Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Evaluating Top Tech Plays for Investors in 2026

Published

on

For its Moon lander bid, SpaceX put forward its reuseable Starship spacecraft

NEW YORK — As artificial intelligence and space innovation drive market enthusiasm, investors are weighing shares of NVIDIA Corp. against the newly public Space Exploration Technologies Corp., known as SpaceX, in a high-stakes comparison of established semiconductor leadership versus ambitious aerospace growth.

NVIDIA, the dominant player in AI chips, continues to deliver strong results amid surging demand for data center infrastructure. SpaceX, fresh from its record-breaking initial public offering, commands attention with its Starlink satellite network and reusable rocket technology, though its valuation reflects lofty expectations.

The choice between the two reflects differing risk-reward profiles in a market captivated by transformative technologies. NVIDIA offers proven execution and consistent revenue growth, while SpaceX bets on exponential expansion in the emerging space economy.

NVIDIA reported robust performance through mid-2026, with analysts maintaining strong buy ratings and price targets suggesting significant upside. The company’s forward price-to-earnings multiple remains attractive relative to its growth trajectory, supported by AI capital expenditures from major technology firms.

Advertisement

SpaceX, trading under ticker SPCX, debuted in June 2026 at $135 per share, raising approximately $75 billion in the largest IPO on record. Shares climbed in initial trading, pushing the market capitalization above $2 trillion amid excitement over its multi-faceted business.

The company reported $18.7 billion in revenue for 2025, with Starlink as the primary growth driver. Its IPO prospectus highlighted heavy investments in Starship development and emerging AI infrastructure, contributing to a net loss despite top-line expansion.

Analysts offer contrasting views. Some see SpaceX potentially surpassing NVIDIA’s market value over time due to its diversified revenue streams and long-term vision. CNBC’s Jim Cramer has suggested the company could reach a $6 trillion valuation, while hedge fund manager Ron Baron has projected even higher figures.

Others urge caution. CFRA analyst Keith Snyder initiated coverage with a sell rating and $115 price target, citing a premium valuation that leaves limited room for execution shortfalls.

Advertisement

NVIDIA’s business benefits from secular tailwinds in AI. The company supplies critical graphics processing units for training and inference workloads, with data center revenue forming the bulk of its results. Multiple analysts project continued strong growth, with some forecasting the stock could approach $357 by the end of 2026 under optimistic scenarios.

SpaceX’s appeal lies in its leadership in commercial spaceflight and satellite communications. Starlink has scaled rapidly, serving millions of subscribers and generating recurring revenue. Government contracts and potential deep-space missions add further optionality, though capital intensity remains high.

Valuation metrics highlight the divergence. NVIDIA trades at multiples that reflect its earnings power and market position. SpaceX’s post-IPO pricing implies aggressive assumptions about future revenue scaling to justify its enterprise value.

Risk factors differ markedly. NVIDIA faces competition in AI chips and potential cyclicality in semiconductor demand, though its technological moat provides resilience. SpaceX contends with technical and regulatory challenges in rocket development, alongside execution risks in scaling Starlink globally.

Advertisement

Broader market context favors companies with clear paths to profitability and cash flow generation. NVIDIA has demonstrated both, while SpaceX’s profitability is concentrated in Starlink amid substantial spending on future initiatives.

Investor sentiment remains buoyant for both amid the technology rally. SpaceX’s low public float has contributed to post-IPO volatility, while NVIDIA benefits from broad institutional ownership and index inclusion.

For those prioritizing near-term fundamentals, NVIDIA presents a more established track record. Long-term believers in the space economy may favor SpaceX despite higher uncertainty. Diversification across both could balance exposure to AI infrastructure and orbital services.

The coming quarters will test these narratives. NVIDIA’s earnings trajectory depends on sustained AI investment, while SpaceX must deliver on launch cadence and subscriber growth to support its premium valuation.

Advertisement

Neither stock suits conservative portfolios given sector volatility. Thorough due diligence, including review of financial filings and analyst reports, remains essential before committing capital.

Market participants continue monitoring macroeconomic factors, including interest rates and capital spending trends, which influence both companies’ outlooks. Technology leadership in their respective domains positions them for potential long-term success, subject to execution and competitive dynamics.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Mint Renewables flags battery energy storage in Kojonup

Published

on

Mint Renewables flags battery energy storage in Kojonup

Victoria-based Mint Renewables has lodged a proposal in Western Australia, over a battery storage project in the Shire of Kojonup.

Continue Reading

Business

Diodes Incorporated: My Best Pick For The Semis Rally

Published

on

Diodes Incorporated: My Best Pick For The Semis Rally

Diodes Incorporated: My Best Pick For The Semis Rally

Continue Reading

Business

BHP cops another cost blowout on Canadian potash project

Published

on

BHP cops another cost blowout on Canadian potash project

The cost of BHP’s flagship potash project in Canada has blown out by another US$2 billion on the back of a two-year building delay.

Continue Reading

Business

Yes Bank shares jump 16% in 5 days, hit fresh 52-week high. What lies ahead?

Published

on

Yes Bank shares jump 16% in 5 days, hit fresh 52-week high. What lies ahead?
The shares of Yes Bank jumped around 3% to hit a fresh 52-week high on Thursday, as the stock extended a 16% rally over five straight sessions.

The sharp surge in Yes Bank shares over the past five days has added more than Rs 8,662 crore to the company’s market capitalisation, bringing it to nearly Rs 80,912 crore on Thursday. The stock hit a 52-week high of Rs 25.78 apiece today, skyrocketing 50% in less than three months after hitting a 52-week low of Rs 17.20 apiece in March this year.

The sharp rally in Yes Bank’s share price began after the lender announced a strategic partnership with Northern Arc Capital aimed at expanding access to credit, scaling digital lending and offering debt investment opportunities to customers. The stock has gained 15% in one week, 17% in one month and 19% in 2026 so far. In the longer term, the stock gained 56% in three years and 85% in five years.

Also read: Yes Bank partners with Northern Arc to extend lending offerings

Advertisement

Technical view on Yes Bank

Analysts hold a ‘Sell’ call on the shares of Yes Bank, according to LSEG data on the mean recommendation of 11 analysts. The stock currently has a P/E ratio of around 23x and is trading as one of the top gainers on the Nifty Bank index today.


Yes Bank’s technical setup has improved, but the risk-reward is no longer as comfortable as it was near the lower end of the range, said Harshal Dasani, Business Head, INVasset PMS. “The stock has seen a sharp short-term move, supported by stronger volumes and a breakout above the earlier supply zone around Rs 24. That confirms better momentum and suggests that the market is no longer treating the stock as purely range-bound. The RSI moving into the stronger zone also shows that buyers have control for now,” he said.
The issue is that the stock is already approaching an important resistance band around Rs 26, where supply can re-emerge, according to the analyst, who added that a clean close above this zone would strengthen the breakout structure and may extend the recovery, but failure to sustain there could lead to consolidation or profit-taking. “The Rs 23 to Rs 24 band is now the key support area. As long as the stock holds above it, the short-term structure remains constructive. A breach of that band would weaken the move and suggest that this was more of a momentum-led bounce than a durable trend reversal. The honest view is balanced: the chart has improved, but the next leg needs confirmation, not assumption,” he said.Also read: Vedanta Aluminium vs Power vs Oil & Gas vs Iron & Steel; which stock should you buy?

Yes Bank Q4 snapshot

Yes Bank reported a 45% year-on-year (YoY) rise in net profit to Rs 1,068 crore for the January-March quarter of FY26. Its net interest income during the quarter under review grew 16% YoY to Rs 2,638 crore.

Net interest margin (NIM) gained 20 bps to 2.7% while asset quality improved. Gross non-performing assets (NPA) ratio declined 30 bps YoY to 1.3%, while net NPA ratio declined 10 bps to 0.2%.

Advertisement

Also read: Yes Bank Q4 Results

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Intercontinental Exchange: Scale And Market Leadership But With Mortgage Headwinds

Published

on

Dow Jones And U.S. Stock Market Outlook - Wall Street Uncertain Amid U.S.-Iran (Potential) Talks

Intercontinental Exchange: Scale And Market Leadership But With Mortgage Headwinds

Continue Reading

Business

Claude AI Down Now? Claude AI Experiences Service Disruptions as Users Report Widespread Outages

Published

on

Apple iPhone 16e

SAN FRANCISCO — Anthropic’s popular Claude AI chatbot faced intermittent service disruptions affecting users worldwide, with reports of elevated error rates across its platforms prompting questions about infrastructure capacity amid surging demand.

Users attempting to access Claude via claude.ai and associated services encountered issues ranging from slow responses to complete unavailability. Downdetector and social media platforms saw spikes in complaints, with many noting problems specifically with models like Claude Opus.

Anthropic’s official status page confirmed investigations into elevated errors, marking one of several incidents reported in recent weeks. The company has attributed such disruptions to demand outpacing current infrastructure capabilities as adoption of the AI assistant grows rapidly.

The latest reported problems affected core services including the web interface, API and Claude Code. While some outages resolved relatively quickly after fixes were deployed, the frequency has raised concerns among developers and enterprise users reliant on the platform for daily workflows.

Advertisement

Anthropic has not issued a detailed public statement on the most recent incidents beyond status updates. Previous outages have been resolved within hours, with the company monitoring systems and implementing adjustments.

The disruptions come as Claude continues gaining traction as a competitor to other leading AI models. Anthropic has positioned the chatbot as a helpful and reliable assistant, but repeated service interruptions have tested user patience and highlighted challenges in scaling large language models.

Industry analysts point to the “success tax” faced by popular AI services, where rapid user growth strains backend systems. Similar issues have affected other providers during peak demand periods.

For individual users, outages mean temporary inability to generate text, analyze data or engage in conversations with the AI. Enterprise customers with API integrations have reported workflow interruptions, particularly in coding and content creation tasks.

Advertisement

Anthropic has expanded capacity in recent months but faces ongoing pressure to match demand. The company has invested heavily in compute resources while emphasizing responsible development practices.

Social media reactions reflected a mix of frustration and understanding. Users shared screenshots of error messages, with hashtags like #ClaudeDown trending during peak disruption times. Some expressed sympathy for the engineering challenges involved.

The outages have renewed discussions about AI reliability and the need for redundancy in critical applications. Businesses increasingly depend on these tools for productivity, making consistent uptime essential.

Anthropic’s status page remains the primary source for real-time updates. Users experiencing problems are advised to check there before reporting issues through other channels.

Advertisement

This is not the first time Claude has encountered widespread problems. Earlier incidents in June followed patterns of elevated errors during high-traffic periods, often resolving after targeted fixes.

Experts suggest that as AI adoption accelerates, service providers will need robust failover systems and transparent communication to maintain trust. Anthropic has committed to improving stability while continuing model development.

For now, affected users may need to rely on alternative AI tools or wait for resolution. The company typically provides follow-up reports once normal operations resume.

The situation underscores broader challenges in the AI industry as it balances innovation with operational reliability. Companies like Anthropic are navigating unprecedented demand while upholding safety and performance standards.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Extended summer may lift AC sales, but growth likely to fall short of expectations: Praveen Sahay

Published

on

Extended summer may lift AC sales, but growth likely to fall short of expectations: Praveen Sahay
An extended summer and the possibility of hotter-than-usual weather due to El Niño are expected to provide a boost to India’s room air conditioner (RAC) market. However, the industry is unlikely to witness the 20-25% growth that many had anticipated at the beginning of the season, primarily because dealers have remained conservative in stocking inventory.

According to Praveen Sahay, PL Capital while consumer demand at the secondary level has been encouraging since mid-April, weak primary sales have prevented the industry from fully capitalising on the seasonal opportunity.

Secondary Demand Strong, But Primary Sales Lag
Sahay noted that channel checks indicate healthy off-take at the retail level throughout May, but manufacturers have not seen a proportional increase in shipments to dealers.”On the RAC, we did a channel check recently, and definitely the secondary demand has been very good post-15th April throughout May. That led to good traction at the secondary level. However, we also got to know that the primary sales have not been as expected, even though the summer is continuing. Expectations were for nearly 20-25% growth, but that is not happening at the primary level because inventory in the channel was lower. Dealers were not very enthusiastic about the extended or harsh summer in terms of building inventories.”

He added that the industry’s volume growth has remained below expectations.
“Nearly around 15% growth is what we had envisaged based on our channel checks as well as data published by secondary sources, so that is below expectations.”
El Niño Could Extend the Seasonal Boost
Although the first quarter may not deliver the anticipated growth, Sahay believes the extended summer could benefit the industry during the traditionally weaker second quarter.

He expects RAC sales to recover to around 58 lakh units in the first quarter, compared with approximately 51 lakh units last year, but does not foresee volumes exceeding that level.

Advertisement

“Coming to the El Niño impact, it may extend the summer, especially into July. Q2 is usually a lean quarter for RACs. In good years, the industry sold nearly 17-18 lakh RAC units in the secondary market, while last year it was around 15 lakh. We expect that, with the El Niño impact, sales may reach 18 lakh. Altogether, Q1 and Q2 growth would be nearly around 17% plus, not the 20-25% that was expected.”

He also pointed out that performance differs significantly across brands.

“Brand-to-brand, these numbers are varying. Some companies are very aggressive and are doing very well in terms of volumes, and one of them is Voltas right now.”

Partial Price Hikes Could Squeeze Margins
While inflationary pressures and rising commodity costs prompted manufacturers to announce price increases, Sahay said only part of those hikes has been implemented because of intense competition and soft consumer sentiment.

Advertisement

“The first price hike was taken in January to adjust to the BE norms, and all brands absorbed it because the GST reduction gave them some leeway. Ultimately, consumers did not face any price hike. In April, the announced price hike was around 10% to 11%. In our channel checks, we found that only 5% to 6% has been implemented so far. Some discounting and rollbacks have also happened.”

He believes companies have struggled to fully pass on higher costs.

“Competitive intensity has increased. Maybe consumer demand is also getting impacted because of inflation. Those are the reasons why the entire price hike has not been taken, and that will definitely lead to some margin pressure for all the players because they are not able to pass on the entire commodity cost increase.”

Dealers Playing It Safe
The industry’s biggest challenge this year has been the cautious approach adopted by dealers despite favourable weather conditions.

Advertisement

Sahay said dealer inventory levels remain significantly lower than in previous years.

“Our channel checks show that secondary demand has been good, but primary demand is still lower. Earlier, dealers were carrying inventories of more than 30 days. Right now, what we get to know is that inventory is nearly 10 days lower, at around 20 days. That has led to softness in primary sales. Expectations were for 20-25% growth, looking at the harsh summer, extended summer and El Niño impact, but dealers were quite cautious in building inventory. That has led to softer demand. Nearly around 15% growth is what we are estimating so far.”

Q1 Growth Seen at Around 15%, Margins Remain Under Pressure
Looking ahead, Sahay expects the industry to deliver around 15% volume growth in the first quarter of FY27, while profitability is likely to remain under pressure because companies have not been able to fully recover rising input costs through pricing.

“Earlier expectations for volume growth were higher. So far, for Q1, we are estimating around 15% growth. On the margin front, as I highlighted earlier, commodity inflation required a price hike of around 10-11%. The players announced it, but the absorption has been only 5% to 6% so far. There is a gap of nearly 5%, which will definitely impact the margin profile for all the players.”

Advertisement

While the extended summer could provide additional support in the coming months, the industry’s overall performance will largely depend on whether dealers become more confident in rebuilding inventories and whether manufacturers can protect margins amid competitive pricing.

Continue Reading

Business

At Close of Business podcast June 18 2026

Published

on

At Close of Business podcast June 18 2026

Nadia Budihardjo and Ella Loneragan discuss the state government’s aim to boost the connection between VET and university pathways in higher education.

Continue Reading

Business

Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund Q1 2026 Commentary

Published

on

Northern Multi-Manager Global Real Estate Fund Q1 2026 Commentary

Northern Trust Asset Management is a global investment manager that helps investors navigate changing market environments in efforts to realize their long-term objectives.

Entrusted with $1.2 trillion in assets under management as of March 31, 2024, we understand that investing ultimately serves a greater purpose and believe investors should be compensated for the risks they take — in all market environments and any investment strategy. That’s why we combine robust capital markets research, expert portfolio construction and comprehensive risk management in an effort to craft innovative and efficient solutions that seek to deliver targeted investment outcomes.

As engaged contributors to our communities, we consider it a great privilege to serve our investors and our communities with integrity, respect and transparency.

Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Northern Trust Asset Management, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use Northern Trust Asset Management’s official channels.

Continue Reading

Business

People starting new jobs at lowest level in five years

Published

on

People starting new jobs at lowest level in five years

The Office for National Statistics says some areas of the jobs market are weakening, as vacancies continue to fall.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025