerous, not least for Jews in the face of very real anti-Jewish hatred.

That this tactic is still being used to attack – and suppress the freedoms of – hundreds of millions across the world who support the rights of the Palestinian people is another reason this book is so important.

Rebecca’s meticulous research reveals the methodology used by those who want to keep our society working in the interests of the few and helps give us the tools we need going forwards.

Advertisement

Ken Loach:

This book must be taken seriously as an analysis of how the claims of anti-Semitism in Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party got such a grip on the political discourse.

So many people were wrongly accused, so many accusations were exposed as unfounded, so many statements misquoted yet allowed to stand uncorrected and so many Jewish Labour members suspended or expelled for racism against Jews.

It was a witch-hunt, without question. Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt’s rigorous analysis is compulsory reading for anyone who wants to understand what actually happened to remove Jeremy Corbyn and the politics he represented from the Labour Party.

It has been called a ‘political assassination’. This book should ensure that it never happens again.

Advertisement

Moshé Machover:

The true nature of the Zionist project of colonisation – employing apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide against the Palestinian people – is increasingly grasped by the public. Support of Palestinian rights has become the defining position of present-day progressive opinion.

The forces of reaction have been trying hard to stem the tide by deploying fabricated accusations of ‘anti-Semitism’. This book is a forensic case study of one of the major campaigns against the left, using this poisoned weapon.

Michael Mansfield KC:

This courageous research exposes the extent of pernicious anti-democratic forces which have been spreading a toxic and false narrative for many years.

Ilan Pappé:

In a world of low-calibre self-centred politicians, focused on their career as an occupation and not a vocation, Jeremy Corbyn shone as the absolute antidote to what is wrong with politics in our time.

The smear campaign against him, based on the false allegation of anti-Semitism, should not have surprised anyone. His potential success would have led to politics that would challenge greedy capitalist stakeholders, who benefit from a world scorched by fires of war and global warming.

His success could have also led Europe for the first time to play a constructive role in protecting the Palestinians from further colonisation and dispossession.

‘Killing Corbynism’ provides the most detailed, authoritative analysis of how a pro-Israeli lobby played a crucial role in trying to topple Britain’s most honest living politician of our time.

This essential book will help us to be better prepared in the future as this could happen again to the few individuals who entered politics in order to make the world, including in Palestine, a better place through moral clarity and ethical strategy.

Advertisement

Yanis Varoufakis:

The brilliant tactics with which the Zionist lobby orchestrated Jeremy Corbyn’s character assassination is a master class in how vacuous accusations of anti-Semitism can be weaponised to safeguard capital’s hegemony.

A book that must be read by anyone interested in restoring the possibility of democracy in Britain and beyond.

Asa Winstanley:

Fascinating. A worthy successor to my book ‘Weaponising Anti-Semitism’, Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt’s ‘Killing Corbynism’ contains many essential details of this story which I’d not known.

Featured image via Incarnadine 

By The Canary

Source link

The UK has been named as the worst violator of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in the Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor 2026, a report by Norwegian People’s Aid (NPA).

Its ranking as the worst state in terms of “non-compatibility” with the treaty is, in part, due to the UK having its own nuclear weapons, as well as being understood to have started hosting nukes for Trump’s USA.

A damning report

The report explained why it focuses on the TPNW:

It tracks progress towards a world without nuclear weapons and highlights activities that stand between the international community and the fulfilment of the long-standing goal of the elimination of nuclear weapons.

In measuring this progress, the Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor uses the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) as the primary yardstick, because this treaty codifies norms and actions that are needed to create and maintain a world free of nuclear weapons.

Advertisement

The TPNW is the only legally binding global treaty that outlaws nuclear weapons. It was adopted on 7 July 2017 and entered into force on 22 January 2021. The impact of the TPNW will be built gradually and will depend on how it is welcomed and used by each and every State.

The TPNW is supported by 99 of the world’s 197 states, with 74 joining as parties and 25 as signatories that have not yet ratified the treaty.

Political pressure

No nuclear-armed states have joined the treaty, but the Ban Monitor said:

Every non-nuclear-armed State that joins strengthens political pressure for nuclear disarmament.

Adding:

With ratification processes advancing in several signatory States, further progress in expansion of the treaty membership appears likely in 2026.

The report took aim at the poor record of European states on eliminating nuclear weapons, saying “support for the TPNW is strong across all regions of the world except Europe,” and warned:

Europe stands out as a major obstacle to further progress toward universalisation of the TPNW.

The UK was singled out as having the most policies or practices in 2025 that were viewed by the report’s authors as being “non-compatible with, or of concern in relation to, one or more of the TPNW’s prohibitions”.

It was singled out alongside 44 other states found to have non-compatibilities with the TPNW. Most were not compatible with the TPNW’s “Prohibition on assisting, encouraging or inducing prohibited activity”.

The UK, meanwhile, was identified as being non-compatible with a total of six prohibitions:

1. on “development, production, manufacture, or other acquisition”;
2. on “possession or stockpiling”; on “receiving transfer or control”;
3. on “assisting; encouraging or inducing prohibited activity”;
4. on “seeking or receiving assistance to engage in prohibited activity”;
5. and on “allowing stationing, installation or deployment” of nuclear weapons.

The next least compatible country was the US, which had five prohibitions it was not compatible with.

‘Evidence suggests’ UK received US nukes and is expanding its own stockpile

ICAN head of communications Alistair Burnett told the Canary:

The Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor reports annually on the size and composition of the arsenals of the world’s nine nuclear-armed countries and it also assesses how compatible each country is with the provisions of the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

Of the nine nuclear-armed states, Britain violates more articles of the treaty than any other because it not only has its own nuclear weapons, it may have also started hosting US nuclear weapons on its soil again after a break of 18 years.

In 2008, US nuclear weapons that were held at US air bases in Britain were quietly withdrawn, but last year evidence suggests the US may have returned upgraded nuclear bombs (the B61-12) to RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk.

Neither country shares any information publicly on this, but research by the Federation of American Scientists revealed new facilities to store these weapons were being built at Lakenheath and flights by the US planes that ferry nuclear weapons around the world have been monitored arriving there.

Advertisement

The United Kingdom also engages in assistance and encouragement of banned nuclear activities under the TPNW in its nuclear cooperation with France, and the United States.

In 2021, the UK also removed the cap on the number of warheads it has and stopped releasing information on nuclear warhead numbers.

UK faces becoming ‘more and more isolated diplomatically’

Burnett went on to explain how the UK’s failure to support the TPNW is likely to make it increasingly diplomatically isolated, and recommended how the government could work towards a nuclear weapons-free future.

He said:

The TPNW came into force in 2021 and a majority of the world’s states have already either signed or ratified the treaty (74 have ratified and a further 25 have signed it and are working on ratification). As more and more countries join it, Britain and the other nuclear-armed countries become more and more isolated diplomatically

The TPNW provides a fair and verifiable pathway to eliminating nuclear weapons, and Britain – which committed to getting rid of its weapons when it joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968 – should engage with the TPNW and work towards joining that treaty as well in order to fulfil the disarmament commitments it has made and also to help reduce the nuclear threat that continues to menace the whole world.

It is impossible to envisage any use of nuclear weapons in conflict that would be consistent with international law, of which the British Government claims to be a champion.

A first step would be for the UK to stop voting against annual UN General Assembly resolutions on the TPNW and the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons. In 2024, the UK, alone with Russia and France, even voted against setting up an independent scientific panel to update our understanding of the impact of the use of nuclear weapons in 2024.

In addition this year, the UK Government, at a minimum, should also observe the first Review Conference of the TPNW that is being held at the UN in New York in late November and early December.

Advertisement

The Canary approached the Ministry of Defence (MOD) for comment on the government’s shaming in the report. An MOD spokesperson deferred to the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). The FCDO did not respond to a request for comment.

UK Government urged to end its ‘nuclear hypocrisy’ and engage with TPNW

The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) general secretary Sophie Bolt told the Canary:

It’s little surprise Britain is the worst violator of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons for 2026. It’s ploughing ahead with the multi-billion pound modernisation of its nuclear-armed submarines, update and expansion of its nuclear warhead stockpile, hosting of US nuclear weapons on British soil, and giving the RAF a nuclear role for the first time since the end of the Cold War.

The Canary reported earlier in April that campaigners were demanding that the UK stops hosting Trump’s nuclear weapons, in response to his veiled threat to use nuclear weapons against Iran.

Bolt continued:

As the government is facing increased pressure to enforce more austerity to fund major military spending hikes, a quarter of the MoD’s budget is blown on nuclear weapons.

What’s more, these nuclear projects are facing delays and ballooning costs with diminishing oversight. Nuclear dangers have never been higher but having nuclear weapons doesn’t increase security. Britain needs to end the nuclear hypocrisy and finally engage with the TPNW.

Nuclear deterrence is ‘naïve idealism’ – professor

University of Sussex emeritus professor Andy Stirling reacted to the report by telling the Canary:

Recent events show more than ever, that notions of ‘nuclear deterrence’ are a delusion that only lasts so long. Now more than ever, time is running out.

As with the same claims made in the past for explosives, machine guns and aircraft, nuclear weapons are not – and never can be – technologies to end war. Nuclear deterrence is naïve idealism.

With impacts of global war now more existential than ever, the security of each country must be viewed with reason, not sentimental nationalist blinkers or militaristic ideology.

Advertisement

Even where only a few countries claim exclusive national rights to make nuclear threats against others, the inevitable result will be nuclear war.

The only rational way to reduce the threat of nuclear war is to address security globally. As in the playground … or in gangland … the only realistic way to abolish nuclear threats for all is for each to stop making them against others.

Those who make nuclear threats lower their own security by adding to risks of surprise nuclear attacks against them.

It is too often forgotten that even a small nuclear attack by any one country will (even if it is not retaliated against), cause devastation in that country as well through nuclear winter. In that way too, nuclear threats are a suicide vest.

Advertisement

In a debate on ‘Civil Preparedness for War’ in the House of Lords on 20 April, MOD minister of state Lord Coaker confirmed that the government does still support the NPT and representatives would be attending the NPT review conference in New York later in April.

This could be seen as a thin sliver of hope for the UK eventually working to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

By Tom Pashby

Source link