Sarah James
Research Analyst

Hello, everyone, and welcome to today’s webinar. My name is Sarah James, and I lead the Tech, Media and Telecom News team within S&P Global Market Intelligence. It is my pleasure to moderate today’s webinar, Orbit as the Next Data Frontier: Capital Flows, Risks and Realities.

Before I introduce my guests, a few housekeeping items. We recognize that the topic of today’s webinar is of great interest, and we want this to be an interactive session and encourage you to submit questions for discussion. At the bottom of your screen, you will see a row of widget icons. These icons will allow you to interact with us throughout the session. I would like to point out the Q&A widget, which can be used to submit questions to the panelists as well as the survey widget. Please take time to fill out our short survey after the webinar. We really value your insight. The webinar is being recorded and an on-demand version will be available shortly after we conclude. If you encounter technical issues during the program, please try refreshing your browser. If issues persist, please use the Q&A widget to contact us and a member from our technical team will assist you.

Now it’s my pleasure to introduce today’s panel. I’ll begin with my colleague, John Fletcher, a senior analyst with S&P Global Market Intelligence to kick in. John leads the Americas research team for broadband, multichannel video and mobile with a focus on how the U.S. can close the broadband digital divide. Just as a hint, LEO satellites are

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on Monday said it reached a settlement that it would pay an estimated $5.5 billion to settle tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging its baby powder and talc products cause ovarian cancer, which could end years of litigation on the subject.

The company said the proposed settlement would cover about 76,000 claims – including those that have been consolidated in federal court in New Jersey and related cases in state court – to cover nearly all the outstanding claims against J&J.

J&J previously settled most of the cases alleging its talc contained asbestos and caused mesothelioma.

The deal was confirmed by plaintiffs’ law firms on Monday, saying it was a good resolution after a decade-long court battle. The deal has to be accepted by 95% of the ovarian cancer claimants in state or federal court before it becomes final.

JOHNSON & JOHNSON CEO CREDITS TRUMP TAX POLICY FOR $55B US INVESTMENT PUSH, INCLUDING $1B IN FLORIDA

Johnson & Johnson announced a deal to settle talc powder lawsuits. (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)

J&J denied wrongdoing in its announcement of the settlement, saying that the plaintiffs weren’t able to prove their claims that the talc products caused cancer cases and that the settlement is a way of efficiently ending the litigation.

“While we are confident the company would ultimately have prevailed with further litigation, as it has in the vast majority of cases tried to date, this resolution allows the company to put this matter behind it and remain focused on its mission to develop medicines and devices that save lives,” said Erik Haas, worldwide VP of litigation at Johnson & Johnson.

The company expects to pay out $3 billion in 2027 and make further payments in 2028, though the deal could be worth more depending on how many people participate in the settlement.

JOHNSON & JOHNSON TO INVEST $1B IN PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURING FACILITY

Chris Seeger, an attorney who represents about 2,500 clients with talc claims and helped negotiate the settlement, said J&J could ultimately pay $7 billion or more as the settlement doesn’t cap the total payout and rather assigns specific values to qualifying ovarian cancer claims.

Seeger told Reuters in an interview that the plaintiffs “got a fair settlement, and our clients are going to be happy with it.”

The settlement comes after J&J secured a series of courtroom victories, including in individual trials, moves to disqualify plaintiffs’ lawyers and rulings against experts used by plaintiffs. The company won a significant court victory last week when a federal judge cast doubt on individual plaintiffs’ ability to prove that talc specifically caused their ovarian cancer.

TEXAS AG SUES KENVUE, J&J OVER ‘DECEPTIVELY MARKETING’ TYLENOL TO PREGNANT WOMEN

Johnson & Johnson has denied that its talc products caused cancer and said the settlement is a way to end the litigation. (Cristina Arias/Cover/Getty Images)

J&J has long denied that its talc products caused cancer, saying the products were safe and didn’t contain asbestos. It stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. in 2020 and switched to a cornstarch product.

The company attempted a legal strategy in which shell-company subsidiaries declared bankruptcy in an effort to settle the cases, though that proved unsuccessful.

It had a mixed record when talc cases went to trial, winning some outright and reducing verdicts on appeal, though it was hit with a multibillion-dollar verdict in a case brought by 22 women.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The new settlement only applies to existing claims and doesn’t address future lawsuits. The exclusion of future claims made more money available to current plaintiffs and also accelerated the payments so that all claims will be paid within 18 months instead of being spread out over more than a decade, Seeger said.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a new op-ed published on Tuesday that the rise of artificial intelligence should be used to empower all people rather than being centralized and controlled by a few institutions.

Zuckerberg wrote in The Wall Street Journal that people will be able to use superintelligence beyond human capacities in the next few years to create and discover new things, as well as drive economic growth and create opportunities. He noted that contrasts with some of the rhetoric from AI developers, and argued that diffusing AI access and its power broadly will lead to a better outcome.

“It is surprising that the discourse from many of those who are developing artificial intelligence is so filled with doom. I don’t understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future,” he wrote.

“The notion that AI is so dangerous that the only safe path is an extreme concentration of power seems dangerous. Historically, hoping that an absolute power will benevolently provide for humanity if sufficiently enlightened hasn’t led to safe or positive outcomes,” Zuckerberg explained.

ZUCKERBERG SAYS AI SHOULD EMPOWER PEOPLE, NOT REPLACE THEM, IN NEW META VISION

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerbreg argued that AI should be diffused rather than concentrated in a few institutions. ( John Nacion/Variety via Getty Images)

Zuckerberg said that there have been many transformative advances in technology throughout history that have stoked fears it would leave people behind, and that ultimately people enjoyed more prosperity, health and freedom as those technologies progressed.

“Putting power in people’s hands to pursue their own aspirations is how humanity has made the most progress. Novel ideas and major steps forward rarely originate from established institutions alone,” he wrote.

Zuckerberg alluded to how massive technological developments for humanity like flight, electricity and personal computing were advanced by individuals without deep ties to institutions. He said that as “everyone gains more powerful tools, each person will become more capable of shaping the future, not less.”

AI INNOVATION IS OUTPACING GOVERNANCE, LEAVING COMPANIES EXPOSED, EQUALAI WARNS

The rise of AI is leading to technological advances as well as investment in infrastructure, like new data centers. (Meta)

The Meta CEO acknowledged that there is a balance between the use of AI for automation and it being a tool that empowers innovation and enables people to expand skills and launch businesses, adding that if the balance leans toward automation it could have a negative impact on jobs and the economy.

“But if superintelligence is widely distributed, then I believe we will see more jobs in the future, not fewer. It will be significantly easier to start businesses without raising large amounts of capital.”

“I expect the economy will become more entrepreneurial with a greater number of people working at small businesses rather than larger companies,” he wrote.

PALANTIR CEO WARNS US AGAINST EUROPE’S AI REGULATION PATH, URGES TRUMP ADMIN TO NOT BAN OPEN MODELS

Zuckerberg said he thinks AI-powered superintelligence can bring about a positive future for humanity. (Reuters/Manuel Orbegozo)

Zuckerberg added that the development of superintelligence “will be the most profound technological advance we will see in our lifetimes.”

“Meta is committed to building with the principles of individual empowerment, invention and balance of power. The arc of human history has bent toward putting more power in people’s hands.” 

“If these values lead the way, then I am optimistic that we can build a positive future for everyone,” he wrote.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

eBay and some former executives have agreed to pay a couple $56m (£42m) after a campaign of harassment in retaliation for their online criticism of the firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, David and Ina Steiner, said they and eBay had reached a settlement stemming from the 2019 harassment they faced at the hands of several of the company’s executives, including eBay’s then chief executive.

The Steiners ran a website and newsletter EcommerceBytes that was at times critical of eBay.

A group of now former company executives ultimately pleaded guilty to sending the couple a costume mask covered in pigs blood, a book on surviving the death of a spouse, among other threatening actions.

Other actions, external perpetrated against the Steiners included eBay executives sending them a funeral wreath and harassing messages on Twitter (the social media platform now known as X). Some even paid visits to the couple’s Massachusetts home in a bid to install a tracking device on their car.

Seven former eBay executives pleaded guilty, external to the criminal charges between 2022 and 2024, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

An FBI agent involved in the investigation said in 2024 that the former executives’ actions were an “unprecedented, relentless, and over-the-top harassment campaign”.

eBay was also criminally charged and entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ and agreed to pay a fine of $3m.

While eBay is paying the couple the bulk of the settlement, including $6m to “various non-profit organizations”, Wenig is personally paying $1m toward the settlement.

Wenig left eBay in 2019. The same year, he had sent another eBay executive a text message regarding Ina Steiner which said: “Take her down.”

His contribution is set to go to an unnamed charity that is “dedicated to protecting First Amendment rights” and will be gifted in the name of Ina Steiner, according to the couple’s lawyers.

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right to freedom of speech.

Christopher Murphy of Scalli Murphy Law PC, which represented the Steiners in the case, said on Tuesday: “We believe this resolution sends a clear message that corporations and their executives cannot engage in this type of misconduct without facing significant consequences.”

eBay said: “What the Steiners were subjected to by former eBay employees in 2019 was wrong, reprehensible and should never have happened.”

The company condemned the former employees who ended up pleading guilty to criminal charges that led to the civil lawsuit, and admitted to an “unprofessional tone in internal communications”.

“This agreement is consistent with our commitment to fairly compensate the Steiners and fulfills our efforts to make things right,” eBay said on Tuesday.