Bitget has secured registration in Argentina as a Virtual Asset Service Provider, adding another regulated market to its Latin American footprint as crypto adoption in the country approaches 20% of the population.

According to a press release shared with crypto.news, Bitget has been added to Argentina’s Virtual Asset Service Provider registry maintained by the National Securities Commission, known locally as the CNV. 

The registration allows the exchange to operate within the country’s existing framework for crypto service providers while complying with oversight requirements tied to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing rules.

As part of the registration, Bitget will be subject to reporting and compliance obligations before Argentina’s Financial Information Unit and other relevant authorities. The approval comes as policymakers across Latin America continue building formal rules for digital asset businesses operating in their jurisdictions.

Argentina has emerged as one of the region’s busiest crypto markets, with company data indicating that nearly 20% of the population uses digital assets and more than 15,000 businesses accept crypto payments. Growing participation has turned the country into a key destination for exchanges seeking expansion opportunities across Latin America.

“Regulatory frameworks for digital assets continue developing across Latin America, making compliance and registration increasingly important for platforms operating in the region,” said Gracy Chen, CEO of Bitget. 

“Argentina represents an important market within Latin America’s broader digital asset landscape, and Bitget remains focused on supporting sustainable growth by aligning with local regulatory requirements.”

Argentina adds to Bitget’s regional expansion

Coming shortly after regulatory progress in Mexico, the Argentina registration extends Bitget’s presence in markets where crypto adoption and regulatory development are advancing at the same time.

Recent months have also seen the company deepen its focus on products that connect digital assets with traditional finance. Earlier in June, Bitget enabled 15 tokenized stocks and exchange-traded funds, including Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, Microsoft and Amazon-linked assets, to be used as collateral for USDT-margined futures trading through its Unified Trading Account system.

At the time, Chen said users were looking for more ways to put tokenized assets to work across different trading activities as demand for blockchain-based financial products continued to grow.

A separate announcement from Bitget Wallet on June 9 expanded the company’s tokenized asset infrastructure further. The wallet introduced support for direct trading of tokenized real-world assets through its DEX Aggregator API, allowing partner platforms to route trades from cryptocurrencies into tokenized stocks without requiring separate trading systems.

According to Bitget Wallet, the upgrade introduced an RFQ-based routing model designed to secure liquidity before transactions reach the blockchain. Initial integrations included Ondo Finance and xStocks, two of the largest participants in the tokenized asset sector.

Bitget Wallet also reported that its ecosystem now offers access to more than 300 tokenized products spanning equities, commodities, precious metals and other financial instruments. Company figures further show that Bitget’s tokenized equity products have generated more than $30 billion in trading volume since 2025.

XRP traded near $1.15 on June 12 after a volume-backed rebound from the $1.10 area, but traders still watched whether the move could break the wider downtrend.

XRP price rebounds from $1.10

XRP traded at $1.15, up nearly 3% over 24 hours, according to crypto.news market data. The token recorded about $1.68 billion in daily trading volume, while market capitalization stood near $71.24 billion.

The 24-hour trading range stayed between $1.10 and $1.15. That shows buyers defended the lower end of the range and pushed price back toward short-term resistance.

The rebound followed a weak period for XRP. The token remained down 21.48% over 30 days and 48.73% over the past year, showing that the latest move has not erased the broader decline.

XRP still ranks sixth by market value. Its fully diluted valuation stood near $114.79 billion, with about 62.05 billion tokens in circulation from a maximum supply of 100 billion.

Volume-backed move tests resistance

XRP rose from about $1.1080 to $1.1442 during the earlier 24-hour session, gaining more than 3%. The strongest move came when buyers pushed through resistance near $1.1220.

Volume surged to about 120.2 million XRP during the June 11 17:00 UTC session. That was more than 160% above average and helped confirm the short-term breakout.

The move was notable because recent XRP rebounds had faded quickly. This time, buyers kept bidding into the close and pushed price above $1.14.

The next test sits around $1.20 to $1.25. Every major XRP recovery this year has struggled before that zone, so a clean break above it would be needed to improve the larger structure.

Sentiment stays weak despite rebound

Santiment said XRP’s weighted sentiment has fallen to its lowest level since October 2025. The metric tracks social volume and the ratio of positive to negative commentary.

“XRP’s sentiment at 8-month lows, but this level of FUD tends to spark bull rallies,” said Santiment.

That signal does not confirm a price rally. It shows that crowd interest has weakened while negative commentary has increased, which can sometimes appear near rebound zones.

Santiment also noted that XRP has seen strong rebounds in the past when traders became disinterested. That makes sentiment a useful secondary signal, but not a full trading signal on its own.

ChartNerd also pointed to XRP returning to the lower regression band of the Gaussian Channel on the two-week timeframe near $1.04. The analyst described that zone as a macro opportunity area based on prior cycles.

“One of our XRP signals just fired,” said ChartNerd.

XRP ETF flows and technical levels matter

According to SoSoValue data, XRP spot ETFs recorded zero outflows on June 11, while Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs saw redemptions. XRP ETF net assets were reported near $984.77 million, close to the $1 billion mark.

That matters because steady ETF demand can support price during weak market conditions. It does not guarantee a breakout, but it can reduce the pressure that comes from spot selling.

Technically, XRP is trapped between a short-term rebound and a longer-term downtrend. Price has reclaimed $1.14, but it still trades below the larger descending trendline that has guided the market since early 2026.

Immediate support sits near $1.10. A loss of that area could expose $1.04, where analysts are watching the lower regression band and recent support.

On the upside, XRP needs to clear $1.15 first, then build momentum toward $1.20. A daily close above $1.20 would shift focus to $1.25, where earlier recoveries have failed.

MXNB launch adds XRPL context

Ripple and Bitso expanded their partnership by bringing the MXN-backed stablecoin MXNB to the XRP Ledger. The stablecoin will also integrate with Ripple’s Payments on Decentralized Exchange infrastructure.

The setup is designed to support enterprise settlement between the United States and Mexico. Ripple’s RLUSD and Bitso’s MXNB are expected to provide on-chain dollar and peso liquidity for payment flows.

The launch adds another institutional use case for XRPL. Still, XRP price must confirm strength through the chart, because network growth does not always lead to immediate token demand.

As previously reported by crypto.news, the XRPL 3.2.0 upgrade is also expected on June 15. The upgrade will rename the core software from “rippled” to “xrpld” and may reduce server memory use by around 40%.

Several major crypto trading and wallet platforms have canceled their tokenized SpaceX IPO campaigns after SpaceX began trading publicly on the Nasdaq. Bybit, Binance, Bitget Wallet and MEXC all pointed to problems in securing underlying allocations, leaving subscribers without the expected access and triggering refunds in some cases.

SpaceX’s IPO, reported as more than four times oversubscribed, raised $75 billion and valued the company at more than $2 trillion on its first day. Shares opened at $150, rose from the $135 IPO price, and closed at $161.11 on Friday.

Key takeaways

• Bybit, Binance, Bitget Wallet and MEXC canceled their tokenized SpaceX IPO offerings once allocations could not be fulfilled.
• Multiple platforms blamed xStocks’ inability to deliver the underlying assets needed to distribute SpaceX tokenized IPO allocations.
• Binance’s campaign had reportedly attracted more than $557 million in USDC deposits before being halted.
• Bitget Wallet and MEXC stated they would refund affected users.

Tokenized IPO campaigns lose the allocation race

As SpaceX transitioned from private markets to public trading, crypto platforms offering tokenized access attempted to translate that demand into participation for their users. But once the IPO went live, these campaigns ran into a practical bottleneck: they could not obtain SpaceX allocations through xStocks, the entity involved in distributing the tokenized exposure.

According to Bybit’s announcement, the firm did not receive any SpaceX allocations due to xStocks’ failure to deliver the underlying assets. In that situation, Bybit said subscribed users would not receive SpaceX allocations despite the earlier subscription process.

Bybit says xStocks delivery issues stopped allocations

Bybit was among the earliest platforms to market tokenized IPO participation with its Bybit IPO Express, which included a SpaceX debut. In its cancellation message, Bybit directly tied the outcome to xStocks’ inability to deliver the underlying assets required for the allocation.

Bybit’s statement indicated that because no allocations were received, the campaign could not proceed as advertised. For users, that meant the tokenized IPO access did not materialize in the form of SpaceX allocations tied to the public listing.

Binance’s deposits were not enough to proceed

Binance also reported that it could not move forward with its tokenized SpaceX IPO campaign after citing circumstances outside its control. Earlier coverage described the initiative as attracting more than $557 million in USDC deposits, reflecting significant interest from Binance users.

Binance Wallet was also described as relying on xStocks for allocation delivery. With xStocks unable to provide the underlying assets, Binance said it was unable to proceed with the campaign, despite the apparent scale of deposits recorded before the IPO date.

Bitget Wallet and MEXC move to refund users

While some platforms framed their cancellation around delivery constraints, others emphasized remediation. Bitget Wallet and MEXC both stated that they would refund users who were affected after they were unable to secure an allocation of xStocks’ tokenized SPCX exposure.

In an X post, Bitget Wallet chief operating officer Alvin Kan said it was “disappointing that this didn’t work out in the end,” adding that the company was sending refunds. Kan also acknowledged that the episode had shaken trust within the industry, while arguing that the platform would continue and “come out of this stronger.”

MEXC similarly indicated that refunds were the next step, aligning with the broader pattern of tokenized IPO campaigns encountering execution risk when upstream allocation mechanics fail.

What this setback signals for tokenized IPO access

This episode highlights a recurring challenge for tokenized access products: they may package participation in high-demand public events for retail or crypto-native audiences, but they still depend on traditional allocation and settlement flows. When the party responsible for sourcing and distributing the underlying exposure cannot deliver, platforms can only cancel or unwind the offering.

That dependency matters now because the market conditions were unusually favorable for such products. SpaceX’s IPO drew massive interest, and reports said it was more than four times oversubscribed. Yet even with demand concentrated around a single, widely watched listing, crypto platforms were still unable to convert subscriptions into allocations.

For investors and traders, the practical takeaway is that tokenized IPO participation should be viewed as an execution-sensitive service—not only a market product. Users should watch for clarity around allocation guarantees, the identity of the upstream allocation provider, and how refunds are handled when delivery fails.

Going forward, the key question is whether platforms and allocation intermediaries can align incentives and operational readiness ahead of the next major high-profile IPO. Until then, users should expect that tokenized IPO offerings may carry additional counterparty and process risk—especially when demand is at the level seen during SpaceX’s public launch.

The government told Anthropic it had become aware of a method to bypass, or jailbreak, Fable 5. Anthropic reviewed the technique and said what it saw was narrow, not a universal jailbreak, and involved identifying a small number of previously known, minor vulnerabilities. It said other publicly available models, including OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, can find the same vulnerabilities without any bypass at all.

The company said the government has so far provided only verbal evidence of a potential narrow jailbreak, which it described as essentially asking the model to read a codebase and fix software flaws, a task defenders use every day.

It said applying this standard across the industry “would essentially halt all new model deployments for all frontier model providers.”

Anthropic built its entire brand around safety-first AI development, and it is now publicly disputing a national security directive on the grounds that the government’s evidence does not clear its own stated bar.

The company will share more details about the specific jailbreak within 24 hours.

The crypto market is now pricing the shutdown as a negative for the IPO case, and the Anthropic perp’s drop from its post-launch highs reflects that. The first question for the company’s public listing ambitions is whether the government’s order gets reversed, narrowed, or extended to other model classes once Anthropic publishes its technical rebuttal.

Many are assumed to belong to Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto and other owners who lost their keys, which means they can never be moved to safety. Another 5 million or so are exposed through address reuse, according to Project11, a research group tracking the issue, though most of those are thought to be active holdings in exchange wallets.

Swapping in quantum-resistant signatures is the easy part, but the fight is over the coins nobody moves. One camp argues for a hard deadline, after which the signature schemes Bitcoin uses today, ECDSA and Schnorr, stop being accepted and any unmigrated coins become unspendable. Leaving them live, this side says, hands a future attacker, potentially a sanctioned state like North Korea, a stash of bitcoin large enough to crash the price and taint the network’s legitimacy.

The other camp calls that confiscation, a violation of the absolute property rights Bitcoin was built on, and warns it sets a precedent for freezing coins under government pressure later.

Between them sit the several proposals CoinDesk has tracked over the past two months.

Hourglass would cap how many vulnerable coins can be spent per block to prevent a supply flood. BIP-361, from developer Jameson Lopp and others, would let migrated holders prove ownership after the cutoff with a quantum-resistant proof that exposes no key. PACTs, from Paradigm’s Dan Robinson, would let owners timestamp a private claim now and move funds later without revealing anything today.

CoreWeave and Nebius have secured places in the Nasdaq 100 after Nasdaq announced that both companies will be added to the index before trading begins on June 22.

According to Nasdaq’s quarterly index rebalance announcement, CoreWeave and Nebius will join the Nasdaq 100 alongside Astera Labs, Rocket Lab, and Teradyne.

Investors welcomed the news, sending CoreWeave shares up about 7.3% to roughly $102 and lifting Nebius shares about 6.3% to around $233 in Friday trading.

Hong Kong has priced its largest-ever digital bond sale at around HK$12 billion (approximately $1.5 billion), extending the city’s push to bring traditional fixed-income markets onto blockchain-based infrastructure.

The Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation (HKMC) said on June 11 that it had completed pricing for the inaugural public digital bond issuance under its $30 billion Medium Term Note Programme. Bookbuilding and pricing were finalized in Hong Kong on June 10 following investor roadshows and pre-marketing activities.

According to HKMC, the transaction consists of three tranches, including a HK$6 billion two-year bond, a HK$2.5 billion five-year bond, and a three-year bond worth RMB3 billion.

Investor demand reached about HK$24 billion equivalent at its peak, with orders coming from more than 100 accounts. HKMC said participants included local investors, Southbound Bond Connect investors, and international institutions such as central banks, multilateral development banks, insurers, private banks, commercial banks, and asset managers.

The issuance surpasses previous tokenized bond transactions completed in Hong Kong and, according to HKMC, is the largest digital bond sale completed globally so far.

Hong Kong expands tokenized bond market

Built using distributed ledger technology, the bonds were issued natively on a blockchain platform operated by Hong Kong’s Central Moneymarkets Unit, which also handled settlement and custody functions.

Beyond the size of the deal, HKMC said the issuance reduced the settlement cycle from five business days to three. Investors were able to access the bonds through existing Central Moneymarkets Unit infrastructure and linked accounts with Euroclear and Clearstream.

Among the three tranches, the five-year Hong Kong dollar bond establishes a new maturity record for a digital bond denominated in Hong Kong dollars, according to the corporation.

Lee Wai Man, deputy chief executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and executive director of HKMC, said the transaction demonstrates support for the Hong Kong government’s strategy of strengthening the city’s role as an international fixed-income and financial center. Lee said the issuance could encourage more issuers, investors, intermediaries, and market participants to adopt tokenized fixed-income products.

HKMC chief executive Raymond Li said strong investor participation during the marketing process helped the institution complete pricing successfully and showed rising interest from both underwriters and investors entering the digital bond market.

Recent developments indicate that Hong Kong is continuing to build infrastructure around tokenized debt markets. Earlier this month, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority announced the formation of a tokenized bond expert group that includes institutions such as JPMorgan Securities, HSBC, Standard Chartered, UBS, Ant Digital, and HashKey Group.

According to the HKMA, the group is examining market practices, regulatory considerations, and infrastructure requirements that could support wider use of tokenized bonds across the financial system.

Government-backed issuance has already played a key role in Hong Kong’s tokenization efforts. Authorities issued HK$800 million of tokenized green bonds in 2023, followed by a HK$6 billion multi-currency digital green bond sale in 2024 that Hong Kong officials previously described as the largest digital bond issuance at the time.

The latest HKMC transaction also arrives one day after South Korea’s KB Kookmin Bank announced a $100 million blockchain-based digital bond sale in Hong Kong. Kookmin Bank said blockchain technology was used throughout issuance, registration, trading, and settlement, reducing settlement times from five business days to three and highlighting growing institutional use of tokenized debt instruments across Asia.

Strategy also sold about 800,000 shares for $128 million through its at-the-market program in the same week. If the bitcoin sale did not matter, traders were left asking why it needed to happen at all.

One possible answer is the S&P 500.

Strategy met the technical requirements for index inclusion in September 2025 but was passed over. Some market commentators have argued that the company’s refusal to sell bitcoin could make it look more like an investment vehicle than a treasury company, which would hurt its chances. Selling a small amount of bitcoin may help Strategy show it can use BTC as a corporate treasury asset, not just hold it forever.

The market reaction was real, however, as bitcoin was already trading into weak risk appetite. Iran tensions had pushed oil higher and revived higher-for-longer rate worries. Tech stocks were under pressure. Bitcoin traded more like a high-beta Nasdaq proxy than an independent store-of-value trade.

But the rebound came from the same macro channel.

President Donald Trump said the U.S. had effectively ended the war with Iran, while officials pointed to progress toward a signed accord. Brent crude fell toward $85. Stocks rallied. SpaceX listed on Nasdaq on Friday and closed at $161, up 19% from its $135 offer price, giving risk traders another reason to step back in.

Solana price has rebounded more than 10% from its June low after a 36% correction from its May peak, with a giant falling wedge now putting the January high back on traders’ radar.

According to data from crypto.news, Solana (SOL) price was trading near $67 on June 12 after rebounding more than 10% from its June 6 low around $61.

SOL’s price recovery follows a steep decline that saw the token plunge roughly 36% from its May high near $96 to its recent bottom, as heavy liquidations, whale selling, and a broader cryptocurrency market sell-off weighed on sentiment.

Data from major exchanges showed retail traders entered June with a strong bullish bias, leaving the market vulnerable when SOL broke below the former support zone around $76. The breakdown triggered more than $89 million in long liquidations, accelerating losses as leveraged positions were forced to close.

Large holders added to the pressure by reducing exposure during the decline. At the same time, weakening decentralized application revenues and softer network activity contributed to the selling pressure, according to market observers.

A falling wedge points to a possible recovery path

The daily chart shows Solana is trading within a large falling wedge that has been developing since its January peak near $145. The pattern formed through a series of lower highs and lower lows, with converging trendlines compressing price action over several months.

Technical analysts generally view falling wedges as bullish reversal structures when price begins stabilizing near the lower boundary. Solana recently found support around the $60 to $62 region, where buyers stepped in after the liquidation-driven decline.

While the daily trend remains under pressure, the first major hurdle sits near $76. That level previously acted as support before the June breakdown and now represents a significant resistance area. A successful recovery above that zone would place attention back on the upper boundary of the wedge and eventually the January high.

Momentum indicators show early signs of improvement. The daily RSI has recovered from oversold territory, while downside momentum on the MACD has started to ease after weeks of persistent selling.

Short-term breakout signals emerge near $68

On the four-hour chart, Solana has formed an ascending triangle beneath resistance around $68. The structure developed after the June low as buyers continued defending higher lows while sellers repeatedly capped advances near the same price level.

Liquidation data from CoinGlass adds another layer to the setup. The platform’s weekly liquidation heatmap shows the largest concentration of short-side liquidity sitting around the $68 area, directly above current price levels.

If buyers force a breakout through that resistance, the resulting short liquidations could accelerate upside momentum toward the next liquidity cluster near $70. The measured move from the ascending triangle also projects a target close to $76, aligning with the former support zone that failed earlier this month.

However, not all analysts are convinced the rebound has developed into a full trend reversal. Commenting on the recent price action, MCO Global said on X that Solana is still testing support and has yet to produce a bullish confirmation signal. The analyst noted that the larger decline remains the preferred outlook unless SOL breaks above $72.57.

“Bullish reversal requires a 5-wave advance and a break above $72.57. The chart hasn’t shown that yet. Until it does, this is just support being tested.”

Bitcoin’s recent weakness continues to influence the altcoin market, including SOL, after the largest crypto suffered its sharpest weekly decline since the FTX collapse. Market sentiment also remains tied to U.S. economic data after May nonfarm payrolls increased by 172,000, exceeding expectations of 85,000 and reducing expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts.

For now, Solana’s recovery attempt depends on whether buyers can clear the $68 resistance zone. A breakout could open the door to $70 and potentially $76, while failure at current levels may leave the $60 support area exposed once again.

Anthropic has suspended access to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models after receiving a U.S. government export control directive, citing national security concerns. The company disabled the models for all users immediately to comply with the order, while saying its other offerings—including Opus 4.8—remain available.

In a statement posted Friday, Anthropic said the directive arrived at 5:21 pm ET and instructed it to suspend “all access” to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States. This restriction reportedly includes foreign national Anthropic employees, and the company said it took broad action to ensure compliance.

Key takeaways

• Anthropic suspended access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 immediately after receiving a U.S. government export control directive.
• The order reportedly targets access by foreign nationals, including Anthropic employees who are foreign nationals.
• Other Anthropic models, such as Opus 4.8, are not affected according to the company.
• Anthropic said authorities raised concerns about a potential “jailbreak” method that could bypass safeguards on Fable 5.
• The firm described the government’s evidence as “verbal” and suggested the issue involves a narrow, non-universal jailbreak rather than a broad one.

Export control directive triggers immediate model shutdown

Anthropic’s action follows an abrupt interruption to access for the public. According to the company, it received the directive late Friday and was told to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national. To meet the requirement without exception, Anthropic said it removed access for all users rather than attempting to segment access by nationality.

The company framed the move as a straightforward compliance step: it is “removing access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all users” to comply with the government’s legal directive.

Why Anthropic says the concern is limited

While Anthropic did not provide specific details about the alleged threat, it said it believes the government is concerned about a possible jailbreak technique capable of bypassing safeguards built into Fable 5.

In its statement, Anthropic noted that, to date, the government has provided only verbal evidence of a potential “narrow, non-universal jailbreak.” The company described this as essentially asking the model to read a specific codebase and fix software flaws—an approach it argued is materially different from a “universal jailbreak,” which would broadly undermine protections across scenarios.

Anthropic also pushed back on the severity of the response implied by the order. The firm said it “disagree[s]” that a narrow potential jailbreak should lead to the recall of a commercial model deployed at large scale. It added that applying that standard across the industry would effectively stop new frontier model deployments for all providers.

Recent release raises questions for AI users and operators

Anthropic’s suspension comes only days after it released both Fable 5 and Mythos 5. The releases were notable not just for their capabilities, but for the underlying context around Mythos Preview, which Anthropic previously said had helped uncover thousands of vulnerabilities in critical software.

Earlier coverage around these releases highlighted the scale and intensity of the safety research and testing that can surround frontier model rollouts—particularly when models are capable of complex reasoning and code-related tasks. In that setting, the sudden reversal underscores how quickly external compliance actions can override product continuity.

Anthropic also indicated that it believes the government order is the result of a misunderstanding and that it is working to restore access for users “as soon as possible.” For model users—especially those outside the U.S.—the key near-term issue is whether access can return in a way that matches the directive’s scope without requiring a full shutdown.

What to watch next

Until Anthropic receives clearer guidance or the government narrows the directive’s implementation, users should expect continuing uncertainty around when Fable 5 and Mythos 5 will be available again and under what geographic or eligibility conditions. Investors and builders in the AI sector will likely watch closely for how regulators distinguish between narrow jailbreak techniques and broader safeguard failures—and whether the incident prompts tighter deployment controls across the industry.