Source link

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

I will be the first to admit that furniture building is not my strong suit.

Despite following instructions, I just can’t quite seem to get it right – no matter how hard I try.

But the Dreams Cosmopolitan Quick-Build Bed has absolutely changed the game. Forget Allen Keys, forget small little screws, the bed comes together so quickly and so easily, it’s practically foolproof.

Advertisement

You simply unfold the frame (which comes flat-packed), insert the centre bar, attach the slats to the top, pop on the frame cover and you’ve mastered it in about 5-10 minutes – it’s wonderful.

If you want to get the job done fast, you can rope in a friend to help – but I think it’s certainly doable with one person (it might just take a little bit longer, although it’s still a far faster process than your usual flatpack furniture build).

Why does the right bed frame matter?

1. Overall health and sleep quality

Having the right bed frame can impact your overall health: if you don’t have a solid, sturdy frame, it can impact sleep quality, which can – in turn – impact physical and mental health.

Advertisement

2. Storage solutions

Bed frames can also act as a very handy storage solution. I don’t have many places to store things in my flat, so I went for one that can also hide my bits and bobs underneath. It’s been incredibly practical and I’d definitely recommend for people living in smaller homes where space, and therefore storage, is limited.

Why should I try this frame?

I can say for a fact that I feel completely supported when I’m sleeping. The bed is strong, sturdy and doesn’t move at all (and I have wooden flooring so I’ve experienced this issue before, it’s not fun).

Advertisement

While it doesn’t come with a headboard (you’d need to purchase one separately), the Dreams Cosmopolitan Quick Build Bed is the ideal purchase for anyone who wants a quick-build bed that’s stylish, contemporary and has a decent amount of storage space.

At just £199, I think it’s absolutely worth the investment.

Source link

The FT has authored a concerning article indicating that the apartheid settler-colony, known as ‘Israel’, has suffered limited economic damage despite three years of genocidal crimes in West Asia.

However, supporters of Palestine shouldn’t despair. The piece indicates that, in the event of meaningful sanctions by the likes of the EU, and a continued exodus of high skilled professionals, the ‘Israel’s’ finances could begin to really suffer.

In the meantime, columnists Mehul Srivastava and James Shotter describe how “restaurants are full” in the settler-colony. This is a grotesque scenario in the Zone of Interest beside the starvation of the Gaza extermination camp.

The pair highlight:

There have been three quarterly contractions during nearly three years of conflict, but growth has rebounded each time.

Amir Yaron, head of the land theft project’s central bank, boasts of a “trampoline under the Holy Land”. It would be easy to write this off as more hasbara nonsense, but at least in its news reporting, the FT doesn’t tend to bullshit.

Its business reporting is aimed at the world’s ruling class who want accurate information that enables them to maintain their dominance. Their readers don’t want propaganda intended to mislead the masses. That’s the job of the Daily Mail, the Sun and similar rags.

‘Israel’ Zionist militech tested on Palestinians

Independent data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) supports the article’s claims. It shows real GDP in ‘Israel’ has continued to grow strongly after an initial hit post-7 October 2023. It has been similar to the growth present prior to that event.

The FT says:

The surprising resilience has been underpinned by a formidable military-industrial complex, a flexible workforce, a large natural gas supply — and two decades of growth that turned Israel into a relatively wealthy, if unequal, nation.

There’s no denying these points either. The Zionist entity is able to build up a successful military and surveillance industry thanks to having a captive population of Palestinians to experiment on.

Sometimes referred to as the ‘Palestine Laboratory‘, the Tel Aviv terror regime eavesdrops on Palestinians’ private phone calls, surveils them further through endless checkpoints and kills them with missiles and drones. These can then be exported as ‘battle-tested’ to any amoral states looking to suppress their own populations.

The “flexible workforce” could be taken two ways. Option one is that workers can be hired and fired easily, given ‘Israel’ operates under a deeply neoliberal business regime. This is especially true for the disposable workers the settler-colony brings in from abroad. They have replaced the “hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in low-skilled jobs” who had their work and entry permits cancelled by the Netanyahu regime.

Option two is that the flexibility lies in the apartheid pseudo-state’s ability to switch their land thieves seamlessly between committing war crimes in Gaza, and a standard 9-5 job. When the state calls up reservists to the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF), it pays their salary by compensating the employer. IOF murderers are even given a bonus on top.

The FT says the fake-state:

…has become adept at sending its population to work one week and war the next, with its high-tech workers able to work from home when the country was shut down in periods of active combat.

US hand-outs let terror economy run on easy mode

The bloodthirsty expansionists can’t manage this perfectly, however. The IOF has at times called up over 50% of a “300-employee cyber security company”, leaving them unable to hit revenue targets.

As for the “large natural gas supply” mentioned by the FT, it helps when you can just steal such resources from the population you subject to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide.

The business-focused media outlet also highlights how ‘Israel’ is “buoyed by US support”. That’s one way to put “receives massive handouts and military support from the world’s hegemon“.

Far from being some hub of innovative geniuses as hasbara tells us, the settler-colony benefits hugely from having a reliable sugar daddy in Washington. The constant torrent of funds from there means the murderers occupying historic Palestine can play the economy game on easy mode.

This certainly makes grim reading for anyone who wants to see the genocidal terrorists punished for their massive crimes. Saying that, The FT does highlight some glimpses of light.

At least 100,000 Israelis have left the country since October 7, mostly high-tech workers, medical professionals and engineers, according to a study by Tel Aviv University.

Al Jazeera puts the figure even higher, at 150,000.

The Financial Times’ journalists also mention the prospects for ‘Israel’ if the likes of Europe ever get serious about trading sanctions. Amnesty International and UN figures have called for the EU-Israel Trade Agreement to be suspended. They rightly argue that under a human rights clause in the contract, the EU must halt the deal.

BDS the only way to crush ‘Israeli’ economy

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign has seen successes, with Co-op supermarkets in Britain and Italy ceasing to stock apartheid goods. ‘Israeli’ products are increasingly off-putting to consumers worldwide.

It’s clear that, especially with ongoing US support, the Zionist entity will not suffer the economic pain required to deter it from ongoing aggression. Only concerted boycotting by people across the world, alongside meaningful sanctions by states, can ensure accountability for the criminal project of mass murder and theft.

Featured image via Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

By Robert Freeman

Source link

2023: Minette Batters attends a No 10 summit | Image: © Tayfun Salci/ZUMA Press Wire / Alamy

3 min read5 hr

Baroness Batters’ enjoyable memoir is an insightful account of her time as head of the NFU and the challenges facing British farmers

Advertisement

This is the story of the emotional journey of a tenant farmer’s daughter who goes from frowned-upon female farm worker to the glass-ceiling-breaking first female president of the nation’s biggest farming organisation.

Offering a behind-the-scenes glimpse into the life of one of the UK’s most prominent farming advocates, Harvest reveals the everyday life struggles that intertwined with consequential moments in our nation’s history. It provides a fly-on-the-wall account of the conversations that shaped our food and farming industry for a generation.

A passionate firsthand account of her battles with self-confidence and gender stereotyping, Minette Batters provides a window into the soul of an industry that is often difficult to understand from the outside.

Advertisement

As the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) first female president, Batters broke down barriers, lifting up other women in the agricultural industry in the process. 

I particularly enjoyed learning about how she somewhat accidentally began her career with the NFU. She attended by chance a local NFU meeting and then with great trepidation progressed through various officer ranks until she ended up as its president.

This unplanned ascent came alongside one of the most consequential periods for British farming. Some may say it was fate: she was ideally qualified to head the organisation post-Brexit – when the farming community needed that strong and authentic leadership the most. 

Advertisement

It provides a fly on the wall account of the conversations that shaped our food and farming industry for a generation

Harvest details how decades-long structural challenges collided with the unexpected withdrawal from the European Union and the removal of the Common Agricultural Policy safety net that masked many of the challenges facing British farming.

At the centre of this national debate on the future of farming sat Batters, navigating through the post-Brexit political turmoil, her deep commitment to farming and her practical approach enabling her to help chart a way forward for the industry.

Advertisement

It was not lost on me reading Harvest how there were similarities between Batter’s journey and my own. Having started as a local community activist and becoming a town councillor purely to serve the area where I was born and raised, I went on to stand in a general election and defeat a former British prime minister. It was therefore particularly amusing to read about the various interactions between Batters and my South West Norfolk constituency predecessor, Liz Truss.

Batters shares how her upbringing and difficult relationship with her father shaped her values and commitment to rural life and the farming industry that she came to protect. Capturing the essence of a deeply proud and dedicated industry, Harvest is punctuated by fascinating profiles of the people that feed our nation every single day – revealing a constantly evolving industry, embracing innovation in the face of a changing world.

Scrap the expensive training courses – reading this book should be mandatory for every civil servant in Defra and any politician tasked with making decisions on behalf of the farming industry. For everyone else, this memoir will make you appreciate where our food comes from and the people that produce the harvest that sustains us.

Terry Jermy is Labour MP for South West Norfolk and chair of the Farming APPG

Harvest: A farmer’s story of heritage, home and hope

By: Minette Batters

Publisher: Ebury Press

Advertisement

Source link

This year, I decided it was time to start growing my own herbs. I’ve already written about my success with mint, which basically grows no matter what – but I’ve kept pretty quiet about my basil project.

That’s because I keep making mistakes. I don’t pinch the plant enough, so it’s grown tall and stringy instead of lush and bushy. While I divided and separated the roots of my supermarket plant, I still don’t think my pots are big enough for the job.

All of this, however, a basil plant can survive. My main issue was the one that can cause it to “rot” and sometimes die: I overwatered it, leading it to wilt and yellow in patches.

Thankfully, I’ve managed to save the affected plants since (though as you can see from the pictures below, I’m still doing a terrible job of pinching off leaves for bushy growth: I find it hard to let go of my growth!).

Advertisement

What happens if you overwater basil?

Per the RHS, overwatering seedlings can lead to fungal diseases, like fatal damping off.

For adult plants, Homes & Gardens added, too much water can lead to a condition called root rot.

This (as the name suggests) leads the roots to brown, become mushy, and partly decay.

As root rot gets worse, it endangers the plant because it stops it from being able to absorb the nutrients and water it needs to grow and stay alive.

Advertisement

What causes overwatering for basil?

Basil likes free-draining soil, which is why it needs drainage holes if stored in a plant pot. Letting it sit in moist soil spells disaster.

At first, I thought that meant I needed to apply smaller doses of water. I was only pouring a little into the saucer under my basil plants (always water them from below: watering basil plants’ leaves can cause fungal growth, too), but I was adding it every day.

Speaking to The Spruce, Jordan Mara, founder of Mind & Soil, explained that that’s about the worst watering mistake I could have made.

Advertisement

You’re far better off giving it deep and infrequent waterings rather than lighter applications of water more regularly, he said.

This not only keeps it hydrated for longer, but “trains the roots of the plant to search down more deeply for water, creating a larger root system,” too.

How often should I water basil?

A deep watering from the base about once a week should do if you’ve got an established plant, Mara said, though factors like the weather and whether your plant is potted or planted could affect that.

Advertisement

Martha Stewart’s site echoed the advice, suggesting about 2.5-5cm of water once a week unless the weather’s really hot.

Meanwhile, Southern Living recommends a more customised approach.

Plunge your finger into the soil, they advise, and only water if the first 5cm is dry.

What are the signs of overwatered basil?

Advertisement

• A bad smell coming from your soil,
• Yellow leaves, especially at the base or top of the plant,
• Wilting stems,
• Brown spots on leaves,
• Droopy, dull leaves,
• Mushy, weak, and/or discoloured roots.

What should I do if I’ve overwatered my basil plant?

I saved most of mine with six steps (and saved my sanity with a seventh):

1) Identify issues quickly

Kim Roman, instructor for Square Foot Gardening, told Martha Stewart: “At the first sign of yellowing leaves, you must immediately inspect for the disease as the spores are fast-moving”.

This, it turned out, was true. The basil plant I figured would work it out in the end has since gone to the great well-drained garden in the sky. Check your plants for signs of overwatering at least once every couple of days.

Advertisement

2) Stop watering immediately

It might sound obvious, but putting more water in your soil at this stage definitely won’t help, Food Gardening Network said.

3) Remove affected areas and clean the rest of the root system

I had some mild root rot, which I confirmed by lifting the soil out of the pot and looking at the roots. If that’s happened to you, shake off any excess soil, run the roots under lukewarm water, and cut off any affected areas (these will be weaker and discoloured).

Advertisement

4) Let the roots dry overnight and disinfect your plant pot

This can help to get rid of any remaining spores which could come back to haunt your basil.

5) Repot your basil in new, fresh soil

If your old pot doesn’t have drainage holes and/or your previous soil was heavy with clay, change them for more free-draining options (terracotta pots with good drainage and a saucer are generally better for basil). Don’t compact your soil, either, as that can cause it to hold onto more water.

Advertisement

6) Trim the leaves

If a lot of your roots have gone, much of your plant’s energy and water channels have been cut off too. You may want to remove some of your plant’s leaves after this process, especially if it’s a big plant.

7) Know when to accept defeat

Sadly, BBC Gardener’s World said, it can be tough to treat root rot in established plants. This is especially true if it’s already affected a lot fo your plant’s roots and leaves, as happened with one of my four plants.

Advertisement

Still, now you get the chance to start all over again. And depending on how long you’ve been growing your basil, odds are you’ve already got a decent return on investment for that sub-£2 supermarket plant.

Source link

Illustration by Tracy Worrall

4 min read3 hr

Lessons in political science. This week: tribal politics

Advertisement

Ten years, huh? Turns out time really does fly when you’re having fun. There is no more fun way to mark – celebrate? commiserate? (delete as applicable) – the 10th anniversary of the Brexit referendum than by reading Sara Hobolt and James Tilley’s excellent new book, Tribal Politics: How Brexit Divided Britain. It’s a model of social science, packed with data, yet clearly written, and enlivened by a string of digs at the wackier side of the last decade: terrible Brexit novels, conspiracy theories about pencils at polling stations, that Cambridge economist who turned up for a departmental meeting naked – with “Brexit Leaves Britain Naked” written across her breasts – and much more.

The book charts how the process of Brexit – both the referendum and the years of joy that followed – created two distinct political tribes in Britain. These tribes did not exist in any meaningful form prior to 2016, yet the referendum forced people to pick a side, even people who might previously have been relatively lukewarm one way or the other, and then what we might euphemistically call the lack of plain sailing thereafter helped reinforce those identities, creating ingroups (us: clever, honest, open-minded) and outgroups (them: selfish, hypocritical, closed-minded).

Advertisement

For most of the period since the referendum, more people saw themselves as remainers or leavers than supporters of all the political parties combined. And while the extent of this identity has dipped a little recently, its intensity has not. To quote the example the authors give: while most Lib Dem supporters say their identity is “not very important” to them (you can insert your own joke here), those who see themselves as remainers and leavers say that identity is “very important”. Even 10 years on, majorities of remainers and leavers still say “we” when talking about their side.

We often think that Americans are politically divided, but discrimination by one Brexit tribe against the other is as, or more, widespread than partisan discrimination by Democrats and Republicans. Almost all of this is pretty symmetrical, by the way. Although there are some differences – remainers being slightly worse than leavers – these are outweighed by the similarities. For the most part, your lot are just as bad as their lot.

From a 200-plus-page data-heavy book, containing 30 tables and over 40 graphs, it’s difficult to pull out individual highlights, but if I have a favourite graph – and I am the sort of person to have a favourite graph – then it is Figure 7.5, which tracks people’s attitudes on the state of the economy. The beauty with this one is that it reports the attitudes held by the same people both before and after the referendum. From it, we know that back in 2014, 2015 and 2016 those individuals who went on to become leavers and remainers felt almost identically about how well the economy was doing. Yet as soon as the referendum result was announced, a gap opened up, largely as a result of remainers suddenly thinking everything was going to pot, and that gap has persisted since. The same thing is even true when people were talking about their own finances; after the referendum, remainers suddenly felt personally poorer, while leavers felt richer, even though at that point nothing very much had changed either way. Partisanship is, as the saying goes, a hell of a drug.

A new paper in Political Behavior finds a similar pattern in the US with Tesla. Pre-2024, there was relatively little difference between the way Democrats and Republicans saw the car. Yet after Elon Musk threw in his lot with Donald Trump in 2024, and then led Doge, views began to diverge across different criteria: likelihood to buy, perceptions of quality, reputation, whether there was a buzz about it, and so on. The cars didn’t change, but how Americans saw them did, in ways that were overwhelmingly driven by their party loyalties. 

Advertisement

Further reading: S Hobolt and J Tilley, Tribal Politics: How Brexit Divided Britain (2026); K Endres et al, Tesla Takedown: Brand Politicization and Partisan Consumerism in the Trump Era, Political Behavior (2026)

Source link

Long before we knew her for the likes of Mamma Mia!, Mank and The Dropout, Amanda Seyfried found international fame playing Karen in the 2004 teen comedy Mean Girls, and witnessed her co-star Lindsay Lohan’s struggles in the industry up close.

Opening up about her friendship with Lindsay in a new British GQ interview, Amanda recalled how, although they were the same age when they appeared together in the Tina Fey-penned movie, the level of attention they received was nowhere near equal.

“[I] wasn’t working at that level,” she said. “The spotlight was on her, no matter what she did.”

Amanda said she saw in real time how Lindsay went from being Hollywood’s hottest star to having the tabloids praying for her downfall.

Advertisement

Michael Gibson/Paramount/Kobal/Shutterstock

“The outsized bashing is ugly,” said Amanda. “It’s like, a fear of mine. I would not want to be spotlit for being infamous in any way.”

During the same GQ article, Lindsay spoke fondly of the Oscar nominee, opening up about their continued friendship.

“We’ve stayed close because there’s genuine trust and respect between us,” the Freaky Friday actor claimed. “What started as shared experience has grown into a meaningful friendship over time.

“Now we talk more about life, motherhood and our families. She’s always someone I can rely on. That consistency is rare and something I really cherish.”

Advertisement

Although Amanda may have been mostly unscathed from the press during the era of paparazzi upskirting starlets and tabloids plotting the downfall of young women, it wasn’t because she didn’t go out clubbing.

“Did I find myself at Val Kilmer’s house one night at 1am with [Mean Girls co-stars] Daniel Franzese and Jonathan Bennett? Did I find myself there with them in the pool? I was 18 and I had just moved to LA and we had gone to a screening of Reefer Madness. I was at Val Kilmer’s house – I don’t even remember meeting him, but I was at his house,” she recalled about her “ridiculous” 20s.

On the red carpet of the 2024 Mean Girls musical adaptation, Lindsay also sang the praises of her 2004 co-stars Amanda and Lacey Chabert, who played Gretchen Wieners.

“I love Amanda and she’s done so well with her career,” Lindsay said. “She’s such a great actress and Lacey as well. We’re good friends and that’s what matters most.”

Source link

Rihanna Kelver, a transgender woman in Wyoming, is facing felony charges for pulling a weapon to defend herself after being subject to homophobic and transphobic slurs. Slate magazine reported that Kelver was about to end a work shift when several men on the street began yelling slurs at her. Then:

Moments later, according to court testimony and surveillance footage, the man shoved Kelver to the ground hard enough to injure her tailbone.

Kelver responded by drawing a pistol from her bag, chambering a round, and pointing the weapon at the man who had pushed her. She kept the safety on and never fired. The man and his companions retreated.

However, the man who shoved Kelver and began the confrontation has not been charged. But, Kelver is now facing charges of aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent. If found guilty, she could face up to 15 years in prison.

For a nation as heavily invested in stand-your-ground as the US, Rihanna’s fight in court has become one that shows the systemic homophobia and transphobia in the justice system.

Kelver and ‘stand your ground’

Kelve’s arrest seemingly contradicts the Wyoming “Stand your ground” law, permitting an individual the right to defend themselves. In spite of the evidence presented, the man who assaulted her, (referred to as Durham) hasn’t faced a single charge. Kelver has had to leave her job due to her charges and faces an arraignment on the 24th of June 2026.

Many LGBTQ+ news and advocacy platforms have reported on her case, highlighting the unfairness and hypocrisy of the situation. They point out the irony that in a nation so proud of it’s citizen’s ability to arm themselves, the moment a trans person uses it against bigotry, it is criminalized. As Slate concluded:

Kelver’s experience also fits a long and troubling history of transgender people being punished for their acts of survival.

Kelver’s case can be used as a clear example of the double standards applied to queer and specifically trans people in the justice system. And for the queer community it’s seen as evidence of how queer people are not protected by the law to the same standards as others.

The system is not broken

Kelver’s arrest is not a new phenomenon but instead just the latest in a repeated history of LGBTQ+ individuals being punished for defending themselves. In 2014 CeCe McDonald was arrested and almost faced 40 years in prison after defending herself against a group of white people screaming racist and transphobic remarks and then physically assaulting her. In 2011 Ky Peterson was arrested and convicted for murdering his rapist and was only released after 9 years of imprisonment. These two examples are also notable because they involved Black trans people. The US justice system is not only queerphobic and transphobic, but deeply racist and anti-Black.  There is a fundamental ideology within the justice system itself to not only punish marginalized individuals for protecting themselves, but actively working to criminalize those same communities.

Activist Peter Gelderloos wrote on Truthout:

When transgender or queer people defend themselves from such violence, the law usually steps in to pick up where the vigilantes left off… White people who attack people of color who are crossing borders or transgressing “socially accepted” ways of behavior are defending their “selves” as those selves exist within society (and there is no other kind of self). Heterosexual people and cis-gendered people are defending those white heteronormative persons’ sense of self.

Despite LGBTQ+ people and people of colour being far more vulnerable to violent acts of hate, we are routinely punished for defending ourselves. And that is by design.

This is due to these systems of ‘justice’ being built out of the very systems that perpetuate our communities marginalization. Institutionalized ‘justice’ becomes a means of preserving a white supremacist and queerphobic hierarchy. When most self-defense laws were formed amongst Western countries, they wasn’t made with the majority of the population in mind. Like many laws, they were made to benefit a small privileged group, whilst purposely criminalising minorities for defending themselves from attack.

This is the system working as intended.

The death of rainbow capitalism

The arrest of Rihanna Kelver and the perpetuation of queer and marginalized injustice adds to a growing sentiment within the queer community. As we reach the middle of Pride month, many in the community have pointed out a noticeable decrease in the typical corporate advertising and promoting. Whereas before, companies would share posts, change logos and create merchandise, it has been replaced by rather abrupt silence.

Corporations tendencies during pride were referred to as “rainbow capitalism”, and was commonly met with annoyance by the queer community. It was generally understood that these gestures weren’t actual indicators of support but a means to seem progressive in order to drive more profits. However whilst the dramatic absence of rainbow capitalism is celebrated by some, it is seen as a grim indicator by others.

Cases like Kelver’s and lack of corporate support during pride, for some in the community isn’t just an indicator of progressive stagnation but in fact a regression. Capitalism may not indicate morality but it can reflect our culture. And with the many recent events happening across the world, it is clear for queer communities that there is a resurgence in far-right ideology. Rolling back queer rights is rapidly gaining popularity.

Pride is resistance

Of course, none of this is to argue that corporations should engage in pinkwashing during pride month. Instead, the death of rainbow capitalism is a sign that neoliberal capitalism has found that it is no longer necessary to pay lip service to queer rights. That, in turn, can be explained by the vicious bigotry from both the UK and US administrations who have normalised the creeping rise of transphobia.

Despite Pride this year possibly highlighting the ways culture has started to regress, it also represents our perseverance as a community. The reason Pride month exists today is due to the fighting and resistance of our queer forebears. Just as Rihanna Kelver herself is still fighting the legal battle for her right to protect herself, we as community must keep fighting and uplifting each other against this bigoted system.

Featured image via Getty/Heather Diehl

By Olaitan Mos-Shogbamimu

Source link

Source link

Elon Musk — the seig-heiling owner of X — has become the world’s first trillionaire. As we’ll explain, he’s achieved this by leveraging his power, influence and shamelessness to prove that capitalism is every bit as rotten as we said it is.

However, if you ask one of the many thoughtless establishment journalists out there how he became so wealthy, they’ll tell you ‘Elon gets lots of money because he makes rockets good‘.

Amid all the predictable seething jealousy and bitter resentment to this news, I’d like to congratulate @elonmusk on an astounding achievement. He’s got there by being the most driven, creative, hard-working and ambitious business genius in history. Salut, Elon! pic.twitter.com/MmrygoJfwc

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) June 13, 2026

Advertisement

In turn, we’d like to congratulate Piers Morgan for fitting Musk’s entire boot in his mouth.

He got here by being the most hard-working suck-up in the entire Western media.

Salut, Piers! 

Musk games the market

First, we should explain how Elon Musk became a trillionaire.

Musk’s wealth just exploded because he’s taken SpaceX from a private company to a public one. By SpaceX, we mean the three companies that make up SpaceX, which are:

• SpaceX: The intergalactic company famous for its exploding rockets (what they call “rapid unscheduled disassemblies“)
• StarLink: The satellite internet company
• Grok AI: The AI model which is mostly localised to X (and which notoriously spent several weeks producing revenge porn and child sexual abuse material before government’s demanded Musk stop it)

Of the three companies:

• SpaceX is not profitable.
• StarLink is profitable.
• Grok AI is really not profitable.

SpaceX could be profitable in the future, as long as we keep finding new reasons to send thousands of rockets into space. StarLink could remain profitable, but the market for satellite internet is limited to customers who:

• Can’t access broadband
• Can pay for fancy satellite internet

Grok AI will probably never be profitable. OpenAI and Anthropic are both doing better than Grok, and it looks like they have no realistic path towards profitability either. The problem is AI costs so much to run that when you charge companies an honest price (instead of subsidising the cost with billionaire investor money) they abandon the product.

NEW: Uber is reportedly capping employee use of AI vibe-coding tools at $1,500 per month after blowing through its AI budget.

— Polymarket (@Polymarket) June 2, 2026

Musk and his company losses

Right, so SpaceX is not what you’d call a profitable company. In fact, it made a $4.9 billion loss last year. But despite this, when it went public, it achieved a valuation of $2 trillion.

This is the largest Initial Public Offering (IPO) of all time. On paper, it means SpaceX is more valuable than most companies which actually make money. If you’re confused that isn’t because you’re not getting it; it’s because it doesn’t make sense. It also gets worse.

To be fair to Musk, he does have a plan to make his company profitable, and that plan is data centres in space. The problem is that these data centres would almost certainly be more expensive than the terrestrial ones. They may also be physically impossible to build at scale.

Think physics before you believe in the SpaceX lies. Each data center averages 10 million pounds of servers, imagine halling multiple data centers into space.
Data centers use millions of gallons of water for cooling. Vacuum of space is terrible for cooling. https://t.co/8Hy3shaby1 pic.twitter.com/tsQQAjvkDk

— MrsDoubtFire (@MrsDoubtFireSF) June 12, 2026

Who could have guessed it would be less cost-effective to build something in space? Good lord.

And this isn’t the first time Musk has promised the impossible. There’s a site that tracks his broken promises called elonmusk.today. Examples include:

• 1,645 days since Elon Musk said he would take carbon out of the air and use it for rocket fuel
• 1,939 days since Elon Musk promised Starlink customers their speed would double by the end of 2021
• 2,166 days since Elon Musk said that people who get brain surgery from him could pay for it with augmented brain powers
• 2,327 days since Elon Musk advised consumers that Teslas can safely function as a boat for short periods of time
• 2,611 days since Elon Musk said there will be a million fully autonomous Tesla robotaxis in a year
• 2,714 days since Elon Musk said the new Roadster will use rocket technology that will allow it to fly
• 2,824 days since Elon Musk said SpaceX would probably build a base on Mars by 2028

Why does Musk make such wild claims? Almost certainly because doing so draws attention away from the fact that his companies have been mostly unprofitable, and because the pie-in-the-sky promises cause the value of his companies to rise.

How does this keep happening?

As you can see, it’s both quantifiable and widely understood that Musk’s companies are valued way above their actual — you know — value.

So why do investors keep falling for it?

Simply incredible. Elon has mastered the art of creating valuable companies that don’t actually make money. https://t.co/HYJrHduvoJ

— D (@_Unknown_D_) June 12, 2026

There are two things to bear in mind: the first is why wouldn’t they keep falling for it? In the short term, their stocks become more valuable. In the long term, well, nobody is thinking about the long term.

The other thing to be aware of is that a lot of this stuff is now algorithmic.

For example, the Chosun Daily reported:

Algorithmic trading programs that use automated pre-set trading instructions to execute orders have recently been blamed for the sharp fluctuations in global stock markets. While algorithmic trading programs offer the advantage of buying and selling assets without human intervention, they also have the drawback of triggering massive sell-offs whenever the set conditions are met, increasing market volatility.

This works in the opposite direction too. What this means is that when Musk promises the world’s first self-driving flying car, the algorithms auto-buy Tesla stock. As Chosun Daily added:

Investment bank Goldman Sachs estimated that algorithmic trading accounted for about 60% to 70% of all trades in the U.S. in 2016. Experts believe this figure has now risen to 70% to 80%.

We may not live in the Matrix, but we definitely live in a matrix.

Client media

Now that we’ve explained what the establishment media is mostly ignoring, we can gawp at some of the wretched client journalists who are defending Musk’s ‘success’.

Andrew Neil led the charge on this front, asking “What difference does it make?” if one man’s wealth is higher than the GDP of most countries.

This is one case where the public can see with their own eyes that this shit sucks. They don’t have to be told the Nazi zillionaire is bad for them and for the species, and no amount of behaving like a cunt on the internet is going to change that. pic.twitter.com/DGBXf48zpF

— Flying_Rodent (@flying_rodent) June 13, 2026

Imagine the worst person you know, and then imagine that they had more money to play around with than Israel spends in a year. Obviously, this would not end well.

And we’ve  seen what Musk uses his wealth to achieve.

The influence campaign didn’t stop there either, as the Canary reported, and many pointed out:

With his inordinate wealth he is bolstering the far right in my country – who support austerity politics, tax cuts for the wealthy, oppose public investment, brexit and aims to deport people which will cause major disturbances to our public services.

This directly affects my… https://t.co/PCL9l9yP0k

— JimmyTheGiant (@jimthegiant) June 12, 2026

Advertisement

He used his wealth to buy a whole ass social media platform to start a race war https://t.co/14l8nI5MDI

— NJ (@NoJusticeMTG) June 12, 2026

Musk also uses X to boost his ideological bedfellows (which include Nazis).

It is however the only social media that pays politicians and journalists based on whether they agree with his reactionary views, not whether people like their content. Sometimes tens of thousands of dollars. Unaccounted. https://t.co/o7AsW8gCTV

— Alonso Gurmendi (@Alonso_GD) June 13, 2026

Human haemorrhoid, Neil, also did the meme:

Of course Andrew is now doing the meme pic.twitter.com/Ew4ulxgdJH

— NFT Hibou (@NFT_Hibou) June 13, 2026

Columnist and ex-prime minister, Boris Johnson, got in on the action too.

'Ego-driven lust' drives capitalism says Boris Johnson, who knows zilch about business, never understood it as a journalist, as a Mayor or as PM. He is simply wrong – in media ego sometimes does come first; BUT in business school, in boardrooms, in rooms where it happens, ego is… pic.twitter.com/oINZ7VwCGr

— David Yelland (@davidyelland) June 13, 2026

This is fine, if you’re idea of success is a series of obscenely overvalued companies that rely on government handouts while failing to deliver on most of their promises.

It’s not for nothing that Chinese electric vehicles are now more advanced and cheaper than Teslas. Those companies also benefit from state money, but said money is directed into research and development — not into inflating the ego of the world’s most insecure nerd.

Julia Hartley-Brewer had this to say:

Why don't you set up a business making rockets, electric cars and AI, Lewis? It's obviously so easy to do, anyone can do it. https://t.co/7XRtcHT5lB

— Julia Hartley-Brewer (@JuliaHB1) June 12, 2026

Advertisement

The problem? Musk has never designed or built any of his products. He just profited from those who did.

This literally shows workers doing all the work lol https://t.co/VsnzAA9ZmK

— polen (@polen_ball) June 14, 2026

Advertisement

We also don’t have to go back that far to see an example of space travel being pursued for the sake of exploration over ego.

“Bernie, your socialism would never allow a SpaceX to be built.”

Hey Bill, who got man to the moon? Was it the government or the private sector? https://t.co/mrBYaXZ4vC

Advertisement

— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) June 13, 2026

Okay, so the space race did happen to boost America’s ego, but you get the point.

Perhaps the worst defence was this:

Elon literally owns this site, so every time he uses it, with his 240m followers, he is working. https://t.co/I2qelyZ8L7

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) June 13, 2026

The great IPO swindle

There’s another way Musk has used his great wealth to disadvantage the broader public that we’ve not covered yet.

SpaceX isn’t just being listed on various stock exchanges; it’s being fast-tracked. What this means is that various stock-buying schemes like 401(k) retirement plans will automatically buy SpaceX stock.

Usually, a company has to be publicly available for a year to demonstrate its value is legitimate. SpaceX, however, will wait a mere five days in some instances.

SHOCKER: S&P 500 will NOT fast track SpaceX. So it will take AT LEAST a year, probably more. This is wild considering every other big boy index is 5-15 days. This could create significant return dispersion bt 'passive' indexes. Choose wisely. https://t.co/EG7R5IfX0u

— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) June 4, 2026

Advertisement

In other words, Musk has used his influence to ensure as many ordinary people as possible buy shares in his unprofitable business. If the business remains unprofitable, these same ordinary people who will lose out.

Top to bottom misery

The other thing to note about Musk having so much money is that it doesn’t even make him happy.

Hasan Piker noted:

Elon Musk is a fucking failure and yet in spite of his failures, because he happened to be at the right place at the right time, he has failed upwards with his endless wealth. He’s a horrible person, an unbelievably insecure person, and yet he’s the richest person on the planet. We know he doesn’t fucking work hard because he Tweets all the goddamn time.

We live in a society that is based on wealth accumulation, and yet the man who’s accumulated more than anyone is the most miserable person on the planet.

Maybe it’s time to rethink this capitalism malarkey?

Featured image via Spencer Platt/ Hoda Davaine / Hollie Adams/ Getty Images

By Willem Moore

Source link