He will also miss the opening two games of next season after being hit with a suspension

Ospreys wing Daniel Kasende has been banned for four matches after being shown a red card in his side’s United Rugby Championship clash with Cardiff last week.

The 30-year-old was carded in the first half of the Ospreys‘ 24-21 defeat at Cardiff Arms Park after leading with his forearm while in possession and striking opposition fly-half Callum Sheedy in the face. While Kasende was initially shown a yellow card by referee Christopher Allison, this was later updated to a 20-minute red card.

Appearing at a disciplinary hearing earlier this week, the South African back accepted that he had committed an act of foul play warranting a red card.

JOIN OUR WALES RUGBY FACEBOOK PAGE Latest news, analysis and much more

An initial six-match suspension was halved due to Kasende’s apology, acceptance of the red card and good conduct throughout the disciplinary process. However, an extra match was then added to his ban due to his previous disciplinary record.

With the Ospreys now out of the URC play-off race, the wing will now miss the final two matches of this season as his side take on Scarlets this weekend before travelling to Leinster seven days later.

He will also miss the first two games of the 2026/27 campaign, which will include pre-season matches.

There were four other yellow cards shown during Friday’s ill-disciplined derby match, with Ospreys’ Dan Edwards and Owen Watkin and Cardiff’s Liam Belcher and Josh McNally all sent to the sin-bin.

Ospreys head coach Mark Jones admitted after the game that was “surprised” Kasende had not been given the same punishment as Belcher, who was shown an early yellow card for a head-on-head collision with Morgan Morris.

“They [match officials] thought his [Kasende] offence was worthy of a red for 20 minutes,” he said. “I’m not adept with the criteria of these things, but I look at the force of the forearm compared to two heads coming together and one looks like it could do more damage than the other.

“I was surprised perhaps they weren’t treated the same, but that’s not for me to comment on.”

A statement from the URC on Friday read: “The disciplinary process related to Daniel Kasende’s red card in the BKT United Rugby Championship Round 16 game against Cardiff Rugby on Friday, April 24 has resulted in a four-game suspension.

“After an act of foul play by player No 14 (Daniel Kasende), referee Christopher Allison showed the player a red card in the 18th minute of the game under Law 9.11 – Players must not do anything that is reckless or dangerous to others including leading with the below or forearm.

“In the Player’s responses to the Judicial Officer overseeing the disciplinary process (Rose Alice Murphy), he had accepted that he had committed an act of foul play which warranted a red card. Ms. Murphy found that the incident met the red card threshold, with entry of mid-range warranting six weeks.

“The player received three weeks (50%) mitigation due to his apology, acceptance of the red card and good conduct throughout the disciplinary process, however due to his previous record, a further week was added which results in a four-game suspension.”

Follow all of our channels to ensure you stay up to date with the latest Welsh rugby news. Sign up to our free daily newsletter here and our WhatsApp channel here for all the breaking news.

More than 4.2 million people are registered to vote in the Scottish Parliament election in May.

Scotland is gearing up for a major national vote that will determine its political direction for the coming years, with voters set to choose representatives at both local and regional level.

Millions of people across the country are expected to take part in the Scottish Parliament election on Thursday, May 7, marking the biggest democratic event since the 2024 general election. Most postal votes have already been delivered, while in person voting will take place between 7am and 10pm on election day.

All 129 Members of the Scottish Parliament will be elected, shaping the composition of Holyrood and influencing decisions on key areas such as health and education.

Here is everything you need to know about the upcoming elections.

Which elections are taking place in Scotland on May 7?

The Scottish Parliament election will decide who governs across a range of devolved issues. Every MSP seat is up for election, including 73 constituency MSPs and 56 regional MSPs, with seven representatives elected in each region.

Voters are given two ballot papers and cast two separate votes. One vote is used to elect a constituency MSP, while the second is for regional representation.

Constituency MSPs are chosen using a first past the post system, where the candidate with the highest number of votes wins. Regional MSPs are selected through a proportional system, with voters choosing either a political party or an individual candidate. Seats are then allocated using a formula that takes into account both the number of votes received and the number of constituencies already won.

In most cases, the party with the highest number of MSPs goes on to form the Scottish Government, with its leader becoming first minister.

What ID do I need to vote?

Voters do not need to show identification to vote in person in the Scottish Parliament election.

How can I find my polling station?

The deadline to register to vote was midnight on Monday, April 20. Anyone who registered by that date should receive a polling card with details of their local polling station.

Those who have voted previously and have not changed address will already be registered. Polling station locations can also be checked online by entering a postcode here.

What is the difference between the two ballot papers?

At polling stations, voters will receive two ballot papers. The lilac coloured paper is for the constituency vote and lists candidates standing to represent the local area. The candidate with the most votes becomes the constituency MSP.

The peach coloured ballot paper is used for regional voting. Instead of selecting an individual candidate, voters choose a party or a name from a list. This system is designed to balance representation, meaning parties that win fewer constituencies have a greater chance of gaining regional seats.

When will the results be announced?

Unlike some previous elections, ballots will not be counted overnight. Counting will begin on the morning of Friday, May 8, with results expected throughout the afternoon. A full picture of the outcome is likely by early evening.

Who can vote in Scotland?

Anyone aged 16 or over on polling day who is registered to vote and lives in Scotland can take part, provided they are not legally excluded. Eligible voters must be British or Irish citizens, or qualifying foreign nationals with permission to live in the UK.

Ways to vote in Scotland

There are three ways to vote in the election. People can vote in person at polling stations between 7am and 10pm, vote by post, or appoint a proxy to vote on their behalf.

Voting rules and what to expect

Polling stations provide writing materials, although voters can bring their own. Mobile phones can be used for accessibility purposes such as magnification or lighting, but taking photos inside polling stations is strictly prohibited.

Taking selfies or revealing how someone has voted can result in a fine or imprisonment. Photography is allowed outside polling stations.

Other polling station guidance

Children are allowed to accompany voters but cannot mark ballot papers. Assistance dogs are permitted, while other animals may be allowed at the discretion of local authorities.

People who have consumed alcohol can still vote unless their behaviour is disruptive. Staff are available to assist disabled voters, and equipment such as tactile voting devices and large print ballot papers should be provided.

The airline has confirmed that the route will be axed at the end of May despite running since 2018, as the price of jet fuel leads to cancellations of a number of flight routes across Europe

A major European airline has cancelled a route from the UK that has been running since 2018, and confirmed that it’ll no longer be available to book as of the end of the month.

The move comes as the German airline, one of the largest in Europe, also announced plans to cut 20,000 short-haul flights over the summer as conflict in the Middle East drives up jet fuel prices and has led to fears of shortages.

Lufthansa, the flag carrier airline for Germany, has announced it’ll no longer run its service between Glasgow and Frankfurt, and the last flight between the two cities available to book is on May 31.

A Lufthansa Group spokesman told the Scottish Sun: “Following the decision to discontinue Lufthansa CityLine flights effective immediately and to reduce unprofitable flights in the future due to high kerosene prices, the Lufthansa Group’s summer schedule will be reduced by just under one percent of available seat-kilometers.

“To compensate for this, Lufthansa has taken immediate action and will consolidate the flight schedules of all Lufthansa Group airlines, cancelling 20,000 flights by the end of October. As a result of these decisions, flights to Glasgow will no longer be operated by Lufthansa via Frankfurt, but for the time being, by Edelweiss via Zurich offering access to the Swiss International Air Lines network.”

Lufthansa isn’t the only European airline to cancel flights. Scandinavian airline SAS confirmed it’s cancelling over 1,000 flights after the cost of jet fuel doubled. In the USA, United Airlines announced it would be cancelling 5% of flights in the short term, aiming to restore its full schedule by autumn.

Other airlines are raising prices to try to cover the soaring costs. Virgin Atlantic has said the aviation sector “cannot absorb” jet‑fuel costs at their current levels, forcing them to increase ticket prices.

READ MORE: EasyJet launches new UK flight to car-free city with £2 pintsREAD MORE: I am saving £3,000 on each family holiday by taking the kids away during term-time

Corneel Koster, Virgin Atlantic’s chief executive, told the Telegraph: “I was looking at improving our financial results by a really significant chunk. And then this happens. We have never seen jet fuel at these levels, with prices more than doubling. The industry cannot absorb increases like this.”

The airline has added a surcharge of £50 to its economy class tickets, while those in premium economy will need to pay another £180, and business class passengers will be faced with an additional £360 cost. However, the airline says these surcharges still don’t cover the rising costs.

After labour costs, fuel is the second-highest expense for airlines, and accounts for around 27% of its operating expenses. Prices for jet fuel have doubled since the conflict began, rising from $85 to $90 per barrel to $150 to $200 per barrel in recent weeks.

Have a story you want to share? Email us at webtravel@reachplc.com

That’s a wrap on King Charles and Queen Camilla’s historic (and controversial) US state visit — the first since President George W. Bush hosted the late Queen Elizabeth in 2007.

Considering the current state of UK and US relations, due to the transatlantic divide over Ukraine and the Middle East, it was a high-stakes trip.

However, the POTUS and monarch seemed to put on a united front, with state dinners and ceremonial welcomes used to complement and tease one another.

Case in point: Trump described the two countries’ friendship as ‘unlike any other on Earth,’ while the King poked fun at the president, reminding him that he’s Canada’s head of state.

Schmoozing aside, it would be remiss to ignore all the times Trump went against the royal rule book. After all, he’s famous for it.

From ignoring the ‘look but don’t touch’ policy to history literally repeating itself, it’s like it’s 2018 all over again.

You know, when he brazenly walked in front of Queen Elizabeth during a guard of honour inspection?

Trump walked in front of Queen Camilla

Yep, we’re going straight in on this one, because Trump clearly hasn’t learned his lesson from last time.

On Tuesday, the King and Queen were returning to the White House after a private welcome from the president and First Lady, Melania. The foursome was greeted by a long line of officials, including US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

Footage showed Camilla making the first move by shaking the outstretched hands. But it wasn’t long before Trump was caught cutting in front of the Queen, who immediately appeared taken aback.

King Charles was also reportedly caught in the crossfire, struggling to get through the handshakes. Eventually, the pair both gave up, as Trump continued to make himself the centre of attention.

Trump touched King Charles

We get it, there are a lot of rules and regulations surrounding the royals — but one of the most well-known is the ‘don’t touch’ policy.

Traditionally, protocol states that non-royals cannot touch royals unless they have initiated the contact first.

On this trip, Trump clearly considered himself an exception to the rule, as when greeting the monarch at the White House, he patted the King’s shoulder.

Following the interaction, body language expert Judi James told the Daily Mail: ‘This touch on the arm as they walked in also looked like a more political gesture.

‘It was also the first real gesture of active, “special” friendship here from a rather more subdued Trump than the very effusive rituals we saw during their last meeting [in September 2025].’

Despite the breach, James suggested that it didn’t offend the monarch.

She said: ‘Charles has always seemed more relaxed about that than his mother [Queen Elizabeth II], and Trump’s gesture was extremely tempered for Trump.

‘Just a light, tentative and rather polite touch to steer Charles inside.’

This wasn’t the only time some non-consensual touching went on, though. Trump also touched Charles’ knee during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House.

Trump made it political

This is perhaps the most shocking disregard of the rules. Anyone who has watched The Crown will know that the monarch’s job is to keep things neutral, especially when it comes to politics.

Royals cannot be seen favouring one political party over another, as it undermines their position as non-partisan. The monarchy’s survival literally depends on staying above politics, as part of the King’s job is to serve as a constant figurehead while elected governments change.

Still, it’s one rule for us and another for Trump, as he announced to a room of dignitaries that the King ‘agreed’ with him on the ongoing war in Iran.

Following a lavish White House state dinner, he said: ‘Charles agrees with me even more than I do. We’re never going to let that opponent have a nuclear weapon.’

MORE: Trump’s only fear about assassination is bulletproof vest making him look fat

MORE: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may have jeopardised royal relations, expert says

MORE: What did Charles and Camilla write in their handwritten note at the 9/11 memorial?

Former Cardiff City captain Sean Morrison’s exclusive WalesOnline column

Pre-season is a funny one. From the outside, people see footballers jetting off to Portugal or Spain and assume it’s all sunshine and easy living. The reality? Sometimes it can be absolute chaos.

First things first, the off-season is crucial.

As soon as the season finishes, the lads are told to have two or three weeks of complete rest – and I mean complete. Don’t lift a finger.

Even if you haven’t played much, you’ve still trained non-stop for 10 months, so your body needs that reset.

After that, you’re back into it with an individual programme. Everyone’s is different – gym work, running, body fat targets. The staff keep a close eye on it all.

These days, most lads are so professional you don’t really see anyone coming back in terrible shape anymore. If you do, you’re instantly chasing it and it shows.

I always liked to tick over a bit, especially with leg weights, just to keep everything around my knees strong. But generally, by the time you report back, you should be ready to hit the ground running – literally.

Now, pre-seasons themselves… they’ve changed massively.

When I first started, it was brutal. Eight to 10 days of just running – 400s, 800s, mile runs – getting absolutely beasted. Football in the morning, running again in the evening. Proper old-school.

The best one I ever did was under Nigel Adkins at Reading.

Everything was ball-based from day one. You were still working hard, still getting your fitness in, but it was all through football. I loved that. And to be fair, that’s the direction the game has gone in now.

But not every pre-season is smooth.

I remember one Cardiff City pre-season in Germany under Paul Trollope and Ryland Morgans – the pitches we played on were a disgrace. Rock hard, massive divots everywhere, genuinely dangerous.

I remember Lennie Lawrence saying, “We can’t play here, this is ridiculous!”

One game got called off, so we went back to the training ground to play another game and it was abandoned half way through because of a storm!

The gym wasn’t great, the hotel was poor… those little details matter more than people think. The boys were then chasing minutes right into the start of the season and we started terribly. Paul lost his job after just 12 games that season. Brutal.

Then you’ve got the random stuff.

Under Neil Warnock we went to Champneys in Leicestershire during a heatwave. No air-con.

It was so hot that lads were dragging their mattresses into corridors and even bathrooms just to try and sleep.

Me and Joe Ralls were roommates and we would to sit in the lobby playing cards until late because we didn’t want to go back to the room.

Trying to train properly after a night like that? No chance.

And then there was America, the summer immediately after relegation from the Premier League.

We turned up to one pitch and it wasn’t even grass — it was sand. They’d spray-painted it green to make it look like a football pitch! You could literally put your finger straight through it. It was baking hot as well. You couldn’t make it up.

After that we went to New Mexico, about 1,500 metres above sea level. The altitude was a killer.

We had to train at the crack of dawn, couldn’t do double sessions, and again the pitches weren’t great. It’s a bit of pot luck sometimes – you just don’t know what you’re going to get.

There were also the “team bonding” ideas, which weren’t always popular to say the least.

I remember being sent into a forest in Germany with a compass and coordinates. We were split into five teams and had to rendezvous back at a certain point.

Lads had never read a map in their lives. Kagisho Dikgacoi was still with Cardiff then and, bless him, I remember the look on his face. He was devastated!

It was pouring down with rain – an absolute shambles. The boys were fuming. They gave us a golf day afterwards to calm things down!

It’s a different world now, though.

When I was 17 at Swindon, the bonding session was going out into the nearest town after the last game and being on it until 4am. I loved it at the time, trying to prove myself with the older lads. That doesn’t really happen anymore.

These days it’s more golf, maybe a quiet beer, a bit of fishing. I remember doing clay pigeon shooting one pre-season. The professionalism has gone through the roof.

And to be fair, clubs are smarter with pre-season planning now.

I read that Cardiff are going to Cork this summer – that sounds ideal. Close to home, fans can travel, and importantly the staff will have checked everything out beforehand.

Brian Barry-Murphy, returning to his hometown, will know exactly what he’s getting – pitches, facilities, all of it.

Because trust me, if you get that wrong, it can make a long few weeks feel even longer.

And, needless to say, this pre-season is important. There is a real buzz and momentum around Cardiff and there will be positive press and a little spotlight on them when that Championship season hurtles around in August. And rightly so.

They are an exciting team, group of players and staff. With supporters on their side, I cannot wait to see what they do this summer and am already excited to see this team test themselves back in the Championship.

First, though, it’s time for them to rest. They’ve certainly earned it.

The world economy is at a crossroads. International trade is slowing, economic uncertainty is rising, and trade between the US and China – the world’s two largest economies – risks pulling apart. And it is not just trade: the two countries also invest less in each other than they did just a few years ago.

What is driving this reconfiguration of trade? For some large economies, including the US under President Donald Trump, a desire for greater self-reliance is central. Between 2017 and 2023, American imports fell most sharply in the very products where the US had been most reliant on China – including industrial machinery, computers and computer parts, and other electronic equipment such as monitors.

This has important implications for global value chains (GVCs). GVCs are the backbone of international trade – production activities from research and product design to assembly are distributed across various locations, with “value” being added at each stage. This redistribution can take place across several countries, co-ordinated by multinational firms.

The reconfiguration of GVCs is accelerating, and so industrialised economies now have two main options. They can reshore production, bringing manufacturing back to their own countries (a stated priority for the current US administration).

Or they can “friendshore”, shifting imports and investments towards economies that are either geographically closer, or with which they have long-standing relationships.

À lire aussi :
After a year of Trump, who are the winners and losers from US tariffs?

For developing countries, the balance between these two strategies is crucial. If advanced economies reshore a substantial share of production, developing countries could suffer as investment and jobs are lost.

And automation and digitisation now make it more convenient for advanced countries to produce goods at home, making this a greater risk to these poorer countries than it was a decade ago.

For consumers though, this reshoring could mean higher prices for everyday goods, at least in the short term, because of the higher costs of manufacturing in more advanced economies. It should be said, however, that the empirical evidence for this remains limited.

Risks and opportunities

But friendshoring offers an alternative. Early signals from countries like Mexico and Vietnam – which have recently seen an increase in investment and factory expansions from multinational firms – suggest that friendshoring can create opportunities. When paired with supportive government policies such as investment incentives or help to upgrade technology, these shifts can ensure that more production takes place domestically. This can lead to greater technology spillovers and learning.

To understand the risks and opportunities, we examined the specific products where US-China decoupling is most pronounced (that is, where trade is reducing). From this analysis, two broad clusters emerged, each with different implications for developing economies.

The first group mainly includes relatively complex goods – things like consumer electronics, vehicle components, chemicals and machinery. Here, the US is both diversifying its imports quickly and is already producing these goods competitively.

The products and sectors at the heart of the reconfiguration of GVCs

These products can easily be reshored, particularly if automation lowers costs. Semiconductors, for instance, are already the focus of major US reshoring efforts. Yet the risk to current producers of the US reshoring appears limited for now. While the US has reduced imports from China of these products, other developing regions have not experienced a similar trend.

In the second group, the US is diversifying but is not competitive enough to bring production home. This group accounted for just over 6% of finished products that the US imported in 2023 – roughly US$181 billion (£134 billion). This is a small share overall, but economically significant.

Within this group, two types of opportunity emerge. Technologically complex goods, such as electrical equipment, computers and car parts, offer the greatest potential for middle-income economies with strong manufacturing experience to win contracts and investments. Lower-tech goods like textiles and furniture are better suited to lower-income countries. In both cases, governments need to negotiate carefully to ensure investments add value locally, support skills development and avoid social or environmental harm.

For consumers worldwide, friendshoring offers a more benign outlook than reshoring or tariffs. Goods may simply be made in different countries, with prices remaining broadly stable.

Who could gain?

So far, east and south-eastern Asia – including Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia – have captured the largest share of these friendshoring opportunities, particularly in high-tech sectors like computers. Their exports to China have also risen, reinforcing their central role in Asian manufacturing networks. But whether this momentum continues will depend on tariffs, production costs and the pace of automation.

Other beneficiaries could include Latin America and Caribbean nations, led by Mexico. Here, the automotive sector dominates export growth. South Asia could also benefit, with India expanding in both high- and low-tech products, and Bangladesh at the lower-tech end. In contrast, Africa and western Asia remain largely absent from the emerging friendshoring landscape.

The risk to these countries of large-scale reshoring remains limited for now but cannot be ignored amid shifting global trade and investment patterns. But friendshoring could offset or even exceed potential losses, offering new pathways for industrialisation.

As economic uncertainty and technology reshape global value chains, developing economies that invest in production capabilities – and implement smart industrial policies – will be best placed to harness opportunities. In some cases, friendshoring may even allow them to leapfrog into more sophisticated activities faster than traditional development paths would allow.

For consumers, there are benefits too. The label on our next laptop, charger or T-shirt might change, but prices will remain broadly stable – at least before tariffs kick in. In this sense, globalisation will not disappear. But it will take on a different geographical shape.

Clive Michael Hartley took advantage of an underage girl then less than half his age and twice raped her, Judge Simon Hickey told York Crown Court.

She told the judge how the rapes had affected her life ever since and as a result she had become addicted to alcohol, depressed and at times suicidal.

“He has gone on to live his life, recognised as a local businessman and not taken responsibility for what he did,” she said in a personal statement.

“I don’t think he has given any thought about it from the day when it happened.”

Louise Reevell, prosecuting, said the girl, now a woman, finally broke her silence in 2024 and told police what had happened to her when she was a child.

Earlier this year, a York jury convicted Hartley, 68, of Troutsdale Avenue, Rawcliffe, of two charges of rape. He had denied the charges.

The victim said his denial had increased her trauma because she had had to give evidence against him.

“The two years between reporting him and it coming to trial very nearly broke me entirely,” the girl now a woman said in her personal statement.

“What he did to me as a child did not end then. It has affected every part of my life for decades. I am still dealing with the consequences today.

“He not only stole my childhood but a large chunk of my life ever since.”

The judge told Hartley: “You have taken clear advantage of her.”

His crimes had affected both the victim, those close to her and those close to Hartley, said the judge. Hartley is not related to the victim.

As he jailed Hartley for 14 years and put him on the sex offenders’ register for life, a supporter of Hartley was clearly distressed in the public gallery.

The victim said ever since the rapes happened the psychological effects had affected her in ways that she found difficult to put into words and were still affecting her today. They had also affected her relationships with other people.

“With justice served, I am hoping I can finally move on and live the life I was supposed to have,” she said.

Sarah Barlow, defending, said Hartley had not offended before or during the “very long period” after the rapes and handed in character references.

The said he was of “positive good character” and had succeeded as a businessman.

With visitors heading to York Racecourse for the first race meeting of the season later this month, North Yorkshire Police are urging the public to plan ahead and expect significant traffic and parking pressures on race days.

Recommended reading:

Officers are also encouraging racegoers to use official racecourse car parks and to be considerate of residents in nearby streets.

The Dante Festival is the fisrt race meeting of 2026 and takes place from Wednesday, May 13 to Friday, May 15 this year.

North Yorkshire Police said: “Avoid obstructive parking – please do not block driveways, junctions, or emergency access routes.

“Officers and traffic teams will be out on key dates to monitor parking and ensure road safety, and enforcement action may be taken where necessary.”

Visitors are advised that delays are likely before and after events, and alternative travel options should be considered where possible.

The force is reminding the public to plan their journeys in advance and to follow parking guidance to help keep race days safe and disruption to a minimum.

“It is disgusting, disgraceful and it is an insult to the innocent civil rights protesters who were murdered in Derry in January 1972”

The use of Bloody Sunday footage in a video posted online by Kemi Badenoch is “disgusting” and “disgraceful”, a Northern Irish MP has said.

The Conservative leader posted a video to her social media channels on Tuesday, in which she criticised the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill.

The video, which has now been removed from X and Facebook, featured footage of Mrs Badenoch speaking and was overlaid, in part, with archive clips of British soldiers.

At least one of the clips was identified by Foyle MP Colum Eastwood as having been filmed on Bloody Sunday.

Thirteen unarmed civilians were shot dead when members of the Army’s Parachute Regiment opened fire on civil rights demonstrators in the Bogside area of Londonderry on January 30 1972, which became known as Bloody Sunday.

The SDLP MP said in a statement: “I am shocked, frankly, that Kemi Badenoch has posted a video trumpeting the service of British soldiers in Northern Ireland using footage from Bloody Sunday.

“It is disgusting, disgraceful and it is an insult to the innocent civil rights protesters who were murdered in Derry in January 1972.”

In the video, Mrs Badenoch said Labour’s Bill will “drag” Troubles veterans back to court.

“It will put elderly veterans through fresh legal battles at the end of their lives,” she said.

Mrs Badenoch said her party will “vote to block” the legislation and “a future Conservative government will repeal it” and posted a link to a petition to stop the Bill.

The Northern Ireland Troubles Bill was designed to repeal and replace the controversial Legacy Act introduced by the previous Conservative government, ending the immunity scheme brought in under the law, which was ruled unlawful in the courts.

Mr Eastwood said the video is “entirely about elevating the interests of British soldiers over the needs of victims and survivors who have been forced to fight against the power and might of the British state for decades seeking truth, justice and accountability for their loved ones”.

In 2010, then Conservative prime minister David Cameron apologised to the families of the civil rights marchers killed on Bloody Sunday after the Saville Inquiry found all were innocent.

Mr Eastwood said: “We’re a long way away from former prime minister David Cameron’s powerful apology for the actions of soldiers on that day.”

The Conservative Party has been approached for comment.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

Pop star Dua Lipa is not expected to perform at the heavyweight bout between Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury later this year.

Britons Joshua, 36, and Fury, 37, have agreed terms for a long-awaited all-British contest targeted for the end of 2026.

However, Saudi Arabia’s General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki Al-Sheikh had suggested the fight could be jeopardised if Dua Lipa did not agree to perform as part of the event’s promotion.

It is unclear whether the remark was made in earnest or in jest, but BBC Sport understands the 30-year-old singer was approached about performing but declined the offer, and is not expected to be involved in the event.

Dua Lipa is one of the world’s most successful pop artists, with global hits including New Rules, Don’t Start Now and Levitating.

A venue for Fury v Joshua has yet to be finalised, although Wembley Stadium in October is understood to be the preferred option for organisers.