Source link

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

As soon as the sun comes out, kids want to run, splash, and frolic around outside – it’s only natural.

And while it’s far easier to keep them occupied when there’s exploring to be done, the one inevitable struggle is finding a sun cream that they’ll let you apply, let alone one that doesn’t break them out in a horrible rash.

Then there’s the sun protection factor to think about, and whether they’ll be able to splash around without getting horribly burnt. It’s a minefield!

Advertisement

To save you from having to deal with weeks of scratching and spending unfathomable amounts of money testing different formulas out, we’ve asked a paediatric dermatologist how to choose a kids’ sunscreen, and found 11 of the best to shop now.

What to consider when buying kids’ sun cream

There are plenty of budget options for kids’ sunscreen on the market. And while you might think the only important factor is whether or not they burn, there is actually a lot that goes into making a good kids’ sunscreen.

Whether you’re looking for a sensitive-skin specific lotion, or one that’ll endure countless trips in the pool, Dr Bisola Laguda, paediatric dermatologist and spokesperson for the Skin Health Alliance shares what to look for in a kids’ sunscreen.

Advertisement

SPF rating

“When picking a sunscreen, the Skin Health Alliance recommends picking one with an SPF of 50+,” he says. “A factor this high helps counteract UVB (the rays that cause burning) most effectively.”

Broad spectrum

“Look for sunscreens that have ‘broad spectrum’ protection,” Laguda says. “This means that the sunscreen will absorb the UVA rays linked to long-term skin damage. Keep an eye out for the UVA star rating on sunscreen packaging – the more stars, the more protection the product offers.“

Advertisement

However, avoid products with a high UVA star rating and a lower SPF, Laguda notes, as this weakens protection.

Higher SPF and broad spectrum sunscreens can also be good for kids with sensitive skin, he adds: “Their skin reacts more quickly to UV damage and is more susceptible to speedy burning as well as long-term damage.”

Water-resistant

“There is no such thing as waterproof sunscreen, but you can find water-resistant options – ideal for children taking a dip in the sea or splashing in an outdoor pool,” Laguda explains.

Advertisement

“These work by creating a hydrophobic barrier that repels water and keeps the sun-protecting ingredients locked behind it. That being said, it’s also important to continually top up on sunscreen after extended periods of swimming or sweating.”

Ingredients to look for in kids’ sunscreen

While each child will be different, finding a sunscreen that protects your kiddo from the sun and also takes care of their skin can be tricky. There are certain ingredients to look out for, or avoid, in kids’ sun cream, according to Laguda.

Mineral

Advertisement

If your kid has sensitive skin, mineral sunscreen is your best bet, Laguda explains.

“The mineral contents – often zinc oxide or titanium dioxide – sit on top of the skin and reflect the UV rays,” he says. “This is often a more preferable option over chemical sunscreens, which penetrate the skin and absorb the rays, leading to potential irritation.“

Fragrance-free

These can also be good for kids with sensitive skin, Laguda adds. “The immune system can react to the chemical compounds in fragrance as if they were foreign invaders, and trigger a response that sets contact dermatitis symptoms in motion,” he says.

Advertisement

Patch testing a sunscreen can also prevent unwanted reactions, Laguda explains. “Apply the sunscreen to a clean, hidden area – such as the inner elbow or behind the knee – and check for any reactions over the next 24 hours. If any reactions do occur, it’s best to wash the product off immediately but gently.”

Best kids’ sunscreens to shop now

With these factors in mind, we’ve found 11 of the best sunscreens for kids to stock up on before summer arrives.

This Aussie-based brand doesn’t use octinoxate or oxybenzone in its formula, which not only makes it reef safe but protects your little ones with rash-prone skin. It also has a clever colour-changing cap, which tells you when there’s a high UV as a reminder to top up.

This formula from Thinkbaby is free from harmful chemicals, and ticks both the 50+ SPF and broad spectrum UVA boxes. Plus, iHerb has a buy one, get one 50% off deal on sunscreen running right now, so now is your time to stock up.

Suncream is boring – it requires a break from running around. But when it smells like tangerine and vanilla, that’s a real negotiation tactic. This one is only SPF 40, though, so maybe ideal for cloudier days.

This paediatrician sunscreen is completely plant-based, and it’s sensitive skin approved. It doesn’t have a smell, and spreads easily, which makes it easy as for doing a quick application on your wriggling baby.

Another way around feeling like you’re in a competitive sunscreen applying competition is this spray-on formula from Garnier. It doesn’t leave a white cast or marks on clothing, but just make sure you’re applying enough as it can be easy to miss a spot.

This E45 duo covers sun protection for the whole family, with a 50+ SPF spray for your kids and a 30+ SPF squeezy bottle for you. Easy!

For kids with extra sensitive skin, this La Roche-Posay formula comes highly recommended. It’s not only loaded with thermal water, vitamin A and shea butter, which hydrates the skin without leaving it feeling greasy, but it also offers long and short UVA and UVB protection for worry-proof protection.

Developed specifically for sports, Ultrasun is formulated with durability in mind. This cream isn’t sticky, and it is water-resistant so you can have peace of mind while they’re splashing around.

As if kids’ clothes weren’t expensive enough, when summer rolls around you have yellow sunscreen stains to contend with, too. This formula doesn’t leave those, thankfully, and it’s fast-absorbing, so they can be outdoors in no time. The only thing is the cap can be a little stiff and leaky.

Loaded with antioxidants and hydrating enzymes, this spray claims to strengthen the skin barrier, making it suitable for sensitive skin. It’s also been tested under dermatological and paediatric control, so you can trust that its range of UVB and UVA spectrum protection is legit.

This mineral sunscreen is organic, it smells like lavender, and it provides 98% protection from UVB rays. But if that’s not enough to convince you, this five start review might be.

“Our two year old toddler is seemingly allergic to every suncream under the sun, and would come up with horrific skin reactions,” one parent shares. “It stopped her from enjoying the sunshine or outdoors and it was heartbreaking to see. We have spent over a week in the sun, applying suncream three times daily, and her skin has never been clearer.” Sold!

Advertisement

Tips for protecting children from the sun

Unfortunately, it’s not enough to whack sunscreen on your little once in the morning and call it a day.

Kids are particularly sensitive to the sun, so we asked Laguda offers top tips on how to protect kids from the sun:

• Clothing: Dressing them in loose-fitting clothing is a great first step, as well as wide-brimmed hats to provide extra coverage for the back of the neck and ears.
• Shade: Finding a shady spot to shield from the UV rays is a great way to still enjoy the benefits of being outdoors while remaining sun safe.
• Reapply: Whether your sunscreen claims to be extended wear or not, you need to reapply throughout the day in two hour intervals for maximum protection.
  There are areas of the skin that are easy to miss, and sunscreen can rub off throughout the day, especially when swimming, sweating, or drying off with a towel.

Source link

The post Why the mainstream media is finished, with Andrew Gold appeared first on spiked.

Source link

The Labour party in Tameside, Greater Manchester, has been accused by opponents of introducing fake ‘independent’ candidates in this month’s local elections.

The veracity of these single-source claims could not be confirmed at the time of writing. However, if proven to be true, the scheme seems intent on splitting the vote of former Labour supporters. They left the party in protest of Starmer’s backing of Israel, perceived disregard of human rights, and its war on people in poverty.

Splitting the vote

The scheme, as reported by the Manchester Mill, is said to have been cooked up by a local Labour councillor. They reported that he had confided in whistleblower Philip Wilson-Marks at a boozy party hosted by Labour MP Angela Rayner. Moreover, the councillor had raised the idea before, Wilson-Marks said:

This idea remained important to Vimal. It was central to his tactics.

With less than a week to go until the elections, Labour is accused of putting the alleged scheme into practice, with one white and one Asian Muslim ‘Trojan horse’ — Marie Fairhurst and Muhammad Ali.

three other councillors have come out in supported of these allegations, as named by the Manchester Mill:

• Liam Billington, Tory councillor
• Kaleel Khan, independent councillor
• Ahmed Mahmood, independent candidate

The accusers say that Labour is trying to benefit its own candidate, Atta Ul-Rasool, a Rayner protégé. If true, such behaviour, according to guidelines published by the Electoral Commission, constitutes a serious case of electoral fraud — a criminal offense. According to local publication manchestermill:

It’s difficult to find any information about either of them. Neither has an online presence, and no one I speak to in the ward has seen them engaging in typical campaign activity, such as handing out flyers, door-knocking or putting up posters. There have been no social media posts or press engagements since their names were announced on April 10th. Neither appear to be active members of the community — nor does Fairhurst seem to live in it.

…a constituent could reasonably assume that Fairhurst and Ali are just two local people throwing their hats into the ring, trying to improve one of Tameside’s most hardened wards.

But politics in St Peter’s is widely viewed through two lenses: The war in Gaza, and Tameside Labour’s recent scandals (among them, Angela Rayner’s resignation as Deputy PM, and the ‘Trigger me Timbers’ WhatsApp group). Both look unkindly on Labour, the borough’s governing party.

Advertisement

If they even exist, do they even know their names are on election papers?

Old trick, new names

The invention of fictitious candidates to split votes is an old trick.

In the 2024 general election, ‘Reform UK’ fielded a number of ‘ghost’ candidates that divided the Tory vote in seats that Labour consequently won.

No one has been prosecuted and the exact number of ‘ghosts’ is unclear. However, Starmer’s 2024 majority was 86 seats. Reform came second in 89 seats won by Labour. This enabled Starmer to ‘win’ a ‘landslide’. Yet he received considerably fewer votes than Corbyn achieved in either 2017 or the ‘disaster’ 2019 general election.

The truth of the allegations may take a police investigation to establish. But the St Peter’s ward has five candidates on the ballot paper for the May 2026 general elections. Three of them are ‘independents’ when only one of them may actually be independent.

Labour’s desperation in the face of the Polanski Green surge has already seen party bosses and their allies mount smear campaigns. They aim to nobble or remove Green candidates that threaten its hold. If the allegations are true, the Starmer regime is also targeting independents. It may not just be in Tameside.

Featured image via the Manchester Mill

By Skwawkbox

Source link

The post Golders Green: how Jews are being terrorised appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Take Back Power supporters have been occupying the playgrounds of the wealthy again on the morning of 1 May. And they’ve ‘liberated’ items from a superstore to redistribute them back to the communities that need them. Take Back Power is a nonviolent campaign, demanding a tax on extreme wealth, to be decided by a ‘House of the People’.

At around 9am, three Take Back Power supporters entered the Tesco Extra on Acre Lane in Brixton, took essential items from the shelves and left without paying. The action takers then donated the items at a local food-bank drop-off point. At around 10am, all three attempted to hand themselves in at Brixton Police Station. So far none have been arrested.

Take Back Power carried out a similar action in four UK cities in March.

At 11.45am, a further 18 Take Back Power supporters occupied the luxury department store Liberty, on Regent Street in London. They could held signs which read ‘3 MILLION HOUSEHOLDS SKIPPING MEALS’ and ‘TAX THE SUPER-RICH NOW.’

At around 1pm, this group then reconvened, disrupting access to the luxury hotel Claridges. The group chanted “WE DEMAND EQUALITY!’ and ‘HOW DO WE TAX THE SUPER RICH? – A HOUSE OF THE PEOPLE!’ as security attempted to move the supporters away from the door.

A Take Back Power spokesperson said:

Take Back Power is calling for an emergency ‘House of the People’ to deal with the cost of living crisis. When politicians are too busy lining their pockets to fix our problems, we need the people most impacted to have a seat at the table.

A House of the People selected by democratic lottery, like a jury, is a no-brainer solution to cut out the corruption and decide how to redistribute wealth.

Take Back Power supporters explain the action

One of those taking action redistributing food today, Moshe Dixon, 25, from Dundee, said:

My mother came from poverty and fought tooth and nail to give me a better future. Like so many mothers she was promised that hard work would be rewarded, yet we are living in a country where so many families can’t make ends meet despite working multiple jobs.

6.5 million people had to turn to foodbanks in 2024. Meanwhile the CEO of Tesco is taking home 430 times the pay of the average Tesco employee, and the rich are paying a smaller share of tax than working people.

Also taking action today, occupying high-end stores and hotels, was Hannah McDonald, 20, a student from Liverpool, who said:

14 million people last year were faced with the prospect of going hungry, in this, the sixth richest nation on earth! Now we have a cost of living tsunami on the way and the government is nowhere to be seen.

This is broken Britain. We need a House of the People – an assembly with real power, where ordinary mums, nurses, posties & cleaners, get a real say in how to take back our power from the super rich, and redistribute that wealth and power back to working people.

The actions come as the UK braces for food shortages and soaring prices as a result of Trump and Netanyahu’s war on Iran. Rising fuel, fertiliser and commodity prices are beginning to feed into business costs.

Take Back Power says it’s time to take on the super-rich who are profiteering from a world in crisis. This is why it’s demanding that the UK government establishes an emergency House of the People – a citizen’s assembly chosen by democratic lottery, that has the power to tax extreme wealth and fix the UK.

Until the government makes a meaningful statement in response to this demand, the group says it will undertake nonviolent action to resist the super-rich, who are driving us towards social collapse. Donate or sign up to take action at TakeBackPower.net.

Featured image via Take Back Power

By The Canary

Source link

Independents in the London borough of Ealing have been “making a breakthrough” as support for the Labour Party there is tanking. Labour currently dominates in Ealing, but Ealing Community Independents (ECI) leader, Craig Smith, told the Canary:

The number of people who are willing to admit on the doorstep that they’re voting Labour is breathtakingly low. Single percentage figures… So I know that things are going to look very different on May 8th.

Building “a credible alternative to Ealing Labour”

He compared the credentials of these independent and Labour councillors and what they stand for, saying:

None of the people that are going to be candidates for Ealing Community Independents are career politicians. None of them have been councillors before […] Essentially, all of our members are part of local residents’ associations. We have people who lead litter picking campaigns. We have people who are recognised community champions.

So they all do something as community organisers above and beyond just wanting to become councillors. Because, honestly, that’s been part of the problem with Ealing Labour Council over the years – 16 years now of councillors just doing it because they enjoy the status but they don’t want to get their hands dirty. They don’t actually want to be seen between the elections.

In waging an campaign led by independents to remove Labour’s majority on Ealing Council, he insisted that:

It’s the largest ever attempt by a new party or a grouping of independents to do this.

Their efforts to offer local voters “a credible alternative to Ealing Labour” include a key promise not to cut public services.

Labour has consistently “cut back on crucial services,” Smith lamented, with numerous children’s centres “up for the chop” last year. He stressed that independents would “reverse” that policy.

In short, ECI’s position is that, if their candidates are in charge:

you won’t see any cuts or closures or privatisations to frontline vital services [adding that] more than 20% of the working population is earning below the London Living Wage.

And to fight back against that, ECI councillors would work:

to make sure that all of the local employers are paying at least the London Living Wage to their employees

Holding housing developers to account

Smith also highlighted the need for more “affordable housing” which ECI is pushing for.

He explained why the current situation needs to end, and what ECI would do to deal with it:

As with many councils, Ealing Labour Council makes promises every year that it consistently breaks in terms of new house building and the number of affordable units that go into the developments that they’ve given planning approval to…

Essentially, planning approval is given for a major developer to throw up a block of flats. They agree to a certain ratio of affordable housing and then, almost inevitably, by the time that development is finished, they renege on the promise and say ‘it’s no longer affordable, costs have gone up, we can’t afford to do that’, and they reduce the number of units.

So literally every year, Ealing Council come back and say ‘oh, we haven’t hit our target’. And they don’t seem to be at all embarrassed about it.

So one of the things that we are sort of committing to do is to hold the developers to their initial obligation… I think the public and the developers need to know that we are serious when they make a commitment and they get an approval in the first place, that we expect affordable and social housing to go into those developments.

You can see all of ECI’s policies and positions here.

Ealing deserves better

Labour’s tanking support in Ealing is, in part, due to councillors being so disconnected from residents. As Smith asserted:

The thing that we hear most consistently is how angry they are at the lack of responsiveness from their councillors.

These independents have been making it clear to residents that unlike Labour, they put the voices of ordinary people at the heart of what they do. One key question when canvassing is whether people have heard of ECI. And though it’s a new party, Smith notes that:

Increasingly, people are saying yes. So it’s definitely working. We’re making a breakthrough.

ECI has also received the endorsement of Your Party. And it has been strategic too, having positive conversations with the local Green Party. As Smith clarified:

We agreed not to stand in three of their highest priority wards.

However, the green part, as he noted:

have pressure from above, from the central party, to field candidates, as many as possible, across all of the wards… So they are fielding candidates in our wards.

Greens have not been actively campaigning in ECI target wards, though.

Cooperative efforts between independents and Greens are entirely possible, as the Hackney campaign this year has shown. But as numerous independents around the country have told us, the national Green Party seems to be gauging where it can get significant support with minimal effort, and where it struggles — ahead of local elections.

Because of our highly problematic, anti-democratic voting system and obscenely wealthy individuals force-feeding Reform’s racist elitism — now is the time for change. To stop far-right Reform and an increasingly authoritarian Labour, Greens must work more collaboratively with independents.

Smith hopes this will happen after the local election, with parties to the left of Labour coming together to hold it to account.

Featured image via the Canary

By Ed Sykes

Source link

Source link

Source link

Source link