Beth Hammack, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, during a research conference at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas in Dallas, Texas, US, on Friday, Oct. 31, 2025.

Desiree Rios | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Federal Reserve officials who voted this week against the decision to hold interest rates steady said Friday they favor hiking now as a way to stave off inflation.

Advertisement

“In my view, now is the time for the [Federal Open Market Committee] to act to speed the return of PCE inflation to our 2 percent objective and deliver on our commitment to price stability for the American people,” Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said in a statement. “The longer that high inflation persists, the more challenging and costly it can be to bring it back down.”

Similarly, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said in a separate statement that he believes small hikes now can prevent the need for larger moves later.

“In my view, a potential series of small policy moves would be better than waiting and eventually concluding that even bolder actions were necessary,” he said.

Kashkari and Hammack joined Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan in dissenting against holding the Fed’s key overnight borrowing rate in a range between 3.5%-3.75%. The other nine voting members of the FOMC voted in favor of keeping the rate steady, where it has been all year following a series of three cuts in the latter part of 2025.

Advertisement

Inflation has held above the Fed’s 2% target for more than five years, spiking again this war following the Iran war and the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

Logan said the Fed can’t count on an unexpected jolt to the economy to lower inflation and needs to be proactive.

“Labor, consumption and financial market conditions indicate that monetary policy is not restraining the economy,” she said, also in a prepared statement. “Without any policy restraint, inflation will likely continue to trend above target until there’s an unanticipated shock.”

Though price increases eased in June as Middle East tensions briefly eased, energy costs again have risen and generated fears that the Fed will have to tighten.

Though he voted in favor of the hold, Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh said he remains resolute in getting inflation back to target.

Advertisement

“We have begun a new chapter, and we understand that the five-plus years of inflation above target cannot be cured in nine weeks — or by a single month of modest price decreases,” he said.

However, Hammack said she is “not confident it will return to our objective on its own.”

“Supply-side factors, including energy prices, have boosted inflation this year, but I see inflationary pressures coming from the demand side of the economy, as well,” she added.

Hammack said her constituents in the Cleveland area have been describing “pricing pressures as broadening rather than fading, and consumers are expressing despair over persistently higher prices.”

Advertisement

For his part, Kashkari’s comments harken back to both the 1970s period of high inflation and the more recent episodes in which Fed officials initially dismissed the flare-up as “transitory” and brought on up issues related to the Covid pandemic.

“Economic theory argues that monetary policy is the right tool to address demand-driven inflation but faces greater trade-offs when dealing with supply shocks,” he said, adding, “I increasingly believe that monetary policy does have an important role to play in addressing a series of successive supply shocks that might lead to entrenched higher inflation.”

Logan is expected to release a statement explaining her vote later Friday morning.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Source link

Apple (AAPL) stock opened sharply lower on Friday at $304, down more than 9%. Weak fiscal fourth-quarter guidance overshadowed a record June quarter that beat estimates on revenue and earnings.

Shares closed Thursday at $333.43, down 1.41%, days after Apple briefly touched a $5 trillion valuation.

Record Quarter Meets Cautious Guidance

Apple reported June-quarter revenue of $109.42 billion, above the $108.65 billion consensus. Earnings per share reached $2.02, well above the $1.89 estimate. The full results showed revenue up 16% year over year, a June-quarter record.

iPhone revenue climbed 22% to $54.25 billion, while Mac sales jumped 29% to $10.35 billion. However, Services revenue of $30.74 billion and Greater China sales of $18.82 billion both missed forecasts.

The outlook did the real damage. CFO Kevan Parekh guided September-quarter revenue growth of 9%–11%, below the roughly 12% analysts expected. He cited supply constraints, currency headwinds, and a memory cost squeeze driven by AI demand for DRAM and NAND chips.

The report also marked Tim Cook’s final earnings call as CEO. John Ternus, who takes over on September 1, told analysts Apple sees a major opportunity in AI.

Expanding Volume and RSI at 62 Keep Buyers Interested

Before the guidance shock, the daily chart looked firmly bullish. AAPL corrected only modestly from its $344.57 all-time high, holding a fresh support zone around $333. That area capped price in mid-July before the breakout, a classic resistance-turned-support flip.

Momentum backs that read. The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits near 62, just below firmly bullish territory. Meanwhile, trading volume has expanded in recent sessions, a sign of growing participation. That combination fueled the milestone run to a $5 trillion valuation earlier this week.

If the weakness holds, $280 becomes the immediate battleground. The level rejected price in February and caught the sharp early-July dip.

AAPL Price Prediction Hinges on the $315 Zone

Earnings gap-downs sometimes retrace once the initial selling fades. If buyers reclaim $315 in the coming sessions, the structure of higher highs and higher lows stays intact. A recovery of the $333 zone would then put the $344.57 record back in play, roughly 12% above premarket levels.

Failure to reclaim $315 keeps sellers in control and exposes $280. That would mark the deepest correction since the early-July pullback.

Two catalysts could decide the outcome. Long-term memory supply agreements would ease the margin fears behind the weak guidance. Additionally, the redesigned Siri launch this fall could revive the AI optimism that a July forecast identified as a key driver of the rally.

The next few sessions come down to one question. Either buyers set up an attempt at $315, or the post-earnings gap grows into a broader trend reversal.

The post Apple Stock Slips After Earnings: Can $280 Hold the Line for a New All-Time High? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Source link

Champpixs | Istock | Getty Images

The stock market looked unusually tranquil. Beneath the surface, one of Wall Street’s fastest-growing funds devoted to artificial intelligence investments was unraveling.

In a matter of weeks, Leopold Aschenbrenner’s Situational Awareness went from managing roughly $45 billion to being forced into a sweeping reduction of its listed-stock positions as a historic momentum reversal triggered losses on both sides of its portfolio and set off margin calls and compulsory sales.

Advertisement

Situational Awareness had built concentrated positions in one of Wall Street’s most popular trades: owning companies expected to supply the chips, data centers, power and other infrastructure behind the AI boom while betting against software firms viewed as vulnerable to the technology’s disruption.

Its long positions were concentrated among some of the market’s biggest AI beneficiaries. Public filings showed large stakes in Nebius, Bloom Energy, Sandisk, CoreWeave, SharonAI and IREN as of March 31. By Wednesday’s close, those shares had fallen between by 50% and 78% from recent peaks.

At the same time, software stocks like Adobe that had been used as the short leg of the trade rallied. That meant the fund wasn’t protected by its hedges. Instead, the longs and shorts lost money simultaneously.

“People get over leveraged in this market, and they get seduced by the big returns that some of these companies can deliver,” said Bob Lang, founder and chief strategist at Explosive Options. “If you’re not managing your risk properly, this is the sort of thing that’s going to happen to you.”

Advertisement

As the value of the portfolio fell, the fund’s equity cushion shrank and its prime brokers demanded additional collateral. Raising cash required selling more holdings, adding further pressure to sliding stocks and generating additional losses. What might otherwise have been a painful drawdown became a deleveraging spiral. Ken Griffin’s Citadel hedge fund reached a deal to buy the fund’s publicly traded assets.

“Running somebody out the door like this is as old as time,” Lang said. “I’ve seen it happen a lot in oil markets … there’s a lot of things that are happening underneath the surface that we really don’t know about.”

Momentum crash

The episode offers a stark example of how a hedge fund can sustain devastating losses even when major stock indexes appear relatively calm. The S&P 500 remained near record levels as the damage unfolded, masking one of the most violent reversals in market leadership in decades.

“There is no other way to put it, we just witnessed the largest/ fastest momentum crash in modern history,” Jonathan Krinsky, chief market technician at BTIG, said in a note. “And it wasn’t particularly close.”

Advertisement

Morgan Stanley’s sector-neutral Momentum Index tumbled 17.4% in just four trading days, its worst such decline on record, according to BTIG. The drop surpassed the momentum reversals that followed the dot-com bust, the pandemic shock and the 2022 inflation-driven bear market.

The iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF posted its best month ever as recently as April, and is now on pace for its worst month, illustrating how quickly one of the year’s strongest strategies turned into one of its weakest.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF year to date

Advertisement

Clearing event?

AI infrastructure stocks rebounded sharply Thursday as investors increasingly interpreted the previous several weeks of volatility as the product of a technical dislocation rather than a deterioration in the industry’s fundamentals.

With one of the market’s largest forced sellers stepping back, traders rushed into many of the same chipmakers, power companies and data-center plays that had been at the center of the selloff. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite jumped for a second day Friday, on track for a weekly gain of 0.9% after suffering steep losses the last two weeks.

Nasdaq Composite 5 days

Advertisement

Still, not everyone believes the forced unwind marks the end of the AI selloff.

Among the most prominent skeptics is Michael Burry of “The Big Short” fame. Burry has been one of Wall Street’s most vocal critics of the AI boom, arguing that much of the industry’s demand is being sustained by financing arrangements rather than end customers.

Rather than viewing Thursday’s rebound as a turning point, Burry used the rally to add to bearish positions in Micron, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF and Nvidia put options, according to a Thursday Substack post.

“The knee jerk reaction to the Paired Momentum unwind yesterday has been to put it back on today,” Burry wrote. “This was a historic reversal, even more so than what happened 26 years ago,” when the dot-com bubble began to burst in 2000.

Advertisement

Burry said oversold and overbought conditions made a short-term bounce unsurprising, but he questioned whether the trade still had staying power.

“The legs,” Burry wrote, already “they look tired.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Source link

Wintermute reported that institutional investors accounted for a record 72% of spot OTC trading volume on its desk in the first half of 2026, up from roughly 61% in the second half of 2024, a structural shift that the firm says makes broad-based altcoin rallies significantly less likely going forward.

The implication is direct: the capital formation mechanism that historically sent profits cascading from Bitcoin into ETH and then down the altcoin long tail is no longer functioning the same way, and retail traders still positioning for an indiscriminate altseason may be running an outdated playbook.

Discover: Everyone’s Got a Take. Get Free $25 to Actually Trade Yours

Wintermute: Capital Is Concentrating, Not Dispersing

Wintermute’s analysis frames the shift as fundamentally about mandate-driven versus speculation-driven capital. Institutional participants operate under defined risk limits and hold positions over longer periods, which means their flow concentrates in assets with demonstrated liquidity, regulatory clarity, and identifiable fundamentals, not in tokens riding narrative momentum.

The report noted that realized volatility has declined from roughly 70% in earlier market cycles to around 45% in the current one, a direct consequence of institutional order flow replacing retail-driven speculation as the marginal price setter.

Lower volatility compresses the explosive upside that defined 2021-style altseasons, but it also reduces the severity of the unwind.

For traders, the operational takeaway is that OTC block flow, executed away from public order books, is increasingly where price direction gets established. Retail participants reacting to exchange order book moves may consistently find themselves a step behind positioning that was set in bilateral institutional trades.

This dynamic is visible in the institutional infrastructure buildout accelerating across major crypto venues.

Discover: Your Market Calls Are Worth Something. Start With Free $25 on Kalshi

RWA Tokenization as the Institutional On-Ramp

The tokenized real-world asset market reached $31 billion in H1 2026, representing roughly a 50% increase over the prior period, according to Wintermute’s data.

Average monthly transfer volume more than doubled to $9 billion, which signals operational adoption rather than speculative positioning, institutions are moving these assets, not just accumulating them.

The primary instruments attracting institutional capital are U.S. Treasuries, money market funds, and private credit, yield-bearing products where blockchain infrastructure delivers settlement efficiency and programmatic compliance without changing the underlying risk-return profile. This is not institutions chasing crypto-native yield; it is traditional finance running familiar instruments on new rails.

Wintermute also noted that altcoin options notional volume on its OTC desk increased approximately 3.4 times from the second half of 2025 to the first half of 2026, driven by yield-seeking strategies rather than outright directional bets.

Contracts for difference are being deployed across a wider range of tokens for hedging and basket strategies. The derivatives expansion reinforces the same thesis: institutional participants want structured exposure, not raw token speculation. The pattern mirrors broader institutional demand for collateral-grade crypto assets with defined utility.

Discover: Get Paid to Be Right, $25 to Start on Kalshi

The post Wintermute Data Shows Institutional Flow Is Killing Broad Altcoin Rallies appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Source link

Bitcoin is still under pressure across the higher time frame despite stabilizing above recent swing lows. While the short-term structure has shifted into consolidation, the broader trend continues to favor sellers unless BTC can reclaim several key resistance levels.

Meanwhile, futures market data shows aggressive market buying beginning to return, potentially laying the groundwork for a relief rally if the price confirms the move.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

The daily chart shows BTC trading around $63.3K after its sharp late May breakdown from the $74K region. The selloff pushed the asset well below both the 100-day moving average, currently around $69K, and the 200-day moving average near $71K, leaving the broader market structure bearish.

Since the decline, BTC has entered a sideways consolidation between roughly $60K and $67K. Buyers have repeatedly defended the lower boundary of this range, while the $67K resistance zone continues to cap every recovery attempt.

Beyond the major resistance at $67K, the confluence of the 200-day moving average and the $72K to $74K supply zone is the next potential target, if an upside move materializes. A successful reclaim of those levels would improve the medium-term outlook and could expose the next resistance around $82.5K.

On the downside, immediate support remains around $60K. Losing this level would likely shift attention toward the broader support area around $54K if selling pressure accelerates, which will make the bear market both longer and deeper.

BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart

The 4-hour timeframe shows Bitcoin consolidating after breaking below a rising channel that had supported the recovery throughout July. The channel breakdown suggests that bullish momentum has weakened and that the recent advance has transitioned into a corrective phase.

The price is currently testing the short-term support around $63K to $63.5K after rejecting the $65K resistance area. As long as this support holds, BTC could continue ranging inside this zone or potentially have another go at the $65K resistance in the coming weeks. On the other hand, a decisive breakdown below $63K would likely increase the probability of another move toward the previous demand zone around $60K.

On the upside, reclaiming the resistance area around $65K to $65.5K would be the first indication that buyers are regaining control, with the broader resistance near $67K remaining the key hurdle for a stronger recovery.

Sentiment Analysis

The Taker Buy Sell Ratio offers insight into whether market participants are executing more aggressive buy orders or sell orders. Values above 1 generally indicate buyers are taking the initiative, while readings below 1 suggest sellers remain dominant.

Although Bitcoin’s price has remained trapped near $64K, the 100-period EMA of the Taker Buy Sell Ratio has climbed above the neutral 1.0 level and continues to hold above the threshold. This divergence indicates that aggressive buying activity has strengthened even as price has failed to respond meaningfully.

Historically, sustained periods where taker buying leads while price consolidates can precede stronger directional moves if spot demand eventually absorbs overhead supply. While this does not guarantee an immediate breakout, it suggests underlying demand is improving beneath the surface.

For now, this bullish futures signal still requires confirmation from price. A break above the $67K resistance zone would align improving order flow with bullish price action, while a loss of the $60K support area would invalidate the near-term constructive outlook despite the positive shift in taker behavior, and potentially lead to another long liquidation cascade.

The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Is BTC Heading Below $60K After the Latest Rejection? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent posted a lengthy statement on X on July 30, 2026 demanding the Senate vote immediately on the Clarity Act, closing with Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto’s dismissal, that he had no time to convince those who don’t understand, in what amounted to the most aggressive public pressure campaign from a sitting Treasury Secretary on crypto legislation in recent memory.

The move followed Bessent’s earlier Wall Street Journal op-ed arguing the U.S. risks forfeiting its role as a global financial leader if Congress fails to act.

Bessent argued that Senate Banking and Agriculture Committee staff had spent thousands of hours negotiating bipartisan revisions since the House passed the Clarity Act over a year ago, and that Republicans now have a floor-ready bill awaiting a vote. His post framed the Democratic holdout not as principled opposition but as political deference to Warren’s bloc, a direct accusation that the delay is manufactured rather than substantive.

The op-ed Bessent published through The Hill made the economic case explicitly: the U.S. risks pushing the digital assets industry offshore through regulatory inaction, ceding ground that cannot easily be reclaimed.

He pointed to the GENIUS Act, signed into law last year and establishing the first federal stablecoin framework, as proof that bipartisan progress is achievable when the political will exists.

“The U.S. didn’t become the world’s financial center by hesitating in moments of technological change. It led by setting standards that others followed. By passing comprehensive digital-asset market-structure legislation, Congress will ensure that the next generation of financial innovation is built on American rails, backed by American institutions, and denominated in American dollars.”

Bessent also pushed back on Democratic claims that the bill lacks consumer protections, arguing that Titles II and III would substantially expand compliance requirements for digital asset intermediaries, moving them closer to the standards applied to traditional financial institutions.

He additionally defended the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provision within the Clarity Act, which protects decentralized software developers from Bank Secrecy Act registration requirements, noting the Fraternal Order of Police, which previously opposed the measure, now supports it.

Discover: Everyone’s Got a Take. Get Free $25 to Actually Trade Yours

Clarity ACT: The Ethics Provisions Deadlock

The substantive obstacle to passage is not consumer protection language, it is the ethics provisions Senate Republicans introduced in May 2026.

Those provisions would bar the president and other federal officials from issuing or sponsoring digital assets while in office, language explicitly aimed at curtailing President Trump’s crypto activity after disclosures showed he generated over $1.2 billion from crypto ventures in 2025 alone.

Democrats have criticized the proposal on three grounds: the restrictions expire in 2029, enforcement rests solely with the Justice Department, and the language does not extend to officials’ children.

That gap between what Republicans offered and what Democrats consider minimally credible enforcement is where negotiations have stalled. Sens. Angela Alsobrooks and Thom Tillis appeared to reach a bipartisan agreement late last month, but whether that deal commands sufficient support from both industries remains unresolved, per The Hill’s reporting.

Meanwhile, the broader crypto market on July 30 was digesting the FOMC decision and ETF flow data, with Bitcoin largely shrugging off the political noise around Senate scheduling, a pattern that held into the following session, where Bitcoin price continued ignoring the political stalemate even as the legislative calendar compressed.

Discover: Get Paid to Be Right, $25 to Start on Kalshi

The post Bessent Invokes Satoshi to Force Senate Vote on Crypto Clarity Act appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link