Connect with us

Business

Dodgers, Red Sox and Padres Emerge as Biggest Winners, Orioles Biggest Losers

Published

on

Tarik Skubal

The 2026 MLB trade deadline delivered one of the most eventful stretches in recent memory, with a wave of star pitchers changing teams and a stunning catcher blockbuster capping off a whirlwind final day that reshaped the league’s playoff picture.

The action began in earnest Saturday night, when the Detroit Tigers stunned the baseball world by trading ace Tarik Skubal to the reigning champion Los Angeles Dodgers. From there, the pace only intensified, with Freddy Peralta heading to the Tampa Bay Rays and Kevin Gausman landing with the Chicago Cubs on Sunday, before Monday’s deadline day brought a flood of additional deals, including several intra-division swaps and one especially surprising blockbuster.

The Dodgers land the deadline’s top prize

Few teams came away from the deadline in a stronger position than the Los Angeles Dodgers, who acquired Skubal, this year’s most coveted trade chip, without giving up any established big-league talent or gutting their farm system in the process. Beyond the Skubal deal, the defending champions also made a lower-risk addition in injured Royals starter Kris Bubic, an All-Star last season, and bolstered their catching depth by adding reinforcements while regulars Will Smith and Dalton Rushing dealt with injuries. Analysts covering the deadline widely agreed that landing Skubal alone would have been enough to declare the Dodgers among the deadline’s biggest winners, regardless of what else the team did over the following two days.

Advertisement

A stunning blockbuster sends Rutschman to Boston

The deadline’s most surprising move came Monday, when the Baltimore Orioles sent star catcher Adley Rutschman to the Boston Red Sox in exchange for a significant haul of Boston’s top prospects, reportedly including three of the organization’s top five. The trade marked a dramatic fall for a Baltimore team that just three years ago won 101 games and appeared poised to build a potential American League dynasty. The Orioles also dealt outfielder Taylor Ward to the Seattle Mariners, along with pitchers Tyler Wells and Dean Kremer, effectively signaling an end to any realistic postseason hopes for Baltimore this season.

For the Red Sox, the return was viewed almost universally as a win. Boston entered the deadline aggressively, and the early returns looked promising, with newly acquired infielder Curtis Mead performing well almost immediately after the trade. Combined with the Rutschman addition, Boston, along with the Cubs and Dodgers, was widely cited among the deadline’s biggest overall winners for the scale of improvement each team made to its roster heading into the stretch run.

Padres load up on pitching without sacrificing Miller

Advertisement

The San Diego Padres also emerged as one of the deadline’s clear winners, addressing a rotation that had become a glaring weakness even as the team’s offense began clicking in recent weeks and pushed San Diego back into playoff contention. The Padres added both Robbie Ray and Casey Mize to bolster their pitching staff, moves that came on top of already having Nick Pivetta and Joe Musgrove working their way back from rehab assignments. Perhaps just as notable as what San Diego added was what it chose not to give up: the team held onto closer Mason Miller despite persistent trade speculation, a decision analysts framed as a win in its own right.

Sellers cash in in a seller’s market

With so many teams pushing to buy at the deadline, sellers found themselves in an unusually strong negotiating position. The San Francisco Giants and New York Mets both leaned heavily into selling and were widely credited with capitalizing on that dynamic, extracting strong returns for the players they moved. Smaller-market clubs including the Pittsburgh Pirates, Chicago White Sox, Cleveland Guardians and Los Angeles Angels also drew praise for departing from their usual cautious approach, making aggressive moves to either improve their playoff odds or restock diminished farm systems.

Tigers and Orioles among the deadline’s biggest losers

Advertisement

On the other side of the ledger, the Detroit Tigers emerged as one of the deadline’s most notable losers, a distinction tied directly to trading away Skubal following what analysts described as a disappointing offseason in which the club did little to address bullpen and offensive shortcomings. That inaction, more than any single deadline decision, was cited as the root cause behind Detroit’s need to move its ace rather than build around him.

The Orioles fared even worse in the eyes of most analysts. Baltimore’s decision to trade Rutschman, taken with the No. 1 overall pick in the 2019 draft, without the team ever winning a single postseason game during his tenure, was described by some as a franchise failure years in the making, even if the return of top Red Sox prospects made sense from a pure value standpoint given Rutschman’s injury history and inconsistent production relative to his reputation. Entering Monday, Baltimore held roughly a 17% chance of making the playoffs, according to projections from FanGraphs, though most analysts agreed the team never truly played like a postseason contender this season.

Yankees and Phillies left wanting more

The New York Yankees were also widely viewed as coming up short at the deadline, with critics arguing the team failed to do enough to meaningfully improve its roster amid a tightening American League race. The Philadelphia Phillies faced similar criticism, having entered deadline day suddenly fighting just to secure a wild-card spot without adding the starting pitching help many analysts felt the roster needed. Philadelphia’s other deadline additions also created ripple effects across its infield, with third baseman-turned-second baseman Bryson Stott shifting again to an unfamiliar spot at third base, while Bryce Harper moved back to right field, the position where he began his career, and Alec Bohm shifted from third base to first.

Advertisement

With the deadline now in the rearview mirror, analysts caution that true winners and losers won’t be fully clear until the postseason plays out, or until some of the prospects dealt away Monday accumulate more experience in the years ahead. For now, though, the flurry of moves has reshaped the National and American League playoff pictures heading into the season’s final stretch, setting up what many expect to be one of the most competitive finishes in recent memory.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Intel Stock Soars Over 7% as Chip Sector Rally Builds Ahead of AMD’s Big Earnings Report Tuesday Afternoon

Published

on

The Intel Corporation logo is seen  in Davos

Intel shares surged more than 7% Tuesday morning, climbing to $97.93 as of 9:41 a.m. Eastern time, as semiconductor stocks broadly rallied ahead of a highly anticipated earnings report from rival Advanced Micro Devices due after the market closes.

Tuesday’s gains build on a volatile several weeks for Intel, whose stock has swung sharply between rallies and steep pullbacks even as the company’s underlying turnaround story, led by Chief Executive Lip-Bu Tan, continues to unfold. Shares closed Monday at $91.00, up a modest 0.89%, before extending gains further in Tuesday’s session as broader risk appetite returned to the chip sector.

A wild recent stretch for Intel shares

Intel’s stock has been on an extraordinary run over the trailing 12 months, at one point posting gains exceeding 350% to 460% depending on the measurement window, as investors bought into the company’s turnaround narrative following a brutal stretch in 2025 that saw shares hit a 52-week low near $19. The stock later climbed as high as $142.35 before pulling back sharply in recent weeks amid broader semiconductor sector jitters.

Advertisement

Much of that recent volatility traces back to late July, when a disappointing earnings report from Samsung triggered a wave of selling across chip stocks tied to concerns about PC and server chip demand. Intel shares fell roughly 9% to 10% on multiple occasions during that stretch, at one point ranking among the worst performers in the S&P 500 on a single trading day as investors reassessed the broader chip sector’s near-term outlook.

Intel’s own second-quarter earnings, released July 24, initially failed to stabilize the stock despite topping expectations. The company reported revenue of $16.1 billion, up 25% year-over-year and ahead of the high end of its own guidance of $14.8 billion, while also guiding third-quarter revenue to roughly $16.3 billion, comfortably above analyst consensus estimates of $15.1 billion. Despite the beat, CNBC commentator Jim Cramer described the stock’s subsequent decline as “some of the most hideous selling” he had witnessed, attributing the drop to broader anxiety around AI infrastructure spending rather than any specific issue with Intel’s results. Cramer has since argued that Intel stock “belongs at $110,” well above where shares have traded in recent sessions.

Analysts remain divided on valuation

Wall Street’s views on Intel remain notably split heading into Tuesday’s rally. Rosenblatt raised its price target on the stock to $65 from $50 but maintained a Sell rating, arguing the stock’s dramatic run has outpaced its underlying fundamentals. That stands in sharp contrast to the broader Street consensus price target, which sits closer to $112, reflecting continued optimism from other analysts about Intel’s foundry business and its expanding role in AI infrastructure.

Advertisement

Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland has maintained a more neutral stance but raised his price target to $115 from $80 in recent weeks, citing stronger-than-anticipated server CPU demand, while KeyBanc’s John Vinh has taken a more bullish position, reiterating a Buy rating with a price target of $155.

Foundry progress and AI demand fuel optimism

Much of the bullish case for Intel centers on the ongoing revival of its foundry business, which has shown signs of improvement after years of losses and delayed manufacturing milestones. Intel’s foundry segment generated $5.4 billion in revenue during the first quarter, a 20% sequential increase driven by higher production of advanced chips, with external foundry revenue reaching $174 million during the same period. While the segment remains unprofitable, losses have moderated, and management has said it expects further operating improvement in the coming quarters.

Intel has also continued expanding its advanced packaging business, recently deepening a technology partnership tied to its EMIB packaging platform, an area where rival Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has reportedly been developing competing technology aimed at the same high-performance computing and AI chip market. Separately, research firm Omdia has projected global semiconductor revenue will surge 94.1% year-over-year in 2026, citing industry-wide bottlenecks in high-bandwidth memory production, a forecast that has added to broader bullish sentiment across chip stocks including Intel.

Advertisement

A rally tied to the broader market, not just Intel

Tuesday’s jump in Intel shares appeared closely tied to broader strength across the semiconductor sector rather than any single Intel-specific announcement. AMD shares also climbed sharply in Tuesday’s session ahead of its own earnings report, while the broader market extended a multi-day rally driven by easing tensions in the Middle East, falling oil prices, and a string of strong corporate earnings reports from companies including Caterpillar and Palantir Technologies. That supportive macro backdrop has helped lift previously beaten-down chip names, including Intel, even as some analysts continue to debate whether recent price gains fully reflect the execution risk still facing the company’s multi-year turnaround plan.

Government backing remains a factor

Intel’s rise over the past year has also been shaped in part by direct financial support from the U.S. government, which took a stake in the company last year as part of a broader push to maintain domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity. That backing, combined with new customer commitments from companies including Google and reported discussions involving Apple and Nvidia around potential foundry partnerships, has continued to feature prominently in the bull case for Intel shares even as the stock’s underlying earnings power remains a subject of debate among analysts.

Advertisement

With AMD’s second-quarter results due after Tuesday’s closing bell, investors will be watching closely for any read-through to Intel and the broader chip sector, particularly around AI infrastructure demand and server CPU competition between the two companies. Given Intel’s history of sharp single-session swings in both directions over the past year, analysts caution that Tuesday’s rally, like the sector-wide selloffs that preceded it, may prove more reflective of shifting market sentiment than a definitive signal about the company’s longer-term execution on its turnaround strategy.

Continue Reading

Business

SpaceX posts $US541m loss in first report since IPO

Published

on

SpaceX posts $US541m loss in first report since IPO

SpaceX has lost more than half a billion dollars in its first quarterly report as a public company, but the loss was less than Wall Street expected and revenue soared.

Continue Reading

Business

Can Fast Fashion Fit Into Secondhand Clothes?

Published

on

Can Fast Fashion Fit Into Secondhand Clothes?

Welcome back. Big fashion retailers are leaning further into secondhand clothing to drive fresh sales growth, score sustainability credentials and generate brand buzz, Clara Hudson reports this morning for The Wall Street Journal.

  • Banana Republic recently launched limited-edition drops featuring pieces from the ’70s, ’80s and ’90s.
  • Reformation expanded its “preloved” section, where it sells vintage items from brands including Prada and Bebe alongside its own styles.
  • H&M has rolled out roughly a dozen secondhand pop-ups in recent years, including new SoHo, Stockholm and Vienna locations.

“A lot of this is about the customer, but it’s also good business sense,” said Sofia Måhlén, team lead of circular business models at H&M. The resale market is growing faster than conventional retail, she said.

Still, the top-line impact remains modest: Resold items accounted for just 0.8% of H&M’s total sales revenue in 2025, including the company’s other brands and investments.

I asked Clara how marketers are balancing traditional high-volume business models with secondhand strategies.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Experts advise caution as CAS fuels arbitrage fund NAV volatility

Published

on

Experts advise caution as CAS fuels arbitrage fund NAV volatility
Mumbai: Arbitrage fund investors were surprised Monday to see the net asset values (NAV) of their portfolios surge an average 0.46% in a single day, translating into an annualised yield of 167%. What explains such drastic movements in an asset class that barely yields 7% a year or about 0.02% a day? Well, this happened on the first day after the introduction of the closing auction session (CAS) for F&O stocks by the National Stock Exchange (NSE).

Fund managers said teething troubles with the new auction system will cause skewed NAVs. “For arbitrage funds, the CAS does introduce some execution and hedging considerations,” said Kaivalya Nadkarni, fund manager, DSP Mutual Fund.

Analysts Advise Caution as CAS Skews NAVsAgencies

Teething Trouble Incidents like a rise in arbitrage fund NAVs expected to happen until new system stabilises

Arbitrage strategies typically involve taking offsetting positions in the cash and derivatives markets simultaneously. “While the cash market for securities with available derivatives halts at 3:15 pm, the equity derivatives market continues to trade until 3:40 pm. This makes it more challenging to establish and hedge positions simultaneously,” said Nadkarni.

Read more: Closing auction keeps traders on edge as divergence persists

Fund managers warn investors against trading in arbitrage funds with an eye on capturing risk free gains.

“Short-term NAV movements should not be viewed in isolation. The observed gain is largely a valuation effect and may reverse any time as cash and futures prices normalise,” said a Kotak mutual fund note. Nadkarni said CAS participation accounted for only 2.2% of total daily turnover on the NSE and 0.7% on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), leaving considerable scope for participation to build over time.
Fund managers point out more than half of Monday’s gains have been erased from Tuesday’s trading session and slowly, as volumes increase and players get adjusted, the system will stabilise.
This, however, will also not lead to increase in returns for long term investors. “Arbitrage spreads are locked and returns will be fully realised on expiry day. However, in between, one will see a lot of fluctuations on a day-to-day basis. With these new rules, volatility will go up, at least in the initial days,” said Bhavesh Jain, president & co-head, factor investing, Edelweiss MF. To ride out this volatility, Jain said investors should increase their holding period in arbitrage funds from three months to at least six months until the closing-price mechanism settles.
Distributors, meanwhile, believe given the current volatility, investors should be extremely careful, stagger investments and have longer time frames.

“Stagger money over 8-10 trading sessions to help reduce any impact of temporary valuation fluctuations and increase your time frame to six months,” said Anup Bhaiya, CEO, Money Honey financial services, a Mumbai-based distributor.

Advertisement
Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

Continue Reading

Business

Compass, Inc. (COMP) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript