My biggest pet peeve with meeting apps is that each one has a different shortcut for muting your mic or turning off your webcam. It’s hard to remember which keys do what when you’re mid-meeting and trying to make a point or ask a question. I always wanted a physical, universal button for mute and camera control — something I could hit without thinking. Project Mirage’s Dune, a tiny, three-key aluminum keypad — about the size of a stick of gum — that plugs into your MacBook’s USB-C port, does just that.
The $119 gadget has three buttons, and it changes context based on what app you are looking at. For instance, in meeting apps and sites, it could be toggle mic, toggle video, and bring window to the front. For Excel or Sheets, it could be copy, paste, and undo. For Chrome, it could be refresh, jump to URL bar, and paste. You get the gist. Developers can also use it with apps like VS Code or GitHub to merge, approve, or close a pull request.
The startup builds each unit to match your specific Mac model, so it sits flush against the laptop with no gap underneath. If your ports are already in use, you can connect it through a dongle instead. Dune has no battery and needs no separate charger — it draws power straight from the MacBook.
Advertisement
Currently, the startup supports M2 Air or later and M1 Pro or later models of MacBook running macOS 15 Sequoia or a later version.
The device looks and feels nice, but I felt the keys had more resistance. Right now, it is easy to push a key by mistake. A few times, I mistakenly unmuted myself or killed my camera because my hand brushed the device while reaching for a water bottle or coffee mug. It shouldn’t be this easy to press a key.
Dune ships with a companion app for configuring shortcuts, either per-app or system-wide. Within a given app, you can assign a Dune key to a keyboard shortcut, a command, or a link that opens an app or URL.
Image Credits:Project Mirage
Through the app, Dune also syncs with your calendar and surfaces your next meeting a few minutes before it starts, so you can join, dismiss, or send an “I’m running late” message with one tap.
If you want deeper customization, you can write and run your own Python script. If you don’t code, Dune has an easy integration with Claude Desktop: You describe the shortcut you want in plain language, and Claude writes it and assigns it to a key for that app — no manual setup required.
Advertisement
I built a shortcut that, whenever I’m on a startup’s website, pulls up a quick brief on the company: its competitors, investors, and questions I might ask if I booked a meeting with them. For anyone whose job involves sizing up companies quickly — investors, founders, operators — it’s a task tailor-made for Dune. I also built one that converts images to JPEG so I can upload them quickly to WordPress or social platforms. Both were easy to build and needed no manual configuration, though getting a shortcut fully working still takes some back-and-forth with Claude, including debugging once you actually run it.
The app also has a marketplace, from where you can explore skills made by other Dune owners. If the marketplace takes off, it could become core to Dune’s growth and retention strategy — hardware as a thin front end for a Claude-powered skills ecosystem, where each new skill gives owners one more reason to stick around.
However, at the moment, there are only limited skills. Plus, there is no way to test out a skill without assigning it to the hardware button — ideally, the app would let you preview a skill before committing it to hardware. The startup also needs to proactively add more of its own suggested skills for different apps to its users.
Project Mirage’s device retails for $149 after its introductory price expires, and it’s a solid pick for anyone productivity-minded. MuteMe covers just mute/unmute, and Stream Deck offers business-focused macros, but Dune is easier to customize on both hardware and software.
Advertisement
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
The change in policy will create new rights for employees looking to stay in their careers for longer, as well as bring in new legal and operational obligations for employers.
This past week (commencing 29 June), the Department of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment brought into effect the Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Act 2025, which introduces significant new rights for employees in Ireland and also places new legal restrictions and responsibilities on employers.
The new rules mean that eligible employees, who wish to do so, can now choose to remain employed at their place of work for a period of time beyond their contractual retirement age, where that age is below the State Pension age of 66.
The eligible employee can retire as scheduled if that is their choice and if they elect to stay on, they must formally notify their employer of their plans at least three to six months in advance.
Advertisement
The employer will be expected to consider any notification made under the new act and if they intend to compel retirement at a certain age, there are criteria to be met – namely, they have to respond to a notification within one month, clearly establish the basis for the decision and ensure that it is in line with the higher legal threshold set out in the act.
In support of the new act, the Minister of State for Small Businesses, Retail and Employment Alan Dillon, TD has signed into law an updated Code of Practice on Longer Working, which was developed by the Workplace Relations Commission and is now also in full effect.
Successful complaints around the new legislation brought by an employee through the Workplace Relations Commission could be awarded up to two years’ remuneration or €40,000, depending on which figure is higher.
On the employer’s side, a failure to provide a reasonable response to retirement notifications may constitute a criminal offence and is punishable by a Class A fine of up to €5,000 or imprisonment for up to 12 months.
Advertisement
Golden years
Commenting on the recent change in policy, Ruadhri McGarry, an associate director at IT Search and a DevOps, cloud and cybersecurity specialist recruiter, explained that the right to request a later retirement date will also give older employees additional reassurances.
McGarry told SiliconRepublic.com, “It removes two specific worries. Financially, they can work at full pay for another year and continue pension contributions accordingly, and professionally, not everyone wants to retire – and so many people within the STEM community are deeply passionate about their work.”
It is an opportunity that he believes many people operating in the STEM space are going to take advantage of, particularly as he has noticed an increase in retirement-age professionals extending their tenure as they are still more than capable of producing exceptional work. In many cases they might pivot to consulting work to supplement income, but more often, in his opinion, it is about personal happiness and not feeling that they need to retire based on a calendar.
He said, “We all need a sense of purpose and if any professional can contribute their decades of experience and drive, there is no real reason for them to stop.”
Advertisement
Turning challenge into opportunity
In the wake of the new rules, there may also be an opportunity for organisations to further capitalise on the expertise of employees reaching retirement age.
McGarry said, “From a big-picture perspective, that is an entire additional year, or more, that can add to the industrial body of knowledge.”
He added: “I fully expect employers to use this legislation and subsequent to maximise knowledge transfer across the generations, utilising senior employees to bring new focus to mentoring, project leadership and expertise retention.
“Any legislative change that offers more choice to employees is always welcome, and those that choose to extend their careers for whatever reason will no doubt add a small but significant layer of experience to an entire sector.”
Advertisement
Addressing concerns that extending the tenure of older employees may limit opportunities for early-career starters or younger workers, McGarry is of the opinion that organisations will be clever in how they spend the remaining time with the established workforce.
“I expect that when this change in legislation kicks in, firms will utilise that year to focus on knowledge transfer from technical staff approaching this new retirement date, giving a new focus for their final year,” he said.
“The limiting of opportunities for career starters would be minimal and more than offset by having additional time to learn from those at the end of their professional journey.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Looking for the most recent Strands answer? Click here for our daily Strands hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Today’s NYT Strands puzzle is a fun one. It has a holiday topic, and the answer grid shows up in bright colors, which fits the theme. Some of the answers are difficult to unscramble, so if you need hints and answers, read on.
If that doesn’t help you, here’s a clue: Happy 250th birthday!
Clue words to unlock in-game hints
Your goal is to find hidden words that fit the puzzle’s theme. If you’re stuck, find any words you can. Every time you find three words of four letters or more, Strands will reveal one of the theme words. These are the words I used to get those hints but any words of four or more letters that you find will work:
DARE, FARE, PARK, BROIL, ROIL, SPAR, COIL, BOIL, FAIL
Answers for today’s Strands puzzle
These are the answers that tie into the theme. The goal of the puzzle is to find them all, including the spangram, a theme word that reaches from one side of the puzzle to the other. When you have all of them (I originally thought there were always eight but learned that the number can vary), every letter on the board will be used. Here are the nonspangram answers:
BRIGHT, COLORFUL, DAZZLING, EXCITING, SPARKLING
Today’s Strands spangram
The completed NYT Strands puzzle for July 4, 2026.
NYT/Screenshot by CNET
Today’s Strands spangram is FIREWORKS. To find it, look for the F that is four letters to the right on the bottom row, and wind up.
Semiconductor stocks lost 12% in two sessions while the Dow hit a record, as investors rotated from AI chip makers to enterprise software companies. A weak jobs report crushed rate-hike odds.
The trade that defined the first half of 2026, buying anything with proximity to a GPU, broke apart in the holiday-shortened week before Independence Day. The PHLX Semiconductor Index, which had surged more than 80% in the first half, sank 6.3% on Wednesday and 5.4% on Thursday, a two-session decline of roughly 12%.
Advertisement
While chip stocks cratered, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a record 52,900 on Thursday, lifted by a 5% surge in Apple after Bloomberg reported the company had instructed suppliers to prepare 10 million foldable iPhones for a launch this autumn. All three major indices finished the week higher despite the rotation.
The numbers behind the crack
Micron Technology led the decline, falling more than 10% on Wednesday alone. SanDisk, Applied Materials, and Lam Research all dropped roughly 10%, while Intel and Marvell each lost about 9%.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Advertisement
The selling intensified after reports that SK Hynix was slowing its expansion of high-bandwidth memory production, a signal that the supply side of the AI infrastructure boom may be catching up with demand. Equipment makers ASML, KLA, and Applied Materials all fell between 5% and 6%, suggesting investors are pricing in a slowdown in chip-factory orders.
The damage to chip stocks happened against a backdrop of broader macro uncertainty. June nonfarm payrolls came in at just 57,000, roughly half the 110,000 consensus estimate, and revisions to April and May cut a combined 74,000 jobs from previous tallies.
The unemployment rate dipped to 4.2%, but only because the labour force participation rate fell to 61.5%, its lowest level since March 2021.
Snowflake surged 36% in late May after reporting strong earnings, adding 616 net new customers and lifting its count of million-dollar accounts to 779. ServiceNow, Oracle, and Palantir each rallied 6% to 8% in the session that followed.
The logic is straightforward. Investors spent two years paying premium multiples for the companies that supply AI infrastructure, and now they want evidence that it is generating revenue for the companies that deploy it.
The first half left all three major indices in strong shape. The S&P 500 gained 9.6%, the Nasdaq rose more than 12%, and the Dow climbed 8.9%, its best first-half performance since 2021.
Advertisement
But the Shiller CAPE ratio sits at 38 to 40, second only to the dot-com peak of 44, and market concentration in the largest technology stocks has exceeded year-2000 levels. The difference, proponents argue, is that this time the companies are among the most profitable in corporate history, with Nvidia alone reporting net income exceeding $120 billion for fiscal 2026.
The counterargument is that profitability at the top of the supply chain does not guarantee profitability in the middle. Hyperscalers are on track to spend more than $650 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026, and the question that spooked markets in the holiday-shortened week is whether anyone below Nvidia in the stack will earn returns that justify those prices.
What the Fed changes
The weak jobs report reshaped the interest-rate picture overnight. The probability of a Fed rate hike at the 29 July meeting collapsed to about 22%, with a hold now the overwhelming favourite at 78%.
Fed chairman Kevin Warsh called the jobs picture “steady” and continued to emphasise his commitment to the 2% inflation target, without offering forward guidance on the rate path. A Fed that stays on hold gives equity markets one less reason to sell, but it also removes the catalyst that had been supporting bank stocks and the dollar earlier in the quarter.
Advertisement
What to watch
The market reopens on Monday with Q2 earnings season approaching. The results that matter most will come from the AI software layer: whether Snowflake’s customer additions accelerate, whether Palantir’s commercial pipeline converts, and whether ServiceNow’s AI attach rate holds at the levels it projected.
If the software companies deliver, the rotation will look prescient. If they disappoint, the AI trade will face a harder question: what happens when the infrastructure is built and the applications do not come.
Samsung’s next generation of foldable smartphones may arrive with significantly higher price tags than their predecessors. According to information shared by Roland Quandt of WinFuture, the upcoming Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, Galaxy Z Flip 8, and the Galaxy Watch 9 lineup are all expected to see price increases in Europe when they are unveiled later this month.
While flagship smartphones have steadily become more expensive over the past few years, the leaked pricing suggests Samsung could be taking another sizeable step upward, particularly for buyers opting for higher storage variants.
Samsung’s premium foldables may be getting even more premium
Samsung is expected to announce its new foldables at its Galaxy Unpacked event on July 22, but retailer information obtained by Roland Quandt and WinFuture has already revealed what European buyers may have to pay. The most expensive device in the lineup will reportedly be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, replacing last year’s standard flagship Fold as Samsung’s top-tier foldable. The base 256GB model is tipped to cost €2,199 (approximately US$2,507), representing a €100 (US$114) increase over its predecessor.
Android Headlines
The price hikes become much steeper with larger storage options. The 512GB version is expected to retail for €2,399 (approximately US$2,735), up €180 (US$205), while the 1TB model could reach €2,799 (approximately US$3,191), marking a substantial €280 (US$319) increase. Samsung’s clamshell foldable is also expected to become more expensive. The Galaxy Z Flip 8 is tipped to start at €1,299 (approximately US$1,481) for 256GB storage, while the 512GB model could cost €1,499 (approximately US$1,709), reflecting increases of €100 (US$114) and €180 (US$205), respectively.
The biggest surprise is the arrival of the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8, which is expected to debut as a wider foldable positioned below the Ultra model. According to the leak, it will start at €1,999 for 256GB, while the 512GB and 1TB variants are expected to cost €2,199 and €2,599, respectively. Unlike the Ultra, the regular Fold is expected to make compromises in areas such as the camera system, including the omission of a dedicated zoom camera.
Advertisement
Samsung wearables to get expensive too
Samsung’s smartwatch lineup may also see higher prices. The Galaxy Watch 9 is tipped to start at €409 for the 40mm Bluetooth version, with LTE models commanding an additional premium. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 could launch at €749, around €50 higher than its predecessor.
Onleaks x Mymobiles
If the leak proves accurate, Samsung’s strategy appears to be clear: position its foldables and wearables even further into premium territory. For consumers, however, that could make the buying decision more difficult, especially as competitors such as Google, Honor, OnePlus, and Vivo continue to push foldable hardware while keeping prices relatively competitive.
None of these prices have been officially confirmed by Samsung, and regional pricing could differ when the devices launch globally. Even so, with just weeks remaining before Galaxy Unpacked, the leak provides one of the clearest indications yet that Samsung’s newest foldables may also become its most expensive.
Haven’t seen anything you like? The following phones are also worth considering:
Xiaomi 17T for £649 and 17T Pro for $870: If it weren’t for Honor’s high pricing, one of these phones (probably the 17T) would have claimed the best mid-range spot above. Compared with the Honor 600, the 17T offers slightly better performance with more RAM and a more reliable camera that has superior zoom capability. Unfortunately, it also has bags of bloatware, and the software requires some tinkering to get the best it offers. The 17T Pro adds wireless charging, a bigger battery, much better performance with a faster chipset, and a larger screen—but it’s even more expensive, pushing the top end of what I’d consider midrange.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find N6 for $1,943: Touting an 8.12-inch display, the Find N6 is a beautifully engineered folding phone that’s impossibly slim and light. Despite its promise of being creaseless, the fold is still discernible. You’ll hardly notice it when the screen is on, though you’ll feel it if you use the optional stylus. Performance is impressively slick, with enough stamina to see you through a busy day, and the camera system is excellent. It’s a big step up from last year’s N5, with a 200-MP main shooter, 50-MP telephoto, and 50-MP ultrawide, though it can’t quite compete with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra above. The global model is enabled to use familiar Google apps, but you’ll have to import those, as the phone won’t officially be released in the West, which is the main reason it fails to edge out Honor’s foldable above.
Xiaomi 15T Pro for $745: This phone is fast, with a large, high-refresh-rate screen; a versatile Leica-tuned camera system that includes a 50-MP telephoto lens offering 5X optical zoom; and a solid list of extras, including generous and speedy UFS 4.1 storage and Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 connectivity. The big downside here for most folks is the quirky software, but with a bit of effort, it’s possible to customize it into shape. There’s also some bloatware to remove, and Xiaomi doesn’t match some competitors on software support. The regular 15T is almost the same size but has a slightly weaker chipset and camera, a plastic frame, and misses out on wireless charging.
Advertisement
Infinix Note 60 Ultra for $750: Designed with the help of Pininfarina, famous for iconic cars from Ferrari and Maserati, the Note 60 Ultra looks interesting, with a distinctive curved glass section over the camera module that also houses a small matrix display. The phone arrives in a grand box with a curvy car-shaped wireless charger. The specs are solid, apart from the distinctly not “Ultra” chipset (MediaTek’s Dimensity 8400 Ultimate), but availability seems limited for now.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max for $1,039: A refreshing design featuring a second, smaller screen on the back that houses the camera lenses is the main way the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max differs from the 17 Pro. Xiaomi came up with various cute ways to employ this auxiliary display, including a selfie preview for superior selfies with the main camera, music controls, customizable themes, and virtual pets. There’s even a retro gaming case that lets you play Angry Birds, though it feels a bit silly when there’s a 6.7-inch screen on the other side. Aside from the second screen, the 17 Pro Max is a typical Xiaomi specs beast, and the 17 Pro isn’t far behind, but neither has been officially released outside China yet.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find X9 Pro for £1,099: Photography fans simply must check out the Oppo Find X9 Pro. The 200-megapixel telephoto lens supports 3X optical zoom and can take excellent shots at 6X zoom by cropping images down to 50 megapixels. To maximize camera capabilities, though, you’ll need the detachable Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit ($399). This enormous lens slots into place on the case and adds another 3.28X zoom, though it’s tricky to use without a tripod. An additional trio of 50-MP lenses, with all supporting 4K video recording at 60 fps with HDR, makes this a great pick for creatives. Impressive specs include a 6.78-inch flat display, IP66/68/69 ratings, and a 7,500-mAh silicon-carbon battery that’ll last for two days.
Advertisement
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra for £497 and F8 Pro for £331: Xiaomi’s cheaper, fun, youthful brand Poco provides room for experimentation, but the company’s own 15T Pro is a better buy in this price bracket. What the F8 Ultra offers that you won’t find elsewhere is a fun or awful (depending on your tastes) denim finish on the back. There are also Bose-tuned speakers, an excellent 6.9-inch display, and an enormous 6,500-mAh battery. It also has a flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and generous RAM and storage. There’s even a trio of 50-MP lenses in the camera. The F8 Pro is slightly smaller but drops little from the spec sheet, making it the better bargain.
Honor Magic 7 Pro for $999:Honor’s Magic 7 Pro features a solid triple-lens camera, a gorgeous 6.8-inch screen, speedy performance, good battery life, and a dual IP68 and IP69 dust- and water-resistance rating. Honor’s Magic OS boasts polished AI features, and Honor announced an increased commitment to seven years of Android version and security patch updates with this phone. The Magic 7 Pro’s downsides include its large camera cutout on the front, camera processing that’s sometimes heavy-handed, and its ultrawide camera struggling to match the other two lenses.
Advertisement
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro for $403: Xiaomi’s Poco X7 Pro is a compelling bargain that combines a lovely 6.67-inch display with relatively fast performance, good battery life, speedy wired charging, and IP68 water resistance. The 50-megapixel main camera is decent. The Poco X7 Pro runs Android 15 with HyperOS on top, and Xiaomi offers three Android version updates and four years of security patches. This was my budget pick before the Poco F7 (discontinued), and then the X8 Pro unseated it.
Doro Aurora A20 for £250: Doro is a Swedish company focused on providing devices that are accessible for older folks. It primarily focuses on phones but also sells a decent video doorbell. The Aurora A20 is an odd spin on the flip phone that may help some people transition to a touchscreen device. It’s like an old candy bar HTC Android phone with a flip-out keypad attached to the bottom. There are lots of thoughtful features, including an alarm button, a spacious keypad, and simplified software. It’s also fairly cheap, but I found the performance sluggish, the camera poor, and the design a bit chunky and heavy.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Realme 14 Pro+ for €369: The color-changing finish may be gimmicky, but it’s fun, and this phone looks and feels far more expensive than it is. There are more highs than lows on the spec sheet: You get a triple-lens camera, an IP68/69 water-resistance rating, a 6,000-mAh battery, and a 6.83-inch OLED display with a 120-Hz refresh rate. But the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset is limited, there’s no wireless charging support, and you don’t get a charger in the box. Even so, it’s still quite a bargain.
Advertisement
Xiaomi 15 for $750: Folks seeking a compact phone could do a lot worse than the Xiaomi 15. It feels lovely and has a 6.36-inch screen, a decent triple-lens camera, and top-notch internals. But it’s a conservative design, and it has software and bloatware issues.
Honor Magic 7 RSR for £1,550: Designed with Porsche, this souped-up version of the 7 Pro above has a fancier design with a hexagonal camera module, a slightly improved telephoto lens, 24 GB of RAM (likely largely pointless), 1 TB of storage, and a bigger battery (5,850 mAh). It’s lovely, but it doesn’t do enough to justify the additional outlay.
Avoid These Phones
These aren’t necessarily bad phones, but I think you’d be better served by an option above.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite: There’s a retro-cool vibe to Nothing’s translucent hardware and pixelated software, and this is currently the cheapest phone it offers in the UK (it wasn’t released in the US). The screen, battery life, and software are decent, but the camera and bloatware were disappointing. I don’t think the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is the worst, but you can do better.
Advertisement
Nubia Z80 Ultra: Similar to my gaming pick above, the Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro, the Nubia Z80 Ultra trades off a better camera for slightly diminished performance and screen quality. It’s also a real brick with an enormous camera module on the back, making it awkward to handle, though I do like the dedicated camera button. Despite a very impressive spec sheet for the money, it manages to feel like less than the sum of its parts. Nubia’s software is subpar, and for this phone, it commits to only three years of security updates and a single Android version upgrade.
Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G: This slim, lightweight midrange phone boasts a 6.8-inch screen (brightness is limited), a triple-lens camera (solid 50-MP main and telephoto lenses with a disappointing 8-MP ultrawide), and an impressive IP69 water-resistance rating. Battery life is good, and wired charging is fast, but there’s no wireless charging. It’s packed with bloatware but also AI features and tools covering transcription, summarization, image editing, and more that may add value for some folks. After some time with the 13 Pro, I feel you can do better for the money.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: Officially released only in China, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 is a stylish folding phone with a 6.56-inch outer screen that folds open to reveal a 7.98-inch inner screen. It also offers solid performance and battery life, but despite having a large quad-lens camera module, the camera is underwhelming. The crease is also pronounced, and using a Chinese model is a bit of a pain, as various items are not translated, and getting the apps you want takes work.
Advertisement
Photograph: Simon Hill
Realme GT7 Pro: This potential flagship killer has a 6.78-inch OLED screen, a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, and an enormous 6,500-mAh battery. You also get a triple-lens camera, but the 50-megapixel main and telephoto lenses are let down by the 8-megapixel ultrawide. It also lacks wireless charging, and it only seems to be on sale in Germany.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+: Here, you’ll get an attractive and durable design (IP68), a 200-megapixel Samsung camera sensor, and decent battery life with superfast charging (120 watts). But those wins come at the price of middling performance, poor ultrawide (8 MP) and macro (2 MP) lenses, and a ton of bloatware. Ultimately, there’s little improvement over last year’s Redmi Note 13 Pro+. Not only are there better phones for the same money—there are better Xiaomi phones.
Should You Import One of These Phones?
While some phones are not officially sold in the US (or certain other countries), you can still get your hands on them if you’d like. They’re often easy to buy online, and you may even find some on Amazon. But before you buy, you’ll want to consider a few factors.
Advertisement
Phone Model and Supported Bands
The technologies and specific bands upon which cellular networks rely differ from country to country. While models described as “global” and even specifically UK or European models are likely to work in the US, they may not support all the bands your carrier uses. Missing LTE or 5G bands can mean patchy service or even relegate you to 3G. Chinese and other country-specific models will almost certainly lack some common US bands and may not work on some carrier networks.
You will often find this information in the listing or aggregated on websites like Kimovil, but I recommend checking directly with the manufacturer and your carrier.
Customs Charges
Advertisement
Depending on where you buy, importing a phone can lead to customs charges and add a significant expense to the overall cost. Do your research and factor in any extra fees before you buy.
Android and Google Services
It is common for phones released only in China to ship without any Google services, including the Google Play Store. Many Chinese manufacturers have their own app stores or preinstall third-party app stores for the Chinese market. Sometimes it’s a simple case of checking a box to unlock and download Google services, but it’s not always so easy.
Even where Google services are supported, some Chinese phones won’t work properly with certain apps, such as Android Auto. Lack of support can leave you stuck with specific Chinese default apps and services, and many banking apps won’t work as they would on a US or global model.
Advertisement
With regard to Huawei phones in particular, the company developed an independent ecosystem of apps and services following its US ban. The latest models run HarmonyOS. Although it was originally forked from the Android Open Source Project, it is now completely separate, and Huawei phones can no longer run Android apps.
I try to use every smartphone I test as my main phone for at least a week, sometimes longer. I stress-test performance by playing the most demanding mobile games and recording videos at the highest resolution. I make calls to test the smartphone’s microphone and speaker quality.
I often test the camera side by side with a competing phone and analyze the photos on a larger, more color-accurate screen. I’ve been reviewing all kinds of smartphones, from budget devices to flagships, for more than a decade.
A dual United States and Estonian citizen has been extradited to the U.S. to face charges alleging he was a member of the Scattered Spider hacking collective.
19-year-old Peter Stokes (who used the online handles “Bouquet,” “Spencer,” and “Jordan”) was arrested in Finland on April 10 while attempting to board a flight to Japan at Helsinki’s airport and is accused of having helped extort millions of dollars from multiple high-profile companies worldwide.
According to court documents, Stokes was involved in at least four Scattered Spider breaches (including a March 2023 hack of an online communication platform, when he was 16 years old) that led to victim companies being asked to pay millions of dollars in ransoms.
The list of victims breached with the suspect’s help also includes an unnamed multibillion-dollar “luxury item retailer” in May 2025, when the hackers allegedly called the company’s IT helpdesk, posing as employees, to reset credentials and gain access to administrator accounts.
While the threat actors demanded an $8 million ransom, claiming to have 100 gigabytes of stolen data, the company refused to pay. However, it still incurred over $2 million due to operations disruption and remediation costs.
Advertisement
Stokes now faces charges of fraud, conspiracy, and computer intrusion and has remained in custody after appearing in federal court in Chicago on Tuesday.
Peter Stokes (U.S. Department of Justice)
”The criminal complaint charges Peter Stokes with membership in Scattered Spider, a hacking group that has been involved in over 100 network intrusions, resulting in more than $100 million in ransom payments and millions more in damages to the victims,” said Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva on Wednesday.
“Scattered Spider has repeatedly targeted U.S. companies, extorting employees, inflicting millions of dollars in losses, and disrupting essential operations,” added Assistant Director Brett Leatherman of the FBI’s Cyber Division.
Scattered Spider (also tracked as 0ktapus, Octo Tempest, Scatter Swine, UNC3944, and Muddled Libra) emerged in 2022 as a loosely knit hacking collective mainly composed of teenagers and young adults from the United States and Great Britain.
They are known for using a blend of social engineering, targeted multi-factor authentication (MFA) bombing (aka MFA fatigue), and SMS credential phishing attacks to steal user credentials and sensitive documents for extortion leverage after breaching their targets’ networks.
Apple appears to be growing increasingly confident in its first foldable iPhone. A new report claims the company has raised its production plans for the long-rumoured iPhone Fold to 10 million units for the remainder of 2026.
That’s according to Nikkei Asia, which previously reported that Apple was targeting between seven and eight million foldable iPhones this year. The new figure aligns more closely with an earlier 11 million-unit claim from leaker Digital Chat Station.
If the latest estimate proves accurate, it could signal that Apple is preparing for a much bigger launch than many expected.
Previous rumours suggested manufacturing challenges around the foldable display, hinge and internal circuit board could limit production. However, increasing orders would indicate those issues may now be under control.
Advertisement
The report also offers another clue about timing. Since the 10 million figure covers Apple’s 2026 production plans, it adds weight to speculation that the iPhone Fold could still debut alongside the rest of the iPhone lineup in September instead of slipping into 2027. Some rumours have suggested it could be delayed. That said, Apple could still unveil the device this year and delay shipments until later if production runs into problems.
Advertisement
Foldables are also likely to become a much bigger part of the wider market next year. Separate industry estimates suggest Apple’s first foldable could account for 29% of global folding display orders in 2026. This would put it close to Samsung’s projected 31% share and ahead of Huawei’s estimated 24%.
The report arrives alongside broader claims about Apple’s production strategy. The company is said to be planning more than 220 million iPhones across its entire range in 2026. At the same time, Apple is asking suppliers to reserve additional iPhone 17 components to reduce the risk of shortages.
Advertisement
Apple’s launch schedule could also look a little different next year. Rumours continue to suggest the standard iPhone 18 may move from its traditional September slot to spring 2027. This could leave more room for premium models, including the iPhone Fold.
For now, Apple’s foldable plans remain unofficial. But increasing production targets from around eight million to 10 million units suggests the company is becoming more confident. Its first folding iPhone could be one of its biggest launches in years.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker: Two-minute review
It may not always be among the first brands to get a particular type of product to market, but you can usually rely on Bose to have done a proper job by the time it gets around to it. And on paper, that seems to be exactly what’s happened with this new Lifestyle Ultra Speaker — it’s priced and specified to meet the market-leaders head on, and has one or two points of difference to try and make its case even stronger.
The looks, for instance, are just distinct enough from the usual ‘cylinder of sound’ design to stand out in a showroom. The specification, which includes a 38mm mid/high driver angled to fire upwards through the top of the cabinet, promises authentic spatial audio performance where many a rival relies on digital sound processing in an effort to achieve the effect. And the appearance of Alexa+ as a voice assistant marks the first time a non-Amazon product is using the technology.
Advertisement
One of the best wireless speakers around? Yes, in a word. In practice, the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker has an awful lot to recommend it and immediately becomes a real contender. There’s Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, with Apple Airplay and Google Cast baked in too. It’s also a punchy, detailed and respectably dynamic listen, can play very loudly indeed if you so desire, and has a definite and well-defined sensation of height to its sound. You’ll need to be into the EQ settings to get treble response balanced out and calmed down, but overall this is an upfront, energetic but not remotely unsubtle performer that deserves a place on even very short shortlists.
Latest Videos From
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker review: Price and release date
Launched May 15, 2026
$299 / £299 / AU$499 in black or white (the ‘sand’ finish is pricier)
The Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is on sale now, and in the United Kingdom it costs £299. Or, at least, it does in either of the black or ‘white smoke’ finishes. If you fancy the Bang & Olufsen-tastic ‘sand’ finish with its natural oak base, you’re looking at £349.
In America it sells for $299 / $349, while in Australia (where the ‘sand’ finish does not seem to be available), the going rate is AU$499.
At this price, the Lifestyle Ultra Speakers’ chief rival in the Bluetooth arena is probably the slightly more expensive (at its regular price, anyway) JBL Xtreme 5. And that’s a five-star speaker, so competition is tough. That said, the Bose you’re reading about offers streaming over your home’s Wi-Fi network too, so in that category, your easy comparison is the Sonos Play.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker review: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Weight:
1.66 kg (3.6 lbs)
Dimensions:
Advertisement
18.5 x 12.1 x 16.8 cm
Battery life (quoted):
N/A (plug-in only)
Connectivity:
Advertisement
Bluetooth 5.3 with BLE; Wi-Fi (Google Cast; AirPlay; multi-room)
Drivers:
Two front-facing drivers ( 1x 3-inch woofer; 1x 1-inch tweeter), plus a 1.5-inch up-firing ‘twiddler’
Aux-in:
Advertisement
Yes
Charger port:
USB-C
Microphone:
Advertisement
Yes; built-in array
Waterproof rating:
Not rated
(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)
Advertisement
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker review: Features
Wi-Fi and Bluetooth wireless connectivity
Three-driver speaker array includes 38mm up-firing mid/high drive unit– 3.5mm analog input
In most respects, the feature-set of the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is somewhere between ‘very good’ and ‘very good indeed’ — the features we know about fall into one of those categories, anyway. This is Bose we’re dealing with, of course, which means there are no details whatsoever regarding some aspects of specification forthcoming.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
I’m going to go ahead and guess the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker uses Class D amplification, and that there’s an adequate amount of power on board (the ‘sound quality’ section will let you know how I’ve come to this particular conclusion).
What I know for sure is that there’s a three-driver array on board that’s in receipt of this mysterious amplification — a forward-facing 76mm mid/bass driver below a 25mm tweeter, with a 38mm mid/high driver angled up and out through the top of the cabinet.
As for what these drivers are made from, or the frequency response they’re capable of generating, well, your guess is as good as mine. Whatever the frequency response is, though, it’s bolstered by a rear-facing ‘QuietPort’ bass reflex port at the rear of the cabinet.
Advertisement
The port is towards the bottom of the back of the cabinet, just above a 3.5mm line-level analog input that constitutes the Bose’s only physical connectivity.
Wireless stuff is handled by dual-band wi-fi and Bluetooth — the latter is version 5.3 but is only compatible with the bog-standard SBC and AAC codecs, which is a shame when you consider the number of alternatives that are capable of local streaming to a higher standard. Still, Wi-Fi means Apple AirPlay 2, Google Cast and Spotify Connect are all available, with TIDAL Connect promised sooner rather than later.
(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker review: Design
184 x 121 x 167mm (HxWxD)
Choice of three finishes
Fixed grille
You make your own mind up when it comes to looks, of course, but for my money the shape of the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker makes a very pleasant change from all those cylindrical speakers that make up the bulk of the competition the Bose faces. The soft, rounded shape is miles ahead of the rather boxy stuff Bose has been turning out before now.
At 184 x 121 x 167mm (HxWxD) the proportions are pleasing, and the speaker is just about compact enough to work happily on a shelf (as long as there’s space above it for the up-firing driver to do its thing, of course). The standard of build and finish is basically impeccable, and there’s even a suggestion of tactility to the plastics Bose has used here. No matter which of the three available finishes you choose (the black of my sample, the ‘white smoke’ alternative that has more than a hint of grey about it, or the cost-option ‘sand’ alternative), the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker looks and feels the part.
Advertisement
The looks are nicely enhanced by the wraparound grille that covers a good portion of the front of the speaker. The fact that it’s notably proud of the main body makes it look very much like it can be detached — but it can’t, so don’t even try. No good can come of it.
A little more width and a little less high-end vigour wouldn’t go amiss
First things first: the Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker makes good use of its up-firing driver — dial in some ‘height’ in the control app, queue up a FLAC file of Idles’ Never Fight a Man with a Perm, let the ‘TrueSpatial’ processing do its thing, and you get a presentation that’s considerably taller than the cabinet from which it’s coming.
There’s nice even frequency response on display, too — the Bose digs respectably deep, hitting good and hard and the bottom of the frequency range, and the transitions to the midrange and into the highest frequencies is pretty smooth. While it goes out of way to ensure no part of the frequency range is over- or under-represented, the speaker does project the midrange just a little. The ‘V’ shape that results is more of a bump than a spike, though. Control of the bottom end is pretty tight, so the speaker has no real issues in expressing rhythms confidently. Detail levels are high at every stage. The Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is quite an insightful listen, and pays good attention to the more minor details in a recording — the fact that it presents quite a spacious and well-defined soundstage helps to make this obvious.
There’s a good sensation space to the overall sound, and certainly more than enough room for every participant in a recording to get the space in which to operate — but the left/right width of the presentation is quite curtailed in comparison to the height element. The result is a slightly narrow, notably tall sound that’s slightly counter-intuitive right until the moment you get used to it.
Advertisement
The tonal balance is, for the most part, pretty consistent; the Bose is a fairly neutral device in this respect. There’s a slight lack of substance to treble sounds compared to the rest of the frequency range, a tiny hint of toothiness that’s rather at odds with the robust way the rest of the range is presented. It’s nothing a moment or two examining your EQ options can’t mitigate, though.
Add in a reasonable facility with dynamics — the broad stuff about volume and intensity, and the more subtle dynamics of harmonic variation too — and the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker makes a pretty convincing case for itself. Unless, of course, you’re listening to content that simply doesn’t enjoy being forced into a spatial audio presentation. You can minimise the effect of the height channel in the app, but you can’t defeat the ‘TrueSpatial’ processing — and uncooperative recordings can sound just a touch vague where more compliant stuff is quite sharply focused.
As far as ‘setup’ is concerned, the Bose is either mercifully straightforward or rather underpowered — it depends on your point of view. In order to get up and running, it’s simply a question of finding a suitable position for the speaker (Bose will sell you a wall-mount of a dedicated stand, and there’s a thread in the base of the cabinet for use with third-party supports) and plugging it in. Then it’s simply a question of logging into wi-fi and to Amazon in order to activate the voice assistant. There’s no automatic room calibration routine available here (which is distinct from the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar that launched at the same time), so any tweaks to the performance of the speaker will have to be made in the Bose control app.
The app itself is clean and logical, and as well as some EQ adjustment (plus a slider to increase or decrease the sensation of sonic height) it’s where you can create a stereo pair with a second Lifestyle Ultra Speaker or incorporate your speaker into a home theatre system. Use the Google Home app, meanwhile, and a multiroom system using any and all compatible speakers can very easily be set up.There are some physical controls on the top of the speaker, too.
Advertisement
Capacitive buttons take care of play/pause, volume up/down, Bluetooth pairing, input selection, and waking this voice assistant — there’s a button to defeat the mic too, in case you don’t want Alexa+ to listen out for you.
This is the first non-Amazon product to take advantage of Alexa+ voice control and, while Amazon has kept some smart features for itself, this version works very well indeed. It’s alert to voice prompts, and is rapid in its responses to any questions or instructions you might have.
Setup & usability: 4.5 / 5
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker review: Value
Obviously there’s no shortage of wireless speakers at this sort of money, and some of them are very good indeed. Spending your money with Bose rather than with, say, brands as credible as Apple, Denon, Sonos or WiiM (to name just a few) does have upsides, though.
Obviously there’s the standard of build and finish, the very pleasant aesthetic and the many positives about the way the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker sounds. But there’s also the open and agnostic nature of its multiroom capability, as well as the welcome and well-implemented appearance of Alexa+ as a voice assistant to be factored in too. So while this is not your only choice, the value for money it offers means it should really be on your shortlist.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)
Should I buy the Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker?
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Advertisement
Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker review: Also consider
How I tested the Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker
I used the Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker on a kitchen worktop, a bookshelf, and a dedicated speaker stand. I used an iPhone 15 Pro to stream to it using Bluetooth (given the lack of worthwhile codec compatibility, there didn’t seem much point in getting anything better specified charged up), and I also used the iOS device to listen to Apple Music via AirPlay 2.
Get ready to navigate a free-for-all of social media handles.
WhatsApp
Earlier this week, Meta announced that its popular messaging platform WhatsApp would introduce usernames. These handles can replace people’s phone numbers, allowing them to keep that personal contact info more private if they wish. The username feature is not active yet, and it will see a global rollout over the coming months.
However, reservations for usernames are now open, and already there’s been a scramble for people to secure how they want to be known to their friends and family as well as to the app’s broader community. If you want to have the same tag on all your platforms, you’ll want to act quickly. Here’s what you need to know to lock down your WhatsApp username.
Advertisement
How to reserve a username
For now, the username reservations are only available on the mobile versions of WhatsApp. If you keep your app updated, you may receive a notification when usernames are available for you to reserve. If you think you missed the notification or just want to get to the menu on your own, here are the steps to take:
For iPhone
Tap the You button
Tap your profile
Pick “Create Username” or “Reserve Username” (The option may vary based on the stage of the rollout.)
Tap Save > Done
For Android
Tap the three-dot menu
Tap Settings
Tap your profile
Pick “Create Username” or “Reserve Username” (Again, what you see depends on what’s available to you.)
Tap Save > Done
Restrictions on WhatsApp usernames
As with most other social networks, your username must be unique. That means no matter how much you might want to be known as GlitterQueen4Eva, if someone else snatches that title first, you’ll need to come up with an alternative. The only way you might be lucky enough to grab an already-taken username is if that person opts to change what they have reserved, which can happen. Once a claimed handle has been changed or deleted, that name goes back up for grabs after 14 days. Meta hasn’t specified how many times a person will be allowed to change their handle, but a limit will be applied at some point.
Advertisement
In the above menus, if you don’t want to create a new ID for yourself, you’ll see an option to use your same username from Facebook or Instagram. Assuming nobody else has already snagged it, you can lock that name down. You may want to go with an original name for WhatsApp if privacy is your goal for a username.
In more practical terms, a username must be between three and 35 characters. They can contain lowercase letters, numbers, underscores and periods. You won’t be allowed to have a username of all numbers, and “restricted words or phrases” also won’t be permitted.
Advertisement
Use common sense to avoid scams
Meta has some measures planned to ensure that messages are coming from people you know, such as an authorization key for people contacting you by username for the first time. However, there are concerns that putting unverified names to accounts could increase the odds of scammers convincing their targets that they are somebody else. While Meta won’t be allowing just anyone to claim that they’re Beyoncé or Tim Cook, the company hasn’t explained if or how it will check for copycats. Although it’s safe to assume the real Taylor Swift won’t suddenly message you desperate for money, social media scams have cost unsuspecting people billions of dollars in the US alone.
Meta is already facing pushback against the global rollout in India. Reuters reported that the Indian government is calling for Meta to freeze the rollout until it can provide additional justifications for the feature and how the company will combat the elevated risks of fraud. India is the largest market for WhatsApp with more than 500 million users.
Opera has introduced Paste Protect, a security feature designed to block ClickFix-style attacks that trick users into executing malicious commands through social engineering.
ClickFix is a widely used technique where victims are deceived into copying dangerous code or commands to the clipboard and then executing them in the command-line interface.
The commands execute with the user’s privileges, bypassing existing security defenses, and many times lead to the delivery of information-stealer malware.
The method is to popular with threat actors that Apple recently introduced a security feature designed specifically to detect risky pastes in the Terminal and block them before alerting the user.
Advertisement
Opera’s approach with Paste Protect is similar: it blocks harmful commands before they are copied to the browser clipboard.
The new security mechanism leverages Hijack protection, introduced in 2021, which can detect attempts from external applications to replace copied content (e.g., URLs or bank account numbers) with malicious alternatives, as well as a new component called Injection protection.
Injection protection blocks potentially harmful commands before they reach the clipboard, regardless if the action is initiated by the user or a website they visit.
Opera says it uses platform-specific detection rules to scan copied content for patterns commonly associated with malicious scripts and commands, supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Advertisement
When Paste Protect detects suspicious clipboard content, it blocks the copy operation, displays a warning, and shows a red security indicator in the browser’s address bar.
“If a potential threat is detected, the copy action is automatically blocked,” describes Opera.
“You’ll see a popup explaining what happened, and a red warning icon will appear in the address bar.”
In such cases, users can view the first 120 characters of the blocked script, and they can approve the process of copying it after a 5-second timeout.
Advertisement
Viewing the script content Source: Opera
Users will also have the option to create allow-lists with trusted websites to minimize the friction from repeated blocks by Opera’s new security system.
“If you really know what you’re doing, for example if you’re a developer who regularly copies scripts or commands from trusted sources like GitHub, you can also set trusted websites where it’s allowed to copy scripts by selecting “Always allow from this site” in the popup,” explained Opera.
Paste Protect is enabled by default in the latest Opera release, and users can manage it through Settings → Privacy & Security → Paste Protect.
As a general recommendation, users should avoid executing commands they found online that they don’t fully understand and treat all such prompts with suspicion.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login