The cost of living crisis is continuing to bite with price rises and shrinkflation eating into workers’ pay. But hope springs eternal for hard-pressed CEOs. Their pay rises are comfortably outstripping those of the rank and file. And this means the pay ratio is an ever-growing chasm.

The High Pay Centre, a think tank focused on pay, corporate governance and responsible business, has published a briefing on trends in executive director compensation, CEO-to-employee pay ratios and employee pay. The High Pay Centre suggests that a wide pay ratio can lead to poor business outcomes.

This is intended as an update on figures assessed in the High Pay Centre’s ‘CEO Pay’ and ‘Pay Ratios’ reports, providing data from FTSE 100 firms that have released annual reports with year ends after 1 April 2025. The sample contains 64 companies, meaning there is potential for change as more reports come out during the year.

The High Pay Centre believes it’s vital to consider how to allocate a corporation’s wealth. Bosses should ensure that jobs are secure, fulfilling and provide the necessary income for a good standard of living.

Pay ratio ever-widening

Median (half get more, half get less) CEO pay stood at £5.2m. This represents a 15% increase in a year for the same group of companies. The mean (everyone’s pay added up and divided by the number of people) was £6.2m. This is a 19.75% increase.

Across the eight industries in the sample, only technology saw a fall in CEO pay from the previous year.

UK employees’ pay growth is significantly trailing behind that of their bosses with median employee pay having increased 4.85% versus 15% for CEOs.

Among the sample companies, the pay ratio between a median CEO and median employee is 95:1. And, as things stand, that’s only going to increase.

Andrew Speke, spokesperson for the High Pay Centre, said:

The data in this initial update is both shocking and concerning. A 15% median CEO pay increase, at a time when real-term wages are stagnating and living standards falling, is in neither the country nor the economy’s best interests.

This reflects corporate short-termism at its clearest. Companies themselves should be concerned about these trends, as research shows that when CEO pay rises significantly faster than employee pay, firms may be more exposed to operational and reputational risks. These include staff turnover, weakened employee morale and absenteeism, all of which hold the potential to significantly undermine firm productivity.

Policymakers, regulators and companies must endeavour to ensure a balanced, fair and sustainable model of corporate reward that recognises the indispensable value of the workforce alongside executive leadership. Addressing pay gaps should not be viewed solely as a matter of fairness, but also as a vital step in building a resilient and productive business model.

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Source link

The FIFA World Cup, which began over ninety years ago, is one of the most prominent tournaments to have witnessed bizarre incidents—whether funny or painful—with these events remaining etched in the memory of football history.

The strangeness of World Cup events has not faded with the passing of time; rather, it has become even more ingrained in the minds of fans of this most important and popular tournament in the world of football.

For this reason, any event that takes place during the tournament remains fresh in the memory, no matter how many years pass. Fans of the World Cup, which is held every four years, look forward to its most notable events, as its stories are renewed with every new edition. In this report, the Canary reviews the strangest events in World Cup history.

World Cup history – a national team wearing Napoli shirts

In the third-place play-off at the 1934 World Cup, which pitted Germany against Austria, a unique incident occurred. The match was held at the Napoli stadium, and at that time each team had only one kit.

Due to the similarity in the colours of the two teams’ kits (white shirts and black shorts), it was impossible to distinguish between the players, leading to the match being temporarily halted. Following intervention by the referee and the crowd, a draw was held to determine which team would change their kit, and the choice fell on the Austrian team, but they did not have an alternative kit. A quick solution was found, with an official from Napoli providing the Austrian team with the club’s shirts, which they wore to complete the match, which ended in a 3-2 victory for Germany.

World Cup stolen twice

The theft of the World Cup is one of the strangest incidents, as the trophy, which was known as the Jules Rimet Cup after the tournament’s founder, was stolen twice, first in 1966 and then in 1983. Since then, the original versions of the trophies have not been found, prompting the organisers to produce three identical replicas to prevent a repeat of the incident.

From prison to the podium

At the 1982 World Cup held in Spain, an extraordinary story emerged involving Italian star Paolo Rossi, who was released from prison in the same year as the tournament to lead his national team to victory over West Germany.

Rossi scored six goals in the last three matches, including the opening goal in the final, a hat-trick against Brazil in the quarter-finals, and two goals in the semi-final against Poland.

A valid goal disallowed in a World Cup match

The match between Kuwait and France at the 1982 World Cup witnessed a unique moment, as play was halted after the French team scored a valid goal. The Kuwaiti team was participating in the World Cup for the first time in its history as the first Arab-Asian team.

The incident occurred after a spectator blew a whistle, leading the Kuwaiti players to believe the play had ended, so they stopped, whilst the French team continued playing and scored a goal. This angered the Kuwaiti players, prompting Sheikh Fahad Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah to take to the pitch demanding the goal be disallowed, which indeed happened, before the match resumed and ended in a 4-2 victory for France. This incident led to Soviet referee Miroslav Stopa being permanently banned from refereeing.

Maradona’s handball goal

The goal scored by the hand of Argentine legend Diego Armando Maradona against England in the quarter-final of the 1986 World Cup is considered one of the defining moments of Argentina’s victory in that tournament, and a major turning point in the striker’s career, which subsequently took him to the world stage.

Tunisian referee Ali Ben Nasser, who officiated the match, awarded Maradona’s handball goal against England, despite its illegality, as he did not see Maradona’s hand when he struck the ball and it entered the net; however, Maradona later apologised to the referee during a visit to his home in Tunisia.

Player sent off after 3 yellow cards

In the match between Croatia and Australia at the 2006 World Cup, player Josip Šimunić received three yellow cards before being sent off, due to an error by English referee Graham Poll, who recorded the first booking in another player’s name, causing the player to remain on the pitch until he received his third booking.

Zinedine Zidane’s headbutt

The 2006 World Cup final between France and Italy witnessed a famous incident when star player Zinedine Zidane delivered a powerful headbutt to the chest of Marco Materazzi following a verbal altercation between them, resulting in his sending-off with a red card in his final match.

Zidane later justified his actions by citing an insult he had received, and the incident remains one of the most famous moments in World Cup history.

Suárez bites Chiellini

In the group stage match between Italy and Uruguay at the 2014 World Cup, a bizarre incident occurred when Luis Suárez bit defender Giorgio Chiellini in the 40th minute, which astonished everyone and sparked widespread controversy in the world of football.

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

When the New York Democrat mayor Zohran Mamdani released his budget for the 2027 financial year, it was  heralded as zeroing the massive $12 billion budget deficit he inherited from his predecessor, Eric Adams.

In turn, it also strikes a symbolic blow against critics of Zohran’s fiscal politics, which struck a notably more socialist tone than those of Independent competitor, Andrew Cuomo. In a statement, Mamdani’s office announced:

Through strong fiscal management, Mayor Mamdani balanced the budget through a combination of aggressive savings, new tax revenue, partnership with Albany and critical new investments in the needs of working class New Yorkers.

The budget is balanced without raising property taxes, slashing services or drawing down the City’s Rainy Day or Retiree Health Benefit Trust reserves and makes the largest City capital commitment to NYCHA in recent history.

If this all sounds a little bit too good to be true, it’s because it is. Mamdani has drawn large chunks of his proposed savings from the state of New York, along with delays on several other key expenses. As such, the budget is more of a short-term patch than a long-term fix.

However, this isn’t necessarily as large a criticism as it may seem. A $12 billion deficit can’t exactly be plugged without massive tax hikes or cuts to public services, neither of which would be popular. As such, we might expect some one-time cash injections and delayed payments.

 Mamdani: ‘This budget rejects that failed politics’

Mayor Mamdani said:

For too long, working New Yorkers have been told that austerity was the answer to adversity. This budget rejects that failed politics.

We are restoring fiscal stability without slashing the services people depend on, without raising property taxes and without asking working families to pay for a crisis they did not create.

Instead, we are making government work for the people of this city: securing support from Albany and taxing the rich so we can invest in housing, safety, child care, parks, libraries and the public goods that make New York the greatest city in the world.

Advertisement

That tax on the rich takes the form of a ‘pied-à-terre’ second-home tax on properties worth more than $5 million. The mayor’s office values this new income stream at around $500 million.

Likewise, Mamdani is also proposing a reduction to Unincorporated Business Tax (UBT) tax credit. This credit, he claims, “overwhelmingly benefits millionaires”. However, the mayor will first have to get his proposal past  Speaker Julie Menin and the city council.

On top of this, Mamdani also conjured up $1.2 billion in otherwise-idle salary money. Politico largely attributed to this to “the city’s smaller-than-expected headcount in the current fiscal year, which the budget office is using to fund recurring expenses”.

Delayed costs not paid costs

Regarding those one-time cash injections, the mayor’s office stated:

Thanks to Governor Kathy Hochul, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, the City secured an additional $4 billion in state support and actions to help stabilise the budget. That includes $352 million in direct aid, $3.2 billion in state authorisations.

Those state authorisations include permission to delay compliance with maximum classroom size mandates. This law was a result of years of lobbying by the Union for Teachers, requiring limits of 20-25 students according to age. As such, the delay is bad news for both teachers and students, even if it does massage the budget.

Likewise, Mamdani also obtained the state’s approval to delay the city’s contributions to pension payments. However, this will also require the permission of four of New York’s five major public pension funds. The plan has also drawn fire from commentators such as Andrew Rein, of the Citizens Budget Commission.

He said:

We have to solve this budget gap today, and basically by stretching out pension payments we’re asking people in the mid-2030s to solve the 2027 budget gap, and that’s simply not fair. We’re going to ask people who don’t even live here yet to help us balance the budget now.

Public money for public services

However, solving this budget gap today is hardly a realistic proposal, especially alongside the ambitious public programmes and expansions that Mamdani has planned. These include, but are by no means limited to:

• $15m for the Department of Parks and Recreation
• $31.7m for the city’s libraries
• $15m for the City University of New York
• $2.3m to launch Little Apple — “the City’s first Municipal day care system”
• $20.5m on supporting street vendors.
• $47.3m for access to mental health care

Faced with a choice between austerity and investment, Mambani’s budget has lent more (but not completely) towards the latter. As such, his long-term gambles may prove an interesting proving ground for similar anti-austerity measures.

The real test will come in several years time, when such temporary fixes are less readily apparent.

Featured image via AP Photo/ Alejandro Granadillo 

By The Canary

Source link

Spanish coach Pep Guardiola, manager of Manchester City, has cast doubt on the reliability of VAR, suggesting that refereeing decisions in English football have become akin to “flipping a coin” – a striking expression of his loss of confidence in the refereeing system despite the technical advances that are supposed to minimise errors.

According to the Guardian, Guardiola went into the match against Crystal Palace feeling deeply frustrated with video technology, insisting that Manchester City no longer has the luxury of waiting for refereeing fairness, but must now decide matches through their performance on the pitch, free from any considerations linked to referees or VAR screens.

He said:

I never trust anything since I arrived [at City] a long time ago. Always I learned you have do it better – be in a position to do it better because [if not] you blame yourself with what you have to do, because [VAR] is a flip of a coin. You have to do better and better for yourself, and that is focusing on Crystal Palace for us

Guardiola speaks out

The Spanish manager said that reliance on technology has not brought the clarity expected to English football, but has instead increased controversy and uncertainty, with divisive decisions continuing week after week.

Guardiola’s comments came after the recent refereeing storm following the disallowed West Ham United goal against Arsenal, an incident that has reignited the debate over the effectiveness of video technology and the limits of its intervention in major matches.

According to the report, the Manchester City manager still believes his team has paid the price for influential refereeing decisions over the past two seasons, including in the FA Cup final, but this time he chose to deliver his message directly: the only way to avoid the injustice of decisions is through overwhelming dominance on the pitch.

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola’s reaction to the latest VAR drama was blunt and businesslike. He’s not interested in arguing about decisions he can’t control. After Arsenal’s late VAR-assisted win at West Ham widened the gap at the top of the Premier League, Guardiola insisted Manchester City must concentrate on their own standards and performances rather than refereeing controversies. The managers stance is clear: do better on the pitch and don’t hand control of your fate to others.

Guardiola’s words were sharp and familiar. He told reporters:

I have never trusted anything [with VAR] since I arrived a long time ago.

That line isn;t a rant, it’s Pep speaking from his own experiences. For Guardiola, VAR is an external variable, the only reliable lever is what his team does between the lines.

Pep repeatedly framed the issue as one of self-accountability: if City want to be in the title fight, they must put themselves in positions where marginal calls don’t decide outcomes.

Guardiola prepares for league finish

City’s immediate task is Crystal Palace at the Etihad Stadium. Guardiola refused to let the league table dictate his messaging; the focus is on the next game. Not Arsenal’s result or hypothetical permutations. He stressed routine and concentration. He has given his players a day off, reset, then prepare, the classic Guardiola reset button.

Pep knows better than the rest, with two games remaining,, panic helps nobody. His pragmatic approach is one where precision makes the difference.

Crystal Palace aren’t a walkover. Guardiola pointed to Palace’s professionalism and the competitive nature of late-season fixtures, even for teams with other priorities.

Palace have a UEFA Europa League Conference Final to consider, but Guardiola expects them to be tough and committed. He referenced recent examples of teams with “nothing to play for” still making life difficult for top sides, a reminder that complacency is the enemy.

Manchester City hope to welcome back Rodri after a groin problem and could see Abdukodir Khusanov return to the squad. Guardiola described both as “better” and fitness would be assessed in training.

Those returns matter massively for City: Rodri’s presence stabilises midfield control and reduces chances of sloppy moments that invite VAR scrutiny.

In a title race decided by fine margins, availability and sharpness are as decisive as refereeing decisions.

Demanding higher standards

Pep Guardiola’s message is simple and relentless, control the controllables. He’s not asking for conspiracy theories or institutional changes. He’s demanding higher standards from his players. This is nothing new from Pep as his methods have been very successful, he removes external pressure from his players, allowing them to flow on th epitch.

Whether that’s enough to catch Arsenal this season with only three games left, remains to be seen. What is for sure is the performance levels on the pitch cannot drop regardless of the decisions elsewhere.

Pep’s overall verdict on VAR is sceptical and settled. Many would argue that Manchester City are one the highest benefiting team of VAR decisions, regardless of Pep’s current view.

But, Pep’s message to his players is clear, focus on the next game, sharpen the basics, make sure the referee and VAR do not matter. If they can maintain that focus, they still have a strong chance of finishing with a domestic treble.

Featured image via Sky Sports

By Faz Ali

Source link

Following weeks of Israeli bombardment, displacement and sheer terrorism inflicted on people in Lebanon a so-called ‘ceasefire’ was reached. By the time it took effect Israel had brutally murdered over 2,400 children.

However, true to murderous form, Israel has continued to kill Lebanese civilians – just as it violates every bullshit ‘ceasefire’ agreement it reaches with Palestine. Now, charity Save the Children have raised an urgent alarm regarding the fact that Israel has been killing, or injuring, four children every single day since the so-called ‘ceasefire’ began.

Once again, the Western-backed Zionist state shows that it doesn’t recognise Arab life as being of equal value to its own citizens, with the death toll now sitting at 2,900 Lebanese men, women and children.

This headline should be in every Western news outlet. pic.twitter.com/kjkjfzblkS

— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) May 12, 2026

Lebanon under Zionist attack

Save the Children works across the world to improve the lives of children through humanitarian support and advocacy. As such, they are leading that essential mission now by exposing that Israel is continuing to murder and maim children in Lebanon during its expansionist agenda. 

Furthermore, they highlight how escalating numbers of children are living with their families in collective shelters which have seen an increase of 5% since this alleged ceasefire took hold on April 17 2026. Israel’s renewed displacement orders and ongoing aggression have forced more than one million people from their homes, displacing roughly one sixth of the entire population in Lebanon.

Some families have reportedly stayed with relatives or host communities. However, 44,800 children and their families now endure insecure and overcrowded collective shelters, while 125,000 people lack adequate access to water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities. As a result, Save the Children report ‘growing health concerns’ including scabies.

Moreover, they have spoken to Lebanese families affected who have heartbreakingly reported that their children are struggling to sleep and have lost their appetite due to the traumatic conditions they are living under.

As families are forced from their communities, many children are subsequently losing access to both the internet and safe spaces to learn. In fact, some schools now serve as collective shelters in order to keep vulnerable families somewhat safe.

One Lebanese child told Save the Children:

I just want the war to end so I can go home to my village and sleep in my own bed. I really miss school, I want to see my teachers and be with my friends, and study and play again.

Americans, your tax money is funding acts of genocide. Report on today’s Israeli attacks on Lebanon, which have killed 12 civilians, including two children, so far.

Also footage of bombing from close to the site of the report.

Cameraman: @aliezzeddine00 pic.twitter.com/AtKcthUngB

— courtneybonneauimages (@cbonneauimages) May 13, 2026

Advertisement

Black Wednesday

Israel has continued its expansionist agenda into Lebanese territory after destroying Gaza and killing potentially hundreds of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children. Recently, journalist Courtney Bonneau has worked hard to expose this genocide to the Western world.

For instance, on April 8th – or now referred to as ‘Black Wednesday’, Israel murdered 182 in Lebanon in just 10 minutes of widespread and catastrophic bombardments. This occurred while Iran agreed to a ceasefire, which many believed would extend to Israel’s neighbouring state as well.

On the contrary, as Courtney and Save the Children underscore, Israel purposely and repeatedly violates ceasefires. On the other hand, Zionist Israel is revealing just how hostile, barbaric and murderous it intrinsically is. 

That death toll is only going to grow, as Israel and the West shows it just doesn’t care about Arab life. This video has just been posted, showing Israel dropping bombs yet again in Lebanon:

Israeli warplanes carried out an airstrike on Deir ez-Zahrani in southern Lebanon a few moments ago. pic.twitter.com/ZtSSUa9spP

— Visioner (@visionergeo) May 13, 2026

Save the Children’s Country Director in Lebanon is quoted as saying:

This ‘so called’ ceasefire that still sees more than four children killed or injured every day is not a ceasefire for children.

Attacks on civilians have not stopped; They have simply continued under another name.

Colleagues have told me that the airstrikes feel more intense in some areas than they ever did before.

Children are not safe until there is a permanent and definitive ceasefire with no violations.

Advertisement

International community MUST stop Israel

State leaders and the right-wing mainstream media might believe they can continually shield Israel from accountability under international law. After all, they have made clear that the death of children really does not bother them. At least not when those children have brown skin. Before the UK’s racists clamour to suggest there is an ‘Islamist threat’ that must be wiped out, Lebanese Christians have also been murdered in Israeli airstrikes.

Citizens across the world, including huge numbers in the UK, continue to call out Israel’s genocidal acts, and leaders must start listening to their own citizens instead of their Zionist paymasters.

Therefore, condemnation is better late than never, and Western leaders must confront Israel once and for all.

“Never again” meant never again for anybody. It did not mean creating a hierarchy of life that values only Zionist Israeli lives above all others.

Featured image via the Canary

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

More than 130 international leaders in university governance, education and public policy have signed an open letter in solidarity against Birmingham City University’s (BCU) plan to end its MA in Black Studies and Global Justice.

The decision follows the university having folded its undergraduate course in Black Studies in 2024. The master’s course itself had been open for mere months before BCU made a unilateral decision to close it down.

As such, the open letter highlights that Black Studies itself is being erased and how university management are targeting Black faculty.

The only staff put at risk of potential redundancy are the only Black staff in the sociology division.

Course leader, Professor Kehinde Andrews, worked to develop the Black Studies courses and penned the open letter. He also launched a petition with the goal of saving the postgraduate course, which already has more than 3,000 signatures.

BCU’s Black staff ‘singled out for redundancy’

It’s reported that BCU decided to close the course back in February. However, course leaders were given just 24 hours’ notice for the meeting in which they were told the news.

In that meeting, they were blindsided and learnt the following:

• The decision had been taken, with no consultation from the staff team, to close the MA Black Studies and Global Justice, after less than a year of the course running

• A proposal to reduce the staff team, putting all of us at the potential risk of compulsory redundancy

As an attempted rationale for its decision, BCU highlighted the low recruitment levels on the MA. Currently, eight students are enrolled on the course. However, this excuse falls flat given that this is merely its first year of existence.

Five Black members of staff now face redundancy. Worse still, in spite of his colleagues’ expertise across the field of sociology, Andrews highlighted that BCU had selected its redundancy pool in a way that specifically impacted Black employees.

Even if the Board accepts the decision to close the MA programme, it does not logically or legally follow that permanent academic posts must be made redundant. These are separate decisions requiring separate justification…

By defining the selection pool around a single course rather than the department in which staff are contractually employed, the University has created a foreseeable and disproportionate impact on Black staff.

Three key demands from BCU staff

As an illustration of the racist nature of this redundancy selection, we can look to Andrews’ actual role. He was appointed as a professor for international leadership in research, rather than Black Studies itself. Likewise, teaching on the MA accounts for less than 10% of his time. Still, he is now up for redundancy.

It is also damning that, in spite of its claims to lead in equality, diversity, and inclusion, and a public commitment to retaining black staff, BCU hasn’t carried out an equality impact assessment before making this decision.

As such, the open letter’s signatories have made three key demands of the board of governors:

1. Direct the University Executive Team to remove the threat of compulsory redundancy and end the consultation, pending a full, legal departmental level review

2. Ensure the university undertakes meaningful engagement on retaining Black Studies content in the curriculum that is accessible across the university.

3. Ensure the university explores a distance learning MA Black Studies and Global Justice.

A broader pattern

Many UK universities are currently afflicted by financial crisis, and have begun making desperate cuts to courses.

However, Andrews highlighted that BCU’s actions fit into a broader pattern of erasure of “Black knowledge and critical education” in both the UK and the US.

He wrote:

Unfortunately, the lack of support for courses based on knowledge produced by Black communities has been glaringly absent in academia.

The high-profile closures of courses like the MRes in the History of Africa and the African Diaspora, and redundancy of Professor Hakim Adi at the University of Chichester… are indicative of a worrying trend.

Advertisement

In the US there is an attack on Black intellectual thought, in the UK there is so little of it on offer in higher education that the bigger problem is neglect. When we do manage to offer such courses they should be nurtured, not stamped out at the earliest opportunity.

With fascism and the far right on the rise again, both at home and abroad, attacks on the inclusion and knowledge-production of marginalised communities are also increasing.

In making its threats against Black Studies, BCU has demonstrated that its knee-jerk reaction to financial pressure is to pass the buck to Black staff.

University management must act now to show that its commitments to EDI and Black employees were more than mere words, and that its principles will not evaporate at the first sign of a political shift.

Featured image via Getty Images

By Alex/Rose Cocker

Source link

According to Labour insiders, health secretary Wes Streeting will resign and launch his bid to topple Keir Starmer tomorrow, following a terse 16-minute meeting with Starmer at No 10 today. It would appear those who thought the monarch was visibly just going through the motions of his ‘king’s speech’ today were right.

As Skwawkbox predicted earlier, the bid was only delayed to spare the king’s ’embarrassment’ at having to deliver the supposed ‘plan for government’ on behalf of a PM facing an ouster. As also predicted yesterday, Streeting is rushing through his bid because he and his supporters know he would stand no chance against Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham. Burnham needs time to get into a parliamentary seat before he can make any challenge.

The bid comes after former ‘Tinge’ MP Chuka Umunna visited Downing Street on behalf of an Israel-supporting US banking giant that is demanding a right-wing replacement for Starmer. Streeting has accepted huge donations from the UK Israel lobby and will, according to the latest polling, destroy the rotting carcass of ‘Labour’.

According to that analysis, in the next election a Wes Streeting-led Labour will retain only around five seats from the more than 400 it ‘won’ in 2024 with the help of Farage’s Reform UK ‘party’.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

TV cameras posted on Downing Street yesterday happened to catch an interesting development and none of them even noticed. They were there in hopes of news of Keir Starmer’s imminent resignation. Instead, amid the ‘bubble’ soundbites, they caught defunct former Labour and Tinge party MP Chuka Umunna entering No 10.

Number 10 claimed that Umunna was not there in connection with Starmer’s tenure, but as part of his ‘routine’ visits on behalf of US finance giant JP Morgan. It’s interesting enough, if unsurprising, that a US corporate lobbyist has ‘routine’ access to the UK prime minister. But even more interesting when, in response to Starmer’s imminent demise, Umunna’s boss has just demanded that the UK government stay hard right when he goes.

Ransom demands?

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon said yesterday, 12 May 2026, that his bank will cancel £3bn of investment in the UK if Starmer’s replacement is “hostile to banks”. The connection may have escaped the notice (or at least comment) of UK ‘mainstream media. But it didn’t escape the attention of everyone:

Even more worryingly, Dimon is a firm supporter of Israel and of the illegal US-Israel war on Iran.

Few would doubt that Starmer – or, in this case, his handlers trying to rig who replaces him – will sell out to Big Finance and/or the Israel lobby in a heartbeat. It seems that both have access at will, right at the heart of the matter.

Just when the needs and interests of the UK and its people should be front, centre and exclusively in the minds of those clinging on in Number 10.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

On Thursday 14 May, Reform UK is fighting a by-election in South Gloucestershire. Or it was, anyway. Reform has now withdrawn support for candidate Paul Heyward, with no time left for the party to field an alternative.

Heyward was binned after it emerged he had suggested someone shoot Kier Starmer on his since-deleted X account. Given that Heyward’s comments first came to light in April, the question is: why did it take so long to give him the boot?

Reform candidate Paul Heyward, from Winterbourne faces questions over posting 'Somebody shoot this ****' about PM
He has since deleted his account on Xhttps://t.co/siYQfBzVvP

— dave lawrence (@dave43law) April 29, 2026

Another one gone

Reform announced it had withdrawn support for Heyward on Tuesday 12 May – two days before the by-election. This means Heyward’s name will still be on the ballot, but if elected, he will not represent Reform. Given this, it’s unclear if he’ll want to sit as an independent or if he’ll immediately resign (should he win). The only other candidate is the Green Party’s Monica Maggs.

As reported by Bristol Live, Heyward’s other problematic posts include:

• Calling Ed Miliband a “mong” (an old-fashioned ableist slur);
• Describing himself as “anti Islam”;
• Being opposed to immigration and transgender people.

Heyward joins a long list of Reform councillors who’ve jumped or been pushed since the 2025 local elections:

Reform UK Councillors Gone: Updated

Paul Heyward has been suspended for social media posts.

Advertisement

Kicked Out
Brian Black
Oliver Bradshaw
Paul Thomas
Bob Ford
Bill Barratt
Ed Hill
James Regan
Mark Broadhurst
Paul Bean
Adam Smith
Daniel Taylor
John Allen
Nicole Brooke
Patrick…

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) May 13, 2026

Perhaps the most surprising thing here is that Reform actually suspended him. As we reported in the runup to the local elections, Reform ran many candidates who said even worse things than Heyward with no action taken:

• Another Reform candidate praises Oswald Moseley – a rite of party initiation?
• Reform candidate wants to ‘tear down’ the NHS
• Another Reform candidate has praised Enoch Powell
• Reform welcomes ‘shoot the p*kis’ scandal ex-Tory
• Reform UK accused of ‘nil vetting’ as another racist candidate exposed

Low quality candidates

While we’re no fans of Keir Starmer, it’s obviously over the line to call for his murder. It’s true that social media has a desensitising effect, which means people fail to realise their words have weight, but that’s no excuse for someone who wants to run for public office.

The people representing us locally and nationally should be of the highest calibre. When it comes to Heyward, however, the man is clearly thinking about a different sort of calibre altogether.

Featured image via The Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link