Fans attending the 2026 World Cup will not be allowed to bring reusable water bottles into stadiums. The latest restriction introduced by FIFA has sparked criticism and concerns about temperatures across the tournament’s hottest host cities. This year’s tournament features 48 teams for the first time. It will take place across the United States, Canada, and Mexico. As a result, several matches are expected to be played in high temperatures and humidity.

What has changed in stadium rules?

Under the new regulations, fans cannot bring reusable water bottles into venues. However, previously, spectators could carry transparent, empty plastic bottles up to one litre. The updated policy also bans cups, metal containers, and similar items.

FIFA says the move is part of a broader security framework. In a statement, the governing body explained that such objects could be used as projectiles, posing a danger to fans, players, and tournament staff. In a statement to Reuters, FIFA said it is committed to protecting:

the health and safety of all players, referees, fans, volunteers and staff.

FIFA also cited safety reasons, saying the ban is intended to reduce the risk of injury:

Outside bottles are already prohibited at several of these venues for safety considerations and FIFA is applying this ​consideration across its tournament stadiums.

Heat concerns at host cities

FIFA fans hit back

Fan groups have slammed FIFA’s policy, including England’s “Free Lions,” who called the water bottle ban a blatant money grab so close to kickoff.

The group said they had previously been assured reusable water bottles would be allowed, and questioned the sudden reversal.

What next? Suncream banned and fans forced to buy it in stadiums?

For all of the effort they are going to with ‘drinks breaks’ for the players, this is such a strange, late change.

In all of our discussions, free water availability in stadiums was a key one and we were assured… https://t.co/cXjwQwhRLO pic.twitter.com/0XhGsHHECS

— Free Lions (@WeAreFreeLions) June 4, 2026

Speaking to the Guardian, Ronan Evain, director of Football Supporters Europe, called FIFA’s water ban “a real health risk,” warning that harder access to hydration raises the chances of heatstroke and dehydration. He also slammed the governing body for putting profits ahead of fan safety, calling the decision “appalling” and saying it:

shows the priority seems to be, again, to generate revenues. How immoral it is to [profit from] water in this situation when people’s health is at risk.

Featured image via Dan Mullan / Getty Images

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Brighton-based Tony Greenstein is one of the best-known of the UK’s many Jewish anti-genocide activists. As a result, he is one of the most targeted by the Israel lobby’s attacks and smears – including by the UK government. And he has again been hit with one of the most insidious forms of financial attack: de-banking.

‘De-banking’ is a financial state and establishment terror weapon. It involves the summary closure of bank accounts, often under orders or pressure from government or influential groups. This is frequently used as a weapon to financially disable those who stand up for the Palestinian people against genocide, occupation and oppression.

Greenstein was first targeted in July 2025, when HSBC and one of its subsidiaries simultaneously decided to ‘review’ his account arrangements and unilaterally closed his accounts.

“Financial terrorism”

Now, both Greenstein personally and charities he helps run have been targeted simultaneously, by banking giant Santander. He told Skwawkbox:

Santander has just frozen my accounts and also that of the Brighton Trust and [of] Brighton Unemployed Workers Centre.

It is little short of outrageous and they haven’t even informed me what they are doing. It is financial terrorism

The bank provided no communication about its actions. Instead, Greenstein only found out the accounts had been frozen when he tried to access them. He does not know whether or how he or the charities will be able to access their funds.

Featured image via Getty/Leon Neal

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence. In Belfast, Home Office incompetence is threatening Nina Briggs, head of the Migrant Workers’ Union Northern Ireland, with deportation.

They insist that Briggs’ active appeal against the unfair Home Office decision does not exist. That is despite an immigration tribunal confirming the department submitted documents in her case in December 2025.

Briggs has spent the last 14 years living in Britain or the North of Ireland. Born in the US, she came to Britain to study at St Andrews University in Scotland back in 2012, at age 16. She subsequently entered into a relationship in which, she told the Canary, her partner subjected her to terrible domestic abuse. This resulted in physical injuries and severe post-traumatic stress disorder, which a GP and therapist said caused “permanent disability”.

Home Office ignores conclusive evidence of domestic abuse

The abuse resulted in Briggs returning to the US to seek treatment between 2018-2019. By the time she had fully recovered, COVID had hit. Travel restrictions during this period meant she was unable to head back to Britain or the north of Ireland. She eventually came to Belfast in 2021, under another student visa, this time for a PhD in intergroup contact and mending conflict at Queen’s University Belfast.

Ordinarily, anyone who stays legally in Britain and North of Ireland for 10 years continuously can be automatically granted Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). This gives the holder most of the rights of a British citizen, but without full citizenship. Briggs’ reasonable claim is that the period of her medical care in the US, along with the COVID timeframe, should count towards that 10 year period, on compassionate grounds.

Here’s where the malice part of the Home Office enters the picture. The department, tasked by successive sadists acting as home secretary, tries to find any way it can not to grant people the right to stay. In this case, they deemed Briggs’ evidence “not compelling”. She told the Canary:

This is despite having evidence about the domestic violence from a GP, therapist, witness statements, and testimony from a domestic violence shelter.

Briggs appealed, and the Home Office now claims, implausibly, that her case does not exist. She has now been left in what she refers to as “3C limbo”. This is in reference to Section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971. Its terms should extend the rights of her last visa while her appeal is underway. However, because the Home Office say that appeal doesn’t exist, they have not granted her those rights. She said:

It means I can’t get housing. I can’t get health care, or legal aid. Nor can I self-employ or fundraise. I’m also facing a no-fault eviction, and Right to Rent checks prevent me from securing new accommodation.

Racist department prevent woman from attending family funerals

It’s a reminder of the cruelty inherent to Britain’s immigration system. That has been compounded by the rules preventing Briggs from leaving the country while stuck in this situation. If she did, the Home Office would rule that she had abandoned her case. This would effectively be an admission of guilt for the ‘crime’ of overstaying a visa. Such a finding would permanently affect her ability to travel.

During this period — which extends back to October 2024 — she has been unable to attend funerals for her grandmother, a cousin, an uncle, and several friends. Both her mother and stepmother have cancer.

Briggs has further grounds to request the right to stay. Despite being an accomplished data scientist who would be an asset to society here, the Home Office rejected her application for a skilled worker visa. She is bolstering her separate ILR application with evidence of her human rights work. This includes extensive efforts to combat human trafficking and modern slavery, areas the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) tends to fall short on.

‘High number of poor quality refusals’

As part of the efforts against modern slavery, Briggs has helped on investigations into children being dragged into criminality via racist pogroms led by loyalist paramilitaries. She told the Canary:

Unionist community leaders and politicians I’ve spoken to have been sympathetic to that work. It’s their community – they don’t want a whole generation of boys with their lives ruined due to getting a criminal record so early.

News of Home Office ineptitude won’t surprise anyone who follows the department closely. Free Movement have highlighted the “high number of poor quality refusals” as one of the “stand out problems of the asylum system”. The National Audit Office slated the Home Office for not having:

…a full understanding of how the Skilled Worker visa route is operating.

The department fails to trains its staff properly, and doesn’t have enough of them, resulting in huge backlogs on applications.

As a result of all this, combined with a dose of malice injected by the right, we risk losing the expertise and compassion of people like Nina Briggs.

Featured image via author

By Robert Freeman

Source link

Most football matches are decided by small margins, but others are not. In fact, matches in the World Cup often feature remarkable scorelines not seen elsewhere. In such games, defensive structure can collapse, and goals accumulate quickly. Sometimes this happens through clear mismatches. At other times, it results from unusually open play. With the 2026 edition approaching in the United States, Canada and Mexico, a record 48 teams are taking part. This raises the bar. Uneven scorelines are all the more likely to appear, particularly when debut nations come up against established football powers.

Below are the highest-scoring matches in World Cup history, based on official FIFA records.

Nine-goal matches

Argentina 6–3 Mexico (1930) — This inaugural match showcased the drama that only the World Cup can deliver. Argentina defeated Mexico in a nine-goal contest.

Hungary 9–0 South Korea (1954) — Hungary produced one of the most one-sided wins in tournament history. They scored nine without reply.

West Germany 7–2 Türkiye (1954) — West Germany advanced comfortably with a seven-goal performance, during the play-off round.

France 6–3 West Germany (1958) — France finished third after a high-scoring match against West Germany.

Yugoslavia 9–0 Zaire (1974) — Yugoslavia recorded a nine-goal victory in the group stage. This stands as the most decisive result in any World Cup to date.

Ten-goal match

France 7–3 Paraguay (1958) — A ten-goal match played out during a tournament defined by Just Fontaine’s scoring record. Consequently, this World Cup fixture remains legendary.

Eleven-goal matches

Brazil 6–5 Poland (1938) — An open match ended narrowly in Brazil’s favour after a high-scoring contest typical of classic World Cup encounters.

Hungary 8–3 West Germany (1954) — Hungary’s attack overwhelmed West Germany in a group-stage meeting.

Hungary 10–1 El Salvador (1982) — Hungary recorded the largest winning margin in World Cup history. 

Twelve-goal record

Austria 7–5 Switzerland (1954) — The highest-scoring match in World Cup history remains the 1954 quarter-final known as the “Battle of Lausanne,” which produced 12 goals. World cup historians often cite this match for its non-stop action and drama. Austria came from behind in a match defined by constant swings in momentum.

Despite the expanded 2026 format, no match has yet rivalled Lausanne’s 12-goal record — 2026 will tell.

Featured image via Richard Heathcote / Getty Images

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

3 min read43 min

Andy Burnham has said he would take a “much more devolved” approach to getting people into work and bringing down welfare spending.

Advertisement

Speaking to PoliticsHome in Makerfield on Friday, where he is standing as Labour’s by-election candidate later this month, the Greater Manchester mayor said: “We’ve all got to be concerned with getting the welfare bill down.

“I don’t think there’s any debate about that, to be honest, it’s how you do it.”

He argued that the best way to do so was through a more localised approach, rather than cuts made in Westminster.

“It’s an overhaul that the Whitehall system can’t really make,” he said. “It’s an argument actually for dealing with this in a much more devolved way than it is currently done.”

Advertisement

Burnham – who confirmed in a BBC debate on Thursday that he wants to replace Prime Minister Keir Starmer in No 10 if his bid to return to the House of Commons is successful – told PoliticsHome that local and regional authorities should be empowered to give out-of-work people the support they need for mental health problems.

“We don’t have a system that is set up to look and really get to the heart of why somebody isn’t able to sustain themselves in the labour market, and that’s been the journey that I’ve been on as mayor of Greater Manchester.

“But if you do give people what they’re looking for, I think you can support more people into work,” he said.

Advertisement

Welfare has emerged as a thorny issue for the Labour government since being elected in July 2024.

Starmer tried to introduce benefits reforms last year but was forced to abandon the plans by a major Labour backbench rebellion.

Private messages published by the government earlier this week showed Work and Pensions Secretary complaining to former US ambassador Peter Mandelson that “every meeting” he had with Labour MPs was a discussion about “who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others”.

A new report authored by former health secretary Alan Milburn found that the total annual cost to the taxpayer of just under one million young people not being in employment, education or training (NEET) is £125bn per year.

Advertisement

Speaking to PoliticsHome, Burnham described the report as a “very significant intervention”.

“I’ve contributed to it, and I think Alan is interested in what we’ve done because we’ve taken a different approach to supporting people into work.

“And this is the thing: The DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) system, I don’t think does do that, because it’s a very narrow approach in this day and age.”

He continued: “The reasons why people, particularly young people, may not be in work would be related to mental health or the housing situation or the debt they may be facing, a whole range of other things that are going on.”

Advertisement

Burnham criticised previous governments for encouraging more than 50 per cent of people to go to university.

“The obsession with the university route began with the Blair government, but then was very much continued by Gove in his reforms, [and] left 50 per cent or more of young people, particularly in an area like this [thinking], well, what about me?

In an interview with The House magazine in Makerfield, Burnham said he is “not going to hold back” on early reform to the House of Lords if he becomes prime minister.

“I can’t justify, personally, 800-plus members of the House of Lords. I don’t think – with great respect to many people in it, because I have true great respect, because there’s some incredible people in there – what the country spends on the House of Lords is actually justified by what the output is,” he said.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Source link

Obituaries for Franco-Iranian artist and author of Persepolis Marjane Satrapi are pouring in from Western politicians and media following news of her death in Paris at age 56 on Thursday.

Western establishments’ obituaries revealed a pattern of appreciating Satrapi for opposing Iran’s government, reflecting their ever-present instinct of Islamophobia.

“Persepolis” was a bestselling graphic novel series by Satrapi.

Most of them admire her as CNN puts it as:

an outspoken critic of Iran’s ruling establishment and a prominent supporter of the ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ movement.

Satrapi was married to Mattias Ripa, who helped translate ‘Persepolis’ into English. He died last year.

Persepolis author mourned

Associated Press reported that President Emmanuel Macron and his wife paid “tribute to a remarkable artist who transformed an Iranian childhood into a universal fable.”

Yael Braun-Pivet, President of the French National Assembly, posted a picture with Satrapi, captioning it that France had lost “an immense artist.”

Marjane Satrapi avait fait de son œuvre un acte de liberté.

Avec Persepolis, elle avait donné un visage et une voix à la révolution iranienne, portant haut le combat pour la liberté et la dignité des femmes. La France perd une artiste immense.

À sa famille, à ses proches,… pic.twitter.com/TCnaIOnxfs

— Yaël Braun-Pivet (@YaelBRAUNPIVET) June 4, 2026

Advertisement

French  politician Olivier Faure said the artist had given a “global echo” to the “victims of the mullahs.”

Marjane Satrapi, autrice de « Persepolis » est morte de tristesse. Elle laisse tous ceux qui l’ont aimée et admiré son œuvre, orphelins. Spiegelmann avec « Maus » avait su donner à son histoire traumatique familiale liée à la Shoah un écho mondial, Marjane Satrapi avait réussi la… pic.twitter.com/zEzK6ZA6LE

— Olivier Faure (@faureolivier) June 4, 2026

The Mayor of Cannes, David Lisnard, said  Satrapi lived through “repression and deprivation of freedom under the mullahs’ regime,” applauding her for defending women’s rights where they are “most endangered in the world.”

Elle était une grande artiste. Sa bande-dessinée puis son film autobiographique, Persepolis, distingué du Prix du jury au Festival de Cannes en 2007, étaient aussi beaux et raffinés, à l’instar de la grande culture perse, que ludiques et bouleversants sur les conséquences de la… pic.twitter.com/z7tUj9MCgM

— David Lisnard (@davidlisnard) June 4, 2026

Advertisement

Western media

France’s Le Monde ran a few articles. They said:

Satrapi, an outspoken critic of Iran’s theocratic government, arrived in France in 1994 and gained French nationality in 2006. Persepolis recounts the story of Satrapi’s early life in Tehran, struggling under the restrictions imposed by Iran’s Islamic leadership after the 1979 revolution, before she is sent to Europe by her parents and begins a life in exile.

They also call her “a powerful and outspoken artist,” in another article, and “a brilliant, free and creative artist,” in a third article.

Germany’s Die Zeit said her comics were a means of political enlightenment.

The Washington Post, Times of Israel, and  Haaretz posted the Associated Press story on Satrapi, which called her “a prominent advocate for women’s rights.”

Satrapi had worked with Israel’s film industry in the past. She was reported “enamored” with Israeli directors like Ari Folman and “friendly” with Eran Kolirin, according to Israel’s Haaretz.

The Financial Times quoted a letter that Satarpi had written she in which she said she wanted to show Western readers that Iran was not just a “country of fanatics and terrorists.”

The New York Times said her novel “illuminated the struggles of Iranians” during the Islamic Revolution

Breaking News: Marjane Satrapi, the Iranian-French author whose graphic novel series “Persepolis” illuminated the struggles of Iranians during the Islamic Revolution, died at 56. https://t.co/WQWxavBm5l

— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 4, 2026

Advertisement

In the end, the Western establishment’s embrace of Satrapi reveals more about them than her. These establishments love to canonise dissenters who serve their geopolitical narrative. Whilst many will mourn her art, it is no accident that the Western world chose to elevate her work.

Featured image via Getty/Gareth Cattermole

By The Canary

Source link

Source link

Source link

Michelle O’Neill doesn’t mince words: the first nationalist First Minister for the North of Ireland’s six counties sat down with Scottish paper the National. She had plenty to say about culture, reunification, Scottish independence, and the arrogance of Westminster.

Politics trickles through culture

Something huge is shifting in the North of Ireland.

You can feel it in the music, with establishment-baiting Belfast hip-hop trio Kneecap packing out venues across the world. You can see it on TV as Derry Girls made the six counties a cultural export. And you can measure it in the polling: 63% of people in the North now want a united Ireland inside the European Union.

Michelle O’Neill is not surprised. “Young people have it in spades,” she says of the new cultural confidence coursing through a nationalist Ireland.

That generation have a real, confident view of who they are, confident in their Irishness, very happy to assert it. They will not accept second-class citizenship.

Their parents endured it. Their grandparents endured it. This generation doesn’t plan on more of the same.

Unionists are losing the culture war

The confidence is undoubtedly real. But so is a hard, enduring, sometimes dangerous resistance to it.

O’Neill is unsparing about the forces lining up to suppress it. Political unionism, for example, she says:

blocked the Irish language at every turn.

The North still has no Irish language strategy. They fought for years just to get an Irish Language Act.

For those in political unionism trying to block that, they’re saying to young Irish Gaeilgeoirs [Gaeilge speakers] that you don’t have a place here.

What message does that send in 2026? It’s one of disrespect and intolerance and arrogance.

Young people, she says, have no truck with it. If Kneecap have done anything — they’ve certainly rocked the boat politically — it’s make Gaeilge very cool. And the new vibrancy on the streets is the proof.

British government fails yet another Palestine prosecution as Kneecap man goes free

Give us our Referendum

The cultural moment and the political moment are inseparable. When 63% of people in the North want reunification, the Good Friday Agreement’s constitutional logic demands a response.

Under its terms, the Northern Ireland Secretary holds the power to call a border poll when they believe a majority favours it. But Hilary Benn has refused. O’Neill is direct about what that refusal means.

Give us a referendum. If they’re so strong in the strength of the Union, what have they got to fear? Live up to the commitment.

She frames it, correctly, as a democratic right — one explicitly enshrined in the Agreement that ended thirty years of bloody conflict. Westminster signed that Agreement and should honour it.

An Ireland within Europe — that is the big prize.

(This is a sentiment certainly shared with the majority of SNP politicians and voters. Some 62% of Scots voted to remain in the EU, and that figure has likely only risen since. Brexit is still felt sorely in Scotland.)

But O’Neill knows the prosaic questions matter too. Taxes. pensions, healthcare, etc. She doesn’t want to simply dodge them. She flips them and, yes, perhaps weaponises them. But why shouldn’t she?

She’s right to point out, for example, that the six counties don’t have devolved fiscal powers of anything like the scope that Scotland has, which is still far below the scope of Westminster. (Although this scope is also limited by Rachel Reeves’ rigid OBR fiscal rules.)

Reunification, O’Neill argues, is an opportunity: a stronger economy, free education across the island, a roof over everyone’s head. The research backs her up too, where people in the Republic already earn more, have higher living standards, and face shorter healthcare waiting lists. (Not that the south is without problems, however — particularly Dublin’s notorious housing crisis.)

Untied Kingdom: anti-unionist parties take power across the Celtic nations

The new Celtic Alliance

O’Neill watched last week’s Scottish Parliament vote for an independence referendum with keen interest. She watched Westminster’s response with something closer to fury.

The very quick response from Whitehall was that they would completely disrespect and disregard that mandate. That’s a mandate from the people.

She sees Scotland, Wales, and the North of Ireland as part of the same story.

The recent elections in Scotland and Wales really add to that message. The people want self-determination, they want to take their future into their own hands.

The SNP and Plaid Cymru taking power in Edinburgh and Cardiff, in her words:

Demonstrates a real, seismic change in terms of our politics, collectively, here. …

The nations on the periphery of this broken union are moving. Westminster is not listening. That is no longer sustainable and it looks like major change is coming, sooner than later.

People are tired of the mess of Westminster. They’re tired of the disregard shown towards them. The austerity agenda, the revolving door of British prime ministers, Brexit — we have never been top of the agenda. We never will be. Our interests will never be served by Westminster.

That is not, despite SW1’s imagination, mere Celtic bitterness — it is serious political analysis. And it is shared, increasingly, from Belfast to Edinburgh to Cardiff.

O’Neill wants power-sharing in Stormont to work — she has even put her own party’s veto on the table to make institutions function. She can, she believes, make devolution work today while arguing unapologetically for constitutional change tomorrow.

But the direction of travel is clear. The nations are watching each other and drawing the same conclusions. Westminster’s continued disregard built this moment — it has no one else to blame.

Featured image via Getty/Charles McQuillan

By Cameron Baillie

Source link

In a new review, notorious pro-Israel agitator John Mann has pushed for measures to silence NHS humanitarianism. The government and NHS have already pledged to implement them, including a crackdown on NHS staff members openly expressing solidarity with Palestinian people during Israel’s ongoing genocide.

This is about Israel, not about ending racism

Israel is a key junior partner to US billionaire–imperialism. The UK is a junior partner too, so giving Israel political and material support is just part of the deal. And for British political elites trying to get away with this shameful behaviour, consistent and widespread public outrage over Israel’s genocide in Gaza has been a big problem.

This is why Keir Starmer’s regime has filled departments with pro-Israel lackeys, cracked down on citizens’ right to protest, and censored pro-Palestinian voices. So Mann’s review, calling for a ban on NHS staff wearing ‘political’ badges or wearing their uniforms at protests (with clear mentions of pro-Palestinian activism), is no surprise.

Meanwhile, years of UK governments backing genocide have helped to normalise far-right talking points. And in this context, racism against NHS workers has increased significantly – primarily targeting Black and Brown staff. There have even been examples of clear anti-Palestinian bias in the country’s main nursing union.

All forms of racism are vile. But Mann and other pro-Israel politicians have long prioritised and weaponised antisemitism allegations to try and smear or silence critics of Israel. The new review seems to be a continuation of that.

As we’ve reported previously, Mann is not Jewish himself. He’s just a person who has received tens of thousands of pounds from pro-Israel lobbyists and lobby groups over the years. He has also made many visits to Israel – one of which the Israeli government paid for itself.

Mann’s wife, meanwhile, is new MP Jo White. She isn’t Jewish either, but is a vice-chair of Labour Friends of Israel. Pro-Israel lobbyists and groups have happily donated to her. And one of these is Palace Yard Events Ltd, which the government has given over a million pounds to ‘tackle antisemitism’ in the education system.

Humanity-free zones

Countless genocide scholars, legal experts, and human rights groups call Israel’s actions genocide. Among the 70,000+ people it has murdered since 2023, over 20,000 are children.

You might have thought this would have shamed pro-Israel voices into piping down a bit. But they haven’t. They’ve just denied a genocide is happening and kept going, waging firm institutional efforts to suppress any resistance in public life to our government’s complicity in genocide.

As we’ve regularly reported, the UK government has deep links to the Israel lobby, arrested both Jewish and non-Jewish people for opposing genocide, and antisemitically sought to conflate the state of Israel and its crimes with the religion of Judaism.

In service of its commitment to US billionaire-imperialism and its Israeli allies, the government is increasingly trying to silence public expressions of humanity. This normalises the type of repression that the far right (which could very possibly gain power at the next election) won’t hesitate to weaponise even more intensely.

This is all incredibly dangerous. We need to firmly oppose it, and defend our right to fight for humanity.

Featured image via Getty/Leon Neal

By Ed Sykes

Source link