The U.S. military launched airstrikes Sunday targeting Iran‘s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard to retaliate for the killing of American troops in Jordan, further widening the crossfire between the nations as they fight over Strait of Hormuz.

The strikes, now part of a weeklong campaign that has seen Iran strike U.S.-allied countries across the Middle East, comes as an interim deal seeking to find an end to the Iran war has collapsed.

The U.S. has targeted bridges, electrical facilities and other targets in Iran, and Tehran has retaliated by hitting power and desalination plants in Kuwait, threatening daily life in that small, oil-rich desert nation. Iran also has stepped up its threats to further expand the strikes, drawing a warning overnight from the United Arab Emirates, home to Abu Dhabi and Dubai.

Latest U.S. strikes come after troops killed

The U.S. military’s Central Command in its statement also said it hit “Iranian military coastal surveillance and air defense facilities, maritime capabilities and missile and drone storage sites.” It also said for the first time it specifically targeting the Guard, a key power base in Iran’s theocracy that controls its ballistic missile arsenal.

Footage released by the U.S. military appeared to show strikes carried out by fighter jets and by Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from sea. One target site appeared to be in a valley of a mountainous region. The Guard often has missile bases and other military equipment tucked into mountain ranges.

Iran has provided no overall information on its materiel losses in the American campaign, which now is in its eighth day as the nations vie over control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which a fifth of all oil and natural gas traded passes in peacetime.

An Iranian attack on a base in Jordan killed two American service members, left one missing and four requiring hospitalization, the U.S. military said.

Since the war began, 16 U.S. service members have been killed and over 430 wounded.

Iranian authorities said Saturday that at least 50 people have been killed and more than 500 wounded in the latest U.S. strikes.

Will Smith unveiled a bold new look when he surfaced solo in Monaco this week, revealing he has shaved his head completely bald.

The 57-year-old’s exposed pate gleamed in the sun as he attended the E1 Series Monaco Grand Prix, an all-electronic boat-racing tournament.

Will, who owns a team called Westbrook Racing by Visit Angola that is competing in the event, grinned and flashed a peace sign as he strolled into the paddock.

He posed for pictures with such high-flyers as Monaco’s reigning Prince Albert and Spanish businessman Alejandro Agag, the founder and chairman of E1.

His sunny display of bonhomie comes weeks after Will’s fans lambasted his wife Jada Pinkett Smith online, taking her to task for an alleged ‘toxic’ gesture she made towards him as he signed autographs in Paris.

Jada and Will married in 1997 and separated in 2016 but are in an unconventional ‘life partnership’ and are reported to be living together again.

The Daily Mail has contacted Will and Jada’s representatives for comment. 

He posed for pictures with such high-flyers as Monaco’s reigning Prince Albert and Spanish businessman Alejandro Agag, the founder and chairman of E1

A viral clip showed the family heading to a car, before Oscar-winner Will stops to sign autographs for a plethora of waiting fans.

A somber Jada, who was following behind and holding onto Will’s arm, was filmed placing her hand on her husband’s back, moving past him and swiftly walking off in the opposite direction.

She then cracked a smile and turned back briefly as photographers called her name.

The clip was posted online with the caption claiming, ‘Jada Pinkett shoved Will Smith aside while he was signing autographs for fans and walked away like he was a complete stranger.’

Fans erupted in the comment section writing, ‘I still don’t know what secret she has of Will that has made him to still stick with her This is a woman that detests you

‘Shoving him aside mid-autograph like that felt unnecessarily harsh.

‘Loser behavior. She needs to get over Tupac and stop cucking Will.

‘This relationship is toxic…simply put…if you have no respect for your spouse (Jada), then move on…can’t you do bad by yourself…

‘And he slapped a close friend on stage for her,

‘She hates he gets all the attention.’

Others defended Pinkett, adding, ‘She touched him, as she passed. Like an acknowledgement. No shoving.

It comes after Will’s fans turned on Jada over an alleged ‘toxic’ gesture she made towards the actor as he signed autographs in Paris last month

‘No woman could ever hate that guy. He has a big heart.

Another wrote, ‘She didn’t shove him to the side at all, nor she ignored him like a stranger considering she’s following her daughter.’

The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for the pair for comment and has yet to hear back.

Aside from this Paris trip, the last time they were spotted together in public was for a family dinner in early June, their first joint appearance in six months.

The pair were spotted at Nobu Malibu in California with Smith’s mother Caroline as well as Jaden and Smith’s son Trey, 33.

The couple remain legally married since their wedding in 1997, but have been famously living separate lives in an unconventional ‘life partnership’ since 2016.

Last month, it was revealed that Will is set to star in his first non-franchise film in years after signing on to star in Supermax.

The film follows ‘two FBI agents investigating a murder that has taken place in the world’s most secure prison,’ and production is expected to begin in August, before the movie will be released for streaming, according to Deadline.

He will be playing one of the lead FBI agents, and casting for the female counterpart is reportedly still in progress.

Jada revealed in 2023 that she and Smith separated in 2016 – but have not taken steps to officially divorce.

They tied the knot in 1997, but in October 2023 Jada spoke about their separation during an interview with Hoda Kotb on Today.

She explained: ‘By the time we got to 2016, we were just exhausted with trying. I think we were both still stuck in our fantasy of what we thought the other person should be.’

The actress – who first crossed paths with Smith on set of The Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air in the mid-90s – also previously shared that she had an affair with singer August Alsina in 2020.

Smith and Pinkett posed with their daughter Willow in a rare family outing to support their son Jaden at the Christian Louboutin show during Men’s Paris Fashion Week on Wednesday night 

Advertisement

However, Jada expressed that she has never been able to go through a legal divorce with Smith.

‘I made a promise that there will never be a reason for us to get a divorce. We will work through whatever. And I just haven’t been able to break that promise.’

Hoda then questioned the actress, ‘But you still live separately?’ which prompted Jada to confirm that she and Smith ‘live separately.’

Last year in January, a source gave an update to People on the status of their relationship.

‘Call it what you want. They are living their own lives but haven’t completely severed ties,’ the insider said.

A separate source also told the outlet that the pair ‘are still together’ but ‘have had separate homes for years.’

Last year, it was revealed that the Hollywood duo reunited for a new business venture amid the actor’s attempts to relaunch his career after the viral Oscars slap.

Their entertainment company Westbrook signed a first-look deal with Paramount to create new theatrical films, hinting at the actor’s gradual return to Hollywood.

Will has been largely frozen out of the industry since he slapped Chris Rock at the Academy Awards, but is now expected to star in projects developed under the partnership, while Pinkett will take on producing roles.

Jada’s marriage to Will previously came under blistering public scrutiny in 2020, when she interviewed him on her chat show Red Table Talk about an ‘entanglement’ she had four years earlier with Alsina, who is 21 years her junior.

Her split from Will happened in the same year that she had the affair with Alsina.

Jada confirmed that she was in an ‘entanglement’ with Alsina – but insisted that she and Will were separated at the time.

‘We were over,’ she said to Will on the episode. ‘From there, as time went on, I got into a different kind of entanglement with August.’

However, the pair denied Alsina’s claim that Smith had given him permission to pursue the relationship with Jada.

There is no doubting Thomas. At least, that is, if you are Thomas.

For Tuchel, this absurdly bi-polar victory will be vindication, silencing the boos that tarnished his name before kick-off and the chorus of criticism that has followed him since Wednesday’s semi-final defeat by Argentina. He has delivered England’s best World Cup finish since 1966. Not quite the second star he promised, but a first bronze medal. With the German, it will always be his way or the freeway.

But for those who have formed that mass choir of inspection in recent days, they too will see this as justification. Look what happens when you attack a lead rather than defend it, Thomas? For them, there will be regret. There will be anger, even, at a 6-4 win over the tournament favourites. They will also point to England’s second-half collapse as evidence of tactical cowardice and an inevitable retreat. That is what this flash referendum on the country’s head coach has caused amid the fallout of Argentina.

Tuchel called the split among supporters ’50-50’ on the eve of the game, an interpretation that was both favourable and naive. When his appearance on the big screen stirred jeers from a Miami crowd of far more white than blue, it would have stung.

But the response of his team was louder still, and that moved both the manager and his assistant Anthony Barry. At half-time, with the score at a barely believable 4-0 to England, Barry said: ‘I can’t find the words about how proud I am of those players. We’re playing a game with broken hearts, 11 lads with broken hearts.

‘I’ve seen them in the hotel in the last few days with broken hearts. The cynics will say it’s too late but we still play against a world-class opponent and I’m so proud of the boys.’

After defeat to Argentina on Wednesday, England competed with ‘broken hearts’ to claim third place in Miami

Kylian Mbappe was unable to help France end on a high in an eye-popping end to both nations’ World Cup journey

The cynics will say it is too late. Where was this bravery when it was needed at 1-0 up in Atlanta? Where was Bukayo Saka against Argentina? Here he was sending Theo Hernandez for the baguettes every time he got the ball. So much so, the full-back was hooked at half-time. Saka had scored twice by then. Come the end, he had a hat-trick. Individually and collectively, England were inspired. At least for 45 minutes they were.

We had, mistakenly, thought that Tuchel’s performance in his pre-match press conference would be more significant than anything that played out on the pitch. There, we got an insight into his thinking having had time to reflect on Argentina. And his thinking was exactly the same as it was in the immediate aftermath – England’s exit was not on him. Yes, he would take responsibility, but he was not responsible. There is a subtle difference, yet it is one that would have landed like a sledgehammer in the dressing-room. After parking the bus in Atlanta, this felt like he was chucking his players under it.

Tuchel’s subsequent team selection had an uneasy whiff of self-preservation. Seven changes and no Harry Kane or Jude Bellingham. Surely we could not criticise him if the reserves did not perform? France had Kylian Mbappe and Michael Olise in their XI.

England’s start, then, was a shock. They played with freedom, adventure and precision. Goodness, they were brave on the ball. When they took the lead in the third minute, it was overdue, such was the purpose with which they began.

Declan Rice intercepted a ball on halfway and, when France’s efforts to recover the situation amounted to nothing more than a Gallic shrug, the midfielder took that as an invitation. He drove into the space in front of him, composed himself 25 yards out and slammed into the bottom corner.

Thomas Tuchel received heaping criticisms after defeat to Argentina and was somewhat subdued in Miami

Advertisement

Didier Deschamps oversaw his last ever match in the France dugout but could not see out a final win

Declan Rice was the first name on the scoresheet just minutes after the match kicked off

Mbappe did at least help bolster his Golden Boot credentials by establishing a two-goal lead to contender Lionel Messi

Jude Bellingham was a later substitute and the final scorer as England closed their World Cup chapter Stateside

Advertisement

What to do now? Bring on Dan Burn? Switch to five at the back? There were only 87 minutes to see out. No, England went for a second. They puffed out their chests, gloved up and sought to land another blow. Quick learners, this lot.

Marcus Rashford saw a shot deflected, likewise Saka, who also had a goal disallowed for offside. There were chances at the other end – Dean Henderson saved well from Ryan Cherki – but there would have been France opportunities, too, had England sat back. Instead, here they were, on their feet and marching forward.

In the 18th minute, Rice delivered teasingly from a corner, in a way he had not done since the opening game, and Ezri Konsa flashed a header into the far corner. There were two more before the break and neither goal was at all a surprise. Rashford teed up Saka to finish after the pair burst in behind and Saka rolled an easy fourth after being sprung clear by Eberechi Eze.

Never did we know, however, how dangerous a 4-0 scoreline can be. From the start of the second half, seemingly without instruction from Tuchel, England’s back four set up camp in their own penalty. And so came the invaders.

Mbappe ran away from Konsa to collect an Olise pass for 4-1. Mbappe turned provider when Bradley Barcola escaped Jarell Quansah for 4-2. Mbappe then finished after France knitted passes around a ragged England, and all of this before the 67th-minute drinks break. At 4-3, you could hear the knives sharpening from across the Atlantic.

But England reached into their own cutlery draw and found a blade of their own. Djed Spence charged into the area in the 86th minute and was tripped by Malo Gusto. Saka stepped up to slot home from the penalty spot for his hat-trick. Ousmane Dembele then smashed a French fourth before Bellingham danced through the goalmouth for England’s sixth. With that, the World Cup wooden spoon was theirs.

Tuchel will likely use it to bat away the doubters.

Located in Sunderland, the centre will close permanently on July 31, but not before one final showcase.

Titled ‘Conclusion’, the exhibition will feature work by MA Glass and Ceramics students from the University of Sunderland.

We Were Once Strangers Too, by Kerry Roffe. (Image: National Glass Centre)

Since opening in 1998, the National Glass Centre has played a key role in placing the UK on the global stage of studio glass and contemporary craft.

It has also supported academic excellence through its partnership with the University of Sunderland.

Conclusion will reflect the centre’s legacy by showcasing the calibre of artists it has nurtured over the years.

A spokesperson for the MA cohort said: “Exhibiting during the National Glass Centre’s final week is a profoundly bittersweet privilege.

“Our work represents the culmination of intense research and physical mastery, developed within a space that has inspired some of the world’s greatest glass artists.

“While we mourn the loss of this remarkable building, our exhibition is a testament to the enduring strength and future of the medium.”

The exhibition will be the centre’s final public event before it closes at 3pm on Friday, July 31.

The exhibition will also highlight urgent themes of identity, memory, displacement, and contemporary material innovation through the mediums of glass and ceramics.

The centre’s closure marks the end of nearly three decades of artistic and educational influence in the glass sector.

Andy Burnham has no mandate for his ‘back-to-the-1970s’ Left-wing policies – with voters demanding he call a general election, an exclusive Mail on Sunday poll has found.

Mr Burnham will walk into Downing Street on Monday pledging to drag Britain back to the pre-Thatcher era with ‘distinctively Labour‘ policies such as wealth taxes to hammer middle-class families. 

But, according to the MoS survey, 47 per cent of people think that Mr Burnham – who was anointed as Labour leader without a contest – should call an election to legitimise his agenda. A total of 31 per cent disagree.

The polling by Find Out Now also shows that only 18 per cent of voters think Mr Burnham should repair the public finances by increasing taxes, while 55 per cent say he should cut public spending instead. 

The results come as Mr Burnham’s embryonic administration is already descending into chaos and in-fighting over his first Cabinet appointments.

In other developments: 

• Mr Burnham was preparing to order new oil and gas drilling in the North Sea in response to the energy pressures caused by the Iran War – despite the previous Net Zero objections from Energy Secretary Ed Miliband. 
• Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded Mr Burnham a ‘people pleaser’ who did not want to face proper scrutiny, telling the BBC: ‘The job is not a popularity contest, it is making the lives of all of the people outside this building better’.
• A new analysis of Mr Burnham’s proposed mansion tax on homes worth more than £1.5 million would leave families in the South of England facing a bill of £800 million, with 60 per cent of the total tax burden falling on properties in London and just 1 per cent on Mr Burnham’s beloved Manchester. 
• Mr Burnham’s allies accused Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood of trying to ‘brief herself into the job’ of Chancellor ahead of the previous favourite, Mr Miliband.
• The MoS was told that security experts had warned Mr Burnham could not live in his family home when working from the proposed No 10 North without extensive safety enhancements. 
• Mr Burnham pledged to scrap the Starmer government’s Digital ID programme.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded Mr Burnham a ‘people pleaser’ who did not want to face proper scrutiny

Advertisement

A poll for the Mail on Sunday has revealed that 47 per cent of people think that Mr Burnham – who was anointed as Labour leader without a contest – should call an election to legitimise his agenda

The expected announcement on North Sea drilling would be part of a raft of new policy measures, including public control of water and energy companies, a fresh council house-building programme, cuts to energy bills and bus fares and reform of social care – which would have to be paid for through wealth or death taxes.

Mr Burnham vowed in his coronation speech on Friday to build a ‘new politics’ and ‘take back power from Westminster’ on the grounds that Britain had taken a series of ‘wrong turns in the 1980s’ under Margaret Thatcher.

But Labour MPs worry that he will struggle to force through reforms without getting the explicit backing of voters.

One said: ‘He hasn’t got a mandate. The pressure will come on him to go for an early election – not straight away, but next year.

‘He will have to make some pretty tough decisions, and he hasn’t got a mandate. You can’t promise the biggest change in history and not have a mandate.’

The Conservatives dubbed Mr Burnham a ‘coronation chicken’ for dodging Parliamentary scrutiny until the Commons returns in September. Mrs Badenoch said: ‘He has not said what he’s going to do – it’s all airy-fairy stuff.’

Mr Burnham’s apparent refusal to let even key allies know who would be given Cabinet jobs was blamed for sowing increasing confusion in the party.

Mr Miliband was originally said to be ‘nailed on’ to become Chancellor, but subsequent reports have indicated Ms Mahmood would get that job instead. In that scenario, Mr Miliband would – according to some predictions – be compensated by getting Yvette Cooper’s current job of Foreign Secretary.

Sources close to the former Deputy PM Angela Rayner have stressed that she would need ‘some persuading’ to become Health Secretary 

Wes Streeting, Mr Burnham’s one-time rival for the party leadership, has been variously linked to a return to his old job as Health Secretary, a new one as Defence Secretary, or even Chancellor

However, the Foreign Office position has also been linked to Mr Miliband’s brother David, which would mark an unexpected return to British politics, and also involve him becoming a Labour peer.

Wes Streeting, Mr Burnham’s one-time rival for the party leadership, has been variously linked to a return to his old job as Health Secretary, a new one as Defence Secretary, or even Chancellor. 

To add to the confusion, former Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was on Saturday also said to be in line to be Health Secretary – partly because her former experience as a care worker could help Mr Burnham’s radical plans for a national care service.

The move would represent a dramatic comeback for Ms Rayner, who quit the Cabinet last year in a row over her tax affairs. 

But, sources close to Ms Rayner – who has been more strongly linked with a return to her former housing and local government brief – stressed that she would need ‘some persuading’ to become Health Secretary. They also insisted that she had not been offered such a job.

On Friday, Mr Burnham said he was still finalising his Cabinet choices. No senior politician has apparently yet been given a firm job offer.

One veteran Labour MP said: ‘Everyone’s so much in the dark that they keep bumping into each other!’

Senior Labour MP and former minister Graham Stringer told The Mail on Sunday: ‘If Andy Burnham is serious about making the scale of changes he promised on Friday, he will have to think about going to the country and getting his own mandate.’

He added: ‘Unifying the party is a noble aim but you cannot unify the party on a blank cheque.

‘You cannot take people with you if you do not tell them where they are going.’

In The Mixer’s World Cup special

Everything you need to know about the World Cup – England updates, the games to watch and stories you missed – in five minutes, at 1pm, every day.

Is the sugar in fruit the same as added sugar?

You will no doubt have heard that fruit is “full of sugar” and that it’s the same sugar that you find in cakes, chocolate and soft drinks. You may also have seen so-called health influencers claiming you should stay away from fruit, or at least limit your intake, for this reason.

But what is the reality? Is fruit sugar the same as added sugar and do they have the same impact on your body and your weight? A well-known heart surgeon is among those to have addressed the issue recently. Dr Jeremy London was asked if the two sugars are the same.

Dr London, who holds board certification in general surgery, vascular surgery and thoracic surgery, and frequently shares advice through social media and interviews, said: “Chemically, the sugar is identical. An apple has sugar, a glazed doughnut has sugar, but the way we metabolise those two things is completely different. An apple has fibre, it has water, polyphenols, antioxidants. These things slow the digestive process and affect how your body is processing the sugar.

“Now, when I say whole fruits, I do mean whole fruits, because with fruit juices and dried fruits you lose these components. Whole fruit is more satiating, calorie for calorie, than sugary drinks or processed sugar. In the end, sugar is sugar but what it comes with makes a tremendous difference.”

What is sugar?

Sugar is a type of carbohydrate that provides energy (as calories) from foods and drinks we consume. Without getting too technical, there are two subtypes of sugar: monosaccharides and disaccharides. The former include glucose, fructose and galactose, which are found naturally in fruit. The latter include lactose, which is found in dairy.

What’s the difference between fruit sugar and added sugar?

Harvard Medical School agrees with Dr London that “an increasingly important distinction among sugars as they pertain to health is whether they occur naturally in foods such as fruit, vegetables, and dairy, or whether they are added sugars (added to foods and beverages during manufacturing, processing, or preparation)”.

The biggest sources of added sugars in our diet are sugary (or soft) drinks (which have previously been labelled “liquid death” because of their impact on health), sweets and breakfast cereals. Many of these foods will fall into the category of ultra-processed foods, many of which come with little nutritional benefit alongside the added sugar. However, fruit comes with many different nutrients which have multiple positive health impacts and help guard against your risk of serious illnesses including heart disease and cancer.

Harvard Medical School explains: “Natural and added sugars are metabolised the same way in our bodies. But for most people, consuming natural sugars in foods such as fruit is not linked to negative health effects, since the amount of sugar tends to be modest and is ‘packaged’ with fibre and other healthful nutrients. On the other hand, our bodies do not need, or benefit from, eating added sugar.”

Why is added sugar bad for you?

Intake of added sugar has been associated with weight gain, which in turn is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. It also causes tooth decay. This does not mean you should avoid added sugar at all costs. It is fine in moderation. The NHS says added sugars “should not make up more than 5% of the energy (calories) you get from food and drink each day.” This means, for example, that adults should have no more than 30g of free sugars a day (roughly equivalent to seven sugar cubes).

What counts as added sugar?

The NHS does not count sugar found naturally in milk, fruit and vegetables as added sugars (which it calls “free” sugars). Added sugar includes the obvious, like white and brown sugar granules; sugar added during the processing of foods; honey and syrups; and fruit juices and smoothies. While people have long consumed fruit juice and smoothies believing them to be healthy, experts say the act of juicing reduces the fruit’s nutritional value and means the sugars are released into the blood quicker, causing blood spikes and inflammation. Some say drinking lots of fruit juice can harm the liver.

Does sugar cause cancer?

Another common health myth is that sugar causes cancer. But nutritionist Nichole Andrews explains that is not the case: “As a cancer dietician, let me clarify: sugar all on its own will not cause cancer [or] have your cancer grow quicker. If you have a diet high in sugar, you’re probably going to have excess calories… and then you’re going to gain weight, gain fat tissue and it’s the fat tissue that increases cancer risk.”

Only two foods are known to directly cause cancer and they are very common — you can read what they are here.

Man Utd played Wrexham in pre-season on Saturday afternoon and the club’s youngsters played in the second half.

Manchester United boss Michael Carrick was impressed by youngster Jacob Devaney in the defeat to Wrexham on Saturday. United began their pre-season schedule against the Welsh club and Carrick made wholesale changes at half-time.

The senior players were replaced by an academy XI for the second half. Devaney played at centre-back and emerged with his reputation enhanced considering his natural position is midfield.

The 19-year-old spent the second half of last season on loan with St Mirren. First loans can be challenging for young players, but Devaney excelled during his time in Scotland.

St Mirren maintained their Scottish top-flight status and Devaney started in both relegation play-off matches. That meant his time in Scotland ended with him having not started just two games.

Carrick liked what he saw from United’s youngsters against Wrexham, but he singled out Devaney for praise. “I was really pleased with the second-half team,” he told MUTV.

“I thought they controlled the game really well against a team that’s not easy to play against, and makes you work for it, and they can play long into.

“I thought that, in general, the boys took responsibility and showed their quality. Again, that final bit of trying to break down a lot of bodies behind the ball, at this stage of pre-season it’s not easy to find that sharpness. I think they can really be proud of themselves.

“JD playing centre-half, it’s not natural to him, he’s played there a little bit, but not a lot and I thought he did ever so well.

“He had a really successful few months up there [in Scotland] and it was good to see him kind of take that next step. And you could see today the confidence and the assurance in his game, even though he was playing a slightly different position.

“He was vocal, he was commanding and, yeah, I liked a lot of what he did there.”

Tyler Fletcher captained the youthful United team in the second half. The young midfielder received a late call-up to Scotland’s squad for the World Cup, but he has already reported back to Carrington for pre-season.

“He’s had an eventful three or four months, really,” said Carrick. “He had a couple of weeks off [after the World Cup]. He didn’t want long off. He wanted to get back into it, and again, I think he stepped into the game and took that responsibility. He led the team in the second half really well.”

Glasgow Airport has issued guidance for travelling parents

Glasgow Airport has provided guidance for travellers who require breastfeeding facilities prior to departure or after they have landed.

The official Glasgow Airport website emphasises that breastfeeding is permitted throughout the premises. It states: “Breastfeeding is welcome throughout the terminal, but if you’d prefer a private space, there’s a dedicated breastfeeding area in the Baby Room.”

The airport notes that further breastfeeding facilities can be found at gates 1-3. Should you require a peaceful environment for yourself and your child, a Baby Room is located next to Gate 16.

These facilities feature:

• Bottle warmers
• Changing stations
• Comfy seating

Remember the 100ml rule

Outlining various security procedures and reiterating the 100ml restriction, the airport acknowledges that navigating security “can be daunting” and stressful, particularly when travelling with youngsters.

To assist passengers, it has compiled “tips to make the experience as seamless as possible”.

The airport recommends:

• Make sure liquids are under 100ml before reaching the scanner, however it is no longer required to place them in a clear plastic. There are no limits for powder formula and oversized liquids (more than 100ml) such as food pouches/specialist baby milk etc are allowed through security
• Do not bring formula or water in flasks that are plastic or metal. Nuby RapidCool flasks are permitted to be carried through security, but must be empty.
• Only carry what you need for the journey. You may be asked to open containers and taste the contents of infant or baby food that you bring with you.

• Keep baby wipes, dummies and teethers handy.
• Pushchairs can remain fully built (but empty) and can be pushed through the other side of the security gate as directed by the guard.
• Use the Priority Security lane for a faster and easier experience. Prices start at £6.99. Passengers under 3 can go through Priority Security free of charge when accompanied by a paying adult.