Keir Starmer is under pressure to crack down on online harms with fears children are continuing to face a wild west on social media on their phones and computers
Two-thirds of people support a social media ban for under 16s, a poll for The Mirror shows.
Keir Starmer is under pressure to crack down on online harms with fears children are continuing to face a wild west on their phones and computers. Some 66% of adults support banning under 16s from using social media, the Deltapoll finds, up from 64% when The Mirror ran a similar poll in December.
Women are slightly more likely to back a ban with 68% in support, compared to 63% of men. Some 67% of people who voted Labour in 2024 support a ban, while 77% of Tories do. And 58% of people who voted Reform UK in 2024 back a ban – despite Nigel Farage being in favour of going the opposite direction and scrapping online safety laws for kids.
READ MORE: Bereaved mum issues social media ban for kids plea ahead of fresh Lords clash
The Government has said it does not want to rush into an outright social media ban, with some campaigners warning it could be a flawed solution to the online crisis. Ministers have instead launched a consultation on a range of online safety features, including an outright ban for under 16s, overnight curfews or app caps.
It will also look at strengthening age verification measures by restricting kids’ access to VPNs, which allow youngsters to circumvent the rules. More than 60,000 people have responded to the consultation so far, which will conclude in the summer.
Some bereaved parents and campaigners warn there is no time or need for more evidence-gathering when the harms are already known. But others warn an outright ban could push young people into darker spaces online.
Pressure on the Government to take action has mounted after Australia’s ban for under 16s came into force in December. Other European countries including Spain and Greece have indicated similar plans. Amid pressure from the House of Lords to ban social media for under 16s, Education Minister Olivia Bailey last week pledged “some form of age or functionality restrictions”.
Early research from Australia’s ban shows children are circumventing the rules with three in five (61%) 12 to 15 year-olds still accessing one or more accounts on restricted platforms in the country. And studies in the UK show kids are getting around age checks by using fake birthdays, shared accounts, altered photos and even drawing on false moustaches.
Ofcom ordered social media firms to enforce robust age checks – such as credit card checks or facial recognition technology – as part of the implementation of the Online Safety Act last summer. Most social media platforms allow children aged 13 and above to create an account.
Bereaved mum Ellen Roome, whose son Julian “Jools” Sweeney took his own life in 2022, said the Mirror’s poll results showed the public wants “strong and decisive action” from the government. Ms Roome, who is suing TikTok with other bereaved families, believes her 14-year-old son’s death may be connected to an online challenge.
She told The Mirror: “As a mother who lost my 14-year-old son Jools, I have seen first-hand the devastating consequences of an online world that is not designed with children’s safety at its core. Children are currently allowed access to highly addictive platforms and harmful content without the safeguards we would expect in any other area of life.
“This is why I support raising the age for access to harmful social media platforms to 16. It is not about punishing children or stopping them socialising. It is about giving them time to develop safely and protecting them during some of the most vulnerable years of their lives. Parents across the UK want the Government to get on with raising the age of harmful social media to 16, and they want that action now.”
But Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, a charity named after schoolgirl Molly Russell who took her own life aged 14, warned a ban could offer a “false sense of security”. He told The Mirror: “Parents have been let down time and again by tech companies that put profit before safety and successive Government’s failure to prioritise protecting children online.
“It’s no surprise that parents rightly want action but we must go further than a blanket ban that will offer them a false sense of safety. Instead decisive new laws must force tech companies to fix their products and make child safety and wellbeing the price for doing business in the UK.”
A Government spokesman said: “We’ve been clear that we will take action to make sure children have a healthy relationship with social media. This isn’t a question of whether, but how we will act. Our consultation is looking at everything from age limits and safer design features to a social media ban, as well as pilots with hundreds of UK families, to ensure we take the best approach, based on the latest evidence.
“We know parents and children want us to act fast, and through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act we have taken new legal powers to do exactly that – so we can move quickly once the consultation concludes.”
::: Deltapoll surveyed 3,353 adults in Great Britain between April 26 and May 1 for The Mirror.


You must be logged in to post a comment Login