Connect with us

NewsBeat

Paramedic who told stroke patient ‘Jesus isn’t coming to help you’ and forced her to crawl downstairs with brain bleed is struck off

Published

on

Rachel Lemonofides was struck off as a paramedic at North West Ambulance Service. She is also a British soldier with the rank of staff sergeant

An ‘aggressive’ paramedic who told a stroke patient that ‘Jesus and Jehovah are not coming to help you’ while responding to a 999 call has been struck off.   

Rachel Lemonofides also told the patient, who was later diagnosed with a brain bleed and abdominal aortic aneurysm, to stop acting ‘like a baby’ and forced her to crawl down the stairs.

Lemonofides was dismissed by North West Ambulance Service in July 2024 after being accused of making dozens of allegedly ‘discriminatory’ or ‘racially motivated’ comments about or to the woman in January the same year.

A tribunal has now ruled that the British Army reservist, who holds the rank of staff sergeant, made up to 31 comments of this nature against the patient.

Advertisement

On January 11, 2024 an ambulance was called to the patient’s address when she began feeling a ‘sharp pain in her chest’ as she got ready for work. 

Ms Lemonofides’s crew responded to the call and they spent a total of 104 minutes at the scene before bringing the patient to hospital. 

The patient had described the pain as ‘severe and excruciating’ and she was later  ‘informed that her aorta had burst and she had a blood clot in the brain which had caused her to suffer a stroke’. 

She was ‘given a 50 per cent chance of surviving an aortic dissection’ (emergency heart surgery).

Advertisement

A nurse in the emergency department explained that the patient was having a cerebral bleed and later on, that she was also having an abdominal aortic aneurysm. 

Rachel Lemonofides was struck off as a paramedic at North West Ambulance Service. She is also a British soldier with the rank of staff sergeant

Ms Lemonofides accused the stroke patient of 'absolutely ridiculous behaviour' and refused to help her walk down the stairs after responding to the 999 call

Ms Lemonofides accused the stroke patient of ‘absolutely ridiculous behaviour’ and refused to help her walk down the stairs after responding to the 999 call 

Advertisement

However, while responding to the emergency call, Ms Lemonofides had allegedly made a series of discriminatory or racially motivated comments either to or about the patient in which the paramedic accused her of ‘ridiculous behaviour’. 

Ms Lemonofides’s remarks included telling the patient: ‘Jesus and Jehovah are not coming to help you’; ‘You are acting ridiculous now’; ‘This is like a child now’; ‘You are stuck on the floor like a child’; ‘This is a bit like silly behaviour now’; ‘We are not helping you like this, you are being silly’; and ‘I am really mad now because people are waiting for this ambulance and you are acting like a child.’ 

The paramedic also accused the patient of ‘absolutely ridiculous behaviour’ and of acting ‘as though you have had your leg ripped off’. 

She also refused to help the patient walk down the stairs at her home, forcing the stroke sufferer to crawl instead. 

Advertisement

Ms Lemonofides said the woman was ‘behaving as if you are possessed’ and told her: ‘I should let your employer know how you are behaving given the fact that you work with vulnerable people.’ 

On several occasions it was noted that Ms Lemonofides had shouted at the woman in between making some of these comments, including when she told her to ‘act your age’. 

The paramedic also said: ‘You are not dying, you have got a bad back’; ‘You should be assessed by the mental health team’; ‘You are lying, stop what you are doing, stop being a baby, let’s go downstairs.’ 

She accused the woman of ‘wasting time and making a scene’ and then told her ‘I’m not going to help you’ when she asked for ‘help to stand up and/or descending the stairs’. 

Advertisement

Ms Lemonofides also threatened to make the patient’s workplace aware of the incident, saying: ‘Stop being a baby, many people need this ambulance, we will tell your employer that you are being funny.’ 

The paramedic later said the patient was ‘just being dramatic’, telling her: ‘You have gone through child labour which is worse than this pain.’ 

In remarks that appear to have been made to a colleague during the incident, Ms Lemonofides also said: ‘I do not think this is medical, she is choosing to do this’; ‘This is like the worst behaviour I have seen for a very long time’; ‘Does she believe in black magic or anything like that?’; and ‘I can’t believe someone with a child is behaving like this’. 

The paramedic’s final comments included telling the patient that ‘we can’t take you to the hospital because your condition is not that serious’ and ‘you have 60 seconds to get up or we are leaving’.

Advertisement

The tribunal ruled that the list of 31 alleged comments made by Ms Lemonofides during the incident, some of which the Daily Mail has revealed here, were ‘proved on the balance of probabilities’.

It was ruled that her ‘dismissive and aggressive comments and behaviour continued throughout her attendance at the address’.

Ms Lemonofides admitted that she made these comments but had denied in July 2025 that her remarks were discriminatory on the grounds of ethnicity.

However, the tribunal also found that these comments were, as alleged, ‘discriminatory on the grounds of ethnicity; and/or racially motivated; and/or unprofessional, in that it breached professional boundaries’ with the patient. 

Advertisement
This promotional image identifying Ms Lemonofides as a reserve soldier was posted by North West Ambulance Service on social media

This promotional image identifying Ms Lemonofides as a reserve soldier was posted by North West Ambulance Service on social media 

The tribunal found that four witnesses, who included colleagues and the patient’s housemates, were ‘shocked’ at hearing the paramedic’s remarks about the patient being ‘possessed’ and whether she used ‘black magic’. 

‘The panel considered the audio recordings from the incident, noting the registrant [Ms Lemonofides]’s tone when making the comments about and being to Patient A,’ the tribunal ruled. 

‘In addition, the panel noted from the recordings that, when Patient A was calling out in her native language, the registrant is heard to make comments such as “stop with this nonsense”, which could have been in response to Patient A speaking in her native language and therefore suggests hostility towards Patient A’s ethnicity…

Advertisement

‘Colleague A confirmed [that] two other calls [on the same day] involved white female patients and neither of these patients were treated by the registrant in the same way she had treated Patient A.’

The panel ruled on the balance of probabilities that ‘it was more likely than not that the registrant’s conduct towards Patient A was discriminatory on the grounds of ethnicity’.

Ms Lemonofides denied her conduct was racially motivated on the day of the incident. However she was not present for the tribunal hearing.  

The tribunal found that the Army reservist’s comments about ‘black magic’ and the patient being ‘possessed’ were ‘said for a purpose’, which was to ‘make reference to Patient A’s race’.

Advertisement

‘The panel considered if the act was done in a way showing hostility or a discriminatory attitude to the relevant racial group and agreed that it was.’

It was ruled that Ms Lemonofides ‘appeared to have a bias towards the ethnicity’ of the woman.

After finding that the paramedic’s comments amounted to racially motivated discrimination, it was further ruled that her conduct ‘was an example of gross unprofessionalism and a breach of professional boundaries’ and the allegation was found proven. 

‘The panel acknowledged that some patients require a more assertive manner for different reasons, but having considered the evidence in this case, the tone and manner of the registrant’s comments, together with her treatment of Patient A, the panel agreed that her conduct was abhorrent,’ it was ruled. 

Advertisement

‘It noted the distinct lack of dignity and respect for Patient A, with no evidence of empathy or compassion from the registrant and unacceptable treatment continued over a period of time.’ 

As part of the tribunal, Ms Lemonofides also faced allegations that she told a colleague in reference to the incident: ‘If it had been filmed, you would watch it back and laugh at it.’

The panel found the paramedic guilty of having made this remark on the balance of probabilities. 

Ms Lemonofides was also accused of failing to recognise the seriousness of the patient’s condition. 

Advertisement

The tribunal found this allegation proved on the balance of probabilities after the patient described ‘having to crawl downstairs as she was unable to walk and was not assisted in doing so’. 

Ms Lemonofides was accused of ‘refusing’ to help the patient walk despite having ‘pain to her back, throat and neck’.

One of the patient’s housemates told the tribunal that they saw the woman reach out to Ms Lemonofides with her hand and ask for help, but the paramedic ‘physically moved away’ and ‘refused to help her’. 

The panel noted: ‘It was clear to the panel from the recordings that Patient A was crying out in apparent pain on numerous occasions, but the registrant was heard telling her to.’

Advertisement

A spokesman for North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust told the Daily Mail: ‘The individual no longer works for the trust. 

‘All of our patients are entitled to be treated with dignity and respect and there is no place within our organisation for colleagues who do not uphold those values.’ 

An Army spokesman said: ‘We have a common law and Data Protection Act duty to protect the personal information of our employees or ex-employees, as such we will not release any personal information relating to this case.’

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Man, 27, dies days after being punched in ‘unprovoked attack’ while cycling: Two men and woman are arrested

Published

on

George Glover 27, died from injuries he sustained when he was attacked while riding his bike in Leicester

Advertisement

A 27-year-old man has died just days after he was punched in an ‘unprovoked attack’ while cycling.

George Glover died on August 20 following the attack in Leicester three days earlier which left him with life-threatening injuries.

Mr Glover was found by a member of the public on Narborough Road at around 6.30am before he was rushed to Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham.

A 24-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit murder last night and a man, 31, and a woman, 39, remain in custody after they were arrested on suspicion of robbery and conspiracy to commit murder.

Advertisement

Mr Glover’s family have since paid tribute to their ‘much-loved son and big brother to his three siblings’ after his death.

They said: ‘His loss is already felt so deeply. He was a hardworking, focused young man who worked so hard to get a job he loved and enjoyed. 

‘George lived a simple life. He went to work then came home to enjoy his gaming or putting bike parts together. He very much kept himself to himself.

‘His siblings looked up to him and as soon as he arrived home, the banter with them would start. 

Advertisement

George Glover 27, died from injuries he sustained when he was attacked while riding his bike in Leicester 

He was found by a member of the public on Narborough Road at around 6.30am following the attack

He was found by a member of the public on Narborough Road at around 6.30am following the attack

‘He was loving, loyal and had a good sense of humour. He enjoyed Anime, Lego and Pokémon cards.

Advertisement

‘He had a tough start in life with physical challenges but we’re so proud of the young man he’d become. 

‘We know there are so many people who’ll miss him as he was held in such high regard.’     

Detective Inspector Kevin Hames said: ‘From what we’ve been able to determine, this was a violent and unprovoked attack that’s sadly led to a young man losing his life.

‘We owe it to his family to identify those responsible and bring them to justice – and I’m appealing for public help ensuring this happens.

Advertisement

‘Narborough Road is a busy route in and out of the city. Please cast your mind back to Monday morning. Were you there? What did you see?

‘I believe there are people who can help but have not yet come forward. Any information or footage you can provide could assist with our investigation.’

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Can baby monitors protect children without data security risks?

Published

on

Can baby monitors protect children without
data security risks?

For parents, keeping children safe is not only instinctive but a priority. We
babyproof the house, we check the car seat twice, we wake up in the middle of the
night at the smallest sound.

As technology has evolved, it also offered a promise to help parents watch over our kids even when we are not in the same room as them.

Throughout the different stages of kids’ lives, parents now rely on different technology to help keep kids safe. This tech now includes trackers, location-sharing apps and parental control apps. But at the earliest stages of our kids’ lives, we rely on baby monitors.

Monitors allow parents to keep an eye on babies without having to be in the same room. The first model was the Zenith Radio Nurse, released on sale in 1938.

Advertisement

More recent products have many advanced features, including contactless breathing and vital signs monitoring, AI-powered sleep analytics, cry and sound analysis, and environmental monitoring. However, these new levels of functionality depend on ever more sensors, more cloud processing, and more data being collected on children.

Parents now have to weigh up the privacy of the data these devices collect, as well
as the security risks they bring into the home. In May 2026, a security researcher in France named Sammy Azdoufal decided to probe some of the weaknesses behind budget smart cameras.

Azdoufal discovered that he could pull up other people’s live and recorded footage without needing to guess a password or do anything that really counts as “hacking”. His findings, reported by CyberNews, traced back to a shared system used behind the scenes by more than 300 different camera brands sold on retailers such as Amazon.

He estimated that more than one million devices were affected, many of them baby monitors in bedrooms.

Advertisement

Shared vulnerabilities

What most parents don’t realise is that the brand on the box is rarely the company
that built the camera or wrote its software. Many monitors, even from well known
sellers, come out of a small number of factories. They get sold under dozens of
different names, so one weakness underneath can affect them all.

The cybersecurity operations company Rapid7 published some of the first well known research into these cameras years ago, and a 2026 academic study found the same pattern repeating in newer devices and their apps.

Parents may not realise they have a right to see data collected from devices.
Rodica Vasiliev

Regulators have started responding. Updated in 2022, new cybersecurity rules under the EU’s Radio Equipment Directive have applied to any internet-connected wireless device sold in the EU. These new rules require manufacturers to protect users’ data, stop devices being hijacked and guard against fraud.

Some manufacturers are taking steps to improve security. For example, the baby monitor manufacturer Owlet announced in late 2025 that its newest model was the first baby monitor awarded the SGS Cybersecurity mark. This mark requires manufacturers to include encryption, a unique passwords and a channel for researchers to report flaws. The certification gives parents something concrete to look for.

Advertisement

Security is only half of it. Even a monitor that’s never hacked can still raise data privacy issues. Many collect more than video. They gather information on feeding times, as well as sleep and growth data, and share it with third parties for analytics or advertising under vague “partner” clauses.

Sleep pattern data from a baby monitor isn’t classed as medical information under GDPR, so companies can use it for analytics or advertising unless parents opt out.
This data often isn’t as anonymous as companies claim once combined with other details.

Cry detection and sleep analysis add to this, since both usually mean sending audio
and video to the cloud, where it may also help train a company’s algorithms.

Because these features depend on cloud processing rather than staying on the
device, the data often leaves the home network, increasing both privacy and security exposure.

Advertisement

Privacy and long-term protection

The UK has rules covering both sides of this. The Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act, in force since 2024, bans default passwords and forces manufacturers to say how long they’ll support a device.

On the data side, the UK goes further than most countries through the Information Commissioner’s Office Children’s Code, which applies to any connected device likely to be used by children.

The code requires the highest privacy settings by default, and gives parents a genuine right to see, or delete, what’s been collected, backed by fines of up to 4% of global turnover. Most parents just don’t know to ask.

None of this means every camera monitor is dangerous, or that the reassurance they
offer isn’t real. But the trade-off keeps showing up in the research. Internet-connected monitors carry more risk than simple closed ones that talk directly between two devices in your home.

Advertisement

Treat the password like a banking one, keep the app updated, and check how long the manufacturer will support it. The bigger issue isn’t something one password can fix. The underlying issues in the industry mean new vulnerabilities will keep appearing, so the safest path is staying informed and choosing devices with transparent security and support policies.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Bolton Council confirms Saturday bin collections after issue

Published

on

Bolton Council confirms Saturday bin collections after issue

Collections have been disrupted in some areas because of what Bolton Council described as unavoidable circumstances.

Residents affected by the delays have been asked to keep their bins outside while crews work through the missed rounds. They have also been told to check the council website for updates.

Bolton Council said via social media: “In some areas of Bolton, our normal bin collection schedule has been disrupted due to unavoidable circumstances.

Advertisement

“We have 7 bin wagons out tomorrow collecting missed rounds from the week.”

The message was issued on Friday, August 21, and collections are continuing today, Saturday, August 22. The council said its crews were also providing waste collections at weekends to deal with the delays.

A Bolton Council spokesman said: “Please continue to leave your bins out and check the council website for information.”

The council’s missed-bin page was last updated on Friday, August 21 at 3.41 pm. It lists streets where the authority is aware that collections have not yet taken place, meaning residents do not need to report the missed collection.

Advertisement

The list includes collections missed because of operational issues and other entries marked as no access.

It covers grey bins for general waste, beige bins for paper and card, burgundy bins for glass, cans and plastic bottles, and green food and garden waste bins.

Council records show 158 operational-issue entries between Wednesday, August 19 and Friday, August 21. These entries relate to 63 grey bins, 19 beige bins and 76 burgundy bins.

The largest number was recorded on Thursday, August 20, when the council listed 98 operational-issue entries.

Advertisement

These included 36 grey bins and 62 burgundy bins.

A further 54 entries were recorded on Friday, August 21. They included 27 grey bins, 14 beige bins and 13 burgundy bins.

Six operational-issue entries were recorded on Wednesday, August 19. They involved five beige bins and one burgundy bin.

Streets listed include Academy Way, Chorley New Road, Gilnow Road, Ladybridge Lane, Manchester Road, Mornington Road, Park Bank, Shurdington Road, St Helens Road and Wingates Grove.

Advertisement

Some streets appear more than once because different bin types were affected.

Residents whose street appears on the council’s list are advised to leave bins out for collection.

The authority says it aims to return to missed collections within two working days.

The council added: “Our crews are working hard to empty your bins, including providing waste collections at weekends.

Advertisement

“Thank you for your patience and understanding while we manage any temporary delays to services.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The two-minute habit to avoid annoying airports delays

Published

on

The two-minute habit to avoid annoying airports delays

Travellers are being urged to fully charge their electronic devices before heading to the airport, as flat batteries could cause unwanted hold-ups at security.

UK airport rules require passengers to demonstrate that devices can be switched on if requested by security staff, meaning a dead phone or laptop could lead to delays.

Daniel Frost, product manager at Destination2, said: “Always charge everything at least the night before – don’t count on a top-up at the gate, as airport sockets are often in short supply, faulty, and let’s face it, you’d rather be in duty free than searching the terminal for the opportunity to plug in.

Advertisement

“I’d always recommend packing a portable power bank in your hand luggage as a backup, but just double-check your airline’s limits as this can vary and will impact any chargers you wish to bring.

“Switch devices on and off again to confirm they’re working as intended.

“It’s such a simple thing to check, but it can be easily forgotten in the chaos of getting to the airport and the last-minute packing we’re all guilty of.”

The advice comes as Google searches for ‘airport security rules’ have risen by more than 1,000 per cent in the past year, suggesting growing confusion or concern among travellers.

Advertisement

Passengers are permitted to carry most electronic items in hand or hold luggage, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, hairdryers, straighteners, and electric shavers.

Mr Frost said: “Charging your devices should be as automatic as packing your passport – a two-minute check means one less thing to think about at security.”

He also emphasised the importance of checking airline restrictions on portable chargers, as rules can vary between carriers.

Advertisement

Will you be trying this hack? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Alan Shearer slams ‘unfit’ Man Utd and points out concern for Michael Carrick

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Manchester United started their Premier League campaign with a whimper, as Michael Carrick’s side fell to a woeful 2-0 defeat away to newly promoted Hull on Saturday

Alan Shearer has labelled Manchester United’s players ‘unfit’ after they produced a dire display in their 2-0 loss against Hull. Michael Carrick’s side got their Premier League season off to the worst possible start, with first-half goals from Hull defenders Semi Ajayi and Nobel Mendy – both from set pieces – making the difference.

But beyond the scoreline, there was plenty to separate the sides. United lacked intensity throughout and couldn’t break Hull down, as the newly promoted hosts held on to claim all three points.

Shearer gave a scathing assessment post-match, saying on BBC Radio 5 Live: “I haven’t seen Manchester United in pre-season. I saw them in this game and they didn’t look fit.

Advertisement

“They didn’t look ready to play 90 minutes of intense, high pressure, high energy football. There was only one team that looked fit there and it wasn’t Manchester United.”

FOLLOW OUR MAN UTD FB PAGE! Latest United news and more on our dedicated Facebook page

The Red Devils found themselves behind inside 17 minutes, with Ajayi pouncing on a rebound after Senne Lammens denied Oli McBurnie from a corner. Hull doubled their lead before-half time when Mendy converted an excellent free-kick from Regan Slater.

United captain Bruno Fernandes laid into his team’s performance, telling TNT Sports: “Same mistakes as we did last season, every away game we give too much of the ball to them. In the first 20 minutes, the goalkeeper was the one with the most touches.

Advertisement

“We needed to press more, be more aggressive, and then again we need to work on set-plays and not concede these type of goals. Against these types of teams, they are waiting for that moment.

Where will Manchester United finish this season? Have your say in the comments section.

“We knew before the game set-pieces would be a big part of their game. They played all pre-season with a back four but had a five against us for some height, for these moments. The most frustrating thing is that we lost the game.”

Advertisement

Carrick was less critical of the performance but vowed to ‘learn’ from it ahead of next Sunday’s home game against Ipswich, another newly promoted outfit. “I’m not going into areas [to improve] now, it’s for us to know and we’ll improve through the week and in the games,” Carrick also told TNT Sports.

“When we keep getting stronger as a group, that’ll come. Today’s a game we can’t ignore, we have a lot to learn from it – but we will.”

Join our new MAN UTD WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Manchester United content from Mirror Football. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Countdown to Kickoff: The Essential 26/27 Sky Sports Bundle

Advertisement
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Content Image

£51

£35

Sky

Get the deal here

Sky’s Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle includes at least 215 live Premier League clashes across the 2026/27 season, with more than 1,500 games from the EFL and beyond, plus F1, golf and darts.

This introductory offer saves £384 compared to the standard price, with every package also providing 100 regular channels alongside free Netflix and discovery+ subscriptions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Hull vs Manchester United LIVE highlights and reaction as Reds kick off with chastening defeat

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

Senne Lammens

Made some good saves in the first half, stopped a well-placed header from Oli McBurnie, but he could do nothing with the two goals. It spoke volumes that Lammens was United’s best player on the afternoon. 6

Noussair Mazraoui

Cleared the danger to prevent a dangerous cross in the first half, but he lost possession on a few occasions and looked vulnerable at the back. Carrick may switch to Diogo Dalot next weekend. 3

Advertisement

Harry Maguire

Looked like the only defender who could deal with Hull’s physicality and aerial balls at times. Tried his best to drag his team back into the game in the second half, which saw him make runs forward in frustration. 4

Read more here>>>

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘It’s focaccia babe’ – Ancoats Deli blasts ‘ridiculous’ one-star review left on Google

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

‘It’s focaccia babe’

A popular deli in Ancoats has issued a tongue-in-cheek response to a scathing one-star review left on Google.

Advertisement

The reviewer described Ancoats Deli on Murray Street, which has a 4.6-star rating overall and dozens of five-star reviews, as the ‘most overrated spot’ in the area. They claimed the sandwiches sold there were ‘thinly filled, unhealthy, bland and absolutely slathered in oil’.

The user, who posted under an anonymous name, said ‘there are literally dozens of better sandwich spaces in and around Ancoats’ as they left the one-star rating. They rated food as one out of five, service as one out of five and atmosphere as one out of five.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

But the deli and bar responded with a playful three-word comeback commenting ‘it’s focaccia babe’. They shared the lighthearted response on the Ancoats Deli Instagram page, where it was met with dozens of comments praising the food and service.

Advertisement

One user wrote: “Actually they’re absolutely delicious, beautiful fillings, fresh focaccia and lovely staff to boot.” Another said: “WHAT? I visited recently and I died and went to heaven. My sandwich was fabulous.”

Owner India Morris said it was important to respond because the review was ‘so ridiculous’. The 33-year-old told the Manchester Evening News: “I understand that one-star reviews are serious and very detrimental to businesses, but this one was just so ridiculous and the review from this person was just mental.

“I was speaking to my general manager in the Whatsapp chat and we were like ‘it’s literally just focaccia babe, what’s the issue’. I said just reply with that.”

India added: “It sounds like this person has never been in. The bread is literally made from oil.

Advertisement
Content cannot be displayed without consent

“We got reviewed one-star across the board for service, food, atmosphere. Which is just not true, the person that left the review has also always reviewed everyone else one-star as well.”

India said one-star review ratings, when untrue, can lead to damage for hospitality business. “We obviously don’t like real bad reviews from customers and we reply to those but when you do you get something like that you do have to make a joke out of it”, she said.

“What’s important to me is making sure the staff don’t feel like they’ve done something wrong. We’re very lucky that what we actually have is a good product and everything else hopefully matches up to that so I’m not too worried about it, but my concern across the board for other businesses is that people who have nothing better to do are trying to cause people’s businesses harm in a climate that is already difficult for independent hospitality businesses.

“When you get a review like that unless you make light of it it becomes a problem. I think it’s if something as ridiculous and damaging as that you should respond.”

Advertisement

She added: “The team are really pleased with how everybody has got behind us and all the positive comments. I think the sad thing is I don’t think people understand how much damage a review can do.”

This came following the M.E.N’s look into one-star review problem at Manchester’s restaurants earlier this year. Google pointed out they will only act to remove reviews if they violate content policies or local laws.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Seven people, including two police, dead in A66 South Bank crash

Published

on

Seven people, including two police, dead in A66 South Bank crash

The crash occurred on the A66 in South Bank at 3.39am today (Saturday, August 22), and involved a marked police vehicle and a Volkswagen Passat.

Cleveland Police said the Passat was travelling in the wrong direction when it collided with the police car, which was travelling in the correct direction.

All seven occupants of the vehicles – two police officers and five members of the public – were pronounced dead at the scene.

Advertisement

Pictures from the scene show a police cordon in place.

The road is expected to remain closed for the rest of the day.

Chief Constable Victoria Fuller of Cleveland Police said: “First and foremost, our thoughts are with the families of everyone involved in today’s incident.

“No one should leave their home and not return safely, including police officers serving their communities and protecting the people of Cleveland.

Advertisement

“This tragic incident will be felt across Cleveland, within our communities and throughout the entire policing family.”

A referral has been made to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), as is mandatory in these circumstances.

Cleveland Police said an investigation is under way and that all families are being offered specialist support.

The North East Ambulance Service, Great North Air Ambulance Service and Cleveland Fire were also at the scene.

Advertisement

Anna Turley, MP for Redcar and Cleveland, said: “I am deeply saddened to hear of the fatal collision on the A66 this morning.

“My thoughts are with the families and loved ones of those who have lost their lives, and with everyone affected by this terrible incident.

“Thank you to all of our emergency services, who have worked through the night responding to this devastating incident.

“The A66 remains closed in both directions between Normanby Road and Church Lane. Please avoid the area and use alternative routes.

Advertisement

“We would ask everyone to avoid speculating online to respect the families and the police while they do their work at this terrible time.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Jihadists slaughter and kidnap dozens of people for ‘not practicing the true teachings of Islam’ during Friday prayers in Nigeria

Published

on

Jihadists have kidnapped and slaughtered scores of people in an attack during Friday prayers in central Nigeria. File image shows a Nigerian jihadist in 2014

Advertisement

Jihadists have kidnapped and slaughtered scores of people in an attack during Friday prayers in central Nigeria

The exact toll of the attacks, which also hit the village of Binzi in Niger State, was unknown, federal representative Jafaru Mohammed said. 

Jibril Ahmad, a civilian who survived the attack, said: ‘Soon after finishing the normal Friday prayer, the armed group of Lakuwara, in their hundreds, wielding guns, knives and machetes, began to attack us.’

‘They slaughtered some of our people, saying we are not practising the true teachings of Islam,’ Ahmad added. 

Advertisement

Some are understood to have escaped when another jihadist group, known as Mahmuda, started clashing with the militants.

Niger state police said they were aware of the kidnapping, but had not received reports of deaths. 

Africa’s most populous country is battling a 17-year insurgency by jihadist groups, who have made such abductions a key tactic – including the 2014 kidnapping of hundreds of schoolgirls in the town of Chibok.

The insurgency is concentrated in the northeast, though Friday’s attack was in the west of the country, an area that has seen increased activity by armed groups and militants from the Sahel as the conflict has splintered.

Advertisement

Jihadists have kidnapped and slaughtered scores of people in an attack during Friday prayers in central Nigeria. File image shows a Nigerian jihadist in 2014

Some of the jihadi militants in Nigeria have presented themselves as an alternative to the government in areas with limited government and security presence.

A key issue in Nigeria is the poor welfare of the country’s overstretched and underpaid security forces, which President Bola Tinubu has sought to address by recently announcing pay rises and mass recruitment for the military.

Advertisement

The latest kidnapping comes just weeks after 163 kidnapped Nigerians were rescued from jihadi captivity. 

The freed captives, mostly women and children, were handed over to authorities by security forces in Ilorin, the capital of Kwara State, earlier this month. 

The Nigerians were abducted on February 3 when jihadi militants stormed the village of Woro, killing over 160 others. 

February’s attack was one of the deadliest in Nigeria in recent years, and showed how militants who had previously focused their activities in the north are moving south through Africa’s most populous nation, where gangs compete for territory and control of natural resources in villages where they outnumber the country’s overstretched security forces.

Advertisement

The US is providing military support to Nigeria under an agreement it says aims to protect Nigerian Christians, though much of that support is restricted to logistics and intelligence-gathering at the heart of the violence in the north.

The victims in the Muslim-majority Woro were rescued this month alongside 145 other victims who had been kidnapped, mostly from the neighbouring Niger State.

Local authorities did not say how the captives were rescued from the dense, expansive forest of the Kainji Lake National Park.

President Tinubu described it as the ‘largest rescue operation ever’ undertaken on a single day, and promised to intensify operations against armed gangs.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Is Casualty on tonight? When it’s back and next on TV confirmed | Soaps

Published

on

Is Casualty on tonight? When it's back and next on TV confirmed | Soaps
Bad news for Casualty fans – but there’s something big to look forward to (Picture: BBC Studios/Alistair Heap/Matt Burlem)

For fans of Casualty, the wait continues for their usual Saturday night trip to Holby City Hospital.

Last month, the BBC One medical drama aired the final instalment in the latest boxset Lethal Legacy.

The mini-series primarily focused on exploring Flynn Byron’s (Olly Rix) army past, as well as the relationships Dylan Keogh (William Beck) has with son Matty Linlaker (Aron Julius) and friend Stevie Nash (Elinor Lawless).

Also, Rash Masum (Neet Mohan) received some really positive news, as he learnt that he had finally become a consultant!

Advertisement

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

Elsewhere in the ED, this boxset saw Rida Amaan (Sarah Seggari) come to terms with her alopecia diagnosis. She was supported by friend and colleague Jodie Whyte (Anna Chell), who helped pick Rida back up whenever her confidence was low.

Advertisement
A Casualty collage that features Rash, Stevie, Flynn, Siobhan and Dylan against a smoky emergency department.
A new era awaits (Picture: BBC/Metro)

Speaking of Jodie, the character turned into a bit of a detective this mini-series, as she became passionate about exposing the truth surrounding a local housing development Wyvern Hill.

Here’s everything you need to know on why Casualty is not on TV and when it’s back.

Why is Casualty not on tonight and when is it back?

Casualty has finished its Lethal Legacy boxset and thus it is currently off air – and won’t return to our TVs until the start of September.

Dylan, Cam and Rash outside the ED in Casualty
The doctors of the ED will face their biggest challenge yet upon Casualty’s return (Picture: BBC)

The show will stage its TV comeback on Saturday, September 5 with a special double-bill to celebrate 40 years on our screens.

Ask Metro


Use AI to go deeper into the stories you care about – powered by Metro and trusted publications.

Advertisement

And it’s safe to say this particular trip to Holby hospital will change everything.

The massive anniversary event centres on a high-stakes major incident that puts Holby in chaos.

Lives hang in the balance and the ED team are pushed to their absolute limits in a tense and emotionally charged story, bringing together some of the show’s most beloved characters.

Advertisement

A major rescue operation unfolds, forcing impossible life-or-death decisions and testing the courage, resilience and leadership of those at the heart of the hospital.

Elsewhere in Casualty news, it’s been reported that Kirsty Mitchell and Sammy T Dobson will leave their roles as Faith Cadogan and Nicole Piper at some point after the anniversary.

If you’ve got a soap or TV story, video or pictures get in touch by emailing us soaps@metro.co.uk – we’d love to hear from you.

Join the community by leaving a comment below and stay updated on all things soaps on our homepage.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025