Canadian crypto participation is rising quickly, according to fresh research from the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). The regulator’s latest survey suggests that the share of Canadians who own cryptocurrencies has climbed to 25% in 2026, up from 10% in 2023—an expansion that also coincides with broader awareness of crypto assets.

The OSC released the findings Tuesday, based on a poll of 2,360 Canadians aged 18 and over conducted between December 2025 and January 2026. The study found that 59% of respondents said they are aware of crypto assets, while 25% reported that they currently hold cryptocurrencies.

Key takeaways

• The OSC survey reports crypto ownership has reached 25% in 2026, compared with 10% in 2023.
• Awareness increased alongside ownership, with 59% of respondents indicating they know about crypto assets.
• About half of crypto owners said they check whether a platform is registered before using it.
• Despite growing caution, the OSC found widespread confusion about regulation, insurance protections, and transaction capabilities.

Ownership and awareness move upward

The OSC’s survey points to a clear jump in both familiarity and direct engagement with crypto. In 2026, a majority of respondents—59%—reported awareness of crypto assets, while one-quarter said they hold cryptocurrencies.

That shift matters for regulators because it implies crypto is moving from a niche activity toward mainstream consumer behavior. As more Canadians participate, investor protection issues typically become more urgent, particularly around how users choose platforms, understand risk, and interpret what protections (if any) apply when assets are held or transacted through a service.

OSC executive vice president of strategic regulation Naizam Kanji said the regulator expects “emerging trends and behaviors” to help it anticipate opportunities and risks, with the goal of supporting investor protection while fostering fair and efficient markets.

Checking registrations—alongside continuing misunderstandings

One of the more actionable details in the OSC findings is how some users evaluate platforms. The survey indicates that about 50% of crypto owners reported checking whether a platform is registered prior to using it.

However, the report also suggests that heightened awareness does not necessarily translate into a correct understanding of the rules that govern crypto activity in Canada. The OSC said many respondents still had “some misunderstanding” around key issues—namely regulation, insurance protections, and transaction capabilities.

For investors, this mix of behavior is significant. Register checks can be a useful step, but misunderstanding the practical meaning of registration—or assuming protections exist where they do not—can expose users to avoidable losses. The OSC’s results imply that more effective education and clearer disclosures may be needed, even as adoption rises.

How Ottawa’s crypto proposals fit the trend

The OSC’s survey lands amid ongoing policy debate in Canada about the appropriate ways to regulate different crypto-related activities. According to the report, lawmakers in Ottawa have been considering measures tailored to how cryptocurrencies are used in practice.

Earlier this year, the federal government advanced a bill that could prohibit political donations made using crypto. The government also proposed banning crypto ATMs, citing concerns about scams and money laundering. Taken together, these proposals highlight a broad regulatory theme: as crypto use grows, authorities are focusing not just on trading and custody, but also on high-risk channels that can enable fraud.

While the OSC survey focuses on awareness, ownership, and user understanding, Ottawa’s legislative direction underscores a parallel concern among policymakers—reducing harm where crypto intersects with consumers and enforcement challenges.

What to watch next for Canadian investors

The OSC’s data suggests that Canada’s crypto base is expanding while gaps in consumer understanding remain. The most important question for users and market participants is whether regulators will translate these survey insights into clearer requirements, better consumer education, and more targeted enforcement—especially in areas where misunderstanding could lead to financial harm.

As the next rounds of research and policy developments emerge, Canadians should pay close attention to how platform registration is communicated in practice, what protections users can realistically expect, and which services regulators move to restrict or supervise more tightly.

As Hyperliquid and Cardano face market uncertainty, BlockDAG is expanding its ecosystem with upcoming claims and staking functionality for users.

The Hyperliquid price hovers near a critical make-or-break zone as trading interest cools down. Meanwhile, the Cardano price is facing pressure after reaching very low RSI levels, with traders watching for signs of a possible recovery.

Standing far above these uncertain charts, BlockDAG (BDAG) is introducing a new stage of ecosystem development with upcoming claims and staking features. Claims for Batches 1–6 and staking are scheduled to go live within hours, adding new utility for the growing network.

Alongside these updates, BDAG is available at a limited-time price of $0.00000019, while Live Swap remains active at 22% below the CoinMarketCap price. With continued progress across the Casino & Sportsbook, BlockDAG Exchange, Super App, and upcoming Tier 1 exchange listings, BlockDAG is building momentum around broader ecosystem growth and long-term blockchain adoption.

Hyperliquid price faces downward pressure

The Hyperliquid price sits near $60 as buying interest slows down. Right now, the token stays below its 50-day average price of $62.70, showing that momentum has cooled. 

Advertisement

Big investors seem to be stepping back, with specialized crypto funds pulling out nearly $700,000 in a single day. On top of that, a major token holder recently moved over 395,000 HYPE to an exchange, which often signals a plan to sell.

While trading volume jumped slightly, most traders remain divided on where the market goes next. If the price falls below its $60.41 support level, it could easily drop further toward $54.19, keeping near-term risks quite high for buyers.

Cardano price holds firm above historic lows

The Cardano price is holding around $0.16 after dipping almost 2% recently. The coin sits in a support range between $0.14 and $0.17, which has helped stop deeper drops in the past. 

Indicators show the market is heavily oversold, meaning selling has been intense for a long time. Some chart readers see a potential bottom pattern forming, but nothing is confirmed yet. For a real comeback, the token needs to climb past the $0.23 resistance level. 

Advertisement

However, actual buying demand remains weak across weekly charts. If support at $0.14 fails to hold, the price risks sliding down toward $0.10, leaving the token in a shaky position for now.

BlockDAG prepares staking and claim launch

Timing can make the biggest difference when entering a high-growth opportunity, and BlockDAG is giving participants a chance to move before the crowd. BlockDAG is creating renewed attention. 

BlockDAG is currently available at $0.00000019, while the Live Swap remains active at 22% below the CoinMarketCap price, giving market participants a limited timeframe to explore the latest opportunity.

The next few hours mark the launch of claims for Batches 1–6 and staking, bringing new functionality to the network. As activity builds around these updates, BlockDAG continues advancing its wider ecosystem with the Casino & Sportsbook, BlockDAG Exchange, Super App, and upcoming Tier 1 exchange listings. These developments are placing increased focus on BDAG as the project moves toward its next stage of growth.

Community growth tells the story: more than 312,000 holders, increasing by over 1,000 each day, alongside 4 million+ users on the X1 mining app and 20,000 physical miners already shipping globally. 

From a technology perspective, the latest RPC upgrade processed 100,000 transactions within 24 hours, highlighting the network’s scalability. Combined with early-entry projections suggesting the potential for up to 5,000x ROI, it’s clear why many investors are viewing BDAG as one of the top crypto opportunities today.

For more information, visit the official website, presale, Telegram, and Discord.

Cointelegraph is committed to providing independent, high-quality journalism across the crypto, blockchain, AI, and fintech industries.

All news, reviews, and analyses are produced with full journalistic independence and integrity. For more details on our standards and processes, please read our Editorial Policy.

Some of the world’s biggest banks have completed real cross-border payments using tokenized money in a test led by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), another sign that tokenization is moving into the plumbing of global finance.

Project Agorá, which brings together five central banks and 28 commercial lenders including JPMorgan, Citi, UBS, Deutsche Bank and Standard Chartered, processed roughly $1 million (CHF 800,000) in real-value transactions across six currencies — the U.S. dollar, euro, British pound, Japanese yen, Swiss franc and South Korean won.

The pilot used tokenized central bank reserves and commercial bank deposits to settle corporate, interbank payments perand foreign exchange settlements. The payments settled in an average of about 80 seconds, even though the prototype was not directly integrated with banks’ existing payment infrastructure, the BIS report said.

The project fits into a broader shift as stablecoins and tokenized assets gain traction across global finance. Asset managers have begun issuing tokenized money market and private credit funds, while stablecoins are increasingly being used for cross-border payments and corporate treasury operations.

A new model for cross-border payments

Project Agorá explores whether the same technology can modernize the infrastructure banks use to move money internationally.

A major U.S. police organization has endorsed the latest CLARITY Act draft, but unresolved disputes over political ethics, DeFi protections and stablecoin rewards continue to threaten its passage before the Senate recess.

Major Cities Chiefs Association backs CLARITY Act

The Major Cities Chiefs Association endorsed the latest version of the CLARITY Act in a letter to Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott and ranking member Elizabeth Warren.

MCCA said recent revisions addressed concerns previously raised by police and prosecutors. The organization specifically pointed to additional law-enforcement provisions and the inclusion of state and local agencies in Sections 10203, 10204 and 10309.

“The inclusion of these provisions represents a meaningful step toward improving the ability of law enforcement to investigate financial crimes involving digital assets,” the association wrote.

MCCA joins several other police organizations that have moved toward supporting the proposed U.S. crypto market structure framework.

The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives became the first major police association to endorse the bill. The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association later offered conditional support while requesting stronger rules governing accountability in decentralized finance.

The National Fraternal Order of Police, which represents more than 382,000 officers, also reversed its previous opposition after reviewing revisions to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provisions.

Major County Sheriffs of America has stopped short of endorsing the legislation but withdrew its formal opposition. The group adopted a neutral position while asking Congress to give state and local agencies a role in Treasury studies and advisory panels created under the bill.

Why police groups previously opposed the crypto bill

Earlier law-enforcement resistance focused primarily on the CLARITY Act’s treatment of non-custodial crypto developers.

The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act language generally protects developers and infrastructure providers from being classified as money transmitters when they do not control customer funds. Supporters say those protections prevent programmers from being prosecuted solely because criminals use open-source software.

Police groups and prosecutors argued that earlier wording was too broad. They warned that DeFi operators, mixers and other services could use the exemption to avoid registration and accountability, making it harder to trace illicit funds or recover assets for victims.

Revisions clarified that developers may still face prosecution when they knowingly or intentionally facilitate money laundering and other crimes. The updated draft also preserves existing criminal-enforcement powers and gives state and local agencies a larger role.

However, Democrats led by Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and several prosecutors continue to seek additional changes. Their proposal would narrow or remove protections that could shield some crypto service providers from prosecution.

Banks push for tighter stablecoin restrictions

The banking industry supports the broader goal of establishing federal rules for digital assets but wants lawmakers to revise the bill’s stablecoin provisions.

A coalition of 134 banking association officials and senior bank executives has asked the Senate to strengthen Section 10404. That provision restricts stablecoin issuers from paying interest but allows certain rewards tied to payments, memberships and other activities.

Banks argue that exchanges could use those exceptions to provide returns resembling interest on stablecoin balances. They warn that such products could pull deposits away from regulated banks and reduce funding available for mortgages, agricultural credit and small-business loans.

The American Bankers Association and five other financial trade groups have called the legislation an important step toward federal crypto regulation. However, they want Congress to prohibit passive returns tied to the size or duration of stablecoin holdings while preserving legitimate transaction-based rewards.

White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt has disputed the banking industry’s warnings, arguing that banks are seeking protection from competition rather than stronger consumer safeguards.

Ethics dispute leaves passage odds at 30%

Despite growing police support, political ethics remains one of the largest barriers to a Senate agreement.

Democrats want restrictions addressing financial interests in crypto held by elected officials and their families. Republican Senator Thom Tillis has also indicated that he will not support the bill without an acceptable ethics provision.

Tillis reportedly plans to send a bipartisan ethics proposal to the White House for President Donald Trump’s approval. Democrats have not ruled out supporting a vote before the recess, but they are unlikely to back the current text without further changes.

Polymarket traders place the probability of Trump signing the CLARITY Act in 2026 at 30%. The Senate has until its scheduled Aug. 7 recess to reach an agreement and advance the legislation during the current window.

MCCA’s endorsement removes one source of institutional resistance, but it does not resolve the ethics, DeFi and stablecoin disputes. Without a bipartisan compromise, the bill may struggle to secure the 60 Senate votes needed to overcome a filibuster.

Apple faces bipartisan pressure to rule out memory chips from two Chinese suppliers as an AI-driven shortage tightens global supply and raises production costs.

Senators give Apple an Aug. 21 deadline

Six US senators have urged Apple CEO Tim Cook to abandon any plan to source memory chips from ChangXin Memory Technologies, or CXMT, and Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., commonly known as YMTC.

The bipartisan letter was led by Republican Senator Jim Banks of Indiana and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York. Senators Andy Kim, Jeanne Shaheen, Mike Crapo and Pete Ricketts also signed it.

Lawmakers asked Apple to confirm by Aug. 21 that it would not use components made by either supplier, including in devices produced exclusively for the Chinese market. Bloomberg first reported the letter.

“Once a part clears qualification for Apple production, extending it worldwide is a single procurement decision away,” the senators wrote.

The group also asked Apple whether it transferred intellectual property to CXMT or YMTC while evaluating their components. Such transfers could require approval from the US Commerce Department, depending on the technology involved.

Apple had not publicly responded to the letter at the time of writing.

Why US lawmakers oppose CXMT and YMTC

Washington’s concerns center on the suppliers’ alleged links to China’s government and defense industry.

The Pentagon added both companies to its updated Section 1260H list in June. The Defense Department document describes CXMT as affiliated with China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and state-owned asset authorities.

It identifies YMTC as indirectly owned or affiliated with Chinese government and defense agencies. Both companies have denied that they support China’s military.

A Section 1260H designation does not impose the same restrictions as a full trade sanction. However, it limits Pentagon dealings with listed companies and signals possible future procurement or investment restrictions.

YMTC also remains on the Commerce Department’s Entity List, restricting its access to certain US technology, software and chipmaking equipment. CXMT is not currently on that list, although there are reports that a US interagency committee previously approved it for inclusion.

Apple encountered similar opposition in 2022 when it considered using YMTC flash memory in some iPhones. The company dropped those plans after lawmakers raised national security concerns.

AI memory shortage limits Apple’s options

The dispute comes as AI data centers absorb a growing share of global memory production. Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron have directed more capacity toward high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators, reducing supplies available for smartphones, computers and other consumer products.

CXMT has become the world’s fourth-largest memory producer, while YMTC has expanded its position in NAND flash storage. The companies are gaining pricing power as buyers compete for limited supply, according to Reuters.

Apple has argued that it needs access to Chinese memory and has sought assurances that CXMT will not be added to the Entity List, Reuters reported, citing people familiar with the discussions.

Blocking both companies would leave Apple more dependent on Samsung, SK Hynix and US-based Micron. That could weaken Apple’s ability to negotiate prices while memory costs remain elevated.

For US investors, the immediate risk is margin pressure. Apple must either absorb higher component costs, pass them to customers through higher product prices, or redesign parts of its supply chain.

Apple stock falls as investors await its response

Apple shares closed at $338.19 on July 29, down 0.56%, after reaching an intraday high of $344.57. The reversal prevented the company from closing above a $5 trillion market value.

AAPL extended the decline during July 30 trading, falling about 1.8% in the morning as investors also prepared for Apple’s quarterly earnings report.

The Aug. 21 response will show whether Apple accepts the senators’ demand or continues evaluating Chinese memory for locally sold devices. Lawmakers also want to know whether Apple sought priority supply from US and South Korean manufacturers, making its answer relevant to the company’s sourcing plans for the 2027 iPhone cycle.

Separately, Apple faces a federal lawsuit from three users who allege that fake apps impersonating Sparrow Wallet appeared on its App Store and caused approximately $1.835 million in Bitcoin losses.