Key Takeaways

• Ethereum has declined 23.5% in the past month, currently trading near $1,557
• Large ETH holder groups are experiencing unrealized losses for the first time in five years
• Ethereum ETF products are approaching their seventh consecutive week of capital withdrawals
• A protocol developer highlights potential funding shortfall of approximately $30M annually in coming months
• Critical price levels: support zone at $1,500–$1,510; overhead resistance begins at $1,710

---

The world’s second-largest cryptocurrency has faced relentless downward pressure during June, sliding from levels above $2,000 to approximately $1,557 by June 26. This represents a monthly decline of 23.5%, with an additional 6.7% drawdown occurring over the past seven days alone.

In a symbolic shift, Tether’s total market capitalization has now surpassed Ethereum’s for the first time in history — $186.06 billion compared to $185.66 billion — underscoring ETH’s recent underperformance in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Market analyst Ted Pillows commented via social media that Ethereum “tapped the lows again” and observed that “momentum is still weak due to broader market correction.” He suggested that if ETH can successfully reclaim the $1,750 threshold, a potential relief bounce could materialize in the following month.

Technical analysis of the daily timeframe reveals that ETH violated an ascending trendline established in February. Following this breakdown, the asset experienced rapid declines through the $1,900, $1,800, and ultimately into the $1,550 region.

Major Holder Groups Recording Rare Loss Scenario

Data from CryptoQuant indicates that all significant Ethereum whale categories — including addresses controlling more than 100,000 ETH — are currently experiencing unrealized losses. This phenomenon has occurred only once previously, during 2019, which ultimately marked a long-term price floor for the cryptocurrency.

Historically, capitulation among large holders has coincided with market bottoms rather than signaling further deterioration. While smaller whale categories have periodically entered loss territory, the participation of the largest stakeholders in this condition represents an exceptional occurrence.

The Estimated Leverage Ratio (ELR) metric has simultaneously contracted from 1.11 to 0.85 throughout the past three weeks. This movement indicates substantial closure or liquidation of leveraged trading positions, potentially alleviating additional downside risk.

Exchange-Traded Fund Withdrawals and Development Financing Concerns

Ethereum spot ETF products are tracking toward seven straight weeks of net capital outflows, with the current period positioned to register the most significant withdrawals since January, based on SoSoValue analytics.

Trent Van Epps, Protocol Guild coordinator who recently departed the Ethereum Foundation following a five-year tenure, has issued a cautionary statement regarding core development financing challenges. He calculates that Ethereum’s essential development operations require approximately $30 million annually, an amount the Ethereum Foundation’s reserves may struggle to consistently provide.

Van Epps noted that Protocol Guild has allocated nearly $40 million to developers across four years, but emphasized this remains insufficient. He anticipates new institutional participants will need to emerge within the coming months to address the gap.

Primary technical levels to monitor: downside support positioned at $1,510 and the psychologically significant $1,500 level; upside resistance located at $1,710 and $1,774. The MACD indicator has returned to negative territory, with the signal line currently registering -78.35.

Kalshi has secured World Cup branding exposure through a strategic partnership with ADI Predictstreet, FIFA’s official prediction market partner for the 2026 tournament.

According to Kalshi, the agreement will place the company’s branding alongside ADI Predictstreet across stadium, television, and digital coverage beginning with the FIFA World Cup knockout stage. Although Kalshi is not an official FIFA partner, the arrangement gives the prediction market operator visibility at the tournament while ADI Predictstreet retains its official designation.

The companies said the relationship extends beyond tournament marketing. Kalshi will support the continued expansion of markets available on ADI Predictstreet’s platform as the partnership develops after the World Cup.

Why is Kalshi increasing its presence in sports?

The World Cup agreement adds to a series of football-focused partnerships announced by Kalshi in recent months. According to the company, it has also partnered with the Argentine Football Association, the Croatian Football Federation, Luka Modric, and Men in Blazers as it increases its presence around major sporting events.

At the same time, trading activity on the platform has continued to accelerate. Kalshi said daily trading volume surpassed $1 billion last week during heightened World Cup engagement across prediction market platforms.

Bank of America estimated that Kalshi accounts for roughly 89% of measured U.S. prediction market volume, placing it well ahead of other regulated competitors.

Commenting on the partnership, ADI Predictstreet Chief Executive Dimitrios Psarrakis said combining Kalshi’s market reach with ADI Chain’s infrastructure would introduce regulated prediction markets to more users worldwide.

Kalshi Chief Executive Tarek Mansour described the FIFA World Cup as an opportunity to increase awareness of the platform while encouraging more fan participation through prediction markets.

According to FIFA, ADI Predictstreet became the governing body’s first official prediction market partner in April before launching its Gibraltar-licensed platform ahead of the tournament. The service currently focuses on football-related markets and plans to expand into news, technology, entertainment, culture, and other real-world events.

The expanded 48-team FIFA World Cup features 104 matches across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, creating one of the largest global audiences for sports-related prediction products.

What else is shaping Kalshi’s expansion?

The World Cup partnership comes as Kalshi continues expanding both commercially and legally.

Earlier this week, the company filed a federal lawsuit challenging Illinois Senate Bill 3019, arguing that the state cannot require separate licenses for federally regulated sports event contracts. In its complaint, Kalshi said the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive authority over its contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act and argued that complying with Illinois’ licensing system would conflict with its obligation to operate a single national market.

Separately, Kalshi has entered discussions to raise fresh capital at a valuation of about $40 billion, according to reports. If completed, the financing would represent an 82% increase from the company’s $22 billion valuation during its $1 billion funding round in May, which included Coatue, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and Morgan Stanley.

The latest developments also coincide with increased attention on the prediction market sector. Earlier this week, U.S. senators urged the CFTC to investigate Polymarket over allegations that it used deceptive advertising to reach American users despite restricting access in the country. The lawmakers also questioned whether the federal regulator has sufficient authority and resources to oversee prediction markets while continuing to argue that federal law preempts state regulation. 

Bitcoin (BTC) dropped below $60,000, a key psychological support, on Thursday as losses in megacap technology stocks weighed on investors’ broader risk appetite, adding pressure to an already fragile crypto market.

BTC/USD vs. Nasdaq and S&P 500 daily performance chart. Source: TradingView

The decline has triggered a classic bearish reversal setup that may push the BTC price under the $54,000 mark in the coming days.

Key takeaways:

• Bitcoin’s break below $60,000 has erased its June gains and activated multiple bearish setups.
• Bitcoin’s rounded top and daily bear flag breakdowns are both projecting a downside target below $54,000.

BTC’s rounded top breakdown signals more pain ahead

The BTC/USD pair fell as much as 4.8% on Thursday, hitting an intraday low near $58,000 and erasing its entire June advance. The pullback also completed what appears to be a rounded top pattern on the four-hour chart.

BTC/USD four-hour chart tracking the rounded top bearish setup. Source: TradingView

In technical analysis, a rounded top forms when buying momentum gradually exhausts, shifting the asset from an uptrend to a downtrend in an inverse-U-shaped structure. The pattern officially resolves when the price breaks below the “neckline” or the structure’s base support.

By measuring the distance from the top of the dome to the neckline and projecting that same distance downward from the breakdown point, analysts calculate a clear target.

For Bitcoin, this measured downside target sits just under the $54,000 level, representing an approximate 8.9% drop from current prices.

On the daily chart, Bitcoin has simultaneously triggered a bear flag breakdown.

BTC/USD daily chart tracking the bear flag breakdown setup. Source: TradingView

This secondary pattern independently projects an identical move toward the $54,000 zone, adding substantial weight to the bearish case.

Bitcoin MVRV bands increase $54,000 target odds

Bitcoin’s on-chain price bands also point to the same downside area highlighted by the rounded-top and bear-flag setups.

Glassnode’s MVRV pricing bands compare Bitcoin’s market price with its realized price, or the average price at which coins last moved on-chain. In simple terms, they show whether the market is trading at unusually high profit or loss levels.

BTC MVRV pricing bands vs. price. Source: Glassnode

As of Wednesday, Bitcoin was trading near $60,997, while the 1.0 MVRV band, shown in green, sat around $53,390. That level closely matches the technical downside target near $54,000, making it an important support zone if BTC extends its decline.

Related: Bitcoin nearly loses $59K as DXY surges: Are traders bracing for more pain?

A deeper selloff, however, could push Bitcoin toward the 0.8 MVRV band, shown in blue, near $42,700. Historically, Bitcoin’s major bear-market bottoms have formed around this lower blue band, where unrealized losses become extreme, and capitulation risk rises.

The European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) has asked the European Commission to examine whether additional parts of the crypto sector—such as crypto lending and borrowing, staking, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized finance (DeFi)—should be brought within the EU’s regulatory perimeter. The request is set out in an own-initiative resolution tabled for the Parliament’s plenary vote, where it is expected to be considered on July 7.

While the measure would not amend the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) or create new legal obligations, it signals how lawmakers may shape subsequent Commission proposals and supervisory priorities. For crypto-asset service providers, banks, and institutional investors, the resolution matters less for immediate enforceable change and more for how it could influence the direction of EU crypto policy—particularly around stablecoins and “tokenization” of traditional financial services.

Key takeaways

• ECON urges the European Commission to assess whether crypto lending/borrowing, staking, NFTs, and DeFi merit additional regulation beyond MiCA.
• The draft resolution supports the development of euro-denominated stablecoins within MiCA and frames them as potentially complementary to tokenized bank deposits and wholesale central bank digital currency models.
• ECON calls for consistent, EU-wide application of MiCA to avoid divergent national rules that could fragment the single market.
• If adopted, the resolution would become the Parliament’s official policy position, but it would not modify MiCA or impose new obligations.

ECON’s resolution: expanding the policy lens beyond MiCA

The recommendations were drafted by Belgian Member of the European Parliament Johan Van Overtveldt and advanced through ECON’s internal negotiations before being tabled for a plenary vote. According to the European Parliament’s procedure documents, the resolution is an own-initiative instrument designed to set out guidance for the Commission regarding the future shape of EU digital asset regulation.

ECON’s central request is forward-looking: the committee asks the Commission to evaluate regulatory coverage for activities that are not uniformly addressed by MiCA’s current scope. The resolution explicitly references crypto lending and borrowing, staking, NFTs, and DeFi—areas that, in practice, span multiple business models and may involve varying degrees of custody, asset pooling, market-making, governance structures, and cross-border service provision.

For compliance teams and regulated intermediaries, the key issue is not simply “whether” these activities should be regulated, but “how” and “under which regime.” MiCA already establishes licensing and authorization requirements for certain crypto-asset service providers, while other frameworks—such as rules on anti-money laundering (AML), consumer protection, and market conduct—may apply depending on structure and distribution. ECON’s call indicates lawmakers want clearer boundaries and regulatory coherence as these products evolve.

Stablecoins and tokenized finance: a more constructive regulatory stance

A major element of the ECON resolution relates to stablecoins, particularly those denominated in euros. The text frames euro stablecoins as potentially supportive of the EU’s payments ecosystem and encourages their development within MiCA’s framework.

That approach reflects a broader policy shift among some European institutions, including a recognition that stablecoins can operate alongside—rather than necessarily replace—existing money and payment rails. ECON links euro-denominated stablecoins to potential integration with tokenized commercial bank deposits and wholesale central bank digital currencies, suggesting that future EU financial infrastructure could incorporate multiple “digital money” channels.

The policy context is particularly sensitive given how stablecoin arrangements interact with banking liquidity and reserve management. In earlier discussions around the banking turbulence in the United States, concerns were tied to reserve custody and banking counterparties. For example, during the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, USDC issuer Circle reportedly held a material portion of reserves at the bank, and USDC briefly lost its dollar peg. Although those events occurred outside the EU, they continue to influence how European policymakers evaluate reserve quality, redemption arrangements, and systemic risk controls for stablecoins.

ECON’s resolution also aligns with the committee’s parallel work on the euro’s digital future. It references legislative momentum supporting a “coexistence” model for a potential digital euro alongside private digital money solutions—an approach that suggests policymakers may view stablecoins and public digital currency designs as complementary components of a broader digital payments architecture.

MiCA implementation pressure and the question of national divergence

The resolution goes beyond new regulatory topics by focusing on execution and market structure. It urges consistent application of MiCA across member states to preserve a level playing field for crypto firms. This is a crucial compliance concern: when national regulators introduce additional or differing requirements, firms face increased operating cost, legal uncertainty, and fragmentation of distribution strategies within the EU.

ECON’s earlier draft, presented by Van Overtveldt in February, reportedly focused more tightly on MiCA’s existing framework—such as stablecoin classifications and legal certainty for multi-issued stablecoins. Over months of negotiation, the committee incorporated a broader set of policy questions, culminating in the current recommendation set that also calls for reconsideration of regulatory coverage for activities such as DeFi and staking.

At the EU level, the Commission is already working to reassess parts of MiCA’s scope. In May, the European Commission launched a public consultation seeking input on whether the framework should be expanded to cover areas that include DeFi, staking, lending, NFTs, and tokenized financial assets, while also revisiting debates around MiCA’s ban on interest-bearing stablecoins. Although consultations are not binding legislation, they typically shape the Commission’s next steps and can provide a timeline for future legislative proposals.

Implementation is also time-bound. MiCA’s transitional period is set to end on July 1, after which crypto-asset service providers generally need authorization under MiCA to continue operating across the EU. That deadline increases the practical stakes for firms regarding licensing strategy, supervision expectations, and product mapping—especially for services that may fall near the edges between crypto-asset activity and activities that regulators may treat differently under existing financial law.

Institutional implications: compliance, consumer protection, and legal clarity

For banks, payment firms, and institutional investors assessing crypto exposure, the resolution underscores that EU oversight is moving toward a more comprehensive assessment of how crypto activities affect market integrity and risk allocation. Even without immediate amendments to MiCA, the Parliament’s policy position can influence supervisory guidance, regulatory interpretation, and the Commission’s legislative drafting priorities.

Key open questions remain. ECON’s call does not specify a single mechanism for extending regulation, and the outcome of the plenary vote would only establish a non-binding political mandate for the Commission. In practice, the future direction could depend on how the Commission and co-legislators determine which activities are best addressed by MiCA extensions versus other EU regimes (for example, rules tied to financial services licensing, AML/KYC, consumer protection, or market abuse).

Cross-border coordination is also likely to remain a central theme. DeFi and tokenized asset activities often rely on service providers, intermediaries, or infrastructure operating across jurisdictions. As the EU considers regulatory scope expansion, compliance teams will need to monitor how authorization requirements, supervisory expectations, and governance standards may be applied to novel business models—particularly those with decentralized features that complicate “who is responsible” under traditional regulatory frameworks.

Closing perspective

As the July 7 plenary vote approaches, the resolution’s adoption would provide the European Parliament with an explicit mandate on crypto regulatory coverage, reinforcing pressure on the Commission’s ongoing MiCA review process. The central item for observers is how the Commission translates this political direction into concrete legislative options—if any—particularly for stablecoins, DeFi-adjacent services, and staking-related business models.

SoftBank Group shares have plunged more than 12% after reports suggested OpenAI is considering delaying its planned initial public offering until 2027 to preserve a potential valuation of up to $1 trillion.

According to reports, SoftBank shares dropped as much as 13% during trading in Tokyo on Friday before closing 12.53% lower, making the investment conglomerate one of the biggest contributors to the Nikkei 225’s roughly 4% decline.

The selloff followed reports that OpenAI executives are weighing whether to proceed with a lower-valued IPO this year or postpone the listing until 2027 while continuing to pursue a valuation approaching $1 trillion.

Reports indicated that OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman opposed reducing the company’s valuation simply to accelerate a stock market debut. Although the company confidentially filed a draft registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this month, OpenAI said at the time that no final decision had been made on the timing of an IPO and that it could remain privately held for longer.

OpenAI’s expanding business has increased investor focus

Pressure on SoftBank has intensified because of its growing financial commitment to OpenAI. The Japanese investment group agreed in February to invest another $30 billion into the artificial intelligence company. Once completed, the transaction will raise SoftBank’s total commitment to about $64.6 billion and give it an ownership stake of roughly 13%.

Because of that exposure, investors have increasingly treated SoftBank as one of the largest public proxies for OpenAI’s future value. A later public listing would not reduce SoftBank’s ownership, but it would postpone the first market-based valuation of its investment and delay any opportunity to monetize part of the stake.

The latest market reaction follows months of rapid expansion by OpenAI. Earlier this week, the company introduced its first custom-built artificial intelligence chip, Jalapeño, developed with Broadcom to support inference workloads powering ChatGPT, Codex, and future AI agents. 

According to OpenAI, developing proprietary silicon forms part of its strategy to control more of the infrastructure behind its AI services while reducing dependence on third-party hardware providers.

OpenAI also unveiled its GPT-5.6 model family on Friday under the names Sol, Terra, and Luna. Although the names quickly drew attention across crypto communities because of their similarity to well-known blockchain projects, OpenAI said they represent capability tiers within the model lineup rather than any connection to digital assets.

Recent OpenAI developments have kept the company in focus

OpenAI has remained at the center of attention outside its product launches as well. Last week, reports said Amazon withdrew from distributing Artificial, a film centered on Sam Altman, while discussions continued with filmmakers about finding another distribution partner. According to the report, Amazon’s decision came as the company expanded its commercial relationship with OpenAI through a multi-billion-dollar investment commitment linked to future milestones, although Amazon has not publicly connected the two developments.

Meanwhile, SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son defended the company’s aggressive investment strategy only two days before Friday’s selloff. Rejecting concerns that heavy spending on artificial intelligence resembles a speculative bubble, Son maintained his confidence in long-term AI investment despite growing market volatility surrounding OpenAI’s expected path to the public markets.

The European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) has formally pushed the European Commission to consider whether several fast-growing areas of the crypto market should fall under EU-wide rules. In an own-initiative resolution scheduled for a plenary vote, lawmakers ask the Commission to assess the regulatory perimeter for crypto lending and borrowing, staking, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and decentralized finance (DeFi), while also encouraging broader tokenization across financial services.

The proposal, drafted by Belgian MEP Johan Van Overtveldt, will be submitted to the full Parliament for voting expected on July 7. If adopted, it would become the Parliament’s policy position—but it would not itself amend the existing Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) or create new binding legal obligations.

Key takeaways

• ECON is urging the European Commission to evaluate whether lending/borrowing, staking, NFTs and DeFi should be regulated beyond MiCA’s current coverage.
• The draft strongly supports the development of euro-denominated stablecoins under MiCA to support payments and tokenized financial infrastructure.
• ECON wants consistent application of MiCA across EU member states, warning against national rule-making that could fragment the market.
• The resolution is set for a plenary vote around July 7 and would reflect Parliament’s stance without directly changing MiCA.

From MiCA scope to a wider policy checklist

MiCA already provides an EU framework for certain categories of crypto assets and sets licensing expectations for crypto-asset service providers. But ECON’s report signals that lawmakers are now looking past MiCA’s current boundaries. The resolution asks the Commission to assess regulatory needs for additional activity types, including staking and crypto lending and borrowing, as well as NFTs and DeFi.

The timing matters for investors and operators because the Commission is already in review mode. According to the report’s context, the European Commission launched a public consultation in May on whether MiCA should be expanded to cover DeFi, staking, lending, NFTs and tokenized financial assets, and whether the current ban on interest-bearing stablecoins should be revisited. ECON’s resolution effectively adds political weight to those questions, by asking the Commission to consider a broader regulatory scope rather than treating MiCA as a closed endpoint.

In addition, lawmakers stress the importance of a level playing field for firms operating across the EU. The draft encourages consistent MiCA implementation throughout member states, and warns against additional national requirements that could fragment regulation and force crypto businesses to navigate a patchwork of rules.

Stablecoins shift from suspicion to policy support

While the resolution opens the door to evaluating regulation for more crypto activity types, it also reflects an increasingly supportive stance toward euro-denominated stablecoins. ECON backs the development of regulated stablecoins under MiCA and ties that support to the bloc’s payments strategy and broader tokenization plans across financial services.

The report’s stablecoin emphasis also follows a notable change in tone from some senior crypto critics in recent weeks. The policy direction comes shortly after former Bank for International Settlements general manager Agustín Carstens softened his stance on stablecoins and highlighted a potential coexistence with fiat systems, according to earlier coverage referenced in the source material.

ECON’s stablecoin perspective is consistent with the idea that euro-backed tokens could complement existing financial rails. The resolution argues that euro-denominated stablecoins could complement tokenized commercial bank deposits and wholesale central bank digital currencies, while also enabling faster and cheaper cross-border payments. It further claims that wider use could strengthen EU financial markets’ competitiveness and support the euro’s international role.

Importantly for market participants, these points do not signal a standalone rule change by themselves. Instead, they serve as a political directive: policymakers appear increasingly willing to treat certain stablecoin use cases as strategically valuable—provided they operate within the EU’s regulatory framework.

Why this vote matters for the EU crypto market

The ECON report is an own-initiative resolution, meaning it is Parliament setting out recommendations for the Commission rather than directly legislating. Even so, a Parliament-backed position can influence how regulators prioritize consultations, drafting work, and the next round of policy decisions.

The filing process also underscores what is at stake. The text drafted by Van Overtveldt went through negotiations and amendments within ECON before receiving committee approval. An earlier draft, presented in February, focused more narrowly on MiCA’s existing framework, including stablecoin classifications and legal certainty for multi-issued stablecoins. Months later, the committee’s final version broadens the emphasis toward whether additional crypto sectors—particularly DeFi-like activity and token-driven financial primitives—should be pulled under a more explicit regulatory framework.

Meanwhile, MiCA’s implementation timetable is already moving. The transitional period for crypto asset service providers ends July 1, after which providers generally must hold authorization under the regulation to continue serving customers across the EU. For businesses watching for additional MiCA expansion, the July plenary vote on the resolution could be another step in shaping regulatory expectations—especially for models that don’t neatly fit within today’s MiCA categories.

A broader push for “digital money” coexistence

ECON’s approach aligns with a parallel strand of EU digital money policy. In the source context, the committee previously backed legislation for a digital euro, with lawmakers arguing that public and private forms of digital money should coexist rather than compete.

That political framing matters because it helps explain why stablecoins and tokenized deposits are treated as complementary tools instead of outright replacements. If the Parliament’s position is adopted and the Commission follows through during its MiCA review process, the next policy cycle could be defined less by whether crypto should exist, and more by how different digital money instruments should interact within an overarching EU framework.

Readers should watch the European Commission’s response to its May consultation and any follow-on legislative proposals once the July 7 plenary vote sets Parliament’s official stance. The key uncertainty is how the Commission will translate “assessment” questions—especially around DeFi, staking, lending/borrowing, and NFTs—into concrete regulatory boundaries without undermining the consistent MiCA implementation ECON says it wants across the EU.

A survey arranged by digital asset services provider CoinShares found that more than half of UK-based financial advisers reported the bulk of their clients’ crypto holdings were outside their oversight.

According to the results of a CoinShares survey released on Thursday, 52% of UK advisers in a group of 261 European wealth management professionals said that the majority of their clients’ digital assets exposure was essentially “invisible” to them. Among all the EU countries surveyed, including France, Germany, Italy and Switzerland, the number was 25%, with 61% of advisers saying that they worked in companies that explicitly restricted digital assets or provided no clear internal guidance.

“The capital has already been allocated,” said CoinShares co-founder and CEO Jean-Marie Mognetti. “The people entrusted with managing it simply cannot see it, and in most cases not because clients are unwilling to engage, but because firm policy prevents them from doing so. This is not a knowledge problem. It is not a demand problem. It is a firm-policy problem becoming a wrong-way risk.”

He added:

“[…] Visibility comes before advice. You cannot allocate, manage risk or earn trust over assets you cannot see.”

Source: CoinShares

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the watchdog overseeing digital asset regulation, reported in December that about 8% of the country’s adults were invested in crypto. The group recently proposed allowing authorized investment funds to hold up to a 10% allocation of cryptocurrency exchange-traded notes.

Related: Bank of England eases stablecoin rules, introduces 40B pound issuance cap

Potential new leadership to shake up UK crypto policy?

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer resigned as Labour leader on Monday amid pressure from many in his own party, opening the door to a recently elected member of parliament to take the reins.

In a recent by-election, former Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham won a seat as a member of parliament representing Makerfield, positioning him to be heavily favored by many in Labour to replace Starmer. While it’s unclear how Burnham may handle crypto policy on a national stage, as mayor, he supported the blockchain industry as a driver for economic development.

Magazine: AI is banking the unbanked in Africa… faster than crypto

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.