There was a major change of direction in the Premier League relegation battle this weekend and emotions are running high.
West Ham’s 3-0 thrashing at the hands of Brentford on Saturday opened the door for Tottenham and they accepted the invitation. Roberto De Zerbi’s side came out swinging on Sunday, racing into a 2-0 lead at Aston Villa before conceding a late consolation goal.
Spurs’ second straight win moved them one point ahead of the Hammers into 17th place with three games left to play. Tottenham were full of energy and good value for their win, yet Villa’s flat performance and third straight loss raised eyebrows.
With Villa fairly comfortable in fifth place and prioritising the second leg of their Europa League semi-final against Nottingham Forest, Unai Emery made seven changes to his side. That decision perhaps played into the hands of Spurs and, for some, raised questions of sporting integrity.
So was there something untoward about the scenes at Villa Park on Sunday? Or was it a simple case of squad rotation? Here the Mirror Football writers give their take on the issue.
JOIN US ON FACEBOOK! Latest news, analysis and much more on Mirror Football’s Facebook page
READ MORE: Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher in row over Man Utd’s title chances – ‘Don’t be kidded’READ MORE: Premier League cult hero suffers horror injury as game abandoned and wife shaken up
John Cross
Let’s be absolutely clear: Aston Villa’s so-called “performance” on Sunday night was probably the worst I’ve seen from a Premier League team this season. And yes, I’ve watched a lot of games. And if I’m Nottingham Forest or West Ham then I would be screaming: that stinks.
Tottenham were excellent. The best I’ve seen them play by far. They thoroughly deserved to win. But Villa did make it easy for them. They made seven changes. Would Spurs have won if Villa had not been playing the stiffs? Maybe. But the fact is we’ll never know.
We’ll never know whether in the second half a first teamer would be caught offside in Sunday League fashion at a short corner routine. Or whether they would have chased the ball Jadon Sancho gave up on. It’s clear he won’t be playing Thursday.
Here’s the thing. There’s more onus on relegation-threatened Forest to get a result at Chelsea on Monday. And that’s three days ahead of Forest’s Europa League semi final second leg at… you’ve guessed it: Aston Villa. Forest can’t rest any players. That’s why we’re using the word integrity.
West Ham sank into the bottom three after Villa rested seven players. How can that be right? During the game a contact from another club – with absolutely no skin in the game – messaged me about it. Could see it a mile off. Afterwards, an ex-player got in touch. “What about Forest?”
People in the game know the score. Emery will argue he’s within his rights to make changes. But my God, he’d be moaning if he was Forest boss. It’s not right.
Jeremy Cross
Unai Emery is the manager of Aston Villa. Which means he can pick whatever side he wants, for whatever game he wants. He is paid the big bucks to make decisions which are in the best interests of his team.
And if he thinks resting some of his stars will give Villa a better chance of overcoming Nottingham Forest in the semi finals of the Europa League this week, then so be it. Because if Villa can go on and win the Europa League, it will be a much bigger achievement than finishing in the top four.
Villa will have another European trophy to boast about, not to mention be in the Champions League. Emery is being selfish. Which makes all those complaining about him damaging the integrity of the Premier League, one of the greatest ironies of all. Because when it comes to the top flight of English football, every club takes care of itself at all costs.
James Whaling
Villa were awful. Abject. It happens. But the fact they made seven changes makes it seems a whole lot worse. Unai Emery picked a team flooded with internationals that was more than capable of beating a Spurs side languishing at the wrong end of the table.
Those who perhaps haven’t seen as much game time as they’d have liked this season had an opportunity to stake a claim and they wasted it. Emery knows what he’s doing. He’s won the Europa League four times before and Villa are favourites to give him a fifth.
The wider debate should probably be on the over saturation of football that made Emery deem it necessary to make such sweeping changes. This has only been brought into sharper focus because it affected Spurs and their bid to stay in the division and avoid what would be the biggest relegation in the history of the Premier League.
Emery doubtless did them a favour. But he shouldn’t have to answer to anybody.
Conor Mummery
This is not the first time a team has made changes for a Premier League game ahead of a big European tie, and it won’t be the last. It is, however, the first time a team with the opportunity to have a big hand in sending Tottenham Hotspur down to the Championship has done so.
West Ham fans are naturally unhappy about Emery’s selections given the result sent them back into the bottom three, but they were more understanding when David Moyes made six changes for the Hammers’ 2-1 defeat at Leicester back in 2023, 10 days before their Conference League triumph in Prague.
If Aston Villa had made similar changes for a match against Crystal Palace or Sunderland, it would’ve gone largely unnoticed in comparison. But fans want Spurs down. And it’s understandable. Seeing a ‘Big Six’ side in genuine danger of being relegated to the Championship is unprecedented and opposition supporters are naturally revelling in it.
Villa fielded as many regular starters in their line-up as Spurs did. The difference being the decision was taken out of Roberto De Zerbi’s hands given Tottenham’s ludicrous injury crisis. If fans want to criticise Emery’s players for a perceived lack of effort and having one eye on Thursday’s huge semi-final second leg against Nottingham Forest, that’s another debate. But to question the Villa manager’s integrity for rotating his team four days out from one of the club’s biggest games in the modern era is disingenuous at best.
Felix Keith
Oliver Glasner made five changes to his Crystal Palace side to face Bournemouth on Sunday. They were thrashed 3-0 and no-one seemed to mind, given the second leg of their Conference League semi-final against Shakhtar Donetsk is around the corner. “Bournemouth’s semi-final was today. Ours is Thursday,” Glasner admitted afterwards.
To my mind, the situation is exactly the same, it’s just that Palace weren’t playing a side involved in the relegation battle. But what makes it even more ridiculous is that, as Emery himself pointed out in his post-match interview, Villa had lost their last two matches ahead of facing Spurs.
Why shouldn’t Emery change things up after watching back-to-back 1-0 losses against Fulham in the league and Forest in the Europa League? It’s not like he put out a team of academy players. It’s a complete non-issue.
Nathan Ridley
I can understand why West Ham and Nottingham Forest fans might feel frustrated, but Aston Villa did nothing wrong. Unai Emery’s side have earned the right to prioritise the Europa League by giving themselves breathing room in fifth place.
If they get knocked out by Forest on Thursday and finish outside of the Champions League places, then questions can be asked. But not in relation to the relegation battle.
Whoever Villa were scheduled to play on Sunday would’ve faced a rotated team. The opposition happened to be Tottenham – just like when it was Brentford who got the benefit of facing a weakened West Ham XI between the Irons’ Conference League semi-final fixtures in 2023. It’s just how the cookie crumbles.
The only problem West Ham and Forest supporters should have is with their own results over the course of the whole season.
Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Sky Sports, HBO Max, Netflix and Disney+ with Ultimate TV package

Sky has upgraded its Ultimate TV and Sky Sports bundle to now include HBO Max, Netflix, Disney+, discovery+ and Hayu, as well as 135 channels and full Sky coverage of the Premier League and EFL.
Sky broadcasts more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more with at least 215 live from the top flight alongside Formula 1, darts and golf.












You must be logged in to post a comment Login