Connect with us

Business

Google Pulls Nano Banana 2 AI Image Tool From Earth Just One Day After Launch Over Fabricated Imagery

Published

on

Google Earth Flight Simulator Launches on Web Browsers Bringing Virtual

Google pulled a new artificial intelligence image-generation feature from Google Earth on Friday, just one day after launching it globally, after users demonstrated that the tool could be used to fabricate realistic-looking satellite-style imagery superimposed over real, named locations.

The feature, called “Create Image,” used Google’s Nano Banana 2 model, technically known as Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, to generate AI images grounded in actual satellite, aerial and 3D terrain data for any location a user selected within Google Earth’s web platform. Google framed the launch as a creative tool that could let users visualize how a historical landmark once looked, brainstorm urban planning concepts for a vacant lot, or preview real estate development ideas before construction began, distinguishing it from general-purpose AI image generators that start only from a blank text prompt rather than a real, mapped location.

The feature rolled out globally at no additional charge on Thursday, available exclusively through Google Earth’s web version at earth.google.com rather than through the mobile apps, which together account for more than 500 million downloads on the Google Play Store alone. Generated images were watermarked, both visibly and with an embedded invisible marker, and could only be saved within Google Earth projects, without the ability to be directly exported or shared outside the platform, according to Google’s developer documentation.

Those safeguards proved insufficient to prevent misuse once the tool became widely accessible. Digital investigator Henk van Ess demonstrated the feature’s potential for generating misleading content by producing images depicting refugees near the Mexican border, a nuclear facility in Iran, a fatal crash scene in Amsterdam, and a bomb crater near a hospital in Gaza, all superimposed onto real, identifiable map locations within Google Earth’s interface.

Advertisement

The specific interaction model underlying the tool, allowing users to type a text description and have the resulting AI-generated image dropped directly onto a real satellite map location, drew particularly sharp criticism given Google Earth’s established reputation as a widely trusted source of geospatial reference imagery. Journalists routinely use the platform to geolocate conflict footage and verify the authenticity of on-the-ground reporting, human rights investigators use it to corroborate witness accounts of specific events, and academics rely on it as a baseline dataset for geographic and historical research. Layering a generative AI tool directly inside that same interface effectively collapsed the visual distinction between genuine, recorded satellite imagery and synthetic, AI-fabricated imagery within a single trusted platform, a concern critics raised almost immediately after the feature’s rollout.

Google confirmed it was rolling back the feature after becoming aware of screenshots showing generated imagery that the company said appeared to violate its policies. The company said it plans to rebuild the tool with stronger safeguards before any future relaunch, though it has not provided a specific timeline for when a revised version might become available again.

Prior to the rollback, Google had highlighted a range of intended use cases for the tool through its official launch materials, including visualizing historical scenes at real-world landmarks, generating easy-to-read historical infographics tied to specific locations, and exploring conceptual redesigns of public spaces or vacant lots. The company positioned the feature as adding a new creative layer to Google Earth, transforming the platform from a tool that primarily shows users the world as it currently exists into one that also lets them imagine what a given location could become in the future.

Nano Banana 2 sits within a broader family of Google image-generation models of varying capability tiers. It occupies a mid-tier position between the lighter-weight Nano Banana 2 Lite, which can generate standalone images in roughly four seconds through Google’s developer API at a cost of $0.034 per image, and the more capable Nano Banana Pro, which Google has reserved for more complex, professional-grade image rendering tasks.

Advertisement

The rapid rollback comes just days after Google had separately touted the growing role of artificial intelligence within its broader product ecosystem, crediting AI tools with helping identify and fix significantly more bugs within its Chrome browser in June than the company had resolved across the prior two years combined, according to reporting on the company’s recent AI-related announcements.

The Google Earth incident adds to a broader, ongoing debate across the technology industry about how to responsibly deploy increasingly capable generative AI image tools within platforms that carry an established reputation for accuracy and trustworthiness. Watermarking and export restrictions, the two primary safeguards Google built into the initial version of the Nano Banana 2 Earth integration, proved insufficient on their own to prevent the creation of convincing, potentially misleading fabricated imagery tied to real, sensitive locations, underscoring the difficulty technology companies continue to face in balancing creative AI features against the risk of enabling visual misinformation.

With the feature now pulled less than 24 hours after its global debut, Google has not specified what additional guardrails it intends to implement before considering a future relaunch, leaving open questions about whether the underlying tension between creative flexibility and misinformation risk can be fully resolved for a feature integrated directly into one of the world’s most widely used and trusted geospatial reference platforms.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Brewers Trade Craig Yoho and Blake Perkins to Guardians for Catcher Bo Naylor, Pitcher Codi Heuer This Weekend

Published

on

Craig Yoho

The Milwaukee Brewers made their latest move ahead of Major League Baseball’s trade deadline Saturday, sending reliever Craig Yoho and outfielder Blake Perkins to the Cleveland Guardians in exchange for catcher Bo Naylor and pitcher Codi Heuer.

Brewers President of Baseball Operations Matt Arnold completed the deal early Saturday morning, adding another transaction to Milwaukee’s busy stretch of trade deadline activity with just a few days remaining before the deadline closes. The trade came as something of a surprise given that catcher had not previously been viewed as a position the Brewers needed to address, with veteran Gary Sánchez having served as the team’s backup catcher for the entirety of the season and posting a strong 118 OPS+ in that role. Sánchez has been particularly effective against left-handed pitching, hitting .274 with an .878 OPS in matchups against lefties this season.

Naylor, by contrast, has struggled offensively at the major league level this season, hitting .143 with a .438 OPS and a 23 OPS+. The 26-year-old was optioned to the minor leagues earlier this season and had accumulated just 84 at-bats at the big-league level before the trade. Despite his struggles this year, Naylor carries more than 1,000 career major league at-bats and has hit 40 career home runs, giving him a more extensive track record than his current-season numbers alone would suggest.

Given Naylor’s offensive struggles relative to Sánchez’s production this season, the trade initially appears to represent a downgrade at the position on paper. According to Curt Hogg of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the addition of Naylor could open the door for the Brewers to move Sánchez in a separate trade before the deadline passes, suggesting Saturday’s deal may be connected to broader roster maneuvering the front office has planned for the position rather than representing the full scope of Milwaukee’s catching plans for the stretch run.

Advertisement

The trade also included the departure of Perkins, who had clearly fallen out of favor within the organization over the course of the season. Perkins lost his spot on the major league roster on multiple occasions this year amid ongoing offensive struggles at the plate. He had retained some support from Brewers manager Pat Murphy despite those struggles, but with limited offensive production, Perkins had few remaining paths to consistent big-league playing time heading into the trade.

Perkins’s inclusion in the deal allowed the Brewers to also acquire Heuer, a journeyman relief pitcher who has posted largely mediocre results in his limited major league appearances this season, carrying a 4.66 ERA at the big-league level. Heuer has spent the majority of the current season pitching at the Triple-A level, where his performance has been notably stronger, posting a 3.46 ERA in that role.

Both Naylor and Heuer are being assigned to Triple-A Nashville upon joining the Brewers organization, meaning Milwaukee effectively traded two players who had been contributing directly to its major league roster depth in exchange for two players who will begin their tenure with the organization at the Triple-A level. That structure has left some analysts characterizing the trade as somewhat puzzling when viewed in isolation, since it does not appear likely to meaningfully upgrade Milwaukee’s current major league roster on its own. The deal is widely viewed as more likely a precursor to additional moves the Brewers front office plans to make before the trade deadline closes, rather than a standalone transaction intended to directly address an immediate roster need.

Saturday’s trade extends a busy stretch of activity for Milwaukee’s front office as the deadline approaches. The Brewers had previously acquired pitchers Lance McCullers Jr. and Colton Gordon in a trade with the Houston Astros earlier in July, adding to a series of moves aimed at bolstering the team’s roster ahead of the postseason push. Milwaukee entered the weekend with a strong 67-41 record, positioning the team among the league’s contenders as the deadline approaches.

Advertisement

Both Yoho and Perkins had spent time as part of Milwaukee’s major league roster depth this season, with Yoho working out of the bullpen and Perkins serving in an outfield role, before their departures as part of Saturday’s trade with Cleveland. Neither player had established themselves as a clear long-term fixture on the Brewers roster heading into the trade, a dynamic that likely factored into the front office’s willingness to include both players in the package sent to Cleveland in exchange for Naylor and Heuer.

With Milwaukee’s front office having already been active throughout the month of July and the trade deadline still several days away, additional moves from the Brewers front office remain a distinct possibility as the team continues working to reshape its roster ahead of the stretch run, particularly given the suggestion that Saturday’s acquisition of Naylor could set the stage for a separate trade involving Sánchez before the deadline period concludes.

Continue Reading

Business

Arcadis NV (ARCAY) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript