It seems as if streaming platforms are constantly changing their prices and plan types, and Disney Plus is no exception.

Not only does Disney Plus offer three different tiers to choose from, but the service also allows US customers to select different bundles to save money.

To help the Disney Plus price structure make a bit more sense, we explain the different plans available, the subscription costs and advise on how you can nab the popular service completely for free too.

We’ve also dissected Netflix’s price tiers too, to help you decide which plan is best suited for you and your budget. 

Disney Plus plans

	Standard with Ads	Standard	Premium
US monthly	$11.99	N/A	$18.99
US annual	N/A	N/A	$189.99
UK monthly	£5.99	£9.99	£14.99
UK annual	N/A	£99.90	£149.90

Advertisement

Which Disney+ plan is right for you?

Standard with Ads

Standard with Ads is Disney Plus’ entry-level and most affordable plan which, as its name gives away, includes advert breaks. You can expect ad breaks before and during a stream. Otherwise, Standard with Ads offers up to 1080p resolution, supports 5.1 audio (both on compatible devices) and allows users to stream on two devices at once.

Standard

Only available in the UK, Standard offers almost the same features as the Standard with Ads plan, but without those pesky advert breaks. In addition to 1080p resolution, 5.1 audio support and the ability to stream on two devices at once, Standard allows you to download content on up to 10 supported devices too. 

Premium

Premium is the most expensive Disney Plus plan, and naturally offers the most features. Like Standard, you can expect ad-free streaming and content downloads on up to 10 devices, however Premium allows four devices to stream at once, supports Dolby Atmos audio and 4K UHD and HDR video too. Just remember, you’ll need to make sure your devices are compatible. 

Advertisement

Choosing between the three plans (or two in the US) depends mainly on your budget and your viewing preference. If you want the cheapest option, and don’t mind sitting through adverts, then the Standard with Ads plan is the easiest recommendation. On the other hand, if you want a more immersive viewing experience, have the kit to support it and don’t mind forking out, then Premium is a worthwhile investment.

Bundles

If you’re based in the US, then you can choose to bundle Disney Plus with other streaming platforms, including Hulu, ESPN Plus, NFL Plus and HBO Max. The price will naturally vary depending on the bundle type:

Advertisement

Bundle	Monthly price
Disney Plus and Hulu (with ads)	$12.99
Disney Plus and Hulu Bundle Premium (ad-free)	$19.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Select (all with ads)	$19.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Select (only ESPN Select with ads)	$29.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Unlimited Bundle (all with ads)	$35.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Unlimited Bundle Premium (only ESPN Unlimited with ads)	$44.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and HBO Max Bundle (with ads)	$19.99
Disney+, Hulu and HBO Max Bundle (no ads)	$32.99
Disney Plus (with ads), Hulu (with ads), ESPN Unlimited (with ads) and NFL Plus Premium	$45.99
Disney Plus (no ads), Hulu (no ads), ESPN Unlimited (with ads) and NFL Plus Premium	$54.99

You have the option to add an extra member to your subscription plan, which allows a user access to Disney Plus – even if they aren’t in the same household. 

In the UK, adding an extra member to a Disney Plus Standard with Ads plan will add an extra £4.99 a month to your subscription. For both the Standard and Premium plans, then you’ll need to pay an additional £5.99 a month.

Advertisement

Things get a bit confusing with the US, as there’s so many bundles to choose from. At the time of writing, those signed up to the following bundles are not able to add an extra member to their plan:

• Disney Plus, Hulu, ESPN Unlimited Bundle
• Disney Plus, Hulu, ESPN Unlimited Bundle Premium
• Disney+, Hulu, HBO Max Bundle plans
• Bundle plans with NFL+ Premium

Otherwise, see the table below to see the bundles that can add an extra member to their plan, and how much that’ll cost:

Advertisement

Bundle type	Extra member monthly price
Disney Plus with Ads	$6.99
Disney Plus Premium	$9.99
Disney Plus and Hulu Bundle	$7.99
Disney Plus and Hulu Premium Bundle	$10.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Select Bundle	$11.99
Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Premium Bundle	$14.99

Remember, these prices are on top of the subscription plan.

How does Disney+ compare to Netflix and HBO Max on price?

Disney Plus, Netflix and HBO Max all come with various subscription plans to choose from, so the monthly price will vary.

Advertisement

Of the three, HBO Max boasts the cheapest option available with its Basic with Ads plan that costs just £4.99 a month, while its Standard and Premium plans cost the same as Disney Plus’ own.

HBO also benefits from more plan options which gives households a bit more flexibility. Alongside Basic with Ads there’s:

Advertisement

• Standard with Ads which offers 1080p, ad-supported streaming and allows two streams at once. This plan, unlike Basic, includes all HBO Max shows and movies that are available in the UK and will set you back £5.99 a month. 
• Standard is essentially the same as Standard with Ads plan, just without the advert breaks, and costs £9.99 a month.
• Premium promises the “ultimate HBO Max experience”, though that comes with a hefty £14.99 a month price tag. Included is 4K UHD and Dolby Atmos support, up to 100 offline downloads and the ability to stream on four devices at once.

Netflix, therefore, is the most expensive of the three. Its cheapest Standard with Ads is £5.99 a month, while Standard climbs to £12.99. This is rounded off by the Premium subscription, which will set you back a whopping £18.99 a month.

Advertisement

Cloudflare built a browser from scratch for AI agents and launched it today as a free beta inside its Browser Run product. Kitesurf runs entirely on Cloudflare Workers, uses Rust compiled to WebAssembly, and strips out everything a human browser needs but an agent does not: tabs, extensions, themes, pixel-perfect rendering, and 60-fps scrolling. What remains is a lightweight engine optimised for the things agents actually care about, structured content extraction, screenshots, and isolation between sessions.

The performance numbers are the headline. On a 14-URL test corpus, Kitesurf used 3.1x less CPU for screenshots and 3.8x less for HTML extraction compared to Chromium. Memory consumption was 4.7x lower for screenshots and 7x lower for HTML extraction. Chromium is still faster on wall-clock time by about 1.7x because its JIT compiler outpaces a cold software renderer, but CPU and memory are what drive infrastructure bills. Lower resource usage means more concurrent agent sessions at lower cost.

The project went from first commit to public beta in 12 weeks. It passes more than 215,000 Web Platform Tests and adds hundreds more each week. Bots now generate most web traffic, with AI agent activity growing nearly 8,000% in the past year. That surge is exactly why Cloudflare decided a Chromium-based headless browser, built for humans and repurposed for machines, was no longer the right tool. Kitesurf treats every page load as untrusted input, every session as stateless, and every component as isolated, a security model that matches how agents actually operate.

The browser works with Puppeteer, Playwright, and any MCP client that speaks CDP. Cloudflare is simultaneously blocking AI crawlers that harvest content without paying, while building the infrastructure for agents that do pay. That is the dual bet: charge the bots that take, and give the bots that work a cheaper, purpose-built tool to work with. Cloudflare plans to open source Kitesurf once it is ready, and eventually let customers deploy their own instances on their own accounts.

Apple may raise the prices of the iPhone 17 roster on August 10, bringing the smartphones in line with other products affected by the memory pricing crisis.

After months of being insulated from the rapidly rising cost of memory plaguing the tech industry, Apple increased the prices of most products in late June. A month and a half later, the iPhone could do the same.

According to a Friday post to Weibo, leaker Fixed Focus Digital says there are rumors of price rises for the iPhone 17. The change is also apparently happening very soon, with it potentially taking place on Monday.

The leaker openly admits that there’s some doubt about the rumor, so it may not happen, but there’s still a chance.

In the same post, they also mention that Apple has decided against an apparent increase in production capacity for the current supply chain. Some lines for unnamed products are at 15% and would’ve risen to 30%, but that’s seemingly cancelled now.

Weibo leakers don’t tend to have the best track record when it comes to accuracy, generally due to a need to churn out posts on the social media site with little in the way of checks. That said, Fixed Focus Digital has been correct in the past, such as with the name of the iPhone 16e.

That said, there is certainly a case for a raising of prices here, even with an iPhone update just a month away.

A change to the usual schedule

Apple’s typical way of changing its iPhone product catalog over the last few years involves introducing all of the new models at once. At the same time, it culls most of the previous generation.

In practice, the 2025 update brought in the iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17, and iPhone Air as the new models. The incumbent iPhone 17 Pro were cut, but Apple retained the iPhone 16 at a modest discount.

However, fall 2026 won’t be following the same pattern at all due to splitting the launches. Since Apple sells more of the premium models at first and then more of the standard edition later, it can help both its marketing teams and supply chain by staggering the releases.

The iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max are certainly anticipated to launch in September as usual, as well as the iPhone Fold, but the lower-spec iPhone 18 won’t until spring 2027.

Rather than leave a gap in the mid-section of its catalog, Apple should keep the iPhone 17 in that slot.

In that scenario, Apple has an incentive to raise the price of the iPhone 17, on the basis of it being an actively sold device for another six months. All during the memory crisis.

It is unclear if the leaker intends the iPhone 17 Pro line to go up in price, too. However, as the iPhone 18 Pro will replace them in a month’s time, complete with a $300 price increase, it may not be a good move for Apple to make.

Either way, it’s not going to be long until we know if the leaker is correct this time.

X, the social media platform now owned by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, is shaking up how it pays influencers and creators.

In announcing the change, the company said it will be winding down its existing Revenue Sharing program and replacing it with something called Original Content Rewards. X will stop accepting new Revenue Sharing participants, while existing participants will continue earning money through September 7.

Then, starting on September 8, they’ll be able to apply for the new program. Participants will still need to subscribe to one of X’s Premium tiers, and there will be qualifying thresholds for follower count (500 verified followers) and impressions (500,000 Home Timeline impressions from verified users in 90 days), but it sounds like the big change is the emphasis on originality. 

What counts as original content? X said it can include original reporting and analysis, photos and videos created by the poster, or memes and graphics they’ve designed themselves. Commentary also counts, but “if your content regularly incorporates material created by others, you’ll need to contribute meaningful original value for it to qualify under our original content guidelines.”

The company also included examples of posts that won’t count as original, such as those just copied over from another account, downloaded from one account and re-uploaded to your own, or reposting content “without meaningful transformation.”

This announcement follows repeated attempts by X to reform the Revenue Sharing program, for example reducing payments to aggregators and “clickbait” accounts in April. But these efforts have also prompted complaints from popular accounts profiting from the current system; Musk even reversed some of those changes (giving a creator’s local audience more weight when calculating payouts) after a backlash.

In a post about the new changes, X’s Allegra Jacchia wrote that the existing program “had reached a point where its incentives were misaligned.”

“Creators should be focused on bringing net new content to the platform instead of maximizing payouts,” she said. “We could have kept adding more rules and exceptions, but ultimately the better decision was to start fresh and build a program designed from day one to reward originality.”

Jacchia added that X be “continue refining the program, improving our models, and raising the bar over time.”

Photo credit: Khyzyl Saleem
Digital artist Khyzyl Saleem, better known as The Kyza, took Ferrari’s brand-new 849 Testarossa and gave it the 1980s face so many people felt was missing. Ferrari revived the name for the SF90’s replacement, yet the production car’s sharp modern lines left fans wanting stronger ties to the wide, straked icon that defined the decade. Saleem answered that quiet frustration by reskinning nearly every panel while keeping the greenhouse and the rear window that doubles as an engine cover.

Pop-up headlights return up front, a feature that Ferrari’s own designers were infatuated with before homologation laws put an end to the idea. Clean strips carved from the fenders sit on either side of a flat hood with a clean vented mesh. Slim inlets cut across the bumper just above a carbon fiber splitter that’s as prominent as it is aggressive, and the wide, pointed front end settles into a period-appropriate stance.

LEGO Technic Ferrari 488 Pista Car 42235

• SPORTS CAR BUILDING TOY – Fuel kids’ passion for high-performance vehicles with the LEGO Technic Ferrari 488 PISTA Car (42235) model building kit…
• TOY CAR WITH REALISTIC DETAILS – Kids can learn new engineering skills as they put together and explore the V8 engine with moving pistons…
• FORZA HORIZON 6 UNLOCKABLE – Unlock a special LEGO Technic livery in the Forza Horizon 6 video game – please note that a copy of the game is…

The flanks of the concept reveal the trademark side strakes pushed in deeper and more aggressively than the factory version. They stretch the body out in a clear reference to the original, while a single driver’s side mirror, another chosen historical element that Saleem did not bother to disguise, maintains the overall look authentic. Vintage HRE 505 alloys with a distinctive star-spoke pattern complete the look, sitting perfectly beneath the modified fenders.

The vehicle’s strongest point is most likely its rear end. Tiny LED taillights sit inside full-width black slats, only framed by those ultra-wide shoulders. A large but elegant carbon fiber diffuser wraps around a couple of round exhaust outlets, combining modern hybrid hardware with the historic Testarossa design without feeling forced or manufactured.

Under the hood, the concept car has the same configuration as the road car: a twin-turbo 4.0 liter V8 connected to three electric motors for a total of 1,035 horsepower transmitted to all four wheels. With 849 horsepower, the production car ranks among Ferrari’s most powerful series cars. Saleem concluded that the packaging simply need a body that felt more related to the name it conveys.

He has previously stated that he admires the factory car’s aggressive attitude, but he couldn’t resist bringing the design closer to the car’s own history to see what would happen. The tragic death of electronic music producer Kavinsky served as an emotional catalyst for Saleem to launch his endeavor. The images soon spread on Facebook and Instagram, earning high praise from many who had hoped for this type of reinterpretation – and Saleem’s design delivered in spades.
[Source]

science

Before and after shots of Elon’s ejecta snapped by Danuri

The race for the first before-and-after images of the spent SpaceX rocket on the Moon has been won by the South Korean space agency.

The Korean Aerospace Administration (KASA) posted imagery from its Danuri lunar orbiter showing the impact site on the Moon on August 6.

The impact was predicted to occur on August 5, and marked a landing on the Moon for SpaceX several years ahead of schedule, just without humans onboard and traveling a good deal faster than planned.

The words “crater” and “SpaceX” are not something investors nervously tracking the company’s stock price following the weeks since its IPO will want to think about.

The impact came on the fourth anniversary of Danuri’s launch, on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. It took a few months for the probe to reach the Moon, and its initial one-year mission has since been extended twice – most recently through 2027. The plan is currently for Danuri to intentionally make its own impact crater in March 2028.

The upper stage of the Falcon 9 is expendable, and this one was used to send Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost Mission 1 and ispace’s RESILIENCE to the Moon in 2025. On most Falcon 9 missions, the upper stage burns up in Earth’s atmosphere, but a lunar transfer orbit like this one made that impossible. In a post, SpaceX stated, “Impacts like this are rare, but they can happen with objects in these types of orbits, and we worked with NASA on the optimal disposal solution,” and wrote, “a controlled disposal maneuver is not always possible.”

NASA boss, Jared Isaacman, noted that NASA intentionally crashed spent stages into the Moon in the name of seismic research, and commented, “The reality is that meteoroids strike the lunar surface hourly, with impacts comparable to this upper stage occurring roughly every six days.”

Humanity has not done a great job of managing space junk around the Earth. While the SpaceX Falcon 9 upper stage did not pose any risk to humans, it highlights the need to devise rules for the use of lunar space rather than risk an uncontrolled buildup of debris.

In June, The Register spoke to Neuraspace boss Chiara Manfletti about how things might be done differently as lunar traffic increases. Neuraspace is all about satellite collision avoidance, and Manfletti’s ideas included requirements from stakeholders to designating dumping grounds on the Moon.

NASA’s veteran Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter was also attempting to capture the impact, and more images are likely to be released over the coming week.

Now to name the impact site. Elon Crater, anyone? ®