Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Yvette Cooper: It Has Been a Difficult Week

Published

on

Yvette Cooper: It Has Been a Difficult Week
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

CAAT condemns conviction of peaceful protest organisers as part of ongoing assault on civil liberties

Published

on

CAAT condemns conviction of peaceful protest organisers as part of ongoing assault on civil liberties

Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) has spoken out following the conviction of Palestine Solidarity Campaign director Ben Jamal and Stop the War Coalition vice-chair Chris Nineham. They were convicted on 1 April of public order offences at Westminster magistrates court. The charges related to a peaceful protest in January.

Additionally, district judge Daniel Sternberg convicted Jamal of ‘incitement’, claiming that his speech at the peaceful protest breached “lawfully imposed conditions”.

The Metropolitan police had originally allowed the 18 January protest to take place but then reversed its decision. It cited spurious claims of “cumulative impact” on Jewish Londoners. The reversal came after lobbying by pro-Israel individuals and groups, including the Jewish Leadership Council.

On the day of the illegal US-Israeli aggression on Iran, the Jewish Leadership Council expressed its support for the unprecedented bombing campaign, claiming it “will make the world a safer place.”

Advertisement

CAAT speaks out on political policing

CAAT notes that the conditions the Met imposed were far from lawful. They prohibited peaceful protesters from gathering outside the BBC’s office to protest its systematic editorialising in favour of Israel.

As Netpol pointed out in a recent report titled How Repression Became Routine, police – specifically, the Met – are exercising powers beyond or ahead of lawful authority. Cumulative disruption powers, for example, have yet to pass through parliament.

Moreover, in reflection of the government’s zeal for suppressing anti-genocide protest, police use of powers to restrict assemblies in 2024–25 rose by 230% across Britain.

As part of the trial against Jamal and Nineham, district judge Sternberg threw out a “no case to answer” defence. However, Sternberg curiously declined to give reasons for doing so.

Advertisement

The 18 January protest was designed to start or end at BBC headquarters in Portland Place to protest against the broadcaster’s coverage of the Israeli genocide in Gaza. The BBC’s systematic bias, which downplays Israeli crimes against humanity, while dehumanising its Palestinian victims, has provoked documented turmoil at the organisation.

CAAT notes that the zeal with which the police and Crown have pursued peaceful protesters demonstrating against the UK-backed Israeli genocide stands in contrast to its gross inaction against UK nationals serving in the Israeli Occupation Forces, as well as executives of companies providing weapons to Israel.

In February the Public Interest Law Centre, supported by CAAT, submitted a detailed complaint to Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command (SO15). This asked it to open a criminal investigation into four current and former British directors of Elbit Systems UK Ltd for possible complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Gaza. No response, or acknowledgement, has come from the Met.

A spokesperson for CAAT said:

Advertisement

As members of an anti-genocide movement proud to share its platform with Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham, we are dismayed at Westminster magistrate court’s decision to convict them in a trial that should never have taken place.

Jamal and Nineham should be feted for their service to humanity, and opposition to crimes against it. Yet, in this dire state of affairs, our government gets away with supporting Israel’s systematic slaughter of Palestinians, the ongoing theft of their land, and providing a steady stream of murder weapons, while prosecuting those protesting against it. The Met police’s failure to even acknowledge the Public Interest Law Centre complaint against Elbit directors, over possible complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Gaza, shows just how politicised the police has become.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Race Across The World Cast: Meet The Five Teams On The 2026 Series

Published

on

Race Across The World Cast: Meet The Five Teams On The 2026 Series

Race Across the World returns for its sixth series on Thursday night, with five new intrepid teams taking on the journey of a lifetime in the hopes of getting their hands on a hefty cash prize.

This time around, the pairs must race more than 12,000km across Europe and Asia, taking in the sights of Italy, Greece, Türkiye, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia. With no smartphones, internet access or bank cards, the duos are armed with nothing but the cash equivalent of flying the same route, in the hopes of reaching the finish point before their time or money runs out.

As fans get ready for the exciting launch show, here are those taking on the challenge of the most extreme race to date in this year’s series of Race Across The World…

Jo and Kush

Advertisement

Childhood best friends from Liverpool, Jo and Kush, are the youngest duo in the race, both aged just 19. Still living at home, and fresh from finishing their A-levels, the pair are taking on independence in the most extreme way.

Both at a crossroads in their lives, the two thought Race Across The World would be a great opportunity to travel before going to uni.

“When the opportunity came up, we thought it would be a fantastic experience and something we could look back on and learn from,” Kush said.

Though they may be young, they have some experience travelling, as Kush has spent three months backpacking through Thailand – although the idea of making their way across Europe and Asia without their phones will no doubt still come as a shock to the duo.

Jo and Kush hope their social skills and ability to talk to strangers will help them on this mammoth journey, although it sounds like they are far more concerned with enjoying new experiences than winning the competition.

Advertisement

“I believe hardship builds personality and this is a very niche but intense situation so coming out of the experience with a bit more maturity and different perspective on life – it’s not just Liverpool,” Kush said.

Katie and Harrison

Katie, a 21-year-old account manager, and her 23-year-old brother, finance assistant Harrison, hope their opposing personalities will help them during the race.

Harrison wanted to join the show to push himself and his sister out of their comfort zones. The competitive siblings have their eyes on the prize and think their money-management skills will help them cross the finish line first.

Their weakness? Harrison might want to blow their limited budget on food.

Advertisement

“I think mine will be hunger, or not even hunger but just wanting to eat,” he claimed when asked about his biggest challenge.

While competitive, neither sibling is very adventurous, so Race Across The World promises to broaden their perspective and build their confidence as travellers.

“The motivation isn’t the money at the end, it’s to try and live a different life for a couple of months and just experience everything, and if we can win it whilst doing it, that is great,” Harrison added.

Hilariously, one of the items Harrison brought on his journey was a list of Man United fixtures, so he knew when to ask people for the football scores on his travels.

Advertisement

Molly and Andrew

Junior doctor Molly wants to prove to her geography teacher dad, Andrew, that she’s more capable than he gives her credit for.

For Andrew, backpacking is a lifelong dream that the 54-year-old has never had the time or money to complete. While travelling on the cheap was his wife’s nightmare, he finally gets to live out his dream with his daughter.

Their strengths and weaknesses on this trip might be the same, as 23-year-old Molly is very sociable and chatty – but her dad worries that he might not be able to keep her quiet!

“I kind of just go and lead by directness, and I need to rein that in every now and then, but Molly is quite good at reining that in for me,” Andrew explained, but admitted that it can balance out his quiet personality.

Advertisement

He added: “I can sometimes get caught in my own world instead of externalising it which in some ways is good, but I need to work on it.”

While the duo are inexperienced travellers, they hope their competitive edge and strong father-daughter relationship will help them take the lead in the competition.

However, Molly does worry about being away from her beloved celebrity gossip and hair-dryer.

Puja and Roshni

Advertisement

Cousins Puja and Roshni spent their twenties building successful careers in London, but are looking for some adventure now they’re in their early 30s.

Puja, a big fan of Race Across The World, was inspired to sign up after hitting a career block and feeling like her life was passing her by too quickly.

“I think living in London and having a job, you kind of live your life in fast forward, and then before you know it, you’re 50 years old,” she admitted.

Doctor Puja had previously backpacked, and her software engineer cousin Roshni has also travelled around Cuba, so both were experienced at visiting a country without fancy hotels or pre-planned itineraries.

Because of their jobs, Puja and Roshni feel confident racing under pressure and think their strengths will be keeping to the tight budget and staying organised.

Advertisement

Although a win would be great for the cousins, the duo are more concerned with making the most of their time off, spending much-needed time together, and learning about new cultures.

Puja explained: “Being able to accomplish that and get to the end, I think is going to be a massive accomplishment and proof to both of us that we can pretty much do anything we set our mind to. The other bits of it are just like what we learn from local people, from different lifestyles, different cultures, and learning more about how life can be a lot slower than what we live at home.”

Mark and Margo

Lastly, there is the unlikely duo of 66-year-old Mark and his 59-year-old sister-in-law, Margo. The retired London-based architect and the Liverpudlian hypnotherapist have had a fractious relationship for the last four decades, but recently became close after the death of Margo’s sister and Mark’s wife.

Margo signed the pair up for Race Across The World to celebrate their late loved one.

Advertisement

“We’ve been through this experience with losing my big sister and him losing his wife,” she said. “It seemed like a celebratory thing that we could do together. This was a new journey that could be exciting and like a renewal.”

Both are adventurous and don’t believe in living life with limits, having interrailed in their youth, as well as skydived, hiked, and done… well… pretty much any other dangerous thing they could think of.

“There isn’t a limit on what we’d have a go at. We’re going to live as dangerously as they’ll allow us,” Margot revealed.

Mark and Margo admit they are in it to win it, with a track record of travelling the world, although the duo do admit they can get a little cranky when hungry and tired, and Mark fears he could crumble under pressure.

Advertisement

Race Across The World airs on Thursday nights at 8pm on BBC One.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Death over health in Trump’s America

Published

on

Death over health in Trump's America

On Wednesday 1 April, Donald Trump delivered one of the worst speeches of his career — and this was no April Fool’s.

The above is really just the tip of the iceberg too.

Advertisement

Bombs not babies

In the clip above, Trump starts talking about daycare but progresses to the national health insurance systems of Medicare and Medicaid (emphasis added):

the United States can’t take care of daycare. That has to be up to a state.

We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars.

We can’t take care of daycare.

You got to let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it too. They should pay. They have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it. And we could lower our taxes a little bit to them to make up for it.

Advertisement

But it’s not possible for us to take care of daycare. Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things. They can do it on a state basis. You can’t do it on a federal.

We have to take care of one thing, military protection.

We have to guard the country.

As most people now realise, the US isn’t ‘guarding the homeland’—it’s instead doing the opposite to other countries.

Advertisement

If America stopped waging forever wars, it could easily afford daycare and universal health coverage. It could probably afford to give everyone in the world healthcare with how much they spend on war (set to be $1.5tn by 2027).

Even the administration is starting to realise that its military endeavours aren’t money well spent:

Trump had more to say too.

Advertisement

Bad to worse

As the Majority Report’s Emma Vigeland sarcastically highlighted, Trump admitted that he basically likes anyone who sucks up to him—no matter how repellant they are (presumably he’s thinking about Benjamin Netanyahu):

Having failed to achieve any of his objectives in the Iran war, Trump is now asking his allies to clean up his mess:

Trump gave an idea of why the war has gone so badly:

Trump also did some race science:

This is the same guy who has repeatedly bragged about passing cognition tests because he thinks they’re testing his intelligence — not whether he has dementia.

Shocking but not unsurprising

While the things Trump says are constantly unprecedented, we’re at a point now where nothing really shocks.

Of course he’d launch a stupid war and then bail when it got too much.

Of course he’d be the politician to finally admit the US prioritises death over health.

Advertisement

Of course he’d go off on some racist tangent that has nothing to do with the speech at hand.

As grim as this all is, hopefully it makes Americans realise their country is not a force for good, and that this is a situation it can’t keep repeating.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Police scrap Race Action Plan

Published

on

Police scrap Race Action Plan

Five years after the implementation of the Police Race Action Plan (PRAP), progress has been patchy, slow, and all-too-easily reversed. Worse still, it’s been overly dependant on “individual goodwill”, rather than a true commitment to change across the force.

That’s according to the final report from the Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board (ISOB), whose job was to oversee the PRAP. It also marks the end of both the PRAP as a standalone programme, and the ISOB itself.

As ever when we write on police racism at the Canary, the report observed that forces used inquiries and action plans as a substitute for real change.

The report drew on 36 interviews with civil organisations, community leaders and policing professionals. It found that, in spite of everything, the very institutional racism of the police is still a point of contention. In fact, just 6 of the 44 individual forces covered by the PRAP had even deigned to acknowledge their institutional racism.

Advertisement

‘That commitment has not yet been met’

Abimbola Johnson, ISOB chair, said:

Five years ago, policing committed to improving outcomes for Black communities. That commitment has not been met. Progress has been slow, uneven and too dependent on individual effort rather than institutional change.

The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing established the PRAP back in 2020. It followed the police murder of George Floyd in the US, and the consequential wave of international Black Lives Matter demonstrations.

Ostensibly, the PRAP aimed to improve policing for Black people — both the public and within the police. However, that promise has not materialised. Johnson went on to state that:

Without properly enforced legal obligations, a robust inspection framework and clear consequences for failure, progress on race equity within policing will remain partial and reversible. This mirrors the pattern of previous reforms, dating back to Scarman and Macpherson. Black communities now deserve structural accountability. Government and policing must decide whether to deliver it or allow reform to stall again.

Final findings

As these reports and inquiries have found repeatedly, the single most significant barrier to progress is the racist culture of the police. There’s no external framework or imposed solution that can fix a system that doesn’t want to change.

Advertisement

And make no mistake — this is a systemic problem. Whilst individual police show shocking and flagrant racism, that bigotry is also embedded within the structures of policing. As such, any framework that treats racism as an individual problem in the forces will inevitably fail to make meaningful impact.

Likewise, race and racism cannot be understood within a vacuum. Police understanding of intersectionality remains a “significant and under-addressed gap.” Failure to address this means that the greatest harms will inevitably fall on multiple marginalised individuals.

The report also found that the single biggest driver of real change was the commitment of police leadership. When senior leaders were visibly committed to anti-racism, the forces under them showed greater progress. Conversely, where leaders’ commitment was lacking or clearly performative, nothing improved.

Alongside this, the police have been far better at making plans to tackle racism than actually delivering change. However, and far too often, these plans are spoken about as if they are “the change.” Repeatedly and consistently, actual impact has fallen short of the stated aims.

Advertisement

As such, it’s both unsurprising and appalling that Black communities still can’t trust the police. The report stated plainly that forces can’t built this trust through words and gestures of goodwill. Rather, they must show a real and sustained change in their behaviour before community attitudes can improve.

Progress ‘is now being reversed’

Regarding the ISOB’s final findings, Andy George – leader of the National Black Police Association – stated that:

After more than £10m of investment, it has failed to deliver on its core aim: improving the experience of policing for Black people.

The reality is the environment is becoming more toxic and the progress made since the Macpherson report is now being reversed.

The report itself indicated that any lasting progress is undermined by the utter lack of statutory accountability in making change. It made clear that:

Advertisement

Without legal duties, enforceable standards and independent inspection, progress depends entirely on goodwill and voluntary programs, leading to the PRAP inevitably being de-prioritised and treated as an ‘add-on’.

Both illustrating and compounding this issue, the end of the PRAP and ISOB, leaves absolutely no independent oversight in place. As such, the report urged the Home Office to:

establish and fund independent scrutiny, mandate national data standards, and embed race equity within inspection and performance frameworks.

We at the Canary have lost count of the number of times that new reports, new reviews, independent external and internal enquiries, and public bodies have highlighted and exposed institutional police racism, and the utter lack of willingness to change.

Time and again, we’ve watch police trot out their plans to fix racism, then sit back and pretend that the plan was the work itself.

So, we sign off as just as we have before. How many times do we have to write this same article?

Advertisement

UK police are racist because racism is embedded in the very core of their mission. It’s not one bad apple. It’s not one bad barrel. Its root and branch, tree and orchard.

Featured image via NPCC

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Therapist Explains Why Children Feel Lonely And How To Help Them

Published

on

Therapist Explains Why Children Feel Lonely And How To Help Them

What Kids Are Carrying is a HuffPost UK series focusing on how the nation’s youngest generation is *really* feeling right now – and how parents and caregivers can support them.

Children are feeling increasingly lonely and unheard, according to therapists, who say it was one of the top issues brought up by kids in therapy in 2025.

Counselling Directory member Mandi Simons said her practice is seeing more children and young people describe “a sense of loneliness”, but it’s not always about being alone.

“Many are surrounded by people, yet still feel unheard and misunderstood,” she told HuffPost UK.

Advertisement

Similarly, therapist Debbie Keenan, also a Counselling Directory member, said there’s been “an increase of children not just feeling isolated, but feeling unheard”.

One in three young people say they do not feel part of their local community, and young people in Britain are more likely to report feelings of loneliness than any other age group, with 70% of 18- to 24-year-olds reporting they feel lonely at least some of the time.

What is driving loneliness among children?

“From our therapists’ experience, this rarely comes from a lack of care,” said Simons. “More often, it reflects the reality of modern day family life, with busy parents juggling multiple demands, alongside conversations that can feel rushed or move too quickly into fixing or reassuring.”

Advertisement

She noted “social media can add to this, creating pressure and comparison while reducing genuine connection”.

Keenan agrees social media usage is playing into this, as is social thinning, where everyday opportunities for meaningful interactions have greatly reduced.

Between 2010 and 2023, more than 1,200 council run youth centres closed across England and Wales, and local authority spending on youth services in England plummeted by just over 70%.

Meanwhile, between 2014 and 2024, the number of young people (aged 16-24) experiencing common mental health conditions rose from 19% to 26%.

Advertisement

Research suggests that today’s children have significantly less freedom to roam, play outdoors, or gather with friends than previous generations.

“Regular, meaningful and constant connections are the key to reducing isolation. Without these connections, children miss out on building the foundations of relationships, trust and a sense of belonging,” said Keenan.

“Years ago, there were youth clubs etc, where children could meet and socialise, they have now become a thing of the past.

“The world in general has got so busy, people are juggling many shifts of emotional, work and childcare needs.”

Advertisement

The issue is, when adults are busy or distracted, children can feel “dismissed”, said the therapist. “Over time, this can create a sense of ‘my voice doesn’t matter’. They then become quieter and withdraw.”

Supporting children who are lonely

“Don’t highlight the issue, start noticing behaviour,” advises Keenan. Have they become withdrawn? Are they spending longer periods of time isolated?

Both therapists advise carving out time to be emotionally available and present. “Pause distractions and give your child your full attention,” said Keenan. Create pockets of “special time” where you can spend quality time together.

Advertisement

They also both recommend active listening – giving your child your full attention, without interrupting, and repeating back what you have heard.

“What children need most is to feel properly listened to,” said Simons.

“That means slowing conversations down, showing genuine curiosity, and acknowledging feelings before offering solutions.”

Simple family mindfulness practices, even brief moments of being fully present together without distraction, can help create the space for this, she added.

Advertisement

Not only that but spending time together as a family – whether that’s playing board games or sitting down for dinner together, without interruptions from phones and devices – can provide an opportunity for kids to feel seen, heard, and connected.

“When a child says they feel unheard, we would encourage parents to see this not as criticism, but as an invitation to reconnect. Small shifts in how and when we listen can make a meaningful difference,” added Simons.

As well as carving out time for you to hang out as a family, Keenan advised organising play dates and offering your child support to build their social connections – for example, through extracurricular activities.

She concludes: “Don’t be hard on yourself, the world is evolving at a fast speed. Have compassion for yourself, parenting is hard.”

Advertisement

With connection, compassion, communication; all while being listened to, acknowledged, and valued; “children can naturally start to grow in confidence, feel less isolated and feel like their voice is being heard”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Meryl Streep Says ‘Damn Yes’ To Third Mamma Mia! Film

Published

on

Meryl Streep and Amanda Seyfried in the first Mamma Mia! movie

Meryl Streep is ready to don those famous blue overalls once again, hinting that she wants to reprise one of her most beloved film roles.

During an appearance on Wednesday’s edition of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, the host asked the three-time Oscar winner if she would want to star in another Mamma Mia! film.

Without taking a second to think about it, an enthusiastic Meryl enthused: “Damn, yes!”

Advertisement

Speculation has been swirling since the second Mamma Mia! film came out in 2018 about whether another sequel could be on its way.

The rumour drill then went into overdrive in 2025, when several cast members revealed they’d been in talks with the producers about returning to the musical franchise.

Amanda Seyfried, who played Sophie Sheridan in both films, claimed in November 2025 that the wheels were in motion for the threequel, sharing with Entertainment Tonight: “Of course it’s not off the table, it’s searing a hole into the table.”

She added: “Maybe I should just be coy, or maybe I’m just naïve, but I’m pretty sure Mamma Mia! 3 is a done deal. I love portraying a mum, so I would love to see Sophie with her kids.”

Advertisement
Meryl Streep and Amanda Seyfried in the first Mamma Mia! movie
Meryl Streep and Amanda Seyfried in the first Mamma Mia! movie

Universal Pictures/Relativity Media/Littlestar/Playtone/Kobal/Shutterstock

Meryl’s latest comments are not the first time she has expressed her interest in reprising her role in another ABBA jukebox musical.

Speaking at the Cannes Film Festival in 2024, the Death Becomes Her actor said: “Of course I want to do it. I think folks love it.”

Of course, considering Meryl’s character, Donna, died off-screen in the second film, it’s unclear exactly how the Mamma Mia! team would go about bringing Donna back.

NBCUniversal Entertainment chairman Donna Langley told Deadline earlier this year that they would find a way around Donna’s death if Meryl wanted to return, insisting: “If Meryl Streep would like to come back, we’ll find a way to bring her back.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Stellan Skarsgård – who played Bill, one of Donna’s former flings, in the film – commented in January about how desperate people are to bring Meryl’s character back from the dead.

“Everybody can be brought back from the dead in the movies – and in the movies, she’s fantastic,” the Oscar nominee insisted. “A lot of people are working on it, to bring her back.”

Other cast members who have hinted at their return to Mamma Mia! 3 include Christine Baranski and Pierce Brosnan, who have both revealed that they had met with producer Judy Craymer to discuss the threequel.

Craymer has also hinted that Sabrina Carpenter could be involved in a potential third film, and that the team have their eye on adding the Grammy winner to the cast.

Advertisement

“She’d be a goddess or some relation who would look very much like Meryl Streep,” she told Deadline about the House Tour singer.

Before she (hopefully!) returns as Donna, Meryl is about to reprise another of her most iconic roles, starring in the upcoming The Devil Wears Prada sequel as Miranda Priestly.

Mamma Mia! and Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again are currently streaming on Netflix.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How The Cost Of Living Crisis Is Impacting UK’s Record Low Birth Rates

Published

on

How The Cost Of Living Crisis Is Impacting UK's Record Low Birth Rates

Since 2012, the UK’s fertility rate has dropped dramatically.

In 2023, it reached a new low of 1.6 children; thinktank The Resolution Foundation said in their recent “Bye Bye Baby” report that 2024 figures suggest it could “fall further still”.

Some are concerned we’re “unprepared” for the consequences of this trend, worrying that an ageing population might place enormous pressure on public services without a broad tax base to counterbalance that strain.

But the Bye Bye Baby report suggests that not all of this change comes down to choice.

Advertisement

They write that “preferences for family size have remained stable,” and that the “recent decline appears to be driven, in part, by financial constraints facing young non-graduates, rather than a shift in what people actually want”.

Housing and economic pressures matter

The research showed that the number of women who don’t have kids by 30 has risen in England and Wales from 48% for those born in the late 1980s to 58% for those born in the early 1990s.

Of course, they add, these women might go on to have kids. Still, the change is not seen equally across groups of women.

Advertisement

“Non-graduate women in their late 20s have seen the sharpest rise in childlessness,” they write.

“This has happened alongside falling partnership rates and a major shift away from homeownership towards costly private renting and living with parents, both of which make starting a family harder.”

In fact, added financial pressure seems to affect more than just fertility rates: it might impact the number of women who feel the desire to have children to begin with.

Among childless 32-year-old women, those in the lowest income quarter are almost twice as likely as those in the top income quarter to say they’ve permanently decided against having kids.

Advertisement

Overall, about 30% of women and 25% of men said they hadn’t had a child yet because of their financial situation.

So, while the report stresses that some people simply never wanted kids, the data suggest others’ hands are being somewhat forced.

These findings mirror those found in similar research

A 2025 global survey of over 14,000 people by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) found similar results.

Advertisement

54% of respondents from 14 countries cited “economic concerns” as the top reason they didn’t have children, or couldn’t have as many as they wanted.

That made it the most common issue among those asked.

An anonymous Mexican woman who was a part of the survey said, “It is impossible to buy or have affordable rent in my city”.

The UNFPA said that the solution is not to pressure women into having children they don’t want, but for policymakers to consider that “Many people would choose to have children if they could be sure the world they are bringing them into offered a clean environment, a healthy economy and a safe place to live”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Super Mario Galaxy Movie: Sequel Divides Critics And Reviewers

Published

on

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie introduces the character of Yoshi, voiced by Donald Glover

The reviews for the new Super Mario Bros. Movie have been published and… it sounds like the film is anything but a level-up.

While we weren’t exactly expecting the follow-up to the animated video game adaptation to be the next Citizen Kane, it’s worth pointing out that the response to the first film was, at least, somewhat mixed, and it went on to gross more than a billion dollars at the global box office, making it the 20th biggest box office earner of all time at the time of writing.

Ahead of The Super Mario Galaxy Movie’s release at the end of this week, critics have been having their say, and they’ve certainly not been holding back, with a smattering of two- and one-star reviews (not to mention a zero-star take from one particularly unimpressed reviewer).

Here’s a selection of what’s been said so far about The Super Mario Galaxy Movie…

Advertisement

“Of course it’s intended for little kids, but it surely didn’t need to be such a visually dull screensaver of a movie, with even more of the cheesy, Euro-knockoff look of that first film. And, again, the paucity of funny lines is a real puzzle.”

“It’s a supremely vacuous anti-movie that climaxes with a sequence featuring full-screen Nintendo gameplay, as if to remind us of the levels of rancid commercial whoredom we’ve reached.

“The film is torturous to sit through and, for me, provoked periods of actual physical discomfort. I had to stab myself repeatedly in the hand with a pen to distract from the howling distress. It’s that bad, and that offensive.”

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie introduces the character of Yoshi, voiced by Donald Glover
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie introduces the character of Yoshi, voiced by Donald Glover

Nintendo/Illumination/Universal

“It’s testament to just how bad the original Super Mario Bros Movie was that this sequel can be a noticeable improvement in every respect – animation, storytelling, humour, vocal performances, you name it – while still comfortably qualifying as absolute rubbish.”

Advertisement

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is frenetic in such an impersonal way that it feels like the entire film should be put on Ritalin […] The film treats its story as a threadbare adventure, a mere throwaway, because it’s so focused on those little pings of recognition for gamers. And that’s quite a comedown.”

“[The Super Mario Galaxy Movie] offers the adults a few pings of nostalgia, but otherwise it’s a humourless, hysterical trudge. […] The moments of fan service might keep the hardcore happy, but for everyone else over the age of five it’s just a succession of loud, bright things happening without any real point.”

“Relentlessly fast-paced and filled with hyperkinetic visuals, the sequel hits the sweet spot in terms of what its target audience wants, even if adult non-aficionados will find little of interest other than the starry vocal cast.”

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doubles down on its own blandness. There’s barely a plot here. Not a single memorable character. Not even another piano ditty for Jack Black to sing […] There is… one real, solid joke in this film? And it’s mostly just repeating a bit from Disney’s Zootopia.”

Advertisement
Anya Taylor-Joy and Chris Pratt return as Princess Peach and Mario
Anya Taylor-Joy and Chris Pratt return as Princess Peach and Mario

Nintendo/Illumination/Universal

“A movie like this will probably make a lot of money, because it doesn’t rock the boat. But a boat that never rocks is a boat that never goes anywhere. That’s how boats work. They’re supposed to take you on a journey.

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t take you anywhere you haven’t been before, and it’s not as fun, it’s not as exciting, and it’s not as challenging as literally any of the games it’s based on. This is not an adaptation of the Super Mario Bros., it’s just a reminder that the franchise exists.”

“A masterpiece of game design that provides endless levels of unique planets to roam and explore, 2007’s Super Mario Galaxy is filled with moments of pure euphoric joy […] yet somehow on screen, it all registers as flat, imagination packaged into the most cleanly corporate and focus-group approved form possible.”

“While it’s likely that retro gamers won’t find anything here that wasn’t in the first movie – Yoshi and one or two others aside – it’s no doubt got enough for kids to enjoy, which will surely come as a relief for parents looking to entertain their offspring over the Easter holidays.”

Advertisement

“This is not a movie to be scrutinised, but to allow beleaguered elder millennial dads to sit their tots down for a precious two hours (if you count the trailers) and get some much-needed rest. It’s cute, and breezy, and rock-stupid, and will probably make a billion dollars again. Such is the world in which we live.”

“This film is even more of a manic roller coaster ride compared to the first movie, with so many gaming references packed into every scene, it’s hard to keep up. There are also a lot more power-ups used this time around, and that results in some fun and interesting combat for Mario and Luigi.”

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie arrives in cinemas on Friday.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform UK Sacks Housing Spokesman Over Grenfell Comments

Published

on

Reform UK Sacks Housing Spokesman Over Grenfell Comments

Reform UK has the party’s housing spokesman over his “disgraceful” comments about the Grenfell Tower tragedy.

Nigel Farage said Simon Dudley no longer speaks for the party on the issue following a furious backlash.

Dudley said “everyone dies in the end” and “fires happen” as he said there was now too much regulation in the building industry.

A huge fire at the 24-storey west London tower block killed 72 people in 2017.

Advertisement

The tragedy led to a major overhaul of building regulations to prevent it happening again.

But in an interview with the trade publication Inside Housing, Dudley said the pendulum had “swung too far the wrong way”.

He said the Grenfell fire was a “tragedy” but added: “Sadly, you know, everyone dies in the end. It’s just how you go, right?”

Dudley went on: “Extracting Grenfell from the statistics, actually people dying in house fires is rare.

Advertisement

“Many, many more people die on the roads driving cars, but we’re not making cars illegal, so why are we stopping houses being built?”

Keir Starmer called on Farage to sack Dudley over the “shameful” remarks, but Reform initially refused to do so.

But at a press conference on Thursday, the Reform leader said: “He’s no longer a spokesman for the party. That has been dealt with.”

Farage’s announcement was a surprise as the party had spent hours refusing to act, despite the mounting anger at Dudley’s comments.

Advertisement

Party officials directed journalists to a statement he posted on X in which he denied “belittling” the Grenfell tragedy.

He said: “It must never happen again. I reiterate that, and am sorry if it was not sufficiently clear.”

Farage later said Dudley had acted “in a pretty hurtful, insulting way to an awful lot of people”.

Grenfell was an utter tragedy and quite rightly prompted a wholesale review and tightening of fire regulations. I said it was a tragedy in my interview with Inside Housing and in no shape or form am I belittling that disaster or the huge loss of life. It must never happen again.…

— Simon Dudley (@SimonDudleyUK) April 2, 2026

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Teen Boys Are Dating AI Chatbots Now

Published

on

Teen Boys Are Dating AI Chatbots Now

One in five boys know someone their age who is in a relationship with an AI chatbot, according to a new survey.

Male Allies UK caught up with over 1,000 boys aged 12-16 years old to dive into their behaviour and attitudes when it comes to engaging with AI chatbots.

The vast majority, eight in 10 boys (85%) have had a conversation with a chatbot, with 43% of boys saying they are talking to bots so they can ask questions that they have without feeling embarrassed.

Over a quarter (26%) said they like the attention and connection over real-life connections.

Advertisement

Robot romance is also on the rise, with over half of boys (58%) saying that AI relationships are easier because you can control the conversation.

Over one third (36%) of boys admitted they prefer speaking to AI chatbots over family and friends.

Lee Chambers, founder of Male Allies UK, said: “As parents we didn’t grow up with chatbots, and so we’re left in the dark on whether they are harmless or dangerous.

“What we do know is that spending time online can feel sociable but can actually be incredibly isolating. The main problem with developing a relationship with an AI chatbot is that it means that you are spending that time speaking to technology instead of building real-life connections.”

Advertisement

Concerns over AI chatbot relationships

Chambers noted that chatbots are, by default, submissive, and reassure and reaffirm people’s thoughts because “they want you to like them”.

“On top of this you can create your perfect ‘person’, moulding not only how they look but how they respond to you, how they treat you, and you can start and stop the relationship on a whim. This isn’t real life – and these instant gratification behaviours seeping into real life will have consequences.”

AI bots aren’t just being used as companions, either. Chambers noted they are enabling behaviour in boys that can cause irreparable damage with the rise of nudification apps.

Almost one in 10 (9% of) boys aged 12-16 years old have used AI to create sexual images of their friends, with 5% admitting to using AI to create sexual images of family members, according to Male Allies research.

Advertisement

Just under half (47%) of boys in this age bracket know of sexual AI images/videos being created whilst at school.

Why boys say they are spending more time online

New data from the Boys In Schools report from Male Allies explored reasons as to why boys might be spending more time online – and turning to AI chatbots for company.

Most (81% of) boys say they don’t think there are enough physical spaces for them.

Advertisement

Chambers suggested boys need “real-life connection and conversation” and “to know that they are supported and that they can speak up about what they are doing online without being judged”.

“We can’t just remove every new trend online, instead we need to bridge the gap between boys who are growing up with social media and AI and parents who are worried about the unknown,” he said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025