Spanish coach Pep Guardiola, manager of Manchester City, has cast doubt on the reliability of VAR, suggesting that refereeing decisions in English football have become akin to “flipping a coin” – a striking expression of his loss of confidence in the refereeing system despite the technical advances that are supposed to minimise errors.

According to the Guardian, Guardiola went into the match against Crystal Palace feeling deeply frustrated with video technology, insisting that Manchester City no longer has the luxury of waiting for refereeing fairness, but must now decide matches through their performance on the pitch, free from any considerations linked to referees or VAR screens.

He said:

I never trust anything since I arrived [at City] a long time ago. Always I learned you have do it better – be in a position to do it better because [if not] you blame yourself with what you have to do, because [VAR] is a flip of a coin. You have to do better and better for yourself, and that is focusing on Crystal Palace for us

Guardiola speaks out

The Spanish manager said that reliance on technology has not brought the clarity expected to English football, but has instead increased controversy and uncertainty, with divisive decisions continuing week after week.

Guardiola’s comments came after the recent refereeing storm following the disallowed West Ham United goal against Arsenal, an incident that has reignited the debate over the effectiveness of video technology and the limits of its intervention in major matches.

According to the report, the Manchester City manager still believes his team has paid the price for influential refereeing decisions over the past two seasons, including in the FA Cup final, but this time he chose to deliver his message directly: the only way to avoid the injustice of decisions is through overwhelming dominance on the pitch.

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola’s reaction to the latest VAR drama was blunt and businesslike. He’s not interested in arguing about decisions he can’t control. After Arsenal’s late VAR-assisted win at West Ham widened the gap at the top of the Premier League, Guardiola insisted Manchester City must concentrate on their own standards and performances rather than refereeing controversies. The managers stance is clear: do better on the pitch and don’t hand control of your fate to others.

Guardiola’s words were sharp and familiar. He told reporters:

I have never trusted anything [with VAR] since I arrived a long time ago.

That line isn;t a rant, it’s Pep speaking from his own experiences. For Guardiola, VAR is an external variable, the only reliable lever is what his team does between the lines.

Pep repeatedly framed the issue as one of self-accountability: if City want to be in the title fight, they must put themselves in positions where marginal calls don’t decide outcomes.

Guardiola prepares for league finish

City’s immediate task is Crystal Palace at the Etihad Stadium. Guardiola refused to let the league table dictate his messaging; the focus is on the next game. Not Arsenal’s result or hypothetical permutations. He stressed routine and concentration. He has given his players a day off, reset, then prepare, the classic Guardiola reset button.

Pep knows better than the rest, with two games remaining,, panic helps nobody. His pragmatic approach is one where precision makes the difference.

Crystal Palace aren’t a walkover. Guardiola pointed to Palace’s professionalism and the competitive nature of late-season fixtures, even for teams with other priorities.

Palace have a UEFA Europa League Conference Final to consider, but Guardiola expects them to be tough and committed. He referenced recent examples of teams with “nothing to play for” still making life difficult for top sides, a reminder that complacency is the enemy.

Manchester City hope to welcome back Rodri after a groin problem and could see Abdukodir Khusanov return to the squad. Guardiola described both as “better” and fitness would be assessed in training.

Those returns matter massively for City: Rodri’s presence stabilises midfield control and reduces chances of sloppy moments that invite VAR scrutiny.

In a title race decided by fine margins, availability and sharpness are as decisive as refereeing decisions.

Demanding higher standards

Pep Guardiola’s message is simple and relentless, control the controllables. He’s not asking for conspiracy theories or institutional changes. He’s demanding higher standards from his players. This is nothing new from Pep as his methods have been very successful, he removes external pressure from his players, allowing them to flow on th epitch.

Whether that’s enough to catch Arsenal this season with only three games left, remains to be seen. What is for sure is the performance levels on the pitch cannot drop regardless of the decisions elsewhere.

Pep’s overall verdict on VAR is sceptical and settled. Many would argue that Manchester City are one the highest benefiting team of VAR decisions, regardless of Pep’s current view.

But, Pep’s message to his players is clear, focus on the next game, sharpen the basics, make sure the referee and VAR do not matter. If they can maintain that focus, they still have a strong chance of finishing with a domestic treble.

Featured image via Sky Sports

By Faz Ali

Source link

Following weeks of Israeli bombardment, displacement and sheer terrorism inflicted on people in Lebanon a so-called ‘ceasefire’ was reached. By the time it took effect Israel had brutally murdered over 2,400 children.

However, true to murderous form, Israel has continued to kill Lebanese civilians – just as it violates every bullshit ‘ceasefire’ agreement it reaches with Palestine. Now, charity Save the Children have raised an urgent alarm regarding the fact that Israel has been killing, or injuring, four children every single day since the so-called ‘ceasefire’ began.

Once again, the Western-backed Zionist state shows that it doesn’t recognise Arab life as being of equal value to its own citizens, with the death toll now sitting at 2,900 Lebanese men, women and children.

This headline should be in every Western news outlet. pic.twitter.com/kjkjfzblkS

— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) May 12, 2026

Lebanon under Zionist attack

Save the Children works across the world to improve the lives of children through humanitarian support and advocacy. As such, they are leading that essential mission now by exposing that Israel is continuing to murder and maim children in Lebanon during its expansionist agenda. 

Furthermore, they highlight how escalating numbers of children are living with their families in collective shelters which have seen an increase of 5% since this alleged ceasefire took hold on April 17 2026. Israel’s renewed displacement orders and ongoing aggression have forced more than one million people from their homes, displacing roughly one sixth of the entire population in Lebanon.

Some families have reportedly stayed with relatives or host communities. However, 44,800 children and their families now endure insecure and overcrowded collective shelters, while 125,000 people lack adequate access to water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities. As a result, Save the Children report ‘growing health concerns’ including scabies.

Moreover, they have spoken to Lebanese families affected who have heartbreakingly reported that their children are struggling to sleep and have lost their appetite due to the traumatic conditions they are living under.

As families are forced from their communities, many children are subsequently losing access to both the internet and safe spaces to learn. In fact, some schools now serve as collective shelters in order to keep vulnerable families somewhat safe.

One Lebanese child told Save the Children:

I just want the war to end so I can go home to my village and sleep in my own bed. I really miss school, I want to see my teachers and be with my friends, and study and play again.

Americans, your tax money is funding acts of genocide. Report on today’s Israeli attacks on Lebanon, which have killed 12 civilians, including two children, so far.

Also footage of bombing from close to the site of the report.

Cameraman: @aliezzeddine00 pic.twitter.com/AtKcthUngB

— courtneybonneauimages (@cbonneauimages) May 13, 2026

Advertisement

Black Wednesday

Israel has continued its expansionist agenda into Lebanese territory after destroying Gaza and killing potentially hundreds of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children. Recently, journalist Courtney Bonneau has worked hard to expose this genocide to the Western world.

For instance, on April 8th – or now referred to as ‘Black Wednesday’, Israel murdered 182 in Lebanon in just 10 minutes of widespread and catastrophic bombardments. This occurred while Iran agreed to a ceasefire, which many believed would extend to Israel’s neighbouring state as well.

On the contrary, as Courtney and Save the Children underscore, Israel purposely and repeatedly violates ceasefires. On the other hand, Zionist Israel is revealing just how hostile, barbaric and murderous it intrinsically is. 

That death toll is only going to grow, as Israel and the West shows it just doesn’t care about Arab life. This video has just been posted, showing Israel dropping bombs yet again in Lebanon:

Israeli warplanes carried out an airstrike on Deir ez-Zahrani in southern Lebanon a few moments ago. pic.twitter.com/ZtSSUa9spP

— Visioner (@visionergeo) May 13, 2026

Save the Children’s Country Director in Lebanon is quoted as saying:

This ‘so called’ ceasefire that still sees more than four children killed or injured every day is not a ceasefire for children.

Attacks on civilians have not stopped; They have simply continued under another name.

Colleagues have told me that the airstrikes feel more intense in some areas than they ever did before.

Children are not safe until there is a permanent and definitive ceasefire with no violations.

Advertisement

International community MUST stop Israel

State leaders and the right-wing mainstream media might believe they can continually shield Israel from accountability under international law. After all, they have made clear that the death of children really does not bother them. At least not when those children have brown skin. Before the UK’s racists clamour to suggest there is an ‘Islamist threat’ that must be wiped out, Lebanese Christians have also been murdered in Israeli airstrikes.

Citizens across the world, including huge numbers in the UK, continue to call out Israel’s genocidal acts, and leaders must start listening to their own citizens instead of their Zionist paymasters.

Therefore, condemnation is better late than never, and Western leaders must confront Israel once and for all.

“Never again” meant never again for anybody. It did not mean creating a hierarchy of life that values only Zionist Israeli lives above all others.

Featured image via the Canary

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

More than 130 international leaders in university governance, education and public policy have signed an open letter in solidarity against Birmingham City University’s (BCU) plan to end its MA in Black Studies and Global Justice.

The decision follows the university having folded its undergraduate course in Black Studies in 2024. The master’s course itself had been open for mere months before BCU made a unilateral decision to close it down.

As such, the open letter highlights that Black Studies itself is being erased and how university management are targeting Black faculty.

The only staff put at risk of potential redundancy are the only Black staff in the sociology division.

Course leader, Professor Kehinde Andrews, worked to develop the Black Studies courses and penned the open letter. He also launched a petition with the goal of saving the postgraduate course, which already has more than 3,000 signatures.

BCU’s Black staff ‘singled out for redundancy’

It’s reported that BCU decided to close the course back in February. However, course leaders were given just 24 hours’ notice for the meeting in which they were told the news.

In that meeting, they were blindsided and learnt the following:

• The decision had been taken, with no consultation from the staff team, to close the MA Black Studies and Global Justice, after less than a year of the course running

• A proposal to reduce the staff team, putting all of us at the potential risk of compulsory redundancy

As an attempted rationale for its decision, BCU highlighted the low recruitment levels on the MA. Currently, eight students are enrolled on the course. However, this excuse falls flat given that this is merely its first year of existence.

Five Black members of staff now face redundancy. Worse still, in spite of his colleagues’ expertise across the field of sociology, Andrews highlighted that BCU had selected its redundancy pool in a way that specifically impacted Black employees.

Even if the Board accepts the decision to close the MA programme, it does not logically or legally follow that permanent academic posts must be made redundant. These are separate decisions requiring separate justification…

By defining the selection pool around a single course rather than the department in which staff are contractually employed, the University has created a foreseeable and disproportionate impact on Black staff.

Three key demands from BCU staff

As an illustration of the racist nature of this redundancy selection, we can look to Andrews’ actual role. He was appointed as a professor for international leadership in research, rather than Black Studies itself. Likewise, teaching on the MA accounts for less than 10% of his time. Still, he is now up for redundancy.

It is also damning that, in spite of its claims to lead in equality, diversity, and inclusion, and a public commitment to retaining black staff, BCU hasn’t carried out an equality impact assessment before making this decision.

As such, the open letter’s signatories have made three key demands of the board of governors:

1. Direct the University Executive Team to remove the threat of compulsory redundancy and end the consultation, pending a full, legal departmental level review

2. Ensure the university undertakes meaningful engagement on retaining Black Studies content in the curriculum that is accessible across the university.

3. Ensure the university explores a distance learning MA Black Studies and Global Justice.

A broader pattern

Many UK universities are currently afflicted by financial crisis, and have begun making desperate cuts to courses.

However, Andrews highlighted that BCU’s actions fit into a broader pattern of erasure of “Black knowledge and critical education” in both the UK and the US.

He wrote:

Unfortunately, the lack of support for courses based on knowledge produced by Black communities has been glaringly absent in academia.

The high-profile closures of courses like the MRes in the History of Africa and the African Diaspora, and redundancy of Professor Hakim Adi at the University of Chichester… are indicative of a worrying trend.

Advertisement

In the US there is an attack on Black intellectual thought, in the UK there is so little of it on offer in higher education that the bigger problem is neglect. When we do manage to offer such courses they should be nurtured, not stamped out at the earliest opportunity.

With fascism and the far right on the rise again, both at home and abroad, attacks on the inclusion and knowledge-production of marginalised communities are also increasing.

In making its threats against Black Studies, BCU has demonstrated that its knee-jerk reaction to financial pressure is to pass the buck to Black staff.

University management must act now to show that its commitments to EDI and Black employees were more than mere words, and that its principles will not evaporate at the first sign of a political shift.

Featured image via Getty Images

By Alex/Rose Cocker

Source link

According to Labour insiders, health secretary Wes Streeting will resign and launch his bid to topple Keir Starmer tomorrow, following a terse 16-minute meeting with Starmer at No 10 today. It would appear those who thought the monarch was visibly just going through the motions of his ‘king’s speech’ today were right.

As Skwawkbox predicted earlier, the bid was only delayed to spare the king’s ’embarrassment’ at having to deliver the supposed ‘plan for government’ on behalf of a PM facing an ouster. As also predicted yesterday, Streeting is rushing through his bid because he and his supporters know he would stand no chance against Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham. Burnham needs time to get into a parliamentary seat before he can make any challenge.

The bid comes after former ‘Tinge’ MP Chuka Umunna visited Downing Street on behalf of an Israel-supporting US banking giant that is demanding a right-wing replacement for Starmer. Streeting has accepted huge donations from the UK Israel lobby and will, according to the latest polling, destroy the rotting carcass of ‘Labour’.

According to that analysis, in the next election a Wes Streeting-led Labour will retain only around five seats from the more than 400 it ‘won’ in 2024 with the help of Farage’s Reform UK ‘party’.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

TV cameras posted on Downing Street yesterday happened to catch an interesting development and none of them even noticed. They were there in hopes of news of Keir Starmer’s imminent resignation. Instead, amid the ‘bubble’ soundbites, they caught defunct former Labour and Tinge party MP Chuka Umunna entering No 10.

Number 10 claimed that Umunna was not there in connection with Starmer’s tenure, but as part of his ‘routine’ visits on behalf of US finance giant JP Morgan. It’s interesting enough, if unsurprising, that a US corporate lobbyist has ‘routine’ access to the UK prime minister. But even more interesting when, in response to Starmer’s imminent demise, Umunna’s boss has just demanded that the UK government stay hard right when he goes.

Ransom demands?

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon said yesterday, 12 May 2026, that his bank will cancel £3bn of investment in the UK if Starmer’s replacement is “hostile to banks”. The connection may have escaped the notice (or at least comment) of UK ‘mainstream media. But it didn’t escape the attention of everyone:

Even more worryingly, Dimon is a firm supporter of Israel and of the illegal US-Israel war on Iran.

Few would doubt that Starmer – or, in this case, his handlers trying to rig who replaces him – will sell out to Big Finance and/or the Israel lobby in a heartbeat. It seems that both have access at will, right at the heart of the matter.

Just when the needs and interests of the UK and its people should be front, centre and exclusively in the minds of those clinging on in Number 10.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

On Thursday 14 May, Reform UK is fighting a by-election in South Gloucestershire. Or it was, anyway. Reform has now withdrawn support for candidate Paul Heyward, with no time left for the party to field an alternative.

Heyward was binned after it emerged he had suggested someone shoot Kier Starmer on his since-deleted X account. Given that Heyward’s comments first came to light in April, the question is: why did it take so long to give him the boot?

Reform candidate Paul Heyward, from Winterbourne faces questions over posting 'Somebody shoot this ****' about PM
He has since deleted his account on Xhttps://t.co/siYQfBzVvP

— dave lawrence (@dave43law) April 29, 2026

Another one gone

Reform announced it had withdrawn support for Heyward on Tuesday 12 May – two days before the by-election. This means Heyward’s name will still be on the ballot, but if elected, he will not represent Reform. Given this, it’s unclear if he’ll want to sit as an independent or if he’ll immediately resign (should he win). The only other candidate is the Green Party’s Monica Maggs.

As reported by Bristol Live, Heyward’s other problematic posts include:

• Calling Ed Miliband a “mong” (an old-fashioned ableist slur);
• Describing himself as “anti Islam”;
• Being opposed to immigration and transgender people.

Heyward joins a long list of Reform councillors who’ve jumped or been pushed since the 2025 local elections:

Reform UK Councillors Gone: Updated

Paul Heyward has been suspended for social media posts.

Advertisement

Kicked Out
Brian Black
Oliver Bradshaw
Paul Thomas
Bob Ford
Bill Barratt
Ed Hill
James Regan
Mark Broadhurst
Paul Bean
Adam Smith
Daniel Taylor
John Allen
Nicole Brooke
Patrick…

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) May 13, 2026

Perhaps the most surprising thing here is that Reform actually suspended him. As we reported in the runup to the local elections, Reform ran many candidates who said even worse things than Heyward with no action taken:

• Another Reform candidate praises Oswald Moseley – a rite of party initiation?
• Reform candidate wants to ‘tear down’ the NHS
• Another Reform candidate has praised Enoch Powell
• Reform welcomes ‘shoot the p*kis’ scandal ex-Tory
• Reform UK accused of ‘nil vetting’ as another racist candidate exposed

Low quality candidates

While we’re no fans of Keir Starmer, it’s obviously over the line to call for his murder. It’s true that social media has a desensitising effect, which means people fail to realise their words have weight, but that’s no excuse for someone who wants to run for public office.

The people representing us locally and nationally should be of the highest calibre. When it comes to Heyward, however, the man is clearly thinking about a different sort of calibre altogether.

Featured image via The Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

Usually the kiss of death, although Streeting’s going to take matters into his own hands anyway…

Source link

Calamitous US ‘secretary of war’ Pete Hegseth has launched a Pentagon investigation into a US senator for supposedly disclosing classified information. However, the information had already been made public by Hegseth himself under oath.

Hegseth said he ordered the investigation into Senator Mark Kelly after Kelly discussed massive US munitions expenditure against Iran during a TV interview. But Hegseth had already disclosed the information in April during sworn testimony to the UN.

Hegseth accuses Kelly of being a tell-tale

Following his equally hopeless master’s example, Hegseth took to social media to deride Kelly, accusing him of “blabbing” about a classified briefing.

“Captain” Mark Kelly strikes again.

Now he’s blabbing on TV (falsely & dumbly) about a *CLASSIFIED* Pentagon briefing he received.

Advertisement

Did he violate his oath…again? @DeptofWar legal counsel will review. https://t.co/mPBZHxZqpr

— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) May 10, 2026

Kelly, a former military officer, responded promptly with a restrained but ruthless put-down including a clip of Hegseth’s testimony.

We had this conversation in a public hearing a week ago and you said it would take “years” to replenish some of these stockpiles. That’s not classified, it’s a quote from you. This war is coming at a serious cost and you and the president still haven’t explained to the American… https://t.co/q3wX9AjRzO pic.twitter.com/5q7Gg81Xtg

— Senator Mark Kelly (@SenMarkKelly) May 11, 2026

Advertisement

Pickled beef

Hegseth has been repeatedly accused of habitual heavy drinking and even being drunk in public, so maybe he just forgot.

But he has had it in for Kelly for months, including ordering an investigation into Kelly in November 2025 for “serious allegations of misconduct”. Hegseth has also tried to remove or reduce Kelly’s military pension for highlighting Hegseth’s failures. The move was blocked, at least temporarily, by judges as an attack on Kelly’s free speech rights.

Record of contempt (and more drinking)

Hegseth’s woeful record is not limited to his disastrous war on Iran at the orders of Donald Trump (and Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu).

• He is a fan of torture with white-supremacist tattoos.
• He has accused serving US troops injured in an Iranian drone attack of lying about the lack of protection provided for them.
• He quoted fake bible verses during a speech to US troops and told them that their job is to bring about the Second Coming.
• He gloated about the “fun” of the US’ unprovoked and illegal sinking of an unarmed ship in international waters and Iranian ships.

And, of course, there’s (alleged) drinking. This has been posited as the reason for Hegseth’s bizarre, self-humiliating rant against US media for making him and his underlings look like “the bad guys”.

When he was a Fox News host, he was accused of repeated drunken behaviour.

He has even been accused of embarrassing his kids in a drunken rant on camera at the White House ‘egg roll’.

@therecount We’re this one —> #petehegseth #easter #easteregg #whitehouse #military #signal #groupchat #cringe #cringey #cringetok #kidsoftiktok #funnykids #fyp #news #politics #political #politicalnews #politicaltiktok ♬ original sound – therecount

The world is being wrecked by incompetent, petulant people of questionable mental capacity, and not even their own side is safe from them.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

New global analysis reveals 790 recorded attacks in 2025 against people raising concerns about business-related risks and harms. This is the highest figure in the past five years, equivalent to more than two attacks per day on average. And it includes 53 deaths.

The Business and Human Rights Centre published the research. It records attacks against people speaking out about corporate conduct across 80 countries and almost every sector. These range from multinational technology firms and mining corporations to renewable energy companies and agricultural producers.

In 2025, the companies and / or projects linked to the highest number of attacks were:

• The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (oil and gas).
• Grasberg mine (mining).
• Leonardo (defence).
• Cobre Panamá (mining).
• Dinant (agribusiness).

160 companies linked to attacks

Those who experienced attacks raised human rights concerns about 160 companies headquartered in 37 countries. This points to the very clear human cost of irresponsible business practice.

Companies headquartered in China (47 attacks), USA (43), UK (41), France (41), Tanzania (40) and Uganda (40) were connected with attacks more frequently than companies from any other countries.

Meanwhile, industries connected with land use and environmental harm continue to be the most dangerous. Mining, fossil fuels and agribusiness are connected to the highest number of attacks.

There was a significant proportion of lethal violence, with 53 people killed for speaking out against corporate conduct.

Overall, the most common tactic was judicial harassment (52%), including arrests, detention, criminalisation and strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). SLAPPs see powerful individuals or corporations misusing legal action to silence, intimidate and financially exhaust critics.

Christen Dobson, co-head of the Civic Freedoms & Human Rights Defenders Programme, said:

The attacks we recorded in 2025 point to a story about global power: who holds it, how it is exercised and what happens when people challenge it.

Those speaking out against corporate risks and harms are often portrayed as obstacles to progress when, in reality, they are its architects. They are leaders in protecting our natural environments, democracies and the health of our planet. They are our early warning systems: they expose risks before they become crises, they defend ecosystems before they collapse, and they challenge injustices before they become entrenched.

When people raising concerns about corporate harms are attacked – through intimidation, legal threats, or physical violence – these are not a series of isolated incidents, but a global pattern of retaliation against people exercising freedom of expression and advocating for rights-respecting economies.

These voices also provide vital information to businesses, without which companies and their investors risk remaining unaware about the risks embedded within their supply chains.

This often leads to increased risk of conflict, delays and financial losses, which could be avoided by ensuring respect for human rights and working towards shared prosperity with people affected by their operations.

Advertisement

The increasing overlap between governments exploiting national security rhetoric to violate rights and corporate influence on governments, amplified by digital technologies used to restrict civic space, is heightening risks worldwide.

And it’s highlighting the urgent need for companies to adopt and implement zero-tolerance policies for attacks on those speaking against corporate harm.

The energy transition at risk

The findings are particularly significant for companies and investors involved in the energy transition. 42 attacks were against those raising concerns about at least one of the nearly 300 mines used for transition mineral mining.

Two of the top five projects or companies associated with the highest number of attacks in 2025 were mines extracting copper, which is used in wind turbines, solar panels, electrical grid infrastructure and electric vehicle charging stations and motors.

Mining has consistently been the most dangerous sector, with 181 attacks recorded in 2025 against people speaking about abuses. Only five mining companies have a policy commitment to zero tolerance for attacks, with none of these policies meeting expected criteria.

Meanwhile, people safeguarding the environment are among those most at risk, which jeopardises an energy transition that is fair and inclusive for all. An overwhelming majority of attacks (75%) targeted people protecting the climate, land and environment, while Indigenous Peoples experienced 30% of attacks, despite making up just six per cent of the global population.

Hannah Matthews, Civic Freedoms and Human Rights Defenders researcher and database coordinator, said:

Fast tracking business projects without meaningfully consulting with people affected is a key driver of increasing conflict, losing public trust and derailing the just energy transition.

Sustainability and long-term value depend on a fundamental fact: operating in environments where defenders are attacked, civic freedoms are restricted and democracy is weakened significantly increases risk, undermines market stability, and erodes the conditions businesses depend on to thrive.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Source link