from the and-by-“efficiencies”-we-mean-“destruction” dept

Quick background: the $8 billion FCC Universal Service Fund (USF) applies a small surcharge on traditional phone lines to fund broadband expansion to unserved rural homes, schools, and libraries (of which the U.S. has a lot thanks to rampant telecom monopolization).

While the USF, like all government programs, hasn’t been absent of fraud (usually at the hands of private companies), it’s generally done a lot of good for people stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide. The kind of boring, steady infrastructure work that doesn’t get headlines, or mentioned in books about “abundance.”

Enter Trumpism, which has been taking a merciless hatchet to absolutely any effort, anywhere across government, to try and ensure that Americans — whether rural Trump supporters, struggling school kids, or inner city urban residents — have affordable access to the internet.

The USF is technically overseen by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which has been tasked since 1998 with overseeing more than $9 billion in broadband subsidies annually. Now FCC boss Brendan Carr has announced a full review of the program, something he says is necessary for the sake of efficiency:

“In taking up this effort, we will improve oversight, reduce administrative costs, and increase
accountability of USAC and its Board of Directors. Our end goal is to ensure Americans receive the best bang for their buck on universal service spending—a commonsense win for government efficiency and accountability.”

This being Trumpism and Brendan Carr, there are obviously red flags in the way they’re going about this.

One being that the Trump administration’s version of “efficiency” and “accountability” — as we saw with DOGE — generally involves the mindless dismantling of useful programs by clowns who have very little functional human empathy or understanding of the things they’re destroying.

One other issue is that Carr historically has never meaningfully opposed giant telecom monopolies like AT&T on any policy battle of note, so the idea that he’s seriously going to root out fraud and abuse of the USF program is laughable. At best it’s likely that the program is retooled to ensure big telecom monopolies get more money in exchange for significantly less subsidy oversight.

Certain Trump Republicans had been pushing for the USF to be destroyed entirely, though that gambit was surprisingly scuttled by the Supreme Court last year. So now the name of the game for that sector of Trumpism will be to destroy the program while trying to make it seem like they’re not destroying the program. Especially when it comes to helping minority communities afford internet access.

Republicans have taken a hatchet to broadband affordability programs across the board, including killing the FCC’s Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), which provided a $30 broadband discount for low-income Americans — as well as killing a program that provided free Wi-Fi to rural school kids at no additional cost to taxpayers.

The Trump admin also illegally dismantled the Digital Equity Act, which was a bare-bones effort to stop race and class discrimination in broadband upgrades, hijacked billions in infrastructure bill broadband grants to the benefit of Elon Musk, and destroyed what’s left of U.S. federal consumer protection and corporate oversight, ensuring that U.S. ISPs face zero meaningful penalties should they rip you off.

You know, the real flyover country populism-type stuff everybody was clamoring for.

Filed Under: brendan carr, broadband, fcc, telecom, usf

The Federal Trade Commission is suing healthcare giant Hims & Hers for allegedly sharing its customers’ medical and healthcare information with advertisers and tech giants, like Meta and Snap, as well as for misleading consumers about its privacy practices.

The lawsuit is the federal consumer watchdog’s latest crackdown in recent years on healthcare companies that share sensitive information with outside companies without their customers’ knowledge. Hims & Hers, now a publicly traded company, provides prescription medication for sexual wellness, mental health conditions, weight loss, and other issues, and as such handles a large amount of sensitive patient data.

Companies typically try to learn more about their customers by installing code on their websites in order to share users’ information with advertisers, like Meta and Snap, which then use the data to provide information about who is visiting their websites and when. 

In its complaint filed in a California federal court, the FTC alleged that Hims & Hers placed pixel-sized trackers provided by Meta, Snap and other tech and advertising giants, including Microsoft, Pinterest, Reddit and X. These trackers, the FTC said, “captured and shared users’ health information,” contrary to Hims & Hers’ own privacy policy. The FCC alleges the company also used Meta’s tools to track users’ clicks and other actions that users took on its website.

The FTC also accused Hims & Hers of deceptive billing, and drawing up policies that allegedly made it difficult for customers to cancel, in violation of federal consumer protection laws.

Hims & Hers did not explicitly deny the FTC’ s claims in a statement on its website. The company claimed its privacy policy “makes clear” that users “may choose how their data is used,” and said it is “confident” in its position. Hims & Hers said it plans to defend against the FTC’s allegations.

The FTC has previously taken action against telehealth startup Cerebral, alcohol recovery provider Monument, as well as data giant GoodRx and therapy provider BetterHelp. These companies were similarly accused of sharing patients’ sensitive data through their websites to third-party tech giants and advertisers.

The use of pixel-sized trackers has previously revealed how people’s sensitive data gets shared with the companies who provide the code, highlighting how misconfigurations can result in unwanted data collection.

In 2024, TechCrunch found that the U.S. Postal Service was sharing logged-in users’ home addresses with Meta, LinkedIn and Snap by using their pixel tracking code. The USPS removed the code soon after.

Comparing Our Favorite Vacuum Cleaners

Honorable Mentions

Bissell PowerClean FurFinder for $260: This was our previous top pick for the best cordless vacuum. It got bumped though because the regular Bissell PowerClean ($200) is a touch cheaper since it doesn’t come with the FurFinder upholstery attachment, while Dyson and Ryobi’s vacuums have more powerful suction for pet hair.

Black and Decker Dustbuster Flex for $130: This is another cool handheld vacuum that’s great for cars or even indoor areas like staircases. It has a 4-foot hose, longer than most compact vacuums, and a handy little charging mount that the accessories clip into. Thank goodness for the charging mount, though, since the battery only lasts 15 minutes.

Dyson Spot+Scrub Ai Robot Vacuum for $1200: This is Dyson’s first robot vacuum that doubles as a mop, and it serves both purposes well. It uses the same app as other Dyson vacuums and can learn multiple floors of your home. The base station is large and unique, with a visible dustbin that’s certainly a callback to the clear dustbins of the brand’s cordless vacuums. Dyson says it has artificial intelligence to spot stains and scrub them away, but I couldn’t tell a difference and it didn’t spot the cherry stains I intentionally created. It’s also tall, so it was often bumping into cabinets and low furniture.

Dyson V8 Cyclone for $400: This is a new version of the long-favored Dyson V8, but I wasn’t super impressed when testing it side by side with the only slightly more expensive V10 Konical. It did a fine job and has 150 air watts of power, but I’d recommend the V10 over the V8 any day.

Dyson V10 Konical for $500: I expected to prefer the V8 Cyclone, but the V10 Konical did a better job vacuuming up debris in my tests, comes with a HEPA filter, and has a built-in light so you can better spot dust and dirt when using it on hard floors. When tested and scored against all of the new and current Dyson vacuums, the V10 Konical was in third place, ahead of both the V8 Cyclone and the V15 Detect. It’s a great buy if you want a Dyson vacuum but don’t want to manage multiple heads, and it will be compatible with Dyson’s base station that comes out later this year.

Dyson V15Detect for $846: There are a lot of Dyson vacuum models, and the older V15 Detect is a good choice if you want two vacuum heads included without spending close to a grand. There’s an option to upgrade and get a Submarine wet roller head if you want it to double as a mop. It performed solidly in testing against Dyson’s other vacuums, but wasn’t the best. I’d recommend looking for it on sale for under $700; anything higher and there’s no point in not buying the Gen5Detect or V16 Piston Animal instead.

Dyson PencilVac Fluffycones for $600: This is a new take on a stick vacuum with the motor and dustbin built into the slender handle. There’s both a Fluffycones version, which I tested, that has four fluffy cone-shaped rollers in the head, and a cheaper Fluffy version. I was impressed with the maneuverability of the PencilVac Fluffycones and often find myself grabbing it between runs of my robot vacuum to keep debris and cat litter under control. It’s also lightweight and easy to push, and it has a freestanding charging mount. But it’s a little pricey for being only for hard floors.

Ecovacs Deebot X11 Omnicyclone for $1100: If you want a newer robot vacuum, the Ecovacs Deebot X11 Omnicyclone has a unique design with no dust bag. Instead, it has a rounded canister like a Dyson or stick vacuum, circling the debris to keep it from tangling. It’s a great robot vacuum overall, especially if you don’t want to buy dust bags over and over.

Eufy X10 Pro Omni for $700: This was our previous top robot vacuum pick. It’s a well-priced option that can vacuum and mop, and has a solid 8,000 Pa of suction power. But Eufy does have a newer model that you can pick up for just a little more if you want a self-cleaning roller mop instead of roller pads, with almost double the suction power.

Roborock Saros 20 for $1,600: Roborock’s latest robot vacuum is overall pretty good, but WIRED reviewer Adrienne So noticed it left debris behind on her hard floors, specifically on the divider when it moved from her carpet onto hard flooring. This could be a fault of the super-high suction, which hits 36,000 Pa. There are a few other features she hoped would work better, too, including the AdaptiLift (which raises the vacuum up on uneven surfaces) and beta stain-detection feature. We’re in touch with Roborock about these issues.

Shark PowerDetect Cordless Vacuum for $418: This is the original PowerDetect vacuum I recommended, with 380 watts of power, three cleaning models, two accessories, and an option to upgrade to include a self-emptying vase station. It can bend to get under furniture and often outpaced Dyson vacuums in my tests, especially when cleaning up sand or cereal on carpet. I prefer the Shark PowerDetect Speed a little more since it’s cheaper and has more options for its base station, but either vacuum is a smart buy.

Tineco Pure One Station 5 for $459: If you want a cordless stick vacuum but don’t want to deal with emptying it all the time, this Tineco vacuum comes with a self-emptying docking station. You’ll eventually have to empty the station, but it’s a great bonus feature and keeps the vacuum from falling over around your home since it’s stored safely in the docking station.

Worx Cordless Cube Vacuum for $120: This adorable, cube-shaped vacuum is one of my favorite handhelds, and is my go-to for vacuuming the car since it’s so easy to hold. It can also store all of its accessories inside itself, and the hose is four feet long to reach your entire carpeted car trunk.

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

Bottom line: While Microsoft continues to ride the AI wave, Xbox continues to struggle. New CEO Asha Sharma recently began implementing plans for a radical course correction, but it is still too soon to predict their impact. The company’s fourth-quarter financial results for 2026 show a 10% fall in Xbox content and services and a 13% decline in hardware revenue, while Microsoft’s overall profits jumped by 31%.

While Xbox’s 13% YoY drop in hardware revenue is not as bad as last quarter’s 33% plummet, it still caps off a full year of uninterrupted declines. Price hikes and worrying PR surrounding the brand are likely the primary factors, and the situation is expected to worsen when Xbox Series S|X consoles become at least $100 more expensive starting in August.

Xbox content and services revenue also fell by 10% YoY this quarter, compared with a 5% decline last quarter, which Microsoft again attributed to strong performance during the same quarter last year. The company is likely still referring to titles such as Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 and Minecraft, but this past quarter saw the release of one of Microsoft’s most successful titles, Forza Horizon 6.

– ASHA (@asha_shar) July 29, 2026

During the Q4 earnings call, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella expressed hope for Xbox to return to profitability in fiscal year 2027. Asha Sharma, who replaced Phil Spencer as Xbox CEO in February, has already begun implementing changes to that end, some of which are controversial.

To boost hardware sales, the company is partially reversing its policy of releasing in-house titles, such as Gears of War E-Day, on rival platforms. Microsoft also confirmed a renewed push for major franchises such as Fallout and The Elder Scrolls. However, rolling layoffs affecting 3,200 positions this year and the loss of five game studios have drawn sharp criticism and sown doubts about future game development at Xbox.

Meanwhile, the AI boom continues to lift Microsoft’s overall fortunes. Revenue increased 18% YoY, and profits rose 31%, both in Q4 and for FY26 overall, mostly due to cloud and AI services. The company announced that Azure revenue exceeded $100 billion for the first time this year.

Although tech giants remain bullish on AI, the boom’s longevity remains unclear. Apple recently regained its status as the world’s most valuable company and joined the $5 trillion club, largely because it has kept AI at arm’s length, causing investors to see it as an island of stability.

AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D still tops plenty of gaming benchmarks against newer chips, and it has just dropped to one of its lowest prices yet.

That price is $339.99 at Amazon, down from its $449.00 list price, a saving of $109.01, or 24%, on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the chip our tech expert called nothing short of impressive in his review.