Politics
Pep Guardiola leaves Manchester City after 10 special years
Pep Guardiola’s final match at the Etihad felt like a punctuation mark rather than a spectacle. He chose a day that honoured staff, academy graduates, and long‑serving players, rather than chasing one last headline.
The tone was controlled, personal and unmistakably Guardiola: detail‑driven, human‑centred and low on theatrics.
The farewell
Manchester City fielded an experimental side and the result mattered less than the people on the pitch. That selection underlined a simple point: Guardiola treated the club as a project of stewardship, not a stage for self‑promotion. The final day was about the club’s story and the people who helped write it.
There were embraces in the tunnel, visible emotion from players, and a stadium that recognised a decade of change. Guardiola’s walk around the pitch, the nods to staff and the quiet exchanges with former players felt like the real currency of his exit – relationships, not rhetoric.
Pep is Palestinian
In the months before his farewell at City, Guardiola used public platforms to speak about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and to express solidarity with Palestinian civilians. He appeared at a charity event in Barcelona wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh and spoke about the suffering of children in Gaza.
He also told reporters he would continue to “stand up” for Palestine and to speak out about civilian suffering, framing his comments in humanitarian terms rather than as a policy prescription. Those remarks were made in a pre‑match news conference and were widely shared across social media platforms.
Beyond trophies and records, Guardiola’s legacy is institutional: a coaching culture, an academy pathway, and a tactical blueprint that reshaped how City and many rivals prepare and play. He leaves a club with deep structures aligned to a clear footballing identity.
Influence beyond the Etihad
Guardiola’s tactical influence extends beyond City’s trophy cabinet. His approach to space, pressing, and ball circulation has been studied and copied. Coaches across Europe have borrowed elements of his methods; clubs have restructured training and recruitment to mirror the systems he favoured.
That diffusion of ideas is part of his legacy: a coach who didn’t just win, but who altered how the game is played and prepared at the highest level.
At the same time, Guardiola’s tenure exposed the limits of any single approach. Opponents found ways to counter his teams, and the Premier League’s competitive balance meant that dominance required constant renewal. Guardiola’s willingness to adapt, to rotate, to experiment, to recalibrate was as important as his tactical orthodoxy.
What next for City and Guardiola
For Manchester City, the immediate task is continuity. The club has planned for life after Guardiola, and the structures he helped build should smooth the transition. The challenge will be maintaining the standards he set without simply trying to replicate his exact methods. City’s next manager will inherit a club with deep resources, a strong academy, and a clear identity. The question is how they will make it their own.
For Guardiola, the break is a rare one. After nearly two decades of continuous management, he has chosen to step away. Whether he returns to management in the near future is uncertain. What is clear is that he leaves with options and with a record that will make him a sought-after figure in world football.
The end of an era
Guardiola’s exit is best read as the close of a chapter that combined relentless professional standards with visible personal convictions. The final day was emblematic: modest in spectacle, rich in human detail, and framed by a manager who used his platform to call attention to suffering beyond football. The next chapter for City will test whether those standards and that sense of responsibility endure without the man who set them.
Featured image via Getty/Lewis Storey
By Faz Ali
Politics
Jack Osbourne Defends Plans To Create AI Avatar Of Late Father Ozzy
Jack Osbourne has jumped to the defence of a new project recreating his later father Ozzy’s likeness using AI.
Last week, Jack and the rest of the Osbourne family announced plans to create a digital avatar based on the Black Sabbath frontman’s image in collaboration with tech companies Hyperreal and Proto Hologram.
Appearing at the advertising industry event Licensing Expo alongside his mum Sharon and sister Kelly, he enthused: “It’s kind of scary how it’s really very accurate. He will exist digitally as himself for as long as we have computers.”
Jack continued: “Technology has come such a long way to where it’s almost drag and drop. You could shoot a template for a commercial [and] literally prompt what you want Digital Ozzy to do in that commercial and you just drop it in. It’s that simple now.”
Sharon also noted that the family plan to take the digital avatar “all around the world”, allowing fans to have the opportunity to “talk to him and he will talk back”.
Meanwhile, Hyperreal also told Billboard last week these avatars would be popping up on interactive, life-size touchscreen devices at venues across both sides of the Atlantic.

However, with AI being such a contentious issue across creative industries, these announcements were met with criticism from some, which Jack addressed in a YouTube live-stream.
“It’s going to be so tasteful what we’re doing,” the former I’m A Celebrity campmate insisted (as reported by The Guardian). “It’s not gonna be fucking lame.”
He added: “This isn’t just like hooking up an image of my dad to ChatGPT. This is some high-level technology that we’re gonna be working with, and it’s gonna feel very real, and it’s kind of wild how it will be utilised.”
This isn’t the first time that digital recreations of Ozzy’s likeness have ruffled feathers, though.
Shortly after Ozzy’s death last year, Sir Rod Stewart raised eyebrows when he made use of an AI video in one of his live shows, depicting the rocker in heaven meeting Michael Jackson, Prince, Whitney Houston, Amy Winehouse, Tupac Shakur, Freddie Mercury and Tina Turner, among others.
Politics
The Best Frying Pans Of 2026, From Ceramic To Stainless Steel And Non-Stick
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
Is there anything worse than a pan whose non-stick fails you after a few short years? Or buying a brand new pan and realising it’s not compatible with your hob?
As someone who’s experienced both, let me tell you: it’s not a situation you want to find yourself in.
As a kitchen essential, a great frying pan can make the difference between food that you want to feast on with your eyes as much as your mouth, and an undercooked, soggy mess.
Too many times have I spent upwards of £100 on a new frying pan only for it to get scratched by the whisper of a utensil.
And I’m sick of it! If you’re anything like me, you’ll want a pan that is not only efficient to cook with, but enhances the flavour of your food, and is easy to wipe clean or chuck in the dishwasher.
Whether you’re looking to upgrade your culinary prowess, or simply want a new pan to add to your collection, I’ve found the best frying pans available on the market right now.
What to consider when buying a frying pan
- Hob: Not all pans are compatible with induction hobs, so you’ll need to check before buying
- Material: Different materials cook, well, differently. Stainless steel pans heat up more evenly than ceramic or non-stick, and can reach higher temperatures, making them more suitable for searing. But, similar to cast iron pans, require treating to make sure they’re non-stick.
Ceramic pans are non-stick, which makes them great for cooking eggs. - Size: You might want to buy a mixture of sizes for every purpose.
- Dishwasher-friendly: Some pans can be cleaned in the dishwasher, but most must be cleaned by hand. Make sure you check this before you buy a pan if you have a preference, and also before you chuck it in the machine.
Difference between non-stick, ceramic, stainless steel, and cast iron pans
Traditional non-stick
- Very easy to use, releases food
- Versatile
- Often cheaper than ceramic, stainless steel or cast iron pans
- Some brands use toxic chemicals in the coating, which when damaged can seep into your food. Research each brand before buying to avoid
- Scratched with metal utensils.
Ceramic
- Easy to clean
- Fewer chemicals than traditional non-stick
- Can use on high heats, heats up quickly
- Versatile
- Eco-friendly
- Hand wash only
- Might not be as durable as stainless steel pans.
Stainless steel
- Don’t contain chemicals like traditional non-stick
- Heats up quickly and evenly
- Durable, they often last for life
- Can be non-stick (but require treating)
- Lighter than cast iron
- Dishwasher-safe
- Takes work to figure out how much heat and fat is needed to make it non-stick.
Cast iron
- Retains heat well
- Non-stick when seasoned
- Heavy
- Needs to be seasoned to prevent rust and make it non-stick
How I chose the best frying pans

As someone who cooks every day, I’m always thinking about how well my frying pan is performing. I tested several of the frying pans on this list, thinking about what they were best for cooking, how much maintenance they required, how non-stick they were compared with what they claimed to be, their size, whether they were dishwasher friendly and whether they were induction hub friendly.
Those I didn’t test myself, I crowdsourced from friends, family, and colleagues. I also read through thousands of reviews to see which were the best rated against the above criteria.
The best frying pans to buy in 2026
Best ceramic coated stainless steel pan
For the best of both worlds, Hexclad pans blend stainless steel with ceramic coating for pans that can be used on a high heat and don’t require treating. Designed in collab with Gordon Ramsay himself, this frying pan can just as easily sear as it can be wiped down. As if by magic, its handle won’t heat up, while the body can withstand up to 480 degrees in the oven. Even better, it can be popped in the dishwasher when you’re done, and you won’t even need to treat it!
Type: Stainless steel pan with ceramic coating
Size: 30cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: Yes
Best for every day use
If you’re anything like me, you’ll be suspicious of anything that comes across your Instagram feed. And I’ll admit, this all singing, all dancing pan does sound too good to be true, but after two years of using it I can confirm it’s my go-to for everyday cooking. Thanks to the ceramic coating, it’s supremely non-stick. After a couple of years there’s a slight decrease in it’s non-stickiness, but nothing that means I can’t cook eggs. As well as coming in a range of gorgeous colours, it has a ton of practical accessories like a lid, a spatula that slots onto that little nub on the handle, and a steaming basket for everything from pasta to making a set custard.
Type: Aluminium pan with non-stick ceramic coating
Size: 26.7cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: No
Best budget non-stick
My grandma swears by Tefal for cooking on the hob, and every time I’ve ever wanted a pan she’s bought me this one. It comes in at just £10, and is as non-stick as they come. While it scratches more easily than my Our Place one, the fact it’s such a budget option means I’ll always come back to it when I need a replacement.
Type: Teflon non-stick
Size: 24.8cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: No
Best enamel-coated cast iron
If you’ve ever held a Le Creuset pot, you’ll have an idea of how study this pan is. Designed for sautéing, the cast iron base doesn’t require much heat to get things going, and it’ll sear everything from a hunk of protein to delicate greens perfectly. Although it has an enamel coating, it still needs to be seasoned, but eventually it will build up a non-stick resistance. That wooden handle will also make your life much easier by not burning your hands while you toss away.
Type: Enamel-coated cast iron
Size: 28cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: No
With over 1,000 five-star reviews, it’s clear why this pan is such a fan favourite. It’s forged, which means the base is intended to be extremely scratch-resistant, and will last longer than other pans. You’ll even get a 25-year guarantee to prove it. It can go in oven up to 260 degrees, making it ideal for broiling or grilling, but is also induction hob and dishwasher-friendly. Check all our boxes, why don’t you?
Type: Non-stick
Size: 22cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: Yes
Best titanium pan
By some miracle, Our Place has found a way to make a titanium pan non-stick without toxic chemicals. Its NoCo nonstick interior is free from lead, PFAS, PFTE, and PFOA, and its titanium surface is 300 times more durable than stainless steel. Not only is it suitable for every kind of hob, but it can hold its own in up to 535 degree heat. To prove its excellence, Our Place is offering a lifetime guarantee on this pan. Yep, even after you put it in the dishwasher.
Type: Non-stick
Size: 31.6cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: Yes
Best small non-stick pan
When you’re cooking for one, it seems pointless to dirty a whole pan. When it’s dishwasher-safe, though, it’s another matter entirely. Perfectly sized for eggs or meals for one, this pan promises to be flake-free and five times more durable than regular non-stick pans. Thanks to the forged aluminium base, it heats up quickly and evenly, and it’s so non-stick you don’t need much oil or butter to start a meal off. Even more impressive is the fact it comes with a lifetime warranty, especially when it costs just £30 to begin with.
Type: Non-stick
Size: 20cm
Induction friendly: Yes
Dishwasher friendly: Yes
Politics
Dog Heatstroke Symptoms: Full List And What To Do Next
As we humans struggle to fall asleep and wrestle with withering lawns in the heatwave, it’s important to remember that our animals are struggling in the same blistering temperatures.
Sometimes, the RSPCA said, overheating can lead to potentially “fatal” heatstroke in dogs, whose risk of heatstroke rises at temperatures over 20°C.
Some of the symptoms of overheating and heatstroke can show up in your dog’s mouth first, they added.
Signs of heatstroke that can show in your dog’s mouth
1) Panting
Dogs pant more often the hotter they are, as that’s their primary cooling mechanism.
Dogs Trust said that heavy panting and/or changes to your dog’s breathing can be a sign of heatstroke.
2) Red, pink, or purple gums
Yes, sometimes, this is a dental issue. But the RSPCA added that if it’s “coupled with panting and heavy breathing, red gums can occur when a dog is overheating”.
And the Blue Cross listed “purple gums or red skin” in their list of heatstroke symptoms for dogs.
Dogs Trust, meanwhile, said you should look out for bright pink or red gums or lips.
3) Sticky, heavy drooling and/or dribbling
Per the RSPCA, a dog that’s drooling more than usual and/or has thicker and stickier drool than you’re used to, this can be another sign of heatstroke.
The Blue Cross also said a dog with heatstroke may start dribbling.
4) Vomiting
The Blue Cross, RSPCA, and Dogs Trust all list this as a symptom of overheating and possible heatstroke.
The RSPCA added that heatstroke can also cause diarrhoea; if this is bloody, that can be a sign that heatstroke is more severe.
5) Noisy breathing
Dogs that begin breathing more quickly or heavily than usual could be facing heatstroke, the RSPCA said. Noisy breathing can also be a sign, especially among flat-faced breeds like pugs and French bulldogs.
What are the other symptoms of heatstroke in dogs?
- A dry nose,
- Infrequent urination,
- A higher than usual heart rate,
- Shaking and shivering due to muscle spasms,
- Seizures, especially in epileptic dogs,
- Collapse,
- Confusion or disorientation,
- Tiredness,
- Sunken eyes,
- Weakness,
- Red skin,
- Being wobbly on their feet.
What if I think my dog might have heatstroke?
The RSPCA stressed that owners should “cool first, transport second”. In other words, it’s important to get your dog’s temperature down before you take them to a vet.
Remove them from their hot environment and stop any exercise, the charity added. Move them into existing shade, or create some temporary shade if none is available.
Pour water on their body but not their head, focusing on their stomach, neck, and thighs. “Submerge their body in cool water if available (such as a paddling pool or stream, as long as the water temperature is cooler than the dog),” the RSPCA added, but don’t do this with an unconscious, sick, or older dog.
Take them to the vet once they’ve cooled down, ensuring the vehicle you’re bringing them in is cool, well-ventilated, and has easy access to water. Open your windows and/or use the air conditioning.
Stay calm, the RSPCA continued, and ring ahead to let the vet know about the urgency of the situation.
Politics
Cooking Once A Week Could Slash Dementia Risk
By 2024, Alzheimer’s Society said that they expect the number of people with dementia in the UK to rise to 1.4 million.
We still don’t fully understand how conditions like Alzheimer’s develop. But researchers think that up to 45% of dementia cases are “potentially preventable” by addressing 14 lifestyle factors.
These include more obvious choices, like not smoking and staying active. And a new paper published in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health had suggested that another, simpler step – cooking, even as little as once a week – could significantly reduce dementia risk, too.
Cooking once a week appeared to reduce risk by as much as 67%
In this research, which involved 10,978 over-65s, the study authors compared people’s self-reported cooking rates and skill levels to their dementia incidence over time.
They tracked them for six years.
Compared to cooking less than once a week, cooking once a week was linked to a 23% lower dementia risk among men and 27% for women.
For those who weren’t experienced cooks, making a homemade meal once a week was associated with a 67% lower likelihood.
People who cooked at least five times a week saw the best results, however. And those who were highly competent in the kitchen also saw benefits, though these didn’t seem to rise with cooking frequency.
These findings seemed to hold true after accounting for other factors we know can affect dementia risk, like income level and education.
“Creating an environment where people can cook meals when they are older may be important for the prevention of dementia,” the study authors concluded.
Expertise might lower dementia risk
A birdwatching study found that those who were really, really skilled at the hobby saw lower dementia risk than less-skilled peers. “High-level expertise in a complex hobby can provide a protective ‘cognitive reserve’ as we age,” the authors wrote.
However, speaking to the Science Media Centre, Dr Susan Kohlhaas, an Executive Director of Research and Partnerships at Alzheimer’s Research UK, stressed that this was an observational study that couldn’t prove causation.
She added, “People who cook regularly may also have healthier diets, be more physically active, and be in better overall health, all of which are linked to better brain health. It’s also possible the reverse is true: people with early memory and thinking problems might lose the ability or motivation to cook, leading them to cook less often”.
She also noted that though the study lasted six years, participants only reported their cooking habits once.
She continued that while this study may not be conclusive, “there is good evidence that keeping active, eating well, and staying socially connected can help support brain health”.
Politics
Iran condemns new wave of US strikes as peace talks hang in balance
Iran has slammed a new wave of US strikes in the besieged nation’s south. Meanwhile Donald Trump has demanded various countries normalise relations with Israel as a condition of ending his failed war. Yet several expert voices have said that the US has already lost the war, with Trump in no position to make demands.
Middle East Eye reported:
Iran’s foreign ministry accused the US of violating ceasefire agreement after Washington carried out strikes south of the country.
The ministry said:
Undoubtedly, the Islamic Republic of Iran will not leave any act of mischief unanswered and will not hesitate in defending the country’s integrity.
Drop Site News reported that Iranian sailors and fishermen were killed:
IRGC-linked Fars News reported explosions in Bandar Abbas and similar sounds near Sirik and Jask a few hours… https://t.co/gUl45sMQrh pic.twitter.com/b8yMO4IDEF
— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) May 26, 2026
NEW: Iranian sailors and fishermen were killed today after U.S. forces struck vessels near Bandar Abbas, according to reports and images circulating on social media.
US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. And the UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.
The US has achieved none of its original war aims. Iran predictably closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil channel, once attacked – creating a global energy crisis. Far from being defeated, Iran has said the war will continue until “the enemy’s inevitable and permanent humiliation, disgrace, regret, and surrender”. Trump came to power on an anti-war ‘America First’ ticket. He now faces worldwide humiliation.
It is widely felt that Trump is groping for an off-ramp from his own war. Drop Site‘s Murtaza Hussein posted on X:
If Trump continues the war he will have to deal with an escalating global economic crisis with no clear victory or exit strategy. If he ends it however he will have to deal with backlash from the ruthless Israel Lobby that will continue inflicting political harm on him for the…
— Murtaza Hussain (@MazMHussain) May 26, 2026
Iran holds the cards amid Trump’s desperation
Meanwhile, Middle East Eye editor David Hearst wrote that Iran “holds all the cards”:
however tortuous the path, and even if this deal fails and Trump decides to attack Iran for a third time, it is brutally clear that the US has just lost another war in the Middle East – its sixth in 25 years.
Iran has all the cards, chiefly the Strait of Hormuz, but also the deterrence its drones and missiles have achieved over its Gulf neighbours – and other cards still it has yet to play, like the closure of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait at the mouth of the Red Sea. Trump has none.
Yet Trump has continued to make improbable demands more suited to a man who is winning. For example, he has insisted that a number of Middle East states sign the Abraham Accords. The Accords bind signatories into normalising relations with Israel.
Trump said:
After all the work done by the United States to try and pull this very complex puzzle together, it should be mandatory that all of these Countries, at a minimum, simultaneously, sign onto the Abraham Accords.
Those Countries discussed are Saudi Arabia, The United Arab Emirates (already a Member!), Qatar, Pakistan, Turkiye, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain (already a Member!).
Pakistan, which is acting as peace broker between the US and Iran, has rejected the idea entirely. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said, referring to Israel:
How will you sit down with those people whose word cannot be trusted.
We have a very clear stance that this is not acceptable to us.
Trump seems to be oscillating between desperation and brazen posturing. The self-proclaimed ‘master of the deal’ seems to be completely incapable of finding such a thing. That is one thing on a reality TV boardroom. It is quite another when it is the lives of Iranian civilians are reduced to bargaining chips in Trump’s failed imperial adventure.
Featured image via Getty/Andrew Harnik
By Joe Glenton
Politics
Former UK cyber-security chief slams Farage’s ‘Russian hacker’ claim as “entirely without merit”
Nigel Farage’s desperate claim that a Russian hacker leaked his financial records to the Guardian is “without any merit”, according to Ciaran Martin, the founding chief executive of the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).
Over the weekend of 23 May, Farage told the Mail that Reform-employed ‘counter-espionage experts’ found “sophisticated hallmarks” of “hostile state actors” behind the alleged data-security breach.
Farage is begging us not to look at the donation
The ‘Russian hack’ gambit was the Reform leader’s latest attempt at a distraction from his undeclared £5m ‘gift’ from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne. Farage originally claimed the gift was for ‘security’ before changing his tune, calling the money a ‘reward’ for his hard work campaigning for Brexit.
Whatever the purpose, Farage purchased, in cash, a £1.4m house mere months after Harborne’s kind gesture. In the same month he also put in applications to redevelop another Kent property. Likewise, later that year, Farage’s partner Laure Ferrari splashed £885,000 up front on a Clacton property.
Apparently, this was too much corruption even for the UK political establishment. The parliamentary standards commissioner has confirmed that they’re investigating Farage for a potential breach of the members’ code of conduct. Fingers crossed, this could even end up triggering a by-election in Clacton-on-Sea.
Understandably, given the potentially massive ramifications, Reform’s usually limelight-loving leader has been ducking interviews left, right, and centre. And then, of course, there’s his claim that he only started talking about the dodgy £5m because of a Russian hack.
‘The sophisticated hallmarks of a nation state actor’
On 23 May, Farage stated that counter-espionage experts in the employ of his party had uncovered signs that Moscow-linked hackers used spear phishing techniques to access his bank accounts, phone, and email. In the Mail, a Reform source claimed the alleged incident:
bore all the sophisticated hallmarks of a nation state actor using destabilisation techniques in the run-up to this month’s local elections.
You heard it straight from the horse’s mouth, folks. The Russians are using every tool at their disposal to stop Reform from taking control of Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council. If only Putin had known that he could just wait for the far-right party to take itself out.
According to Farage, just four people were even aware of the £5m gift. However, as the Canary’s Willem Moore reported, no one actually cares how the financial records leaked. Instead, people are very concerned with the fact that the far-right stooge has failed to provide any evidence for this alleged hack.
‘He’s not produced a shred of evidence’
Now, ex-NCSC chief Ciaran Martin has come forward to state that Farage’s wild claims would have massive repercussions for the UK’s policies regarding Russia. If, that is, any of the story were actually true. Martin explained that:
An aspiring prime minister has essentially claimed that Russia has launched an unprecedentedly aggressive intervention – a malicious intervention – in British politics, and he’s not produced a shred of evidence to support that claim.
He’s made a serious foreign policy and national security allegation which if true would have massive implications for British policy towards Russia.
It is a very, very serious thing to allege. It would be a national security issue. If it is true, the government should be in emergency session in COBR [Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms] right now considering their response to the most serious Russian intervention in internal British affairs for years.
On the contrary, the Guardian reported its understanding that Farage hasn’t even bothered to ask for the NCSC’s help with his scary (and definitely 100% real) Russian hacker yet.
Russians ‘don’t leave a little flag’
Martin was also quick to call out the outlandish nature of Reform’s claim to have employed ‘counter-espionage experts’. Likewise, he also questioned how exactly they arrived at the conclusion that ‘Moscow did it’. Martin explained that the Russians “don’t leave a little flag on a device”:
To take one phone and say my phone, email and bank account has been hacked, and it’s got the imprint of the Russian state, that’s a hell of a technical leap to do that on the basis of a single device analysis. […]
You need detailed technical evidence, some of which is sometimes not even available to the private sector. That is why for an accusation of this magnitude the only right port of call is the British security services, and in this case, specifically the National Cyber Security Centre in GCHQ [Government Communications Headquarters].
Martin didn’t want to rule out the possibility of a hack completely. That’s probably fair, given that (like the rest of the country) he hasn’t seen any of Reform’s evidence yet. However, he was unequivocal on the point that Farage – if he is telling the truth – is making a pig’s ear of the incident:
What he has described would not just be hacking by Russia, but what we call a hack-and-leak operation, which is a different thing.
It is way more serious because it violates international norms, and it’s a direct intervention aimed at destabilising our democracy and our politics in a way that spying isn’t. […]
An aspiring prime minister should treat it with the utmost seriousness and cooperate fully with the National Cyber Security Centre and any other relevant authority; otherwise you should not make these accusations, because they’re way too serious to just be bandied around.
Lying, incompetent, or both?
So, let’s run through things, just to sum it up. Farage claimed that Russian agents hacked his accounts to leak his financial details to the Guardian. His party’s supposed counter-espionage experts, if they exist, are apparently working at a level beyond the private sector’s actual capabilities.
In spite of public pressure, the Reform leader has provided no evidence to back up his story. It’s a massive allegation against Russia, which could have lasting effects on UK foreign policy towards the Putin administration.
However, Farage is utterly failing to treat the incident with the magnitude it deserves – he hasn’t even gone to the government agency specifically set up to handle matters of national cyber-security.
That leaves us with a simple question: is Farage lying, incompetent, or both? Personally, the Canary’s money is on ‘both’. And this is the tosser who wants to be the next prime minister? You’re having a laugh.
Featured image via Getty/Toby Melville
Politics
Peter Murrell’s shopping sprees expose the rottenness of the SNP
Peter Murrell, the ex-husband of former Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon, is set to spend a long time in prison. The former Scottish National Party chief executive (between 2001 and 2023) has pleaded guilty to embezzling over £400,000 from SNP campaign funds.
Concerns had first been raised about the SNP’s finances in October 2020 by pro-independence blogger Stuart Campbell. He had noticed that nearly £670,000 raised between 2017 and 2019 to campaign for a second independence referendum (IndyRef2) did not seem to be showing up in the SNP’s public accounts. It hadn’t been used to push for IndyRef2, so where had it gone?
In March 2021, in what is perhaps the most shameful and telling episode of the whole affair, SNP higher-ups denied three SNP officials on the party’s finance and audit committee in-depth access to the party’s accounts – an aversion to scrutiny all too typical of the SNP’s senior figures. The trio promptly resigned as a matter of principle. At a National Executive Committee meeting at the time, Sturgeon claimed that the party’s finances had never been healthier. She warned that anyone thinking of going public with concerns would be damaging the SNP.
An official complaint was then made to Police Scotland, which launched an investigation in 2021. Five years on, we now have an answer to the mystery of the missing funds. The first minister’s hubby had, to borrow Boris Johnson’s famous words, spaffed it up the wall.
It really does take a heart of stone to read Police Scotland’s 126-page indictment without laughing. We learn that Murrell wasn’t driven to nicking from the Nats by gambling debts or a drugs-and-hookers habit. No, it seems he just really liked high-end shopping. He is Imelda Marcos in tartan trews.
The big-ticket items include a Jaguar SUV for £81,000 and a luxury Niemann and Bischoff Smove 7.4e campervan, which set Murrell back £124,550. Even he seemingly realised the campervan looked a bit suspicious so, despite claiming it was to be used for campaigning, he stored it at his mother’s house in Fife. As you do.
Armed with a John Lewis catalogue and various SNP credit cards, Murrell also spent £3,232 on a Jura Giga 5 Cromo coffee machine, £2,618 on two Feuilles pepper and salt grinders, £1,990 on eight umbrellas, £1,475 on a Beatles special-edition fountain pen and rollerball, £550 on a 1:30-scale model of an Airbus helicopter… the list goes on and on. Such was the ostentatious nature of Murrell’s spending, his and Sturgeon’s famously ‘modest’ home in Glasgow must have looked like the interior of Harrods. There’s probably an exotic species or two hidden away in Nicola’s loft.
Questions (and eyebrows) are now being raised as to how Sturgeon could have been unaware that something was amiss. Her house would have been brimful with designer goods, a brand new Jag was parked outside, and a top-of-range campervan sat on her mother-in-law’s driveway. One might reasonably ask Sturgeon how she thought Murrell was funding such an outlay? Fortnum and Mason loyalty points? Scratch cards? Or perhaps it involved the never-spent campaign pot that independence campaigners and SNP members had been concerned about since 2020?
Sturgeon, who was cleared of wrongdoing by the police in 2024, has insisted this week that she had been ‘misled just as others were’. She has pointed to her husband’s £107,000 salary as her reason for thinking his spending was normal. It’s true Murrell’s earnings might explain away the two-and-a-half-grand salt-and-pepper cellars and the Helly Hanson vest sets, but a £81,000 Jag and a £125,000 campervan? As others have noted, she is guilty at the very least of being remarkably incurious.
As are other members of the SNP’s ruling clique. This includes current first minister John Swinney, a trusted adviser to Sturgeon and one of Murrell’s closest friends. Indeed, it was Swinney, during his first stint as SNP leader in 2001, who made Murrell the SNP’s chief executive. Like Sturgeon, Swinney has spoken of his shock and sense of betrayal. And, of course, he says he suspected nothing.
The whiff coming off the SNP leadership right now wouldn’t be quite so strong if this were an isolated scandal. If it could be limited to the actions of Sturgeon’s sneaky shopaholic husband. But the rot goes deeper. Since it won power in 2007 and then a Holyrood majority in 2011, the SNP has turned Scotland into what feels like a one-party state. It has governed – first under the late Alex Salmond (2007-2014) and then especially Nicola Sturgeon (2014-2023) – as a small, arrogant clique of technocrats, aided and abetted by a state-funded NGO-cracy and a civil service so pliant and submissive, it might as well have been integrated into the SNP itself.
Little wonder that SNP leadership has increasingly acted as a law unto itself, hiding and shielding itself from public accountability. We saw this during the Alex Salmond scandal a few years ago. The former SNP leader was investigated by Sturgeon’s government in 2018, following allegations of sexual assault against him. From the start, he claimed it was a politically motivated conspiracy to remove him as a threat to Sturgeon’s leadership. While these claims were unsubstantiated, a subsequent judicial review in 2019 ruled that the investigation was ‘unlawful’, ‘procedurally unfair’ and ‘tainted with apparent bias’ – the investigating officer had even had prior contact with Salmond’s accusers. Salmond was acquitted of all charges at a 2020 criminal trial.
In some ways, it was what happened afterwards that was most damning of the SNP. During a Holyrood inquiry into the Salmond affair, the government refused to hand over all the documentation related to the case, redacted Salmond’s evidence to the inquiry, and restricted what Sturgeon could be questioned about by MSPs. As then Scottish Labour leader Jackie Baillie put it at the time, ‘We are seeing that there is something rotten at the heart of the SNP, and it is poisoning our democratic institutions’.
The Salmond scandal exposed the malign traits of the SNP leadership. Its aversion to scrutiny, its defiance of accountability, and its overweening commitment to its own self-preservation. These were on show once more during Scotland’s public inquiry into the SNP’s handling of the Covid pandemic. It emerged that Sturgeon and others systematically deleted their WhatsApp messages as part of a concerted, civil service-backed effort seemingly to avoid being held to account at any future inquiry. In a telling moment, senior civil servant Ken Thomson warned his colleagues that their chat ‘is discoverable under [freedom of information]’ and wanted them to ‘know where the “clear chat” button is’. He boasted to colleagues that ‘plausible deniability are my middle names’.
The Murrell embezzlement scandal might only involve one member of the SNP, albeit an incredibly powerful one. But it’s difficult not to think of it as part of the same increasingly rotten SNP culture – of ‘plausible deniability’, accountability-dodging and an almost pathological lack of curiosity when it comes to the failings of its own. A party that has long been more committed to maintaining its grip on power and furthering its own leading individuals’ interests than in representing the interests of Scottish citizens.
Peter Murrell may no longer be able to spend campaigners’ hard-earned on designer bread bins and manicure sets, but there is still a powerful stench emanating from this decadent party. The reckoning the SNP deserves cannot come soon enough.
Tim Black is associate editor of spiked.
Politics
The Great HS2 Racket
The Department for Transport this month delivered yet more humiliating news on the HS2 railway, the high-speed rail project that first broke ground in 2011. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander explained to the House of Commons that completion of the line, now reduced to a single route between London and Birmingham, can cost between £87.7bn and £102.7bn, against an original 2012 estimate of around £33bn.
The first trains are announced not to run until, at the earliest, 2036, and full operation has fallen somewhere between 2040 and 2043, with no confirmation given that deadlines may not change further. In the interests of saving money, the high-speed trains will be slower, at only 320km/h, rather than the originally promised 360km/h.
As previous Canary coverage of Britain’s outsourcing state has set out, the temptation is to read this as a story about incompetence. To do so presumes good intentions frustrated by bad management, when the truth is that this outcome was written into the structure of the project from the beginning through the infrastructure contracts themselves.
The contract model
The story of HS2 has been one of continuous failure, and a key demonstration of the incapacity of the modern British state to execute large-scale infrastructure under the immense weight of its immobile bureaucratic machinery. Contrary to endless ministerial briefings about complex engineering challenges, Britain has not forgotten how to build railways.
As Mark Wild – the chief executive of HS2 Ltd brought in to reset the project – set out in his assessment to the Transport Secretary, the contracts operate on a ‘cost-plus’ basis, whereby contractors were paid whatever they spent with little penalty for overshooting. The Institution of Civil Engineers described the resulting arrangement as an “imbalance of power” tilted toward the construction firms. The Guardian‘s financial editor put it more plainly, noting that the companies:
rang rings around the department and its arm’s-length body.
Almost the entire long-term downside risk sat with HS2 Ltd, the public body, rather than with the firms responsible for delivery.
The consequences naturally followed from that design. Freed from the risk of their own overruns, contractors chased short-term construction schedules and juggled multiple contracts at once, in tandem with engineering problems and unforeseen difficulties that were billed back to the public. Concrete was poured and tunnels were dug before planning consent would be secured and blueprints finalised, forcing mid-construction redesign to adhere to local regulations, halting work and leaving expensive plant and labour idle.
There was, in short, no party to the contract with both the power and the reason to keep costs down. The public had the reason but not the power; the contractors had the power but not the reason.
The State as a conduit
HS2 is only the largest example of a much broader pattern. It is the clearest available illustration of a model that has governed British infrastructure since the 1990s, under which an asset-deprived state exists to funnel public funds into the hands of private capital for the continuation of fickle-profit margins, thereby absorbing risks and reaping the rewards.
Where the state nationalises, the form of nationalisation is such that it rarely means the public taking command of an asset and running it in the public interest. Rather, it means the public takes the liabilities, debts and long-term risks, while day-to-day operations, and the profit that flows from them, remains contracted to private firms.
The same logic recurs across the public sector. The railways, even after nominal return to public ownership, still run on private operators, private maintenance firms and rolling stock leased from private financiers, with the state underwriting the structure and absorbing the losses. The PFI deals struck under New Labour saddled the NHS with decades of repayments for hospitals, which it will end up paying several times over, long after the firms that built them banked the return. However the arrangement is dressed up, from one part of the public realm to the next, it works to the same end: sparing private firms the consequences of their own failures and socialising the costs to the people that fund them.
Allegations of outright fraud now hang over the HS2 supply chain. HS2 Ltd has referred a subcontractor to HMRC over claims that workers were misclassified and inflated rates charged. But the fraud, real as it may be, is the smaller scandal. The larger one is entirely legal, and describes a state that has stripped itself of the capacity to be the prime mover of the economy, contracting its capacity to build to the private sector at a price it cannot negotiate.
More workable models exist
Workable models have been shown to exist. France’s maîtrise d’ouvrage tradition keeps the public legally in command of its own projects and Italy’s contratto di rete binds multiple firms into a single transparent framework with shared risks and obligations. The barrier has never been knowing how to do this differently; it is that too many powerful people have grown comfortable with it being done badly.
The same financial logic that made HS2 a vehicle for private extraction and criminal enterprise is hardwired into the basic operation of the state. Any government that seriously proposed a plan to claw back public control over money, to build through capable public bodies rather than rent that capacity back from the market, would be met by a run on the pound, a spike in gilt yields and a familiar invocation of the spectre of Liz Truss.
The country deserves a full accounting of where the money has gone. That means a thorough investigation into the nature of HS2 contracts, the naming and holding to account of the politicians and contractors responsible, and an argument the political class has so far refused to have – namely, the wholesale overhaul of UK public contract law toward a system that is fair, transparent and flexible.
Featured image via Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
Politics
Top 10 Best Rhinoplasty Surgeon in Turkey 2026
Turkey is one of the most popular rhinoplasty locations on a global scale. The country hosts hundreds (if not thousands) of international patients every year. The reason why is pretty clear. They offer a combination of world class medical knowledge, operate using the latest technology, and they have a rich history of success in facial aesthetics.
For a whole lot of people, the journey toward a more balanced facial profile begins here, because patients seeking a nose job in Turkey now have more options than ever before.
However, the sheer volume of available clinics can make selecting the right one a pretty daunting process. As you probably know, choosing the right rhinoplasty surgeon is the single most important decision you can make as a patient.
That’s why we created this ranking list. We want to give you a fully transparent guide to finding the best rhinoplasty surgeon in Turkey for 2026.
Why Turkey Is a Global Hotspot for Rhinoplasty
The main reason why Turkey is still a leading destination for rhinoplasty in 2026 is, basically, the fact that their experts have a ton of procedural experience. They handle a much, much higher volume of nasal surgeries per year compared to Western Europe or North America. Turkish surgeons often get a career’s worth of experience in half the time.
This high demand simply leads to rapid innovation. Top clinics in Istanbul, which is the primary hub for rhinoplasty surgery, now utilize advanced techniques such as 3D imaging for pre operative planning and Piezo (ultrasonic) technology.
These innovations lead to more precise modifications to the nasal structure without the trauma that’s typically associated with traditional methods.
Furthermore, quality is strictly regulated here. Top facilities have to keep their JCI accreditation and Ministry of Health authorization when it comes to quality benchmarks, which, in fact, rival any Western institution, and all that at a fraction of the cost compared to the UK or USA.
How We Selected the Top 10 Rhinoplasty Surgeons
We want to make sure that this list serves as a reliable editorial resource, and so, we went with a transparent methodology to evaluate leading rhinoplasty surgeons currently practicing in Turkey. We checked each of them based on a strict set of quality benchmarks:
- Years of experience and the total volume of successful rhinoplasty procedures performed;
- The quality, consistency, and natural appearance of their before and after gallery;
- International board certifications and active memberships in prestigious global aesthetic societies;
- Verified patient reviews and testimonials from independent platforms;
- Specialization in complex cases, such as revision surgery or ethnic rhinoplasty;
- Adherence to international safety standards and the use of an advanced surgical technique like Piezo or 3D imaging and post operative care.
Top 10 Best Rhinoplasty Surgeons in Turkey 2026
Check out our overview of the leading specialists who are currently defining the standards of nasal surgery in Turkey.
#1 Dr. Ufuk Durgun – Cosmedica Aesthetic
Dr. Ufuk Durgun is a rhinoplasty surgeon with a whole lot of experience in the aesthetic and functional aspects of human nasal anatomy. His international patient base spans over 40 countries. Also, he is a distinguished member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the Turkish Society of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (TPCD).
But he is not only an expert in the operating room. His work is published in academic publications pretty frequently, and he also hosts lectures. All this proves his professional authority in plastic surgery.
His clinic is Cosmedica Aesthetic, where he uses Piezo ultrasonic rhinoplasty, which is a cutting edge surgical technique that uses ultrasonic energy to reshape bone and cartilage. This lends to great precision, and the result is great for the patient: less tissue trauma and a faster recovery.
His clinic uses 3D imaging for pre operative planning so that the results align with the patient’s unique facial features.
Cosmedica Aesthetic offers comprehensive care, all inclusive packages that cover hospital stays, luxury hotel accommodations, airport transfers, 24/7 patient support, and post operative care.
It doesn’t matter if you need a primary procedure, or if you are searching for “revision rhinoplasty Turkey,” or “nose tip correction Turkey.” He’ll be there for you.
All this makes him a top choice in 2026 (and beyond) for facial harmony.
#2 Dr. Suleyman Tas (Istanbul)
He is a specialist in closed atraumatic rhinoplasty with over 15 years of experience, and recognized for his international fellowship training and contributions to European aesthetic societies.
#3 Dr. Muhammet Dilber (Istanbul)
This doctor focuses on advanced rhinoplasty procedures, and he has a solid reputation for natural looking results and long term structural stability.
#4 Dr. Hasan Duygulu (Istanbul)
This man specializes in facial plastic surgery with a heavy focus on complex nasal surgeries, and he is known for a detailed approach to tip refinement and ethnic rhinoplasty.
#5 Dr. Ozan Balık (Istanbul)
This doctor is certified by the National Board of Medical Examiners. He can do Reverse-B rhinoplasty techniques and uses digital simulation tools.
#6 Dr. Yunus Kaplan (Istanbul)
He is an expert in high volume nasal reconstruction and aesthetic surgery, and the medical community says good things about his precision in treating dorsal humps and septal deviations.
#7 Dr. Seçkin Ulusoy (Istanbul)
He is an expert in ENT and facial plastic surgery, focusing on a clear balance between breathing function and facial aesthetics.
#8 Dr. Murat Songu (Izmir)
He is a leading academic and surgeon specializing in revision surgery and pediatric nasal cases. He is a recipient of numerous national surgical awards.
#9 Dr. Mehmet Emre Dinç (Istanbul)
This man is an Associate Professor who graduated from Istanbul University. His focus is on Piezo technology and structural rhinoplasty.
#10 Dr. Bora Ok (Istanbul)
This doctor specializes in ethnic rhinoplasty and gender affirming rhinoplasty with a focus on keeping the patient’s unique facial features.
Types of Rhinoplasty Procedures in Turkey
Here’s a brief overview of the different types of procedures to help you pick one that’s right for you.
- Primary rhinoplasty is the initial surgery to reshape the nose for aesthetic or functional goals;
- Revision rhinoplasty is a corrective surgery for patients who have had unsatisfactory results from a previous procedure;
- Ultrasonic/Piezo rhinoplasty uses ultrasonic energy to reshape the bone and cartilage, resulting in less bruising and faster healing;
- Ethnic rhinoplasty is an approach that enhances the nose while carefully preserving the patient’s ethnic facial features and nasal anatomy;
- Functional rhinoplasty includes septoplasty to correct breathing issues and appearance;
- Nose reconstruction is one of the more advanced techniques for complex cases involving significant structural rebuilding of the nasal structure.
Rhinoplasty Cost in Turkey (Updated 2026)
The average cost of an all inclusive package in Turkey typically is between €2,500 and €5,000. The price ultimately depends on several factors, like:
- Years of experience;
- The clinic’s international accreditation levels;
- The complexity of the case (specifically whether it is a primary or revision surgery);
- The techniques used.
Here’s a quick price comparison table.
| Country | Procedure Type | Avg. Price Range (Approx.) |
| Turkey | Primary / Revision | €2,500 – €5,000 |
| UK | Primary / Revision | €7,000 – €12,000 |
| USA | Primary / Revision | €8,000 – €15,000 |
Top clinics provide all inclusive packages to simplify the experience for international guests. These generally include pre operative tests, the surgery and anesthesia, a hospital stay of 3 to 4 nights, luxury hotel accommodation, airport transfers, necessary medication, and 24/7 patient support.
What Results You Can Expect
Here’s what a typical healing timeline looks like:
- During the first 7 days, you can expect swelling and bruising, and the nasal splint will be in place during this week;
- Weeks 2 or 4 is when most visible bruising starts disappear, and you can return to your social life;
- After 3 to 6 months, the residual swelling will continue to subside, and the refined shape of the nose will become clear;
- After about 12 months, the final result will be fully visible.
Now, you need to understand that there is a difference between natural and dramatic results. It all depends on your facial harmony and your unique facial features. It also depends on the type of procedure (whether you went for tip refinement, bridge shaping, or nostril adjustment).
Also, it’s important that you understand the potential risks of plastic surgery. Temporary swelling and breathing changes are common during healing. There are also some rare risks like asymmetry or the need for revision surgery, but if you choose a qualified surgeon who provides a regular check and post operative care, you don’t have to worry about that.
How to Choose the Right Rhinoplasty Surgeon in Turkey
Here’s a practical checklist to help you pick the right rhinoplasty surgeon:
- Board certification in plastic and reconstructive surgery;
- Portfolio consistency with a quality before and after gallery with different nose types;
- Years of experience with your specific nasal anatomy and procedure type;
- Verified reviews on independent platforms;
- Clinic accreditations like JCI or Ministry of Health authorization;
- 3D imaging and digital simulation for planning;
- Transparent post operative care plan and clear communication.
Conclusion
So, as we learned, Turkey is a leading destination for rhinoplasty and facial aesthetics in 2026, and picking the right rhinoplasty surgeon depends on their credentials, techniques, safety protocols, and aftercare. Cosmedica Aesthetic and Dr. Ufuk Durgun stand out as a natural first choice for patients seeking care in 2026, with elite credentials and an all inclusive approach that prioritizes safety.
Explore your options and book a free consultation with your chosen surgeon.
Politics
New York Mayor Mamdani successfully recovered $9m in unpaid fines from Amazon
New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, alongside the City’s Commissioners in the Department of Finance (DOF) and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), has announced that his administration has managed to recover over $9m in previously unpaid fines.
These fines came from idling violations committed by Bezos’ delivery vehicles and third-party contractors, and despite the Amazon’s $2 trillion valuation, the company has ignored them – until now.
This serves as a timely reminder that authorities can hold dominant corporations accountable and make them pay up accordingly when political will exists.
Amazon is worth $2 trillion. But it didn't deign to pay the millions of dollars it racked up in unpaid fines as its’ trucks illegally polluted our air and forced New Yorkers to breathe in their exhaust. — Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@NYCMayor) May 22, 2026
⁰We collected every dollar they owe the people of this city — and will… pic.twitter.com/LzlPXP7hR3
Mamdani: “No company – no matter how large or powerful – is above the law”
This huge sum recovered from billionaire Jeff Bezos’ Amazon was due as a result of New York City’s anti-idling laws, which were introduced to tackle air pollution. These laws subsequently made it illegal for most vehicles to keep the engine running whilst idle for more than three minutes. In turn, this would then improve public health and also work to improve action against climate change.
Speaking about the lack of accountability amongst billionaires compared to ordinary, hard-working people, Mamdani said:
Amazon is worth $2 trillion. Yet, it did not deign to pay the millions of dollars it racked up in unpaid fines as its trucks illegally polluted our air and forced New Yorkers to breathe in their exhaust. We are going to collect every dollar they owe the people of this city.
These laws exist for a reason: cleaner air, healthier communities, and a city where corporations are held to the same standard as everyone else.
Today we are making clear that no company – no matter how large or powerful – is above the law.
Richard Lee, Commissioner for the DOF, showed his support for holding companies accountable, saying:
As part of the Mayor’s directive to ensure fairness, collaboration, and accountability in our agency’s service to New Yorkers, the Department of Finance is committed to collecting debts owed to the city and supporting enforcement efforts that protect New Yorkers’ quality of life.
The successful collection effort led by DOF Deputy Commissioner Annette Hill and her team, demonstrates the effectiveness of this administration working collaboratively with companies to ensure compliance, holding entities accountable for meeting their financial obligations to the City, and assisting companies like Amazon to prevent accumulating debt.
Similarly, Lisa Garcia – Commissioner for the DEP – applauded the Mamdani administration’s successful efforts to confront one of the “worst idling offenders in the city”, stating:
I applaud Mayor Mamdani and the Department of Finance for securing more than $9 million in illegal idling fines from Amazon, which has long been among the top worst idling offenders in the city.
Through the Citizens Air Complaint Program, New Yorkers can report idling with a video upload – helping us cut air pollution and improve quality of life.
Adding a particular poignancy to this news is the fact that it followed Jeff Bezos’ public criticisms of Mamdani’s moves to tax wealth to better fund education.
Contrary to establishment politicians who bend to big money and corporations, Mamdani did not back down and made it clear that society should hold everyone to the same standards, rather than continually burdening the 99% while letting the super-rich escape accountability.
New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani has collected $9m (£6.6m) in unpaid fines from Amazon, which has been violating the city's clean air laws by leaving engines running on its parked vehicles.
His office announced the recovery of the money last week, days after Amazon CEO Jeff… pic.twitter.com/BGoJb5eHft
— It's politics (@uspolitics1111) May 25, 2026
Citizen-led justice
New Yorkers can make anonymous reports about idling vehicles by calling 311, filing an online complaint, or participating in the NYC Department of Environmental Protection’s Citizens Air Complaint Program.
As a result, this gives ordinary citizens a powerful tool to take action in their local communities and helps ensure they apply accountability without fear or favour, with citizen-led justice as an underlying principle.
Needless to say, this issue is likely also a problem in the UK, where Amazon operates heavily. It will be interesting to see whether UK leaders consider introducing a similar policy. However, that would require them to be willing to make sure that extreme wealth does not shield powerful actors from accountability while they accumulate more wealth at the expense of our society and the environment.
Nevertheless, we won’t be holding our breath.
Featured image via Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
-
Crypto World5 days agoBlockchain.com files with SEC for U.S. IPO
-
Fashion4 days agoHoliday Weekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Business4 days agoDell Technologies DELL Stock Surges 15% on AI Server Momentum and Analyst Upgrades in 2026
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitcoin Accumulation Weakens as BTC Realized Losses Hit $600M
-
Crypto World4 days agoSpace X IPO Is ‘Bad News’ for Tech Stocks: But What About Bitcoin?
-
Crypto World3 days agoRobinhood crypto COO Tanya Denisova exits
-
Politics4 days agoMakerfield: a tale of two social-media histories
-
Business2 days agoNYT Strands Answers May 24 2026 Revealed for Puzzle No. 812 Theme Summer Essentials
-
Crypto World5 days agoMicroStrategy’s Saylor Says Miners No Longer Set Bitcoin Price, Another Force Has Taken Over
-
Tech5 days agoWhatsApp ads could make Irish debut after discussions with DPC
-
Crypto World4 days agoAI infrastructure race heats up as IREN pitches full-stack strategy, WhiteFiber lands $160M deal
-
Tech4 days agoA 0.12% parameter add-on gives AI agents the working memory RAG can’t
-
Tech5 days agoYou Can Now Add ChatGPT To PowerPoint
-
NewsBeat5 days agoCharity run by Reform leader Malcolm Offord accused of ‘law breaking’ over Scottish registration
-
Business4 days agoTrump Invests $1M-$5M in Kura Sushi USA Chain With 27 California Locations
-
Tech1 day agoMicrosoft’s quiet Claude Code retreat and the real cost of enterprise AI
-
Sports5 days ago2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson leaderboard: Brooks Koepka finds putting stroke in Round 1
-
Crypto World6 days agoExa Labs raises $250 million in funding led by a16z
-
Business4 days ago
Goldman Sachs reinstates Ageas stock coverage with neutral rating
-
Crypto World4 days agoVerus Bridge Hacker Returns $8.5M ETH, Keeps $2.8M as Bounty








You must be logged in to post a comment Login