WASHINGTON — A little over a year after President Donald Trump scolded him during a nationally televised Oval Office meeting, insisting he held “no cards,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is proving he holds a few after all.
Setbacks for Trump ally and Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and the world’s newfound appreciation for Ukraine’s drone-focused defense industry have given Zelenskyy a remarkable reversal of fortune and a much stronger position than Trump could have predicted 14 months ago.
In Moscow on Saturday, Putin, who expected to take control of Ukraine within days of his 2022 invasion, will instead oversee a Victory Day parade that is drastically scaled down out of fear of Ukrainian long-range drones and missiles. Russian airports were closed in the preceding days and cell service periodically shut off as security measures. Putin himself has cut back on public appearances over fears of assassination attempts or even a coup.
On the same day, 1,000 miles to the southwest, Putin’s biggest defender in Europe, Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orbán, will officially hand over power to a new prime minister, Peter Magyar, whose election last month has already opened the door to more European Union and NATO help for Ukraine.
Advertisement
“Great split screen,” said Fiona Hill, a Russia expert who served in Trump’s first-term National Security Council, of the simultaneous illustrations of Putin’s misfortunes.
Zelenskyy’s Ukraine, meanwhile, has essentially stopped or even reversed Russia’s advance in the eastern Donbas region with an increasingly lethal drone industry. It is striking deep into Russia to hit military and oil infrastructure, cutting defense production deals and further integrating its economy with Western Europe, selling cheap anti-drone interceptors to Gulf states under attack from Iran — all while Zelenskyy travels easily among European and world capitals to build support for Ukraine’s cause.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks to the media ahead of an informal meeting of the European Council on April 23, 2026.
NICOLAS TUCAT via Getty Images
“Ukraine seems to be getting stronger, and Putin seems to be under increasing economic and demographic pressure, maybe even possible unrest, at home,” said Jim Townsend, a former Pentagon official and now an analyst at the Center for a New American Security. “So it seems Ukraine may be taking on an advantage.”
In a White House meeting barely a month after returning to office, Trump infamously chastised Zelenskyy for having been invaded by Russia three years earlier and for continuing to ask for assistance from the United States. “You’re either going to make a deal, or we’re out, and if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty,” Trump told him. “You don’t have the cards.”
Advertisement
Trump, who has long admired Putin, early on called the dictator’s invasion of Ukraine “genius” and “savvy.” If he had hoped to help the accused war criminal by cutting off Ukraine from any further US military aid, though, the opposite appears to have happened. Ukraine instead sought and received even more military help from Western Europe, which sees Russia as a direct threat, while simultaneously stepping up its own domestic production of weapons.
Ukraine’s small battlefield drones have effectively created a stalemate at the front lines in the eastern part of the country, with Russian advances coming only at great cost. Zelenskyy estimated Tuesday that Russia had seen 35,000 of its soldiers killed or wounded last month, exceeding its ability to replace them. Ukraine’s long-range drones and new “Flamingo” cruise missiles, meanwhile, have been striking Russian military factories, oil loading ports and refineries — attacks that Zelenskyy describes as “sanctions” Ukraine is now unilaterally imposing against Putin.
Trump wooed Putin to a “summit” in Alaska last summer, claiming he would emerge with a ceasefire, but instead got nothing. Since then, he has taken to “both-sidesing” the conflict, never acknowledging that Putin’s invasion started it, and has repeatedly said he cannot understand why Putin and Zelenskyy do not get along.
Despite this, Putin still sees Trump as the best means of forcing Ukraine to cede territory so he can end the war on Russian terms, said Tatiana Stanvaya, a Moscow native and a Russia analyst at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin. Putin appears to be biding his time, she said, as Trump continues his war against Iran, with the hopes he will eventually turn his attention back to Ukraine.
Advertisement
“Putin needs a deal, but on his conditions,” she said, adding that she does not believe that Ukraine’s longer-range attacks will make Putin reconsider the war. “I don’t think it will make him change his mind… It’s a big question who can stand longer: Zelenskyy or Putin.”
But if Putin is counting on Trump to reengage on the Ukraine war, he is miscalculating, said John Bolton, one of Trump’s first-term national security advisers. “I think Trump just wants to stay away from Ukraine. He sees the whole issue as a loser for himself,” he said.
Trump’s White House did not respond to HuffPost queries.
Russia has held its traditional, full-on May 9 Victory Day parade, marking the World War II defeat of Nazi Germany, in Moscow each of the last four years since Putin’s February 2022 invasion. This year, though, with Ukraine possessing the ability to hit targets even beyond Russia’s capital, Putin has downsized it. The parade will not feature heavy military hardware like tanks or missiles and will have fewer troops.
Advertisement
“They fear drones may buzz over Red Square,” Zelenskyy, a former professional comedian, said Monday at a conference of European leaders in Armenia. “This is telling. It shows they are not strong now.”
“I think Trump just wants to stay away from Ukraine. He sees the whole issue as a loser for himself.”
– John Bolton, first-term national security adviser for Trump
Putin even proposed a two-day ceasefire covering May 9. Zelenskyy countered with a ceasefire starting at midnight on May 5, with an offer to keep the fighting stopped for as long as Russia abided by it as a precursor to a permanent peace agreement. Putin responded to the offer with a wave of even deadlier missile and drone attacks against Ukrainian civilian targets than normal, including a strike on a kindergarten in Sumy. A total of 27 Ukrainians were killed.
“It is obvious to any reasonable person that a full-scale war and the daily murdering of people are a bad time for public ‘celebrations,’” Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post Wednesday. “As of today, we can confirm that the Russian side has disrupted the ceasefire regime. Based on the evening reports from our military and intelligence, we will decide on our further actions.”
Advertisement
That Putin felt the need to beg Ukraine not to attack his parade has led some European governments to wonder if there is even less to Russia’s military might than has been assumed of late. “This is a pretty clear message that he’s weaker than most of the world is thinking he is,” Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna told CNN on Wednesday.
As for Orbán, after years of serving as Putin’s most reliable defender in the European Union and NATO, the Christian nationalist leader is stepping down after last month’s walloping by voters enraged that his cronyism and corruption had materially made their own lives more expensive and difficult. He is leaving the Hungarian parliament altogether and reportedly planning to travel to the United States.
His successor, Peter Magyar, has vowed to hold investigations into the misuse of public money during Orbán’s years. He has already opened dialogue with Zelenskyy and allowed a $106 billion loan from the EU that had been blocked by Orbán to proceed.
Townsend, who also worked at the US office at NATO, said Zelenskyy’s work to broaden his support and Europe’s efforts to build up their own defenses mean that Trump has less leverage over Ukraine than ever.
Advertisement
“If Trump abandons Ukraine, there would not be as big a blow as in years past. Europe is swinging heavily in support of Ukraine. They finally get the existential threat to Europe if Ukraine can’t hold the Russians back,” he said. “The United States doesn’t provide much assistance anyway and Ukraine manufactures more and more of its own equipment and has industrial partners in Europe to help. The only thing lost is the US diplomatic effort, which is pro-Russia anyway and is coercive against Ukraine’s interests.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
A defence barrister is facing contempt-of-court proceedings after allegedly inviting a jury to act according to their consciences. Rajiv Menon KC was acting for Palestine Action activists, who had been charged with aggravated burglary for damaging the property of Elbit Systems, an Israeli arms manufacturer, near Bristol in August 2024. During their first trial at Woolwich Crown Court in January, at which they were acquitted (although, in a re-trial this week, four people were convicted on lesser charges of criminal damage), the trial judge had ruled that the barristers could not invite the jury to disregard his legal rulings. He also directed them not to invite the jury to acquit ‘on the basis of their conscience’.
In his closing address in January, Menon allegedly told the jurors that they could acquit according to their conscience, relying on Bushell’s Case from 1670, which is ordinarily recognised as having established the independence of the jury. He quoted a plaque at the Old Bailey stating that Bushell’s Case ‘established the right of juries to give their verdict according to their convictions’.
There is, of course, nothing in our constitution that expressly protects the right of a jury to completely abandon the evidence. But juries can, and sometimes do, return verdicts that appear to cut against the evidence or the strict application of the law. This is possible because of a combination of legal rules and constitutional traditions that protect juries’ independence.
Advertisement
Bushell’s Case arose after a judge imprisoned a jury for refusing to return the verdict he wanted. There is plenty of argument about the applicability of that case to modern trials, but it at least established that jurors cannot be punished for their verdicts. It is also unlawful, because of separate rules, to enquire into the reasons for a jury’s decision. This means that even if we suspect that a jury has acted contrary to the evidence, there is no proper way to prove it. That combination of rules and traditions shows how hallowed the jury’s verdict is in our system.
That is a good thing. The whole point of a jury is to allow the wider community to participate in the justice system, free from the pressure of the institutions conducting the proceedings.
That is why these contempt proceedings are chilling. Without commenting on the individual case, lawyers should be able to draw a jury’s attention to its independence, the importance of its judgment and the fact that its verdict is ultimately its own. A jury should never be reduced to a rubber-stamping exercise. We should not be afraid of juries bringing the morals of wider society into the courtroom, including by refusing to convict where they cannot, in conscience, do so.
Advertisement
Juries have always brought morality into proceedings. In the United States, jurors famously refused to convict people accused of helping enslaved people escape – a practice widely thought to have contributed to the end of slavery. In England, during the 18th and 19th centuries, the criminal law made many offences punishable by death, including minor property crimes. This became known as the ‘Bloody Code’. Jurors frequently refused to convict defendants, thereby sparing them from the gallows.
More recently, juries have returned what look like perverse verdicts in cases involving political protest, free speech and the limits of criminal liability. These cases allow the black-letter law to be tested against public morality. That is not a defect in the jury system. It is one of its essential democratic functions.
Advertisement
So, solidarity with Rajiv Menon KC. The proceedings against him should concern anyone who believes that the justice system should remain democratically accountable through our juries.
Luke Gittos is a spiked columnist and author. His most recent book is Human Rights – Illusory Freedom: Why We Should Repeal the Human Rights Act, which is published by Zero Books. Order it here.
As you age, your go-to sex positions might not age as gracefully alongside you. After decades of showing off your flexibility in bed, you may notice as you enter your 70s that your joints ache, your back hurts and you maybe can’t bend as easily as before.
Arthritis and other age-related conditions may also come into play – issues that likely didn’t affect you when you were younger. Not to mention there’s the age-old (no pun intended) myth that your sex life somehow “ends” after a certain age.
“Body image shifts, loss of a long-term partner and deeply internalised ageism are among the biggest barriers to intimacy after 70,” Alicia Sinclair, sex educator, founder and CEO of Le Wand, told HuffPost.
“Sexual desire doesn’t have an expiration date, and neither does the need for connection and pleasure. Open communication with a partner – being explicit about what feels good and what doesn’t – often leads to greater intimacy than couples experienced in earlier years.”
Advertisement
Arthritis and other conditions may affect sex as you age.
Which means sex isn’t off the table after 70. Instead, it simply requires more adaptability and a better understanding of what works and what doesn’t.
Below is a list of sex positions that can become risky or uncomfortable after 70, – and expert-backed advice for what to try instead.
Traditional missionary (particularly for the bottom partner)
“This one catches people off guard,” according to Annette Benedetti, sex and intimacy coach and host of the podcast Talk Sex With Annette.
“Seventy-five percent of hip fractures happen in women, and bone density takes a nosedive after menopause. [The top partner’s] weight pressing down on [the bottom partner’s] hips and pelvis during missionary is exactly the kind of sustained force that can snap a fragile femur. Add vaginal atrophy and deep thrusting from above, and you’re also looking at vaginal tears and bleeding.”
Advertisement
Adds Sinclair: “Lying flat with a partner’s weight on top can compress the spine and make it difficult to breathe, especially for anyone with osteoporosis, spinal stenosis or limited hip mobility.”
Instead, Sinclair recommends using a wedge or positioning pillow under the hips to reduce lumbar strain or shifting to a side-lying position that keeps the spine in a neutral position.
Benedetti suggests flipping the dynamic with a modified cowgirl position, with the receiving partner on top, sitting upright on their partner’s lap or kneeling. “[The kneeling position] is what orthopaedic specialists recommend for women with osteoporosis. She controls the depth, the pace, and the pressure goes through his body, not hers.”
Doggy style (kneeling)
Advertisement
“Sustained kneeling puts significant pressure on the knees and wrists, and the position can destabilise the lower back,” Sinclair said. “For anyone with knee replacements, arthritis or balance issues, it’s a real injury risk.”
Benedetti adds that rear-entry positions with deep thrusting may also become uncomfortable over time. “With age – especially after menopause or other hormonal changes – internal tissues can become shorter, thinner and more sensitive. What once felt pleasurable can start to feel uncomfortable or even painful, with a higher risk of irritation or small tears.”
As an alternative, Sinclair recommends a supported standing variation, where one partner leans over a bed or cushioned surface, keeping weight off the knees entirely.
Another option is spooning. “You get a similar rear-entry angle and sense of closeness, but the receiving partner can control depth by adjusting their leg position,” Benedetti said. “It also removes pressure from the knees, wrists and shoulders, making it a much more comfortable choice overall.”
Advertisement
Halfpoint Images via Getty Images
Adapting your favorite sex positions to your body and your comfort is the right choice at every age.
Legs up over shoulders positions
“This position demands hip flexion that older joints often can’t handle safely, especially for people with hip replacements or conditions like arthritis,” Benedetti said. “It can also create very deep penetration at a time when tissues may be more sensitive. That’s a challenging combination.”
The better option? Reclining with a pillow wedge under the hips. Keep the knees bent and slightly apart, with the hips gently elevated to achieve a similar angle — without putting excess strain on the joints. This allows for better alignment and comfort while reducing orthopaedic risk.
Cowgirl / reverse cowgirl (on top)
Advertisement
“This requires quad strength, hip flexibility and balance – all of which decline with age,” Sinclair said. “A fall or sudden movement can cause hip fractures or knee injuries, which are among the most serious fall-related injuries in older adults.”
If you’re keen on doing the position, Sinclair recommends using a supported seated straddle – sitting face-to-face in a sturdy chair or using a dedicated intimate machine like The Cowgirl with a low, stable platform, which distributes weight differently and reduces fall risk dramatically.
Standing sex
“Balance and bone density both decline after 70, and the one-year mortality rate after a hip fracture sits around 25%,” Benedetti said. “A fall during sex isn’t a punchline; it’s a serious event.”
Advertisement
What can you do instead? Benedetti suggests using a sturdy armchair. One partner sits while the other straddles. Face-to-face, full-body contact – all the closeness without the risk of a fall.
Sex might look and feel different in your 70s than it did in previous decades, but it doesn’t mean it has to feel less pleasurable. With a better understanding of the body’s changing needs, couples can adapt their sex life rather than give up on it.
On Sky News this morning, Phillips said: “The smart money says the prime minister won’t be winkled out of Downing Street, but the vultures are circling.”
Advertisement
In a powerful monologue, Phillips added: “On May 7 the British people spoke, and they were brutal. They gave Nigel Farage a fighting force of nearly 1,500 councillors. They boosted [Green Party leader] Zack Polanski’s ranks by getting on for another 500.
“They put leaders in Edinburgh and Cardiff who ultimately want to break up the UK.
“What they said to Sir Keir Starmer was unambiguous: we think your government is a massive letdown, we really can’t see the point of your party and what’s more we really don’t like you very much either.
“The Labour Party is in chaos, with a backbencher threatening to trigger a leadership contest, and several of Starmer’s cabinet members jostling to replace him.
Advertisement
“The prime minister is going to respond tomorrow in what we are promised is a major speech. To rescue his leadership he’ll need something a bit more persuasive than his initial response on Friday morning, which amounted to ‘yes I made mistakes, the biggest of which is not to tell people frequently enough and loudly enough that everything I’ve done is right’.
“It’s quite hard to imagine voters in Barnsley or Hartlepool or Thurrock, where Labour were swept away by Reform, turning to their friends and crying ’if only I’d known they’d bring back Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman, I’d definitely have voted for Keir instead of Nigel.
“The prime minister is signalling frantically that he plans to keep going. He talked about being set for a 10 year run. But for all the stirring words and the bravado, this weekend he seems to me, and to many others, to be a man who is not waving, but drowning.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
And now, gardener and author Simon Akeroyd has shared that when it comes time to water your soil – especially if it has seedlings or freshly-sown seeds – a spoon could be your secret weapon.
How can a spoon help me to water my plants better?
In an Instagram post, he said that watering soil can help new seeds germinate, but doing so over a large area can be tiring “if you only have a watering can with no attachment”.
Advertisement
Removable heads that attach to the nozzle of your watering can, like “rose” style sprinkler heads, can make the process faster and ensure the even distribution of water.
You can get similar results with various hose attachments, the gardener added.
But, Akeroyd continued, “my tip for a wider distribution of watering is to attach a spoon to the end of your nozzle”.
That way, when you tip the can forward, water fans out from the bowl of the spoon rather than streaming in a straight line.
This is especially useful for “broadcast sowing”, Akeroyd continued, stating that “Seeds that you might broadcast sow include mustard, green manures, lawn seed, wildflowers, etc.”
Any other tips?
Yes. Akeroyd said in his clip that if you live in the UK, another way to water pre-seed soil is to simply wait for the rain to come.
Advertisement
Even if you’re using a watering can, this may still be sage advice.
Rainwater is significantly better for your plants than water from the tap, partly because its slightly acidic nature allows it and its nutrients to reach your plants’ roots sooner.
It is a little dirtier, but that’s no bad thing. The Ecological Landscape Alliance (ELA) said that a bit of grime in your water works “like a light application of fertiliser”.
Per experts from Berkeley Psychiatrists, that’s partly because signs of ADHD often go missed or misdiagnosed in adults, “especially women”.
They added, “In practice, many women are labelled as anxious, overwhelmed or disorganised, rather than their experiences being recognised as ADHD. There’s also pressure to appear organised and in control, so people develop ways of coping that can mask the condition”.
Advertisement
Whatever your gender, they shared some possible ADHD-related patterns that can go under the radar, “particularly when symptoms don’t match traditional expectations”:
1) Seeming to “cope well”, despite being burnt out
This can look like “high-achievers relying on rigid systems or overworking,” the experts said.
Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, consultant psychiatrist Dr Stefan Ivantu of the ADHD specialist said: “signs of ADHD are frequently misinterpreted as burnout in undiagnosed adults… The exhaustion often comes from the immense effort required to fit in and function in a neurotypical environment, [like] the average workplace.”
Advertisement
2) Less visible hyperactivity
Not all hyperactivity involves physical fidgeting, the experts said. It can include an “overactive mind rather than physical restlessness”.
“One of the main issues we see is over-reliance on symptom checklists,” the psychiatrists said. “ADHD can’t be diagnosed from a questionnaire alone; many traits overlap with anxiety, trauma or burnout.”
4) ADHD that’s been “masked” by other conditions
Meanwhile, sometimes ADHD really does occur alongside other conditions. For instance, autistic people are more likely than those without autism to have ADHD. When the two co-occur, it’s called AuDHD.
Advertisement
And, the psychiatrists told us, “Difficulties like inattention or restlessness can stem from anxiety, depression or environmental stress, not just ADHD.”
That might mean that an existing condition leads to ADHD going undiagnosed.
5) Only getting a diagnosis when at breaking point
We’ve written before about how menopausal women are increasingly being diagnosed with ADHD, in part because symptoms they’d been able to mask for years seem to come to the surface during the life stage.
Advertisement
“We often see ADHD become more noticeable during periods of hormonal change, when coping strategies are no longer as effective. For many women, this is when they seek support or receive a diagnosis for the first time,” the experts said.
What if I think I may have ADHD?
The psychiatrists said that you need to see an expert to get a diagnosis.
“There’s been a clear rise in awareness, which is positive,” the clinicians said. “But some online narratives oversimplify what a complex condition is.
Advertisement
“A thorough assessment looks at the full picture. That includes developmental history, current functioning, and whether there may be other factors contributing to those experiences. Without that level of depth, there’s a risk of both missing ADHD where it is present and identifying it where it isn’t.”
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
Every year, I’m buzzing for summer to roll around so I can frolic around in meadows and lie in the sun.
But then the reality of hay fever hits me around March time, and I lose all fantasies of an idyllic pastoral life in an instant.
The pollen count seems to get worse each year, too. It’s not just me: thanks to climate change messing with the weather, pollen season now lasts one to two weeks longer than it did less than three decades ago.
Advertisement
You know what that means: extra days of sneezing, itchy eyes, a runny nose, and dry throat. Joy of joys!
If, like me, you’re looking for something, anything, to help minimise the effects of hay fever, we’ve found 14 products that aren’t antihistamines to help deal with pesky pollen allergies.
For many of us, there is no greater comfort than rewatching our favourite shows – to the point that those familiar characters can begin to feel like close friends.
Because of this, it can be near impossible to imagine anyone else but the line-up of actors we know and love appearing in these series.
However, what you might not know, no matter how many times you have binge-watched them, is that some of the most popular shows in TV history almost had a very different cast.
With that in mind, we’ve rounded up 17 hit shows that almost had completely different A-list stars in their casts…
Advertisement
Elizabeth Olsen, Millie Bobby Brown, Sam Heughan and Mahershala Ali all didn’t make the cut for Game Of Thrones
Emilia Clarke and Kit Harington in Game Of Thrones
It sometimes felt like every actor in the world was in Game Of Thrones, but there are a few famous faces who didn’t make the cut, after auditioning for roles in the fantasy drama.
“I auditioned for, like, the assistant to the casting director in a small room in New York with just a camera on me and them reading the script,” she claimed. “I was doing the Khaleesi speech when she comes out of the fire. It was awful.”
Another A-lister who claims they “blew” their Game Of Thrones was Mahershala Ali. The two-time Oscar winner auditioned for the part of Xaro Xhoan Daxos, a merchant in Qarth, during season two, telling Jimmy Kimmel that it was the “worst audition of his life”.
Advertisement
Outlander star Sam Heughan, meanwhile, had multiple chances to appear on Game Of Thrones, auditioning to play Loras Tyrell, Renly Baratheon and several members of the Night’s Watch, but never landing any of them.
“I’d always get so close! I’d be like, ‘Guys, just give me a sword!’,” he told Vulture in 2014, lamenting: “Everyone was going in for those parts.”
Lastly, Millie Bobby Brown’s failure to land the role of Lyanna Mormont in the fantasy drama almost led her to quitting acting before her career had even taken off.
Millie Bobby Brown auditioned for Game Of Thrones in the early years of her career as a child actor
“I was auditioning for commercials, anything really,” the British star told Jimmy Kimmel in 2020. “I then auditioned for Game Of Thrones and I got a no for that. That’s kind of when I was like, ‘Oh, this is really difficult’.”
The role of Lyanna eventually went to Bella Ramsey, who now stars in The Last Of Us (and will next be seen in the upcoming season of The Celebrity Traitors).
Advertisement
Despite being one of the biggest shows of the 21st century, a long list of other actors also turned down roles in Game Of Thrones.
Hunger Games actor Sam Claflin dropped out of the audition process for Jon Snow after being offered a major movie role.
Despite the show’s success, he doesn’t regret this decision, telling Cinema Blend: “I like getting into things like that [as a viewer] and not being a part, because I always find it’s very jarring if I was part of it. But I’m a big fan.”
Gillian Anderson also rejected an unspecified role in the show, telling the Daily Mail back in 2013: “If I am going to be spending that amount of time working on something, I would rather be working with a director like Martin Scorsese.”
Advertisement
Succession actor Brian Cox turned down the role of Robert Baratheon, complaining in 2016 to Vodzilla that the show wouldn’t pay him enough, a complaint he later regretted.
“Now they have more money,” he continued. “And I was silly. I was silly, it was silly, because I’m a complete addict now.”
Before Succession, Brian Cox was offered a key role in Game Of Thrones but turned it down
In his memoir, Putting The Rabbit In The Hat, Brian wrote: “There’s always been a tendency of American productions to treat British actors differently from American actors,” he said. “In other words, to get them cheap.”
Many fans believe the actor was referring to the role of Mance Rayder, the King Beyond the Wall, which eventually went to Ciarán Hinds.
Advertisement
“It was a lovely part, a good part. I’m going to regret it,” he told HuffPost in 2012. “My problem is, I’ve got four kids, and at the moment, I’m reluctant to be away from home for a long time.”
Lily Allen quite rightly turned down the role of playing Yara Greyjoy, alongside her real-life brother Alfie Allen, who starred as Theon Greyjoy.
“They asked me if I’d be interested in playing Theon’s sister,” Lily claimed during a Reddit “Ask Me Anything” session.
“I felt uncomfortable because I would have had to go on a horse and he would have touched me up and shit. Once they told me what was entailed, I said, ‘no thanks’.”
Advertisement
Jennifer Lawrence, Lily Collins and Dakota Johnson all auditioned for Gossip Girl
Blake Lively and Taylor Momsen in Gossip Girl
CW Network/Kobal/Shutterstock
Gossip Girl creator Josh Schwartz has revealed that a then-16-year-old Jennifer Lawrence auditioned to play Serena van der Woodsen, the role which launched Blake Lively to fame.
“We did not realise this at the time, but Jennifer really wanted to play Serena and auditioned,” he told Vulture in 2018.
“This story came to us secondhand – but we were told she definitely auditioned and was bummed to not get it.”
Advertisement
Lily Collins auditioned for the show, too, with the hopes of playing Taylor Momsen’s character, Jenny.
She recalled to Glamour: “I was about 17 or 18 years old at the time. I remember driving onto the lot and going, ‘Oh my God. This is surreal’,
“It was one of those OMG moments,” she laughed. “Whether or not I got it, I knew I could say I screen tested on the lot and one day I want to work at one of these [studios],” the Emily In Paris actor added.
Gossip Girl casting director David Rapaport also told E! that the pilot starred Jessica Jones actor Krysten Ritter and Pitch Perfect star Brittany Snow, and that Dakota Johnson, Rooney Mara and Nina Dobrev all auditioned for the teen drama.
Advertisement
Although Kristen Bell was the top pick to voice Gossip Girl, both Christina Ricci and Selma Blair were “in the mix” as possible candidates, according to the executive producer.
Dawson’s Creek almost starred Selma Blair and Katherine Heigl
Michelle Williams, James Van Der Beek, Katie Holmes and Joshua Jackson in Dawson’s Creek
Creator Kevin Williamson told Entertainment Weekly in 2018 that Selma Blair was his first choice for Joey Potter, before seeing Katie Holmes’ audition.
Advertisement
“I really loved Selma until, of course, I got the infamous videotape from the basement of the Holmes family in Toledo, Ohio,” Kevin said.
“And when that video showed up, it changed my whole life.”
Grey’s Anatomy actor Katherine Heigl also nearly starred in the iconic 90s teen drama, auditioning for the role of Joey Potter, which ultimately went to Michelle Williams.
“She looked slightly older at that time. Even though she was younger, I just think she was more mature,” Kevin explained in the same interview. “She gave a great audition, I remember we were all sort of like, ‘Wow, she’s good.’”
There is an alternative universe where Vince Vaughn, Kristin Davis and Jon Favreau were in Friends
The stars of Friends pictured during the show’s first season
NBCUniversal via Getty Images
It’s hard to imagine anyone else playing Phoebe, Joey, Rachel, Ross, Chandler and Monica in Friends, but the road to those stars being cast was an especially arduous one.
During a 2015 interview with HuffPost, Friends casting director Ellie Kanner opened up about the difficulties of casting an ensemble of six.
Meanwhile, Tea Leoni was the first choice to play Rachel Green, but turned it down to star in another sitcom, The Naked Truth, which aired for three seasons.
30 Rock icon Jane Krakowski also auditioned for the role that eventually became a star-making turn for Jennifer Aniston.
Advertisement
“I, like almost every actor, auditioned for Friends,” the Broadway star told Giuliana Rancic at the 2015 Emmys. “I wish I had gotten that one… I didn’t go very far [in the audition process].”
Before landing her big break on The King of Queens, Leah Remini made it through several rounds of auditions to play Monica.
“I was devastated that I didn’t get it. We all knew it would be a huge hit. We just knew it,” Leah told MediaVillage.
Sex And The City’s own Kristin Davis also told James Corden in 2021 that she was was ”one of like 8,000 young ladies who read for Monica”, but didn’t get the part.
Advertisement
Vince Vaughn tried out for Friends back in the day, hoping to get cast as Joey
One of the many actors to audition for the role of Joey Tribbiani was Vince Vaughn, as did The Simpsons voice actor Hank Azaria, who eventually became known to Friends fans as Phoebe’s boyfriend David.
“I auditioned for Joey, and didn’t get it, and I was like, ‘No, no, I have to go back, I have to try again’,” Hank said during an appearance on The Late, Late Show.
“So, I bulled my way back in for a second time and they were very kind and watched my audition, and then threw me out. Spoiler alert, I didn’t get the role of Joey.”
Taraji P Henson and Gabrielle Union could have played Olivia Pope in Scandal
Kerry Washington as Olivia Pope in Scandal
Shondaland/Abc Studios/Kobal/Shutterstock
In the early stages of the casting process, The White Lotus actor Connie Britton was the first choice by play political fixer Olivia Pope in Scandal, until the show’s creator Shonda Rhimes stepped in.
Advertisement
She felt it was important that the role should go to a Black actor, with Kerry Washington eventually landing the part.
Taraji P. Henson has revealed she auditioned to play the character, even though she knew already that Kerry was a better fit for the part.
“When I went in to read for Shonda Rhimes, in my mind I was like, ‘this is Kerry Washington. Why am I even in here?’,” she told Power 105.1′s Angie Martinez.
Bring It On star Gabrielle Union has claimed she was in the final running to play Olivia Pope before Kerry was cast.
Advertisement
“I was one of the last five or 10 to audition,” she said in a 2013 interview with Rolling Out. “When Kerry got it, I congratulated her. Now after each episode, I’m leading the charge, like Gladiators, stand up! I’m obsessed with the show.”
Nicola Coughlan could have been in Stranger Things
The final season of Stranger Things premiered on Netflix in 2025
In March 2026, Nicola was asked during a radio interview if there were any “near-miss” roles in her past, befre admitting to having tried out for Netflix’s hit 80s-set series.
“It would be generous to myself to say I narrowly missed out on it,” she claimed. “But I did a first-round audition for Stranger Things.”
Fortunately, the Irish actor is not too bitter she didn’t land the role.
Advertisement
“You know when you watch a show and you go, ‘oh well, thank God I didn’t get that, because I would have been way worse!’,” she joked.
“I don’t think I was anywhere close to being in Stranger Things, but I did audition,” she added.
Benedict Cumberbatch and Jessica Chastain were nearly Bill and Sookie in True Blood
Stephen Moyer and Anna Paquin in True Blood
True Blood creator Alan Ball revealed that Benedict Cumberbatch auditioned to play the lead vampire role of Bill Compton in True Blood.
Speaking in 2018, for the show’s 10th anniversary, Alan also shared that Jessica Chastain read for the part of Sookie.
Advertisement
The characters were eventually portrayed on screen by Stephen Moyer and Anna Paquin, who married in real life after appearing on the supernatural show.
Alan also told The Hollywood Reporter: “Jennifer Lawrence read for, in season three, there’s this werepanther girl, and she was great”.
However, it was decided that Jen would be an inappropriate casting choice to play Jason’s girlfriend, given she was only 17 at the time.
Dakota Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen were among the stars who auditioned for lead roles in Girls
Advertisement
Allison Williams, Jemima Kirke, Lena Dunham and Zosia Mamet in Girls
The Emmy winner explained that Wandavision’s Elizabeth Olsen, Fifty Shades Of Grey’s Dakota Johnson, Black Mirror’s Cristin Milioti and comedian Amy Schumer tried out “several times” for her US comedy.
Lena previously wrote in her newsletter that Amy had auditioned for the role of Shoshanna, but “it was clear Amy wasn’t meant to play an innocent Juicy Couture lover obsessed with emoji – even if her Meatpacking District club lingo was the funniest shit I had ever heard”.
“When she left the room, the vibe was very ‘Someone give that lady a show, STAT!’” Lena added.
Jenny Slate who played Hannah’s high school nemesis Tally Schifrin in the series, was originally up for the role of uptight Marnie, a role Allison Williams was cast in.
Advertisement
“At the time the show Girls was being cast, and I went in a bunch of times for the role of Marnie,” she said on the Las Culturistas podcast.
Gillian Anderson declined a major part in Downton Abbey
Elizabeth McGovern and Hugh Bonneville in Downton Abbey
Back in 2012, she told TV Guide that she hoped her work in the TV adaptation of Great Expectations would be embraced “with the same love that flowed toward Downton Abbey”.
Advertisement
“I was actually offered a part in Downton,” she then added, referring to the role which would eventually be taken on my Elizabeth McGovern.
Matt LeBlanc almost joined another iconic sitcom after Friends ended
The stars of Modern Family pictured on set in 2009
Mario Perez/Abc-Tv/Kobal/Shutterstock
When the short-lived Friends spin-off Joey was cancelled, Matt LeBlanc had the opportunity to return to the sitcom world in another show that became a smash hit.
Speaking to USA Today, Matt explained that the script for Modern Family wound up on his desk, with an offer to play the role of the dorky patriarch Phil Dunphy.
Advertisement
“I remember reading it thinking, ‘this is a really good script, [but] I’m not the guy for this’,” he said. “I’d be doing the project an injustice to take this.”
The role, of course, went to Ty Burrell, who it’s hard to argue is perfect for the part.
Judy Greer also revealed she was asked to audition for Phil’s wife, Claire, but didn’t want to play a character with children.
“I was really torn about it, but I ended up obviously not,” the told the Dinner’s On Me podcast, hosted by Modern Family’s own Jesse Tyler Ferguson.
Advertisement
“Who knows if I would have even gotten it anyway? I was just like, ‘I don’t know if I want to be America’s mom yet’.”
Can you picture anyone else in Breaking Bad but Bryan Cranston?
The US broadcaster AMC and the show’s creator Vince Gilligan have both claimed these actors were sent scripts, although John Cusack insisted on social media in 2013 that he would never have turned down the role of Walter, branding the suggestion “crazy”.
Sarah Michelle Gellar wasn’t the first choice to play Buffy The Vampire Slayer
Advertisement
Sarah Michelle Gellar in character as Buffy Summers
Before being cast in her breakout role on Dawson’s Creek, Katie Holmes was offered the part of Buffy Summers in the iconic supernatural drama, but she decided to finish high school instead.
Selma Blair – who we know now almost appeared in Dawson’s Creek herself – revealed on Instagram in 2018 that she had also auditioned to play the vampire slayer but “didn’t even come close”.
Natasha Lyonne has claimed she was sent scripts for both Buffy and Dawson’s Creek after her performance in Everyone Says I Love You, but “did not want to be committed when I was 16 years old” to a demanding TV schedule.
It wasn’t just Buffy who actors were lining up to play, either.
Advertisement
Natasha Lyonne was offered the role of Buffy but turned it down
Yellowjackets actor Melanie Lynskey told Shut Up Evan that she was in the running to star as Willow, a role ultimately played by Alyson Hannigan.
“My biggest concern was that I didn’t want to play a guy in high school,” Ryan explained to the Toronto Star in 2008.
“I had just come out of high school, and it was fucking awful.”
Michael Keaton turned down the role of Jack on Lost because he wanted the character to die in the first episode
Advertisement
Lost was a TV phenomenon when it premiered in the mid-2000s
Florian Schneider / Disney
Beetlejuice actor Michael Keaton was originally set to play Jack Shepherd on Lost but, rather unusually, didn’t like the fact that the character would live for so long.
You see, Jack was originally going to be killed off in the first episode as a way to subvert audience’s expectations, something that attracted the Birdman star to the project.
“I think what happened was – and I’ve never really talked to [Lost co-creator J.J. Abrams] about this – he thought better of [the twist of Jack dying in the pilot],” he explained during a 2017 appearance on The Hollywood Reporter’s Awards Chatter podcast. “Or the studio said ’That ain’t gonna happen’.
“And then there was kind of a half a conversation, like, ‘Well, do you have any more interest?’…”
Advertisement
You can probably guess that he didn’t, which is Matthew Fox came to play the character in all six seasons of Lost.
Rob Lowe was one of many stars who turned down parts in Grey’s Anatomy
The stars of Grey’s Anatomy in 2005
Ron Tom/Abc-Tv/Kobal/Shutterstock
Several A-listers almost starred in Grey’s Anatomy before the long-running medical drama landed on our screens, most notably Rob Lowe, who passed on playing Derek “McDreamy” Shepherd.
“Me in that part isn’t as interesting as Patrick in that part,” he insisted. “If it’d been me, they wouldn’t have called me ‘McDreamy,’ they would have called me Rob Lowe’.”
“Had I done Grey’s, I wouldn’t have been in Parks and Recreation. That alone for me is enough,” he added.
The Dawson’s Creek actor originally said yes to the role until the 2008 Writer’s Strike led to disruption, and Joshua chose to instead appear in Fringe.
Advertisement
Chris Pine could have been a lead in The O.C.
The O.C. ran for four seasons between 2003 and 2007
Appearing on an episode of Josh Horowitz’s podcast Happy Sad Confused, Chris claimed: “I had awful skin as a teenager and then when I came after college, my skin started breaking out again.”
In TV critic Alan Sepinwall’s 2023 book Welcome to the O.C.: The Oral History, casting director Patrick Rush confirmed that while Chris was “really good” in his audition, he “was at the age where he was experiencing really bad skin problems”, which put him out of the running.
Advertisement
Patrick wrote: “It was at that point where it looked insurmountable. And as a kid who grew up with horrible skin, it just broke my heart. But Chris Pine’s fine now.”
At one point, Hugh Grant was in the running to replace Charlie Sheen in Two And A Half Men
Ashton Kutcher and Jon Cryer in the later years of Two And A Half Men
Warner Bros Tv/Chuck Lorre Prod/Kobal/Shutterstock
Years later, the English actor revealed that he had been offered a “stratospheric” amount of money to join the sitcom, but had reservations when he met with the creative team.
Advertisement
“They didn’t have a script or a new character,” Hugh told Howard Stern in 2016. “They just said, ‘Trust us, we’ll create one’.”
“I said, ‘well, you’re obviously brilliantly talented because I like that show’ and they make brilliant TV shows, but I said I’m I’m too scared to sign up without a script,” he claimed.
Ashton Kutcher would eventually take on a role within Two And A Half Men, which ran for four further seasons after Charlie’s infamous exit.
A whole host of stars were in the running to play Carrie Bradshaw in Sex And The City – while Alec Baldwin was originally eyed for the role of Mr Big
Advertisement
Sarah Jessica Parker and Chris Noth in Sex And The City
Sarah Jessica Parker is perfect as Carrie, but lots of other actors had the opportunity to walk in her Manolos.
In that version, the show would have been a spin-off vehicle for Carrie Fairchild, the character she played in Central Park West. However, Mädchen is said to have turned down the role to prioritise her family.
Desperate Housewives actor Dana Delany was also offered the role of Carrie, but apparently passed because she felt she was too closely associated with sex-related shows after appearing in Nude Girls and Exit To Eden.
House actor Lisa Edelstein also auditioned for Carrie and was even considered an alternate for if Sarah Jessica left the project.
Advertisement
Lisa told Access Hollywood: “I was either going to do it or not. It all depended on whether she said yes. My contract was complete. I was waiting.”
Kristin Davis also originally auditioned to play Carrie before being cast as uptight Charlotte York.
Meanwhile, Pose star Sandra Bernhard once told Howard Stern that she was asked if she was interested in playing Miranda Hobbes, but passed on it because she didn’t rate the original script, which she branded “terrible”.
Netflix could well have another hit on its hands with its new true crime drama Legends.
Helmed by The Gold creator Neil Forsyth and led by a sprawling all-star cast that includes Steve Coogan and Tom Burke, the six-part series has already earned positive reviews, and slowly began climbing the streaming service’s chart of most-watched shows upon its release last week.
With just six episodes in total and a gripping true story at its centre, Legends makes for ideal binge-viewing – but that does also mean that you may well have finished the whole thing by the end of the weekend.
Advertisement
Naturally, you might now be pondering whether or not more episodes of Legends could be coming in the future, so here’s a quick guide to everything we know at the moment…
Could there be a season 2 of Legends on Netflix?
Tom Burke’s performance as Guy in Legends has also been praised
The first thing to note is that Legends is based on a true story, which is wrapped up pretty well by the finale, so our immediate gut feeling is that it’s unlikely more episodes of Legends could be coming.
However, one glimmer of hope there could be for Legends viewers about the future of the show is that it’s not explicitly billed as a “miniseries” or “limited series” on Netflix, which its past offerings only intended to run for one season have said.
One interesting theory put forward by Radio Times is that if Netflix did want to carry Legends on, Neil Forsyth could look at other similar cases of ordinary people winding up in extraordinary circumstances, or undercover cases that made for great stories.
Advertisement
What should you stream next if you loved Legends?
Before Legends, Neil Forsyth oversaw the BBC drama The Gold
Both seasons of Neil Forsyth’s hit show The Gold are streaming on BBC iPlayer.
Starring Dominic Cooper and Hugh Bonneville, The Gold also features appearances from several Legends cast members, including Tom Hughes, Joshua Samuels and Thomas Coombes.
I often catch my multiply disabled daughter Millie in this pose: leaning forward in her rocker and staring at her lap, frowning.
My husband stands four feet from her, picking the first notes of a blues riff on his electric guitar. Millie smiles faintly when she recognises the clip-clop of the beat. As the G chord gives way to the C, and back to the G, she grins and sets her chair swinging. Next comes D, with its strong pull back to the opening note, and she snorts and cackles as my husband finishes the riff.
Sometimes, when he walks past Millie, he just hums the riff – ba-bum ba-bum ba-bum ba-bum – and the simple rhythm sung out loud makes her explode with laughter. I remarried a year ago, and Millie hasn’t known my husband long. But she still gets the joke.
Millie is 25 years old. She doesn’t walk on her own, or feed herself, or communicate with signs or symbols. Yet she lives along with the rest of us in a world of patterns and predictions, a world in which we wait for “tock” when we hear “tick”.
Advertisement
“The sense of an ending:” that’s what the literary theorist Frank Kermode called this most human of tendencies; he argued that it was the elementary structure of every story. Even though Millie can’t tell a story, or to my knowledge, understand one, she shares this sensibility. She lives knowingly in music, at play in the interval between beginnings and ends.
The most profound of beginnings and ends are those marking the opening and closing of a life. Our children die. But we act like they’ll live forever. We’re the ancestors; they’re the descendants – that’s how kinship is supposed to work.
It’s different when our children are profoundly disabled. Their lives are fragile and wondrous. Their life expectancy is more than a statistic; it’s a fact to reckon with. The longer you’ve loved them, the more it overshadows your days.
Millie is undiagnosed. Which means many things. Among them is the fact that I have no idea how long she will live.
Advertisement
Millie was 10 months old when the extent of her disabilities became evident. She’d had a normal birth and what looked like a normal early infancy, before missing all the developmental milestones.
No smiling, rolling, sitting, crawling. No babbling, looking into my eyes, or following my gaze. Our first geneticist tested her for the usual suspects: Rett Syndrome, Angelman Syndrome, plus some metabolic disorders. The lab techs sequenced, and sequenced again, but ruled all these conditions out.
This came as a blow, because Millie’s father and I wanted a road map. Back then, we were still thinking like most new parents. Millie’s childhood was our term of office. We were obsessed with the first 20 years of our daughter’s existence: the slow trip to the top of the rollercoaster, not the twists and turns that would confront her on the way back down.
When the doctors and therapists told us that Millie was “delayed”, we did everything we could to help her catch up. Our job was to help our daughter gather enough momentum to carry her through the rest of her life. We never gave a thought to how long the ride would last.
Advertisement
Then Millie’s father died of a heart attack, an end that expunged all thoughts of the future. I stepped off the rollercoaster and clung to my children, no longer worrying about who they would become. I made peace with the idea that Millie was just Millie – no labels or game plans required.
I went to work getting her the support she needed. The insurance company covered her wheelchair. The school district signed off on her services. I came up with my own answers for family and friends.
Then I learned something that made me long for a diagnosis again. Millie had begun taking the most benign drug for seizures when she was seven; in her late teens, it stopped working.
I had hoped she would grow out of seizures; instead, she was growing into them. They were getting worse. Millie might not lead a long life.
Advertisement
Millie’s doctors still thought that she showed signs of Rett Syndrome. Patients with Rett Syndrome have an average age of death of about 24 years – a year younger than my daughter. People with Rett Syndrome – who are almost always women – sometimes develop intractable seizures in their 20s.
Seizures are a common cause of sudden, unexpected death in this population.
Photo Courtesy Of Danilyn Rutherford
The author’s favorite photo with her daughter.
In 2024, I enrolled Millie in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network, which maintains a database of rare genetic anomalies and conducts cutting-edge testing to identify them. Millie hadn’t been tested since 2012, and her full genome had never been sequenced.
“I’m pretty sure we’ll find something,” the genetic counsellor told me when she went over the consent forms.
Advertisement
Conditions like Rett are caused by what geneticists call “de novo mutations,” or random rearrangements of one or more of the genes that control brain development. A stroke of fate had created my daughter. Suddenly, it felt urgent to discover where it had hit.
I threw my understanding of statistics to the wind. This wasn’t a matter of maybe. I had to be ready for the worst. Would she lose me someday, or would I lose her?
“What are your expectations for this meeting?” The genetic counsellor spoke with compassion from the square on my screen, although I suspected she was reading from a script.
It was November 2025, and I’d been waiting for this Zoom call for months. I glanced at my sister. She raised an eyebrow. She’s a geneticist, and I’d brought her along as backup.
Advertisement
“An answer?” I offered meekly. “So I can plan?”
The genetic counsellor cut to the chase.
My sister and I stared at her, slack-jawed.
The furnace kicked on. That morning, on a whim, I had dived from a dock into the Atlantic: a split second of flight, then I hit the freezing water, and time stopped.
Advertisement
I felt that way now: shot out of the story I feared I would soon be living. I had spent months preparing myself to bear up under the weight of bad news. Wonder swept through me. The death sentence had been lifted. Millie was unique. Like a snowflake. Or a comet. Or a god.
“I’m sorry,” the genetic counsellor said.
“No,” I stopped her. “There’s something beautiful about the fact that Millie isn’t like anyone else.”
After catching our breath, my sister and I peppered the genetic counsellor with questions. We wanted details. Did nothing really mean nothing?
Advertisement
There was a research study Millie could enrol in. Scientists were searching for mutations in the regulatory regions of the genome. This is my sister’s specialty. Her eyes lit up.
But the genetic counsellor cautioned us. “It will take years to build up that part of the database. I always try to balance hope with being realistic. Even if they find something, 10 years can go by before another patient turns up with the same anomaly. Or longer. We just don’t know.”
Wonder swept through me again. This quest of mine – to find out how Millie became Millie – it wasn’t just about us. “We don’t know what caused Millie,” I finally said. “We don’t know now, and we may not know until long after Millie and I are both dead. But someday someone will know. There’s something beautiful about that, as well.”
My sister had the last word. “Yes. We’d be doing this for science.”
Advertisement
“Grows, dies, grow, dies, grows, dies,” the memoirist and computer scientist Becky Taylor repeated one night as a small child with cerebral palsy. “What are you talking about?” her parents asked her. “Life,” she replied. Death finds us all. It’s simply a matter of when.”
After the meeting, my sister went through Millie’s paperwork. In fact, there was an anomaly in one of the genes associated with Millie’s symptoms; it’s called FOXG1. It may not mean anything – the majority of mutations are “silent,” non-functional bits of genetic fluff.
A website with information on FOXG1 syndrome included a video featuring some of the 1,500 individuals worldwide who have the condition. Most were small children. Either there aren’t many who live to adulthood or the geneticists just haven’t found them. I watched, my eyes moist, as a little girl materialised on the screen, her face blank, then blossoming into a smile. She could have been my daughter.
The FOXG1 gene is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, which means there’s funding for research. A parents’ group is sponsoring a study that has led to a treatment that is close to qualifying for clinical trials. There’s talk on the website of a “cure,” but the language also suggests that these parents just want to extend their children’s lives – the way I’d love to extend Millie’s.
Advertisement
Tick, then tock. Stories upon stories. Where will this new one lead? I’m hopeful, but I’m also ready for my daughter to continue to elude me.
The disabled lawyer and activist, Harriet McBryde Johnson, called her memoir Too Old to Die Young. The doctors were sure she wouldn’t survive past childhood; the joke was on them. So much for life expectancy.
A statistic is just a statistic – not a fact, just a chance. When I told Millie’s caregiver Marilyn, who is in her 90s, about the test results, she laughed. “That Millie. There’s nothing wrong with her. She’s been faking it all along.”
Earlier this week, the Pussycat Dolls cancelled almost every date on the US leg of their PCD Forever tour.
In a group statement posted on Instagram, they explained: “After taking an honest look at the North American run, we’ve made the difficult and heartbreaking decision to cancel all but one of the North America dates”.
This came after Meghan Trainor ditched her entire tour, citing “welcoming our new baby girl to our growing family of five” as her reason.
Meanwhile, Post Malone, who just canned six shows in his Big Ass Stadium Tour, said he did so to focus on his new album.
Advertisement
It all paints a pretty tough time for concert-goers. And some fans suspect that for certain artists, the real reason behind abandoned tour dates is what The Times has dubbed “blue dot fever”.
What is ‘blue dot fever’?
The trend’s name refers to the blue dots that represent unsold tickets on popular vendor Ticketmaster’s site.
Basically, it means not enough people are buying tickets to these concerts, making stars’ tours financially unviable.
The Times has noted that on Post Malone’s opening tour night, the site saw “blue dots populate all sections of the venue”.
Fans alleged that many seats on Meghan Trainor’s tour were unsold before she cancelled, while the Pussycat Dolls’ “heartbreaking decision” has also been linked to lower sales.
Advertisement
Eh… in that case why are my concert tickets still so expensive?
Exactly. Fortune said that might be part of the problem.
The publication said that the average ticket price has shot up in the last year in the US (where many stars have cancelled the most shows), from $115 (£84) last year to $144 (£106) in 2026. It was $82 (£60) in 2020.
That applies on this side of the Atlantic, too: data showed that between 1996 and 2025, the average UK concert ticket price increased 521%.
Advertisement
People simply might not be willing or able to pay. And if you think the inflated ticket costs might cover that shortfall, music data platform AndR claimed: “From a $100 [£73]ticket, the artist keeps an average of $8.16 [£6], [which is] less than the ticketing fees”.
Additionally, rising fuel prices following the Iran conflict mean that tours, which rely on planes, trains and automobiles to get artists from place to place, are seeing their already razor-thin margins shrink.
Iin America, musicians are battling for people’s wages against such stiff competition as 2026′s Fifa World Cup, tickets for which have been described as “extortionate”.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login