The judge wanted everyone in the courtroom to know that when he’d signed a war orphan over to an American Marine he thought it was an emergency — that the child injured on the battlefield in Afghanistan was on death’s door, with neither a family nor a country to claim her.
A lawyer for the federal government stood up.
“That is not what happened,” she told the judge: almost everything he’d believed about the baby was untrue.
Advertisement
Kathryn Wyer, a Justice Department lawyer representing the federal government, corrected Fluvanna County Circuit Court Judge Richard Moore at a hearing on Nov. 11, 2022. The judge, who allowed an American Marine to adopt an Afghan orphan, had believed Afghanistan gave up finding her family, but the country was still searching, and eventually united the girl with relatives.
This group had gathered 15 times by then, in secret proceedings in this small-town Virginia courtroom to try to fix what had become an international incident. Fluvanna County Circuit Judge Richard Moore had granted an adoption of the orphan to U.S. Marine Joshua Mast and his wife, Stephanie, while the baby was in Afghanistan, 7,000 miles away.
Advertisement
Now the U.S. government insisted the baby’s fate had never been the judge’s to decide; officials in President Donald Trump’s first administration had chosen to unite her with relatives months before Moore gave her away, according to once-secret transcripts of the November 2022 hearing.
Thousands of pages of those transcripts and court documents were recently released as a result of The Associated Press’ three-year fight for access after a 2022 AP report about the adoption raised alarms at the highest levels of government, from the Taliban to the White House. The newly released records reveal how America’s fractured bureaucracy allowed the Masts to adopt the child who was halfway around the globe, being raised by a couple the Afghan government at that time decided were her family, in a country that does not allow non-Muslims to take custody of its children. The documents show the judge skipped critical safeguards and legal requirements.
Mast, who cited a judge’s orders not to speak publicly about the case in declining requests to comment, has said he believed — and still does — the story he told Moore about the girl, and insists he acted nobly and in the best interest of a child stuck in a war zone with an uncertain future.
Along the way, high-ranking military and government officials took extraordinary steps to help him, seemingly unaware that others in their own agencies were trying to stop him.
Advertisement
“The left hand of the United States is doing one thing,” another judge later said, describing the dysfunction, “and the right hand of the United States is doing something else.”
“I’ll probably think about this the rest of my life whether I should have said, sorry, that child is in Afghanistan. We’re just going to stand down,” Moore said at the hearing three years ago. “I don’t know whether that’s what I should have done.”
Advertisement
AP Illustration/Nat Castaneda
A remarkably quick adoption
The baby was orphaned in September 2019 when U.S. Army Rangers, along with Afghan forces, raided a rural compound. The baby’s parents were killed. She was found in the rubble, about two months old, burned and with a fractured skull and broken leg. U.S. troops scooped her up and took her to the hospital at Bagram Air Base in Kabul.
Advertisement
Children stand in front of a home destroyed during a Sept. 5, 2019, night raid by U.S. forces in a village in a remote region of Afghanistan, on Friday, Feb. 24, 2023. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi, File)
Advertisement
Children stand in front of a home destroyed during a Sept. 5, 2019, night raid by U.S. forces in a village in a remote region of Afghanistan, on Friday, Feb. 24, 2023. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi, File)
Advertisement
Advertisement
American servicemembers fell in love with her there, as she recovered. She was a symbol of hope in a long, grinding war.
The raid that killed the baby’s parents targeted transient terrorists who came into Afghanistan from a neighboring country, the records show. Some soldiers believed she might not be Afghan and tried to make a case for bringing her to the U.S.
Advertisement
The State Department attempted to make its position clear: The embassy convened a meeting that October with members of the military and the Afghan government to explain that under international law the U.S. was obligated to reunite her with her family, according to documents. State Department officials wrote that Mast, a military lawyer on a short assignment in Afghanistan, attended that meeting.
He’d met the baby for the first time days before and remained determined the child should go to the U.S., according to emails filed as exhibits.
Mast called home, where his wife was with their three sons.
“With us having children of our own, we see how vulnerable and precious children are,” Stephanie Mast testified. “And we wanted to help in whatever way we could.”
Advertisement
Marine Maj. Joshua Mast and his wife, Stephanie, arrive at Circuit Court, Thursday, March 30, 2023 in Charlottesville, Va. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)
Advertisement
Marine Maj. Joshua Mast and his wife, Stephanie, arrive at Circuit Court, Thursday, March 30, 2023 in Charlottesville, Va. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Masts, Evangelical Christians, decided to try to bring her to their home in Palmyra, Virginia.
Advertisement
Mast’s brother, Richard Mast, a lawyer with the conservative Christian law firm Liberty Counsel, filed a petition for custody in early November, and a Fluvanna County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court judge quickly approved it. The judge declared that the child was “stateless,” echoing Mast’s assertion that her parents were nomadic terrorists, and the Afghan government would issue a waiver of jurisdiction over her within days.
Afghanistan never waived jurisdiction.
Still the Masts decided custody wasn’t enough. Several days later, Moore, the Fluvanna County Circuit Court judge, got an unusual weekend call from his clerk’s office about a request for an emergency adoption, according to comments the judge made on the bench and records obtained from the Virginia Attorney General’s Office. Custody orders like the one the Masts were granted are temporary, but adoption grants a child an entirely new birth certificate, assigning them new legal parents. Moore said he was told that the girl desperately needed medical care and adoption would help get her on a plane to America.
Though the baby was being cared for by the Defense Department, the federal government insisted it received no notice of Mast’s bid for adoption, the recently released records show. Had it been notified, government lawyers said, they would have told the judge that the child was not stateless, the government was at that time searching for her family and would soon decide she was Afghan and not the child of foreigners. She was also not in a medical crisis: A month before, exhibits show, her doctor described her as “a healthy healing infant who needs normal infant care.”
Advertisement
The Masts have said in court records that they did not mislead the court; they believed that the girl was the stateless daughter of transient terrorists and Afghanistan was neither interested nor capable of caring for her.
Moore did not respond to requests for comment.
On Sunday, Nov. 10, 2019, Moore granted the Masts a temporary adoption. Moore ordered the Virginia Department of Vital Statistics to issue a new birth certificate, making her the Masts’ daughter.
Adoption cases usually creep through the court system. Moore granted the Masts the temporary adoption in a weekend.
Advertisement
“Attempting to interfere inappropriately”
Two days later, an email arrived overnight at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul from State Department headquarters. The office had heard that Mast had been granted custody of the orphan, and wanted to know if that was true, the documents show.
Officials who had been working on uniting the girl with her family seemed stunned by the email. An Army colonel later wrote in a declaration that he believed Mast was “attempting to interfere inappropriately.”
Army Col. Joseph Fairfield wrote in a legal declaration submitted in court by the federal government that by late 2019, some military officers were worried that Mast’s efforts “had diverged” from the official U.S. position about what should become of the baby, and he was “attempting to interfere inappropriately.”
Advertisement
Around that time, U.S. officials learned that a man came forward to claim the baby, records show. He told authorities he was the child’s uncle. He said the girl’s father was a local farmer, not a terrorist. His wife and five of their children were also killed. He said it was his family’s duty to take her in.
The Afghan government vetted his story. U.S. officials signed off.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Mast’s tour ended. He returned home to Virginia, and set up a crib for the baby he was certain would soon be theirs, according to court testimony. The couple quickly found an ally in an aide for Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. The aide pressed Assistant Secretary of Defense Derek Maurer to ask immigration officials to rush documents the child needed to get to the U.S. An attached memo written by another military official pointed to proof of Mast’s claim to the baby: Mast had enrolled her in the military’s health care system as his dependent.
On the application for those benefits, Mast claimed the girl had lived with him in Virginia since Sept. 4, 2019, but she had never been on American soil, a government official wrote in a declaration. Mast also wrote that her injures were a result of child abuse.
The situation worked its way to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. He signed a cable, dated Feb. 25, 2020, records show, dismissing the Fluvanna custody orders as “flawed.”
The cable said that any further delay in transferring the child could be perceived as the “U.S. government holding an Afghan child against the will of her extended family and the Afghan government.”
Advertisement
The next day, Mast filed a federal lawsuit to stop the reunification. The judge rejected his claims.
The U.S. put her on a plane to meet her relatives. They wept when they saw her, bundled in pink. The child’s uncle decided his son should raise the baby with his new wife and they quickly came to love this girl like their own daughter, they testified.
The Masts have insisted that this family is not biologically related to the baby and have questioned the process through which the Afghan government vetted them. The Afghan couple had celebrated the first step in a traditional Afghan marriage, a religious bond, but had not yet had a wedding reception, and the Masts argue they were unmarried at the time the child was given to them.
The AP agreed not to name the Afghan couple because they fear their families in Afghanistan might face retaliation from the Taliban. The court issued a protective order shielding their identities.
Advertisement
The Taliban, which now controls Afghanistan, was not in power when that country was making decisions about the child. Since taking over, the Taliban has been critical of what happened to the girl, calling it “worrying, far from human dignity and an inhumane act,” and urged the U.S. to return her to her relatives.
The Afghan couple testified they had no idea that on the other side of the globe an American judge still believed the girl was available for adoption.
Mast told Moore the child was given to an unmarried girl whose relationship to her was unclear. He testified that he maintained the child was the daughter of foreign fighters and suspected the family had ties to terrorism.
Moore said he did not learn that a federal judge had already rejected Mast’s claims to the baby. He would later say he vaguely remembered hearing that something happened in federal court but it didn’t register as important.
Advertisement
“I guess I assumed it was an administrative thing,” Moore said.
Mast continued to ask Moore to grant a final, permanent adoption.
Lawyers representing the government, the Afghan family and the child would note many defects in these proceedings; the attorney representing the child described the flaws as “glaring.” There is no Virginia law that allows a judge to adopt out a foreign child without her home country’s consent. A child must be put up for adoption by a parent or agency, and this child had never been. The court waived the requirement that the child be present when social services visited the adoptive parents’ home, that someone investigate her history, that whoever had custody be told this was happening.
In December of 2020, Moore granted a final adoption, deeming the Masts the baby’s permanent parents.
Advertisement
“She is an undocumented, orphan, stateless minor,” he wrote, “subject to this court’s jurisdiction.”
‘Is it even lawful for us to take her?’
In Afghanistan, the couple raising the girl received calls from strangers. Mast was working with Kimberley Motley, an American lawyer based in Afghanistan. Motley told the couple that a family wanted to help the girl get medical care in the U.S. But the couple refused to send the girl alone. Motley kept in touch with them for months, according to messages entered as court exhibits. Motley, through her attorney, declined to comment.
In the summer of 2021, the American military withdrew from Afghanistan and the Taliban took over. Mast contacted the couple directly, enlisting the help of a translator named Ahmad Osmani, an Afghan Christian who’d moved to the U.S. Osmani considered it his Christian duty to help the Masts, testifying that he believed it would be “a great picture to see a terrorist’s daughter become a believer and glorify God’s name.”
Mast and Osmani told the couple that they could get all three out of Afghanistan.
Advertisement
At the time, servicemembers were frantically evacuating Afghans, mostly those who helped the U.S. and would likely be targeted by the Taliban.
Amid the confusion, Mast asked colleagues in the Marines to add a baby and her caretakers to an evacuation list, the records show, claiming the State Department had sent her to an orphanage. She was living with the Afghan couple, and had never been to an orphanage.
A lieutenant colonel emailed other military officials to start the process of getting the family on a flight out. He didn’t learn that the military had worked to keep Mast away from this baby.
“Is it even lawful for us to take her?” asked a major in the Marines, according to a copy of the email.
Advertisement
Mast, who was copied on the chain, replied: “To clarify, she is completely clear on the Afghan side,” he wrote. “I am very familiar with the requirements after the last 18 months working the legal issues.”
Marine Joshua Mast emailed military colleagues requesting the girl and her caregivers be added to the list of evacuees from Afghanistan during the chaotic U.S. withdrawal in summer 2021. One questioned whether it was legal to take the girl out of the country, and Mast assured them it was.
Advertisement
Military officials asked no further questions, and soon the family was on a plane to Germany, where the Masts met them for the first time. The Afghans testified they had no idea the Masts planned to take her. The Masts have said they had tried to explain that they would.
Stephanie Mast testified that when she and her husband arrived in Germany, they “knew we had to speak to them and just tell them the truth.” She tried to explain “sacrificial love.” If the baby came with them, she told the Afghan woman, “she can have the best life possible.”
The Afghan man ripped off the wristband refugees wore and threatened to return to Afghanistan if the Americans tried to take the child.
Advertisement
The Afghan woman later said they convinced her that she’d misunderstood and persuaded them to continue to the U.S., and keep the baby with them.
The Afghans boarded a plane bound for Dulles International Airport, then a bus to Fort Pickett, a military base in Virginia turned makeshift refugee center. Meanwhile, the records show, Mast asked a State Department official he’d met in Germany to help connect him with other government contacts so he could track the family’s arrival.
Emails show employees with multiple government agencies sprung into action, including the State Department. The federal government would later say that these employees, like the military officials who evacuated the family, didn’t know that the very agency they worked for had tried to prevent Mast from taking the girl.
‘It’s like you are kidnapping her’
Rhonda Slusher, a State Department official, answered the phone at Fort Pickett. On the line was Joshua Mast.
Advertisement
He said he was going to come pick up his adoptive daughter, according to a declaration Slusher submitted in court. Slusher said she was told “there was no U.S. jurisdiction to hold the child,” and she should be given to Mast “at the earliest point possible.” Her supervisor instructed her to assist with “the transfer of the child,” she wrote in the declaration.
Mast told Slusher he was concerned the family she was being taken from “were going to be sad,” she wrote.
On Sept. 3, 2021, uniformed officers drove the Afghan family to a nondescript building near the camp’s front gate.
Slusher picked the baby up out of the car seat and insisted she hold her as the family went inside.
Advertisement
There, the Afghan woman later testified, another official, this one from the Department of Health and Human Services, told them: “you are not the parents of this child.”
“It’s like you are kidnapping her,” the Afghan man said.
The Afghan woman came toward Slusher.
“Please give me my daughter,” she said “She is my daughter.”
Advertisement
The Afghan woman testified at a hearing on May 24, 2022, describing how she begged government officials not to take the child away from her. The officials handed the girl to the Mast family, and the Afghans have not seen her since.
Advertisement
The baby cried and squirmed to get back to her, but Slusher wouldn’t let her go. The woman tried to grab the child, but Slusher pulled her hands away. The woman “crumpled to the floor crying.” She lay there for at least five minutes.
Slusher wrote in a declaration that she carried the baby outside, where Stephanie Mast was waiting in the car. Stephanie Mast fed the girl Goldfish crackers before they drove away with her husband.
“It is worth reiterating that this prolonged tragedy was entirely avoidable. The Trump administration blocked an attempt to unlawfully seize the child from her Afghan family in early 2020,” the Afghan couple’s attorneys wrote in a statement, adding that the Masts were able to take the child only because of America’s messy exit from Afghanistan. “The child and her relatives are victims of a crime and a tragedy no family should ever endure — a stark reminder that this withdrawal continues to have far-reaching and devastating consequences.”
‘A possibly errant adoption’
More than a year after the Masts took the baby home, her fate was before Judge Richard Moore again.
Advertisement
The Afghan couple found a team of lawyers willing to represent them for free, and filed a petition in Moore’s court to challenge the adoption he’d granted. Moore could undo the adoption and give the child back to the Afghan family, or uphold it, and leave her with the Masts.
“I’ve never had a case where I was so uncomfortable with either decision,” he said at the November 2022 hearing, which would be his last hearing in the case before retiring.
The judge listened for five hours as the lawyers for the Afghan couple and the government said that the adoption he’d granted was so riddled with errors it shouldn’t be called an adoption at all.
Moore blamed the federal government — it had known as early as 2020 that the Masts were trying to get the girl and a court in Fluvanna County was involved, and they did not try to stop him from issuing a “possibly errant adoption,” he said.
Advertisement
“Clearly, there were procedural irregularities and deficiencies in this case. There’s no question about that,” the judge said from the bench.
Yet for a year, in hearing after hearing, the primary question became whether the Afghan couple had a right to challenge that adoption at all; whether they were truly her family and if the Afghan government’s decision to give her to them was valid once they arrived in the U.S.
The judge and the Masts’ attorneys questioned them about their origin and upbringing, their relationship to each other and to the child.
Moore repeatedly said he did not believe they were related to the girl, nor was he inclined to consider them parents. He said no court in Afghanistan was involved in determining who should get custody of the child there. The Afghan couple’s lawyers had resisted DNA testing, saying it couldn’t conclusively find a relationship between opposite-gender half-cousins. It was also irrelevant, they argued: After the Afghan government gave the child to them, an American court should not relitigate that choice.
Advertisement
At the last hearing he held in November 2022, Moore said there were many things he wished Mast had told him before he signed the adoption. But he still trusted the Marine.
“There’s no question in my mind. Their total involvement was to save this child,” Moore said.
A week later, Moore published his thoughts on the case in a written document, and reiterated his opinion that “anything they did improper grew” out of the Masts’ desire to help the child.
He was less sympathetic to the Afghans. The Afghan woman testified that she had two Afghan government identifications, one that included her real age and a second she obtained intentionally making herself younger to enable her to enroll in school. They “misrepresented certain facts and lied … for their own purposes,” Moore wrote.
Advertisement
The Masts, too, have described the Afghans as untrustworthy, even threatening. They submitted court records alleging the Afghan man was flagged in a database of suspected terrorists upon entry to the U.S., which they reported to law enforcement. Attorneys for the Afghans responded that the government said in a sealed letter to the court that the man was not the subject of the database entry. The man remains in the U.S. and frequently flies from Texas to Virginia for court hearings.
With Moore’s retirement, the Masts and the Afghans found themselves before a new judge, Claude Worrell.
Advertisement
This courtroom sketch depicts Marine Maj. Joshua Mast and his wife, Stephanie, during a Circuit Court hearing before Judge Claude V. Worrell Jr., Thursday, March 30, 2023, in Charlottesville, Va. (Dana Verkouteren via AP)
This courtroom sketch depicts Marine Maj. Joshua Mast and his wife, Stephanie, during a Circuit Court hearing before Judge Claude V. Worrell Jr., Thursday, March 30, 2023, in Charlottesville, Va. (Dana Verkouteren via AP)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Worrell rebuked the federal government for its “inconsistent” approach, noting it was arguing the baby should be immediately returned to the Afghans, while its own employees had repeatedly assisted the Masts along the way.
It did not take Worrell long to come to a wholly different conclusion than Moore. Worrell wasn’t concerned about biological relationships. What mattered, he said, was Afghanistan claimed her as its citizen, so got to decide her fate.
The Afghan couple went outside to a patch of grass in the parking lot and prayed. They thought they would soon bring the baby to their home in Texas, where they’ve kept a bedroom ready for her, decorated with butterfly decals.
The Virginia Court of Appeals has since upheld Worrell’s decision voiding the adoption, and the case went before the Virginia Supreme Court in February 2025. It has yet to issue a ruling. As the years dragged on, the child remained with the Marine and his family.
The Marine Corps held an administrative hearing in October 2024 to determine whether Mast violated military rules. A three-member panel found that he acted in a way that was “unbecoming” of an officer, but that didn’t warrant suspension or other formal punishment.
The federal government has indicated in court in recent months that it is reconsidering its role in the case, and Trump’s second administration could reverse his first administration’s opinion that Mast had no right to the child. The Justice Department did not respond to repeated requests to clarify its current position on the child’s fate.
Advertisement
It has been four years since the Afghan couple has seen her.
In July, she turned 6.
___
AP data journalist Angeliki Kastanis contributed to this report
Heart Radio presenter and Britain’s Got Talent judge Amanda Holden made the admission, while also expressing hopes of welcoming a new addition to her and her husband’s family
Samantha Masters Content Editor
17:30, 06 Feb 2026
Amanda Holden has amusingly opened up about the numerous innocent activities she has done behind her husband’s back. The 54-year-old’s admission came earlier this week after her colleague Jamie Theakston informed listeners about his wife’s choice to rescue two additional cats, while he was away.
Having encountered the same scenario before, Jamie quipped that he can no longer take holidays for fear his house will become a “cattery”.
Advertisement
“She smuggled two in when I was away last time,” he told listeners on the Heart Radio Breakfast Show. “What she does is uses the cover of me going away so that I can’t stop her.”
After Amanda suggested that his wife Sophie must meticulously plan her actions while he is out at work, Jamie agreed.
“Yeah, she’s got a whole double life that she leads,” he joked.
“And then if I’m on a golf weekend or away with my mates, she feels, ‘Well if he’s doing that, I’m going to get more kittens’.
Advertisement
“So now, I can’t now go away or she’s going to have a cattery.”
Amanda then confessed that she had a comparable approach, acknowledging the frequent times she has performed a task while her husband, Chris Hughes, is away.
“I love that she does that, it makes me feel better because when Chris goes away, I decorate a room or clear out his awful t-shirts, burn the crocs,” she shared.
Advertisement
“I do so many things behind his back like that, innocent things, but things where he’d get cross if he was at home or he’d say, ‘We don’t need to do that’.
“I really do want to rescue another puppy you see, but Chris is putting his foot down at the moment,” she added, before joking: “When is he going away?”
Later on in the show, she added: “I think he thinks he’s alone and that I’m just this wife that does all this stuff behind his back and he’s not alone Jamie, you’re there with him.
“There must be loads of people whose husbands and wives that do this sort of thing,” she added.
Advertisement
Looking back on previous choices, which have included her rescuing their latest furry addition from Greece, she continued: “Chris always says, ‘I don’t know why you’re asking me because you’re going to do it anyway’.”
Last month, Amanda informed listeners she was eager to welcome another puppy into the household.
The couple already have a bustling home with their two daughters, Hollie and Lexie, rescue dog Rudie, and cats Muffy and Bolt.
Advertisement
And while her husband has made it clear he doesn’t want any additional pets, Amanda isn’t giving up.
In a light-hearted on-air appeal during a recent episode, she said: “[We’ve got] lots of furry babies, I’m going to have to talk to Chris because I really want to rescue another puppy and if he’s listening and it goes out on air, it’ll be very difficult for him to turn me down.”
Trying to persuade him further, Amanda added: “Darling, I love you.”
Amanda and Alan’s Greek Job continues tonight at 7.30pm on BBC One.
The vehicle failed to stop when directed by police which then led to a pursuit at speed
Three arrests were made in the early hours of this morning, (Friday) following a vehicle pursuit in Ballynahinch. PSNI said the pursuit started shortly after midnight when a red Audi failed to stop when signalled to do so by officers.
Advertisement
The vehicle took off from Main Street in the direction of Dromara at speed, before it was brought to a stop by colleagues from the Roads Policing United. They managed to stop the car in the vicinity of the Rathfriland Road, in Dromara.
A man, aged 27 was arrested on suspicion of a number of motoring offences including dangerous driving and taking a motor vehicle without authority. Police confirmed that he remains in custody at this time.
A 17-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of a number of offences including criminal damage. He has since been bailed pending further enquiries. A 25-year-old woman was also arrested on suspicion of a number of offences including possession of suspected Class B and C controlled drugs. She has since been bailed pending further enquiries.
Deputy Assistant Commissioner Hayley Sewart, of the Metropolitan Police, said in a statement: “I can confirm that officers from the Met’s Central Specialist Crime team are in the process of carrying out search warrants at two addresses, one in the Wiltshire area, and another in the Camden area.
LONDON (AP) — British police on Friday searched two properties linked to ex-ambassador Peter Mandelson as part of a probe into potential misconduct stemming from his ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein.
Metropolitan Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner Hayley Sewart said that “officers from the Met’s Central Specialist Crime team are in the process of carrying out search warrants at two addresses, one in the Wiltshire area, and another in the Camden area.
“The searches are related to an ongoing investigation into misconduct in public office offenses, involving a 72-year-old man.”
Mandelson, 72, has homes in Wiltshire in western England and the Camden area of London.
Advertisement
The former Cabinet minister, ambassador and elder statesman of the governing Labour Party is being investigated for potential misconduct in public office over documents, part of a trove of Epstein files released in the United States, suggesting he passed sensitive government information to Epstein a decade and a half ago.
Mandelson has not been arrested or charged.
Misconduct in public office carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who fired Mandelson from his ambassadorial job over earlier revelations about his Epstein ties, is facing a political storm over his decision in 2024 to appoint him to Britain’s most important diplomatic post.
From sightseeing to sunbathing and avoiding seasickness, there is plenty to consider when packing for a cruise.
You need to prepare for different temperatures at a variety of cruise port stops and there may even be dress codes on board.
Storage space can vary on cruise lines depending on the type of cabin so it is important to pack efficiently.
Cruise lines tend to have similar weight limits to airlines for luggage but unlike going on a aeroplane, you can have as many suitcases that will fit in your cabin.
Advertisement
This is especially helpful if you are UK-based and sailing from a port such as Southampton as you just need to fit your cases into a car and transfer them onto the ship.
You can take as many suitcases as you like on board but there are weight limits (Marc Shoffman)
There is no need to overpack, though.
While there are, of course, the holiday essentials you’d expect to ack – such as a toothbrush, suncream and spending money, as well as the obvious items including swimming costumes and comfortable shoes for exploring – it’s worth noting that many essentials may be available to buy on the ship or even provided for free.
Advertisement
We asked cruise experts what items passengers really do and don’t need in their suitcase for a sailing.
Themed and formal nights
If you like getting dressed up, don’t forget to pack your tuxedo or cocktail dress.
Most cruises will have a formal or cocktail night where guests are encouraged to wear smart attire.
Advertisement
These aren’t compulsory but can be a fun way to have a more elegant evening and get some smart pictures while on holiday.
There may also be themed party nights such as a 1980s disco so you may want to pack your leg warmers or come equipped with fun accessories.
Marc and Danielle Shoffman went back to the 1980s with Ambassador Cruise Line on a themed cruise (Marc Shoffman)
You can often find out what the themes will be by checking Facebook groups for previous sailings or reading through your booking information and itinerary before you board.
Advertisement
“Staterooms have plenty of storage, so guests have more space than they think,” said Janet Parton, vice president of business development for the UK, Europe and Australia at Celestyal.
“We favour relaxed style cruising, and our cruises include casual days and a few slightly smarter evenings, so a small selection of versatile outfits that can be mixed and matched is ideal.
“It’s also worth considering dining. Breakfast and lunch are generally casual, while dinner is usually smart casual, with more formal wear for gala nights. On Celestyal, we also host sail away parties and celebration evenings such as our blue-and-white themed Greek night and a white night, which are always popular and give guests the chance to dress up if they wish.”
Most cruise lines such a MSC Cruises will supply towels so you don’t need to pack your own (Marc Shoffman)
You will want to bring your own toiletries such as a toothbrush and makeup, but there are some items you can leave at home.
Parton added: “Before setting sail, always check what’s already included on board. Items such as hairdryers, pool towels and toiletries are provided, which saves luggage space for gifts and unique souvenirs from destinations.”
There are lots of items you may need to carry around a cruise ship such as you phone or cruise card, and you may need your passport and money when exploring ashore.
Ambassador Cruise Line’s chief experience officer Bob McGowan said: “Having a compact bag whilst at dinner, enjoying a show or popping to the bar can be handy – helping to avoid that moment of panic when you realise you’ve left your phone in the restaurant – whilst a rucksack is great for a big day of exploring once in port.”
Parton added:”Keep a small day bag handy for shore excursions, with essentials such as a swimming attire for a cooling dip in the sea or pool onboard when you return, sunscreen and a hat, a reusable water bottle and local currency. Any necessary medication should go in your carry-on so it’s accessible straight away.
“With a little planning, guests can pack lighter, stay organised, and enjoy every moment on and off the ship.”
It is also worth having a backpack ready with swimwear and any other essentials you may want on embarkation day while you are waiting for your suitcase to be delivered to your cabin.
Advertisement
Prepare for seasickness
Seasickness can strike any sailors (Marc Shoffman)
Even seasoned sailors can get seasick so whether you are a first-time cruiser or an experienced passenger, it is always worth packing motion-sickness tablets.
Some passengers also use sea bands or put special patches behind their ears, which are designed to alleviate the symptoms of motion sickness.
“Having a few seasickness tablets stowed away in your suitcase can provide peace of mind, even if you don’t end up using them,” McGowan added.
“Alternatively, many cruise brands including Ambassador have seasickness tablets freely available to offer to travellers when on board.”
Holiday reading
Advertisement
You may not need to pack many books if there is a library on the ship (Getty Images/iStockphoto)
A book is a must-have item on any type of holiday but McGowan says passengers shouldn’t worry about bringing too many on a cruise.
He explained: “Most cruise ships have their own library or at the very least a book swap arrangement so you can find a whole selection of literature to choose from during your sailing.”
Most cruise cabins will have a cupboard and drawers, but you can create extra storage. One top tip is using metal hooks that you can purchase off Amazon for around £5. These cling to the walls of a cabin to provide another area for your items.
Lindsay Haslehurst, head of product and commercial at Cruise118.com, said: “Almost all cabin walls are metal, so metal hooks are a game-changer for hanging hats, lanyards, or even wet swimwear.”
Cruise ducks and decor
Advertisement
Amelie and Isabelle Shoffman with their cruise duck collection aboard Discovery Princess (Marc Shoffman)
Many cruise passengers take part in an onboard scavenger hunt tradition where guests hide ducks around a ship for other travellers to find. You can either keep your stash or hide it for someone else.
This can be a great way to keep the kids occupied while on long sea days so it is worth packing your own to take part.
Some guests even bring magnets or items from home to decorate their cabin door, which can make it easier to spot your stateroom.
Students from Sedgefield Community College visited Hardwick East Park yesterday (February 5), ahead of the 2026 English National Cross Country Championships.
They took part in a series of mini races on part of the course that thousands of runners from across the country will tackle later this month.
The championships will be held on Saturday, February 21, marking the first time the event has returned to County Durham in 25 years.
National Cross Country Championships heads to Sedgefield later this month (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)
Students from Sedgefield Community College (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)
Organised by the English Cross Country Association alongside Sedgefield Harriers, the championships will feature 10 separate junior and senior races, starting at 11am.
Advertisement
During their visit, students from four year groups competed in a series of ‘Queen and King of the Hill’ races on part of the course, with prizes awarded to the fastest runners.
With financial support from North East Mayor Kim McGuinness, Sedgefield Harriers is investing additional resources into promoting the championships and encouraging more people to take up the sport.
The project aligns with the mayor’s ambition for the North East to become the UK’s first ‘Region of Sport’.
Students from Sedgefield Community College at the launch event (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)
Sue Dobson, chair of Sedgefield Harriers, said: “There’s a real buzz around the club and Sedgefield in general as we prepare to host the national championships of our sport. Loads of Harriers have signed up to take part, including some of our junior runners.
Advertisement
“A lot of them are students at Sedgefield Community College and we hope that their energy and enthusiasm will inspire more young people in the area to take up athletics.”
Students from Sedgefield Community College (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)
Lesley Strickland, events and sports lead at the North East Combined Authority, added: “Hosting the Nationals is a fantastic chance to showcase County Durham and inspire people of all ages to get into running.
“Grassroots sport is where healthy habits start, and events like this can spark that first step.”
Advertisement
Student Lewis Amer said keeping active has helped him develop socially.
He said: “I enjoy being active and healthy. I particularly enjoy the social aspects of sport. These are really important to me. I have made lots of friends through having an active lifestyle and also develop many personal qualities like teamwork and communication.”
Students from Sedgefield Community College (Image: SARAH CALDECOTT)
Steven Hepples, leader of sport and promotion of active lifestyles at Sedgefield Community College, said: “Events like this are fantastic for everybody in the local community. This includes the young and the old.
“Providing opportunities to spectate at, or even be a part of, such an event will hopefully inspire more people to lead healthy, active lifestyles.
Advertisement
“Whether trying something for the first time or achieving personal performance goals, we all need to find our own motivation to lead a health active lifestyle. Events like this in our community will support this.
From all of us at Sedgefield Community College, we would like to wish all competitors and organisers every success.
A British man has died after falling from the sixth-floor balcony of a hotel in Spain.
The country’s National Police are investigating the circumstances behind the death of the 37-year-old in the Costa del Sol town of Torremolinos in the early hours of Wednesday, according to local newspaper Diario Sur.
Datawrapper
This content is provided by Datawrapper, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Datawrapper cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Datawrapper cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Datawrapper cookies for this session only.
Parts of the East Coast Mainline are closed this afternoon – affecting train travel between York and Doncaster.
The incident was reported at 2.20pm today (February 6) with the entire mainline set to be impacted by the travel delays.
RECOMMENDED READING:
Advertisement
Major disruption is expected until the end of the day and trains may be severely delayed by up to 60 minutes or revised
“A failure of the electricity supply between Doncaster and York means that the line towards York is blocked. As a result, trains running between these stations may be severely delayed or revised,” said a spokesperson for National Rail at time.
Network Rail engineers are on site and are investigating the issue.
Your ticket can be used at no extra cost on the following services and routes:
Advertisement
CrossCountry between Doncaster, Leeds, York and Newcastle / Edinburgh
Grand Central between London Kings Cross and Doncaster / Bradford Interchange / York
Lumo between London Kings Cross and Edinburgh
Northern between Doncaster, Leeds, York and Newcastle
TransPennine Express between Manchester, Leeds and York / Newcastle
LNER between Doncaster and Leeds
Northern between Doncaster and Leeds
TransPennine Express between Leeds and York
LNER and CrossCountry between York and Newcastle
TransPennine Express between Newcastle and Edinburgh
ScotRail between Edinburgh and Glasgow Queen Street from 16:30
You do not need to amend your ticket to use it on these services.
Police received a report of a serious assault in the early hours of Monday (February 2) and were called to an address in the Eston area just before 3am.
It was reported that a man had entered the property, violently attacked the woman and fled with two mobile phones.
The woman was taken to James Cook University Hospital for treatment for her injuries.
Advertisement
A 34‑year‑old man was arrested on Thursday (February 5).
He remains in custody and now faces questioning on suspicion of aggravated burglary, theft, stalking and assault.
A spokesperson from Cleveland Police said: “Safeguarding measures have been put in place for the woman and enquiries by Redcar & Cleveland CID are ongoing.”
.jpg)
